I never understood the point of a dreaking 4 banger muscle car! Why would anyone buy this or a 2.5 Camaro. I can see a v6 a bit, but a ricer motor?NO!@
Oh and does your Temperature gauge ever go above that? because mine did before I switched it out to the new one when we did all of our sensors over again and it has not gone above the second line since then
@SleeperInc yeah... i doubt it can go to 180km/h though XD. yeaah im thinking of getting a 2.3L but it has 370km's.... i dont know how popualr the motors are in BC... and what about the winter?
@halflife103 It hit 190km/h actually before the engine rev'ed out... course it was going down a hill (have GPS and 2 buddies who can say it did hit 190) but hese engines are bullet proof if takin care of. BC winters are rain, rain and more rain, throw 2 sand bags in the back or a sub box and you'll be fine.
@DashingDomin8r any fox up until 88 had 85 mph gauges 2.3L or 5.0L . 89 was the first year for 140mph speedos and his goes to 150 or 160 its a canadian fox in km/h.
My brother has an 89 N/A auto, thing a total dog to drive. However, it won't die either and has been there to pick me up after my MR2 pukes out its engine.
lol, I thought that the speedometer was in mph at first. Makes a little more sense now, sorry. Not too too bad for an older car with such a small engine though.
terminal velocity has to do with wind resistance. which has nothing to do with weight of the vehicle. so weight has nothing to do with top speed. having 4 people in your car would only make reaching top speed take longer, not change it.
i have the same stang, but its standard. my highest speed ever was 145 km/h and i had 2 passengers, 2 allen blocks (for winter traction) and i was going downhill, lol. dont waste ur time with a new tranny
why would they have the tach read 5500 rpm as redline, not to mention not being able to rev past redline and having the peak power at redline is 100% dumb.
Sorry... Bullshit. The redline is at 5500RPM, the rev limiter comes in at 6250RPM. I shift past 5500 all the time, doesn't hurt it; thats where I feel the most power.
i had a 1982 2.3 mustang with the 2.3 svo engine i got it to go 0-60 in 5.8 sec. lot of work getting it there though. very worth it. sold it after it got to 267,000 miles
see the thing you have to take into consideration is that for 1 whoever out this video on here cant drive for 2 puttin a ranger cam in a car is not going to get you a whole lot of power even though it is roller its stock lift for 3 its an automatic for 4 he cant dive did i already say that bigger cams get you power lighter rod lighter crank mill the head bigger and stickier rear tires spen the money in right places dont blow it on crap that wont get you know where
Yeah, I really miss the little N/A engine. Always fun beating the crap out of it and nothing bad happening... Oh well, a 180HP engine sure makes me smile still :)
this is fuckin slow
Kenttas 11 months ago
can one of these mustangs go beyond 85 mph? non turbo
strengthlove12 1 year ago
@strengthlove12 Yes, I've had it up to 110 MPH
SleeperInc 1 year ago 2
@strengthlove12 -oh yeah...i,ve took down a few 6 cyl.s .....
tuuexx 6 months ago
well i have a 92 2.3 it works well. get some air in it ram air works best for this engine
happycanadas 1 year ago
I never understood the point of a dreaking 4 banger muscle car! Why would anyone buy this or a 2.5 Camaro. I can see a v6 a bit, but a ricer motor?NO!@
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
@Motorfordtoyota buddy, a 2.3 mustang and a 2.5 camaro are NOT muscle cars, they are grocery getters.
Kawasakiforlife7 1 year ago
@Kawasakiforlife7 Oh I know, the 4bangers are SHITTTERS, but the nameplates are muscle car names. So thats why I said that.
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
0-60 in .... hold on, let me get out my calendar
jacksonrhoads541 1 year ago
Oh and does your Temperature gauge ever go above that? because mine did before I switched it out to the new one when we did all of our sensors over again and it has not gone above the second line since then
flashganargerbarben 1 year ago
where did you get the 180mph gauge from?
flashganargerbarben 1 year ago
@flashganargerbarben its KPH there smart one
Kawasakiforlife7 1 year ago
LMAO @ 160mph speedo in 2.3
MrSilent937 1 year ago
@MrSilent937 its in km/h smart one
mitch9521 1 year ago
@MrSilent937 KPH GENIUS
Kawasakiforlife7 1 year ago
wow these things really are slow. unfortunately this is same car i have
amorgan93 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why does my 88 mustang lx 2.3 non turbo only have a 85 mph guage?
amorgan93 1 year ago
@amorgan93 because your a dumbass american an cant realize that CANADA uses the metric system
mitch9521 9 months ago
@mitch9521 because i obviously know that you live in canada??? does being a dick over the internet make you fell better inside? i sure hope so
amorgan93 8 months ago
why does my 88 lx 2.3 only have a 86mph guage?
amorgan93 1 year ago
why am i watching this?
RagSenien 1 year ago 8
@RagSenien Because you have no life :)
SleeperInc 1 year ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@SleeperInc i drive a 2004 Cobra, what do you drive? :-)
RagSenien 1 year ago
@RagSenien it makes the rest of us feel better
ckillls 1 year ago
My mom had one of those, I wish it couldve been the turbo!
JobeMinacum 1 year ago
he has the 5.0 gauges in there guys. he said hes getting the 5.0 swap in a week. the 2.3l mustang gauges only go up to 85mph
DashingDomin8r 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r Wrong... it is the Canadian gauges.
SleeperInc 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r Wrong... it is the Canadian gauges.
SleeperInc 1 year ago
@SleeperInc yeah... i doubt it can go to 180km/h though XD. yeaah im thinking of getting a 2.3L but it has 370km's.... i dont know how popualr the motors are in BC... and what about the winter?
halflife103 1 year ago
@halflife103 It hit 190km/h actually before the engine rev'ed out... course it was going down a hill (have GPS and 2 buddies who can say it did hit 190) but hese engines are bullet proof if takin care of. BC winters are rain, rain and more rain, throw 2 sand bags in the back or a sub box and you'll be fine.
SleeperInc 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r its in km/H
redslayer911 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r any fox up until 88 had 85 mph gauges 2.3L or 5.0L . 89 was the first year for 140mph speedos and his goes to 150 or 160 its a canadian fox in km/h.
brace06 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r no he never changed the speedo gear when he did his cluster swap so really this whole time he was only doing 70
Jakedajeweler 1 year ago
@DashingDomin8r 5.0 gauges only go up to 85 too
Kawasakiforlife7 1 year ago
@Kawasakiforlife7 5.0 Gauges go up to 140, I used to have a 1990 5.0 Notchback.
gearhead2k6 9 months ago
geez guys give him a break!! he was obviously still accelerating! he could have easily made it to 100 in 30 minutes. gosh!!
sniperz1408 2 years ago
mine aint slow its stock and i beat all them preps who think they have a car when its a 94-04 V6
mustangdriveby 2 years ago
if you have the same car with the same motor there is no way possible u would beat a 99-04 v6 without work
35mustang99 1 year ago
haha 19 seconds to 60 mph (100kph)?!
I had one of these and it was slow! but i don't know if it was that slow lol
AvengerXV1 2 years ago
yea i think its that he cant drive
mustangdriveby 2 years ago
what does this car require in order to put a 5.0 litre in please tell me????????????? message me
ShadowReaper1967 2 years ago
it requires a degree in nuclear phsyics and a monkey wrench
GOfmf 2 years ago
jesus i could walk faster than this turd!
mitch9521 2 years ago
Im givin' her all shes got capt'n!!! LOL..ok if you not lying with your speedo then Id say thats not too bad.
blazerboy9010 2 years ago
my 4 banger charger could take this!
superchase08 2 years ago
this is bone stock....
03vicBlack 2 years ago
so is mine, only 80 hp
superchase08 2 years ago
Comment removed
mitch9521 2 years ago
My brother has an 89 N/A auto, thing a total dog to drive. However, it won't die either and has been there to pick me up after my MR2 pukes out its engine.
TheSofaFox 2 years ago 2
dont get me wrong though with the right turbo these things are beast
262Blazer 2 years ago
i wrecked one of these yesterday when i first SAW it i thought it was a 5.0 but when i heard it i knew it wasnt and it got wrecked on
262Blazer 2 years ago
lol, I thought that the speedometer was in mph at first. Makes a little more sense now, sorry. Not too too bad for an older car with such a small engine though.
purgatory13z 3 years ago
convert it to 2.3 turbo with C4 tranny.ull b GOLDEN
TPena92 3 years ago
lucky...your trans goes into all four gears not like mine that doesnt go into 4th......
mustangmando 3 years ago
Your car must be a POS then, I got it up to 170km/h with 4 people in my car and it was still going lol
SleeperInc 3 years ago
terminal velocity has to do with wind resistance. which has nothing to do with weight of the vehicle. so weight has nothing to do with top speed. having 4 people in your car would only make reaching top speed take longer, not change it.
RoganSF 3 years ago 3
I seriously thought nothing could be slower than my 2.3 Ranger..
After this, im wrong. lol Should have gotten the 5 speed man, you're not even comming close to peak HP with that auto.
Beldar4214 3 years ago
I'm having problems just finding manual transmissions where I live XD
SleeperInc 3 years ago
i have the same stang, but its standard. my highest speed ever was 145 km/h and i had 2 passengers, 2 allen blocks (for winter traction) and i was going downhill, lol. dont waste ur time with a new tranny
u2ber1617 3 years ago
how does changing a transmition make the powerout of the motor change?
RoganSF 3 years ago
With the auto its not revving to its peak power. The 2.3L peak power is at about 5500RPM.
Beldar4214 3 years ago
why would they have the tach read 5500 rpm as redline, not to mention not being able to rev past redline and having the peak power at redline is 100% dumb.
RoganSF 3 years ago
Bullshit you'd be banging the rev limiter at that RPM ese.
mxt2s 3 years ago
Sorry... Bullshit. The redline is at 5500RPM, the rev limiter comes in at 6250RPM. I shift past 5500 all the time, doesn't hurt it; thats where I feel the most power.
Beldar4214 2 years ago
seriously just changing it from auto to manual gets u goin faster
262Blazer 2 years ago
Moves pretty quickly. Shit prob. gets good fuel economy.
Transam941 3 years ago
damm that things hauls ass
sc3005spd 3 years ago
i miss my 2.3l mustang... *sigh* word of advice: LET A PRO FOX IT. its just one thing after another, i tell ya. (im canadian too) *high five*
u2ber1617 3 years ago
The transmission bit the dust with the turbo engine in it now lolz XD
SleeperInc 3 years ago
My tercel has the same redline...
noxvet 3 years ago
is that mph or km/h because it looked like on the guage it said kmh thanks
festivafanatic01 3 years ago
KM's, I'm a canadian :D
SleeperInc 3 years ago
damn sleeper, why is everyone flaming you? the new 2.3T is sweet.
finalfantasyXyuna 3 years ago
Everyone is flaming because they got smoked by a 2.3 turbo and they hate seeing a N/A because they know they can beat it, but not a turbo lolz
SleeperInc 3 years ago
i had a 1982 2.3 mustang with the 2.3 svo engine i got it to go 0-60 in 5.8 sec. lot of work getting it there though. very worth it. sold it after it got to 267,000 miles
rndydy 4 years ago
thats pretty sad....
finalfantasyXyuna 3 years ago
see the thing you have to take into consideration is that for 1 whoever out this video on here cant drive for 2 puttin a ranger cam in a car is not going to get you a whole lot of power even though it is roller its stock lift for 3 its an automatic for 4 he cant dive did i already say that bigger cams get you power lighter rod lighter crank mill the head bigger and stickier rear tires spen the money in right places dont blow it on crap that wont get you know where
Rivermanblues 4 years ago
Cam - $15
2.3 turbo swap - $400
0-60? much better :D
btw, what the hell you drive?
SleeperInc 4 years ago
drop a 5.0 roller in it and wake it up
gacntryboy85 4 years ago
Dropped a 2.3 turbo, now it eats stock 5.ohs XD
SleeperInc 4 years ago
no it doesnt, you lie.
rovert21 4 years ago
No, I don't lie, just ask the guy I raced (although he might kill you)
SleeperInc 4 years ago
if he can beat my shitty ass truck, then ill fire up my car.
rovert21 4 years ago
my 1996 dodge ram 4x4 will go 0-100 mph faster than that shitbucket will go 0-100 kph!
rovert21 4 years ago
Congrats, a V8 goes faster than 70RWHP car... You must be soo proud
SleeperInc 4 years ago
yep!
rovert21 4 years ago
your slug is nice.. but im wondering what the heck was ford thinking of making a 4cyl mustang?
demon6696 4 years ago
I'm wondering how the doctor let you live...
But I guess there are things we will never know XD
SleeperInc 4 years ago
he let me live becuase he is a fordfan also :P and he loved my truck lol
demon6696 4 years ago
hey not bad.....8 or so seconds to 60 man.
KoriODU 4 years ago
thats 60km/hr lol...
0-60MPH (100km/hr) in the video was about 18 seconds...gotta love ford
Antnydude47 4 years ago
Nothing to do with ford. Just the fact that a 20+ year old car was there with one of the worst automatic transmissions ever made
SleeperInc 4 years ago
+1 for the shitty auto tranny i just blew my front seal today and now i have to rebuild the whole fucking thing
super6wheelman 3 years ago
Wow..... reminds me of my old '97 Ranger 2.3 auto.... slow and loud.... memories.
Boltfiend 4 years ago
Yeah, I really miss the little N/A engine. Always fun beating the crap out of it and nothing bad happening... Oh well, a 180HP engine sure makes me smile still :)
SleeperInc 4 years ago
Wow......just wow. The 2.3 in my Mazda b2300 would put that thing to shame.
GaiaOnline777 4 years ago
my god sleeper, i new the single plugs were slow but o my god
finalfantasyXyuna 4 years ago
omg that thing is a slug...i think 92 caddy fleetwood can beat that
47glavine 4 years ago
It may be a slug, but its my slug
SleeperInc 4 years ago
lol yes thats true
47glavine 4 years ago
Yes im happy =)
morrowindsidol 4 years ago