Come on, be serious - it says 'recent and historic' - meaning instantly recognizable events from the past and some from the last 2 decades, you can't expect them to feature every significant quake on it... great job in visualizing this!
skycycle 1 month ago
What about Mexico city 1985 of 8.11 and Mexicali city 2010 of 7.1??
selibreaventuras 2 months ago
That's incredible to think about. Thanks for the perspective! :)
JCpatriots 2 months ago
im a little hurt that californias/ baja californias easter 2010 7.2 earthquake wasnt on here
TheAndrew3rd 2 months ago
Should we be considering the relative areas of the circles (pi x r squared), or the relative linear distances between each incident?
ThreeCrackedCheeks 2 months ago
@ThreeCrackedCheeks I believe the area of the circles. A liner representation would most definitely be illustrated differently.
the1nonly12507 2 months ago
Come on, be serious - it says 'recent and historic' - meaning instantly recognizable events from the past and some from the last 2 decades, you can't expect them to feature every significant quake on it... great job in visualizing this!
skycycle 1 month ago
What about Mexico city 1985 of 8.11 and Mexicali city 2010 of 7.1??
selibreaventuras 2 months ago
That's incredible to think about. Thanks for the perspective! :)
JCpatriots 2 months ago
im a little hurt that californias/ baja californias easter 2010 7.2 earthquake wasnt on here
TheAndrew3rd 2 months ago
Should we be considering the relative areas of the circles (pi x r squared), or the relative linear distances between each incident?
ThreeCrackedCheeks 2 months ago
@ThreeCrackedCheeks I believe the area of the circles. A liner representation would most definitely be illustrated differently.
the1nonly12507 2 months ago