Added: 4 years ago
From: saucerhunter
Views: 13,203
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why did the IDIOT!! camera guy turn away from the slides at 4:55, the most crucial time Mr. Lear was showing the compelling shots.

  • This John Lear guy is really interesting. Thanks man and keep it up.

  • @SanchezFrank21 - you do realise what he is sprouting is BS. The formulae etc he quotes are all incorrect. I'd say his schooling was lacking as this stuff he quotes is so full of holes.

  • omg fucking camera man needs to learn how to get all of the slides!!

  • If this is true, what is the purpose of keeping activity on the moon a secret? To surpress technology? Again why would this be necessary?

  • @mojav26 , for many reasons. if its ancient buildings on the moon who built them? everyone would say "aliens" because ancient man never went to the moon...even if they did go somehow. thats a very small example. but basically everything would change, all the history books would have to be rewritten in schools, colleges/universities, museums, evolution, basically everything that we were EVER taught would have to change. thats why its not gonna be revealed..maybe some day.

  • @mojav26 - because none of what Lear says is true.

  • Yes. Everybody go outside right now and look at the spot. and ask yourself ! why are the lights on? Go and check out the Moon ,Are as we call her Luna. And give it more then a % min. throught.

  • Alright, the interesting thing about this guy regardless of the veracity of what he says is the combination of what he says with his background.

  • If all you think about is a hammer, you will see nails everywhere..people will see what they want to see.

  • The density of the moon has very little to do wiht the gravity. Confirms he knows nothing about maths.

    The calculation of gravity requires the masses to be know and the distance separating the masses.

    The formula he quotes is wrong (obviously the fact he admits to failing maths says it all).

    Ignorance is bliss.

  • @zzytrewq

    yes and people that say "maths" must know all lol

    moron lol

  • Comment removed

  • @buffboynick Watch that fucking mouth of yours racist retard. Remember, you think that electrons clump together, how ignorant do you have to be to think that?

  • @zzytrewq

    take your "oxford dictionary" and shove it up your quivering poop hole lol

    "maths" haha!!!!!

    Get Spellcheck, its a cheap program and you clearly need it.

  • @buffboynick -the American dictionary (Merriam Webster) has this definition (copy/paste):

    maths: [noun] pl \ˈmaths\ chiefly British

    So your country's dictionary recognises the plural of "math" is "maths" and acknowledges that it is a chiefly British term, seeing as that's my origin, well it seems your hillbilly breeding has let you down again.

  • @buffboynick You made the same mistake again retard. Remember you write 'feces', learn to fucking spell, racist cunt.

  • i like salad

  • you cant see earths atmosphere from earth, only the clouds which suggest there is one

  • he reckons theres towers on the moon which captures souls and returns them 2 earth.everyone look at the moon does it look yellow?do the stars twinkle as they pass behind it? no hence proof of NO MAJOR ATMOSPHERE.also a atmosphere implys natural rainfall but yet again there is no natural water on the moon.the moon is heavily cratered did its "atmosphere"go on vacation when this was occuring?

  • learn science... better. every star twinkles. An atmosphere on the moon wouldn't make any observational effects for an earth-based astronomer. atmosphere does not imply rain, obviously, case in point is Mars. thin atmosphere allows for clouds, but doesn't mean rain. and atmospheres are not a force field! the earth has been struck billions of times by meteorites! but we have tectonic activity, which recycles the crustal layer.

  • john lear is full of shit.he piggybacks off of the work done by richard c hoagland,spins it to his favour and and makes up a load of shit to back it up.major faults with what he says:if the moons atmosphere was as he says it is apollo would have burned up in it the module wasnt built to withstand that,he says his friend took the pics of the moon 15"telescope gets u a nice enuff pic of virtualy the surface.has he not noticed the sky is still black?or is he acusing his friend of airbrushing 2?

  • I agree, his story is so absurd and he cannot back his claims up with evidence. bullshit

  • no one gives a shit

    we still gonna be sat here in 10 years

  • yup! anything from John is well appreciated!

  • great post, thanks

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more