Jam, the vocals are flawed because you were too close to the microphone without without that thing to stop the p's and t's they use in the music studios. Still, LMAO!
It is funny how atheists get all of their ideas about the Bible from literature in the middle ages rather than the Bible. No one named Lucifer is actually in the Bible. In Isaiah 14:12 the King James translators personify the morning star with the name Lucifer, but the Hebrew underlying that really just means "morning star". We have no idea if a person or entity named Lucifer exists, or has any relationship to Satan. Nor do we know if either Satan or anyone named Lucifer was once an angel.
Even the King James translation doesn't claim Lucifier was an angel or that he was originally perfect or any of the other ideas created around that name by middle age literature and incorporated into this video. That single verse doesn't even say it was a person, and a better hebrew translation if you go back to the source would be "morning star". In other words, these ideas about Lucifier in this video aren't biblical, they are from middle ages literature. Same place we get horns & a pitchfork
Actually they are from ezekial 28 I believe. The name is in itself irrelevant. And if all these translations just are not up to snuff as you seem to believe then god must be pretty feeble indeed to allow his words to be corrupted.
No, there is nothing wrong with the Bible, it doesn't have the concepts about Lucifer that are being assumed it does. For example, the Bible doesn't have the devil with pitchforks. Those are ideas from literature written in the Middle Ages. German peasants thought pitchforks the most common weapon, so they imagined the devil with a pitchfork. Likewise, all the ideas about Lucifier being a perfect angel who fell from grace simply aren't in the Bible. Later writers are the source, not the Bible.
It's funny how most of Western civilization -and not only Atheists- got all of its ideas about the bible from literature in the middle ages rather than the bible.
By the way, many Atheists are quite aware of what the bible actually says, chapter and verse, since many of us WERE Christians and some of us WERE Fundamentalist Christians.
Please see users:
ChelevSaRa
FFreeThinker
for users who go straight to the bible.
If I can remember or find any others, I'll make sure to tell you.
amoxtlacatl: I am sure some atheists are quite familiar with the Bible, particularly those who are former Christians in the US. However, I see far more YT atheists who claim to know the Bible, but who think Cain and Abel were Adam and Eve's only children. [Hint: Seth and others] and have many other similar mistaken ideas. Many YT atheists in Europe in particular often freely admit they have only read "parts" or none at all. Usually making some snide comment about it being fictional.
@sarabellumm It's fucking hilarious how Theist's thin EVERYTHING was created in 6 days by a sky dude with nothing more than his voice. BTW, the sun and stars came before the Earth, BILLIONS of years ago. (^,000 -/+? LOL!) In the context of E.T. life and genetic manipulation, shit seems plausable. Baby Angel Jeffrey should murder God in his sleep to wake him from his delusional state of non-being. ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER AND HIS NOODLY APPENDAGES!! ARRR! (I'm a Pirate!)
@TheCrimsonification-- You are confusing theism with the narrow group of Young Earth Creationists who believe everything was a literal six days. I believe the earth is billions of years old for example, yet I am a theist.
@sarabellumm The bible says god created the Erth in 6 days. Period...end of story. Straight up bullshit. Every word after is just as fucked. Believe completely or not at all. Stop sitting on the fucking fence, Agnostic. Don't kid yerself. Yer Agnostic.
@TheCrimsonification "The bible says god created the Erth in 6 days. Period...end of story."
When we say "With the election of President Obama, it is a new day in America" do you take that to mean he will be President for a single day? Seemingly you must, it says "day". Or can day sometimes mean era or period? Given you see the sun and moon created on the third "day" doesn't that tip you off the author doesn't mean a 24-hour "day"? This isn't that hard to see.
@sarabellumm So what you're saying is the "LITERAL WORD OF GOD" i.e. the Bible is full of shit? I already knew that. Stop being an annoying piece of shit that thinks it's King Turd of Ethical Island. Seriously...nobody likes you. Go away and die somewhere the bugs will get you.
@TheCrimsonification I am saying you are misreading it, probably deliberately because you don't want to believe. It should be plainly obvious reading that must be what is meant. You don't have any problem with using a day to mean an era even in modern day English with our obsessions with time. Before the sun and moon, obviously the word is talking about a time period, not 24 hours.
@sarabellumm I fully understand the concept of calendar time (Gregorian and otherwise) BUT by TODAY's standards and religious math, the world is around 6,000 years old. Yer all messed up brainfucked morons. God and religion in general is bullshit. Anyone who belives it is a fucking retarded zombie. Fuck you. Fuck yer god. Fuck religion. I'm done with you. Fuck off.
"BUT by TODAY's standards and religious math, the world is around 6,000 years old. "
None of that is anywhere in the Bible. The Bible has no dates whatsoever. You really haven't even disputed the point that when the term "day" is used it isn't always 24-hours. I don't know what you mean by religious math, as far as I can see those saying 6,000 years old are using Bishop Ussher's calculations from the 17th century, not anything modern. But you realize all that, thus the childish rant & cussing.
@sarabellumm My responce to you is simply Fuck off and die, because you bring nothing to the table that ain't bee brung before that ain't been chewed up and spit out by real people and not zombie motherfuckers loyal to the indoctrification of the Church.
@sarabellumm Do you really, honestlt think I give a flying rat's diseased ass what you think of me? Get fucking real, shitstain. You and yer opinions mean piss fuck all to me. Fry yer left nut in a fire & make the right one jealous.
@TheCrimsonification Thankfully I have no testicles. But then you probably don't have a lot of girls talk with you for very long and don't recognize the name Sara as a girl's name.
@sarabellumm No. Nobody talks to me. I'm a mean, happy shithead with opinions that people don't like. Thakfully I couldn't fucking care any less if they all offered me blowjobs and Rice Kripie squares. The entire human race more or less bugs me. Now, go grease up a flagpole and make that motherfucker disappear.
So you mean that even you serve the almighty, all-powerful, omnipotent, omniscient God also makes mistakes?
altairx26 1 year ago
@altairx26 Indeed he's egotistic which means bound to make mistakes, and because of that we are all being punished for it...
Gamer1990100 9 months ago
Jam, the vocals are flawed because you were too close to the microphone without without that thing to stop the p's and t's they use in the music studios. Still, LMAO!
theScytheofGod 1 year ago
lol´d about VFX as god
Cromwell523 1 year ago
"perfect"? Hey God, I can't hear you over all that pride you're spitting out!
demonjacobs666 1 year ago
Hey, is that Venomfangx's face that you're using for God?
Kieranfoy 2 years ago
Hahahahahahahahaha!!! That is about the size of it. ;O) ★★★★★
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 3 years ago
It is funny how atheists get all of their ideas about the Bible from literature in the middle ages rather than the Bible. No one named Lucifer is actually in the Bible. In Isaiah 14:12 the King James translators personify the morning star with the name Lucifer, but the Hebrew underlying that really just means "morning star". We have no idea if a person or entity named Lucifer exists, or has any relationship to Satan. Nor do we know if either Satan or anyone named Lucifer was once an angel.
sarabellumm 3 years ago
So the king james is not the bible apparently. But at any rate it's public domain.
jamminjago 3 years ago
Even the King James translation doesn't claim Lucifier was an angel or that he was originally perfect or any of the other ideas created around that name by middle age literature and incorporated into this video. That single verse doesn't even say it was a person, and a better hebrew translation if you go back to the source would be "morning star". In other words, these ideas about Lucifier in this video aren't biblical, they are from middle ages literature. Same place we get horns & a pitchfork
sarabellumm 3 years ago
Actually they are from ezekial 28 I believe. The name is in itself irrelevant. And if all these translations just are not up to snuff as you seem to believe then god must be pretty feeble indeed to allow his words to be corrupted.
jamminjago 3 years ago
No, there is nothing wrong with the Bible, it doesn't have the concepts about Lucifer that are being assumed it does. For example, the Bible doesn't have the devil with pitchforks. Those are ideas from literature written in the Middle Ages. German peasants thought pitchforks the most common weapon, so they imagined the devil with a pitchfork. Likewise, all the ideas about Lucifier being a perfect angel who fell from grace simply aren't in the Bible. Later writers are the source, not the Bible.
sarabellumm 3 years ago
@sarabellumm Later writers WROTE the Bible.
demonjacobs666 1 year ago
ISA 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O LUCIFER, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! -KJV
Strong's Concordance
Lucifer = "light-bearer" 1. shining one, morning star, Lucifer
a. of the king of Babylon and Satan (fig.)
pirbird14 3 years ago
It's funny how most of Western civilization -and not only Atheists- got all of its ideas about the bible from literature in the middle ages rather than the bible.
By the way, many Atheists are quite aware of what the bible actually says, chapter and verse, since many of us WERE Christians and some of us WERE Fundamentalist Christians.
Please see users:
ChelevSaRa
FFreeThinker
for users who go straight to the bible.
If I can remember or find any others, I'll make sure to tell you.
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago
amoxtlacatl: I am sure some atheists are quite familiar with the Bible, particularly those who are former Christians in the US. However, I see far more YT atheists who claim to know the Bible, but who think Cain and Abel were Adam and Eve's only children. [Hint: Seth and others] and have many other similar mistaken ideas. Many YT atheists in Europe in particular often freely admit they have only read "parts" or none at all. Usually making some snide comment about it being fictional.
sarabellumm 2 years ago
@sarabellumm It's fucking hilarious how Theist's thin EVERYTHING was created in 6 days by a sky dude with nothing more than his voice. BTW, the sun and stars came before the Earth, BILLIONS of years ago. (^,000 -/+? LOL!) In the context of E.T. life and genetic manipulation, shit seems plausable. Baby Angel Jeffrey should murder God in his sleep to wake him from his delusional state of non-being. ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER AND HIS NOODLY APPENDAGES!! ARRR! (I'm a Pirate!)
TheCrimsonification 4 months ago
@TheCrimsonification-- You are confusing theism with the narrow group of Young Earth Creationists who believe everything was a literal six days. I believe the earth is billions of years old for example, yet I am a theist.
sarabellumm 4 months ago
@sarabellumm The bible says god created the Erth in 6 days. Period...end of story. Straight up bullshit. Every word after is just as fucked. Believe completely or not at all. Stop sitting on the fucking fence, Agnostic. Don't kid yerself. Yer Agnostic.
TheCrimsonification 4 months ago
@TheCrimsonification "The bible says god created the Erth in 6 days. Period...end of story."
When we say "With the election of President Obama, it is a new day in America" do you take that to mean he will be President for a single day? Seemingly you must, it says "day". Or can day sometimes mean era or period? Given you see the sun and moon created on the third "day" doesn't that tip you off the author doesn't mean a 24-hour "day"? This isn't that hard to see.
sarabellumm 4 months ago
@sarabellumm So what you're saying is the "LITERAL WORD OF GOD" i.e. the Bible is full of shit? I already knew that. Stop being an annoying piece of shit that thinks it's King Turd of Ethical Island. Seriously...nobody likes you. Go away and die somewhere the bugs will get you.
TheCrimsonification 4 months ago
@TheCrimsonification I am saying you are misreading it, probably deliberately because you don't want to believe. It should be plainly obvious reading that must be what is meant. You don't have any problem with using a day to mean an era even in modern day English with our obsessions with time. Before the sun and moon, obviously the word is talking about a time period, not 24 hours.
sarabellumm 4 months ago
@sarabellumm I fully understand the concept of calendar time (Gregorian and otherwise) BUT by TODAY's standards and religious math, the world is around 6,000 years old. Yer all messed up brainfucked morons. God and religion in general is bullshit. Anyone who belives it is a fucking retarded zombie. Fuck you. Fuck yer god. Fuck religion. I'm done with you. Fuck off.
TheCrimsonification 3 months ago
"BUT by TODAY's standards and religious math, the world is around 6,000 years old. "
None of that is anywhere in the Bible. The Bible has no dates whatsoever. You really haven't even disputed the point that when the term "day" is used it isn't always 24-hours. I don't know what you mean by religious math, as far as I can see those saying 6,000 years old are using Bishop Ussher's calculations from the 17th century, not anything modern. But you realize all that, thus the childish rant & cussing.
sarabellumm 3 months ago
@sarabellumm My responce to you is simply Fuck off and die, because you bring nothing to the table that ain't bee brung before that ain't been chewed up and spit out by real people and not zombie motherfuckers loyal to the indoctrification of the Church.
TheCrimsonification 3 months ago
@TheCrimsonification Again with the rants and cussing rather than showing any facts to counter the ones I have given you.
sarabellumm 3 months ago
@sarabellumm Do you really, honestlt think I give a flying rat's diseased ass what you think of me? Get fucking real, shitstain. You and yer opinions mean piss fuck all to me. Fry yer left nut in a fire & make the right one jealous.
TheCrimsonification 3 months ago
@TheCrimsonification Thankfully I have no testicles. But then you probably don't have a lot of girls talk with you for very long and don't recognize the name Sara as a girl's name.
sarabellumm 3 months ago
@sarabellumm No. Nobody talks to me. I'm a mean, happy shithead with opinions that people don't like. Thakfully I couldn't fucking care any less if they all offered me blowjobs and Rice Kripie squares. The entire human race more or less bugs me. Now, go grease up a flagpole and make that motherfucker disappear.
TheCrimsonification 3 months ago
Hmm well, at least you're drawing again.
wavgirl 3 years ago
I dunno if id consider a few lines and colors in paint drawing hot stuff.
jamminjago 3 years ago
I'll take what I can get... and I still have the "original" Flik drawing in a scrapbook somewhere.
wavgirl 3 years ago
I wonder what happens next!
*stays tuned*
KaseyAkira 3 years ago
You was, but you fucked it all up! :)
dosnostalgic 3 years ago
Hahaha excellent. VFX as god, priceless. Well done sir.
joshTheGoods 3 years ago
Mercy, Lord!
havas 3 years ago