A gaming PC is not just for gaming like a console, it's like a console + a PC, thus making it ~$300 more than your normal PC that you likely own. If seen in that perspective, you will realize a gaming PC is no more expensive. Whatever you guys have presumed about PC gaming is incorrect or exaggerated, & I don't know why you continue to challenge PC gamers who naturally know more about it than you. If you are told that you are wrong, it's more than likely that you are wrong.
@HostelEffect LOL wow spoken like a true pc elitist. Should I bow or curtsy? What you don't understand is that many people just don't like to play games on their PC. People want dedicated hardware something that is used just for gaming. That's where consoles come in. Just because something can play games doesn't make it a console. Your cellphone can play games, does that make it a gaming console? Many people have old outdated PCs that can do everything except play modern games.
max 30fps? 20fps a third of the time? probably not even 720p? probably no AA? analog controller? probably low-quality textures? they better have dumbed this down from a much better pc version! console version of crysis? what a joke....
Yea i agree with that, but ps3 still better than the 360, i hate xbox its awfull in comparison, but xbl is good which is the only reason i have the 360,
Heres a little thing for u xbox 360 gamers.....YOUR CONSOLE HAS REACHED ITS LIMITATION FOR GRAPHICS AS IT HAS BEEN MAXED OUT, it did an extreemly poor job of running fc2 u really think it will run crysis any better? And well.....ps3 is nowere in the realm of reaching its graphics limitations as not all the power has been tapped, you pc gamers out there should/may agree with me here.
@emokiddy666 No, Real PC guys wont agree with that. Yes, the CPU in the ps3 WAS powerful 3-4 years ago, but unfortunately, the GPU and RAM in the system are a huge downfall, and actually less advanced than the older 360. Neither system is powerful anymore. I dont know who told you that about "untapped power", it only has 516MB of RAM. It doesn't have a hidden teasure inside, waiting to be found. 3-4 years ago your statement would hold SOME water, not anymore. 360/ps3 are fun, PC all the way
Whoa so if anyone can clear this up for me. Which console would be best to play crysis 2. Yea xbox may have 500mhz with 256 mb but in comparison isnt the ps3 way more powerful. Anyone feel free to enlightin me. Cause I was wanting to buy the ps3 version.
@shortway444 What I mean is that if one desires graphics, one should game on pc.However, pc doesn't have much exclusives such as wii/xbox360/ps3.In other words,for multi platform games,go for pc...for exclusives like mario,god of wars,etc ,go for consoles.My advice,go for a console and a gaming pc.Now gaming pcs are cheap,lets say 500$ with Phenomx4 and ati 5770 and you can rip ps360 together easily.So,let's stop fanboys saying that ps3 has better graphics and gaming on pc is expensive.
@shortway444 Haha 400$ a gtx480 which is x20+ powerful than a ps3.Why do I need so much power? If I only can get an ati 5770 which is 140$ and it's x5+ more powerful than a PS3..
@shortway444 Also let's stop the cliche' that developers have difficult time working on the cell,that's why some games are laggy on ps3.The asnwer is simple,the hardware limit is almost on the top(This goes for xbox360 too),so people(critics) don't demand more than a hardware can offer.And for Sony and Microsoft,stop lying consumers because their games are not in full hd but in 720p or less like 640p or even 580p (GTAIV on ps3 ,halo3 on xbox360,etc..)Yes, ps3 has 1080p but only in minigames PSN.
@shortway444 Go and search ps360 frameratre analyser and in any gaming web page and search for HD resolution in consoles and you find than the resolution in most ''heavy'' games from ps360 are 1280x720 and even in sub HD like 640p.Type GTA IV for ps3 at 1184x640 resolution.Even though playing at 720p is nice,stop sony saying that people should buy their 1080p TVs to game if ps3 can't handle it ,ps3 just upscales,so it doens't look that good.
@shortway444 Wow, you really think xbox still beats ps3 when it comes to good games. Hah! Maybe two years ago, but not anymore. Xbox is losing all of it's good exclusives, and ps3 is just getting more and more.
Yeah, pc will always be more powerful then console. Upgrades come out every 6 months, and do not give me that xbox 360 slim crap, it is the same console with a prettier case, which looks like a computer case.
And these are just small scenes made to show off the tech demo, not like the huge areas you see in Crysis 1 on PC. No wonder Crysis 2 will be set in New York its probably because the console frame rates cant handle the full on detail of the jungle envinroment.
Wow 16 fps on tech videos that were designed to run as smoothly as possible to show off ce3 on consoles. Cant wait to see what the final version looks like on consoles after they have taken all the eye candy out in order to sustain a playable framerate.
@Remoth000 That's incorrect, While developers do have to make some compromises with consoles, "massively dumbed down" in an overexaggeration. Optimization allows consoles to output graphics that are still pretty decent for having 5 year old chipsets. To help make my point, I once had Bioshock running on a low end pc on low settings the framerate was unstable and graphically it looked much worse then the 360 version. Even though it was a low end pc, it's specs were higher then a 360.
@Zain844 Not true. An example is texture memory; PCs since 06 have had GPUs that have 2x as much VRAM than what the X360 has in it's GPU. Artists have had to create separate material databases in which textures resolutions are halved for the console. Models are sacrificed too, they switch over to their LOD counterpart twice as early to keep performance stable. Good lighting & visual style hide bad textures and low detail a bit, but optimization is not a trick.
@Zain844 As for the PC you used to run Bioshock, something had to be bottlenecking to cause bad performance. Using any PC isn't going to work. What's strange is that you can have a $500 PC that can do some gaming, & have another that can't. You must have a balanced PC to play games, meaning that if Bioshock was killing your GPU because it's weak, performance will strain. Likewise, having a strong GPU and slow CPU will mean that the slow CPU will strain game performance.
@HostelEffect (continued) so if they already own a PS3 or a 360 why would they spend more money to upgrade their PCs just so they can play the same games that they play on console? Call of Duty Black Ops looks and plays just fine on my 360 and I prefer the Xbox live community over the pc community so tell me, why should i upgrade just to play the same game on PC? If you are a dedicated PC gamer then i get it. for $500 you can build a pc that outperforms a 360.
@HostelEffect however if you already own a console, then i really don't see the point, of upgrading unless you are really into PC exclusives or a major graphics whore, in that case you wouldnt have bought a console anyway. My pc is an off the shelf acer from wal mart with onboard video. It's not a gaming pc but it does everything else i need it to do. so for me it would be more expensive because id have to upgrade.
@HostelEffect and lastly, there is myth propetuated by pc elitists that playing games on consoles is the equivalant of playing them on a PC with low settings. THIS IS FALSE. a 360 can run Lost Planet 2 at a much higher framerate then any low end PC can. same with L4D2 and many other games. Have you seen Oblivion on low settings? it's look god awful compared to the 360 version
Have you even taken a look at what they're actually running? On a lot of pc games, running the game on low means taking all detail textures, normal maps, shadow maps, specular reflections, ect. off of ALL objects, as well as lowering texture resolution and polycount.
On consoles, however, these visual elements are only left on important/close objects. This means that the objects that are close enough for you to see (since console games run at low resolutions) only look good.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
All direct feed videos released so far are from March (I think), whilst the completed version of CryEngine 3 was released in October. This means that it will probably run better than seen here :)
For a more up-to-date video, check Cevat Yerli's IGN interview. I didn't see any slowdown there.
There are some lag in Cevat's gameplay.and it's low framerate... we can't deny it if we have eyes. But this analysis is "video file analysis" Not real game framerate analysis.
1 word
MAXIMUM
capownz 10 months ago
Wow so many acronyms and numbers, you guys, I'm just gonna try and enjoy this game.
Pinoynumber8 11 months ago
I have Xbox360 but I have to upgrade my PC.
DarKSpideR99 1 year ago
A gaming PC is not just for gaming like a console, it's like a console + a PC, thus making it ~$300 more than your normal PC that you likely own. If seen in that perspective, you will realize a gaming PC is no more expensive. Whatever you guys have presumed about PC gaming is incorrect or exaggerated, & I don't know why you continue to challenge PC gamers who naturally know more about it than you. If you are told that you are wrong, it's more than likely that you are wrong.
HostelEffect 1 year ago
@HostelEffect LOL wow spoken like a true pc elitist. Should I bow or curtsy? What you don't understand is that many people just don't like to play games on their PC. People want dedicated hardware something that is used just for gaming. That's where consoles come in. Just because something can play games doesn't make it a console. Your cellphone can play games, does that make it a gaming console? Many people have old outdated PCs that can do everything except play modern games.
Zain844 10 months ago
@Zain844
My PS3 can run Linux, and browse the internet. Is it not a game console?
My Xbox 360 can play HD DVDs. Is it not a gaming console?
My Atari 2600 can program in BASIC. Is it not a gaming console?
My Dreamcast can run an IRC chat client. Is it not a game console?
huntpivot2 10 months ago
max 30fps? 20fps a third of the time? probably not even 720p? probably no AA? analog controller? probably low-quality textures? they better have dumbed this down from a much better pc version! console version of crysis? what a joke....
Remoth000 1 year ago
Will the beach level you showed the first half a minute be in the final game??
Gust0561 1 year ago
@emokiddy666 <--- PS3 fanboys don't know shit about their own console. Pretty sad..
randomdude3824 1 year ago
@randomdude3824 <--- Xbox fanboys know even less about their console.
The Xbox has an x86 processor, dual core, running at about 2 and a half ghz.
The PS3 has a powerpc processor, with 8 cores, and runs slightly faster (Not per core, collectively)
The Xbox has an onboard GPU, that shares memory with the system.
The PS3 also has an onboard GPU, but with dedicated memory. (The dedicated memory in graphics cards is lightyears faster than normal RAM.)
huntpivot2 10 months ago
@huntpivot2 Interesting, however, light years is a measure of length. Not time.......
PulzationZ 9 months ago
@PulzationZ
Exactly. That's why It makes so much sense.
huntpivot2 9 months ago
Yea i agree with that, but ps3 still better than the 360, i hate xbox its awfull in comparison, but xbl is good which is the only reason i have the 360,
emokiddy666 1 year ago
Heres a little thing for u xbox 360 gamers.....YOUR CONSOLE HAS REACHED ITS LIMITATION FOR GRAPHICS AS IT HAS BEEN MAXED OUT, it did an extreemly poor job of running fc2 u really think it will run crysis any better? And well.....ps3 is nowere in the realm of reaching its graphics limitations as not all the power has been tapped, you pc gamers out there should/may agree with me here.
emokiddy666 1 year ago
@emokiddy666 No, Real PC guys wont agree with that. Yes, the CPU in the ps3 WAS powerful 3-4 years ago, but unfortunately, the GPU and RAM in the system are a huge downfall, and actually less advanced than the older 360. Neither system is powerful anymore. I dont know who told you that about "untapped power", it only has 516MB of RAM. It doesn't have a hidden teasure inside, waiting to be found. 3-4 years ago your statement would hold SOME water, not anymore. 360/ps3 are fun, PC all the way
bmx7596 1 year ago
pretty colors @_@
emcsnipez 1 year ago
Whoa so if anyone can clear this up for me. Which console would be best to play crysis 2. Yea xbox may have 500mhz with 256 mb but in comparison isnt the ps3 way more powerful. Anyone feel free to enlightin me. Cause I was wanting to buy the ps3 version.
EvilTediz27 1 year ago
@EvilTediz27 get ps3 youtube video is not always right
u can do some research but get for ps3
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 ps3 is shit in hardware,I experienced it myself.I prefer gaming on pc ,I only hace ps3 for its exclusives.
95928225 1 year ago
@95928225 so.... you get exclusives for ps3 only so that is mean ps3 is not shit.....lol
plus try to experience more carefully and research more on google
i don't think ps3 is shit lol
ps3 got better graphic than xbox and plus it is the second strong one to run this crysis 2 lol
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 What I mean is that if one desires graphics, one should game on pc.However, pc doesn't have much exclusives such as wii/xbox360/ps3.In other words,for multi platform games,go for pc...for exclusives like mario,god of wars,etc ,go for consoles.My advice,go for a console and a gaming pc.Now gaming pcs are cheap,lets say 500$ with Phenomx4 and ati 5770 and you can rip ps360 together easily.So,let's stop fanboys saying that ps3 has better graphics and gaming on pc is expensive.
95928225 1 year ago
@95928225 at least ps3 is not shit lol it is still doing the good job lol and good games on consoles man
like red dead and mortal combat 2010 coming up
so what i mean is consoles is also good at gaming not only pc
period lol so yeah i am still proud for consoles though
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 By the way ,I said fanboys in general ,you wrote you're a fanboy yourself!,I didn't.XD
95928225 1 year ago
@95928225 and i am not a fanboy at all i have both xbox and ps3 and later on in the future lol i will build my own gaming pc
and PLUS! only 500 to make a gaming pc? no man i think you are wrong there
a good nvidia graphic is like 400 lol
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 Haha 400$ a gtx480 which is x20+ powerful than a ps3.Why do I need so much power? If I only can get an ati 5770 which is 140$ and it's x5+ more powerful than a PS3..
95928225 1 year ago 2
@95928225 ps3 is not shit lol actually in fact it is better than xbox lol
but xbox is better than ps3 because of its games lol so yeah
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 Also let's stop the cliche' that developers have difficult time working on the cell,that's why some games are laggy on ps3.The asnwer is simple,the hardware limit is almost on the top(This goes for xbox360 too),so people(critics) don't demand more than a hardware can offer.And for Sony and Microsoft,stop lying consumers because their games are not in full hd but in 720p or less like 640p or even 580p (GTAIV on ps3 ,halo3 on xbox360,etc..)Yes, ps3 has 1080p but only in minigames PSN.
95928225 1 year ago
@95928225 and actually how do you know they are lying to be 1080p and all source of those HD lol
i dont think they are lying at all
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 Go and search ps360 frameratre analyser and in any gaming web page and search for HD resolution in consoles and you find than the resolution in most ''heavy'' games from ps360 are 1280x720 and even in sub HD like 640p.Type GTA IV for ps3 at 1184x640 resolution.Even though playing at 720p is nice,stop sony saying that people should buy their 1080p TVs to game if ps3 can't handle it ,ps3 just upscales,so it doens't look that good.
95928225 1 year ago
@95928225 oh shut up about fanboy xD
but you still get exclusive for ps3 LOL so pse is not shit xD
and how do you know or EVEN THINK! the creators of ps3 putted 1080p games even though they can't do it?
i dont think so man xD LOOOOL but i am still proud for ps3
and IT is still look good for everyone xD
TEEHEE!
shortway444 1 year ago
@shortway444 Wow, you really think xbox still beats ps3 when it comes to good games. Hah! Maybe two years ago, but not anymore. Xbox is losing all of it's good exclusives, and ps3 is just getting more and more.
DDRGURU56 1 year ago
@DDRGURU56 both are great......
i am not on any side of ps3 or either xbox 360
shortway444 1 year ago
@EvilTediz27 Watch ps360 frametare analyser,xbox360 usually gets more frames per second than ps3.
95928225 1 year ago
ps3 fail
pacewilliams 1 year ago
xbox has higher frame rate than ps3 yeah take dat ps3 fanboys
cuban195 1 year ago
PS3 is worse in frames per seconds than xbox....DANG!
SkySavior 1 year ago
Yeah, pc will always be more powerful then console. Upgrades come out every 6 months, and do not give me that xbox 360 slim crap, it is the same console with a prettier case, which looks like a computer case.
SneakRaptor 1 year ago
is this 4 real? (with the fps down the bottom)?
enzo12ify1 1 year ago
THEY SAD THAD THE DID THE PS3 VERSION OF CRYSIS 2 THE BEST BETER THAN A PC BUT I DONT BILEVEIT
grima098 1 year ago
@grima098 What? ENGLISH MOTHA FUCKA, DO YOU SPEAK IT? Lol. Jk.
GraffitiSlammer 1 year ago
@GraffitiSlammer did u get that of a movie with that black guy who plays that black guy in starwars? i can't think of his name and that movie lol
enzo12ify1 1 year ago
@grima098 I DONT BILEVEIT IT EITHER PS3 IS NOT BETER.
Dumbass.
70U1S 1 year ago
so damn fake, why dont u put the fps to 1 or 2 insteed of 30 and 20 u asshole.. consoles get alot more fps than that.
snabb133 1 year ago
your mom gives me more fps than that. trust me.
asdfxyz1 1 year ago
@snabb133 Honestly, I also thought that....late reply though..lol
MrHamzaAsghar 1 year ago
And these are just small scenes made to show off the tech demo, not like the huge areas you see in Crysis 1 on PC. No wonder Crysis 2 will be set in New York its probably because the console frame rates cant handle the full on detail of the jungle envinroment.
pelvist 1 year ago
30 fps indoors at the most what if theres a mulitplayer going on wih 10 other guys or w,e i can never see crysis on a console unless they ruin it
progameruk1 1 year ago 5
@progameruk1 This is the earliest gameplay footage of Crysis 2... They will improve it quite a lot :D
freidian 1 year ago
Wow 16 fps on tech videos that were designed to run as smoothly as possible to show off ce3 on consoles. Cant wait to see what the final version looks like on consoles after they have taken all the eye candy out in order to sustain a playable framerate.
pelvist 1 year ago
lol 360 and ps3 vesion looks like a crysis mods^^
tokesa 2 years ago 3
The Xbpx 360 has a 500mhz GFX card with 256 mb of Vram.
That's like running Crysis at full detail on a 6 year old card.
That chipset was designed for HL2, not CRYSIS.
I'm suprised the damn Xbox doesn't catch on fire, some of that's probably rendering on-cpu...
huntpivot2 2 years ago 8
@huntpivot2 well it'll probably be on low, or possibley medium settings for xbox and ps3
halflifefan84 1 year ago
@halflifefan84 consoles us cry engine 3 pc uses cry engine 2 the cry engine 3 is a modified cry engine 2
TheProjectrgx 1 year ago
@TheProjectrgx ok.
halflifefan84 1 year ago
@huntpivot2 It has the GPU of a 7800GTX and a 3GHz Triple Core processor, it will do fine on medium ;)
halflifefan84 1 year ago
@huntpivot2 It's called optimization look it up.
Zain844 1 year ago
@Zain844 optimization is just another word for "massively dumbed down"
Remoth000 1 year ago
@Remoth000 That's incorrect, While developers do have to make some compromises with consoles, "massively dumbed down" in an overexaggeration. Optimization allows consoles to output graphics that are still pretty decent for having 5 year old chipsets. To help make my point, I once had Bioshock running on a low end pc on low settings the framerate was unstable and graphically it looked much worse then the 360 version. Even though it was a low end pc, it's specs were higher then a 360.
Zain844 1 year ago
@Zain844 Not true. An example is texture memory; PCs since 06 have had GPUs that have 2x as much VRAM than what the X360 has in it's GPU. Artists have had to create separate material databases in which textures resolutions are halved for the console. Models are sacrificed too, they switch over to their LOD counterpart twice as early to keep performance stable. Good lighting & visual style hide bad textures and low detail a bit, but optimization is not a trick.
HostelEffect 1 year ago
@Zain844 As for the PC you used to run Bioshock, something had to be bottlenecking to cause bad performance. Using any PC isn't going to work. What's strange is that you can have a $500 PC that can do some gaming, & have another that can't. You must have a balanced PC to play games, meaning that if Bioshock was killing your GPU because it's weak, performance will strain. Likewise, having a strong GPU and slow CPU will mean that the slow CPU will strain game performance.
HostelEffect 1 year ago
@HostelEffect (continued) so if they already own a PS3 or a 360 why would they spend more money to upgrade their PCs just so they can play the same games that they play on console? Call of Duty Black Ops looks and plays just fine on my 360 and I prefer the Xbox live community over the pc community so tell me, why should i upgrade just to play the same game on PC? If you are a dedicated PC gamer then i get it. for $500 you can build a pc that outperforms a 360.
Zain844 10 months ago
@HostelEffect however if you already own a console, then i really don't see the point, of upgrading unless you are really into PC exclusives or a major graphics whore, in that case you wouldnt have bought a console anyway. My pc is an off the shelf acer from wal mart with onboard video. It's not a gaming pc but it does everything else i need it to do. so for me it would be more expensive because id have to upgrade.
Zain844 10 months ago
@Zain844
So, and excuse me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting that PC is an inferior platform because you don't see the point in spending money on them?
huntpivot2 10 months ago
@HostelEffect and lastly, there is myth propetuated by pc elitists that playing games on consoles is the equivalant of playing them on a PC with low settings. THIS IS FALSE. a 360 can run Lost Planet 2 at a much higher framerate then any low end PC can. same with L4D2 and many other games. Have you seen Oblivion on low settings? it's look god awful compared to the 360 version
Zain844 10 months ago
@Zain844
Have you even taken a look at what they're actually running? On a lot of pc games, running the game on low means taking all detail textures, normal maps, shadow maps, specular reflections, ect. off of ALL objects, as well as lowering texture resolution and polycount.
On consoles, however, these visual elements are only left on important/close objects. This means that the objects that are close enough for you to see (since console games run at low resolutions) only look good.
huntpivot2 10 months ago
@huntpivot2 Actually, it's worse. It's not 256MB of VRAM, it's 10MiB (same as MB) of eDRAM at 256GB/s. It's a good concept, but very poorly executed.
waiotlonewolf 11 months ago
oha......das ist hart... sieht mal extrem aus....da kommt ja nix hintrher(grafisch)...ich denk das schafft net mal ne HD5970 auf 1920x1080...o.O
naja kommt halt aus Deutschland :D
Crysis for Ever ...
unbee73 2 years ago
my computer can't. i will buy it for 360
lasagnaEATER 2 years ago
this was fail console get high fps then that
67CopperHead 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All direct feed videos released so far are from March (I think), whilst the completed version of CryEngine 3 was released in October. This means that it will probably run better than seen here :)
For a more up-to-date video, check Cevat Yerli's IGN interview. I didn't see any slowdown there.
esnedon 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@esnedon
There are some lag in Cevat's gameplay.and it's low framerate... we can't deny it if we have eyes. But this analysis is "video file analysis" Not real game framerate analysis.
kigamitya 2 years ago
It is special algorithms to detect unique frames. What is measured is the framerate of what is rendered in the video.
VideoTubeStation 2 years ago 3
so now there is a stargate in crysis now
j7x54 2 years ago 4
It is just a techdemo running on consoles.
VideoTubeStation 2 years ago 4