@innoval01 -I really hope so! I managed to watch about 14 minutes of this video before shutting it down.It was just laughable how ignorant all members who commented in this video are to the actual facts to do with the Shroud.They should take Mr.Porter's advice and thoroughly research something before they go posting it on Youtube...It just makes them look STUPID and definitely not worth trusting in the future.Here's some help in your research; Shroud.com, ShroudTV, ShourStory.
@ChrisFromDallas Calm down, the internet isn't that serious. I don't think it was intentionally marked as spam by any one of us (Jason, Bob or myself) seeing as we are actually excited to read what Dan has to say and will address all of his arguments in a later episode. We may even invite him on the show should he want to come talk with us.
@kenxvx Everything's cool, but maybe you and your colleagues need to mature a bit more if you really mean to have fair and informed discussions about things such as the Shroud of Turin, even if it is on youtube. Not only did you completely misrepresent the facts, you called into question the integrity of renowned scientists with no basis whatsoever. Garlaschelli has NOT replicated the Shroud, as with the chemistry, 3D effects and superficial image he came nowhere near - see shroud(dot)com
Chris, thanks for your support. It will be interesting to see what they can put together. I really hope they explore the facts carefully, this time.
innoval01 9 months ago
@innoval01 -I really hope so! I managed to watch about 14 minutes of this video before shutting it down.It was just laughable how ignorant all members who commented in this video are to the actual facts to do with the Shroud.They should take Mr.Porter's advice and thoroughly research something before they go posting it on Youtube...It just makes them look STUPID and definitely not worth trusting in the future.Here's some help in your research; Shroud.com, ShroudTV, ShourStory.
Flagrum3 7 months ago
Why have you marked Dan Porter's (innoval01) comment as spam? And you accuse others of intellectual dishonesty - what a joke!
ChrisFromDallas 9 months ago
@ChrisFromDallas Calm down, the internet isn't that serious. I don't think it was intentionally marked as spam by any one of us (Jason, Bob or myself) seeing as we are actually excited to read what Dan has to say and will address all of his arguments in a later episode. We may even invite him on the show should he want to come talk with us.
kenxvx 9 months ago
@kenxvx Everything's cool, but maybe you and your colleagues need to mature a bit more if you really mean to have fair and informed discussions about things such as the Shroud of Turin, even if it is on youtube. Not only did you completely misrepresent the facts, you called into question the integrity of renowned scientists with no basis whatsoever. Garlaschelli has NOT replicated the Shroud, as with the chemistry, 3D effects and superficial image he came nowhere near - see shroud(dot)com
ChrisFromDallas 9 months ago
I have posted a full reply at The Shroud of Turin Blog on shroudofturin wordpress com.
innoval01 9 months ago