Theoreticly you could work with an almost infinite number of dimentions with shapes, trillions of dimentions, a Googol dimentions, imagine the shapes or even ratios that could be gained with a shape with a Googolseptaplex, nonated to a Googolseptaplex nonated to a Googolseptaplex nonated to a Googolseptaplex for a Googolseptaplex more levels dimentions. This is really something to think about.
Shapes are a curious thing the number of hyper shapes in higher dimentions must be close to infinite. There are levels of operation in mathenmatics that go up to unimaginably large numbers. They start with addition, them multiplication, through exponentiation, tetration, pentation, hexation, heptation, octation and past nonation, those levels would work well when dealing with higher dimentional shapes.
It would also be useful the calculate the ratio between 9 shapes to get a better understanding of the geometry of space. These would be: The triangle, the square, the pentagon, the tetrahedron, the cube, the dodecahedron, the 4 dimentional tetrahedron, the 4 dimentional cube or tesseract and the 4 dimentional dodecahedron. But these are just 9 shapes along two axis, what about 27 shapes along 3 axis or more, what would be understood through those types of axis.
You are missing the sixth...
pikuorguk 6 months ago
Theoreticly you could work with an almost infinite number of dimentions with shapes, trillions of dimentions, a Googol dimentions, imagine the shapes or even ratios that could be gained with a shape with a Googolseptaplex, nonated to a Googolseptaplex nonated to a Googolseptaplex nonated to a Googolseptaplex for a Googolseptaplex more levels dimentions. This is really something to think about.
RJL738 10 months ago
Shapes are a curious thing the number of hyper shapes in higher dimentions must be close to infinite. There are levels of operation in mathenmatics that go up to unimaginably large numbers. They start with addition, them multiplication, through exponentiation, tetration, pentation, hexation, heptation, octation and past nonation, those levels would work well when dealing with higher dimentional shapes.
RJL738 10 months ago
It would also be useful the calculate the ratio between 9 shapes to get a better understanding of the geometry of space. These would be: The triangle, the square, the pentagon, the tetrahedron, the cube, the dodecahedron, the 4 dimentional tetrahedron, the 4 dimentional cube or tesseract and the 4 dimentional dodecahedron. But these are just 9 shapes along two axis, what about 27 shapes along 3 axis or more, what would be understood through those types of axis.
RJL738 10 months ago