I hope x your mental health that you haven't written your comment after you had one for the road and I hope x your country's old times scholar system that you just meant to piss me out.....;-)))
@Trulyloyale *Young punk fool,smacking you around would really do no good.You are just a know it all smart ass.So stay that way.In 20 years when you are no place in life,then you'll see,punk.I don't drink or do drugs.I lift weights,have big muscles,and sail my boat in Hawaii.I have many female friends,in their early 30's.They say "The boys" your age,have a lot to learn.Plato is an old time scholar,so you don't read him either.You are a fool,ask your friends,they will tell you.
It's even arguable a Viking navigator landed on Terranova ( as suggested on below by FridgeOper8tor ) 'cos there are doubts on the strange way the stone with runic inscriptions was found there and some suspect descendants of ancient Vikings brought there from scandinavian lands a few years ago ( you know, nationalistic rubbish is the big ill of XX cent. ) !
Sorry x your frustration , but true history ( and not fake or trash history ) tells us Cristoforo Colombo discovered the New World
and 1st landed on it ( and that's the Lord's truth proved and witnessed ) and Amerigo Vespucci , beyond any jealous attitude , 1st discovered and explorated the rest of continent and South America picturing the New world as one continent which took the name America in his honor !!
True facts and not rubbish or ridiculous chauvinistic bs .
amerigo discovered amazon river and the rio de janeiro bay not north continent he is the one wo considered the new world as a continent colombus was beleiving he crossed ocean until asia
@jam63112 ..Wallseemuller,a mapmaker in 1507 made a "World Map",Vespucci,landed on the continent,Brazil,so he named it after Amerigo,but Americus which is the Latin male form,Female for continents,first declension female is America.The name was kept for central,and north.
Should you laugh or should you cry ?? MsParapapa , no matter where the hell you're from , you 're not supposed to do both things, you should study & learn history
telling us that Cristoforo Colombo discovered the new world on october 12th, 1492
( landed on San Salvador ) and Amerigo Vespucci discovered the whole American continent, South America comprehensive ...!
#1 some bizarre nonsenses & funny jokes dreaming on chinese admirals discovererers & explorers of a continent far more than 6.300 miles who were known to be incapable to sail even to close Japan D !
#2 some ridiculous tales & improbable legends ( none of which has ever been proved by any sure doc or similar ) invented by a bunch of pathetic nationalistic
fellows up there in Scandinavia about a primitive shortbrained viking who discovered a land
he was too drunk to have any memory or recall of ( in fact such pitoresque & eccentric tales talk of that land , which supposedly was actual Newfoundland eastern Canada, as luxuriant one and where grapes & wine were both very abundant ( yeah, Canada has always been heaven as for weather
and a more mediterranean climate land than same Greece or Italy, too bad nobody realized that out of a few millions of pathetic scandinavians
Sorry x some of you uncultured & 1way outminded people , but Cristoforo Colombo
and Amerigo Vespucci first discovered those lands and they did that at the time ancient chinese feared seas and barbarian vikings were good only in predating, ravaging,raping, robbing , murdering & being terrified by religious superstitions
@sm0keshell I talked of times the vikings were living in , that's in my comment and it's so clear & understandable by everyone, even by a 5 years little boy, but you seem to be an exception , jackass !
@sm0keshell ...Vikings "Runes" or symbols were found,up the Colorado River,that were carbon dated to the 500's.So they were there almost 1000 before,Vespucci,or Columbus.
@sm0keshell *Which comment ? Wallseemuller's use of Americus,then America is correct.The Rune Stones found in America,ALL of them,NONE have been proven,It's a some yes,some no,thing.But NO proof.
@billy1212ist totally incorrect , try harder with your or " Youtube Archeo " 'cos NO VIKINGS RUNE or even INSCRIPTION was ever found up Colorado river or Central America , there are only Indian legends on white people coming from out or hieroglyphs where some find images of men who may have a viking look ( but they can seem everyone ...) . Sorry but this is rubbish history or garbage Archeo , chit chat started by frustrated scandinavians who try to overrate their poor past history
and their rude, primitive ancestors dreaming on an imaginary viking expansion to America that NEVER happened by true facts ( they were even incapable to conquer souther france and Mediterranean , you can imagine the New World ....) but only in their tales and fantasy-legends !!
There's no proof at all the Vikings ever landed on Central America , which is simply unthinkable x what were their knowledges , out of the intentional rubbish and the pathetic bs brought out x chauvinistic reasons !
@Trulyloyale*Vikings were World Explorers,"rude" and you know this how?What they were incapable of conquering,has ZERO to do with what they discovered.How foolish.Not (central)USA,but Central America,was not,and is not unthinkable.If the Vikings could sail to Newfoundland,from their home.An extended sail down,and around the coast to Central America was surely within their reach.Also "Knowledge" is singular and plural,the "s" is not used,or needed.
@billy1212ist by TRUE FACTS and not by chats or bs or personal opinions , the Vikings discovered nothing and I you also know it, since you used the conditional verb form ......
I find quite foolish debating upon the so called " Youtube history " or " Internet history " which is nothing else than a ridiculous and senseless amount of rubbish and bizarre bs , I pass on all this 'cos I support true history made of true facts & true docs .....
@Trulyloyale * At 28 years old,have you not been to school at all? So YOU JUDGE "YT" History as"Rubbish"? Fine,use your fingers and type in "Vikings,origin,and history." OK ?My opinions are based on education,years of it,not on YT.ALSO Google: Archeological Viking finds in Newfoundland.There YOU will find TRUE FACTS,now go look.Being that YOU support True Facts.This"I you know it" is NOT the case.YOU don't know it,and I know that YOU don't know it.SO go find out.Seek TRUE FACTS.
@billy1212ist Don't worry x my education , not only I 've been making all grades of school till university , but also I avoid from making stupid comments showing ignorance & poor brain ability now that I'm under 30, I hope I won't when I'll get to 65 like you .....
I don't waste time in judging all the massive amount of bizarre bs & ridiculous nonsenses on the web " YT rubbish " , I just despise it or I make fun of such idiocies !!Ps : I typed what you suggested on google and I found
exactly what I said in my previous comments and what is in reality : NOTHING !!
Nothing out of some refers to some ancient nordic sagas amd many chit-chats . most of all by pathetic & frustrated scandinavian people .
If you need it, I'll give you at least 10 links where you can read the opinions of hundreds true historicians from all over the world who made irony about such rubbish
and criticized the very few who still build up a castle of jokes based on bizarre statements .....
@Trulyloyale You are correct,NONE found in America have been proven.Either a hoax,or quite"iffy".But what HAS BEEN PROVEN,is that they LANDED in Greenland,and Newfoundland,by Artifacts etc.part of North America isn't it ?One can sail around the Southern tip of Newfoundland,inland to the Northern tip of MAINE.Which makes it a possible landfall.And being explorers,quite likely,but no proof.Newfoundland is FACT,not chit-chat,as you say.Also 'cos is spelled cause,or because.A nice guy dosn't say it.
@Trulyloyale You are correct,NONE found in America have been proven.Either a hoax,or quite"iffy".But what HAS BEEN PROVEN,is that they LANDED in Greenland,and Newfoundland,by Artifacts etc.part of North America isn't it ?One can sail around the Southern tip of Newfoundland,inland to the Northern tip of MAINE.Which makes it a possible landfall.And being explorers,quite likely,but no proof.Newfoundland is FACT,not chit-chat,as you say.Also 'cos is spelled cause,or because.A nice guy dosn't say it.
The Chinese Admiral Cheng Ho discovered America in 1421 yet the Viking Leif Eriksson discovered it at the end of the 10th century.......yet "others" most certainly discovered it before.
Christopher Colombus discovered the New World, but he didn't know it was. Amerigo Vespucci knew it was a new world. So that's how we named our country.
XD what are you tslking about? Amerigo vespucci is the biggest lier of the history XD He invented all its journeys XD That is why nobody remembers him and everybody remember columbus.
Christopher Colombus didn't discover anything. Portugal already knew about the New Lands, they dominated the seas in those times. At first, the name of America was only meant to apply to South America.
It is uncertain--though his conquests were not PROVEN, he stated that he did indeed find the new world. This film is a narrative from his perspective, and is therefore embellished accordingly.
@renwuying777 Hes just the first one that said that the new land they just discovered is a whole new continent, and not the eastern side of Asia/India
@billy1212ist ....???????????????????????????
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
I hope x your mental health that you haven't written your comment after you had one for the road and I hope x your country's old times scholar system that you just meant to piss me out.....;-)))
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale *Young punk fool,smacking you around would really do no good.You are just a know it all smart ass.So stay that way.In 20 years when you are no place in life,then you'll see,punk.I don't drink or do drugs.I lift weights,have big muscles,and sail my boat in Hawaii.I have many female friends,in their early 30's.They say "The boys" your age,have a lot to learn.Plato is an old time scholar,so you don't read him either.You are a fool,ask your friends,they will tell you.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
It's even arguable a Viking navigator landed on Terranova ( as suggested on below by FridgeOper8tor ) 'cos there are doubts on the strange way the stone with runic inscriptions was found there and some suspect descendants of ancient Vikings brought there from scandinavian lands a few years ago ( you know, nationalistic rubbish is the big ill of XX cent. ) !
Sorry x your frustration , but true history ( and not fake or trash history ) tells us Cristoforo Colombo discovered the New World
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
and 1st landed on it ( and that's the Lord's truth proved and witnessed ) and Amerigo Vespucci , beyond any jealous attitude , 1st discovered and explorated the rest of continent and South America picturing the New world as one continent which took the name America in his honor !!
True facts and not rubbish or ridiculous chauvinistic bs .
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale *Proof that they Landed in Greenland,and then Newfoundland,by artifacts is of Record.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
Christina Vespucci may have exaggerated to impress the nobleman as she said "Give him a year, and you'll name the entire fleet after him."
Biggest. Understatement. Ever.
epicbladers1 8 months ago
amerigo discovered amazon river and the rio de janeiro bay not north continent he is the one wo considered the new world as a continent colombus was beleiving he crossed ocean until asia
jam63112 1 year ago
@jam63112 ..Wallseemuller,a mapmaker in 1507 made a "World Map",Vespucci,landed on the continent,Brazil,so he named it after Amerigo,but Americus which is the Latin male form,Female for continents,first declension female is America.The name was kept for central,and north.
billy1212ist 9 months ago
lol this is funny
sm0keshell 1 year ago
@@@
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
Should you laugh or should you cry ?? MsParapapa , no matter where the hell you're from , you 're not supposed to do both things, you should study & learn history
telling us that Cristoforo Colombo discovered the new world on october 12th, 1492
( landed on San Salvador ) and Amerigo Vespucci discovered the whole American continent, South America comprehensive ...!
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
You may laugh instead of :
#1 some bizarre nonsenses & funny jokes dreaming on chinese admirals discovererers & explorers of a continent far more than 6.300 miles who were known to be incapable to sail even to close Japan D !
#2 some ridiculous tales & improbable legends ( none of which has ever been proved by any sure doc or similar ) invented by a bunch of pathetic nationalistic
fellows up there in Scandinavia about a primitive shortbrained viking who discovered a land
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
he was too drunk to have any memory or recall of ( in fact such pitoresque & eccentric tales talk of that land , which supposedly was actual Newfoundland eastern Canada, as luxuriant one and where grapes & wine were both very abundant ( yeah, Canada has always been heaven as for weather
and a more mediterranean climate land than same Greece or Italy, too bad nobody realized that out of a few millions of pathetic scandinavians
and dumb people around the world ...D ! ) !
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
Sorry x some of you uncultured & 1way outminded people , but Cristoforo Colombo
and Amerigo Vespucci first discovered those lands and they did that at the time ancient chinese feared seas and barbarian vikings were good only in predating, ravaging,raping, robbing , murdering & being terrified by religious superstitions
( their best and only abilities upon HISTORY ) !!
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
@Trulyloyale at that time the vikings didnt exist anymore smartass
sm0keshell 1 year ago
@sm0keshell I talked of times the vikings were living in , that's in my comment and it's so clear & understandable by everyone, even by a 5 years little boy, but you seem to be an exception , jackass !
Trulyloyale 1 year ago
@sm0keshell ...Vikings "Runes" or symbols were found,up the Colorado River,that were carbon dated to the 500's.So they were there almost 1000 before,Vespucci,or Columbus.
billy1212ist 9 months ago
@billy1212ist yeah i know i just read your comment wrong:P
sm0keshell 9 months ago
@sm0keshell *Which comment ? Wallseemuller's use of Americus,then America is correct.The Rune Stones found in America,ALL of them,NONE have been proven,It's a some yes,some no,thing.But NO proof.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist totally incorrect , try harder with your or " Youtube Archeo " 'cos NO VIKINGS RUNE or even INSCRIPTION was ever found up Colorado river or Central America , there are only Indian legends on white people coming from out or hieroglyphs where some find images of men who may have a viking look ( but they can seem everyone ...) . Sorry but this is rubbish history or garbage Archeo , chit chat started by frustrated scandinavians who try to overrate their poor past history
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
and their rude, primitive ancestors dreaming on an imaginary viking expansion to America that NEVER happened by true facts ( they were even incapable to conquer souther france and Mediterranean , you can imagine the New World ....) but only in their tales and fantasy-legends !!
There's no proof at all the Vikings ever landed on Central America , which is simply unthinkable x what were their knowledges , out of the intentional rubbish and the pathetic bs brought out x chauvinistic reasons !
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale*Vikings were World Explorers,"rude" and you know this how?What they were incapable of conquering,has ZERO to do with what they discovered.How foolish.Not (central)USA,but Central America,was not,and is not unthinkable.If the Vikings could sail to Newfoundland,from their home.An extended sail down,and around the coast to Central America was surely within their reach.Also "Knowledge" is singular and plural,the "s" is not used,or needed.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist by TRUE FACTS and not by chats or bs or personal opinions , the Vikings discovered nothing and I you also know it, since you used the conditional verb form ......
I find quite foolish debating upon the so called " Youtube history " or " Internet history " which is nothing else than a ridiculous and senseless amount of rubbish and bizarre bs , I pass on all this 'cos I support true history made of true facts & true docs .....
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale * At 28 years old,have you not been to school at all? So YOU JUDGE "YT" History as"Rubbish"? Fine,use your fingers and type in "Vikings,origin,and history." OK ?My opinions are based on education,years of it,not on YT.ALSO Google: Archeological Viking finds in Newfoundland.There YOU will find TRUE FACTS,now go look.Being that YOU support True Facts.This"I you know it" is NOT the case.YOU don't know it,and I know that YOU don't know it.SO go find out.Seek TRUE FACTS.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@billy1212ist Don't worry x my education , not only I 've been making all grades of school till university , but also I avoid from making stupid comments showing ignorance & poor brain ability now that I'm under 30, I hope I won't when I'll get to 65 like you .....
I don't waste time in judging all the massive amount of bizarre bs & ridiculous nonsenses on the web " YT rubbish " , I just despise it or I make fun of such idiocies !!Ps : I typed what you suggested on google and I found
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
exactly what I said in my previous comments and what is in reality : NOTHING !!
Nothing out of some refers to some ancient nordic sagas amd many chit-chats . most of all by pathetic & frustrated scandinavian people .
If you need it, I'll give you at least 10 links where you can read the opinions of hundreds true historicians from all over the world who made irony about such rubbish
and criticized the very few who still build up a castle of jokes based on bizarre statements .....
Trulyloyale 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale You are correct,NONE found in America have been proven.Either a hoax,or quite"iffy".But what HAS BEEN PROVEN,is that they LANDED in Greenland,and Newfoundland,by Artifacts etc.part of North America isn't it ?One can sail around the Southern tip of Newfoundland,inland to the Northern tip of MAINE.Which makes it a possible landfall.And being explorers,quite likely,but no proof.Newfoundland is FACT,not chit-chat,as you say.Also 'cos is spelled cause,or because.A nice guy dosn't say it.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale You are correct,NONE found in America have been proven.Either a hoax,or quite"iffy".But what HAS BEEN PROVEN,is that they LANDED in Greenland,and Newfoundland,by Artifacts etc.part of North America isn't it ?One can sail around the Southern tip of Newfoundland,inland to the Northern tip of MAINE.Which makes it a possible landfall.And being explorers,quite likely,but no proof.Newfoundland is FACT,not chit-chat,as you say.Also 'cos is spelled cause,or because.A nice guy dosn't say it.
billy1212ist 1 month ago
@Trulyloyale Theres proof that the vikings where here (north america i mean). In Newfoundland /Labrador (Canada)
FridgeOper8tor 1 month ago
If there was no honor and spirit, discover may not be the word to use. Perhaps stealing??
Yeah you can go to neighbors and discharge them to hang a sign as "Now it's mine" very funny.
SHINYamAHA21 2 years ago
The Chinese Admiral Cheng Ho discovered America in 1421 yet the Viking Leif Eriksson discovered it at the end of the 10th century.......yet "others" most certainly discovered it before.
Time will tell.
Westonelm 2 years ago
reading urs..cookies burnt..
house smell as cookies factory
so many different race had found America.
too bad there are no more left, but some other planet to be discovered?
I think people confuse with discover and invade.
SHINYamAHA21 2 years ago
W:reading ur emails were helpful. thanxoo
enjoy the cookies I made. kkkkkkkkk
Vespucci has done lot of other accomplishments I see. It would've been funny if America was called as Americus Vespucci or Amerige.
I didn't know Europa and Asia got their names from women. Saturday,huh? u r a monster British..lol
SHINYamAHA21 2 years ago
Is this what people in USA learn? That Amerigo Vespucci and Columbus "discovered" USA? Should I laugh or cry?
MsParapapa 2 years ago
Fuck Vespucci....Viva Cristoforo Colombo secula seculorum!!!!!
MrBiblia 2 years ago
Christopher Colombus discovered the New World, but he didn't know it was. Amerigo Vespucci knew it was a new world. So that's how we named our country.
Dgamer21 2 years ago
XD what are you tslking about? Amerigo vespucci is the biggest lier of the history XD He invented all its journeys XD That is why nobody remembers him and everybody remember columbus.
TheSpaniard87 2 years ago
Christopher Colombus didn't discover anything. Portugal already knew about the New Lands, they dominated the seas in those times. At first, the name of America was only meant to apply to South America.
MsParapapa 2 years ago
@Dgamer21 Your country... You're from the US, aye?
Doyle141 1 year ago
Wow u replied to a comment i put 7 months ago, u have no fucking life.
Dgamer21 1 year ago
@Dgamer21 I'm sorry, was I there 7 months ago when you said it? No, so my point is still valid.
Doyle141 1 year ago
how can you discover land that people are already in you white people are thieves n murders. the you got have some nerve to ask y people hate yall
Bransonbud 2 years ago
You jacked a soundtrack from the movie national treasure!
BASTARD!
9119119110000 2 years ago
...yeah. I really didn't. It's from the Da Vinci code :)
Jakester151991 2 years ago
he discover lust hatered and rape of the native people and their treasures
ani1616 3 years ago
Amerigo Vespucci didn't discover anything...
renwuying777 3 years ago
It is uncertain--though his conquests were not PROVEN, he stated that he did indeed find the new world. This film is a narrative from his perspective, and is therefore embellished accordingly.
Jakester151991 3 years ago
@renwuying777 Hes just the first one that said that the new land they just discovered is a whole new continent, and not the eastern side of Asia/India
FridgeOper8tor 1 month ago
That was great and I am a history teacher. Liked the fight scenes and the historical context. Good job.
Ozirah54 3 years ago