@alloutoftime : Yes, it was. The cars affected had a major recall, and the later years weren't affected at all due to a redesign of the fuel tank. As Cardwellave said: it was over-dramatized. LOTS of cars of that era would explode if you rear-ended them at 45 mph, as would ALL of the pre-77 Chevy trucks that had the gas tank behind the seat, when they were hit from the side. Statistically, they were just as safe or just as vulnerable as any other car.
I agree cardwellave! If the Pinto was such a bad car, why was it the top selling American economy car in the 70s? I have owned 3, and I have a V6 pinto now. A little bit more maintenance then most, but that's ALL 70s cars. Quality wasn't there in the Americans. But Ford suffered from bad publicity because of bean counters at corporate.
tout l'monde dise que ford c dla marde .. sauf que tout l'monde aime la mustang ... c nimporte quoi..... ford c hot .... entouka moé j'aime bein les musclecars ... jenre la mustang ... la grand torino .... pinto ... etc ...
My aunt's best friend in high school was actually the person who first discovered/diagnosed the issue with the pinto's fuel tank... I have no idea what his name is, but he's def. from Redwood Falls MN
Ford had the opportunity to equip Pinto's with a safer designed fuel tank, at the time it was decided that wouldnt be COST EFFECTIVE....it was a costly mistake.
@freedomwarrior43 I thought of that joke first you fuck faced prick. You think you can go around stealing peoples jokes and making other people laugh? you can't... I'm gonna start calling you Carlos Mencia because you are a joke stealing piece of shit.
pinto what a piece of shit!!!i remember this the last time i saw one on the streets of california was on 2001.now there is no signs of anyone in the junkyards
The "blowing up" aspect of the Pinto was way over dramatized. The biggest part of it that Ford knew about the problem and chose that it would be cheaper to pay off ensuing lawsuits than fix the problem, which was something like $11 per car. In reality, the Pinto was no more likely to blow up in a crash than any other rear-wheel drive small bumpered car of its day, but the issue was so public, that they were thought to be dangerous.
@cardwellave: VERY WELL SAID! It is sad that people only associate them with "explosions" (when actually they didn't EXPLODE they could possibly catch fire {like many other small cars of that day} from leaking gasoline) and not the remarkable car they were in other ways, such as: gas mileage, relatively low maintenance (particularly by todays standards), and cheap to modest pricing. However, the people who were victims of the debacle certainly deserved to be compensated.
I drove 2 Pintos in the 70's, they were actually pretty good cars, and you could go along time before the gas gauge would start going down if you filled er up! True they were firebombs, but I was lucky and never got rear-ended thank goodness
the Pinto was a world class piece of shit, but not because it's a Ford, it's because it's a tiny little shitbox. the Ford LTD was in my opinion the most reliable car ever made. I got a 74 LTD, and I would never drive anything else. It's safe, reliable, roomy, comfortable, it handles beautifully, and you can litterally drive it to hell and back, and it will still give you years of good service.
Not the pinto though, or any other compact shitbox.
And yet the actual real life crash data shows that the Pinto was no worse than any other compact of that vintage for vehicle fires. The Pinto was chosen by you know who because it was a popular domestic model when people trusted the domestic models more than the imports. Unfortunately the media and "echo chamber" effect branded Ford's image with fire regardless of how the safety relates to the market in general, and that still haunts them today legally (CVPI fires). Don't be a mindless echo.
Lets just say its not more acurate than the original ads. The pinto was never marketed as sporty, the pinto WAS effeciant (I get 31 mpg from my 73 4spd non-overdrive pinto) before the Gov't mandated so much crap at one time, that Detroit couldn't keep up, and if you did any actual research, you would find that pintos had no more of a chance to blow-up than most other cars, and LESS of a chance than the Hondas of the same time.
the edsel was just ugly and had a stupid name. but hell they changed the name to falcon, two years later. didn't change the car at all and sold a hell of a lot of them. just proves how stupid americans are. oh well, and my mom had a 1973 baby poop brown pinto. she drove that sucker til 1984.
I've owned dozens of cars over the years but the 1976 Pinto is the only new vehicle I've ever bought.
(how sad is that?)
ButtBouncer500 5 months ago
just fyi TOYOTA CELICAS OF THE 70S HAD THE SAME PROBLEM ! MADE IN JAPAN ,,, FOR PANSIES
readyxxi 8 months ago
My question has always been, why not have people learne to drive then they wouldn't be hitting others and no boom?
tank72450 9 months ago
Does anyone know if the fuel tank explosion problem was corrected in later models such as the 1977-1980 models?
alloutoftime 10 months ago
@alloutoftime : Yes, it was. The cars affected had a major recall, and the later years weren't affected at all due to a redesign of the fuel tank. As Cardwellave said: it was over-dramatized. LOTS of cars of that era would explode if you rear-ended them at 45 mph, as would ALL of the pre-77 Chevy trucks that had the gas tank behind the seat, when they were hit from the side. Statistically, they were just as safe or just as vulnerable as any other car.
RitzyTrailer 10 months ago
@RitzyTrailer Thanks for the feedback.
alloutoftime 10 months ago
LOL
TheLizardKing1967 1 year ago
I agree cardwellave! If the Pinto was such a bad car, why was it the top selling American economy car in the 70s? I have owned 3, and I have a V6 pinto now. A little bit more maintenance then most, but that's ALL 70s cars. Quality wasn't there in the Americans. But Ford suffered from bad publicity because of bean counters at corporate.
Patchesinthebus 1 year ago
awsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
xxxphsicomanxxx 1 year ago
driving that says u have small penis and no girlfriend
talkofchitown1988 1 year ago
FUCK THIS... my pinto will rock your shit
MrAdmin28 1 year ago
tout l'monde dise que ford c dla marde .. sauf que tout l'monde aime la mustang ... c nimporte quoi..... ford c hot .... entouka moé j'aime bein les musclecars ... jenre la mustang ... la grand torino .... pinto ... etc ...
borntobewildpascal 1 year ago
what is 2 different between,,,
bobcat car and pinto car
bestamerica 2 years ago
That's funny - i don't care who you are
GriffinBillHewes 2 years ago
Ford susks. the only good thing ford ever made was Grand Torino
boxer301977 2 years ago
Your not serious are you?
WaterFromDodian 2 years ago
yes Ford sucks its no wonder American auto makers are going bankrupt
boxer301977 2 years ago
@boxer301977
yellowbusguy 1 year ago
your spelling susks.
radiozins 2 years ago
your a cunt
boxer301977 2 years ago
you suck dick
boxer301977 2 years ago
no I do not,but you susk you mama susk, your daddy susk and you still can't spell!
radiozins 2 years ago
@boxer301977 WTF, MAN? For me, Ford is one of the best brands in the world! If Ford sucks, so what's good?
VolkswagenGolf1400 2 years ago
Toyota, Vw, Nissan, Chrysler,
boxer301977 2 years ago
@boxer301977 I agree XD!
VolkswagenGolf1400 2 years ago
That was good, 5 stars!
Nicsho 2 years ago
haha the only car that doubles as a bomb.
pdennis93 2 years ago 3
My aunt's best friend in high school was actually the person who first discovered/diagnosed the issue with the pinto's fuel tank... I have no idea what his name is, but he's def. from Redwood Falls MN
bgreen94 2 years ago
This car maybe a POS but its a sleeper... beat the shit out of it and drop a 423 in it. Make sure to give it a shity exhaust and have fun :)
Stevenhiggles 2 years ago
Here's a piece of irony - the Pinto's introduction date was September 11!
trh2130 2 years ago
Ford had the opportunity to equip Pinto's with a safer designed fuel tank, at the time it was decided that wouldnt be COST EFFECTIVE....it was a costly mistake.
slay63 3 years ago
Pinto's where 5x popular lake the Mustang's when people stared crashing them it was recall time
MidnightClubsSR 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Could you repeat that?
kdvincent1982 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excuse me, could you say this in English please?
4Y83Z120401 3 years ago
because pinto's has been recalled due to the real life crash that makes the car double as a bomb
MidnightClubsSR 3 years ago
It can double as a bomb? Why isn't it more popular among Muslims? lol.
freedomwarrior43 3 years ago 17
@freedomwarrior43 I thought of that joke first you fuck faced prick. You think you can go around stealing peoples jokes and making other people laugh? you can't... I'm gonna start calling you Carlos Mencia because you are a joke stealing piece of shit.
sarbustal 1 year ago
@freedomwarrior43 That's what they used in 1993
TheLizardKing1967 1 year ago
I have a 1972 pinto and use it as a daily driver. they are easy to work on and have more style than those old imports accept mabye the vw bug .
jpandt0 3 years ago
pinto what a piece of shit!!!i remember this the last time i saw one on the streets of california was on 2001.now there is no signs of anyone in the junkyards
bengativo6 3 years ago
I agree. They also stall...like jackasses!
Rlotpir1972 2 years ago
pinto stands for .put it into oblivion..but reduced the words pinto.
bengativo6 2 years ago 2
The "blowing up" aspect of the Pinto was way over dramatized. The biggest part of it that Ford knew about the problem and chose that it would be cheaper to pay off ensuing lawsuits than fix the problem, which was something like $11 per car. In reality, the Pinto was no more likely to blow up in a crash than any other rear-wheel drive small bumpered car of its day, but the issue was so public, that they were thought to be dangerous.
cardwellave 3 years ago 9
@cardwellave: VERY WELL SAID! It is sad that people only associate them with "explosions" (when actually they didn't EXPLODE they could possibly catch fire {like many other small cars of that day} from leaking gasoline) and not the remarkable car they were in other ways, such as: gas mileage, relatively low maintenance (particularly by todays standards), and cheap to modest pricing. However, the people who were victims of the debacle certainly deserved to be compensated.
Chrliesangelsman 1 year ago
@Chrliesangelsman THANK YOU!!!!!!
scooterdude1945 1 year ago
@scooterdude1945: Yr welcome scooter...... I am glad you agree! :-)
Chrliesangelsman 1 year ago
@Chrliesangelsman cool lol
scooterdude1945 1 year ago
@cardwellave You're so correct. Pintos are great cars. I still have two of them and they are quite collectible.
LT1HILLINGHOE 1 year ago
I drove 2 Pintos in the 70's, they were actually pretty good cars, and you could go along time before the gas gauge would start going down if you filled er up! True they were firebombs, but I was lucky and never got rear-ended thank goodness
odie7 3 years ago 3
the Pinto was a world class piece of shit, but not because it's a Ford, it's because it's a tiny little shitbox. the Ford LTD was in my opinion the most reliable car ever made. I got a 74 LTD, and I would never drive anything else. It's safe, reliable, roomy, comfortable, it handles beautifully, and you can litterally drive it to hell and back, and it will still give you years of good service.
Not the pinto though, or any other compact shitbox.
wilkes85 3 years ago
My brother and brother in law both had LTD's in the 1980's and they were pieces of crap!!
odie7 3 years ago
well like all other cars, you gotta take care of them.
wilkes85 3 years ago 2
And yet the actual real life crash data shows that the Pinto was no worse than any other compact of that vintage for vehicle fires. The Pinto was chosen by you know who because it was a popular domestic model when people trusted the domestic models more than the imports. Unfortunately the media and "echo chamber" effect branded Ford's image with fire regardless of how the safety relates to the market in general, and that still haunts them today legally (CVPI fires). Don't be a mindless echo.
brealistic1970 3 years ago
Say that when your mother has permenant scars from almost burning to death in a Pinto as a kid asshole.
ae86sr5driver 3 years ago
I hope she had fun.
smeedlysmeed 3 years ago
In New Zealand we have a saying about Fords:
First
On
Rubbish
Dump
uzzle65 4 years ago
in america we say:
found
on
road
dead
tranurse 3 years ago 3
Lets just say its not more acurate than the original ads. The pinto was never marketed as sporty, the pinto WAS effeciant (I get 31 mpg from my 73 4spd non-overdrive pinto) before the Gov't mandated so much crap at one time, that Detroit couldn't keep up, and if you did any actual research, you would find that pintos had no more of a chance to blow-up than most other cars, and LESS of a chance than the Hondas of the same time.
k5laman 4 years ago 3
Get a grip! It's just a friggin' joke! I too am a Ford Fan. But, this was by far their worst P.O.S. ever...
etrigan68 4 years ago 3
Worse than the edsel? I think not.
smeedlysmeed 4 years ago
the edsel was just ugly and had a stupid name. but hell they changed the name to falcon, two years later. didn't change the car at all and sold a hell of a lot of them. just proves how stupid americans are. oh well, and my mom had a 1973 baby poop brown pinto. she drove that sucker til 1984.
tranurse 3 years ago
LOL baby poop brown
wilkes85 3 years ago