Added: 5 years ago
From: kineticpsycho
Views: 144,438
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (641)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • i dont get it

  • This video sucks, and all u guys need to stfu grab a beer and quit trying to make so much sense out of this...... It's just a theory

  • Aquí no se ve na de na!

  • had to listen 2x to fully understand, instant favorite. thanks!

    great insight.

    now it's more clear to me, that space-travel without time is actually time travel(a lightspeed vehicle that does not move through time)

    time-travel without space is actually space-travel or teleportation(the vehicle you described that moved through time only)

  • That means if you move 150 miles a sec in the opposite direction of where the galaxy is moving, then you aren't really moving at all. You've only slowed yourself down. Your mass would probably drastically decrease as well and you'd have to travel twice as fast in the opposite direction to ever hope to make it back to your galaxy in the same amount of time it took you to get to where you ended up.

  • That was brilliant.

  • @siaic thank god there's inertia

  • @IncarnateEvil I am well aware of that, but in general when you talk about the planet earth's speed, it's usually around our sun. Unless otherwise specified. The point I was getting at was his incredibly vague and useless ideas.

  • can you go back in time to mr biladens parents bedroom and tell them to where a condom. :D

  • lucky i dont have a time machine

  • I honestly don't know how you can take yourself seriously.

  • lol whats your perspective when your talking about the speed of the earth. If it's the sun, then your only off by about 500,000 miles an hour. Did not set that up very well i must say.

  • Sorry bub, ever since your little telekinesis puppet show where the magnetized lego dude moves at :42, I have determined that you're full of poo.

  • @shnearps literally judging from how he sounded

  • Yes, you can travel through time, just don't expect your luggage to get there at the same time

  • @atlantoon you my friend are just amazingly funny xDDD

  • a bit of a no-brainer, to be more accurate you must also take into consideration the suns movement in relation to the center of the milkyway, the movement of the milkyway itself, and also the general expansion of the universe. Hopefully the universe itself isn't moving or spinning, or else you're really screwed there.

  • Kinetic psyco? Jason Mraz..sick him...

    So there you go. Any questions (Sorry about the "Energy" joke... it wasn't as sick as your CSIS joke) I'll refer to, hmm.... UBC . Over to you, UBC.

    : O <--- UBC.

    That's the other thing, 10 years ago they were all kids.

  • You takin the Mic? eh? You takin the Mick outta me?

    >:[

    OF course it's not possible. That's why I "took the time" (pun intended) to show UBC and half of National Security chasing me. Obviously, it just plain isn't. As Einstein said "time travel would require the consumption instantantiously of more than all of the energy available in the Universe at any given moment in a sustained flow. [sic]". Obviously none of what I showed you is at all possible , without the acquisition of more "Energy";)

  • @BillyJimism Not necessarily what if u just be still? here,s a theory since we know that time slows with speed and everything is moving over half a million miles a second if we built a machine that could travel high enough to go outside the our galaxy and back to earth rapidly wouldn't it achieve time travel? because you'd be outside of the speed and time of our galaxy as its still traveling through time at its speed.....unfortunately it would be only future traveling never vice versa.

  • @lando9386 that wouldn't necessarily be time travel but teleporting. The unchanged variable would be the speed of the earth, sun, and galaxy. So the speed of the space-craft would have to be presumably faster than the speed of light. In other words in order to do this you would need to cross into a higher dimension. The 4th which in which case every object would contain(length, width, height, and time). In the 3rd dimension every object cast a shadow, well in the 4th its shadow would be time.

  • @dm40b latter part of your explanation is wrong. we're already in 4-D. 3-D space 1-D time. shadows only occur for space, where we are now, shadows are 2-D space. when you say cross to higher dimension, that's 5-D: 4-D space 1-D time- and here, shadows are 3-D space. you can't consider the time dimensions together with space as you did. The 4th dimension of space has obj that would contain(length, width, height, and 4th dimension of space w/e you want to call it but it's NOT time)

  • @Ninshark That makes zero since, do you know anything about physics? Are basic science of that matter? We are 3 dimensional beings placed on the time-space continuum. If we were 4th dimensional beings, the shadows we cast would be in the 3rd dimension. Which would make no since, it is beyond our perception as human beings. The 1st dimension= length. 2=lenghxwidth. 3=lengthxwidthxheight=(volume)­. And i specifically stated "objects".

  • @dm40b I'll repeat myself again, yes we are 4-D beings with 3-D in space, 1-D in time...you can't put them together like you did already, better if you keep them separated. when you said "4th dimensional beings" again, you refer to 4-D space.

  • @Ninshark I did NOT say we are "4-D beings, because we are not"... you know why because cartoons for example are 2-D.. they are flat have no depth, no volume!! Just length and width!! If we were, as you say "4-D beings" our shadows casted by a light in a dim room would appear as you are now; 3-D... Dimensions range from 0-infinity.. but we are only able to measure 1-12. And there's today's lesson kids, stay in school so you don't end up like Ninshark.

  • @dm40b I don't understand why you have to attack me like that. still again, you refer to 4-D beings as being 4-D space. oh well, this has nothing to do with my correction to you in your reply to lando9386. Take a look at your reply to him, you agree with me now that 4-D space obj casts 3-D space shadow. add in time, then that obj. is 5-D with 4-D space and 1-D time. I'm going to restate a 3rd time for you that we are 4-D with 3-D space and 1-D time. since we are 3-D space, shadow is 2-D space.

  • You takin the Mic? eh? You takin the Mick outta me?

    >:[

  • Isn't Cycokinesis the division of the cytoplasm?

  • Although his theory does make sense!Its virtually impossible because well time was created by man himself so this is just our thought its not an actual....thing as you would call it.

  • lol idiot

  • i wish this video will travel through space so it can disapear

  • i traveld in time one time and i was in 1928 i gave my mobile to an old lady and she was talking to me in 2010

  • If you say “we move that speed” you have to ad relative to which object. And you mean to the center of the Milky Way? Ore the center of the galaxy? It will matter fore the speed. You have to find a ” golden standard” where there is no movement, the ultimate Center of everything.

  • @artamatra I guess in theory that ultimate center would be where everything was compressed before the big bang.

  • @ColonelPatchy1 Actually, that ultimate center was about 13 billion years ago. When talking about the universe, you have to think in terms of space-time. When you're looking at celestial bodies, you're looking back in time. In the case of galaxies, billions of years.

    If you had an infinitely strong telescope, you could actually see the beginning of the universe. Actually, that's not entirely true; in the very early universe, all light was absorbed (google "cosmic background radiation").

  • but your moving time not space 

  • @gothicsoul100 it called space time. time and space are the same thing acording to enstiens theory of relativity

  • @gothicsoul100 exactly so when you time travel you dont move with the earth so the earth will be 150 miles away from you or on top of you.( if you time travel for 1 second)

  • A particle cant travel faster than the speed of light, not because you would need infinite energy to do so, that would be ridiculous, but its because light cant travel faster than its self. Matter must be a none linear energy wave. and the change in mass in Zero gravity at high speed means there is some reaction between matter and space, this reaction must be with linear energy, because there is nothing else in space to react with.

  • @Artmgjr you cant time travel !

  • You cant time travel, you should know that Mr Kineticpsycho.

  • uhh how did the astronauts not get ditched?

  • thats something i have never thought about.... i like this one.

  • i've been thinking time travel fore some minutes. u can travel in the future, but once you travel in the future you can't come back.

  • very bad things lol and don't say "I think". Scientists have been saying this as long as I can remember.  It's kind of like writing a scientific paper with no references.

  • Miles are allready a stupid mesurement! proving that ur stupid!!

  • Fuck, I can't even tell if this guy is joking or not

  • @exhalesolutions

    hi is not joking...he is a joke...

  • dus that mean amelia airheart was a time traveler?????????????

  • Well then this explains what happend on the Eldridge. (PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT)

  • @JKx i live in philadelphia and i heard about it and its weird i know the government is hiding something

  • what some people don't consider is the amount of crap they waste their time listening to

  • Do you do any research, or do you just like talking? Speculation is fine. Theoretical astro-physics is fine, but you sir, are an idiot. "If you're ship can't travel through time AND SPACE" lol, you realize that you move through 'space' when you get up off the couch and walk through the bathroom.

  • @ExodusFaces you do know he's talking about both at the same time.............if it begins travelling through time and loses its ability to travel through space.......thats what I think he means

  • @MasterMaxD Yeah I know thats what he means. But as long as you are MOVING then you are moving through space. and THEORETTICALLY, traveling through space at a high enough speed will have you travelling through time. So if you stop moving, then you stop travelling through time, thats all. They put a very accurate clock on a plane and found that it slowed down at higher speeds, proving the theory

  • i went through a black hole once and im perfectlly fine 

  • oh my god i laughed so hard with this!

  • I don't think he took first grade science. We have whats called an Atmosphere. The urban definition for it would be "a force that keeps shit on the ground."

  • LMFAOROFLMOA

  • @heresathought : it won't kill you , nobody knows , yet, what really happens when matter enters a black hole

  • @Ssj3kakarotto You're thinking of a wormhole. When matter is pulled into a black hole (A quantum singularity, the mass of several planets compressed into an object the size of a pinhead.) it is torn apart by the massive gravitational difference between its two ends.

  • @Heresathought O.o ?

  • I've thought of location and kp is right

  • lmfao

  • omg there is so mutch radom shit on youtube....

  • actually its 2.21 gigawatts and if the doctor can do it so can you

  • I just built a time maching out of a Yugo but I only need a is some plutonium to produce 1.21 jigowatt (as is on movie) or I can lend kinecitpsychopath the car and ram it in a power plant that sounds like a great idea lol but he would have to reach at least 55 mph with his fat as in it..

  • @woodmouse80 I believe its gigawats. and you must go at 88 MPH, jeez kids these days don't know how to properly timetravel!

  • wow and you have enough time to comment on all his videos? Wait who has no life?

    fucking pathetic.

  • The question is: Is there just one timeline? Yes it is theorized there is only one. But a theory is not more than what it is: A theory.

    The day time travel is discovered only the powerful few will make use of it and keep it a secret, in fact, someone may have changed the timeline several times already.

  • Doc I didn't get to 80 miles an hour quick enough lol

  • THATS WHAT HAPPEND TO ELIVIS!

  • ROFL, yeah im planning on traveling through time... im going to travel forward at 60 seconds per minute...

  • hahaha. stop posting these bs videos before you turn other people into just as much of a retard as you.

  • LOL

  • IN ORDER TO GET TO TIME TRAVEL IS TO TRAVEL FASTER THEN THE SPEED OF LIGHT AND ONCE IN THIS STATE TRAVEL THROUGH a. A WORM HOLE b. A BLACK WHOLE or c. A VERY POWER FULL ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE

  • wrong you travel near the speed of light, time slows time, your in the future

  • You do realise that travelling "through" a black hole would simply kill you right?

  • @Heresathought  Black holes have two sides, as you are destroyed on one side you are rebuilt on the other side at the speed of time.

  • @Felderos speed of time?

  • @lookatthisfuckingguy yup the speed of time. Which time is non existent in a place with no spinning planets or speeds to record. If you think of it that way, you are already on the other side of the black hole before you go into it.

  • @Heresathought why anybody would be so sure of themselves to claim they know exactly how black holes work is beyond me.

  • @goody8504 By anybody, you mean me? A black hole is a quantum singularity. It's an insane amount of matter compressed down into an object the size of a pinhead. It's gravitational pull is so strong that not even light can pass over the event horizon and still escape. Light travelling along the event horizon is bent. If you cross the event horizon of a black hole, the gravity difference (see inverse square law) across any vessel would spaghettify it (Stretch it out, and tear it apart.)

  • @Heresathought true also all laws of physics imply that no one can go back in time because....you can't it all ready happened you can't change what already happened so this guys understanding of physics is way off Plus I have Phisicists in my family and have some nuclear phisicists as friends who back me up

  • @Vyourtchenko64 I have 2 theories

    1) if time travel was possible then..well..it wouldn't be exactly time travel. i believe that you could only S.EEthe past..NOT CHANGE it..

    2) or..you can travel back in time... and change....which can be a risk..or the opposite..who knows???

  • @babbisp1 The problem with time traveling to the past is that it creates paradoxes, but in vice versa, paradoxes are eliminated. Physics doesn't allow people to time travel to the past, but it allows people to travel to the future.

  • @angelsssssssssssss you cant time travel !

  • @SASNIGHTCRAWLER You don't think time travel is possible because you had landed on what they called, "Confirmation Bias." You are simply blind to the truth. I believe in time travel not because I want to believe, but because I have seen priori evidence that justifies the possibility of time travel. Believe it or not, but Einstein was actually into time travel. Look up Time Dialation, which has been scientifically established in Physics.

  • @angelsssssssssssss No m8 i did think it was possible, but after much thought i came to the conclusion its not. You can freeze or hold back particles with mass or gravity and in theory Einstein would think or call it time travel, but its not, its just an effect as far as i am concerned...what evidence are you talking about, i would be very interested in knowing how you think it works and discussing it with you maybe.

  • @angelsssssssssssss I think this...we now gravity slows down time, yet they dont know what gravity is yet, they think it is created by mass at the moment, or it has something to do with mass, but still they dont know because they dont know what matter is. so they can only best guess with what they have found. now if gravity is within or created by each particle and the particle increases its mass due to high speed or gravity like earths spin etc it should create more gravity within itself and...

  • @angelsssssssssssss ....within the collective matter it belongs to. So this gravity may be nothing only the effects of the particle increasing its energy by its momentum. and the momentum is in some way slowing down the particle in relation to the others it is with in say the atom. in effect its like being pushed back in your seat in a fast car, but on a sub atomic level. everything from the particles, atoms and upto your cells, everything even your watch slow down. Thats time travel i think.

  • @angelsssssssssssss The only problem i have at the moment is this..,time litteraly ticks slower on earth, than space, yet when you measure the speed of light in space it should read the same speed as on earth...but if light speed is calculated by time, and time runs faster on earth, from a 3rd point outside the universe one should see light travel slower in the slower time zone than the light in the faster time zone, because you will see two people at 2 speeds measuring light at 2 speeds

  • @angelsssssssssssss The only thing i can think of as to this problem of mine is that gravity is an electromagnetic field of some sort, and the field is interacting with other incoming electromagnetic frequencies of energy, eg light and all the others etc or lets say photons...so if this field depending on density is slowing down light within it, energy or light can in fact be slowed down or we can speed it up, which means light could be manipulated.

  • @angelsssssssssssss Also, another problem is, that on earth their is air, which is made of atoms and particles of matter, which have gravity, now the higher up you go the thinner the air so the less gravity there is, or less ressistance for light or photons etc to move through it maybe,,,now in space, maybe there is less matter floating about meaning energy would travel even faster.

  • @angelsssssssssssss Now if this is the case an electromagnetic gravity field may not effect the light passing through it and gravity is nothing but the attraction of particles towards each other and not some graviton or force like a gravity field...meaning time is a constant and our perception of time is nothing more than how our particles react in motion.

  • nerd

    

  • @TheGoof01 Troll ^_^

  • @Heresathought you wouldn't travel through it, you would get crushed into it

  • @Ruvim69 Hence the inverted commas. It was a reply to another comment before the @[name] was introduced.

  • @Heresathought How do you know that? A Black is a super dense object and has a center so you'll have to hit somtheing eventually but also because of gravitational time dialation and other possibly unknown aspects of the universe, anything could happen and don't try to act as if your are completly right because many people that have been dismissed as worng end up right.

  • @Heresathought it is theoretically possible for a traveler to enter a rotating black hole, avoid the singularity, and travel into a rotating white hole which allows the traveler to escape into another universe.

  • @Heresathought it is theoretically possible for a traveler to enter a rotating black hole, avoid the singularity, and travel into a rotating white hole which allows the traveler to escape into another universe.

  • @Heresathought theoretically....have you been through one lately.... Imgine every phone call you make opens a small black controlled slip with the receiver and thats what gives you instand convo....we already know nuetrons can quantom jusmp its just hard to fing a stabilizer or some on/off control lol....

  • TimeTravel_0 : Detecting gravity is the hard part.

    TimeTravel_0 : I will tell you a littlke story.

    TimeTravel_0 : When time travel was invented.

    TimeTravel_0 : They built prototypes that would go back in time for a

    split

    second and then return.

    TimeTravel_0 : They had sensors and cameras on them.

  • TimeTravel_0 : ...and they never returned.

    G° : and forwards as well? how about a single jump forwards?

    TimeTravel_0 : It was later discovered that the machines were ending up

    about 15 miles away and 3000 fett in the air.

  • TimeTravel_0 : feet

    G° : doh!

    TimeTravel_0 : The Earth was rotating away from them.

    wyrmkin_37 : synchroniaztion please

    TimeTravel_0 : A system had to be invented that would "hold" the machine

    to

    the Earth.

  • TimeTravel_0 : Its called VGL.

    TimeTravel_0 : Its based on very sensative clocks and gravity sensors.

    TimeTravel_0 : It stops the time distortion machine if radical changes in

    gravity are detected.

    wyrmkin_37 : mechanical or electronic clocks

    TimeTravel_0 : You wouldn't want to end up inside a mountain or under

    water...would you?

    TimeTravel_0 : Cesium.

    wyrmkin_37 : oh

  • We as humans all ways travel in time. As seconds, minutes, hours, and days pass and you are there to witness them you also travel to the future. However our travel to the future, as you can see is very slow.

  • It might be possible in Zero G Who knows

  • WOW i traveled trough time 1:15 and i wish i could go back

  • one thing that human will never make possible but GOD, if THERE IS GOD, is time traveling!!! NOT in a 100 years, not in a million years!!

  • yup... and the earth is square... the sun revolves around the earth, not to mention we're only going to be riding on horses for the rest of our lives.

    considering how much we've evolved in just the past 100 years... time travel does not look to far fetched....

    I'm extremely excited to meet someone like yourself though, dunfukwitasianz.... I've never met someone who can predict the future...

  • could you imagne turning on ur tv and then the news

    breaking news the space shuttle launch have found a dead body floating through the black ness of space

    lolage

  • whaha, indeed.. already can imagine the time travel maffia..

    Then you would see a dead guy float in space with cement on his feet xD

  • your right (insanebrainn) XD

  • If he was near the equator, walking on a sidewalk, and the earth with the atmosphere stopped rotating abruptly, he would find himself flying through the air at about 1000 miles per hour becoming a human fireball due to INERTIA (I said it first professor!) and FRICTION.

  • i lost my time watching this crap!

  • is only a presnt time and time to come

  • time travel into the past is not possible . simply because the ability you mastered today was not mastered yesterday.time tavel into the future is however very probable but whose to say that there is a future because it has not happened yet.there

  • good point!

  • the only thing i got out of this video is i got to get more legos

  • same

  • i teach

  • lol soo true if you figure out the time travel thing.

  • Is time travel possble? Well according to current theories, yes it is possible in theory at least for transmitting data back in time. As for being left behind by a rapidly moving earth, to be honest I cant see that as being much of a problem since most theories of time travel involve some method of travlelling faster than light so you will have to travel through space.

    If you want to be pedantic then you could say that we are all time travellers going forward through time just not backwards.

  • agreed.

  • time travel IS impossible, get over it!!!

  • more like a theory. Will stay that way to its proven that you can't. Which is prob one of the theories that prob will nvr be tested.

  • I don't get it I said the exact same thing as you, TIME TRAVELING IS IMPOSSIBLE, and I didn't know you already said it. I got thumb down and you got thumb up? lol how funny!

  • cool but arent u to old to have those toys

  • Very good point there, I guess God wanted us to STAY ON NORMAL TIME!!!

  • 2012 will reveal all

  • no.... PHAIL!!!

  • finally some one who thinks that too im not crazy. but anyway you also have to take in consideration that the solar system is moving

  • Um....What?

  • doctor whos got one its called a tardis

  • space/time, pull the other, what's next space/millimetre continuum.

    jeez talk about fixations

  • if someone where to time travel, what the hell happens to the matter that is in the space they appear in?

  • Good question we take it for granted that no 2 particles can occupy the same space at the same time (outside of a black hole that is). But what happens to the matter that was in the the other room when you walked through the door? it was displaced, would it be inconcievable to think something similar would happen in the event of time travel?

  • imo time travel cant exist because time itself, at least the way its conventionally understood, does not exist.

  • hmm that is a cool thing to consider...

  • So that is where the Mayans went! Now i get it

  • thats why instead of using time travel its safer to just use chronokinesis and make your brain think you are speeding or slowing time, also making you look like a total jackass if you do it in public

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • Time travel will never happen. Enjoy the time you live in now.

  • if someone was to travel back in time, and kill a butterfly or something, it wouldn't alter the future, because it was suppose to happen...

    if you did go back in time and kill a butterfly or something, you wouldn't be able to reach that butteryfly to kill it, because it would have happened already, so it's not possible to alter the future by doing something like that, because it should have already happened...

  • really so if i killed George washington or jhon hancock nothing would be different no one would remember it becuase to them it never happend but to you its all clear

  • I think people have the ability to bend time using their pineal gland and energy pathways in the body. When this happens they are still moving along with earth but the vibrational frequency of the space in the immediate area shifts you over/up/wherever we don't know. If anyone wants to figure out time travel it starts with the body.

  • You're wrong. Your theory literally assumes absolute spacetime is real, which has been proven wrong by Einstein. Earth doesn't travel by any speed 'relative to spacetime'. The speed you have is relative to the solar system.

    And you must travel through a 'machine' or at least 'something', right? If that something is on Earth, then when you come out 'sometime' else, you'd be still on the Earth, since the machine does not fly away, does it?

  • In other words, we might just have to wait a few more centuries for time travel.

  • you can't travel through space without traveling through time. that would get rid of E from einsteins formula. even if you use a wormhole you still move through space. so i wouldn't worry about this.

  • Assuming time travel is possible:

    Absolute motion cannot be detected so there would be no way of knowing where you'd end up.

    The only sensible way of time travel would have to be some sort of 'tunnel' with an entrance in one time and place, and an exit in another time and place.

    If we assume general relativity is correct, travelling forward in time is a perfectly sensible idea.

  • happen to my cousin last year......

  • unless you move exactally one year into the past or future, than would there be problems?

  • The sun is also moving.

  • then, what if there was a craft thatyou traveled in, and if you wound up in space, just navigate yourself back to earth.

  • You're off your rocker my friend. Did you even graduated from high school?

    The human body cannot take such drastic changes unless encapsulated in some sort of machine that lessens the effects on ones body.

  • High school taught you this?!

  • Multiverses theory has a big part to play to. Even if you can travel in time you will not be in the same reality that you left but a parallel reality. So if you lets say killed Hitler it wouldn't change the time line you came from just the one your in. Also getting back to your time line out of a infinite amount of parallel reality's would be hard. So the only way to time travel is to go From Time/Space were we are into Space/Time and then back. Moving around in Time/Space is how you change time

  • A good point indeed, but movement of planets or even bigger objects in space might create or determine time as it is O_o.

  • GREAT SCOTT'S!!!!

  • i wont to say something very redicilos and very funny.

    can the ninjas travel to time?

    im just joking

  • Your explanations about miles, deep in earth, BS is really getting on my nerves in all of your videos.

    You can not time travel unless you move faster than light and that is nearly impossible for us humans.

  • It is impossible to go faster than the speed of light.

    The only way you could travel through time is by hopping into a working cryogenic chamber (future only) or by bending light, but I think you could only send data through such a device, not an actual person.

    However it's not certain it would end up in the right universe, as per the multiverses theory.

  • That's my point about light.

    Since you can't travel faster than light, time travel is impossible.

  • Special relativity does not deem time travel impossible; just improbable. Time dilation happens, not just at LS, but close to the LS as well - something that is possible to attain (though likely not a manned craft).

    Wormholes, should they exist, bend space AND time - and could be used for time travel. Creating a wormhole large enough for a spacecraft to enter would require more energy than the sun contains, but it is still physically possible (theoretically of course).

  • However, we've never seen a wormhole and the concequences of being in one.

  • The generally upheld theory is that neither matter nor information can travel faster than the speed of light.

    The only way to make something travel at a velocity greater than c would be to make it travel through some sort of area in which the speed of light was greater than c. Not dissimilar from raising the temperature of water above 100 celsius by increasing the pressure.

    The game, Mass Effect uses the same sort of idea for FTL travel but I imagine it'd be slightly harder than suggested.

  • In fact it's not light speed that matters, it's c. Not even light can travel faster than c. There's not enough energy in the universe to accelerate a mosquito to c so... Light speed can be lowered, c cannot. c is a constant.

  • you're missing my point. c is simply a number. it's the value we've given to the speed of light in a vacuum. it also happens to be related to the permittivity and permeability of free space. What I'm saying is that if you could alter these in a small amount of space then maybe light would travel faster.

  • The thought has occurred to me.