The 'personality' of the jet engine is not as much in the sound of it running, as in the sound of it starting.. I'd recognise the start up of a Saab J35 Draken anywhere.. :)
This looks like a beautiful aircraft, it still looks like an aircraft should look, in spite of being one of the most modern jets to date.. :)
@BasicModelling Yes, indeed :) But it IS a Rafale. The problem is with the resolution of the camera: the canard wings of the Rafale are so small, mostly at that distance, that are almost imperceptible as recorded with this (photo) camera.
I do have a videocam with a much, much better zoom, sound and image quality, but besides that I still don´t know very well how to use it, I just can´t watch in the computer the videos I recorded with it. And it´s a shame...
@AlanMartinNala I have the same problem, I bought a really good camera for money I got for my birthday a few years ago, and it has hardly been used, as it just won't work on the computer.. I bought it mainly for airshow videos as it has a very good sound uptake and a great zoom.. One day I hope to be able to use it.. :P
@BasicModelling Eeeerrr... Well, piston engines are also supposed to sound different from each other in their start (not only once running). Even more, I guess that different versions of the same (piston) engine also sound different (not so sure among jets, to my view...) For instance, the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 of a Wildcat certainly sounds different from that of a Hellcat, both in start and run. Thus, there will always be, as I see it, more sounds among pistons than among jets...
love this sound! cool!
CapLAGOS 1 year ago
@CapLAGOS He! I had the feeling that you were going to say that X) Thank you! ;)
AlanMartinNala 1 year ago
The 'personality' of the jet engine is not as much in the sound of it running, as in the sound of it starting.. I'd recognise the start up of a Saab J35 Draken anywhere.. :)
This looks like a beautiful aircraft, it still looks like an aircraft should look, in spite of being one of the most modern jets to date.. :)
BasicModelling 1 year ago
If anything, at some angles this looks much like the Draken.. :)
BasicModelling 1 year ago
@BasicModelling Yes, indeed :) But it IS a Rafale. The problem is with the resolution of the camera: the canard wings of the Rafale are so small, mostly at that distance, that are almost imperceptible as recorded with this (photo) camera.
I do have a videocam with a much, much better zoom, sound and image quality, but besides that I still don´t know very well how to use it, I just can´t watch in the computer the videos I recorded with it. And it´s a shame...
AlanMartinNala 1 year ago
@AlanMartinNala I have the same problem, I bought a really good camera for money I got for my birthday a few years ago, and it has hardly been used, as it just won't work on the computer.. I bought it mainly for airshow videos as it has a very good sound uptake and a great zoom.. One day I hope to be able to use it.. :P
BasicModelling 1 year ago
@BasicModelling Eeeerrr... Well, piston engines are also supposed to sound different from each other in their start (not only once running). Even more, I guess that different versions of the same (piston) engine also sound different (not so sure among jets, to my view...) For instance, the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 of a Wildcat certainly sounds different from that of a Hellcat, both in start and run. Thus, there will always be, as I see it, more sounds among pistons than among jets...
AlanMartinNala 1 year ago
@AlanMartinNala Definetely.. I agree.. :)
BasicModelling 1 year ago