Added: 4 years ago
From: peeklip
Views: 358,726
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,943)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • put vinegar and water in a vaporizer / humidifier outside your window to break up the chemtrails.  its acid base reaction. it works!!!

  • As seen here, the payed shills continue to puke out more disinformation none stop, telling the sheeple a dog is a cat, a cup is a shoe'.

  • I caught that myself. This reporter is trying to sell us snake oil.

  • @bcsowncool Glad to see people still use reason to question what is reported as 'fact.' It's reassuring to see that not everyone is hooked on fear. Thank you good sir.

  • This reporter is retarded.

    68.8ug/L = 68.8 Micrograms per Liter.

    1 Liter water = 1000grams.

    1 microgram = 1 MILLIONTH of a gram.

    Thus, 68.8 micrograms/Liter = 68.8 parts per BILLION (68.8 parts per million x 1L / 1000g/L)

    Safe levels are at 2 parts per million, or 2 milligrams per liter.

    Thus, Barium levels in the water were about 30 times LESS than the toxic level.

    The reporter also cannot count decimal places (6.8 instead of 68.8)

  • It's 100% deliberate, soils globally are now contaminated with high levels of barium and aluminum, while Gates/Monsanto/Rockefeller have developed an aluminum resistant crop gene (charitable donations) at Cornell, owned by USDA, translation, nothing will grow unless it is "owned" by the USDA and makes everybody sick in the bargain, hence windfall profits to major big pharma stockholders (Gates/Monsanto/Rockefeller). Alum toxic soils have never been a problem. BA Botany, MS Soil Science

  • @cusanusnicolas Really soil samples with barium and aluminum. Wow huge find. Aluminum is naturally found in clay and clay is found all over the world. Barium also exist in nature, found in the mineral barite which is found in ore deposits underground. Barium is generally present in air as a result of industrial, emissions, particularly from combustion of coal and diesel oil and waste incineration. Please educate yourself before you buy into this crap.

  • Concerned about the consequences to your health?How about the health of your family? Protect yourself and your loved ones from the fallout of the Chem Trails with the ENVIRO 3 Bio App Patch.. frequencyapps com/node/302

  • A#$...hOLES.....

    

  • Some days, the sky is covered with chemtrails. Some times, the very next day; with weather conditions exactly the same, there is absolutely nothing, except for a few "contrails", that dissipate fairly quickly. Does that mean there were only a few flights that day?! Chemtrails spraying is way out of control. WAKE UP! Chemtrails, HAARP, toxic GMOs, toxic fluoride, toxic artificial sweeteners...the masses are living in the Matrix.

  • Haha... Do math much dude?!

  • Thank you peeklip: This is excellent info.  Today they are covering the whole of Los Angeles County and airport officials are calling them contrails of course.

  • @SMDAHL

    68.8 ug/L means 0.0688 ppm

    The EPA safe level is 2000ug/L The who safe level is 7000ug/L

    This test revealed barium at 30 times LOWER than the normal safe level.

    The whole nonsense is the result of a dumb reporter who can't convert METRIC.

  • erniepond1,jeff7477 are gov. paid sock puppets !

  • The Federal Reserve is the problem. They are the ones who are largely financing the chemtrail spraying dumps. End the FED.

    The FED has the money. The recent GAO audit of the FED revealed that it had made 16 trillion dollars worth of secret loans to American and foreign banks from 2007 to the present.

    The Rothschild family through the FED are responsible for spraying the earth with these chemtrails. End the unconstitutional FED now. They are our enemy.

  • erniepond1 is a shill .

  • @SprayNozzles

    Spaynozzle is a DILL !

  • "Chemtrails: Barium In Our Blood Blamed On Food And Water - WE WANT ANSWERS!"

    v=KxTGR7LH4VA

  • @Skywitness

    Do you know which Barium is added in chemtrails?

  • The paid shills always try to overrun this page with disinformation, as seen.

  • BARIUM COMPOUNDS are very common e and widely used. Barium sulphate is used as a contrast agent in X raying the digestive tract. Also used in brake linings replacing asbestos. It is also used in drilling mud in oil platforms.

    As a pollutant, barium is found in FLY ASH emitted from coal fired power station, very common in USA.

  • erniepond1 is definitely a failed disinfo shill who knows that nano sized Aluminum oxide is being sprayed deliberately into our atmosphere.

    He also knows about the tests which have shown that a high and dangerous amount of Aluminum has been found in rain, soil, and snow samples. These high amounts of Aluminum are a direct result of the ongoing chemtrail spraying operations.

  • @Skywitness

    HEY Flyash.

    Flyash thinks the world is FLAT and there ARE NO TIME ZONES!

    It is near 5PM here in Sydney. Is it % PM in Florida, king country for CONTRAILS !

  • @Skywitness What tests, where is the documentation? WHY CAN'T YOU PROVIDE ANY OF THIS. You are just a dumb fucking broken record.

  • Don't any of you people fact check?

    The reading 68.8ug/L means 0.0688ppm

    The EPA safe level of barium is 2000ug/L

    The normal NATURAL level of barium in windblown dust is between 200 and 3000ppm

    This report was retracted by Jeff Ferrel years ago and he admitted he made a HUGE MISTAKE in calculation of metric units.

    Why aren't any of you checking the figures and working out for yourself the report is nonsense?

  • Pay no mind to GregOrca. He knows that chemtrail spraying is real and he has never been able to debunk the numerous videos of evidence which clearly show chemtrails being sprayed.

  • @GregOrca if you're actually believing all those figures as FACTS then you're gonna be in for a shocker. We always find out too little too late.

  • @SirSmok3Alot225

    The great irony of your comment is that chemtrail believers accept the statements in this video as fact without checking anything!

    The figures actually tested reveal LOW natural levels of Barium. The whole internet meme of barium in the sky stems from this one video that has INCORRECT metric conversion.

    The whole myth of high levels is based on bad maths!

    And the hundreds of thousands of chemtrail believers who repeat the mistake are equally foolish!

  • Barium is among the least harmful of substances of those on that list of chemicals and metals found during the analysis..... Cadmium is one of the most toxic metals known, then u got Arsenic and Lead in the mix..... This is criminal.

  • @tsaklar

    I'd say the ringing in your ears comes from inside, not outside!

  • great..KSLA is my local news channel

  • Just read an interesting article about how application of barium reduces barley yields by 38%. That makes me wonder what it does to the other crops that the US relies on to feed the world. Could somebody be trying to induce famine on the world?

  • @anderson4707

    Yeah, they are.

    Have you heard of the New World Order? That pretty much will answer your all of your questions.

  • @anderson4707

    •Samples of water were collected in August 2007, in Stamps Arkansas, by leaving some bowls outside for a month

    •The resultant dirty water was tested by KSLA and was found to have the same amount of barium in it as most municipal tap water.

    •The reporter misunderstood the results, and said there was a lot of Barium

    •The reporter now admits he was mistaken, and that he found no evidence for chemtrails

  • Gone in 45 seconds:

    "Low Altitude Chemtrail destroys Cumulus Cloud"

    v=QSC1bYq4q-4

  • "The CHEMTRAILS PATENT: laminar Microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids"

    v=S-4EXNRf3gE

  • It's parts per billion, not million; thus, it is lower than the EPA's standards.

    *Bonk*

    Should have went to high school chemistry and learned how to convert units.

    Have a V8 while you're at it.

  • These News Anchor people are completely Brain dead... To call what WE see in the skys above everyday "Alleged" is a blatant slap in the face. When We see aircraft crossing the skys flying in NON-commercial flight paths one after the other and even one in front of the other or along side of eachother "alleged" all anyone can do is get angry..WE are being poisoned people learn it accept it then do something different and fight against it.

  • HOW CAN WE FIGHT THIS!!? GOT TO FIND OUT WHOS AT THE SOURCE OF IT ALL.

  • @1billion1deaths1

    use vinegar + water in a humidifier/ vaporizer outside your window and they dissapear. it works!!! keep it turned on for when they come back and respray. spread the word and try it!

  • @hairtogovideos thanks

  • The following video is an example of why the chemtrail spraying participants hate video evidence of chemtrail spraying activities. In the video they cannot explain the trails away as being jet engine contrails because the center trail is going on and off intermittently while the outer trails are not doing this. Contrails do not behave like what's seen in the video.

    Chemtrails: Tell-TAIL Sign of Spraying"

    v=g4-7IQk2Fgo

  • Chemnuts regard this video as ''best evidence'', no wonder they are failing!

  • Here's excellent video footage of a chemtrail being sprayed underneath low altitude clouds where it is impossible for jet engine contrails to form.

    "Bugiardi - Liars (Revisited)"

    v=borEfpulzdc

  • @Skywitness You are posting that fake, hoax video here too? We already established that it has been tampered with to make it look like the trails are beneath the clouds. In reality they are not. You can see the clouds drifting in front of the trails.

  • @vermontapple You've established nothing except the fact that you remain a failed and lying shill.

  • @vermontapple Flat out lie merchant is what you are kid... Fuck you

  • I don't remember hearing confirmation of Barium in chemtrails. This guy found traces of Barium in water in his backyard. I admit that it opens the door to the possibility, but that is very far from confirmation.

  • @fieldmajorstyre wee need to chopp ther heads off.

  • "NBC -affiliated KMIR Reports on chemtrail/geoengineering"

    v=kTI2Ynr9rxM

  • @bluestarbuckscup

    Perpetrators of WHAT?

    Bad maths?

    I agree. The reporters of KSLA should be fired for their inability to use METRIC SI units & get their calculations wrong.

    As a result , MORONS continue to claim that high levels of Barium have been detected in this report.

    In fact the result was 30 times LOWER that the epa safe level of 2000ug/L barium.

    What punishment do you think is appropriate for such MORONS who can't do simple math and the MORONS who mindlessly repeat the error?

  • @Legionoftruthers That comment coming from a moronic agent as you is a laugh blast !

  • @firstwave2

    Neanderthal, what do you think of the fact that Jeff Ferrel admitted he made a huge mistake and that he retracted this report after realising he got his maths wrong.

    In other words he admitted that high levels of barium have NOT been detected.

    Hilariously, this is the very report that tards use to promote the idea of high levels of barium, yet the very basis of that claim is WRONG and admitted by the guy who originated it!

  • @Legionoftruthers That's a funny one- It has no any effect on the basis of anything- Also his report ,your report etc have no standing to me-I have already been to the base seeing the spray nozzles -so agent,you are wasting space on this page reporting to me with more b.s as at the end of the day you have nothing to offer, except for maybe a sleeping aid as you have become most boring ' .

  • The reporter has admitted he was wrong. End of story.

  • 68.8 ug/L means parts per BILLION, not parts per MILLION!

    Translation: 0.00688 ppm. As the world becomes more complected and more difficult to understand, the more these people will hunker-down in their hidey-hole of ignorance, stupidity and, superstition.

  • Chemtrails are the product of spray Nozzles attached to unmarked jet aircraft ' .

  • In Morgellon's Disease (at the later stages) you will find strange fibers growing out of sores on your body. The fibers look like strands of silk and are very scary, if you can imagine something like that growing inside of you.

    There is a red wine test for Morgellon's. Please contact me if you need more information as I perform this test on myself every month.

    I will be happy to show you how to do it properly and at no cost.

  • @lynnegordon ''Morgellons'' is treated as a mental illness, and rightly so!

  • Pay no mind to the failed disinfo shill named chavspotter. Chav was recently caught in a lie when he said the following video has been debunked. Ask him why he keeps running away from providing the so-called debunking evidence.

    "The cumulus proof (III)"

    v=fHgpUSrwWlc

  • @Skywitness

    ""The cumulus proof (III)"

    v=fHgpUSrwWlc "

    So you keep linking to a moron's video where even with an extreme zoom setting the plane is tiny in frame and extremely graded blue due to rayleigh scattering from the 10+km of atmosphere it was filmed through.

    You are beyond pathetic.

    If tankerenema had filmed a plane as low as he claims it would fill frame and not be anywhere as blue scattered.

  • @LegionofLiars In other words, you can't debunk the video because you know it's impossible for you to explain away the chemtrails below the Cumulus clouds as being contrails. Instead of blabbering on endlessly, all you had to do is simply say you can't debunk the video. It's easy to say.

    Hahahaha.....but you are lame. I mean it, you are absolutely lame.

    Btw, none of your friends are able to debunk Tankerenemy's video either. They have all crashed and burned when they tried.

  • @Skywitness

    Hi Loser. The video is debunked. The video debunks itself by showing a plane far too small in frame to be at the altitude claimed. It is PHYSICALLY impossible to be at the altitude claimed because the laws of optics & perspective do not change. The video itself also shows that the contrail is obscured by the layer of cloud claimed to be low cumulus. If the cloud were higher than the contrail then the detail in the contrail would not be obscured as is clearly evident .

    Stop your BS 

  • @Legionoftruthers LOL...your rambling noise and faulty reasoning doesn't debunk anything; but it does show that you lack intelligence. There's no way you, or any of your failing playmates in the shill department, can cover-up the truth of ""The cumulus proof (III)" video. It's not going to happen.

    Your friends have continued in their denial and have reduced themselves to sounding like a bunch of whimpering girlie-men. Looks like you'll be joining them any minute now.

    LOL again....

  • @Skywitness

    Hey LOSER, can you please point out the "nozzles" (ROFLMAO) on USAFFECKC10's video youtube.com/watch?v=VaQ2_yHeNS­M

    I believe you think aerodynamic contrails are caused by santa's elves or mermaids? What was it that you think they are again? Oh ! That's right ! "chemtrails! You must love it that so many smart people laugh AT you rather than with you.

  • @Legionoftruthers Agent, Looks more like 1,431 thumbs up and only 89 down- what does that tell a moron like you- most likely nothing - Ha Ha ha ha, you are a funny one indeed ' .

  • Comment removed

  • @LegionofLiars The funny thing is I'm laughing at you right now because your attempt to change the subject is your way of admitting that you can't debunk Tanker's video.

    Stop worrying what your handlers think about you, and step up to the plate like a man, and just say simply that you can't debunk the video. Go ahead and say it...there's no need to continue acting like a pussy all your life.

  • @Skywitness

    It has already been pointed out to you numerous times that the camera information itself proves Tankerenema's video is BS. A plane at the altitude enema claims it to be CANNOT be so small in frame and so blue light scattered. You just mindlessly repeat inanities about the video but you cannot defend the fact that the plane is tiny in frame even when the camera is fully zoomed. Only a plane at 30,000ft + can appear so small in frame.

    It is also clearly above the clouds in the video.

  • @Legionoftruthers Agent, you sound like a complete total moron ' .

  • @firstwave2

    Well firstwave. Have you figured out whether 68.8ug/L is lower or higher than the EPA safe level of 2000ug/L ?

    I know you might have run out of fingers to count on. Perhaps you can ask a 6 year old to work it out for you.

  • @firstwave2

    ++

  • @chavspotter Everything is a mental illness. Are you overweight, cant control your eating - THATS A DISEASE! Do you smoke? Cant stop? THAT'S A DISEASE!

    Every single adult in America has been labelled as ill either mentally or physically.

    Those of us who are sound in mind and body have to watch this mass mind-fuck on the dumbed-down and still try to help you to wake up.

    I'm getting too old for this!

  • @lynnegordon

    You really need to STFU and stop peddling your snake oil BS for profit.

    Burn in Hell.

  • And it's not just Barium in Chemtrails that we should be concerned about. Chemtrails have been shown to be made up of hundreds of viruses and bacteria. It does appear to be a method of reducing the immunity of the entire human population.

    That sounds HORRIFIC! But if Chemtrails are not harmful to humans, why doesn't the government just come clean and tell us exactly what they are?

    And then, there are those who believe that Chemtrails allow the HAARP Program to work more effectively.

  • It is surprising that the shills hired to comment on Youtube actually believe that anyone is listening to them anymore.

    But you will always know them because when you see through their specious reasoning and their lies, they ALWAYS revert to attacking the person instead of the subject matter.

    Continue to ignore them and they will eventually dry up and blow away, much like their rhetoric.

    But regarding CHEMTRAILS: They are also thought to be the cause of Morgellon's Disease.

  • @lynnegordon

    Rather than writing blithering bullshit, how about you address the FACT that the above video is nonsense.

    68.8ug/L is 0.0688ppm.

    The EPA safe level of Barium is 2000ug/L

    The WHO safe level is 7000ug/L

    Even by the lowest standard the KSLA test is about 30 times lower than the safe level.

  • These people are idiots.

    68.8 ug/L = 68.8 micrograms (millionths of a gram) per litre (1000 grams)

    That equals 68.8 parts per billion

    Divide by 1000 to get parts per million and you get,,,

    0.0688 ppm NOT 6.8 ppm

    They were off by a factor of 100 and nowhere near the action level for barium.

  • There were 8 X Trails over New Orleans yesterday! See my vidoes.. thanks

  • Looks like this chemtrail hoax has finally reached its ultimate fate=oblivion !

  • What in the World are they Spraying ? Just dihydrogen oxide, NOT Barium

    watch?v=NJHvuw-xvuc&feature=fv­sr

  • @Skywitness

    Flyashlooker

    Go look at your dancing and prancing "nano" fly ash particles in your window, nutcase !

  • Are we going to do somethng about this or are we taking it up the tailpipe.

    Maybe shoot one of these planes down will be a good message.

  • @oooAndyooo Your proposal to commit mass murder has been noted.

  • This is very interesting! Maybe this will wake up those that think the government is always so perfect. Also those that mock the ones that look out for the best interest of all of us! In the last days there will be great Deception and we are seeing this NOW!

  • Funny how paranoid uneducated people are so quick to jump on the chemtrail bandwagon. There is no proof that this sample is authentic. These "chemtrail" are 30,000 feet up, and somehow he collected a sample? Also go read the other things in the senate bill. There are fictitious weapons in there, the person who wrote this does not ness. have clearance to know about secret weapons, he was just covering all the bases.

  • @rugnardredbeard Would that also include the scientists that admit they are and have been using these programs for decades?

  • "Particles in the night sky Chemtrail Contrail Related?"

    v=Bvv9TGS22fA

  • THATS SOME SCARY SHIT ....IM NOT READY TO DIE

  • Still no comments from the chemnuts on the actual content of this video....amazing!

  • I have to come clean... Yes its true, i've worked for the government & i know what causes what you call chemtrails: "dihydrogen monoxide." Dihydrogen monoxide is used as an industrial solvent, as an additive in junk food, it accelerate corrosion of some metals, contributes to the green house effect, is fatal if inhaled, gets into the soil & is the major component of acid rain.

  • They also used radiation on Phionex and S.F.

  • Its a chemical base that u breathe in everyday.test one try to grow subject plant a in house with same sunlight as subject b.subject b plant is same as a but the b subject is growing slower than a . why is this?

  • its true.

  • "Another Comparison: Chemtrail Versus Contrail"

    v=kodW75YLGdU

  • An open invitation to all chemnuts. Would any of you like to comment on the actual content of this video, I know it's hard for you but just try once.

  • @kennyclark96080 So where's the truth in this video?

  • @chavspotter Are you still making all those slurping sounds in your videos'

  • @firstwave2 Whatever happened to ''firstwave1'' did he stalk people all the time like you do, go away you creepy little pervert.

  • Does anyone here deny that the units are interpreted incorrectly in this video?

  • @vermontapple No. They try to change the subject.

  • @vermontapple Your friends are extremely nervous about people becoming aware of the low altitude chemtrails. They know jet engine contrails can't form at these low altitudes that do not have the required minus 40 degree temperatures needed for jet engine contrails to form.

    They can't debunk the video evidence of low altitude chemtrails below the Cumulus clouds, so they resort to boldly lying by saying that the trails are far above the Cumulus clouds. They show themselves to be liars.

  • @chavspotter I see you're just talking again....do you care to back up your claim?

  • @chavspotter Hey agent, how are you able to view video's while your head remains up ass .Try having one of your comrades removing it -that could help your focus .

  • @firstwave2 With the intelligence level of an amoeba how are you able to use the internet, does someone help you?

  • @Skywitness Just watch your own video from 2:50 onwards and then try to say that the trails are below the clouds, it is so obvious that they are not. You are deluding yourself, get help!

  • @chavspotter LOL...I like how you left out the time period leading up to 2:50. 2:50 onward is not as clear as the time period before 2:50, but nevertheless the chemtrails are below the Cumulus clouds and if you look closely even from 2:50 onward, you can still see that the chemtrails are below the Cumulus clouds.

    Try again chav.

  • @Skywitness Seriously, I think your delusional problems are at a point where you should seek professional help.

  • @chavspotter Is that all you got? That little parting shot of your opinion of me as you ran away again. You fizzled out quick, especially since you know I'm right about what I said concerning you purposely leaving out the time period leading up to the time of 2:50.

  • Comment removed

  • @ChemtrailTruthNow he/she's probably a government agent

  • @xDarkside101x And of course you are are a shit licker.

  • @firstwave2 And you are an unintelligent fuck using that kind of language. Go watch a video that suits your level of intelligence, internet tough guy

  • @vermontapple No, just you and your comrade shrills'.

  • The threefangedcat is of course a paid gov. shrill.

  • @firstwave2 You give as much evidence for your ad hominem on me as you do for this video being valid: none in any case. Nothing new there.

  • @ThreeFangCat you mean to tell me, yet again, that you are a idiot - I already know that, no need for you to repeat it .

  • @firstwave2 No, I clearly didn't say that, but you seem to like saying it as you have little else outside of ad hominem. Or maybe you like the straw man approach. Your choice.

    PS: The units are STILL converted wrong, there is STILL no control, and the sampling technique was STILL questionable. This video... yup, just as much STILL bunk as 6 months ago.

  • @firstwave2 Yep, Fang definitely has all the attributes of a failed government shrill.

  • Threefangedcat has nothing to do in his life but to comment on the same video fir over a year now. I think that in itself would lead me to believe that hes odd and very weird. Get a life threefangedcat. Chemtrails are real wether this video is debunked of not. But I know you'll comment about this and again I will laugh at how pathetic you look. Even the past viewers think your pathetic.

  • @stairs021 If chemtrails are real whether this video is debunked or not, why do chemtrailers care?

    As for me, I'm an odd duck. I'm OK with that, and other people's opinions don't really change much.

  • This is stupid. 68.8 micrograms/liter is 68.8 parts per BILLION, not million. All this fuss because a stupid reports sucks at math

  • "Chemtrails and Willful Ignorance"

    watch?v=oRh7FXu_99w

  • Disinfo failures such as chav, a1mint, and 3Fang, hate when anyone speaks of evidence of chemtrails existing below the Cumulus clouds. They cannot refute this kind of evidence because they know contrails can only exist in temperatures below minus 40 degrees. A chemtrail below the Cumulus clouds can never be a jet contrail because temperatures under a Cumulus cloud are not minus 40 degrees.

    "The cumulus proof (III)"

    watch?v=fHgpUSrwWlc

  • @Skywitness If you wish to call me a disinfo failure, the least you could do is show where I am incorrect. You haven't done that. Instead, you throw around ad hominem as a cheap substitute.

    As for the trails you mention, I have made it clear I am not into atmospheric science. It would take substantial research to understand the claim you are making and how your assumption set factors into your conclusion.

    Regardless, your claim, it doesn't change the fact the chemistry in this video is bunk.

  • @ThreeFangCat It's not hard to understand what I said, here's why....NASA says the following about jet engine contrails: "contrails only form at very high altitudes (usually above 8 km) where the air is extremely cold (less than -40 degrees C)."

    In the video I linked to, contrails cannot form under those clouds because the temperature is not -40 degrees. Nor is the altitude of the base of the clouds in the video at or above 26,000 feet. Those can only be chemtrails in the video. Got it now?

  • @Skywitness As I said, I'm not an atmospheric scientist and it would take a lot of time and effort to learn it properly. I prefer to put my free time into other things. However, you are clearly committing the logical fallacy of false dilemma (aka black and white thinking), so your attempt at science doesn't matter.

    PS: This video's units STILL converted wrong, STILL no control, STILL sloppy sampling technique; this video STILL bunk.

  • @ThreeFangCat C'mon now Fang....you hiding behind the excuse that you're not an atmospheric scientist is not reason enough to not acknowledge what is clearly in your face.

    I know it hurts you, just like it hurts all the other failed shills when they can't get around the truth that is plain to see. Your comments show that the truth about chemtrail spraying pains you because you can't cover it up.

  • @Skywitness Your analysis is still flawed by the logically fallacy of false dilemma / black and white thinking even IF you got the science right. You still think science boils down to simple rules that take no background or training to understand or apply. My statement of insufficient knowledge to argue the case might seem odd to you.

    What hasn't changed is the chemistry in this video is pure bunk. Yet, chemtrailers have been coming here for 6 months to try to change the subject. Interesting.

  • @ThreeFangCat No need to explain...I understand that you have to avoid the subject of low altitude chemtrails because you can't debunk their existence. Take LegionofLiars for example, he is running around like a chicken without a head, causing various distractions, all because he knows he can't debunk the video evidence of the low altitude chemtrails.

  • @Skywitness Outside of the fact your video is entirely based on a logical fallacy, and is automatically irrelevant for that reason, you also have a challenge to one of your critical assumptions by Legion. Despite how eager you seem to be to discuss this video with me, I haven't seen your response on that issue. Interesting.

    Of course, that doesn't change the fact that this video's science still has a unit conversion error, no control, and horrible sampling procedure. Thus, this video is bunk.