Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,394)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i wonder how much those girls are getting paid to be there

  • OVERCOCK!

  • this is to the extreme by amd.wish i had liquid nitrogen

  • What a load of shit, they reached 6.93 for a split second. So fucking what. A real test is to see how high you can clock all cores and run programs on it while the system remains stable. This so called challenge proves nothing at all.

  • @MrBlewvane *agreed*

  • lol im running intel core i7 2600k at 5,4

  • mh if i am not mistaken the new bulldozer series with 8 cores could overlclock to 8ghz?

  • @UzumakiNarutoKun96 lol fuck no. Thats would set the entire rig on fire.

  • Last night my cpu maxed out at 6.9...If you know what I mean.

  • chuck norris has his laptop running 100GHZ. its is cooled by his coolness

  • low

  • 1:11 FAIL !

  • rofl nerddsss =p

  • 4:59 sweat

  • Comment removed

  • well that was only 1 core overclocked and not all 6 cores.

  • @Necropedocoprphilla sure 6 cores with 7 ghz whats wrong with this?

  • lol amd phenom II ? it has 6 cores

    6x7Ghz nice performance...

  • @MrSpEeDrUn That's not how it works.

  • They got an 8 core bulldozer up to 9Ghz w helium.....and the little 8 core up to 6.5ish with over the counter air cooling. I don't think my Phenom X4 is gonna dooz that.

  • @SirWadsalot This was posted almost 3 years ago

  • Let's see a Mac do this ! lol

  • I need help, this may seem nooby, but fuck it, my pc runs games like a bitch, they're laggy as hell, and i'm confused, my pc specs are, an AMD Athlon II, 4gb RAM, gt430 video card, win 7 64 bit, help, & take it easy I know this might be a dumb question to people who are more knowledgeable.

  • @Jakestaaaar I was going to help you, but you're not smart enough to include the question.

  • @Jakestaaaar how laggy? PM me details + spec and I'll help

  • Too bad AMD Phenom x4s run better than Bulldozers do.

  • in 10 years people will be laughing at the lengths we had to go to to reach only a measly 6.93ghz...

  • @tcv4 OR they will laugh when their 3.0ghz processor can stage the end of the world without breaking 20 Celsius on a stock passive heatsink.

  • @tcv4 we can easily reach 6.93 , we can make alot bigger processors, its primarily about how much extra we can get out of them

  • Too much screaming and shouting.

  • in 5-8 jears this will be standard

  • @Dan81369 Actually, most likely it won't. Most likely they will just keep increasing the number of cores. The heat generated by increasing frequencies is just too high.

  • @rockgod235

    could be true...bulldozer processors have up to 8 cores but under 4Ghz...but we'll see in the future ;)

  • intel = intellect

    amd = aww my dipshit

  • @theleMBeleht AMD is a lot cheaper... Also, it has better multitasking than Intel.

  • AMD sucks cock, hopefully intel will get monopol for CPU one day !

    INTEL 4 EVER !!!!

    (writing on my 5.2 Ghz OC i5 2500k with just Air Cooling, bwahaha)

  • Sausage Fest XD 

  • I LOVE how they added the techno music to make it seem more intense

  • in 10 years, im going to watch this vid and laugh while using a 10 Thz processor... In a pen...

  • @TheWinston1997 No you're not. Want to talk about it in 10 years?

  • @1sword4you Ok. Cya

  • But can it run Minecraft?

  • @sonickid10 With insane mods-spawn 10000 creepers and let them explode around you without lagging.

  • @sonickid10 Need about 1tb RAM for that too :)

  • Competitive Overclocking has to the lamest and dumbest thing anyone has ever done.

    overclock! Overclock! OVERclock! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK!!!!

    SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING NERDS.

  • Playing that stupid beat in the background constantly isn't teeth grindingly annoying.

  • Honestly, I dont care about gigahertz when such nice girls are there...

  • Didnt Intel make an 8 Core Processor with 10 GHZ?

  • I bought this dudes guide. Helped me out way more than this vid =/.

    overclockthis( dot) net (dot) tc

  • do it agen with a i7

  • but will it blend

  • FANATX xD hahaahaahaa

  • There's only one more question to ask: Will it blend?

  • their kids are going to be pissing themselves at this

  • Press 4 repeatedly to do some scratching.

  • i think its frozen

  • If you wern't looking at those girls at 3:00, your gay

  • @helloimclaudio Or a nerd.

  • And then a stock Sandy Bridge quad core outperforms it.

  • Nice... but can it run Pong? *ping* BSOD

  • or can it run sonic the hedgehog lol

  • But can it play minesweeper?

  • this is like sex party for nerd

  • @slambergamer91 This is like a sex party for everyone.

  • OC'ed my i5 2500k to 4.8GHz on air cooler hyper 212 + :)

  • Curti i Sprite na mão do gordim! ASuhUAShs

    

  • just overclocked my amd athlong x 2 250 to 3.720 then i see this - im not so happy now lol

  • would've been funny if someone yelled NVIDIA!!

  • Did u need 2 rent-a-hoes at a geekfest? Geeks dont like hot chicks

  • right after this compusa went out of business... fail

  • its just 1 core so whats the point lol

  • @taix250 if 1 core can do that, that means it can apply on dual core, triple, or even quad core. duh!

  • O_O amd eso 7.00 ghz mi :3

  • it would of been sexier if the girls where wearing red instead and tight short skirts! ;)

  • overfuck xD

  • AMD fratparty

  • anyone know what they use to avoid it from sweating?

  • AMD is the best ever!!!

  • @emmanuel5710 no it isn´t! Most games u will lose perfomance then realy win! I had a AMD phenom X6 and it sucks like a shit! My new i5 gives me +20-30 fps on games then the AMD...AMD is great for editing! Nothing else

  • @BGamerPCReviews did you know AMD before sucks?, now is getting much better, im agree- never compare AMD vs i5... AMD is mostly for editing, and design programs like photoshot CS4 CS4. sonysvegas...ect!

  • @emmanuel5710 exactly! Same opinio!....for games sucks...but yes can be truth but I liek mroe gaming...even for editing games I like more Intel! Have more rending on Crysis...depends ofc of the game xD

  • @BGamerPCReviews I'm sorry but you would never and I mean never get a 20-30 fps increase on any game going from an x6 to an i5. Even a 965 BE quad core AMD processor will not bottleneck say a 6970 or 580. You would see maybe a 5-15 fps increase from an 1100t to a 2500k whilst in real world gaming scenarios. And no AMD is not the best for editing, I personally prefer AMD processors however for the hyperthreading in the sandybridge CPU's make them far better for editing and encoding.

  • @AllvarGaming nope I say its true! the amd x6 was same perfomance as a Quad core 9300! so tell me...why I had 30 fps on gta vi with amd and after i5 60-70? Han? ...every case is a diferente one! AMD sucks....even the new models are slower then a i5...See benchmarking games!

  • @AllvarGaming btw intel beats the 1100t on most games...so don´t tell me AMD Phenom X6 is better then i5 or i7 series...If we are talking about oc then we are same way..Intel beats! Yes...I test and make benchs and results are realy intressant because most of them Intel wins with alote diferences! GTA IV in AMD with ur CPU u mention i had 38FPS maxedout, with Intel Stock Speed ofc I had 55Fps...! Other thing, Crysis 2 I had 34-40FPS now with Intel I got 42-63FPS...explain that?U can´t! Itsa fact

  • @BGamerPCReviews I never said the 1100t was better, infact I said you would see a 5-15fps increase going from an 1100t to an i5. The results you have obtained seem completely unrealistic going from a like to like system, it would seem that something is wrong in the platform you are using. What motherboards did you use for these benchmarks?

  • @AllvarGaming for the Intel I used MSi P67A-C45 and for AMD I used MSi 890FXA-GD65...4x4GB DDR3 at 2000MHz Speed...HD6870 and GTX580....and yes seems to be unrealistic but is the truth! thats why I gave my AMD away!

  • @BGamerPCReviews Did you benchmark on both of those cards for each CPU?

  • @AllvarGaming yes ...4 times with 2 each CPU....diferente GPU....or better...AMD +NVIDIA AMD+ATI INTEL+ATI INTEL+NVIDIA

  • all amd processor sucks

  • Great success, High five ^^ 

  • guys came to that place for the chick

  • "How to waste money"

  • yea, they were so excited about that and when they reach 6.93 GHz its like :''...OOOH 6.9 yeah...'' wow!

  • @KoexX93 69 runend by a period

  • OverCock OverCock OverCock 8----D :)

  • Hardcore overcocking :D

  • Who gives a shit. what good is it if you have to have all that shit to run it?

  • lol what u bunch of fags .usin amd .HA! ,ITNEL IS way better

  • I want to over-clock my 2.3 ghz AMD laptop processor to something higher. What happens if I try that? Will it go KABOOM?

  • @damitchman9 as long as its cooled really good you can probs get about 3.2GHz on it

  • until they finally reached my overclock

  • Over-nerd !! Over-nerd!!! Over-nerd!!!

  • Its fast yes, but its sad it wont run crysis since it isnt stable for more than a few seconds...

  • my friends helium is for pussies...

  • omfg... i only have a bit over 3 and i just bought it last month so now im already behind i hate you guys

  • 2:12 ...Geek Unit!

  • this is fckin weird

  • smoking.... cold.

  • But can it run Tetris?

  • fucking nerds drunk on sprite n coke jking at least have some beer or vodka eyy?

  • Can it run Crysis?

    Can it run Crysis?

    Can it run Crysis?

    WTF???

    Doesn't anyone else have any better thing to say?

    And the answer is no, it is too unstable to play crysis.

    Moreover, crysis does not need a very powerful CPU. GPU, yes...

  • EpicOverclockTime

  • just put the cpu under the armpit of a polarbear

  • What's with the gay porn techno beat in the background?

  • Now play Minesweeper.

  • Frikis...frikis everywhere!

  • I bet it still cant play crysis

  • lol fcking nerds, all the women are like wtf are all this men so happy about

  • @pl725616 i remember making the same kind of comments when i was 12 too.

  • I just want to punch the commentator, he should shut his mouth because he's amazingly annoying

  • I heard anything over 4.0 Ghz has little to no difference improvement in performance.

  • @sloppiexx Not true. At all. Extreme CPU speeds are the most noticeable differences in performance you can have. I clocked my 980X to 5.33 gHz, two full gigs beyond the base clock and it's way faster than 4.0ghz. For gaming, decoding, and overall benchmark performance, the higher the clock the better. With the current software limitations the cut-off is probably around 25gHz. You won't see much improvement like from say 3.0 ghz to 5.0 ghz.

  • @Motoskichimo1974 It's far more useful than say upping RAM from 6GB to 24GB, regardless of clock and bus speeds. Of course on the gaming side GPUs are the most important pieces of hardware and overclocking your videocard can and will give you the best results. But just because you have two $1000 "Eyefinity 12" 4GB HD5990s doesn't mean you'll get a framerate of over 100 in Crysis 2 with 32x Antialiasing if you've got a fucking 2 gHz Pentium 4 proc. Everything is relevant. And every gig matters.

  • geek racing

  • as soon as he said crossfireX, i closed google chrome.

  • Is the mic work...?

  • OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK! OVERCLOCK!

  • with intel procesors you dont need to overclock xD

  • COMPUSA SUCKS

  • okay how the hell am i supposed to do this at home?

  • Well thank freaking god that i can still run a single core at 6.93GHZ at near absolute zero...

  • @AirsoftDomonation you kno absolute zero is not possible in the unverise becuase all around us there is energy so this is comming from a 9th grader so i hope this helped for a sicence tip

  • @CptCrunchization A in science, F in English

  • How many cores? If it's only one, that's not too impressive...and also we want to see bench performance scores, not just speed numbers...

  • the fans arent even helping at this point

  • Audio recording fail.

    

  • lol one core lol.

  • Well, now I know is better buy a good processor than a lot of liquid nitrogen

  • What software are they using to overclock? I would really prefer on-the-fly overclocking instead of setting the multiplier in my BIOS and restarting everytime :P

  • it still cant run crysis

  • hey. so i know nothing at all about computers. can somebody explain to me what is going on?

  • @illtakeit1 They're overclocking, making a computer processor work faster than it's made for.

  • What is that goofy ass looking jar thing they have on the CPU? I may want to see if I can build a testbed based around one of those for kicks and giggles.

  • LAME

  • aaaaaaaaaaaaand the mic wasnt on.

  • TIgerdirect hires ex-prison convicts in theirs stores. Do not trust them!!!

  • overclock! overclock! overrated! overrated! overrated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • how much did they pay to have hot girls present? probably more than creating the video itself.

  • lol i bought my laptop 3 years ago for $1500 ! 2Ghz, 4 gigs ram, 512 mb nvidia

    And now its outdated,,,,

  • @noelgomesmaster laptops suck

    my pc:

    HD6870 1gb gddr5

    amd phenomII x4 965 4,0GHz 4 core

    4gb ddr3 2000MHz ram

    770 extreme3 mobo

    all that for 600$ :)

  • @marfg12345 4Ghz??? is that overclocked? and dayum thats a good set for 600$ !!

  • @noelgomesmaster yep, it's 3,4gHz stock, but oc is easy, it's a nice cpu, 3,4GHz is already a beast

    custom build pc's are beasts, and you save up A LOT OF MONEY

    now you can buy this pc for 500$

  • 6.93GHZ to play minesweeper WEEEEW

  • No, I am not an Intel fanboy. I want to get the fastest available product out with reasonable pricing. Therefore I purchased a Core i7 2600k. Although I paid $315 for mine, I could have easily opted for the i5 2500k for $100 less. The i5 2500k is essentially on par with the i7 2600k in gaming and single-thread performance. For $215 you can get yourself a powerhouse that wipes the floor (litterally, it is that much better) with anything AMD has to offer. If you want the truth view some benchmarks

  • DoctorBastardo has to be a drop out because anyone with common sense and a half a brain could understand that multi-billion dollar corporation who provides well over 70% of market share couldn't possibly sell "glitchy" hardware. Just to reinforce that you a dumbfuck, AMD's IPC jump for Phenom II rivals Core 2 numbers. Instead of making baseless conclusions, browse over some benchmarks and find that the i3 2100 is right there with and in some instances faster than the Phenom II x6, AMD's top dog

  • @Mudkips4lif3 probablyy you right about speed but phenom ll x6 has 6 cores , and computer animator use every core to build viirtual machines so this is the result to have 6 machines runing  in a private cloud , you can bring 6 rendering at the same time and if you overclock the processor that will brake any intel speed . now remenber that i3 and i5 has only 2 cores and i7 has only 4 cores the diference is just cores and speed , lol.

  • @vectoranime123 The amount of cores or core freqency doesn't matter. Intel uses a more efficient design on their processors which makes Intel processors faster clock for clock than AMD offerings. Intel uses a 32nm process for their new line of 2nd gen i7 processors. This allows them to add more transistors. AMD is still stuck on 45nm. But yet still even the first gen Intel i3-i7 processors are 45nm and still are faster clock for clock than AMD Phenom II becuase of more $ for R&D and Intel's Team

  • @Mudkips4lif3 of course it doesn't matter the amount of cores for regular people like you .but for people that works in 3d animation it matters a lot and really a lot example ; in order to bring four picture multiples shades and lights high resolution with i7 i can take over 4 hours , now to bring 6 pictures with the same set up for rendering without overcloking i can take 4. 1/2 hours . NOW CAN YOU SEE THE DIFERENCE . for you is not important amount of cores but for enginering ,movie ....

  • @Mudkips4lif3

    6 cores 3.4 GHZ Default for $260. 4 Cores 2.8 Ghz $300+. Efficiency doesn't make up the giant loss for speed.

  • @vectoranime123 for enginering , medicine , movie developers is very important . overclocking is not just for stupid games look i have a water system in my pc but also a refrigerating system connect it .and by overclocking i'm bringing the set up of 4 pictures in 3d in less than 45 minutes . see my friend you have a lot to learn

  • So many fucking idiots posting.

    As far as reliablity goes, it is really hard to kill processor from either company. Very rarely is a cpu dead on arrival for no reason. Unless during your overclock you run stupid amount of voltage through your parts then you are asking for trouble regardless if your processor is made by AMD or Intel.

  • HaHa... always funny to read the intel brain doners dissing an amd chip.... funny thing is amd owners are so busy ENJOYING their their smoother, less glitchy, cool running PCs they dont bother dissing intel shit... The ONLY probs I've EVER had in 9 years of modding and system building is with intel or their shit gargling whore sister nvidia. Presently running 2 Kumas a Phenom a K7 & a K6 all for music production. Apart from my sons rig with the phenom as I'm building him his 1st gaming tower!

  • Owe her cock!

  • even my core 2 duo e6550 is faster then this crap. and its only 2.3 ghz

  • @M4dHacks amd cpus since 2002 have been able to perform more instructions per GHz

    a long while ago i had an athlon XP 2800, it is 2.1ghz, its is approx same speed as a 2.8GHz P4

    the lower clock speed means lower heat, lower heat means you can over clock more.

    a XP2800 will quite hapily run at 2.35Ghz (as fast as a XP3200) with STOCK COOLER below 45 deg c

    65 Deg C is the physical limit of materials the cpu made from, after several days or several months cpu will degrade and burn out sooner

  • @neogastropoda1 No it doesnt you idiot... GHZ != heat

    You fucking kids spread like... vampires, or the gays.

  • @Driv3th3hiv3 thats what i said 'lower clock speed means lower heat'

    if u underclock a 3.2ghz chip to 1.8 itl b runnin cooler & more energy efficient than a chip built to run at 2ghz

    the 1.8 will also quicker due to better chip archtecture AMD get more power from 1ghz than intel can in a similar way to above, Eg. overclock AMD chip 30% u get 28% more performance, overclock an intel 30% u get 20% more

    more ghz doesnt mean liniar increase in power

    try it with 2 pentium 4's using same cooler

  • @neogastropoda1 Lol, you seriously fail hard. Go home AMD fanboy :D

  • Intel fanboys...

  • @computerfreakDK intel is way better then AMD

  • whats the friggin point to raising a core to 7, ya cant run shit with it like that lol, why not just make a chip set to run at those frequencies? if ya can do it once y acan make a real 7 gig chip, hell put 4 single cores on one board! use a hyperbus and include an awesome video chip for each core then have 8 gigs dedicated ram for those and 12 for the system...uh air cooled too