I highly doubt that they are 250,000 and u are so angered about this that you went to racism. Okay man u win...to bad you cant afford a camera period. So stop studying things you'll never have. Now like I said....u were looking at this video for a reason so obviously u are trying to get one lol
@Bluestarcinema Yeah no shit asshole, but we all don't have a few grand to spend on film, processing, etc. There are many "real" movies shot digital and many people make a pleasing look on dv and hdv. If you don't like it then watch something else and go eat ten dicks.
@Bluestarcinema dude...crank 2 was shot on a digital camera....who knows wtf ur talking about. U thinking to much into what a film should look like. some people see things like this as perfect. if u like film so damn much u fuckin prick why are u looking at videos like this for....now think about that!
@Bluestarcinema ok that's fine lol. but the point is ....most people cant tell the difference.... cameras like these are good enough for what people are trying to do. just because u have a sick gay fetish for some 20 thousand dollar camera don't try to ruin it for other people. by the way...crank was actually shot on the cheap less than 1000 dollar cameras lol. later fag boy
@pacmanlegend every one in the professional cinema world can tell the difference. the only people that can't tell the difference are cock knockers like yourself who think cinema camera's are worth $20,000.
try $250,000.
now go watch your faggot crank movie and jerk off to the niggers.
Nice but the film look is mostly what you put in front of the camera, not what you do in post, nor even the camera. The indoor scenes need better lighting. The difference between film and digital is that there is a better sense of 3Dness. That is achieved not only with DOF (35mm lenses) but also with good lighting. Good Work anyways!
He is trying to give advice. Its not hating unless they have something to add. I agree. More light is necessary. Its a step in the right direction. Good work.
I'm enjoying your progression. I am an infant in this and I'm seeing the achievements are endless. I am conducting lighting tests right now. I will be glad when I'm @ this stage.
we could probably work together, minus the pretentious tone you seem to speak with; if it's not so, my mistake. "Do you JUST do" means exactly That! I didn't see any other videos from you except Claymation, hence I asked did you JUST do that; don't YOU get offended by it. *smiley face* and if you had/have more, I failed to see because I Am busy looking at dp reels, shopping around for a camera and polishing one of my scripts.
I'm a writer, I write all genres, styles, did some journalism before. But I also direct and coach acting. Gotta have the film, story, acting etc down before all the glitter, BUT, the right look does go hand in hand.
It looks good because, of the content and the music for the most part this was shot with 24 p and cine look features giving it that motion blur.
there was no over exposure except for the plane windows.
naturally lit and with a romantic feeling to it all the shaky makes it feel a little close to home as does its characters they look into the lens allot. reminds me of a death cab video "i will posses your heart"
This has been flagged as spam show
I highly doubt that they are 250,000 and u are so angered about this that you went to racism. Okay man u win...to bad you cant afford a camera period. So stop studying things you'll never have. Now like I said....u were looking at this video for a reason so obviously u are trying to get one lol
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
Nice. I liked it. Specially the girl xD
ElPandaDeLaAccion 1 year ago
this doesnt look look film, it looks like home DV.
to get the look of film you have to shoot with film, and thats just the bottom line.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema Yeah no shit asshole, but we all don't have a few grand to spend on film, processing, etc. There are many "real" movies shot digital and many people make a pleasing look on dv and hdv. If you don't like it then watch something else and go eat ten dicks.
minarovich 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema are u serious? lol this is 100% purely wrong. U need good color correcters....24p....
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@pacmanlegend no You are wrong.
Digital doesn't include film grain, film texture, regulation movement, dust, unique color pallet, and 14 stops of exposure lattitude.
and most importantly 18 mega pixels worth of resolution per frame (35mm) and 110 mega pixels per frame (70mm IMAX)
make sure you know what your talking about before you talk out of your ass.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema dude...crank 2 was shot on a digital camera....who knows wtf ur talking about. U thinking to much into what a film should look like. some people see things like this as perfect. if u like film so damn much u fuckin prick why are u looking at videos like this for....now think about that!
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@pacmanlegend crank 2 is a joke, crank 2 has nothing on the dark knight and inception (both shot in 65mm)
nice QQ faggot.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema ok that's fine lol. but the point is ....most people cant tell the difference.... cameras like these are good enough for what people are trying to do. just because u have a sick gay fetish for some 20 thousand dollar camera don't try to ruin it for other people. by the way...crank was actually shot on the cheap less than 1000 dollar cameras lol. later fag boy
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@pacmanlegend every one in the professional cinema world can tell the difference. the only people that can't tell the difference are cock knockers like yourself who think cinema camera's are worth $20,000.
try $250,000.
now go watch your faggot crank movie and jerk off to the niggers.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
Comment removed
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema 21 megapixel u mean lol.
AllThingsKen 2 months ago
N/M got the song: Chris Botti - ever since we met
kernel16 2 years ago
Looks good, but I'm really more interested in the song, pls ty.
kernel16 2 years ago
Nice but the film look is mostly what you put in front of the camera, not what you do in post, nor even the camera. The indoor scenes need better lighting. The difference between film and digital is that there is a better sense of 3Dness. That is achieved not only with DOF (35mm lenses) but also with good lighting. Good Work anyways!
Aaron Escobar
Cinematographer
Escobar Studios
aaron1a12 2 years ago
Stop hating he did a good job!
fry112 2 years ago
He is trying to give advice. Its not hating unless they have something to add. I agree. More light is necessary. Its a step in the right direction. Good work.
ThingsThatVexMe 2 years ago
What is The Camera ?
cmmovie 2 years ago
whtats the song?
kurtrupisan 2 years ago
I'm enjoying your progression. I am an infant in this and I'm seeing the achievements are endless. I am conducting lighting tests right now. I will be glad when I'm @ this stage.
linkruiz 2 years ago
Amazing like real movies what camera is this ?! does a Sony HD handcam give the same ?? O.o ? huh O.o ?
pianolla1 2 years ago
good but use a steadier cam
Dungxy 2 years ago 2
What effects work best to achieve this look in Vegas?
CloudINC00 2 years ago
Comment removed
kelvintwt 2 years ago
doesnt look good! i liked more 1st and 2nd attempt
Toonamik 2 years ago
You're basically perfect. You just need the camera movements to be even smoother and steadier.
supertom123 2 years ago
The point is environment , you can't just film on dark room and put then nice color correction this will be s***.
pediamuusika 2 years ago
That looks fantastic.
nublackmusic 2 years ago
ITS not just lighting ....If you want this effect ....they use this in real movie films...its called Colour correction
You can use colour correction in final cut pro/express .etc. or sony vegas and adobe after affects ..
XxDiNeVsKixX 3 years ago
lighting lighting lighting...
oskararnarson 3 years ago
we could probably work together, minus the pretentious tone you seem to speak with; if it's not so, my mistake. "Do you JUST do" means exactly That! I didn't see any other videos from you except Claymation, hence I asked did you JUST do that; don't YOU get offended by it. *smiley face* and if you had/have more, I failed to see because I Am busy looking at dp reels, shopping around for a camera and polishing one of my scripts.
Salut.
Oplexicon 3 years ago
do you just do claymation?
Oplexicon 3 years ago
I agree with you 100%.
I'm a writer, I write all genres, styles, did some journalism before. But I also direct and coach acting. Gotta have the film, story, acting etc down before all the glitter, BUT, the right look does go hand in hand.
Oplexicon 3 years ago
This looks great!
jazmcd 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good work man
nozlrecordingsuk 3 years ago
Bravo, Anthony! This video clip is superb!
johansopiee 3 years ago
muy buen video, saludos de argentina..
pomboenpedo 3 years ago
good job, keep going
lkabird 3 years ago
Looks good, but you can't shoot every scene with just a 50mm lens.Different lenses will add much more production values to your work.I liked it.
LuvhandleR 3 years ago
Very nice. A little more stabilization might have made this really great, but as is, it's pretty golden.
Theraven1138 3 years ago
the set design is very elegant and homey not to mention had a great depth of field look to it im curious was that the lens or the zoom
JoshuaPowless 3 years ago
It looks good because, of the content and the music for the most part this was shot with 24 p and cine look features giving it that motion blur.
there was no over exposure except for the plane windows.
naturally lit and with a romantic feeling to it all the shaky makes it feel a little close to home as does its characters they look into the lens allot. reminds me of a death cab video "i will posses your heart"
JoshuaPowless 3 years ago
What did you use? A special adapter? What video camera did you use? What settings? What settings on vegas did you use?
Writermo1 3 years ago
why does this camcorder actually look good when it is shaky and DV-cam look like shit?
And why does this video don't show any de-interlacing artifacts?
mmmmm
Schizophrenik7 3 years ago
looks really good..
rezakusunglima 3 years ago
coz its progressive
ermetekos 3 years ago
very gooD!
XHProductions 3 years ago
hey great job!
EZA757 3 years ago