Richard Dawkins' Blind Faith in the Non-Existence of William Lane Craig's CV

[MegaExelo]

From the comments below, it seems as if Richard Dawkins has already brain washed atheist!

[KBrimstone]

Awesome. Just Awesome.

[YahwehtheLORD]

Dawkins. Hmmm my last name is Hawkins.

[pawsoned]

Who's afraid of William Lane Craig?

[allan3141]

@pawsoned Richard Dawkins

[pawsoned]

@allan3141 lol indeed

[IloveYOUviruses]

Alzheimer?

[truth2350]

Atheism-assumptions backed by assumptions, creationism-evidence seen in precise governing properties and nature in its works.

Pilt down man isnt the only case of forgery when it comes to the "evidence" behind "evolution".

[truth2350]

@Christheatheist1 Nice come back, sarcasm. You didnt correct me all you did was get upset :( LOL and as I can see you are so offended by this video you belittle and harass as much people as you can in the comment section, do you feel special now :/ I said Pilt down man isnt the only case of forgery when it comes to the "evidence" behind "evolution". In a field that presses for results sometimes actual truth gets overlooked to suport someone's dominance issues, you have demonstrated that here.

[snoobaroo2000]

richard dawkins has strong beliefs on little or no evidence. he then tries to spread his beliefs....hoping that his followers will also ignore evidence too. perhaps they just believe him about everything he says...seriously deluded

[m1chae15]

So, Dawkins is a no show then?

[PMEWhite]

I love how they openly mocked Duck Dawkins, having an empty table and chair with his name sitting on it, just in case he decided to "show up at the last minute". Any chicken feathers found nearby?

[Birdieupon]

@Christheatheist1

"Dawkins doesn't debate ignorance"

He's made a living out of it. But since you're ignorant of that fact, I guess you're not worthy of arguing of me ;-)

[mhssu]

@Christheatheist1 This comment goes against all the available empirical evidence. Dawkins has debated ignorant people, and these exchanges have been recorded. There have been repeated and enthusiastic attempts to get Dawkins and Craig in the same room to debate, and, given the enormous size and quality of Dr Craig's CV and his respect in his field, it is obvious that William Lane Craig is not in any sense ignorant.

[PMEWhite]

@Christheatheist1 Right! Now just an attempt to take any of your blathering as truth, if it is so that Craig is an 'ignorant plonker', then wouldn't it not behoove ol' 'Duck' Dawkins to engage Craig, one on one? Just simply to silence Craig, once and for all, AND on video? Sorry, it appears even 'Duck' Dawkins knows the REVERSE would only be True, and this is why ol' 'Duck' Dawkins is and forever will be A CHICKEN!

[Birdieupon]

@Christheatheist1

"Craig is an uneducated street oaf and Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist. "

Did you even watch this video? What more evidence of Craig's credentials do you need?

Perhaps it's worth noting that he's written more than Dawkins, and far more for academic rather than popular consumption... AND Dawkins' professorship was actually INVENTED for him precisely for the purpose of writing to a lay audience!

If you don't engage with the evidence presented here, expect to be blocked.

[Birdieupon]

@Christheatheist1

"Credentials from a Bible college do not equal actual credentials. "

Birmingham University is a bible college?

"to England's Professor for Public Understanding of Science"

Which was invented for him by a rich atheist. It involves NO academic work at all. He simply writes books for people who read Harry Potter.

Your willful ignorance of evidence is breath-taking.

[Birdieupon]

@Christheatheist1

Actually, I'm simply asking you to engage with the evidence: clearly presented that Craig is an established philosophical intellectual within academia. The proof lies in his books being on the faculty resources list as far back as 1980 and that they dominate the responses in peer-reviewed journals.

But, apparently, you don't care to even take this on board. You prefer to troll.

Which is why, guess what, you're blocked buddy!

[allan3141]

@Christheatheist1 everything that has been said to you was factual, but clearly has all gone over your head. Richard has NEVER been Professor of Evolutionary Biology. The Professorship he eventually acquired "Professor for Public Understanding of Science" was indeed invented for him and paid for by a rich atheist. Prof Craig as two Phd's and certainly not form bible diploma mills as you imply.

And it is Richard who is writing popular books; you have once again got yourself confused.

[japonizieify]

@Birdieupon "INVENTED for him precisely for the purpose of writing to a lay audience!"

and there’s nothing wrong in that. Dawkins was eligible for this professorship because he's universally accepted by his scientific peers. The list of scientists who "have his back" is endless.

[allan3141]

@Christheatheist1 of all the ignorant comments I have read on YouTube yours takes the biscuit.

[Birdieupon]

@Christheatheist1

Then look up the video "12 Ways to Duck Debating" and you'll find not only is this excuse invalid, it's 1 of 12... which are also invalid.

Also... perhaps try watching THIS video.

What an idiot.

[PMEWhite]

@Christheatheist1 Good for him, although Dr. Craig is not a Creationist, he is a renowned Christian scholar, philosopher, and Christian apologist.

[PMEWhite]

@Christheatheist1 ...Who happens to beat every whiny atheist in debate hands down, so what does this say about the atheists?

[PMEWhite]

@Christheatheist1 Excuses Excuses.

[PMEWhite]

@Christheatheist1 Yeah, you just go on and keep believing that, I don't mind.

[walkingphilosopher]

@Christheatheist1 Go whine somewhere.. The best place to shine Dawkins' shoes is at richarddawkins . net , not here. You new atheists can cuddle up together over there.

[07Aristotle]

@walkingphilosopher Haha!

[TheisticThinker]

@Christheatheist1 You are seriously so stupid and ignorant it's not even funny! Stop making Atheism look bad and try to say someting with substance.