Spot on.And don’t worry about the hateful comments from the leftist “Progressives”. They’re just worried because the internet is setting us all free. They no longer dominate the propaganda. The status quo is loosing control. Individual liberty will rule this nation again. Afraid the tree of liberty may yet still need some watering however.
@kromed01 He was either a Fascist or a Communist. They're two completely different ideologies completely on the opposite end of the extreme spectrum. That's why the two cannot thrive as one. Fascism is basically the industry and military control the government whereas Communism the government controls everything, which is what OhImGonnaVomit is trying to establish here in the states, a communistic government. But, to make it short, Stalin was a tyrannical communist dictator.
@realwolfcry No, you have it wrong! The two Ideologies are NOT on the opposite ends of the spectrum. Facscism is still SOCIALISM... Hitler's party was the Democrat SOCIALIST Party. And both Facism and Communism lead to TYRANNY. Consider that to the left of the spectrum is TYRANNY and to the right of the spectrum is ANARCHY. Where you really want to be is in the middle. That is EXACTLY where our Founders wanted us to be with the USA Constitution.
@stoogemaniac Big government can produce a better society say you take Norway for example which has a surplus of cash due to its basic socialist structure which gives the country the ability to create jobs and wealth for the country separate of the private sector.
@kromed01 There's really no comparison between a country like Norway and the United States, which has 1/3rd of a billion people. Norway has 1/3rd the population of the County of Los Angeles in California. Socialism on a grand scale is a proven failure in places like the USSR and the Peoples Republic of China. Socialism works fine in places like Finland as long you don't mind owning next to nothing.
@stoogemaniac Imagine if Enron was nationalised. You wouldnt have had the corruption, price fixing etc and most of all you wouldnt have had all the contracts sent over seas. America could have probably created 5 million jobs by nationalising it. Socialism has not been a failure in most countries it has been in. The USSR and China are not socialist they are communist. If you actually think people in Finland own next to nothing you are naive.
@kromed01 You're naive. Every business in Mexico is nationalized and that country is one of the most corrupt on earth. Venezuela is another fine example of nationalization
@stoogemaniac So Mexico and Venezuela are corrupt in comparison to America where every President since Kennedy has been a bought and paid for puppet of David Rockefeller and the Miliatary Industrial Complex? American government corruption has lead the the deaths of hundreds of millions of people to satisfy the profitering by the oil companies and weapons manufacturers.
@kromed01 Mexico and Venezuela are far more corrupt than America. Hugo Chavez is rich now because of his suppression of the people, just like Fidel Castro, a multi-billionaire. Yes, America is corrupt, but not as bad as socialist countries. And America is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, but not hundreds of millions. Only communist countries can rack up a death toll like that.
@kromed01 The # of people in Norway is hugely less than the USA. I have several Norwegians as clients and guess where they all want to live??? In the US of A.
This is great, the truth be told!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SCOOPNJ78 6 months ago
It's obvious to anyone with a working brain...there IS a communist in the white house.
sqweezel 6 months ago 2
Spot on.And don’t worry about the hateful comments from the leftist “Progressives”. They’re just worried because the internet is setting us all free. They no longer dominate the propaganda. The status quo is loosing control. Individual liberty will rule this nation again. Afraid the tree of liberty may yet still need some watering however.
abcshopper 6 months ago
Spot on.
abcshopper 6 months ago
How childish and incorrect. Stalin was a facist communist dictator.
kromed01 6 months ago 2
@kromed01 He was either a Fascist or a Communist. They're two completely different ideologies completely on the opposite end of the extreme spectrum. That's why the two cannot thrive as one. Fascism is basically the industry and military control the government whereas Communism the government controls everything, which is what OhImGonnaVomit is trying to establish here in the states, a communistic government. But, to make it short, Stalin was a tyrannical communist dictator.
realwolfcry 6 months ago
@realwolfcry No, you have it wrong! The two Ideologies are NOT on the opposite ends of the spectrum. Facscism is still SOCIALISM... Hitler's party was the Democrat SOCIALIST Party. And both Facism and Communism lead to TYRANNY. Consider that to the left of the spectrum is TYRANNY and to the right of the spectrum is ANARCHY. Where you really want to be is in the middle. That is EXACTLY where our Founders wanted us to be with the USA Constitution.
swimkin 6 months ago 2
@kromed01 But their ideologies were basically the same. Both fans of big government.
stoogemaniac 6 months ago
@stoogemaniac Big government can produce a better society say you take Norway for example which has a surplus of cash due to its basic socialist structure which gives the country the ability to create jobs and wealth for the country separate of the private sector.
kromed01 6 months ago
@kromed01 There's really no comparison between a country like Norway and the United States, which has 1/3rd of a billion people. Norway has 1/3rd the population of the County of Los Angeles in California. Socialism on a grand scale is a proven failure in places like the USSR and the Peoples Republic of China. Socialism works fine in places like Finland as long you don't mind owning next to nothing.
stoogemaniac 6 months ago
@stoogemaniac Imagine if Enron was nationalised. You wouldnt have had the corruption, price fixing etc and most of all you wouldnt have had all the contracts sent over seas. America could have probably created 5 million jobs by nationalising it. Socialism has not been a failure in most countries it has been in. The USSR and China are not socialist they are communist. If you actually think people in Finland own next to nothing you are naive.
kromed01 6 months ago
@kromed01 You're naive. Every business in Mexico is nationalized and that country is one of the most corrupt on earth. Venezuela is another fine example of nationalization
stoogemaniac 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
kromed01 6 months ago
@stoogemaniac So Mexico and Venezuela are corrupt in comparison to America where every President since Kennedy has been a bought and paid for puppet of David Rockefeller and the Miliatary Industrial Complex? American government corruption has lead the the deaths of hundreds of millions of people to satisfy the profitering by the oil companies and weapons manufacturers.
kromed01 6 months ago
@kromed01 Thanks for the boring repetition of tired left-wing talking points. You're welcome to take them elsewhere.
stoogemaniac 6 months ago
@kromed01 Mexico and Venezuela are far more corrupt than America. Hugo Chavez is rich now because of his suppression of the people, just like Fidel Castro, a multi-billionaire. Yes, America is corrupt, but not as bad as socialist countries. And America is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, but not hundreds of millions. Only communist countries can rack up a death toll like that.
zapthycat 6 months ago
@kromed01 The # of people in Norway is hugely less than the USA. I have several Norwegians as clients and guess where they all want to live??? In the US of A.
Leilanie1235 6 months ago