Global Warming: The Truth

[WAX6428]

Al Gore sucks and is a big fat liar. He just needs a means of employment and this is it. Lying and cashing in.

[PTR01981]

@terrymorse Global warming is the same type lie as swine flu - just because it isn't true doesn't mean that the politicians and the newspapers won't talk about it, so don't show pieces of text because it doesn't prove anything.

[drinkbudyXD]

look on the bright side our fuel wont last long enough to kill ourselves ,so true or not it doesn't really matter,we do more harm as a species than just emit co2 with factory's and farts

[fireofenergy]

Soooo much "intellectual" babber. Means NOTHING! (because the effects of GW would not be felt until well AFTER the beginning of the 21st century).

Most people KNOW that CO2 is an infrared absorber.

Most people know that humanity has accelerated its count by 40% in a geologic blink. About 120 CUBIC MILES FF's was converted into CO2. (DISPUTE THAT !)

Weather is not yet a "proof" (even though it will snow more at first).

Solar CSP and PV, wind and or closed cycle nuclear is the solution...

[checkthewreck]

everyone regurgitates information they have learned from books from their classroom (supplied by your government) or from newspapers (supplied by your government) or from the news channels (supplied and funded by your government). the majority of scientists freely admit that everything is a THEORY. the evolution theory, the big bang theory ITS NOT SOLID PROOF. wake up everybody, its the biggest con since the pope said condoms dont stop AIDS. i cant believe sooo many people have brought it.

[MillerMachinima]

its bullshit...if you look at it co2 follows heat...the heat goes up and it makes the plants "perspire" more mt.saint helens emited more co2 in the days it let off more co2 than humans ever have in the history of EVER

[terrymorse]

@MillerMachinima "mt.saint helens emited more co2 in the days it let off more co2 than humans ever have in the history of EVER"

Really? Let's look at some evidence...

Annual CO2 from volcanic activity worldwide: 200 million tons (US Geological Survey)

Annual CO2 form fossil fuel consumption worldwide: 26.8 billion tons (US Dept. of Energy)

Conclusion: CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning is two orders of magnitude greater than volcanic emissions.

[brianleal87]

a "hoax"?- dude, ur a moron/ it DOES get hotter every year/ the only thing that's evolved over the earth's years is man/ man are burning the ozone now more than ever due to constant refinery pollution and burning fossil fuels/ the FACT is that refinery locations are the most heated locations around the globe due to huge smoke towers burning the ozone-we are living in record breaking heat conditions over 1000's of years/ it won't JUST GO AWAY

[postchevelle]

Total garbage paid for by the Lib Agenda.

[pistolen87]

I'm not sure if global warming is propaganda or not, to get a fair opinion on the matter I need to hear both sides arguments and facts.

What is shocking is that the people who dosn't belive in it, have no say in the media. It seems like there is a general concensus on the matter, and when only one side of the story is told, people will believe whatever they are hearing.

So, give me a debate on the subject, so I can make up my own mind on the matter, not whatever media say's true.

[Richard482]

An interesting article from the July edition of the BBC Focus Magazine. It says astronomers say the Sun is the 'quietest' it has been for almost 100 years. There is also a 50-year low in the solar wind pressure. It has been going through a cooling down period for the last 20 years and yet overall global temperatures are still rising. So increased sun activity cannot be blamed for the rise in Earth's temperatures.

[freereeder]

It's all said in previous comments...but keep up the great work. "Global warming" is bunk.

[felixq78]

Much of the so called scientific evidence that these Oil Corp Lackies present has been discredited. It's BULLSHIT.

[GreenRiver72]

Same can be said about IPCC research, after all most of the 2500 were not even scientists, and the vast majority of the writers were lobbyists or activists. Scientific Rebuttal welcomed.

[SincereConcern]

One cannot provide a scientific rebuttal to your claim. One can only clarify what the IPCC is and does.

Contrary to populat misconception, the IPCC doesn't conduct any research.

Since 1988 it has reviewed the published, peer-reviewed literature and then written an assessment. The written text of the report goes through a series of internal peer-review and is reviewed by UN member states as well before it is approved.

[BayouBoy425]

Also contrary to popular misconception, the IPCC is funded by governments and composed primarily of activists and social scientists. Their resultant bias is to imply the situation is as bad as can be stated without their losing credibility, so as to push political agendas.

[SincereConcern]

It is indeed funded by governments—probably because governments would like to be informed if there is any possibility of danger. It would be *irresponsible* to not be concerned about climate change implications (e.g. food security).

[GreenRiver72]

If the governments supporting the IPCC wanted to be informed through the least-biased scientific truth of climate change, then why do they fund a body that is primarily sociologists and activists? Fair-minded scientists in the atmospheric field recognize human activity likely contributes to micro and global scale changes. But to say (given current knowledge of the subject) that humans are the primary influence or will likely trigger irreversible feedbacks is irresponsible.

[SincereConcern]

The govts *nominate* who they want to be in the IPCC, and are then chosen on their expertise. There are more scientific expert reviewers than authors.

There are reasonable threats of looping effects: the pinebeetle in the N. Amer. boreal forests and the methane-containing, melting permafrost of Siberia.

Some enviro issues can only be explained by human activity: the plastic in the N. Pacific gyre & the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico from agribusiness runoff.

[BayouBoy425]

Again most of the IPCC is composed of social scientists/activists NOT atmospheric scientists. If you do not see a conflict of interest given that this board is advertised as the standard of scientific views on the topic you have compromised your credibility.

Reasonable threats do exist, they should be presented by the IPCC.

Some enviro issues can only be explained by human activity, including (sub)/urbanization heat effects around many of the surface obs;

while IR sat data shows little warming.

[algoreisgod]

We need nuclear winter.

[cucheran666]

i dont think its co2 but there is a problem with air polutuion in our cities and an even bigger problem with over population....i dont think global warming it true per say but we do need cleaner ways of doin things more reaserch in to fuel cells and other ways of energy production would be nice

[verminslayer]

LOL I love that photo shop picture of Al Gore Melting the ice with a flame thrower. HA HA HA

[verminslayer]

Great Video, Im so sick of arguing with idiots who eat up all the sensationalist bullshit. Until it is proven beyond any doubt that Global Warming is caused by human activity. I remain a skeptic.

[Catoni52]

Excellent video. There appears to be more and more films exposing the Global Warming Alarmists as nothing more then naive idealists, or else left-wing propagandists. Climate Change is normal. Any effect we might have is minuscule. There have been many, many warmings and coolings. There will be many many more.

[TRUMPHENT]

What inverted dislogic this video presents. For the first time in geologic history, CO2 is being artificially injected into the atmosphere at an ever increasing rate. The oceans are net CO2 sink. It has changed ph by -0.1. These crackpot paid shills are still claiming no global warming. Worse yet, some people believe them.

[BozalliCopter]

i agree with tylerrrrr9483- find one peice of good evidence it is happening. Bareley any of the atmosphere is co2, and only a tiny fraction of that is emitted by us.

people need to stop swallowing this theory without question. Some people just assume that there are no scientists who think its no happening- untrue.

[arleenm69]

global warming by co2 alone is a lie. its just another way of making money.

[jhazard333]

CO2 has a great amount of devastating effects, it reflects the suns rays that warm the earth, the more CO2 the more the sun is relected resulting in a drop in temperature. The amount of CO2 pumped in the air each day reaches the mark of 700 MILLION tons. this is a 350% increase since the 1920's when automobiles were booming, look at the facts, we are killing ourselves, which would you rather do, emit millions of tons of CO2 and die, or look to another way and live, think about it.

[tylerrrr9483]

c02 makes up 3% of the greenhouse gases we contribute only about 1% out of that 3. plus their is no direct correlation between c02 and raising temperature.

[terrymorse]

@jhazard333 "CO2...reflects the suns rays that warm the earth"

CO2 is transparent to visible light, neither reflecting nor absorbing sunlight. It does absorb infrared radiation, trapping the heat from being radiated from the earth's surface to space.

[Nichen]

People believe what they want to believe. You're a bunch of ignorant fuckheads, all of you who dare to deny climate change.

[AlexanderRaccoon]

Not change, man-made climate change. And we are wanting a number of options discussed

[grubelsucht]

The focus on CO2 did not explain melting polar ice caps and glaciers, rising sea temperatures, and the abrupt increase in hurricanes and hurricanes in areas not known to have hurricanes. So scientists do not all agree. Maybe these scientists are the counterpart of those biologists who do not believe evolution of species. Sorry, not convinced. Strong business and political interests would like to deny global warming just as religious interests would like to deny evolution.

[saneaspossible]

I just have this comment: go to Google video and search for: Scam of the "Great Global Warming Swindle" Watch that video and make your conclusions.

[moronpolice]

Global warming scam is just a plan to kill the American economy and balance it with the rest of the world. It happened in the 70's and it is happening again. Every 30 years or so it happens. Value of the dollar drops...gas price rises...goods and services go up... tax rates go up..etc Elect Barack Obama so we can finally hit bottom. There will be real change after his one term of destroying america and the world economy

[Yankeedoowop]

Maybe Obama can be our next Jimmy Carter. Then we'll see Reagan 2. God I hope so.

[PFTECHMETAL]

Just a few simple thoughts. Keeping in mind that global warming is a scam.

The lobotomy got the nobel prize.

Our planet is fucking polluted and as soon as the sheep find out that global warming is a lie the planet really will be up shit creek.

[bobbyseatbobs]

omg this is sad i have seen no profe that it isnt true. just evidince that the people that say its true have exatrated it btw would you belive this something on you tube or a movie? Its sad i bet you this was funded by a car company.

[simpifjonk]

the world has gone really mad, everyone should see this.

[massormedgetter1337]

this is totally bullshit. Everyone should see that. Cause why havent this theory been presented on the news for example...

[georgiatechisnumber1]

How many conservative news chanels do u know of? ONE. Fox News, which has presented this.

[massormedgetter1337]

Im just saying he got a nobel prise for it so they have to be siting on the hard fact. If there would have been any doubts then i dont think countries would make environmental agreement with him how to lower their bad discharges

[SpoonFilms]

Who cares if he got a nobel prize? That doesn't make it true! And the countries agreeing with him are being led by propaganda.

[massormedgetter1337]

seriously? u mean that he didnt get the nobel prise for a reason? dont u think they have done some research before giving him it? im not sayin that this vid is wrong, its a theory but the leading scientists in the world thinks that Gores theory is much more realistic.

[SpoonFilms]

What scientists? ost of the scientists in the world agree that The Earth is going through a natural cycle and CO2 has nothing todo with Climate change.

[BagpipeHustler]

i bet Gore didn't even win that prize. i bet it's all a bullshit rumor.

[massormedgetter1337]

well he did..you know they broadcasted it on TV

[BagpipeHustler]

hahaha even still, i don't think he did.

[massormedgetter1337]

hahah okei....so u think like the swedish king agreed to create a fake nobel price ceremoni for gore just to fuck with u:p?

[TheNevillerobson]

@massormedgetter1337 Because assholes like you cant understand. Big Al is making a cartoon soon. watch that instaed. Prick

[joellypolly]

dude u dont have any idea do you... the earth is REALLY OLD not 6000 years dude

[dmdrummer23]

Global warming is bullshit-- the earth is only like 6000 years old, THE BIBLE SAYS so you god damn jew commies!!! ___HAIL JESUS___

[SpoonFilms]

Dude, did you really just use the lord's name in vain while hailing Jesus. Isn't that kind of hypocritical, hmm?

[dmdrummer23]

that was a joke.

[SpoonFilms]

Oh, sorry, sarcasm doesn't really translate well in text. haha.

[martendep]

Man is not to blame -- You, me the commoners.

Why not look at the corporations first who researched, engineered, marketted and sold us these greenhouse gas producing products?

[MagentaTrue]

ANTARCTIC ICE GROWS TO RECORD SIZE

It is now at 16.17 million sq. km.

The old record is 16.03 million sq. km

And the Antarctic is still growing.

In Al Gore's predictions this wasn't supposed to happen.

[terrymorse]

@MagentaTrue "ANTARCTIC ICE GROWS TO RECORD SIZE"

"...sea ice is not the most important thing to measure. In Antarctica, the most important ice mass is the land ice..recent estimates indicate a contribution of between 0.27 mm/year and 0.83 mm/year (of sea level rise) coming from Antarctica...Antarctica is losing land ice as a whole, and these losses are accelerating quickly."

- John Cook, Skeptical Science 2010

[metalheaddude]

i do not believe that the earth is older than 6,000-7,000 years(so please don't get on my case about it lol) but i believe that global warming and global cooling is a natural process. so id thought id have a little say :)

[pheil58]

Their junk science held up for a while..because they got lucky and caught a warming trend...now their flawed computer models are being exposed...hasnt warmed in ten years and dropped dramatically last year...Thats why the term CLIMATE CHANGE is replacing GLOBAL WARMING..........because its not warming!!!! ..oops

[xLordPoox]

This is such a rip off from the great global warming swindle. Why couldn't you at least give credit to that movie instead of posting it here as if you created it?

[georgiatechisnumber1]

I did give credit to the movie, look at the very end.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

I did give credit to the movie, look at the very end.

[bimmjim]

Denile is a river in Antarctica.

[lazomaniac]

global warming is a lie, it's just an excuse for all the catastrophes THEY are causing (CHEMTRAILS)

[shadowlife44]

Everything said in this video is remarkably true. It matches up exactly with my reserch I have done on Global Warming.

[bioshockingguitar]

anyone who its real is an idiot! the anartic has beaten the record of ice by more than an inch,that proves its not real

[ilovesesshy315]

WOOO!!!! you rock georgiatechisnumber1!!!!!! GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT CAUSED BY US DAMN IT! i support you 100% you rule! make more videos! show these people the TRUTH!!!!!!!

[tomboynaturefreak]

there are way more comments for vidios that state global warming is real! uh, cause it is real!!!!!!!!!!

[TheRealArchAngel]

500 years more people would have believed the earth was flat then round. Does it make the Flat Earth Belief "real"?

[bioshockingguitar]

idiot,no its not,listen to the damn video

[tomboynaturefreak]

please look at comments for the vidio global warming:keep holding on. people who comment there want arguments from people who dont believe in global warming. it is real!!!

[mtnus]

crappy al gore....

never heard of ice times?

its a natural movement in temperature!

we just had an ice time, so we're gonna warm up now and cool down very much in an few thousand years.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

What I find really stupid is that they are having a global warming confernece in India. The CO2 produced from everyone getting there and back equals the same amount that the country of Chad produces anually

[georgiatechisnumber1]

There is no way to prove that the heating up is caused by humans. The earth's climate has so many factors we can and can't measure. Global Warming needs some significant evidence if they truly wanted to prove humans are at fault.

If Global Warming was a threat to us in the next hundred or so years, Al Gore would stop using 4 times the average CO2 production (only one of his homes) and would stop using a private jet

[TheRealArchAngel]

Thier junk Science says that "Co2 in the Atmosphere traps heat that is reflected off the earth,bounces off the top of the atmosphere and then back off the earth until it's finally released. More Co2 = more Heat trapped" via Co2 via "vibrations."..lol. Of course the "lay folk" hearing the Environut say this may not realize that is how Radiowaves and Microwaves work but Heat is trapped in the Oceans & Land & radiates up to heat the Air above the area via Convection..but politics = misinformation

[mustangfgtan15]

man made GW doesnt exist. It's just the cycle of earth...Climate change! Scientists states with the existence of dinosaurs, that there has been life on earth for more than 300.000.000 years. In that time the earth have gone through ice ages and mass flooding. Can we then think that the human in less than 70 years of nuclear plants and mass production factories and automobiles are having such big effect on the world?

I think not

[safedawn]

There still remains evidence to the contrary.

I think this is a ploy for frightened people that have gotten their opinions pummeled by realty.

The earth at this particular point of time is supposed to be on a cooling curve. Not on the heating curve. The polar caps are melting. The places where the ice is supposed to be, is melting. Simple, and true.

Junk science, is always refuted, and much like I.D. has been placed by the courts as dogma not science, it's here we go again.

[poopoorodriguez]

lazy fuckers! manmade warming is absolutely real. evolve for chrissakes

[StrakeJesuitFootball]

Prove it

[agentolshki]

one of the key things that this program highlighted, and i have this recorded, is the different interpretations of the ice core samples. pro man made global warming supporters say temperature follows co2 increase. anti man made global warming supporters say co2 follows temperature. its a key point that needs to be cleared up we need to review the samples. i personally belive its the sun, i mean its veryy volatile, very big and very hot and its right there. i say its the sun.

[tiestopoa]

DING DING DING DING! YOU GOT it RIGTH.,, my dad researches this stuff.. and its not this co2 crap.. its the cosmic rays and magentic poles that are creating these changes,, besides its a cycle becuase its happen just 80 years ago where it got hotter even before planes and cars were adding polutants to the earth...

[Guitarhero2guyEXPERT]

hah, the guy at 8:45 says fuckin

[JohnDeBunkTest]

Last time the carbon in fossil fuels was loose it was the carboniferous age.

Is it any surprise to see a warmer earth when we burn things for decades?

There may be more to the story, but we should act now. CO2 is harmful for a lot of reasons.

Pretending that if we 'do nothing' it will be ok is WRONG.

[StrakeJesuitFootball]

in the last 2000 years, the hottest temperatures recorded were around 1000 AD

We did not have burning fossil fuels then

[JohnDeBunkTest]

We are well above the 1000AD temperatures now, and yes they were burning coal in the middle ages.

There may be more to the story than just CO2, but we need to deal with the part of the problem we do know about. After all, fossil fuel also causes acid rain and respiratory problems as well as global warming.

[StrakeJesuitFootball]

Look at 2:55

[tiestopoa]

actually you know that we dont cause as much c02? and did yuo know that the increase of c02 has also increased the growth of forests?? so NO its not co2.. its water vapor that is 70-95% in the atmosphere..

[JohnDeBunkTest]

This might be an ok argument if we were not cutting down the forests ...

As it is, burning fossil fuels is a problem for several reasons. Warming, Acid rain, smog, pollution, health issues ... the list goes on.

[ComradeLibertarian]

Acid Rain? That was debunked back in the 1990s.

The main argument was that it was causing fish in the great lakes to die. It turned out they were fish that weren't meant to be there, they were put there so sport fishers could fish them.

Nonetheless, I drive in a diesel/electric car, and try not to waste anything. The moral is: You don't have to believe in AGW to be somewhat environment friendly.

[reapfreak]

I screamed when Al Gore won the Nobel prize. I hate when politics gets involved with science.

[PaxArcanum]

P.S. Try explaining away the recent marked decline of bee and amphibian populations and the feminization of fish. Try explaining why cancer deaths, infant mortality rates and severe infant birth defects have risen dramatically in Iraq and other middle-eastern countries which have been subjected to decimation by depleted uranium ammunition. Then you can talk about gl'global warming' til you're blue in the face.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Wow! Global Warming really does effect uranium in Iraq. You have to be one of the stupidist liberals i have ever seen. All you told me that the "CO2" in the Earth that has "gone up" effects bees, overuse of chemcials and nuclear bombs.

[PaxArcanum]

'Warming' is a misnomer. What we are talking about here is not restricted to CO2. It is the systemic destabilization of the planet's ecological balance due to thousands of manmade chemicals including metabolites of pharmaceutical drugs showing up in watersheds, persistent compounds, overuse of chemical fertilizers, thirty years of nuclear weapons testing and thousands of tons of depleted uranium that litter several middle-eastern countries-at the least. Wake the hell up.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Get your facts right. Global Warming is about climate change not chemicals or nuclear bombs. If warming was a misnomer then why even call it Global "Warming". Warming means Somewhat hotter than temperate; having or producing a comfortable and agreeable degree of heat; moderately hot: a warm climate. The definition of the "Global Warming Theory" an increase in the earth's average atmospheric temperature that causes corresponding changes in climate and that may result from the greenhouse effect.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Show me where it says nuclear bombs and chemical killing fish and deforming kids all over the world.

[Matelad]

good explanation. The facts arent as obvious as they think. Chaotic Behaviour dominates weather.And many people can't understand that. Global Warming is real and incredible dangerous. We are all very lucky to have scientist like James Lovelock, Crispin Tickell, sir David King, Richard Betts, Peter Liss, Tim Lenton and so on. England, land of science.

[WaterTheBest100]

soooo georgiatechisnumber1 you dont believe global warming is that what you trying to say??????cuz im pretty sure you are ....right???

[georgiatechisnumber1]

I believe humans affect our climate very very slightly like 1 percent. I think global warming is a big lie that is fueled from more lies. There is little evidence supporting Global warming. Also what i don't like about Global Warming is that it puts fear into everyone, but in 2050 we won't be on fossil fuels as much and find new energy.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

The big point about CO2 is that if it has affect on the climate we should see it in the past to determine climate changes. 1000 years ago we did not use fossil fuels, yet it was hotter then, then it is today

[socratesone]

All this seams to come from the documentary "The Great global warming swindle", which has been shown by many people to be completely lacking any scientific credibility (I made a video about it).

[georgiatechisnumber1]

And Global Warming does? Hah!

[socratesone]

Global warming lacks scientific credibility?

Do a search for "Scientific opinion on climate change" on Wikipedia.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Most of that stuff is all opinions by a couple of guys. The facts there only really show the last 100 years. Proof also shows that it was warmer around 1000 A.D. and Ice Ages during the Cavemen, now what would cause that ...CO2? No!

Probably not

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Also one frontyard lawn provides enough oxygen for a family of four.

[socratesone]

"Most of that stuff is all opinions by a couple of guys."

I think what you meant to say was:

"I did not bother to really look into the information on that page, as I am much more comfortable just assuming that I am right about the non-existence of scientific consensus in global warming."

Also, you should really look up the definition of the word "credibility".

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Ok then why weren't there many hurricanes in 2005, 2006, and so far this year, even though it's projected to get worse and worse

[socratesone]

Well, it could be that we are at a solar minimum.

However, not everyone predicted that there would be an increase in the NUMBER of hurricanes, but in the intensity of hurricanes.

However, this is all speculation, as we don't know what's going to happen. There ARE things that we DO know, however, and those are the things that most global warming deniers are actually denying.

[georgiatechisnumber1]

Ok, but have they been more intense since 2004, no. And even in the 90's, THE HOTTEST TEMPERATURES RECORDED there were few hurricanes.