Added: 3 years ago
From: EVARealUsers
Views: 3,259
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If EMC wants to put its CX4 against the latest EVA and run tests that typical storage adminstrators perform on a regular bases to see which is easier to administer, then we are willing to do it. EMC knows the EVA is easier to manage than the CX4. It's not a secret.

  • Some were HP resellers and some were HP customers... But none of them had ever used an EVA or EMC box. That was the whole point of the test -- of course your guy can make the EMC CX seem easy. That is not a test. A juggler makes juggling look easy.

  • Yeah well that guy was me. I also had no prior storage management experience. So in a way I'm your perfect candidate. No doubt things like creating a LUN and expanding it are very easy on the EVA. But boy when it comes to more advanced stuff I had a different experience. For example, creating a demand-allocated snap with containers so I don't lose them easy? I don't think so! Oh and how do I get 'hot LUNs' onto the Flash drives on the new EVAs for example? Clones? Easy? Yeah right.

  • These are experts performing the tests. In the HP test, the users had no use of the EMC or HP storage system. That was a true test of simplicity. This one seems canned.

  • The folks who tested the EVA and CX were HP resellers. Well at least 5 of the 6. I hope they would know a thing or two about managing things they sell.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more