@vaguelyhumanoid (1 of 2) No I don't think everything is random - just not all pre-determined. If you could know the complete state of the universe at a specific moment in time you could predict the probabilities of each and every possible state the universe is going to evolve to but only when some 'next' state happens can you know for sure which occurred - still no room for free will.
@vaguelyhumanoid (1 of 2) Dennett makes a good case for Compatibilism via underminng traditional definitions of freewill and using a definition of freewill closer to liberty - and I do get his point - but if we are talking about what most think freewill is then I don't see how it exists - whether reality is deterministic or not -
@vaguelyhumanoid (2 of 2) - I just think on balance that determinism itself is unlikely in the light of quantum mechanics - and freewill, in the traditional sense, is illusionary - still maybe I'm pre-determined to think that way :-)
@vaguelyhumanoid (2 of 2) To put it another way - where reality will 'be' next' is constrained by the current state - but this doesn't give total flexibility which I think the word 'random' implies.
I'd love to enter into some sort of debate about free will and determinism but I'm too distracted by that Kia-Ora shirt. I want that shirt. I want it and I'm not sure why I want it.
So, does free will exist or not? From what I heard, everything is predetermined and cannot be changed, we are in fact, nothing more then robots that are programmed and things are hardwired into us, at least thats what someone told me in a thread, saying that because we can basically break down anything into mathematic equations, there is no free will or choice because its all running on math. If that is true, then I am not sure what that means to be alive then.
I've never understood how people get from saying that actions are products of natural forces just like everything else, to saying that we can't do things like punish people and praise people.
@PerilocutionAZ09 Its because they believe that the actions are therefore not coming from a sense of morality that we can exercise freely, but from neutral, uncaring natural forces. Therefore, people cannot be held accountable for their actions because in reality they didn't choose to do it.
Why? Do you think differently? I'd love to hear your response (and I'm not being sarcastic btw).
@LatumWay Theistic free will is a self-defeating delusion. Relegating conscious action to some transcendent realm does not take away the problem of what determines choices.
But even if there were a distinction between free-will "law" and universal physical laws, why would that mean that people can't be held accountable for their actions? The view that all justice is retributive & carried out JUST because we imagine that things could HAVE gone better, is childish and ignores future consequences.
@PerilocutionAZ09 Sorry, didn't make that very clear. I should have said, "But even if we could properly DEFINE the theoretical distinction between free-will 'law' and universal physical laws, and subsequently falsify the former, why would that mean [...]?"
@LatumWay Who says people can not be held accountable? Everyone and everything is part of the system, including philosophers prone to pondering determinism. Theoretically, no one is responsible for their actions, but practically, they are. The people who're doing the judging are also part of they system, and they can't help but holding others accountable. If we didn't play our part, then we wouldn't be part of the system. So only someone outside the system can be expected to not judge the actors
@LatumWay Here is my view. In a purely detemrinist world where nobdy's accountable for their actions we can continue to punish or praise people anyway because we are not accountable of our action of punishing or praising them. So we continue to do it based on our subjective moral grounds. Moving on.
@LatumWay Could one not classify particular instances of "uncaring natural forces" as "moral" or "not moral"? An instance of events that could be classified as "moral" could include functional brain states (perhaps revealing "intent") and sets of physical circumstances that resulted in a gun being fired. Of course, the law couldn't possibly be rigorous enough to distinguish each instance set, but could describe each class and allow juries to decide if each instance belongs to it.
@BuBBaGump014 They aren't the same. Determinism believes that everything is the result of a previous cause. Fatalism believes that the future is determined, and that this future will occur regardless of the laws of cause and effect.
Only if your logical skills are subpar. If determinism is true then X WILL happen. The possibility of a different outcome does not arise. Thus, Determinism is this: given the current state of the universe U, only one possible next state U+1 is physically possible. Fatalism is: given that some future state of the universe is U+n, any physically possible prior set of states of the universe {U} is such that {U} entails U+n
This was a fun video, man. Amusing but also quite informative.
This is a little off-topic, but I view the soul as the sentient product of the electrical and chemical processes in our brains. That essentially means that every aspect of our psyche is predetermined, but this doesn't make our souls any less real.
The fact that our free will stems from an organic (and therefore predetermined) structure could be evidence for compatibilism. We can consciously override our hormones, for instance.
I used to do whatever other people told me to do, because I thought I was destined to do so. Then I found compatibilism and gained the inner strength to tell them were to stick it. Thanks compatibilism!
@Ilikenuman -- would you say that those who believe in "The Secret"-- with their belief that thoughts become things-- are compatibilists? They either are... or a bastardization of them.
@PaninaroAurora Based on what I know of that book, it's an assortment of a bunch of ill-construed ideas. I'm not sure a bastardization of compatibilism would be representative of that whole book.
Take that, determinism.
BlackMagnumFilms 1 year ago
I thought it said cannibalism
so disappointed....
TheGreatOldOnes 1 year ago
the argument against determinism always amused me. It boils down to "I don't like the idea of it".
I don't like gravity either, yet there it is.
unclexbob 1 year ago
One of your best videos ever made!
mardastheEitheist 1 year ago
I don't beleive in Determinism or Freewill
Artifactorfiction 1 year ago
@Artifactorfiction So, is everything random then?
vaguelyhumanoid 1 year ago
@vaguelyhumanoid (1 of 2) No I don't think everything is random - just not all pre-determined. If you could know the complete state of the universe at a specific moment in time you could predict the probabilities of each and every possible state the universe is going to evolve to but only when some 'next' state happens can you know for sure which occurred - still no room for free will.
Artifactorfiction 1 year ago
@Artifactorfiction Well, being a compatibilist, I believe that free will refers to conscious voluntary choice. I can't see how one can deny that.
vaguelyhumanoid 1 year ago
@vaguelyhumanoid (1 of 2) Dennett makes a good case for Compatibilism via underminng traditional definitions of freewill and using a definition of freewill closer to liberty - and I do get his point - but if we are talking about what most think freewill is then I don't see how it exists - whether reality is deterministic or not -
Artifactorfiction 1 year ago
@vaguelyhumanoid (2 of 2) - I just think on balance that determinism itself is unlikely in the light of quantum mechanics - and freewill, in the traditional sense, is illusionary - still maybe I'm pre-determined to think that way :-)
Artifactorfiction 1 year ago
@vaguelyhumanoid (2 of 2) To put it another way - where reality will 'be' next' is constrained by the current state - but this doesn't give total flexibility which I think the word 'random' implies.
Artifactorfiction 1 year ago
I'd love to enter into some sort of debate about free will and determinism but I'm too distracted by that Kia-Ora shirt. I want that shirt. I want it and I'm not sure why I want it.
BrianTheGoldfish 1 year ago
@BrianTheGoldfish Its rather good, isn't it?
LatumWay 1 year ago
So, does free will exist or not? From what I heard, everything is predetermined and cannot be changed, we are in fact, nothing more then robots that are programmed and things are hardwired into us, at least thats what someone told me in a thread, saying that because we can basically break down anything into mathematic equations, there is no free will or choice because its all running on math. If that is true, then I am not sure what that means to be alive then.
LtHavoc1983 1 year ago
I've never understood how people get from saying that actions are products of natural forces just like everything else, to saying that we can't do things like punish people and praise people.
It's just a complete non sequitur.
PerilocutionAZ09 1 year ago
@PerilocutionAZ09 Its because they believe that the actions are therefore not coming from a sense of morality that we can exercise freely, but from neutral, uncaring natural forces. Therefore, people cannot be held accountable for their actions because in reality they didn't choose to do it.
Why? Do you think differently? I'd love to hear your response (and I'm not being sarcastic btw).
LatumWay 1 year ago
@LatumWay Theistic free will is a self-defeating delusion. Relegating conscious action to some transcendent realm does not take away the problem of what determines choices.
But even if there were a distinction between free-will "law" and universal physical laws, why would that mean that people can't be held accountable for their actions? The view that all justice is retributive & carried out JUST because we imagine that things could HAVE gone better, is childish and ignores future consequences.
PerilocutionAZ09 1 year ago
@PerilocutionAZ09 Sorry, didn't make that very clear. I should have said, "But even if we could properly DEFINE the theoretical distinction between free-will 'law' and universal physical laws, and subsequently falsify the former, why would that mean [...]?"
Anyway, awesome video, by the way.
PerilocutionAZ09 1 year ago
@LatumWay Who says people can not be held accountable? Everyone and everything is part of the system, including philosophers prone to pondering determinism. Theoretically, no one is responsible for their actions, but practically, they are. The people who're doing the judging are also part of they system, and they can't help but holding others accountable. If we didn't play our part, then we wouldn't be part of the system. So only someone outside the system can be expected to not judge the actors
wecaan 1 year ago
@LatumWay Here is my view. In a purely detemrinist world where nobdy's accountable for their actions we can continue to punish or praise people anyway because we are not accountable of our action of punishing or praising them. So we continue to do it based on our subjective moral grounds. Moving on.
Knr911 1 year ago
Comment removed
etherealstill 1 year ago
@LatumWay Could one not classify particular instances of "uncaring natural forces" as "moral" or "not moral"? An instance of events that could be classified as "moral" could include functional brain states (perhaps revealing "intent") and sets of physical circumstances that resulted in a gun being fired. Of course, the law couldn't possibly be rigorous enough to distinguish each instance set, but could describe each class and allow juries to decide if each instance belongs to it.
etherealstill 1 year ago
Wait, haven't I seen this before?
TheOJDrinker 1 year ago
@TheOJDrinker Yes, its from my 'Creept Theist is Creepy' video. Some people said I should upload it as a stand alone video, so I obliged : )
LatumWay 1 year ago
Actually, I was meant to receive an AM radio. It is destiny.
guatepower 1 year ago
Actually, your t-shirt made me thirsty.
KittehAnims 1 year ago
This video made me thirsty
KittehAnims 1 year ago
AM radio? Where do I sign?!
Hazy992 1 year ago
lol, well not really, it only make me smile, but theres no commonly know initialism for that
Lordlaneus 1 year ago
First Zee instead of Z and now commercial instead of advert...
TRAITOR!!!
:P
Frasssaa94 1 year ago
What's the number? I want my radio!
fourtehLOLz 1 year ago
This is exellent thank :D
QuarkyGideon 1 year ago
Solipsist Compatibilism is the future.
baeritukaez 1 year ago
Nice and subtle jab at nephilimfree there.
Anghellik9 1 year ago
Dave is hot.
mchance27 1 year ago
Sounds good to me. How much is P&P?
TheBoyFromNorfolk 1 year ago
ere a cum, benidorm!
JasonLeeWakefield 1 year ago
Sorry to be vulgar, but that was fucking brilliant!
MsMrNoface 1 year ago
we want MORE DAVE! MOAR!
rationalconscience 1 year ago
*snerk* xD
mindofthewolf 1 year ago
YES!
Instant Classic.
Dude, you're really talented.
Knr911 1 year ago
Legendary
NaMgKCa 1 year ago
and now i remember why i subscribed to you!
alexisdutch 1 year ago
Are you saying that your uploading of this video was pre-determined?
noswonky 1 year ago
I'll stick to Epicurianism.
RomeoCo 1 year ago
Your American accent is spectacular. Have I told you that already?
GreatBigBore 1 year ago
@GreatBigBore Probably : )
LatumWay 1 year ago
@GreatBigBore That's because he's American. Don't let the English accent fool you. It's not even a very good English accent.
*hehehehehehehehehhehehehehe*
DeeDemonwitch 1 year ago
You do a great American accent, I'm impressed.
SconeMason 1 year ago
Oh my god, "Alex"s accent sounds exactly like Lauren's from the Catherine Tate Show!
inuyashaxx 1 year ago
Haha, "Dave" sounds like he just came from a Monty Python skit. Was that Graham Chapman??? :D
s8ntmark 1 year ago
A FREE AM RADIO!? OH FUCK MAN! OH SHIT! FREE! AM! RADIO! BBEEEWWAAHH!!!!!
Ogihcati 1 year ago
Determinism =/= fatalism
BuBBaGump014 1 year ago
@BuBBaGump014 They aren't the same. Determinism believes that everything is the result of a previous cause. Fatalism believes that the future is determined, and that this future will occur regardless of the laws of cause and effect.
seany505 1 year ago
@BuBBaGump014
But is fatalism determinism's logical conclusion?
Gettinghitonattheban 1 year ago
@Gettinghitonattheban [But is fatalism determinism's logical conclusion?]
Only if your logical skills are subpar. If determinism is true then X WILL happen. The possibility of a different outcome does not arise. Thus, Determinism is this: given the current state of the universe U, only one possible next state U+1 is physically possible. Fatalism is: given that some future state of the universe is U+n, any physically possible prior set of states of the universe {U} is such that {U} entails U+n
BuBBaGump014 1 year ago
laaawwwwlll!!! XD
SkidRowRadio 1 year ago
HOORAY FOR RECYCLING OLD CLIPS FROM OLDER VIDEOS TO MAKES NEW VIDEOS! lol, please don't hurt me Latumway.
Anghellik9 1 year ago
@Anghellik9 I thought I recognized this. :D
JuryDutySummons 1 year ago
Thumbs up for all the people who looked up Compatibilism on Wikipedia after watching this epic commercial :)
ScienceMusicLove 1 year ago
Comment removed
Gettinghitonattheban 1 year ago
Dave sounds like that one guy from monty python's flying circus...dinnsdale!
Aresftfun 1 year ago
This was a fun video, man. Amusing but also quite informative.
This is a little off-topic, but I view the soul as the sentient product of the electrical and chemical processes in our brains. That essentially means that every aspect of our psyche is predetermined, but this doesn't make our souls any less real.
The fact that our free will stems from an organic (and therefore predetermined) structure could be evidence for compatibilism. We can consciously override our hormones, for instance.
QUANTUMJOKER 1 year ago
I used to do whatever other people told me to do, because I thought I was destined to do so. Then I found compatibilism and gained the inner strength to tell them were to stick it. Thanks compatibilism!
LicoriceLain 1 year ago 3
Is Compatibilism compatible with utilitarianism?
rtottenc 1 year ago
@rtottenc Its compatible with everything. Utilitarianism, yoghurt, jealousy, dust. Everything.
LatumWay 1 year ago 19
@LatumWay Fuck I'm a compatiblist without even knowing I was. T___T Is there a way out??
MistressArte 1 year ago
@LatumWay
Thanks LatunWay, I will send in my order right now.
Oh, yeah, your English access is just so fake sounding. As an American who watched Harry Potter and Monty Python, I am an expert in these things. LOL
rtottenc 1 year ago
@rtottenc
utilitarianism is to do with ethics.... compatibalism is to do with causality and how it relates to free will.
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@Ilikenuman -- would you say that those who believe in "The Secret"-- with their belief that thoughts become things-- are compatibilists? They either are... or a bastardization of them.
PaninaroAurora 1 year ago
@PaninaroAurora Based on what I know of that book, it's an assortment of a bunch of ill-construed ideas. I'm not sure a bastardization of compatibilism would be representative of that whole book.
waltonky 1 year ago
@Ilikenuman
Thanks Numan. I like your videos.
Keep on being cool.
rtottenc 1 year ago
@rtottenc
telling me to keep on being cool implies I was cool to begin with. You clearly know nothing of my work lol
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@Ilikenuman
LOL, Everyone is cool in their own way. :D
rtottenc 1 year ago
lol 4th time you uploaded this? :D
geganobo 1 year ago
aw mate, this was an instant classic! great lols.
gothatfunk 1 year ago
I could swear I've seen this before
NotRelatedToBob 1 year ago
It was determine that I thumbs up this video.
DKshad0w 1 year ago
I'll stick with cannibalism.
llamalord111 1 year ago 27
@llamalord111 LOL'D.
RobertWilfredFoxton 1 year ago