@akmnawab110 SO OU GOT MORE SENSE THAN THE ULEMA LOL HOW ABOUT YOUR SCHOLORS WHO SAY SEX CHANGES ARE OKAY HOMOSEXUALITY IS FINE PROSTITUTION IS OK GO LOOK IN THE MIRRIOR
@12hamida I have provided you numerous evidence to prove the fact that yazeed (la) was responsible for the murder of Maula Hussain (as). Just click "see all comments" located on the bottom right of this page to see the posts that you continue to deny.
Also, how can you associate the term "ra" with someone as evil as yazeed (la)? Once again, I've provided you numerous historical contexts from shia & sunni historians that prove yazeed (la) to be an enemy of islam.
Sibt Ibn Jauzi in his Tadhkira, page 63, says that some of the people of Medina went to Syria in 62 A.H. When they learned of the sinful deeds of Yazid, they returned to Medina, broke their allegiance to him, cursed him, and turned out his Governor, Uthman Bin Abi Sufyan.
@12hamida "Abdullah Bin Hanzala (Ghusilu'l-Mala'ikat) said: "O people, we did not revolt against Yazid until we verified that he was an irreligious man. He killed the descendants of the Prophet, illegally associates with mothers, daughters, and sisters, drinks wine, and does not offer the ritual prayer."
@12hamida Ibn Kathir records that Ibn Ziyad wrote to Umar Ibn Sa`d:
“Become obstacle between Hussain and water, treat them in the way Ameer al Momineen Uthman was treated and ask him and his companions to give bayah to Ameer al Momineen Yazid bin Muawiyah”
@12hamida So you don't accept "shia sources"? Once again, Allah (swt) himself noted in the quraan that the term "shia" is associated with those who are his followers. By you saying anything derogatory against shias, you are insulting Allah's (swt) followers, and that is a sin. Again, you contradict the quraan (Allah's words). Here is the exact words from the quran, no "context" needed:
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
@akmnawab110 AND ONCCE AGAIN SHIA DDOES NOT MEAN THE SHIA OF ALI RA YOU ARE MISINTERPERTING QURAN THAT IS MY ISSUE WITH YOU READ TAFISIR STOP TRANSLATING QURAN BY YOUR DESIRES
@12hamida Do you think Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) can lie, or say anything against Allah's (Swt) own words? The Prophet (pbuh) is cited as saying: "O Ali! On the Day of Judgment I shall resort to Allah and you will resort to me and your children will resort to you and the Shia will resort to them. Then you will see where they carry us. (i.e. to Paradise)" - Sunni reference: Rabi al-Abrar, by al-Zamakhshari
@akmnawab110 youare a liar i know that when did i show malice against hussein ra you shia even beleive allah lies i can showe you proof okay what is your point about these hadith show me one that yazeed ra killed hussein
@12hamida You 're contradicting yourself again, and this is clearly evident to everyone when they click "see all comments' because you have gone out of your way to negate Maula Hussain's (as) journey to save islam at karbala on more than one occasion.
Once again, I've showed you countless citations identifying yazeed (la) as the amir (la) of shimr (la), ibne ziyad (la), and the over-all mastermind behind the murder of the Prophet's Grandson. Click "see all comments".
Ibn Asakir records (in Mishbaath ba Sunnath page 219) a hadith on the authority Hadhrath Ayesha: "Oh Allah never shower your blessings on the cursed, killer Yazeed, he will rebel against my beloved Husayn and martyr him"
@12hamida Ibn Katheer in Al Bidayah Volume 8 page 222 stated:
" We have already mentioned that he had Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (s) Husayn and his companions. In those three days in Madina, it is difficult to mention the type of acts that were carried out. By doing this act Yazeed wanted to secure his governance, in the same way Allah (swt) broke the neck of every Pharoah, the true King (swt) also broke the neck of Yazeed.’"
@12hamida Ahmed Bin Daud Abu Hanifa Dinawari records the statement of Ibn Ziyad:
“I killed Al Hussain due to the reason that he revolted against our Imam [Yazid] and the very Imam[Yazid] sent me the message to kill Al Hussain. Now if the murder of Hussain is a sin then Yazid is responsible for it”
Akhbaar Tawaal, page 279 (Egypt) by Ahmed Bin Daud Abu Hanifa Dinwari
@akmnawab110 here is somtething for you to choke on if you dont wanna beleive me listen to your despicible anal sex allowing ulema in this video look upo on youutbe(WHO KILLED IMAM HUSSEIN A SHIA IRANIAN PERSIAN KILLED AHAL BAIT &HUSSEN. YOUR SHIA IMAMS PROVE YOU RAFIDI KILLED HUSSEIN HASSAN ALI
@12hamida Once again, please refer to all of the previous comments I have made which answer your repeated baseless claims. Everything you claim is easily refuted based on the fact that it contradicts simple logic and the quraan.
1) the Quraan, which is Allah's (swt) own words, mentions on multiple occasions that the term "shia" is to be used to refer to FOLLOWERS OF ALLAH (SWT). Our Prophets (pbut), and their followers, were referred to as "Shia" in the quran.
@akmnawab110 YOU ONCE AGAIN ARE TAKING QURAN AND HADITH OUT OF CONTEXT TYPICAL SHIA TACTIC HOW DO YOU QUOTE BUKHARI WHEN SHIA DONT BELEIVE IN BUKHARI LOL ACCORDING TO YOU RAFIDI ALL OF SUNNI ARE KAFIRS YOURCLAIMS ARE CONTRADICTORY
@12hamida Shias refer to Bukhari, a sunni source, because it 100% authenticates the justification of the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Remember something, Allah (swt) sent down four books, Zuraat, injeel (bible), torat (torah) & the Quran. Before the quran's revelation, the former three were sent by Allah (swt) to promote the laws of Islam, but were corrupted. Even though those three were corrupted, we still consider them holy. This is the same with bukhari.
@akmnawab110 LOL OH REALLY DAMN WHAT A RAFIDI CONTRADICTION SO NOW YOU SAY BUKHARI IS HOLY THATS FUNNY BECAUSE ALL YOUR SCHOLORS SAY ALL HADITH IN THERE ARE WRITTEN BY APOSTATES AND KAFIRS LOOKI ON YOU TUBE SHIA RAFIDI ALL SAY BUKHARI IS BOOKS BY SUNNI KAFIRS YOUU SOUND SO CONFUSED
@12hamida When Allah (swt) himself has claimed that Shias are followers, how dare you, or any other wahabi contradicts Allah (Swt) and say that shias are responsible for the murder of the personality who died protecting islam? Obviously, there is a contradiction in your reference of term, especially since Shias mourn Imam Hussain's (as) sacrifice because his martyrdom at the hands of yazeed (la) lead an enlightenment amongst the world that re energized the sole worship of Allah (Swt) & his will.
@akmnawab110 YOU RAFIDI MOURN HUSSEIN RA DEATH CAUSE OIF THE GUILT OF BETRAYING HIM EVEN ALI RA KNEW YOU RAFIDI WHERE BACKSTABBERS YOU ARE TAKING TERM IN SHIA OUT OF CONTEXT HOW BOUT WHEN ALLAH SAYS DONT BE SHIA IN QURAN 6-159 LOL HE DID NOT DIE PROTECTING ISLAM HE HUSSEIN RA WENT AGAINST ADVICE OF SHURA AND MADE A MISTAKE AND WAS WARNED THATS WHERE SHIMAR THE SHIA KILLED HIM DID YOU LOK AT YOUTUBE SIGHT I SENT YOU YOUR OWN SCHOLORS ADMIT SHIA KILLED HUSSEIN RA
@12hamida once again, the common wahabi (la) propaganda is to destroy islam by spreading false statements/rumors based on ignorance and pure hatred for the Prophet (pbuh) and his family.
Just look at the previous comments, I used authentic citations that identify yazeed ibne muwaiya (la) as the absolute enemy of islam, yet you continue to refer to him as someone who deserves praise
@akmnawab110 WHAT THE PROPAGANDA THAT IS IN YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU KEEP POINTING OUT YAZEED RA WAS ADRUNK AND ETC IS IRRELEVANT TO ME A SINNER IS NOT TALKING OUT OF FOLD OF ISLAM DID HE DO BAD THINGS OF COURSE I AGREE BUT MY POINT IS THE RAFIDI STILL BETRAYED HUSSEIN RA YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES HE ORDERED KILLING
"@akmnawab110 WHAT THE PROPAGANDA THAT IS IN YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU KEEP POINTING OUT YAZEED RA WAS ADRUNK AND ETC IS IRRELEVANT TO ME A SINNER IS NOT TALKING OUT OF FOLD OF ISLAM DID HE DO BAD THINGS OF COURSE I AGREE BUT MY POINT IS THE RAFIDI STILL BETRAYED HUSSEIN RA YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES HE ORDERED KILLING
12hamida 6 hours ago"
even more contradictions. You basically admit that yazeed (la) was a despot, sinner, and murderer of Imam Hussain (as), but you associate RA?
@12hamida what's worse is, you praise yazeed (la) even after you admit that he killed the Prophet's (pbuh) grandson, but then you continue to make baseless claims that "shias" were responsible for the killing.
@akmnawab110 you are a despicible liar show me one time i admitted yazeed killed hussein i said shiamar the shia killed hussein ra is your taqiyah kicking in now our deceit
@12hamida "betraying"? Maula Ali (as) wrote in Nahjul Balagha, Letter 10 to muwaiya (la),
"you have challenged me to a battle. I accept your challenge, but I have a proposal to make....Let us, you and I have a single combat. Let it be a combat unto death...Let the world see and realize who is the sinner and who has forgotten Allah (swt) and the day of judgement. Will you accept this invitation of mine?..Are you a man to face death boldy and bravely, or are you merely a vampire"
@12hamida Once again, Maula Ali (as) wrote in Nahjul Balagha, Letter 10 to muwaiya (la), the father of yazeed (la),:
"Remember mu'awiya (la)! Though I am old, I am still Abul Hasan (as), the man who killed your maternal grandfather, your uncle and your brother in single combats in the battle of badr.."
Once again, you contradict yourself when you attack Shias (Allah's followers) with baseless claims such as "betraying imams". Maula Ali (as) clearly identifies muwaiya (la) as an enemy of islam.
@akmnawab110 ANYTGHING WRITTTEN IN SHIA BOOKS HOLD NO WIEGHT THE CHAIN OF NARRATORS IN SHIA BOOKS ARE MISTERIOUS EVEN SHIA ADMITY TO THIS FABRICATED HADITH ETC
@12hamida Read Najhul Balagah's letters 9 and 10, Maula Ali (as) identifies yazeed's (la) progeny, specifically his father mauwiya (la) as enemies of Islam. Not one shia associates him/herself with muwiya (la) or his yazeed (la) because they were enemies of islam. You, on the other hand, have praised mawiya (la) and yazeed (la). This clearly shows how you are an enemy of islam.
@akmnawab110 IT IS YOUR CREED TO BASH DOES PEOPLE AND OTHERS TO JUSTIFY YOUR CULT WITHOUT CURSING SAHABA THE SHAI HAVE NO DEEN TO JSUTIFY NOR A LEG TO STAND ON THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING RA AFTER THERE NAMES MAY ALLAH FORGIVE THEM FOR THERE SINS AND BLESS THEM WITH PARADISE
@12hamida I have provided authentic citations that identify umar (la) and abu bakr (la) as the culprits who murdered Bibi Fatima binte Mustafa (sa). This is the same Bibi Fatima (sa) that the Prophet of Islam labeled "The Chief of All Women".
How can you associate something as prestigious as (ra) to anyone who has been cited in every text to commit murder against members of the Prophet's family? This is the same family Allah (swt) has honored in the quran!
@12hamida Why did Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) go to badr and uhud then? Whenever you wahabis attack the legitimacy of Maula Hussain's (as) journey to save Islam in karbala, the quran contradicts your baseless statement. Why did Prophet Ibrahim prepare to sacrifice Hz. Ismail? The "shura" would've gone against that too, but it was revealed to Ibahim by Allah (swt), so he and Hz. Ismail proceeded to do it because if Hz. Ibrahim did not, he would go against the revelation of sacrifice in Islam.
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN YOU CANNOT COMAPARE HUSSEIN RA TO RASSOL OR IBRAHIM AS HUSSEIN RA MADE A MISTAKE ADMIT IT YOU CANT CAUSE IF YOU DO HIS INFALLIBILITY HAS NO CREDIT
@12hamida The Messenger of Allah said: "Husain is from me and I am from Husain." Sunni references: (1) Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v4, p172 (2) Fadha'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, p772, Tradition #1361 (3) al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p 177 (4) Amali, by Abu Nu'aym al-Isbahani, p 64 (5) al-Kuna wal Asmaa, by al-Dulabi, v1, p88 (6) al-Tabarani, v3, p21 (7) Adab by al-Bukhari, also al-Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah (8) al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 3, p291
@12hamida The ayat solidifying the Ahlulbayt's (pbut) infallibility (Quran verse 33:33) states that, "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul- Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification"
The reason why they (pbut) were granted infallibility is because they represent the perfect religion. yazeed's (la) main purpose was to destroy islam, hence why he demanded bayat. Maula Hussain would never allow yazeed (la). to imperfect Islam.
@akmnawab110 THIS AYAT IS ABOUT THE WIVES OF PROFET NOT ALI HUSSEIN OR ALI OR FATIMA LIAR READ THE VERSE CORRECTLY IT IS IRONIC BOTH TIMES ALLAH MENTIONS AHLA BAIT IT IS ABOUT A WOMEN LOL MAY ALLOAH CURSE YOUR CULT
@12hamida I've answered your baseless claim about this in previous posts. "verily Allah has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward" - (33:29) If all the Prophet's wives were well-dowers, then there was no need for Allah to say this. Allah would have said, "all of you will receive a great reward".
@akmnawab110 it is clear from your statements your islamic knowledge is not there this ayat is a ordr from allah this ayat is reffered to as a ayat of ethics to wives it has nothing to do with ali hussein hassan fatima RA where do you majicians come up with these stories lol may allah curse be on the liars
@12hamida your replies are as baseless as your claims. The ayat from the quran clearly states that not all wives of the Prophet are the same, and those who participate in misconduct will be severely punished. In Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5 Tradition 166, Aisha herself narrates how she was jealous. In Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 155, Aisha states that she frequently angered the Prophet (pbuh). Anger & Jealousy, two things not associated with someone who is infallible.
@akmnawab110 ALLAH USED THIS PATTERN OF SPEECH TO ADDRESS MANY PEOPLE CONSIDER THESE AYATS( 8:11)(9:103)(5:6)VERSE 33:33 WAS NOT MEANT TO MAKE ANYONE INFALLIBLE BUT RATHER SIMPLY EXPIATE THEM FOR PAST MISTAKES AND ERRORS THIS IS YOUR DIFFICULITY RAFIDI THE QURAN IS A WTINESS AGAINST YOUR FALSE IDEOLOGY
@12hamida Once again, you are wrong. ayat 33:33 clearly states:
"Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul- Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification"
The KEYWORDS are "EVERY KIND OF UNCLEANNESS". If someone were to commit a sin in the past, that would mean that until the day of judgment they are still unclean, and that is a taint on their iman. The Ahlulbayt (pbut) were clean from the very beginning.
@12hamida cleansing has degrees and is of different types. If ones hand and face become dirty, and then if he washes them with soap and warm water they will become cleansed. Verse (5:6) also tells us by ablution one can become cleansed. If somebody argues that the degree of cleansing with ablution is not any more than cleansing the hands and face with soap, then what will be your answer to him? You will tell him that ablution make different type of cleansing than of washing the body by soap.
@akmnawab110 AND EVEN SO THE WIVES ARE PART OF AHLA BAIT SO THIS IS YOUR DIFFICULITY THIS AYAT ONCE AGAIN IS A COMMANDMENT FORM ALLAH SWT TO THE WIVES TO ACT IN CERTAIN MANNER YOU CONTRADICT YOUR SELF EVERYTIME YOU TALK YOUR HATRED FOR ISLAM DOES THIS TOO YOU YOU WILL NOT SUCSEED IN DESTRYOING THE DEEN YOU RAFIDI TROLL LOL YOU RAFIDI THE QURAN IS A WITHNESS TO YOUR FILTH
@12hamida once again, you display your other ignorance and hatred.
1) The Ahlulbayt (pbut) refers to PERFECTION! Allah (Swt) stated that he has removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (33.33)
2) aisha (la) and hafsa (la) cannot be considered within the Ahlulbayt because verse 33:30 clearly states that the WIVES of the Prophet who participate in misconduct will be punished (sin), which means they're not perfect.
3) I posted sunni references of Aisha & hafsa's misconduct below.
@akmnawab110 once again THERE WAS NO MISCONDUCT THAT YOU JKEEP PROCLAIMING SHIA BARK THSI RHETORIC ALLL THE TIME YOUR HATRED FOR ISLAM MAKES YOU DO THIS. SO THE PROFET IS BURIED WHERE A EVIL PERSON LIVED AT LOL LISTEN TO YOUR SELF MAY ALLAH MAKE YU MUSLIM RAFIDI
@12hamida In Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5 Tradition 166, Ayesha herself narrates:
"I did not feel jealous of any of the wives of the Prophet as much as I did of Khadija though I did not see her, but the Prophet used to mention her very often, and whenever he slaughtered a sheep, he would cut its parts & send them to the women friends of Khadija. When I sometimes said to him, "(You treat Khadija in such a way) as if there is no woman on earth except Khadija,"
@akmnawab110 IN SAHIH BUKHAR VOL 7 BOOK #62 HADITH 157
NARRATES
I HEARD ALLAH APOSTLE ON PULPIT SAYING BANU HASIM BIN MUGHIRA HAVE REQUESTED ME TO ALLOW THEM TO MARRY DAUGHTERS TO ALI IBN TALIB BUT I DONT GIVE PERMISSION UNLESS ALI RAD DIVORCES MY DAUGHTERS IN ORDER TO MARRY THERE DAUGHTERS ,BECAUSE FATIMA IS A PART OF MY BODY AND I HATE WAHT SHE HATES TO SEE AND WHAT HURTS HER HURTS ME
@akmnawab110 SO ALI DID HURT ALLAH AND MUH ACCORDING TO YOUR FABRICATED SOURCES HE DID NOT HURT HER BUT DID NOT MIND WATCHING HER GET HURT LOL CLEAR CONTRADICTION YOUR DEBATING SKILLS ARE TERRIBLE.ALI HURT FATIMA EMOTIOONALLY HE WANTED TO MARRY ABU JAHLS DAUGHTER IT IS IN SHIA BOOKS ALSO
@12hamida I just refuted your absurd claims with legitimacy. Everything you've posted so far has just worked against you. lol. You've contradicted yourself, again. I'll be back later in the day to laugh at your hatred and ignorance. Until then, I dare you to be a man and read all the proof I've provided you.
@akmnawab110 you are dellusional person i think zanjeer has got to yur head and mentally messed you up why do you beleive sunni hadith and not shai hadith refutying shia is simple you shai dont have tawhid only shirk
@12hamida The following authentic Sunni sources confirm that verse 33:33 was in reference to Maula Ali (as):
-Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.
-al-Mustadrak by al-Hakim, Chapter of "Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, p148.
@12hamida Its absolutely absurd of you to make such an ignorant claim. The quran clearly states that Allah (swt) has removed all impurities from Maula Ali (as). This is widely accepted by all strong narrations from shias & sunnis. If anything contradicts the quran then its clearly false, and this irrational statement of yours that, naozabillah, Maula hurt Allah (swt), is in clear contradiction of verse 33:33, which is impossible since the quran is absolutely perfect.
@akmnawab110 once again shia do not beleive quran is perfect your scholors admit this you are a delliusional person that well lie at all cost to get point across it is know where sunni beleive ali ra was kalipahte after rassol i can give you references from shia books that beleive quran not perfect you are a liar taqiyah is being used but not working
@12hamida Not one scholar from the shia fiqh denies the perfection of the quran. Just like the masoomeen, the quran is infallible; Hence, the reason why shias like me reference it to refute wahabi rhetoric like yours.
If you have any references, post them because I will guarantee that I will prove them false just like i've done for everything else you've posted up.
@12hamida the second thing Volume 7, Book 62, Number 157 provides is:
2) exposing your utter ignorance.
- This narration serves as a hypothetical, and not as something of a fact. If hatred for Allah (swt) wasn't clouding your judgment, you would realize the context of this narration is based on an "IF"..All it does is provides the superiority of Bibi Fatima (sa), and warns of the consequences faced by people who hurt her (ex umar & abu bakr).
@akmnawab110 EXACTLY THE PROFET WARNED HIM HIS INTENTION WAS CLEAR HE WAS GOING TO MARRY HER UNTIL HE WAS STOPPED BY PROFET SO YOUR CLAIM IS BASELESS ALI DI HURT PROFET AND FATIMA IN THIS INCIDENT AND OTHERS ALSO ACCORDING TO SHIA BOOKS YOUR HATRRED FOR RASSOL IS EVEIDENT
@12hamida I've refuted every absurd comment of yours with legitimacy. Take a look. I'm giving you 12 hours to answer my recent posts with something credible.
@akmnawab110 i have refuted you in all possible means it is hard to get threw to a person who does not even beleive in his own hadith and lies on quran every shia hadith is against your creed why have you not commented on sermons from imam ali in nahal balaga i see you stayed silent about that lol U CANT HANDLE THE THRUTH
@akmnawab110 hey rafidi these things you come up with i found all on shia web sites lol COME ON DO BETTER OF COURSE THEY WILL FABRICATE AND LIE I HAVE REFUTED ALL YOUR COMMENTS DEFEND THE SERMONS OF ALI NOT BEING INFFALLIBLE AND MAKING MISTAKES
@akmnawab110 those references you cite are not credible due to fact shia only cut certain text of books and not all of books message you know similiar like what you rafidi do to quran so your 12 hours have been cut to 2 seconds all your references are on shia web sites that promote lies and hatrred for deen of islam show me the whole book then we can debate those things
@akmnawab110 it is funny you have not mentioned nothing about sermon of ali rad claiming he made mistakes proving he is not infallible lol THEN YOU BACK TRACK AND ALL OF SUDDEN SAY FATIMA RA IS NOT INFALLIBLE LOL MAKE UP YOUR MIND RAFIDI YOU ARE CONSTANTLY CONTRADICTING YOURSELF YOU EVEN DENY YOUR SOURCES
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #6
In this narration, aisha (la) clearly states that the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) clearly stated that he, along with Maula Ali (as), Bibi Fatima (sa) and Maula Hassan (as) & Hussain (as) are those who verse 33:33 refers to, hence they are free from sin.
@akmnawab110 okay and what is your point i beleive that but free from sin of what you say and i say are different WE BELEIVE THEY ARE FREE FROM SHIRK IN THERE BELIEIF WHILE SHAI HAVE TWISTED CONCEPT WHY HAVE YOU NOT ANSEARED ABOUT SERMON 216 OF IMAM ALI RA IN NAHAL BALAGA HE ADMITS HE MAKES MISTAKES AND IS NOT PERFECT LOL THAT HUSHES YOU UP FAST I SEE CAUSE YOUR BOOKS CONTRADICT YOUR STATEMENT
@12hamida As Allah (swt) as my witness, and he being the only one worthy of worship, I have the Nahjul Balagah in front of me. I opened it to the sermon you have referenced, Sermon 216, and in this short paragraph Maula Ali (as) discusses nothing of what you have said. You are clearly lying, and Allah's (swt) lanat is on you for lying!
@akmnawab110 lol NNY BECAUSE I HAVE IT TOO LETS CHALLENGE ALL WHO HAVE IT TO OPEN IT UP AND READ IT FOR A CHANGE IT IS CLEAR YOU CANT REFUTE IT AND DENY IT SO YOUR CLAIM IS IT IS NOT THERE YOU ARE DESPICIBLE YOU ARE RIGHT ALLAH SAYS LANAT ON THE LIARS YOU
@12hamida FINE, NO PROBLEM WITH THAT BECAUSE YOU'RE A LIAR. I HAVE CHECK THREE DIFFERENT NAHJUL BALAGAH'S AND ALL OF THEM CONCUR THAT SERMON 216 IS ABOUT MAULA ALI (AS) PASSING BY THE CORPSE OF talha and abd ar rahman.
I posted the sermon to show just how much of a lanati liar you are.
@akmnawab110 LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE.BUT WHEN ALLAH REMINDS YOU OF WHAT YOU USED TO SAY.YOU WILL BE LOSER JUST WORSHIP ALLAH WITH NO SHIRK .STOP CURSING COMPANIONS AND WIVES.MAY ALLAH GUIDE YOU I HAVE DONE MY PART TO HELP.
@12hamida RUN LIKE UMAR (LA)! In the end, I PROVED THAT YOU CANNOT DENY THE FACTS BECAUSE YOU'RE AN ENEMY OF ISLAM! I used straight ayats and authentic hadeeth and this is finally the result:
"LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE" - @12hamida
@akmnawab110 SINCE ARE DEBATES EVERY RAFIDI HADITH I POST YOU ARE QUICK TOO SAY IT IS A LIE INSTEAD OF REFUTING MY CLAIM YOU SAY IT IS A FABRICATION WELL YOUR WHOLKE RELIGION IS A FABRICATION AND A LIE YOU KNOW THIS TOO THE AHLA BIDA WELL GO TO ALL MEASURES AND DESPERATION TO PROVE BASELESS CLAIMS
@12hamida every single post you've made has been answered in a credible manner. Nothing you've posted has a bit of legitimacy to it. Besides that, you've been posting up lies that I've exposed as well.
@akmnawab110 YOU CURSING ALLAH NAME IS YOUR PROBLEM DIGGING A DEEPER HOLE FOR YOUR SELF.I TOLD YOU IN YOUR DELLLUSIONAL MIND YOU THINK YOU HAVE DEFEATED ME BUT IT IS NOT ABOUT THAT IT IS NOTHING I CAN SAY TO YOU TO BELEIVE IN ALLAH AND RASSOL.YOUR 12 GODS WELL NEVER BE BETTER THAN ALLAH OR RASSOL .YOU HAVE POSTED NOTHING LEGITIMATE LOOK AT ALL STUFF I POSTED YOUR ONLY REFUTE IS IT IS A LIE WHEN SHAI BOOKS SAY IT IS NOT
@12hamida Who curses Allah's (swt) name other than yourself by praising his enemies (mauwiya & yazeed). each and every baseless claim of yours has been refuted. You've accepted defeat already by being proven a liar & saying " LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE"
@akmnawab110 DO THE LAYMEN SHIA KNOW BETTER THAN MAJLISI HILLALI KULANI KHOMENI ETC.THIS IS RAFIDI DIFFICULITY YOUR TRICKS AND TACTICS DONT WORK THE QURAN AND SUNNAH IS A WITNESS AGAINST YOUR CULT.EVERY SHIA HADITH I POSTED YOU GET OFFENDED BUT ONLY PROBLEM IM NOT SAYING IT IT IS YOUR SCHOLORS WHO WROTE IT YOU CANT DEFEND KUFR .
@akmnawab110 LOL SOUND LIKE A DEFEATED SHIA LISTEN TO YOUR HYPOCRICY.IT IS NOT OKAY FOR ME TO SAY YOU TAKE SUNNI HADITH OUT OF CONTEXT BUT IT IS OK FOR YOU TO SAY IT.FACE IT AND ADMIT IT YOU ARE EMBARRASSED OF YOUR BOOKS CANT DEFEND THEM NO HADITH I POSTED IS A LIE THATS YOUR TACTIC BECAUSE YOU CANT DEFEND THEM.YOU ARE ATYPICAL SHIA A SPINELESS COWARD LIKE IMAM ZAMAN LOL YOU.THIS PROVES YOU ARE A BIG COWARD MAY ALLAH CURSE YOU FOR YOUR SATANIC WAYS
- Referenced the quran to point out that Allah (swt) clearly states that his prophets and their followers can only be referred to as shias. By you saying something against shias is contradicting the quran, and that's a sin.
2) you claimed shimr (la) was, naozaballah, a shia.
- cited shia, sunni and credible historical narrations as sources that make unbiased comments stating that shimr (la) was an enemy of islam who was directed by yazeed (la) to kill.
@akmnawab110 ANY RAFIDI WITH BELEIFS LIKE YOURS ARE KAFIRS YOU DENY ALLAH AND ATTRIBUTE ALL THINGS TO YUR IMAMS YOU BELEIVE IF THE IMAMS SAY BE THATS WHAT IT IS YOU BELIVE IMAMS HAVE POWERS LIKE ALLAH SO I CAN BOLDLY SAY YOU ARE A MUSHRICK AND ESPECIALLY ALL YOUR SCHOLORS
@12hamida "kafir"? The oath that we take is that there is nothing worthy of worship other than ALLAH (swt). Google dua-e-kumail, dua-e-tawassul, and any other supplication of ours. We ask only Allah (swt) for everything because nothing is greater than Allah (swt).
@akmnawab110 YOU UTTER THIS OATH BUT DONT KNOW ITS TRU MENAING YOUR IMAMS ARE BETTER TO YOU THAN ALLAH IF YOU BELEIVE THIS STOP UTTERING YA ALI MADAD "ONLY CALL ALLAH DONT EVEN CALL ON PROFETS ONLY ALLAH SO WHY DOES YOUR BOOKS SAY IMAMS HAVE POWERS LIKE ALLAH
@akmnawab110 OKAY YOU HAVE TO BELEIVE IT SINCE YOU QUOTE QURAN SO MUCH LISTEN TO THIS PROOF THAT IMAM HASSAN WAS NOT INFALLIBLE HE DIVORCED 50 WOMEN AND HIS FATHER ALI RA GAVE A SERMON AND TOLD PEOPLE NOT TO MARRY DAUGHTERS TO HIM HERE IS PROOF 5/56 AL KAFI .
@akmnawab110 TWO POINTS HERE ON BOTH NOT BEING INFALLIBLE "ONE IMAM ALI RA EXPOSED HIS SONS FAULT 2 IMAM HASSAN RA DIVORCED ALOT OF WOMEN AND ALLAH SAYS HE FROWNS UPON DIVORCE THERE IS A FEW MISTAKED THEY MADE OF COURSE YOU WILL DENY HADITH AS WEAK BUT GUESS WHAT YOUR FAMOUSE IMAM MAJILISI SAYS ABOUT HADITH HE SAYS IT IS "MUWATHDALAQ" SAHIH SO DONT GO AGAINST YOUR ULEMA
@12hamida Please post up your reference so I can refute it with the quran. The trend is that I will always utilize the quran and AUTHENTIC CHAINS OF NARRATIONS WHICH WILL VALIDATE MY POINT, LIKE IT ALWAYS HAS, AGAINST YOUR RUBBISH.
3) you praised that the greatest enemies of islam, muwiya (la) & yazeed (la)
- I stated authentic sunni narrations to prove to you how the evil of both of these lanatis was cited without any biased opinions. They were enemies of Allah (swt), who wanted power. Every single citation I posted all agreed that both were the walking contradiction of the quran, aka the enemies of Islam.
- I also cited how both are descendants of the enemies in badr, uhud khandaq..wars against the Prophet.
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN BEING A SINNNER DOES NOT TAKE YOU OUT OF ISLAM DID NOT IMAM ALI ASK FOR FORGIVENESS ZAID ABELDEEN HASSAN HUSSSEIN THAT MEANS THEY MADE MISTAKES.KNOW ONE DOUBTS ABOUT YAZEED RA WRONG BUT WHO ARE WE TO TALK WRONG ABOUT SAHABA.
@12hamida You're contradicting the quran now because verse 33:33 clearly states that Allah (swt) removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (pbut). I've cited every single credible narration to prove this. Maula Ali (as), or any other member of the Ahlulbayt (pbut) could not commit a sin because the quran is irrefutable.
@12hamida furthermore, "And We ASSIGNED from among them some Imams who GUIDE by Our authority since they were patient and believed firmly in Our Signs." (Quran 32:24)
The imams (pbut) are guides for the worshipers of Allah (swt). One of the key aspects of Islam is for worshipers to seek forgiveness. The Imams (as) gave us supplications for everything (ex seeking forgiveness) to cleanse our souls.
@akmnawab110 lol YOU ARE A DESPERATE MAN THIS AYAT IS TALKING ABOUT PROFETS BETTER YET GO READE SHAI TAFSIR ON IT LOL YOU ARE A BALATANT DESPICIBLE RAFIDI TO LIE ON THE BOOK OF ALLAH LANAT ON YOU AND YOUR IMAM ZAMAN
@12hamida You state that you're not against Maula Hussain (as) or the Prophet (pbuh), but you go ahead and send lanat on their descendant whom both proclaimed the one Allah (swt) will send to restore order and save the world.
"Indeed you are a warner, and to every people there is a guide." (13:7)
Allah (swt) clearly states that there will always be an Imam to guide worshipers towards the beneficence of Allah (swt). These guides represent Islam, which is perfect. 33:33 = Ahlulbayt = Perfection
@akmnawab110 13-7 IS TALKING ABOUT PROFETS ALSO WHEN WILL YOU UNDERSTANDF YOUR SHIA CULT IS A MADE UP RELIGION A BUNCH OF GOG WASH.I KNOW I BEEN TESTING YOUR EMAN IN THIS DEBATE YOU ARE HAVING DOUBTS ABOUT YOUR CULT AND YOU ARE STILL FIGHTING IT LOL
@12hamida No, it is not only about the Prophets. Once again, your claim is baseless because Allah (swt) has said in the quran is perfect, and goes hand in hand with guidance.
@akmnawab110 you shia dont beleive in present quran your hadith clearly stipulates this. you dont beleive in sunnah you replaced it with bida.you dont beleive in unseen Allah you beleive in 12 fase gods.(ya ali ya hussein ya hassan)if the quran you claim is perfect why do you beleive in 17,000 missing verses. why you bleive hidden coward imam will bring real quran
@12hamida What makes your statement false about us, naozaballah, "not believing in the Quran", is the fact that I've been referencing the quran throughout this entire thread. Shias respect the quran more than wahabis...the same wahabis who bomb a masjid with the quran inside.
Also, that same quran tells us of Prophets & Guides, both of which I referenced earlier. I'm telling you once again that there is nothing worthy of worship other than Allah (swt).
@akmnawab110 AND IM TELLING YOU YOUR MOUTH UTTERS THIS BUT DOES NOT BELEIVE IN IT NOR UNDDERSTANDS IT.YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU BELEIVE OR SAY YOU BELEIVE IN SAY OTHERWISE YOUARE A RAFIDI AND YOU USE YOUR TAQIYAH ALL THE TIME TO PROVE NONESENSE.YOU DONT BELEIVE IN SHIA OR SUNNI HADITH LOL YOUARE A DISGRACE TO RAFIDISM
@12hamida you're making an assumption, and that is haram because it is an opinionated judgment based off of nothing credible. I've provided my word and legitimate sources, most notably the quran, that serve as solid evidence that our aqeeda is simple:
1) Nothing is worthy of Worship other than Allah (swt).
2) Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the Messenger who delivered tawheed.
@urduwale The deen is being questioned, and I have been answering with legitimate and credible proof. He's been spreading hate, and it is our jobs as Muslims to defend the religion from any impurities or attacks. I kindly request you to just let the debate go on for another week and then delete all the unnecessary comments he has posted because he has no validity (sources, references, etc) in them. Let the world see how wahabis just talk without any credibility.
@12hamida The need for a Guide is a permanent one, and there is no way that Allah (swt) would leave it to human being to choose whoever they liked as the guide for the Ummah. Such a practice has no Qur’anic basis, and is in fact in clear violation to the Sunnah of Allah (swt), and as He (swt) says: "You will not find any change in the sunnah of Allah (swt)." (Quran: 33:62)
@akmnawab110 you dont beleive in sunnah you replaced it with bida al kafi cant be sunnah it teaches kufr and shirk and to hate in al kafi it worships imams not ALLAH.you keep qouting quran is ironic because your creed goes against the book of Allah
@12hamida A narration cannot be authorized as credible unless its chain of narrators is inspected, and whether the narration is compatible with the quran. This is why everything you say against the Ahlulbayt (pbut) is false because verse 33:33 clearly represents the them, and no one else. Every hadith associated with the validity of verse 33:33 and the Ahlulbayt (pbut) has been authorized as authentic by all scholars (both sects).
@akmnawab110 YEA YEA SURE VERSE 33-33 FOR THE 100 TIME IS TAKING OUT OF CONTEXT IT IS MEANT FOR WIVES NOT ALI HASSAN HUSSEIN FATIMA ONLY RA) BUT IF THAT IS WHAT YOU BELEIVE IT IS FINE NO PROBLEM.JUST REMEMBER HELL IS HOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
@12hamida you haven't once provided a single hadith or legitimate source to prove your baseless claim. I have provided numerous strong narrations that prove verse 33:33 is only about the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Your claim of verse 33:33 being about the wives is absolutely preposterous because it contradicts with verses 33:29, 33:30 & 33:31 and authentic hadiths.
@12hamida In Sahih Muslim, there is a chapter named "Chapter of Virtues of the Companions". Inside this chapter, there is a section called "Section of the Virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet". There exists ONLY ONE tradition in this section, and this tradition has no reference to the wives of the Prophet (PBUH&HF). The tradition is known as "The Tradition of Cloak/Mantle" (Hadith al-Kisaa)
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.
Aisha (la) herself narrates that the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) clearly identifies the verse 33:33 to be only for him, Bibi Fatima (sa), Maula Ali (as), Maula Hassan (as) & Maula Hussain (as).
This is a fact, and you can google search it within seconds to confirm.
@akmnawab110 BESIDES ANY HADITH I POST FROM SHIA SOURCE YOU DENY THEM FAST CANT YOU CANT DEFEND IT AND SAY IT IS WEAK.SO I HAVE REFUTED ALL YOUR BASELESS CLAIMS
@12hamida collectively, you've only posted up six "references"...I refuted all six with credible evidence. Two of them were lies and had nothing to do with the sermons found in Nahjul Balagah, and the other four were beyond weak in its credibility due to the narrators.
@12hamida Again, "O' Consorts of the Prophet! if any of you were guilty of evident misconduct conduct the Punishment would be doubled to her and that is easy for Allah." - 33:30
Sahih Bukhari, and other sunni sources pretty much expose aisha (la) and hafsa (la) as perpetrators of the Prophet. I've posted all of the sources in previous posts so there is absolutely no way that someone who possess impurities such as jealously, anger, etc. to be considered within the context of 33:33
@akmnawab110 I PROVIDED YOU PROOF THAT FATIMA RA WAS ALSO JEALOUS SO IS THAT A INFALLIBLE TRAIT AND ALI RA USED TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS IS THAT INFALLIBLE TRAIT.ALI RA GAVE BAYIAH TO ABU BAKR RA ACCORDING TO YOU HE IS A KAFIR LOL SO IS THAT INFALLIBLE
@12hamida that "proof" did not prove your point. You clearly cannot interpret the english language, or else you would realize that the tone of that specific reference does not question the purity of any member of the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Furthermore, it contradicts your own purpose. Anyone who is not possessed with hatred (for which is clouding your judgment) will agree with me.
@12hamida Again, there are numerous citations that are credible in source/narrations from both sects that prove the Ahlulbayt to be free of impurities. I've posted most of them here, but its obvious that you do not read them. Besides that, its quite obvious that you're main purpose is to hide the truth, hence why you spam this video with the same baseless accusations just so the proof will be pushed to another page. I'm sure @urduwale will notice this and delete your spam.
@12hamida The reason why there would not be any change in the sunnah of Allah, especially with this practice, is the continued need that human beings have towards guidance. A living, present guide is always demanded, and such a person is Imam al-Mahdi (as).
@akmnawab110 we beleive in different imams OURS IS NOT IN OCCULATION HIDING FORM SOME BIG GOVERNMENT OUT FOR HIM. OURS WILL HAVE A NATURAL BIRTH SAME NAME AS RASSOL HE IS NOT A ECONOMICAL TOOL FOR AYOOUTULLAHS TO GET GIRLS AND GET PAID MILLIONS IN NAME OF KHUMS
@akmnawab110 WE WILL SEE WHEN ALLAH PLACES 12 IMAMS IN FRONT OF YOU AND SAY WORSHIP THEM NOW.? WHAT WILL YOUR EXCUSE BE ON THAT DAY ALLAH WILLR REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU USED TO SAY.IM DONE WITH YOU THIS IS GETTING OLDD YOU CAN LEAD A HORSE TO WATER BUT CANT MAKE HIM DRINK
@12hamida Excuse? I've proven time and time again with credible proof our belief is there is nothing worthy of worship other than Allah (Swt). What's quite odd is that you haven't provided a single bit of sources to back up your ridiculous and baseless claims.
@akmnawab110 OKAY NO PROBLEM (SURAH 9-31 REMINDS ME OF THE SHIA )THEY TAKE THERE RABBIS AND MONKS FOR GODS BESIDES ALLAH )EVEN CHRISTIANS AND JEWS UTTER YOUR WORDS BUT DO THEYREALLY BELEIVE NO YOUR CREED IS LIKE THERES NO DIFFFERENCE
33:33 states "o people of the house....", so it cannot mean "books". Also, in the verses before this, it clearly states that those cohorts (wives) who commit sin will be punished double. I referenced countless sunni sources (ex: sahih) to prove that the evidence is unbiased against aisha (la) and hafsa (la).
@12hamida "We will raise up a witness in every people, drawn from amongst themselves. And we shall bring thee as witnesses against these people. We have revealed to you [Prophet Muhammad] the Book which explains all things, guidance, a mercy, and good news to all the Muslims. (16:89)
Note here that Allah (swt) is not using the past tense, but is rather using the present tense (mudaria’). Now, the present tense can also be used to mean the future tense as well.
@akmnawab110 MAN ARE YOU SERIOUS? CAN YUOU COMPREHEND ENGLISH ?THIS AYAT IS A PROOF AGAINST YOUR FASE CLAIM NOT HELPING YOU THIS MEANS JUDGEMENT DAY WHEN WE FACE ALLAH FOR OUR DEEDS.12 IMAMS ARE NOT IN QURAN NO WHERE STOP YOUR LYING YOUR KAFIR SCHOLORS ARE MISLEADING YOU AND YOU ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH TO SEE THAT
@akmnawab110 once again your imams are not infallible only ALLAH IS.THEY WERE INFALLIBLE IN TAWHEED ONLY DID NOT COMMIT THE SHIRK YU PROPAGATE THERE AQEEDA IS DIFFERENT FROM YOURS.EVEN IMAM ZAMAN (LA)IS NOT INFALLIBLE CAUSE HE IS AFRAID TO GO IN BATTLEFIELD IT STATES IN SHIA BOOKS
@12hamida "Imam-e-zamana" literally means "IMAM OF OUR TIME". Allah (swt) states in the quran: "One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)
The quran is not just a book about the past, but serves as a guide for all time. In this verse, Allah (swt) clearly claims that he will call all people with their Imam (guide). When you associate such vile, disrespectful and disgusting comments with our Imam, you contradict Allah's (swt) command.
@12hamida Once again, it is simple to understand that verse 33:33 means removing all sins from the house because they will reflect the perfection of Allah (swt) and the Quran by guiding (Allah's) creations towards the religion of Islam. If anyone associates themselves with sins, how will they be capable of leading with credibility? This is why you will never find any impurities associated with the Ahlulbayt (pbut). They are a reflection of Allah (swt), so do not disrespect them.
@12hamida Again, credible narrations from both shias and sunni sources have cited that 33:33 is about the Ahlulbayt (pbut). They are free from impurities because they reflect the religion of Islam (perfection).
@12hamida "One day Allah will raise up a witness from every people, and then no excuse will be accepted from the unbelievers." (16:84)
"One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)
These verses establish that all times and all places there is, in some form or another, a blessed individual who receives guidance directly from Allah (swt). Allah (swt) Himself who will appoint this guide and witness to every people.
@12hamida Excuse me, but the "tafsir" you have reference is legitimately weak. All hadith have to be taking into context with the quran, and that is why the "hadith" you post against the Ahlulbayt (pbut) will always be weak. The quran clearly states in verse 33:33 that Allah (swt) has removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Aisha (la) even narrated that this, and many authentic hadeeth agreed on the association.
@12hamida It took me a day to research your sources.
1) sharh nahj il-balaagha was written by ibne abi 'I-hadid who was a sunni mu'tazili. This book is not used by any shia scholar because of the weak chains of narrations.
2) There's no book called "ihejaz"..you can check google to confirm this.
@akmnawab110 LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL WOW ARE YOU EVEN A SHIA ? MAN YOUR TAQIYAH IS TERRIBLE PEOPLE CAN SEE RIGHT THREW IT .SO NOW NAHAL BALAGA IS A FASE SUNNI BOOK LOL WOW THE SHAI LAYMEN ARE MORE KNOWLDGEABLE THAN SCHOLORS SO YOU KNOW MORE THAN RAFIDI SCHOLORS LOL LMAO THE LESS YOU TALK THE MORE INTELLIGENT YOU SOUND IM DONE WITH YOU I HAD FUN.INSHALLA YOU BECOME MUSLIM AND WHAT EVER I SAID I APOLOGIZE TO YOU FOR ANY OFFENSIVE REMARKS MAY ALLAH FORGIVE ME AND YOU .
@12hamida no, the book you were referring to is "Sharh nahj 'l-balaagah" which was written by ibn abi 'l-hadid, a sunni mutazili. The Real Nahjul Balagah is written by Maula Ali (as). This is why I can confidently say the book you referenced is not credible, let alone used by any shia scholars. This makes your argument beyond baseless.
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61. - aisha (la) narrates herself that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) stated: the Prophet recited: "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33)."
@akmnawab110 16-84 is talking about profets for there nations on judement day.not shia gods (12imams)17-71 is talking about imams not shia gods there is not one single verse that talks about 12 imams in quran you despicible liar.
@12hamida This person that Allah (swt) is speaking about is not somebody elected by the Muslims in anyway shape or form, and This person that Allah (swt) is speaking about is not somebody elected by the Muslims in anyway shape or form, and the Muslims (or anybody else in the cosmos) have absolutely no input on who this person is to going to be.
@12hamida 4) You stated that, naozaballah, Maula Hussain (as) should've never gone to karbala.
- I posted the quranic ayats that justified Maula's (as) purpose to go to karbala was to defend Islam from the tyrant yazeed (la). yazeed (la), a walking contradiction of the quran, demanded the the Prophet's grandson authorize his rule or else he would be slaughtered. Maula Hussain (as) knew islam would cease to exist if he gave bayat to yazeed (la), hence the journey to defend islam in karbala.
@akmnawab110 NO WHERE IN QURAN DOES ALLAH TALK ABOUT HUSSEIN STOP YOUR WAR ON THE QURAN PLEASE .HE WENT AGAINST THE SHURA COUNSEL LISTEN TO HOW STUPID YOU SOUND HE WENT THERE TO SAVE ISLAM LOL SO ALLAH IS THAT WEAK.THAT HE CANT PROTECT HIS RELIGION .USE COMMON SENSE
@12hamida I quoted this below, but you obviously did not care to read or reference it because you're an enemy of islam who rejects the quran (Allah's words).
"Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness." (25:52)
Everything historical narration about yazeed (la) confirms the fact that he was a walking contradiction of Allah (swt). His intent was to destroy islam with bayat, hence why Imam Hussain went against him based on the QURAN.
5) You stated that, naozaballah, umar (la) was granted successorship.
- Once again, I utilized strong sunni narrations (all credible in their chains) that state Maula Ali (as) as being appointed the successor at ghadir. More so, even abu bakr (la) and umar (la) themselves declared it. Not only did I cite bukhari, but I cited the books written by prominent sunni scholars praised by the wahabi ideology in saudi.
@akmnawab110 LOL OH YEA RIGHT AT A REST STOP SO INSTEAD OF ALI RA OBEYING THE PEOFET HE BOWED DOWNLIKE A COWARD AND GAVE LEADERSHIP TO ABU BAKR RA.SHIA ACCOUNTS OF GUIDER KHUMS IS A EXAGGERRATED STORY.SO ALI RA GAVE ALLEGIENCE TO A KAFIRWHEN YOUR OWN BOOKS SAY IT IS HARAM.STOP INSULTING ALI RA OF COWARDICE HE WAS THE ONE OF THE BRAVEST MEN IN ISLAM.MAWLA DOES NOT MEAN SUCESSOR RAFIDI
@12hamida Once again, what refutes your comment is the fact that all authentic narrations with strong chains cite Maula Ali (as) as the rightful successor because the sanctity of the perfect religion (islam) would only be safe in the care of someone perfect (Ahlulbayt). After all, they are guides.
NEVER DID MAULA ALI (AS) GIVE BAYAT TO abu bakr. You only talk about this, but you never once bought any credible reference to it because it doesn't exist.
@12hamida Ok, here's the answer to your challenge:
1) Grand Mufti of Saudi states that yazeed (la) was justified in killing the Prophet's grandson.
2) zakir naik stated in a Confrence in Mumbai that karbala was, nazubillah, a "political war", and he designated yazeed (la) with praises.
These "scholars" clearly defend the tyrant who wanted to destroy islam!
akmnawab110 1 month ago
@akmnawab110 SO OU GOT MORE SENSE THAN THE ULEMA LOL HOW ABOUT YOUR SCHOLORS WHO SAY SEX CHANGES ARE OKAY HOMOSEXUALITY IS FINE PROSTITUTION IS OK GO LOOK IN THE MIRRIOR
12hamida 1 month ago
@akmnawab110 you still have not provided evidence yazeed ra ordered killing of hussein rad you just found out a follower of ali rad killed hussein
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida I have provided you numerous evidence to prove the fact that yazeed (la) was responsible for the murder of Maula Hussain (as). Just click "see all comments" located on the bottom right of this page to see the posts that you continue to deny.
Also, how can you associate the term "ra" with someone as evil as yazeed (la)? Once again, I've provided you numerous historical contexts from shia & sunni historians that prove yazeed (la) to be an enemy of islam.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida
Sibt Ibn Jauzi in his Tadhkira, page 63, says that some of the people of Medina went to Syria in 62 A.H. When they learned of the sinful deeds of Yazid, they returned to Medina, broke their allegiance to him, cursed him, and turned out his Governor, Uthman Bin Abi Sufyan.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida "Abdullah Bin Hanzala (Ghusilu'l-Mala'ikat) said: "O people, we did not revolt against Yazid until we verified that he was an irreligious man. He killed the descendants of the Prophet, illegally associates with mothers, daughters, and sisters, drinks wine, and does not offer the ritual prayer."
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Ibn Kathir records that Ibn Ziyad wrote to Umar Ibn Sa`d:
“Become obstacle between Hussain and water, treat them in the way Ameer al Momineen Uthman was treated and ask him and his companions to give bayah to Ameer al Momineen Yazid bin Muawiyah”
al Bidayah wal Nihayah (Urdu) Volume 8 page 1058
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 we dont accept shia sources sorry not muslim
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
So you don't accept any sources that are related to the Prophets of Allah, such as the quraan.
Once again, you contradict yourself.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12hamida
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
So you don't accept any sources that are related to the Prophets of Allah, such as the quraan.
Once again, you contradict yourself.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12hamida
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
So you don't accept any sources that are related to the Prophets of Allah, such as the quraan.
Once again, you contradict yourself.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
So you don't accept any sources that are related to the Prophets of Allah, such as the quraan.
Once again, you contradict yourself.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida So you don't accept "shia sources"? Once again, Allah (swt) himself noted in the quraan that the term "shia" is associated with those who are his followers. By you saying anything derogatory against shias, you are insulting Allah's (swt) followers, and that is a sin. Again, you contradict the quraan (Allah's words). Here is the exact words from the quran, no "context" needed:
"And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 AND ONCCE AGAIN SHIA DDOES NOT MEAN THE SHIA OF ALI RA YOU ARE MISINTERPERTING QURAN THAT IS MY ISSUE WITH YOU READ TAFISIR STOP TRANSLATING QURAN BY YOUR DESIRES
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Do you think Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) can lie, or say anything against Allah's (Swt) own words? The Prophet (pbuh) is cited as saying: "O Ali! On the Day of Judgment I shall resort to Allah and you will resort to me and your children will resort to you and the Shia will resort to them. Then you will see where they carry us. (i.e. to Paradise)" - Sunni reference: Rabi al-Abrar, by al-Zamakhshari
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 youare a liar i know that when did i show malice against hussein ra you shia even beleive allah lies i can showe you proof okay what is your point about these hadith show me one that yazeed ra killed hussein
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida You 're contradicting yourself again, and this is clearly evident to everyone when they click "see all comments' because you have gone out of your way to negate Maula Hussain's (as) journey to save islam at karbala on more than one occasion.
Once again, I've showed you countless citations identifying yazeed (la) as the amir (la) of shimr (la), ibne ziyad (la), and the over-all mastermind behind the murder of the Prophet's Grandson. Click "see all comments".
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 these comments you post are not justified in your fabricated lies you keep posting typical rafidi
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida
Ibn Asakir records (in Mishbaath ba Sunnath page 219) a hadith on the authority Hadhrath Ayesha: "Oh Allah never shower your blessings on the cursed, killer Yazeed, he will rebel against my beloved Husayn and martyr him"
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@12hamida Ibn Katheer in Al Bidayah Volume 8 page 222 stated:
" We have already mentioned that he had Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (s) Husayn and his companions. In those three days in Madina, it is difficult to mention the type of acts that were carried out. By doing this act Yazeed wanted to secure his governance, in the same way Allah (swt) broke the neck of every Pharoah, the true King (swt) also broke the neck of Yazeed.’"
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@12hamida Ahmed Bin Daud Abu Hanifa Dinawari records the statement of Ibn Ziyad:
“I killed Al Hussain due to the reason that he revolted against our Imam [Yazid] and the very Imam[Yazid] sent me the message to kill Al Hussain. Now if the murder of Hussain is a sin then Yazid is responsible for it”
Akhbaar Tawaal, page 279 (Egypt) by Ahmed Bin Daud Abu Hanifa Dinwari
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida “I killed Al Hussain on the orders of Yazid to kill him otherwise he would kill me therefore I chose to kill Hussain” - ibne ziyad
Tareekh Kamil, Volume 4 page 55 (Egypt)
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 here is somtething for you to choke on if you dont wanna beleive me listen to your despicible anal sex allowing ulema in this video look upo on youutbe(WHO KILLED IMAM HUSSEIN A SHIA IRANIAN PERSIAN KILLED AHAL BAIT &HUSSEN. YOUR SHIA IMAMS PROVE YOU RAFIDI KILLED HUSSEIN HASSAN ALI
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Once again, please refer to all of the previous comments I have made which answer your repeated baseless claims. Everything you claim is easily refuted based on the fact that it contradicts simple logic and the quraan.
1) the Quraan, which is Allah's (swt) own words, mentions on multiple occasions that the term "shia" is to be used to refer to FOLLOWERS OF ALLAH (SWT). Our Prophets (pbut), and their followers, were referred to as "Shia" in the quran.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 YOU ONCE AGAIN ARE TAKING QURAN AND HADITH OUT OF CONTEXT TYPICAL SHIA TACTIC HOW DO YOU QUOTE BUKHARI WHEN SHIA DONT BELEIVE IN BUKHARI LOL ACCORDING TO YOU RAFIDI ALL OF SUNNI ARE KAFIRS YOURCLAIMS ARE CONTRADICTORY
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Shias refer to Bukhari, a sunni source, because it 100% authenticates the justification of the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Remember something, Allah (swt) sent down four books, Zuraat, injeel (bible), torat (torah) & the Quran. Before the quran's revelation, the former three were sent by Allah (swt) to promote the laws of Islam, but were corrupted. Even though those three were corrupted, we still consider them holy. This is the same with bukhari.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 LOL OH REALLY DAMN WHAT A RAFIDI CONTRADICTION SO NOW YOU SAY BUKHARI IS HOLY THATS FUNNY BECAUSE ALL YOUR SCHOLORS SAY ALL HADITH IN THERE ARE WRITTEN BY APOSTATES AND KAFIRS LOOKI ON YOU TUBE SHIA RAFIDI ALL SAY BUKHARI IS BOOKS BY SUNNI KAFIRS YOUU SOUND SO CONFUSED
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida When Allah (swt) himself has claimed that Shias are followers, how dare you, or any other wahabi contradicts Allah (Swt) and say that shias are responsible for the murder of the personality who died protecting islam? Obviously, there is a contradiction in your reference of term, especially since Shias mourn Imam Hussain's (as) sacrifice because his martyrdom at the hands of yazeed (la) lead an enlightenment amongst the world that re energized the sole worship of Allah (Swt) & his will.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 YOU RAFIDI MOURN HUSSEIN RA DEATH CAUSE OIF THE GUILT OF BETRAYING HIM EVEN ALI RA KNEW YOU RAFIDI WHERE BACKSTABBERS YOU ARE TAKING TERM IN SHIA OUT OF CONTEXT HOW BOUT WHEN ALLAH SAYS DONT BE SHIA IN QURAN 6-159 LOL HE DID NOT DIE PROTECTING ISLAM HE HUSSEIN RA WENT AGAINST ADVICE OF SHURA AND MADE A MISTAKE AND WAS WARNED THATS WHERE SHIMAR THE SHIA KILLED HIM DID YOU LOK AT YOUTUBE SIGHT I SENT YOU YOUR OWN SCHOLORS ADMIT SHIA KILLED HUSSEIN RA
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida once again, the common wahabi (la) propaganda is to destroy islam by spreading false statements/rumors based on ignorance and pure hatred for the Prophet (pbuh) and his family.
Just look at the previous comments, I used authentic citations that identify yazeed ibne muwaiya (la) as the absolute enemy of islam, yet you continue to refer to him as someone who deserves praise
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 WHAT THE PROPAGANDA THAT IS IN YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU KEEP POINTING OUT YAZEED RA WAS ADRUNK AND ETC IS IRRELEVANT TO ME A SINNER IS NOT TALKING OUT OF FOLD OF ISLAM DID HE DO BAD THINGS OF COURSE I AGREE BUT MY POINT IS THE RAFIDI STILL BETRAYED HUSSEIN RA YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES HE ORDERED KILLING
12hamida 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"@akmnawab110 WHAT THE PROPAGANDA THAT IS IN YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU KEEP POINTING OUT YAZEED RA WAS ADRUNK AND ETC IS IRRELEVANT TO ME A SINNER IS NOT TALKING OUT OF FOLD OF ISLAM DID HE DO BAD THINGS OF COURSE I AGREE BUT MY POINT IS THE RAFIDI STILL BETRAYED HUSSEIN RA YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES HE ORDERED KILLING
12hamida 6 hours ago"
even more contradictions. You basically admit that yazeed (la) was a despot, sinner, and murderer of Imam Hussain (as), but you associate RA?
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida what's worse is, you praise yazeed (la) even after you admit that he killed the Prophet's (pbuh) grandson, but then you continue to make baseless claims that "shias" were responsible for the killing.
EVEN MORE CONTRADICTIONS FROM YOU.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 you are a despicible liar show me one time i admitted yazeed killed hussein i said shiamar the shia killed hussein ra is your taqiyah kicking in now our deceit
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida "betraying"? Maula Ali (as) wrote in Nahjul Balagha, Letter 10 to muwaiya (la),
"you have challenged me to a battle. I accept your challenge, but I have a proposal to make....Let us, you and I have a single combat. Let it be a combat unto death...Let the world see and realize who is the sinner and who has forgotten Allah (swt) and the day of judgement. Will you accept this invitation of mine?..Are you a man to face death boldy and bravely, or are you merely a vampire"
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Once again, Maula Ali (as) wrote in Nahjul Balagha, Letter 10 to muwaiya (la), the father of yazeed (la),:
"Remember mu'awiya (la)! Though I am old, I am still Abul Hasan (as), the man who killed your maternal grandfather, your uncle and your brother in single combats in the battle of badr.."
Once again, you contradict yourself when you attack Shias (Allah's followers) with baseless claims such as "betraying imams". Maula Ali (as) clearly identifies muwaiya (la) as an enemy of islam.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 ANYTGHING WRITTTEN IN SHIA BOOKS HOLD NO WIEGHT THE CHAIN OF NARRATORS IN SHIA BOOKS ARE MISTERIOUS EVEN SHIA ADMITY TO THIS FABRICATED HADITH ETC
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Read Najhul Balagah's letters 9 and 10, Maula Ali (as) identifies yazeed's (la) progeny, specifically his father mauwiya (la) as enemies of Islam. Not one shia associates him/herself with muwiya (la) or his yazeed (la) because they were enemies of islam. You, on the other hand, have praised mawiya (la) and yazeed (la). This clearly shows how you are an enemy of islam.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 IT IS YOUR CREED TO BASH DOES PEOPLE AND OTHERS TO JUSTIFY YOUR CULT WITHOUT CURSING SAHABA THE SHAI HAVE NO DEEN TO JSUTIFY NOR A LEG TO STAND ON THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING RA AFTER THERE NAMES MAY ALLAH FORGIVE THEM FOR THERE SINS AND BLESS THEM WITH PARADISE
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Here is what the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) about his family:
"Al-Hasan and al-Husain are the chiefs of
the youth of Paradise and Fatimah is the chief of their women."
Sunni references:
(1) Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p660, on the authority of Abu Sa'id and Hudhayfa
(2) Sunan Ibn Majah, Introduction 8
(3) al-Tabarani, on the authorities of: Umar, Ali, Jabir, Abu Hurayrah,
Usamah Ibn Zaid, al-Baraa, Ibn 'Adi, and Ibn Masud.
(4) al-Kubra, by al-Nisa'i
even more available...........
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 okay what is the point i send dua on ahla bait the love we have is true the shia love is a smoke screen from the truth
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida I have provided authentic citations that identify umar (la) and abu bakr (la) as the culprits who murdered Bibi Fatima binte Mustafa (sa). This is the same Bibi Fatima (sa) that the Prophet of Islam labeled "The Chief of All Women".
How can you associate something as prestigious as (ra) to anyone who has been cited in every text to commit murder against members of the Prophet's family? This is the same family Allah (swt) has honored in the quran!
shame on you.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 MAY ALLAH CURSE BE ON THE LIARS SUCH AS YOU MORE FABRICATED LIES BY THE RAFIDI NO ONE IS BUYING
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida Why did Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) go to badr and uhud then? Whenever you wahabis attack the legitimacy of Maula Hussain's (as) journey to save Islam in karbala, the quran contradicts your baseless statement. Why did Prophet Ibrahim prepare to sacrifice Hz. Ismail? The "shura" would've gone against that too, but it was revealed to Ibahim by Allah (swt), so he and Hz. Ismail proceeded to do it because if Hz. Ibrahim did not, he would go against the revelation of sacrifice in Islam.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN YOU CANNOT COMAPARE HUSSEIN RA TO RASSOL OR IBRAHIM AS HUSSEIN RA MADE A MISTAKE ADMIT IT YOU CANT CAUSE IF YOU DO HIS INFALLIBILITY HAS NO CREDIT
12hamida 2 weeks ago
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@12hamida The ayat solidifying the Ahlulbayt's (pbut) infallibility (Quran verse 33:33) states that, "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul- Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification"
The reason why they (pbut) were granted infallibility is because they represent the perfect religion. yazeed's (la) main purpose was to destroy islam, hence why he demanded bayat. Maula Hussain would never allow yazeed (la). to imperfect Islam.
akmnawab110 2 weeks ago
@akmnawab110 THIS AYAT IS ABOUT THE WIVES OF PROFET NOT ALI HUSSEIN OR ALI OR FATIMA LIAR READ THE VERSE CORRECTLY IT IS IRONIC BOTH TIMES ALLAH MENTIONS AHLA BAIT IT IS ABOUT A WOMEN LOL MAY ALLOAH CURSE YOUR CULT
12hamida 2 weeks ago
@12hamida I've answered your baseless claim about this in previous posts. "verily Allah has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward" - (33:29) If all the Prophet's wives were well-dowers, then there was no need for Allah to say this. Allah would have said, "all of you will receive a great reward".
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 it is clear from your statements your islamic knowledge is not there this ayat is a ordr from allah this ayat is reffered to as a ayat of ethics to wives it has nothing to do with ali hussein hassan fatima RA where do you majicians come up with these stories lol may allah curse be on the liars
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida your replies are as baseless as your claims. The ayat from the quran clearly states that not all wives of the Prophet are the same, and those who participate in misconduct will be severely punished. In Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5 Tradition 166, Aisha herself narrates how she was jealous. In Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 155, Aisha states that she frequently angered the Prophet (pbuh). Anger & Jealousy, two things not associated with someone who is infallible.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 ALLAH USED THIS PATTERN OF SPEECH TO ADDRESS MANY PEOPLE CONSIDER THESE AYATS( 8:11)(9:103)(5:6)VERSE 33:33 WAS NOT MEANT TO MAKE ANYONE INFALLIBLE BUT RATHER SIMPLY EXPIATE THEM FOR PAST MISTAKES AND ERRORS THIS IS YOUR DIFFICULITY RAFIDI THE QURAN IS A WTINESS AGAINST YOUR FALSE IDEOLOGY
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida Once again, you are wrong. ayat 33:33 clearly states:
"Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul- Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification"
The KEYWORDS are "EVERY KIND OF UNCLEANNESS". If someone were to commit a sin in the past, that would mean that until the day of judgment they are still unclean, and that is a taint on their iman. The Ahlulbayt (pbut) were clean from the very beginning.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@12hamida cleansing has degrees and is of different types. If ones hand and face become dirty, and then if he washes them with soap and warm water they will become cleansed. Verse (5:6) also tells us by ablution one can become cleansed. If somebody argues that the degree of cleansing with ablution is not any more than cleansing the hands and face with soap, then what will be your answer to him? You will tell him that ablution make different type of cleansing than of washing the body by soap.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 AND EVEN SO THE WIVES ARE PART OF AHLA BAIT SO THIS IS YOUR DIFFICULITY THIS AYAT ONCE AGAIN IS A COMMANDMENT FORM ALLAH SWT TO THE WIVES TO ACT IN CERTAIN MANNER YOU CONTRADICT YOUR SELF EVERYTIME YOU TALK YOUR HATRED FOR ISLAM DOES THIS TOO YOU YOU WILL NOT SUCSEED IN DESTRYOING THE DEEN YOU RAFIDI TROLL LOL YOU RAFIDI THE QURAN IS A WITHNESS TO YOUR FILTH
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida once again, you display your other ignorance and hatred.
1) The Ahlulbayt (pbut) refers to PERFECTION! Allah (Swt) stated that he has removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (33.33)
2) aisha (la) and hafsa (la) cannot be considered within the Ahlulbayt because verse 33:30 clearly states that the WIVES of the Prophet who participate in misconduct will be punished (sin), which means they're not perfect.
3) I posted sunni references of Aisha & hafsa's misconduct below.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 once again THERE WAS NO MISCONDUCT THAT YOU JKEEP PROCLAIMING SHIA BARK THSI RHETORIC ALLL THE TIME YOUR HATRED FOR ISLAM MAKES YOU DO THIS. SO THE PROFET IS BURIED WHERE A EVIL PERSON LIVED AT LOL LISTEN TO YOUR SELF MAY ALLAH MAKE YU MUSLIM RAFIDI
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida In Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5 Tradition 166, Ayesha herself narrates:
"I did not feel jealous of any of the wives of the Prophet as much as I did of Khadija though I did not see her, but the Prophet used to mention her very often, and whenever he slaughtered a sheep, he would cut its parts & send them to the women friends of Khadija. When I sometimes said to him, "(You treat Khadija in such a way) as if there is no woman on earth except Khadija,"
Jealousy is not a sign of infallibility
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 IN SAHIH BUKHAR VOL 7 BOOK #62 HADITH 157
NARRATES
I HEARD ALLAH APOSTLE ON PULPIT SAYING BANU HASIM BIN MUGHIRA HAVE REQUESTED ME TO ALLOW THEM TO MARRY DAUGHTERS TO ALI IBN TALIB BUT I DONT GIVE PERMISSION UNLESS ALI RAD DIVORCES MY DAUGHTERS IN ORDER TO MARRY THERE DAUGHTERS ,BECAUSE FATIMA IS A PART OF MY BODY AND I HATE WAHT SHE HATES TO SEE AND WHAT HURTS HER HURTS ME
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida Thank you for quoting Volume 7, Book 62, Number 157: because it proved two things:
1) Anyone who hurts Bibi Fatima (sa) hurts Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)...And whomever hurts Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), hurts Allah (swt).
The following sunni resources identify umar (la) and abu bakr (la) hurting Bibi Fatima (sa) physically & emotionally:
- History of Tabari (Arabic), v1, pp 1118-1120
- History of Ibn Athir, v2, p325
- al-Isti'ab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, v3, p975
- and many more......
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 SO ALI DID HURT ALLAH AND MUH ACCORDING TO YOUR FABRICATED SOURCES HE DID NOT HURT HER BUT DID NOT MIND WATCHING HER GET HURT LOL CLEAR CONTRADICTION YOUR DEBATING SKILLS ARE TERRIBLE.ALI HURT FATIMA EMOTIOONALLY HE WANTED TO MARRY ABU JAHLS DAUGHTER IT IS IN SHIA BOOKS ALSO
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida I just refuted your absurd claims with legitimacy. Everything you've posted so far has just worked against you. lol. You've contradicted yourself, again. I'll be back later in the day to laugh at your hatred and ignorance. Until then, I dare you to be a man and read all the proof I've provided you.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 you are dellusional person i think zanjeer has got to yur head and mentally messed you up why do you beleive sunni hadith and not shai hadith refutying shia is simple you shai dont have tawhid only shirk
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida The following authentic Sunni sources confirm that verse 33:33 was in reference to Maula Ali (as):
-Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.
-al-Mustadrak by al-Hakim, Chapter of "Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, p148.
-Talkhis of al-Mustadrak, by al-Dhahabi, v3, p148
-Usdul Ghabah, by Ibn al-Athir, v3, p33
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@12hamida Its absolutely absurd of you to make such an ignorant claim. The quran clearly states that Allah (swt) has removed all impurities from Maula Ali (as). This is widely accepted by all strong narrations from shias & sunnis. If anything contradicts the quran then its clearly false, and this irrational statement of yours that, naozabillah, Maula hurt Allah (swt), is in clear contradiction of verse 33:33, which is impossible since the quran is absolutely perfect.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 once again shia do not beleive quran is perfect your scholors admit this you are a delliusional person that well lie at all cost to get point across it is know where sunni beleive ali ra was kalipahte after rassol i can give you references from shia books that beleive quran not perfect you are a liar taqiyah is being used but not working
12hamida 6 days ago
@12hamida Not one scholar from the shia fiqh denies the perfection of the quran. Just like the masoomeen, the quran is infallible; Hence, the reason why shias like me reference it to refute wahabi rhetoric like yours.
If you have any references, post them because I will guarantee that I will prove them false just like i've done for everything else you've posted up.
akmnawab110 6 days ago
@12hamida the second thing Volume 7, Book 62, Number 157 provides is:
2) exposing your utter ignorance.
- This narration serves as a hypothetical, and not as something of a fact. If hatred for Allah (swt) wasn't clouding your judgment, you would realize the context of this narration is based on an "IF"..All it does is provides the superiority of Bibi Fatima (sa), and warns of the consequences faced by people who hurt her (ex umar & abu bakr).
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 EXACTLY THE PROFET WARNED HIM HIS INTENTION WAS CLEAR HE WAS GOING TO MARRY HER UNTIL HE WAS STOPPED BY PROFET SO YOUR CLAIM IS BASELESS ALI DI HURT PROFET AND FATIMA IN THIS INCIDENT AND OTHERS ALSO ACCORDING TO SHIA BOOKS YOUR HATRRED FOR RASSOL IS EVEIDENT
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida I've refuted every absurd comment of yours with legitimacy. Take a look. I'm giving you 12 hours to answer my recent posts with something credible.
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 i have refuted you in all possible means it is hard to get threw to a person who does not even beleive in his own hadith and lies on quran every shia hadith is against your creed why have you not commented on sermons from imam ali in nahal balaga i see you stayed silent about that lol U CANT HANDLE THE THRUTH
12hamida 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 hey rafidi these things you come up with i found all on shia web sites lol COME ON DO BETTER OF COURSE THEY WILL FABRICATE AND LIE I HAVE REFUTED ALL YOUR COMMENTS DEFEND THE SERMONS OF ALI NOT BEING INFFALLIBLE AND MAKING MISTAKES
12hamida 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 those references you cite are not credible due to fact shia only cut certain text of books and not all of books message you know similiar like what you rafidi do to quran so your 12 hours have been cut to 2 seconds all your references are on shia web sites that promote lies and hatrred for deen of islam show me the whole book then we can debate those things
12hamida 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 it is funny you have not mentioned nothing about sermon of ali rad claiming he made mistakes proving he is not infallible lol THEN YOU BACK TRACK AND ALL OF SUDDEN SAY FATIMA RA IS NOT INFALLIBLE LOL MAKE UP YOUR MIND RAFIDI YOU ARE CONSTANTLY CONTRADICTING YOURSELF YOU EVEN DENY YOUR SOURCES
12hamida 1 week ago
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #6
In this narration, aisha (la) clearly states that the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) clearly stated that he, along with Maula Ali (as), Bibi Fatima (sa) and Maula Hassan (as) & Hussain (as) are those who verse 33:33 refers to, hence they are free from sin.
Your claim is in clear contradiction of Allah
akmnawab110 1 week ago
@akmnawab110 okay and what is your point i beleive that but free from sin of what you say and i say are different WE BELEIVE THEY ARE FREE FROM SHIRK IN THERE BELIEIF WHILE SHAI HAVE TWISTED CONCEPT WHY HAVE YOU NOT ANSEARED ABOUT SERMON 216 OF IMAM ALI RA IN NAHAL BALAGA HE ADMITS HE MAKES MISTAKES AND IS NOT PERFECT LOL THAT HUSHES YOU UP FAST I SEE CAUSE YOUR BOOKS CONTRADICT YOUR STATEMENT
12hamida 6 days ago
@12hamida As Allah (swt) as my witness, and he being the only one worthy of worship, I have the Nahjul Balagah in front of me. I opened it to the sermon you have referenced, Sermon 216, and in this short paragraph Maula Ali (as) discusses nothing of what you have said. You are clearly lying, and Allah's (swt) lanat is on you for lying!
akmnawab110 6 days ago
@akmnawab110 lol NNY BECAUSE I HAVE IT TOO LETS CHALLENGE ALL WHO HAVE IT TO OPEN IT UP AND READ IT FOR A CHANGE IT IS CLEAR YOU CANT REFUTE IT AND DENY IT SO YOUR CLAIM IS IT IS NOT THERE YOU ARE DESPICIBLE YOU ARE RIGHT ALLAH SAYS LANAT ON THE LIARS YOU
12hamida 5 days ago
@12hamida FINE, NO PROBLEM WITH THAT BECAUSE YOU'RE A LIAR. I HAVE CHECK THREE DIFFERENT NAHJUL BALAGAH'S AND ALL OF THEM CONCUR THAT SERMON 216 IS ABOUT MAULA ALI (AS) PASSING BY THE CORPSE OF talha and abd ar rahman.
I posted the sermon to show just how much of a lanati liar you are.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE.BUT WHEN ALLAH REMINDS YOU OF WHAT YOU USED TO SAY.YOU WILL BE LOSER JUST WORSHIP ALLAH WITH NO SHIRK .STOP CURSING COMPANIONS AND WIVES.MAY ALLAH GUIDE YOU I HAVE DONE MY PART TO HELP.
12hamida 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12hamida RUN LIKE UMAR (LA)! In the end, I PROVED THAT YOU CANNOT DENY THE FACTS BECAUSE YOU'RE AN ENEMY OF ISLAM! I used straight ayats and authentic hadeeth and this is finally the result:
"LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE" - @12hamida
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 SINCE ARE DEBATES EVERY RAFIDI HADITH I POST YOU ARE QUICK TOO SAY IT IS A LIE INSTEAD OF REFUTING MY CLAIM YOU SAY IT IS A FABRICATION WELL YOUR WHOLKE RELIGION IS A FABRICATION AND A LIE YOU KNOW THIS TOO THE AHLA BIDA WELL GO TO ALL MEASURES AND DESPERATION TO PROVE BASELESS CLAIMS
12hamida 5 days ago
@12hamida every single post you've made has been answered in a credible manner. Nothing you've posted has a bit of legitimacy to it. Besides that, you've been posting up lies that I've exposed as well.
You've officially been defeated wahabi.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 YOU CURSING ALLAH NAME IS YOUR PROBLEM DIGGING A DEEPER HOLE FOR YOUR SELF.I TOLD YOU IN YOUR DELLLUSIONAL MIND YOU THINK YOU HAVE DEFEATED ME BUT IT IS NOT ABOUT THAT IT IS NOTHING I CAN SAY TO YOU TO BELEIVE IN ALLAH AND RASSOL.YOUR 12 GODS WELL NEVER BE BETTER THAN ALLAH OR RASSOL .YOU HAVE POSTED NOTHING LEGITIMATE LOOK AT ALL STUFF I POSTED YOUR ONLY REFUTE IS IT IS A LIE WHEN SHAI BOOKS SAY IT IS NOT
12hamida 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12hamida Who curses Allah's (swt) name other than yourself by praising his enemies (mauwiya & yazeed). each and every baseless claim of yours has been refuted. You've accepted defeat already by being proven a liar & saying " LOOK NO NEED TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU TO YOU BE YOUR RELIGION TO ME BE MINE"
You're finished!
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 DO THE LAYMEN SHIA KNOW BETTER THAN MAJLISI HILLALI KULANI KHOMENI ETC.THIS IS RAFIDI DIFFICULITY YOUR TRICKS AND TACTICS DONT WORK THE QURAN AND SUNNAH IS A WITNESS AGAINST YOUR CULT.EVERY SHIA HADITH I POSTED YOU GET OFFENDED BUT ONLY PROBLEM IM NOT SAYING IT IT IS YOUR SCHOLORS WHO WROTE IT YOU CANT DEFEND KUFR .
12hamida 5 days ago
@12hamida not at all. Every single "shia hadith" you've posted has been proven either to be:
1) taken out of context - Proven by me with logic and reasoning, as well as other strong narrations to prove it.
2) Not strong enough - again, proven through logic and other strong narrations
3) straight up lies - you're notorious for lying. Proved a few posts below
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 LOL SOUND LIKE A DEFEATED SHIA LISTEN TO YOUR HYPOCRICY.IT IS NOT OKAY FOR ME TO SAY YOU TAKE SUNNI HADITH OUT OF CONTEXT BUT IT IS OK FOR YOU TO SAY IT.FACE IT AND ADMIT IT YOU ARE EMBARRASSED OF YOUR BOOKS CANT DEFEND THEM NO HADITH I POSTED IS A LIE THATS YOUR TACTIC BECAUSE YOU CANT DEFEND THEM.YOU ARE ATYPICAL SHIA A SPINELESS COWARD LIKE IMAM ZAMAN LOL YOU.THIS PROVES YOU ARE A BIG COWARD MAY ALLAH CURSE YOU FOR YOUR SATANIC WAYS
12hamida 5 days ago
@12hamida
1) you said shias are kafirs
- Referenced the quran to point out that Allah (swt) clearly states that his prophets and their followers can only be referred to as shias. By you saying something against shias is contradicting the quran, and that's a sin.
2) you claimed shimr (la) was, naozaballah, a shia.
- cited shia, sunni and credible historical narrations as sources that make unbiased comments stating that shimr (la) was an enemy of islam who was directed by yazeed (la) to kill.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 ANY RAFIDI WITH BELEIFS LIKE YOURS ARE KAFIRS YOU DENY ALLAH AND ATTRIBUTE ALL THINGS TO YUR IMAMS YOU BELEIVE IF THE IMAMS SAY BE THATS WHAT IT IS YOU BELIVE IMAMS HAVE POWERS LIKE ALLAH SO I CAN BOLDLY SAY YOU ARE A MUSHRICK AND ESPECIALLY ALL YOUR SCHOLORS
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida "kafir"? The oath that we take is that there is nothing worthy of worship other than ALLAH (swt). Google dua-e-kumail, dua-e-tawassul, and any other supplication of ours. We ask only Allah (swt) for everything because nothing is greater than Allah (swt).
Once again, you contradict yourself.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 YOU UTTER THIS OATH BUT DONT KNOW ITS TRU MENAING YOUR IMAMS ARE BETTER TO YOU THAN ALLAH IF YOU BELEIVE THIS STOP UTTERING YA ALI MADAD "ONLY CALL ALLAH DONT EVEN CALL ON PROFETS ONLY ALLAH SO WHY DOES YOUR BOOKS SAY IMAMS HAVE POWERS LIKE ALLAH
12hamida 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 OH BY THE WAY DO YOU AGREE DIVORCE IS SOMETHING DISLIKED BY ALLAH HE FROWNS UPOON IT
12hamida 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 OKAY YOU HAVE TO BELEIVE IT SINCE YOU QUOTE QURAN SO MUCH LISTEN TO THIS PROOF THAT IMAM HASSAN WAS NOT INFALLIBLE HE DIVORCED 50 WOMEN AND HIS FATHER ALI RA GAVE A SERMON AND TOLD PEOPLE NOT TO MARRY DAUGHTERS TO HIM HERE IS PROOF 5/56 AL KAFI .
12hamida 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 TWO POINTS HERE ON BOTH NOT BEING INFALLIBLE "ONE IMAM ALI RA EXPOSED HIS SONS FAULT 2 IMAM HASSAN RA DIVORCED ALOT OF WOMEN AND ALLAH SAYS HE FROWNS UPON DIVORCE THERE IS A FEW MISTAKED THEY MADE OF COURSE YOU WILL DENY HADITH AS WEAK BUT GUESS WHAT YOUR FAMOUSE IMAM MAJILISI SAYS ABOUT HADITH HE SAYS IT IS "MUWATHDALAQ" SAHIH SO DONT GO AGAINST YOUR ULEMA
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida Please post up your reference so I can refute it with the quran. The trend is that I will always utilize the quran and AUTHENTIC CHAINS OF NARRATIONS WHICH WILL VALIDATE MY POINT, LIKE IT ALWAYS HAS, AGAINST YOUR RUBBISH.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 dellusional PERSON
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida
3) you praised that the greatest enemies of islam, muwiya (la) & yazeed (la)
- I stated authentic sunni narrations to prove to you how the evil of both of these lanatis was cited without any biased opinions. They were enemies of Allah (swt), who wanted power. Every single citation I posted all agreed that both were the walking contradiction of the quran, aka the enemies of Islam.
- I also cited how both are descendants of the enemies in badr, uhud khandaq..wars against the Prophet.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN BEING A SINNNER DOES NOT TAKE YOU OUT OF ISLAM DID NOT IMAM ALI ASK FOR FORGIVENESS ZAID ABELDEEN HASSAN HUSSSEIN THAT MEANS THEY MADE MISTAKES.KNOW ONE DOUBTS ABOUT YAZEED RA WRONG BUT WHO ARE WE TO TALK WRONG ABOUT SAHABA.
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida You're contradicting the quran now because verse 33:33 clearly states that Allah (swt) removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (pbut). I've cited every single credible narration to prove this. Maula Ali (as), or any other member of the Ahlulbayt (pbut) could not commit a sin because the quran is irrefutable.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@12hamida furthermore, "And We ASSIGNED from among them some Imams who GUIDE by Our authority since they were patient and believed firmly in Our Signs." (Quran 32:24)
The imams (pbut) are guides for the worshipers of Allah (swt). One of the key aspects of Islam is for worshipers to seek forgiveness. The Imams (as) gave us supplications for everything (ex seeking forgiveness) to cleanse our souls.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 lol YOU ARE A DESPERATE MAN THIS AYAT IS TALKING ABOUT PROFETS BETTER YET GO READE SHAI TAFSIR ON IT LOL YOU ARE A BALATANT DESPICIBLE RAFIDI TO LIE ON THE BOOK OF ALLAH LANAT ON YOU AND YOUR IMAM ZAMAN
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida You state that you're not against Maula Hussain (as) or the Prophet (pbuh), but you go ahead and send lanat on their descendant whom both proclaimed the one Allah (swt) will send to restore order and save the world.
"Indeed you are a warner, and to every people there is a guide." (13:7)
Allah (swt) clearly states that there will always be an Imam to guide worshipers towards the beneficence of Allah (swt). These guides represent Islam, which is perfect. 33:33 = Ahlulbayt = Perfection
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 13-7 IS TALKING ABOUT PROFETS ALSO WHEN WILL YOU UNDERSTANDF YOUR SHIA CULT IS A MADE UP RELIGION A BUNCH OF GOG WASH.I KNOW I BEEN TESTING YOUR EMAN IN THIS DEBATE YOU ARE HAVING DOUBTS ABOUT YOUR CULT AND YOU ARE STILL FIGHTING IT LOL
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida No, it is not only about the Prophets. Once again, your claim is baseless because Allah (swt) has said in the quran is perfect, and goes hand in hand with guidance.
akmnawab110 3 days ago
@akmnawab110 you shia dont beleive in present quran your hadith clearly stipulates this. you dont beleive in sunnah you replaced it with bida.you dont beleive in unseen Allah you beleive in 12 fase gods.(ya ali ya hussein ya hassan)if the quran you claim is perfect why do you beleive in 17,000 missing verses. why you bleive hidden coward imam will bring real quran
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida What makes your statement false about us, naozaballah, "not believing in the Quran", is the fact that I've been referencing the quran throughout this entire thread. Shias respect the quran more than wahabis...the same wahabis who bomb a masjid with the quran inside.
Also, that same quran tells us of Prophets & Guides, both of which I referenced earlier. I'm telling you once again that there is nothing worthy of worship other than Allah (swt).
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 AND IM TELLING YOU YOUR MOUTH UTTERS THIS BUT DOES NOT BELEIVE IN IT NOR UNDDERSTANDS IT.YOUR OWN SOURCES YOU BELEIVE OR SAY YOU BELEIVE IN SAY OTHERWISE YOUARE A RAFIDI AND YOU USE YOUR TAQIYAH ALL THE TIME TO PROVE NONESENSE.YOU DONT BELEIVE IN SHIA OR SUNNI HADITH LOL YOUARE A DISGRACE TO RAFIDISM
12hamida 2 days ago
@12hamida you're making an assumption, and that is haram because it is an opinionated judgment based off of nothing credible. I've provided my word and legitimate sources, most notably the quran, that serve as solid evidence that our aqeeda is simple:
1) Nothing is worthy of Worship other than Allah (swt).
2) Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the Messenger who delivered tawheed.
3) Maula Ali (as) is the guide to tawheed.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 Kindly stop this discussion. There is no need for the useless discussions. Instead we all should gain more knowledge.
urduwale 1 day ago
@urduwale The deen is being questioned, and I have been answering with legitimate and credible proof. He's been spreading hate, and it is our jobs as Muslims to defend the religion from any impurities or attacks. I kindly request you to just let the debate go on for another week and then delete all the unnecessary comments he has posted because he has no validity (sources, references, etc) in them. Let the world see how wahabis just talk without any credibility.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida The need for a Guide is a permanent one, and there is no way that Allah (swt) would leave it to human being to choose whoever they liked as the guide for the Ummah. Such a practice has no Qur’anic basis, and is in fact in clear violation to the Sunnah of Allah (swt), and as He (swt) says: "You will not find any change in the sunnah of Allah (swt)." (Quran: 33:62)
akmnawab110 3 days ago
@akmnawab110 you dont beleive in sunnah you replaced it with bida al kafi cant be sunnah it teaches kufr and shirk and to hate in al kafi it worships imams not ALLAH.you keep qouting quran is ironic because your creed goes against the book of Allah
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida A narration cannot be authorized as credible unless its chain of narrators is inspected, and whether the narration is compatible with the quran. This is why everything you say against the Ahlulbayt (pbut) is false because verse 33:33 clearly represents the them, and no one else. Every hadith associated with the validity of verse 33:33 and the Ahlulbayt (pbut) has been authorized as authentic by all scholars (both sects).
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 YEA YEA SURE VERSE 33-33 FOR THE 100 TIME IS TAKING OUT OF CONTEXT IT IS MEANT FOR WIVES NOT ALI HASSAN HUSSEIN FATIMA ONLY RA) BUT IF THAT IS WHAT YOU BELEIVE IT IS FINE NO PROBLEM.JUST REMEMBER HELL IS HOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
12hamida 2 days ago
@12hamida you haven't once provided a single hadith or legitimate source to prove your baseless claim. I have provided numerous strong narrations that prove verse 33:33 is only about the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Your claim of verse 33:33 being about the wives is absolutely preposterous because it contradicts with verses 33:29, 33:30 & 33:31 and authentic hadiths.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 NO YOU ARE LYING ABOUT THOSE AYATS AND HADITH.NO WHERE IN QURAN IS 12 IMAMS MENTIONED STOP YOUR LIES AND FABRICATIONS
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida In Sahih Muslim, there is a chapter named "Chapter of Virtues of the Companions". Inside this chapter, there is a section called "Section of the Virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet". There exists ONLY ONE tradition in this section, and this tradition has no reference to the wives of the Prophet (PBUH&HF). The tradition is known as "The Tradition of Cloak/Mantle" (Hadith al-Kisaa)
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.
Aisha (la) herself narrates that the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) clearly identifies the verse 33:33 to be only for him, Bibi Fatima (sa), Maula Ali (as), Maula Hassan (as) & Maula Hussain (as).
This is a fact, and you can google search it within seconds to confirm.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@akmnawab110 BESIDES ANY HADITH I POST FROM SHIA SOURCE YOU DENY THEM FAST CANT YOU CANT DEFEND IT AND SAY IT IS WEAK.SO I HAVE REFUTED ALL YOUR BASELESS CLAIMS
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida Kindly stop this discussion. There is no need for the useless discussions. Instead we all should gain more knowledge.
urduwale 1 day ago
@12hamida collectively, you've only posted up six "references"...I refuted all six with credible evidence. Two of them were lies and had nothing to do with the sermons found in Nahjul Balagah, and the other four were beyond weak in its credibility due to the narrators.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida Again, "O' Consorts of the Prophet! if any of you were guilty of evident misconduct conduct the Punishment would be doubled to her and that is easy for Allah." - 33:30
Sahih Bukhari, and other sunni sources pretty much expose aisha (la) and hafsa (la) as perpetrators of the Prophet. I've posted all of the sources in previous posts so there is absolutely no way that someone who possess impurities such as jealously, anger, etc. to be considered within the context of 33:33
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 I PROVIDED YOU PROOF THAT FATIMA RA WAS ALSO JEALOUS SO IS THAT A INFALLIBLE TRAIT AND ALI RA USED TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS IS THAT INFALLIBLE TRAIT.ALI RA GAVE BAYIAH TO ABU BAKR RA ACCORDING TO YOU HE IS A KAFIR LOL SO IS THAT INFALLIBLE
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida that "proof" did not prove your point. You clearly cannot interpret the english language, or else you would realize that the tone of that specific reference does not question the purity of any member of the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Furthermore, it contradicts your own purpose. Anyone who is not possessed with hatred (for which is clouding your judgment) will agree with me.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida Again, there are numerous citations that are credible in source/narrations from both sects that prove the Ahlulbayt to be free of impurities. I've posted most of them here, but its obvious that you do not read them. Besides that, its quite obvious that you're main purpose is to hide the truth, hence why you spam this video with the same baseless accusations just so the proof will be pushed to another page. I'm sure @urduwale will notice this and delete your spam.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida The reason why there would not be any change in the sunnah of Allah, especially with this practice, is the continued need that human beings have towards guidance. A living, present guide is always demanded, and such a person is Imam al-Mahdi (as).
akmnawab110 3 days ago
@akmnawab110 we beleive in different imams OURS IS NOT IN OCCULATION HIDING FORM SOME BIG GOVERNMENT OUT FOR HIM. OURS WILL HAVE A NATURAL BIRTH SAME NAME AS RASSOL HE IS NOT A ECONOMICAL TOOL FOR AYOOUTULLAHS TO GET GIRLS AND GET PAID MILLIONS IN NAME OF KHUMS
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida Once again, the verse of the Quran states: "One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)
"Imam" means guide, and since my religion is perfect, the guide to my religion will therefore be PERFECT (verse 33:33)
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 WE WILL SEE WHEN ALLAH PLACES 12 IMAMS IN FRONT OF YOU AND SAY WORSHIP THEM NOW.? WHAT WILL YOUR EXCUSE BE ON THAT DAY ALLAH WILLR REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU USED TO SAY.IM DONE WITH YOU THIS IS GETTING OLDD YOU CAN LEAD A HORSE TO WATER BUT CANT MAKE HIM DRINK
12hamida 2 days ago
@12hamida Excuse? I've proven time and time again with credible proof our belief is there is nothing worthy of worship other than Allah (Swt). What's quite odd is that you haven't provided a single bit of sources to back up your ridiculous and baseless claims.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 OKAY NO PROBLEM (SURAH 9-31 REMINDS ME OF THE SHIA )THEY TAKE THERE RABBIS AND MONKS FOR GODS BESIDES ALLAH )EVEN CHRISTIANS AND JEWS UTTER YOUR WORDS BUT DO THEYREALLY BELEIVE NO YOUR CREED IS LIKE THERES NO DIFFFERENCE
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida once again, "And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)
When you say anything about shias, you are insulting our Prophets (pbut). This just shows your level of ignorance.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN YOU ARE LYING ON QURAN IT MEANS BOOKS IN SOME PLACES AND PROFETS IN OTHERS VERSE 33-33 GO AGAINST YOUR CREED
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida you're a wahabi troll.
33:33 states "o people of the house....", so it cannot mean "books". Also, in the verses before this, it clearly states that those cohorts (wives) who commit sin will be punished double. I referenced countless sunni sources (ex: sahih) to prove that the evidence is unbiased against aisha (la) and hafsa (la).
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida "We will raise up a witness in every people, drawn from amongst themselves. And we shall bring thee as witnesses against these people. We have revealed to you [Prophet Muhammad] the Book which explains all things, guidance, a mercy, and good news to all the Muslims. (16:89)
Note here that Allah (swt) is not using the past tense, but is rather using the present tense (mudaria’). Now, the present tense can also be used to mean the future tense as well.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 MAN ARE YOU SERIOUS? CAN YUOU COMPREHEND ENGLISH ?THIS AYAT IS A PROOF AGAINST YOUR FASE CLAIM NOT HELPING YOU THIS MEANS JUDGEMENT DAY WHEN WE FACE ALLAH FOR OUR DEEDS.12 IMAMS ARE NOT IN QURAN NO WHERE STOP YOUR LYING YOUR KAFIR SCHOLORS ARE MISLEADING YOU AND YOU ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH TO SEE THAT
12hamida 2 days ago
@12hamida are you kidding me? It clearly states "GUIDE".
"One day, we shall call every people with their Imam. (17:71)
Are you meaning to say that you will face Allah (swt) with a guide who is imperfect, or someone whom the QURAN states as free from impurities?
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 once again your imams are not infallible only ALLAH IS.THEY WERE INFALLIBLE IN TAWHEED ONLY DID NOT COMMIT THE SHIRK YU PROPAGATE THERE AQEEDA IS DIFFERENT FROM YOURS.EVEN IMAM ZAMAN (LA)IS NOT INFALLIBLE CAUSE HE IS AFRAID TO GO IN BATTLEFIELD IT STATES IN SHIA BOOKS
12hamida 1 day ago
@12hamida "Imam-e-zamana" literally means "IMAM OF OUR TIME". Allah (swt) states in the quran: "One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)
The quran is not just a book about the past, but serves as a guide for all time. In this verse, Allah (swt) clearly claims that he will call all people with their Imam (guide). When you associate such vile, disrespectful and disgusting comments with our Imam, you contradict Allah's (swt) command.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida Once again, it is simple to understand that verse 33:33 means removing all sins from the house because they will reflect the perfection of Allah (swt) and the Quran by guiding (Allah's) creations towards the religion of Islam. If anyone associates themselves with sins, how will they be capable of leading with credibility? This is why you will never find any impurities associated with the Ahlulbayt (pbut). They are a reflection of Allah (swt), so do not disrespect them.
akmnawab110 1 day ago
@12hamida Again, credible narrations from both shias and sunni sources have cited that 33:33 is about the Ahlulbayt (pbut). They are free from impurities because they reflect the religion of Islam (perfection).
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@12hamida "One day Allah will raise up a witness from every people, and then no excuse will be accepted from the unbelievers." (16:84)
"One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)
These verses establish that all times and all places there is, in some form or another, a blessed individual who receives guidance directly from Allah (swt). Allah (swt) Himself who will appoint this guide and witness to every people.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@akmnawab110 ONCE AGAIN MORE AYATS TALKING ABOUT IMAMS GO READ SHIA RAFIDI TAFSIR ON THOSE AYATS LOL MAY ALLAH CURSE YOU FOR BEING A LIAR
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida Excuse me, but the "tafsir" you have reference is legitimately weak. All hadith have to be taking into context with the quran, and that is why the "hadith" you post against the Ahlulbayt (pbut) will always be weak. The quran clearly states in verse 33:33 that Allah (swt) has removed all impurities from the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Aisha (la) even narrated that this, and many authentic hadeeth agreed on the association.
akmnawab110 3 days ago
@akmnawab110 lmao TYPICAL RAFIDI RUNNING FROM THRUTH. ITS WEAK SO WHY YOUR SCHOLORS USE IT LIAR
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida It took me a day to research your sources.
1) sharh nahj il-balaagha was written by ibne abi 'I-hadid who was a sunni mu'tazili. This book is not used by any shia scholar because of the weak chains of narrations.
2) There's no book called "ihejaz"..you can check google to confirm this.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@akmnawab110 LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL WOW ARE YOU EVEN A SHIA ? MAN YOUR TAQIYAH IS TERRIBLE PEOPLE CAN SEE RIGHT THREW IT .SO NOW NAHAL BALAGA IS A FASE SUNNI BOOK LOL WOW THE SHAI LAYMEN ARE MORE KNOWLDGEABLE THAN SCHOLORS SO YOU KNOW MORE THAN RAFIDI SCHOLORS LOL LMAO THE LESS YOU TALK THE MORE INTELLIGENT YOU SOUND IM DONE WITH YOU I HAD FUN.INSHALLA YOU BECOME MUSLIM AND WHAT EVER I SAID I APOLOGIZE TO YOU FOR ANY OFFENSIVE REMARKS MAY ALLAH FORGIVE ME AND YOU .
12hamida 2 days ago
@12hamida no, the book you were referring to is "Sharh nahj 'l-balaagah" which was written by ibn abi 'l-hadid, a sunni mutazili. The Real Nahjul Balagah is written by Maula Ali (as). This is why I can confidently say the book you referenced is not credible, let alone used by any shia scholars. This makes your argument beyond baseless.
akmnawab110 2 days ago
@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61. - aisha (la) narrates herself that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) stated: the Prophet recited: "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33)."
akmnawab110 3 days ago
@akmnawab110 16-84 is talking about profets for there nations on judement day.not shia gods (12imams)17-71 is talking about imams not shia gods there is not one single verse that talks about 12 imams in quran you despicible liar.
12hamida 3 days ago
@12hamida This person that Allah (swt) is speaking about is not somebody elected by the Muslims in anyway shape or form, and This person that Allah (swt) is speaking about is not somebody elected by the Muslims in anyway shape or form, and the Muslims (or anybody else in the cosmos) have absolutely no input on who this person is to going to be.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@12hamida 4) You stated that, naozaballah, Maula Hussain (as) should've never gone to karbala.
- I posted the quranic ayats that justified Maula's (as) purpose to go to karbala was to defend Islam from the tyrant yazeed (la). yazeed (la), a walking contradiction of the quran, demanded the the Prophet's grandson authorize his rule or else he would be slaughtered. Maula Hussain (as) knew islam would cease to exist if he gave bayat to yazeed (la), hence the journey to defend islam in karbala.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 NO WHERE IN QURAN DOES ALLAH TALK ABOUT HUSSEIN STOP YOUR WAR ON THE QURAN PLEASE .HE WENT AGAINST THE SHURA COUNSEL LISTEN TO HOW STUPID YOU SOUND HE WENT THERE TO SAVE ISLAM LOL SO ALLAH IS THAT WEAK.THAT HE CANT PROTECT HIS RELIGION .USE COMMON SENSE
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida I quoted this below, but you obviously did not care to read or reference it because you're an enemy of islam who rejects the quran (Allah's words).
"Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness." (25:52)
Everything historical narration about yazeed (la) confirms the fact that he was a walking contradiction of Allah (swt). His intent was to destroy islam with bayat, hence why Imam Hussain went against him based on the QURAN.
akmnawab110 4 days ago
@12hamida
5) You stated that, naozaballah, umar (la) was granted successorship.
- Once again, I utilized strong sunni narrations (all credible in their chains) that state Maula Ali (as) as being appointed the successor at ghadir. More so, even abu bakr (la) and umar (la) themselves declared it. Not only did I cite bukhari, but I cited the books written by prominent sunni scholars praised by the wahabi ideology in saudi.
akmnawab110 5 days ago
@akmnawab110 LOL OH YEA RIGHT AT A REST STOP SO INSTEAD OF ALI RA OBEYING THE PEOFET HE BOWED DOWNLIKE A COWARD AND GAVE LEADERSHIP TO ABU BAKR RA.SHIA ACCOUNTS OF GUIDER KHUMS IS A EXAGGERRATED STORY.SO ALI RA GAVE ALLEGIENCE TO A KAFIRWHEN YOUR OWN BOOKS SAY IT IS HARAM.STOP INSULTING ALI RA OF COWARDICE HE WAS THE ONE OF THE BRAVEST MEN IN ISLAM.MAWLA DOES NOT MEAN SUCESSOR RAFIDI
12hamida 4 days ago
@12hamida Once again, what refutes your comment is the fact that all authentic narrations with strong chains cite Maula Ali (as) as the rightful successor because the sanctity of the perfect religion (islam) would only be safe in the care of someone perfect (Ahlulbayt). After all, they are guides.
NEVER DID MAULA ALI (AS) GIVE BAYAT TO abu bakr. You only talk about this, but you never once bought any credible reference to it because it doesn't exist.
akmnawab110 4 days ago