Added: 2 years ago
From: scarface4G63
Views: 18,635
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • an Evo IX cost 20,000 and a civic costo 3,000 year 95 so that means that if I had 20,000. I buy a civic and invest in the civic 3,000 more I still beat an evo and. still have 14,000 to go shopping jajajaj Evo fail

  • FUCK HONDAs JAJA

  • The evo x did 12.1 @ 113 or the ix?

    That x sounds sick btw

  • You guys give evo owners bad rep.

  • beautiful cars both of them

  • I hope you guys get caught and have your licenses revoked. Take it to the track before your stupidity kills someone.

  • @ApexIXMR hey since when are you Mr. public defender? if people are street racing then normal drivers should get out of the way lmao.

  • @sicsicsicdrummer cmon man you know thats a load of shit, personally if you are driving on a road and an EVO comes at 120 and kills you I dont think "but the "normal" drivers should get out of the way" is gunna cut it man

  • Yup, Alan did work with that 11.07 @ 127... But his setup is much different

  • well that car just wound up taking over the world record mph on street tires last weekend..11.07 @ 127mph.......

  • fuckin dumbasses "team Kaos bout to take that W" nd then u lost smh

  • the evo X was a GSR aka 5 speed... and to harris1169... if you wanna come to the next race thats fine, i used to own a "neon" too... hahahaha, and to chrisevolution8, thank you for the kind words... for the record a little update, my evo went 12.1 @ 113 first pass first time out, took 2nd place at Evo vs STi Day, which was 95 degree weather, 1.8 60', spinning 1st gear.... going for the top 20 fastest stock turbo evo list ! wish me luck

  • lol since when was 113 a fast trap and since when was 12.1 worth posting up about being fast enought to talk shit online?

    i was @ evo/sti day, and it was embarassing showing. to see all these 400hp evo's running low 12's and stock turbo evo's doing no better is definately worth bragging about.

  • haters gonna hate, but didnt you go 13.2 in your neon ??? i dont think you have much of a leg to stand on.... if you think you can do better or even beat me, why not come to new york and find out... by the way, none of that roll racing BS... thats an excuse for people that cant drive....

  • @scarface4G63

    Let the haters hate man. He drives a neon.

  • 13.2@106 is the one on youtube lol, the car was just running a 3"DP on street tires.

    The car was stock turbo over the spring and went 11.8's trapping 118 all day. IMO, thats a strong street car. Set something up for after the holidays man I have no problem coming out and running. Run what you brung.

  • you talk about evos running low 12's like they brag.

    I ran 12.0 flat with bolt ons and a tune. 12.4 with a TBE and mail in flash.

    Your 11.8 isnt exaclty impressive and I guarantee you dont scare any Evo owners with that.

  • i wasnt saying any evo drivers are scared of a 11 sec srt. shit ill take the mid 12 sec stock turbo evo over the 11 sec srt on the streets all day if im putting my money on it.

    half the time the srt wont hook on the street. i was running high 11's with no tune, no ecu, stock fmic/im/tb/exhaust mani/88k turbo and trans. no suspension mods, just slicks. to say there was more left in it before i switched setups is an understatement

  • I used to roll with some srt-4s and I know they are quick. One was running high 11's all day on slicks.

    But you have no tune, no supporting mods and stock turbo and you run high 11's?

    A high octane tune is a must to run those numbers with stock turbo.

  • It was a nitrous setup stock turbo at that point last year. 75 shot/24.5" slick/adjustable wga/exhaust. Stock ecu holding me under 20psi with fuel cut, stock suspension etc.i had the mph for mid 11's but never dialed in the 2 step

  • @scarface4G63 Nice comeback, great words for haters that are talking shit just because they're jealous.

  • @Red908Neon

    is this guy serious? He has a neon and he's saying a 113 in the 1/4 isn't good? FOr street driven evo's?

  • why wouldnt I be serious?

    Since when was a "quick" car trapping 113 impressive?

    Honestly its almost 2010 dude, a bolt on/tuned evo 9/10 should have no problem running 11's, let alone trapping upwards of 115 with some race gas tossed into the mix.

  • whens the next race? i'll be there, i own a "neon"

  • nice race. 9 driver was pretty good.

  • Evo 9 SE vs Evo 9 MR....Who wins?

  • They are the same car only difference is the 5 vs 6 speed. Stock for stock the MR should edge out the SE due to closer gear ratios. Getting closer to 120 trap speeds the MR and 9 is general with have to shift one more time so the SE should win that one.

    Getting closer to 130 MPH an Evo 8 should win because the 4th gear is longer and they won't have to shift into 5th to get to 130 on stock gear ratio within the stock turbo's efficiency range.

  • evo x driver is not as good ix driver...pretty evenly matched cars though

  • both evos are wack

  • gottissues gonna eat you son

  • call SRT's tissues? What the hell is that suppose to mean? Wipe ur tears when u lose to a Neon. Those EVOs where both slow!

  • Got tissues is the nick name of the person I believe and 99% of all Evos are slow to you man lol

  • bump for FACE!!!!

  • evo x nice car but i take ix

  • that X needs to launch better

  • it the x was a mr then it is limited to 50% power during a launch . the stock clutch is only good for about 350hp . i hope these guys werent dumb enough to get the paddle shifting bullshit

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more