Yesterday this model of volvo saved my life, If it hadn't been volvo, nobody would had survived in the car, that's why I would like to thank all constructor and engineers of volvo for their GREAT WORK in improving safety!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@wheeliehome what is ment was what alexandergre said, which is basically it shows how safe the car is when you run into a wall, not a chevy suburban on a highway doing 60km/h to 100km/h
@alexandergre in crash tests, like thats on, its the car against a berrior thats not moving, when most frontal crashes are smaller cars vs bigger cars, the bigger car will win, and normally when theres a frontal impact crash in real life, the other car is moving in the opposite direction making the force of impact greater
Only one airbag deploys because there is no one in the passenger seat to trip the weight sensor. You have to be over a certain weight for the airbag to safely deploy.
@ToInfinity1 This car is not a 2009 model. It is the 2004 - 2007 model range. In 2008, they updated the models to a newer design and still keep that design today. What I don't understand is why the IIHS won't crash test the 2008 - 2011 models seeing that they are much more different than the older models, such as the one in this video.
Sad this is, it has a " acceptable " side and roll over rating. I own a 2010 Volvo XC60 and I feel very safe in it. I love knowing that if I ever was to be in a car accident, there is a low risk I would get hurt ..
volvo have always been passionate/pervasive about (holistic) safety and people, certainly before stars became a mainstream buying/selling point. i wonder what other car companies (governments?) are taking safety seriously and splashing cash above and beyond certain controlled crash tests. lest we read too much into these tests - dig around, get informed, know your priorities. volvo for life.
The Acura MDX is the safest passenger vehicle. This Volvo compares poorly with cars around the same price in crash tests. Lots of cheaper cars do better in crash tests than the S40.
@surethang27 What you don´t seem to realize is that a cars safety is not just depending on the passengers safety inside it , it also have to be safe in that matter that you must not cause to much damage on what your hitting(human, other car). Your japanese exampel is a car that I´d rather hit with my S40 , than being hit by. And I´ll bet "Lots of cheaper cars " also are alot bigger. But in your country , were a car that weighs 4 tons and is big as a church , is considered as "safe" , well.. LoL
The latest news is Communist China or at least a company from that country is buying Volvo from Ford. I don't think I would want to buy a car from a Communist country knowing that the increase in wealth that China will have will in part be used to improve their military.
@MrBEB123 absolutely, or perhaps you could stop buying those american related goods and so are other from those which supports the US gov, in order to really protect the poor mideasteners and ourselves, or you could simply go live in the woods instead, that will sure make your point clearer. many thx.
Yeah, mee to! But to be kind of serious for a moment: I'll soon be uploading a sequense of drawings based on a fierce and completely fictional Volvo concept, with the V8 from the XC90 Top model. That one would propably be able to go - well, nearly as fast, if it were a real car.
It is amazing. Especially if you consider that in this test it hit a stationary object. Imagine driving into another vehicle head on at 40mph, with the other vehicle going the same speed.
All Volvos have side air bags. The side bags did not deploy in this test because they did not need to... the dummy was perfectly straight and controlled even during the re-bounce back into the seat; testimony to a well designed car. As far as the driver's legs - even though the car is crumpling up and appears to be "smashing" into the legs, the fact is that the inside cabin remains almost fully intacted - exactly what it was design to do.
They unplug the sideairbags in these tests because otherwise you have absolutley no idea how the dummie react in the crash. other wise i would bet it would deployd. it is better that it does than not, you don´t loose anything if it do so why chance. today airbags doesn´t block the door in anyway so its not harder to get out that way, even if it always been that way.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hell naw this wasn't really good...take a look at the dummies head it doesn't go stright....Realize mo'fuckas....lexus is still have some good crash rating
The Main thing to look for is 1) the cabin that encloses the occupants is not crushed. Specifically look at leg space and whether steering wheel is pushed into the chest...2) ensure the head doesn't impact on anything hard eg dash, pillars etc. Slamming into airbags is OK.
I think your nose would be fine here. This car's airbag doesn't even get close to the dummy's face as it deploys. Go look at the 2005 Toyota Avalon crash test, that's a newer airbag that can break your nose...
60mph is a high standard, and really those forces from high speed wrecks really can't be designed for... economically. Really, most collisions on the freeway occur around 40mph, since people hit the breaks. Also, when colliding into another car, that car is also absorbs the impact, so designing a crash with simulating a brick wall is conservative.
Incredible... But a couple of things make me wonder... 1. The WHIPS system seemed out of order? 2. They must have disabled the rest of the airbags... But that might be so they can see what happens to the crash test dummy...
i dont know about safe but it is confortable,confortable it is!But for me the best car is the Audi its a mix it a safe car and confortable and its not THAT expensive
this car is well safe if it crashed into most other cars it would come off better they just have to crumble to take away the crash force from the passengers
i'm not a big fan of volvo, but they are deff one of thee safest cars on the road. they're the first to come up with the safetly lane change alert thingy. even their SUVs are pretty solid.
In certain markets, this can happen. Notably South East Asia, South Africa, Eastern Europe, South America. I've also been told if you buy an S40s in certain European markets to double check the VIN/ID etc because some S40s are made as "fleet" cars and lack side airbags etc.
The Focus and Mazda 3 share the same platform and much of the technology but may lack some of the side impact protection offered on the S40. Still in essence, this car is very good, you see the front of the car absorbed the impact and the safety cell was not breached. Just a word of warning, some markets receive models with less side impact protection, speak to your local dealer.
My s60 was a rolling fortress until the starter light wheels and my aftermarket rim started fucking up
overcastgabriel 4 weeks ago
good даже колесо не заклинило!!!!!
777Udav 3 months ago
The mirrors didn't go flying off, either!
murfslk230 4 months ago
Yesterday this model of volvo saved my life, If it hadn't been volvo, nobody would had survived in the car, that's why I would like to thank all constructor and engineers of volvo for their GREAT WORK in improving safety!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nokiapunk 5 months ago
Very Good!
THX1205 7 months ago
DID THE WINDSCREEN EVEN CRACK?!?!?!?!
AgentMrX7 8 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate volvo.... LEXUS all the way!
PS3Freak51 10 months ago
@PS3Freak51 why would you 'hate" it, has it raped you in the ass or something?
86kinky86 9 months ago 3
@86kinky86 ahauhahauahauhauhau. good.
EyesAngel7 4 months ago
i dont like lexus becouse its allmoust toyota. volvo its very good in crash test but go look dodge challenger crash test its good.
dodgemen1000 9 months ago
VOLVO for life!!!!! Best Car there is;-)
pervectra 10 months ago
Was one of the dummies texting?
MrKukenimunnen 11 months ago 5
Fake, the Volvo would have gone through the concrete block exit through the wall of the building. And would have stopped when it had reached China.
18iser 11 months ago 21
VOLVO IS THE SAFEST CAR IN THE WORLD....AGREED. IT'S BEEN TESTED BY IIHS, EUROCAP, AND NHTS. IT'S A TOP PICK FOR ALL THREE TESTING SITE'S.
alexmp2010 1 year ago
@wheeliehome what is ment was what alexandergre said, which is basically it shows how safe the car is when you run into a wall, not a chevy suburban on a highway doing 60km/h to 100km/h
speeddomon407kmh 1 year ago
@alexandergre in crash tests, like thats on, its the car against a berrior thats not moving, when most frontal crashes are smaller cars vs bigger cars, the bigger car will win, and normally when theres a frontal impact crash in real life, the other car is moving in the opposite direction making the force of impact greater
speeddomon407kmh 1 year ago
@speeddomon407kmh the bigger car will not always win. it depends on design of both cars
wheeliehome 1 year ago
how come they always have the windows down?
DoorisJ 1 year ago
Look at the airbag just patiently wait for the dummy. Awh (:
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
Only one airbag deploys because there is no one in the passenger seat to trip the weight sensor. You have to be over a certain weight for the airbag to safely deploy.
michaelzorrot5 1 year ago
probably drive that away! haha
RMLMACKIE 1 year ago 3
the tire is still ok! thanks volvo
maktoob110 1 year ago
what the?? a 2004 crash test is testing a 2009 car??
ToInfinity1 1 year ago
@ToInfinity1 how is it a 2009 car?
wheeliehome 1 year ago
@wheeliehome lol title misunderstanding... mb
ToInfinity1 1 year ago
@ToInfinity1 This car is not a 2009 model. It is the 2004 - 2007 model range. In 2008, they updated the models to a newer design and still keep that design today. What I don't understand is why the IIHS won't crash test the 2008 - 2011 models seeing that they are much more different than the older models, such as the one in this video.
LoveTheCity123 1 year ago
Sad this is, it has a " acceptable " side and roll over rating. I own a 2010 Volvo XC60 and I feel very safe in it. I love knowing that if I ever was to be in a car accident, there is a low risk I would get hurt ..
LoveTheCity123 1 year ago
volvo-because life couldnt get more boring
mf679 1 year ago
отлично даже стекло целое осталось.
prris28 1 year ago
1 airbag? oO
guilhermemomma 1 year ago
I wouldn't be afraid to sit in place a dummy ^^
froL1q 1 year ago
VOLVO is the best, well done!!
JENSDONT 1 year ago 4
When a car can take a hit from Chuck Norris fist its a safe car.......
-There are no safe cars
jagjagjag009 1 year ago
I have a 2009 titanium grey S40. Stylish not posh outside, feels like a well built tank on the inside. Volvo for life.
Jetbrowse 1 year ago
Only one air-bag?
ckarwing 1 year ago
@ckarwing sensor seats
highwayhazzard 1 year ago
@ckarwing I'm pretty sure the other one is switched off. How can a volvo have one airbag?!? Horrendous comment.
Jetbrowse 1 year ago
volvo have always been passionate/pervasive about (holistic) safety and people, certainly before stars became a mainstream buying/selling point. i wonder what other car companies (governments?) are taking safety seriously and splashing cash above and beyond certain controlled crash tests. lest we read too much into these tests - dig around, get informed, know your priorities. volvo for life.
hapenstans 1 year ago
Comment removed
hapenstans 1 year ago
The Acura MDX is the safest passenger vehicle. This Volvo compares poorly with cars around the same price in crash tests. Lots of cheaper cars do better in crash tests than the S40.
surethang27 1 year ago
@surethang27 hahaha your funny
ryanirocz3 1 year ago
@ryanirocz3 It's true. The Subaru Impreza and new Hyundai Sonata are two examples of much cheaper cars with better crash tests.
surethang27 1 year ago
@surethang27 What you don´t seem to realize is that a cars safety is not just depending on the passengers safety inside it , it also have to be safe in that matter that you must not cause to much damage on what your hitting(human, other car). Your japanese exampel is a car that I´d rather hit with my S40 , than being hit by. And I´ll bet "Lots of cheaper cars " also are alot bigger. But in your country , were a car that weighs 4 tons and is big as a church , is considered as "safe" , well.. LoL
Jokku423 1 year ago
@surethang27 Maybe because it was released in 2003-2004 and the replacement car is here (s60/v60).
Volvo and Mercerdes got the worlds safest cars and Saab isnt that far behind!
EgoJoel 1 year ago
@surethang27
You are simply wrong. Look over the results and you will see.
SkagSig40 1 year ago
@SkagSig40 What am I specifically wrong about? I have looked over the results extensively.
surethang27 1 year ago
I love my 2009 Volvo S40 ! I feel very safe in it.
NewYorkCityBoy123 1 year ago
nor the windshield brokes. Amazing!!!
josemanuel599 1 year ago 3
not even a crack in the wind shield superbe! A nice looking streamlined car stronger as a ugly buld and heavy american SUV thing
ofcourse it is european tecnology :p
215alessio 1 year ago 4
they call that good? i give it poor.
Hailey5210 1 year ago
@Hailey5210 Well I give it really good. You'd walk out of that car merely sore probably.
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
@Hailey5210
Yeah because you are an engineer and know what you are talking about. F off.
SkagSig40 1 year ago
yeah volvos are the safest cars in the world. I own a 2000 c70 and love it so much
DareOnlyGaming 1 year ago
holy shit, how did the windshield stay intact? freakin tanks man, not fair
chicoloco341 1 year ago
@chicoloco341 Thats Volvo - At a frontal crash only the engine block is wracked and the rest can be used in pieces for other cars.
Pirnachris1 1 year ago 2
The latest news is Communist China or at least a company from that country is buying Volvo from Ford. I don't think I would want to buy a car from a Communist country knowing that the increase in wealth that China will have will in part be used to improve their military.
MrBEB123 1 year ago
@MrBEB123 absolutely, or perhaps you could stop buying those american related goods and so are other from those which supports the US gov, in order to really protect the poor mideasteners and ourselves, or you could simply go live in the woods instead, that will sure make your point clearer. many thx.
paliwoo 1 year ago
@MrBEB123 So, that doesn't mean that Volvo's cars will be affected.
AdrianC12345 1 year ago
@MrBEB123 who gives a shit about commies, as long as ur life is in good hands. numb nuts
ajetha786 1 year ago
the truth u.s army in iraq!
welome to my channel
fallujah090 1 year ago
pretty buff car passenger compartment didn't even bend
heywatchme101 1 year ago
It shouldn't.
kehwa 1 year ago
I'd like to see a crash test performed at 301 km per hour.
AndersO1983 1 year ago
I would like to see a volvo going a 301 km/h
mundotaku 1 year ago
Yeah, mee to! But to be kind of serious for a moment: I'll soon be uploading a sequense of drawings based on a fierce and completely fictional Volvo concept, with the V8 from the XC90 Top model. That one would propably be able to go - well, nearly as fast, if it were a real car.
AndersO1983 1 year ago
To all those talking about side air-bags:
Every Volvo since 1996-6 has had side airbags in most markets.
I mean, come on, this is Volvo.. not Ford or Toyota...
looncraz 1 year ago 2
bloody volvo driver
garbagemankm 2 years ago
I like how all of the body damage immidiatly stops at the front door.
AdrianC12345 2 years ago 4
@AdrianC12345 Good point.
KrankySourPants 1 year ago
For who said that why side airbags didn't open. You are retarded this crash happened front of the car. Also more airbags more money dumbass.
womanizerg 2 years ago 2
Driving at 40mph feels pretty slow most times. Amazing that so much damage would be done if you crashed.
theberengersniper 2 years ago 3
It is amazing. Especially if you consider that in this test it hit a stationary object. Imagine driving into another vehicle head on at 40mph, with the other vehicle going the same speed.
It's frightening...
Zildjian285 1 year ago
@Zildjian285 well it wouldnt make a difference damage would be the same
wheeliehome 1 year ago
ES 2004 NO 2009 EL DEL VIDEO
MrFerrariii 2 years ago
no seas pendejo dice volvo s40 mode 2004 al modelo 2009 !!
yateviwey 2 years ago
All Volvos have side air bags. The side bags did not deploy in this test because they did not need to... the dummy was perfectly straight and controlled even during the re-bounce back into the seat; testimony to a well designed car. As far as the driver's legs - even though the car is crumpling up and appears to be "smashing" into the legs, the fact is that the inside cabin remains almost fully intacted - exactly what it was design to do.
neverhearof 2 years ago 4
They unplug the sideairbags in these tests because otherwise you have absolutley no idea how the dummie react in the crash. other wise i would bet it would deployd. it is better that it does than not, you don´t loose anything if it do so why chance. today airbags doesn´t block the door in anyway so its not harder to get out that way, even if it always been that way.
WeAllGonnaDieAlive 2 years ago
Wouldn't your legs be enjured.
chocolettunder 2 years ago
No side airbags?
thuglife4ever721 2 years ago
because it was a frontal collision?
sorken92 2 years ago 25
2006 have them for sure i own a s40 and it has the side bags
oyanezg 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
a.q. birde volvo sağlam deniyor araba resmen yarrağı yiyor PEGUE 307 bile bununla aynı sonuçları veriyor . FUCKYOU VOLVO
Leonkennedy07 2 years ago
much better than the old volvos
talonsbrutus 2 years ago
Взяли тачку испортили.Лучше бы машину подарили!!!!
TheTial 2 years ago
Try english...?
swertinge07 2 years ago
ah just do it the old fashioned way. put a cinderblock on the gas that way itll be more accurate
mydad95 2 years ago
WHATS THE speed in this test ????
asdgoasd 2 years ago
40mph
okopralatax12 2 years ago
64 km/h.
felsner1 2 years ago
probably 40 mph or about 65 kph.
USGiorgi 2 years ago
Poor pink man inside
Mik3Anix 2 years ago
ahahah, he is only born like that :P, White man, Nigga's, Pink's :P
Cybexify 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hell naw this wasn't really good...take a look at the dummies head it doesn't go stright....Realize mo'fuckas....lexus is still have some good crash rating
MrDelincuente 2 years ago
At 0:53 it is clear that the head did NOT hit anywere...
ManosS40 2 years ago 2
Volvo is great, and SWEDISH :)
Volvo has great safety records, the English police uses Volvo´s too! :P
minijeppe 2 years ago 11
Volvo is owned by Ford and this car is built in Belgium, I guess the badge is Swedish though...
/Swede and owner of four Volvos, all Swedish :p
AromaBeachComunity 2 years ago
Volvo är fortfarande "svenskt".
Volvo is still "swedish".
minijeppe 2 years ago
SANT = TURE
alexandergre 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nothing happend? So take a look - his back side of the head was in fatal blow!!! In real lifae it's will be very hurt :)
Timyadovny 2 years ago
You expect to be in a crash with out being sore?
EdwardPack1988 2 years ago
So is that a good crash test because i don't understand anything in crash tests?
For a person who dosent understand anything It looked horrible. :)
Specialized1993 2 years ago
The Main thing to look for is 1) the cabin that encloses the occupants is not crushed. Specifically look at leg space and whether steering wheel is pushed into the chest...2) ensure the head doesn't impact on anything hard eg dash, pillars etc. Slamming into airbags is OK.
CaptainMarvelStrikes 2 years ago 2
Airbags are designed for your head to slam into them, they are surprisingly tough. And this car's f***ing SAFE
whattheheck1000 2 years ago 6
early airbags had a tendency to break peoples noses lol
cameron20020 2 years ago 2
I think your nose would be fine here. This car's airbag doesn't even get close to the dummy's face as it deploys. Go look at the 2005 Toyota Avalon crash test, that's a newer airbag that can break your nose...
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
volvo is actually the safest car in the world
alexandergre 2 years ago 104
Volvos are very safe.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago 6
@alexandergre why.. its not the safest in the world.... know why... because its exsist other cars to...
marcus974ever 1 year ago
@alexandergre german cars like a mercedes, audi vw or bmw are super save too.but volvo is good too.
TheGanjamanCLP 1 year ago
@alexandergre and i got one :)
jumpingking13 1 year ago
@alexandergre Very obvious too. I think the puppet isn't injured
VolkswagenTSI 1 year ago
@alexandergre got bought by chinese
jovianksc 1 year ago
@alexandergre
fuck Volvo, you need a little danger in your life
thefutureboom 1 year ago
@alexandergre oh really , believe everything you are told do you , wanker
HateFuckingVolvos 11 months ago
@alexandergre and germans too!
thepricylon 7 months ago
@alexandergre Really didnt know that =O thank god i drive one then!
Marnarabyss 6 months ago
Actually, it was really good. Volvo is known for making safe cars.
MarkAM1994 2 years ago 10
Watch a chinese car going through that test procedure and you will know whats horrible. The Volvo S40 is one of the safest cars in its class.
Robex 2 years ago 7
It's a 2004 Volvo, look at the side of the car.
KkF00 2 years ago
I agree...it looked weird, but nothing happened.
k8002pack 2 years ago
0:28 dummy's head hitting the window frame. ouch
deltasworder1x 2 years ago
no it didn't? i can't see it hit the window
chesterchan2005 2 years ago
wow that hit was so violent the rear view door mirror folded O_O, overall Volvo is excellent!
BlkSerialKilla 2 years ago
Volvo is always the safest car as i know
chesterchan2005 2 years ago 6
yes..it has 5 stars
MySmegma 2 years ago
did the s40's get a 5 star rating?
jdubdoubleu 2 years ago
hell ya!
soccerlvr8221 2 years ago
front passenger section looked perfect!
musubi69 2 years ago
i kno, not even the doors crumpled
chccazbnSS 2 years ago
like a rock.........
GO VOLVO'S
adam22oflasvegas 2 years ago 11
60mph is a high standard, and really those forces from high speed wrecks really can't be designed for... economically. Really, most collisions on the freeway occur around 40mph, since people hit the breaks. Also, when colliding into another car, that car is also absorbs the impact, so designing a crash with simulating a brick wall is conservative.
JDankens 2 years ago 2
They need to start doing these tests at 60mph
RSCII 2 years ago 6
you can open the door and walk away ... then again, it's only 40 miles/hour or so ...
CaptainKhrenov 2 years ago 5
lol those things are like tanks
BillyWizzY2K 2 years ago 10
r designed to absorb most impact witout car crushing passengers. actualy designed to crumple.
jcadlols 2 years ago 2
Tanks??? Is a Diamond
BigRasen 2 years ago 5
whips only works in a rear impact & the car decides which airbags to deploy according to the force & direction of impact.
apollo3396 2 years ago 2
Incredible... But a couple of things make me wonder... 1. The WHIPS system seemed out of order? 2. They must have disabled the rest of the airbags... But that might be so they can see what happens to the crash test dummy...
Uheldigengel 2 years ago 2
yeah there's that airbag curtain that they disabled
trptsrule 2 years ago
really safe! nothing even happened to the windshield =O
owen75 2 years ago 9
safe car
JORDANLOH727 3 years ago 9
bumu dünyanın en sağlam arabası ??
teoman3413 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
holde your breth
1.copy paste
2.leave this comment on three different videos
4.if you can holde your breth the while time with out gasping for air your a good kisser
I just did it and it is ing hard
Smartdogproductions 3 years ago
lol depends on how fast your Internet is :P
ajdocumentary 3 years ago
yes you are right at this point, i was posting the comments and then my comments limits got exceed or something then i got owned, but i did it
Smartdogproductions 2 years ago
i dont know about safe but it is confortable,confortable it is!But for me the best car is the Audi its a mix it a safe car and confortable and its not THAT expensive
eduyoda2 3 years ago
Comment removed
sgtcht92 2 years ago
this car is well safe if it crashed into most other cars it would come off better they just have to crumble to take away the crash force from the passengers
dazzfuck 3 years ago
they said dat volvo make safe cars , but why does it not look safe ?
KPKonliner 3 years ago
U tell me, why doesnt it look safe to you? to me it absorbed the crash fine, the cabin kept intact.
cuerogym 3 years ago 7
well , volvo is safe , but check out mazda 2 and chevrolet captiva
KPKonliner 3 years ago
Haha chevrolets are death traps, and mazda 2? Really...? I own a Volvo and its the safest thing I have ever driven.
Audi6Audi 3 years ago 3
How in any way does that not look safe to you?
Audi6Audi 3 years ago
checkout mazda 2 , it looks safer
KPKonliner 3 years ago
i'm not a big fan of volvo, but they are deff one of thee safest cars on the road. they're the first to come up with the safetly lane change alert thingy. even their SUVs are pretty solid.
PhoenixOrion93 3 years ago
How the fuck does that look unsafe? It stands up perfectly. volvos are still the safest cars on the road.
samsemtex 3 years ago 3
In certain markets, this can happen. Notably South East Asia, South Africa, Eastern Europe, South America. I've also been told if you buy an S40s in certain European markets to double check the VIN/ID etc because some S40s are made as "fleet" cars and lack side airbags etc.
Kranbone 3 years ago
why they have to wreck it?!..they could just give it to me:)
rajngla77 3 years ago 4
this is most fuckin' random comment about car crash tests.
nenesibakire 3 years ago
i doubt hed want it,its probably not driveable(they probably removed all the featured that made it drivable)
rangerover06sc 3 years ago
The Focus and Mazda 3 share the same platform and much of the technology but may lack some of the side impact protection offered on the S40. Still in essence, this car is very good, you see the front of the car absorbed the impact and the safety cell was not breached. Just a word of warning, some markets receive models with less side impact protection, speak to your local dealer.
Kranbone 3 years ago 5
Less side impact protection? I would be surprised if Volvo offered S40's in any market without side airbags.
Jubbbbb 3 years ago
Notice how the damage ends exactly at the front of the passenger compartment. You could drive it off a cliff and walk away from it.
ecko8747 3 years ago 2
As long as you crash it at the same speed as the car in this video.
Memphis35 3 years ago 2
or slower
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
Are volvos really that great like everyone said????
846524162 3 years ago 4
Yeah they are
sexomansexo 3 years ago 4
what do they say?
hgfrjkgfjjj 3 years ago
Volvo's are known for its safety design and said that the windows dont shatter and they click shut when u crash. So they are great
soccerlvr8221 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
aston martin is safer
KPKonliner 3 years ago
and so is a tractor trailer..whats your point?
Iridium725 3 years ago
Volvo the best Safely car
tikoparko 3 years ago
carajo que buen carro!!
R3V0carlos 3 years ago
no need to talk for volvos.. they speak well for themselves :)
yehia2010 3 years ago 5
well of course volvo r the safety freaks
chippy7100 3 years ago 3
volvos are great cars
caraddict520 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bloody hell, the wing mirror nearly came right off.
I just watched a GM Saab 900 do a similar test and the car almost folded in half.
cfarnelli 3 years ago
Bloody hell, who the fuck cares about wing mirrors in an accident
alexkvaskov 3 years ago 14
Bloody hell, thats right... lol!
darkregard 3 years ago 4