Ok so we can do that using cloning (look it up its not scify any more.) but that means nothing... so if i see a non science created half man half monkey walking around then ill believe you.
have you notice how they say this , yet ALL the species in between are dead... oh my mistake their is one called bigfoot, aboriginies in australia have been around for about 40000 years , why have they not evolved further
@brookcie1 well you call us crazy and stupid, because we believe in a creator, yet you guys believe that the universe just POPPED into existance,eg if you asked me where did that car from and I said "it just POPPED into existance" you would think i'm crazy, since you guys are SO knowlegable then how did the big bang come into being and why is there NO living proof of ANY of the species between the ape and man
@sleepup7931 I never called you crazy and stupid, you just assume and I never said anything of what you just blabbered about. My point is that you sound ill educated when you point out an obvious fact that YES, Aboriginals have been around for thousands of year, BUT we (white men/women) have been around for the same amount of time (just on different places). We ARE in the same evolutionary state (about the same place). BTW I am an alternate Christian and believe that GOD made the Big Bang.
@animaljp3 well then you donot know much about alligators/ crocodiles then , as the sex of their babies are determine by the temprature and if there was an ice age , then they would have DIED with the dinosaurs , oh and they are reptiles aswell ,so if there was an ice age, they would have DIED
@animaljp3 well fromn the fact of a LIVING dinosuar in front of our eye and before you guys start thinking idiot, why donot you check about the life cycle of the crocodile and the alligator , i donot say there was not an ice age but an isolated incedent and not a world wide event
@paradisecityX0 I dont know if this is sarcasm or not xD but that guy was retarded you must think evolution does exist but not all from monkeys lmao like hippos and whales evolved from the same animal and there is proof did you guys know whales have ankle bones i mean seriously if evolution didnt take place why would a whale even develop them i don't know everything but i can say there is enough evidence to back up evolution i mean people have followed religion for centuries with no proof
I wonder if anyone has had the idea to teach their kids creation/evolution plus a collection of current counter arguments to each... seeing how things are not always as clear cut as they seem might do wonders for their own empirical abilities.
The "First Awakened Human" In the "Human Race", had to be "Re-engineered" To Have A Proper Biological Mechanism To Enforce The First Law: STRICTLY NO SEX BETWEEN CLOSEST FAMILY MEMBER, There is All SEEING, FEARFUL yet LOVING GOD, If Your Break The Law, You'll be Thrown into the BURNING HELL Literally. Means, There was other "MUCH MORE ADVANCE ENTITY" that GUIDED this The First Awakened Human To Understand the BAD RESULT of Being Forever APE / Primate As "THEY" Want Human..Right?
Don't Tell me, The "First Awakened Human", In the beginning of "Human Race", had a knowledge in Evolutionary/Revolutionary Biology, made some experiment in Genetic Engineering, Finally, discovered that if SEXUAL ACTIVITY kept on going between closest family member, You all Forever PRIMATE / Monkey. Instead of Obeying The Order of Natural Selection, This Awakened Human made a Revolutionary Movement to Fulfil Natural Selection of The Evolution ??? Please Explain >>>
Info: Neutrally and Without Political Border, We Studied Various Disciplinary such as Physics, Cosmology, Chemistry, Evolutionary/Revolutionary Biology, Recorded History, Geography and so on to be blended, We have implemented the same "Repeatable Proven System" as required by Science, We see Mr Dawkins is SOOOOOOOOOO Outdated/Backward/Stupid for Ignoring the ULTIMATE Role of Evolution Of Languages and Evolution of Religions in The Evolution Of Mankind. For Both That Make Us ALL "HUMAN" Now..
After watching about 10 videos regarding creationism and evolution, i realised evolutionists are stupid. They are clearly smarter and still they arent feeding on the weak minded creationists. Dont treat them as equals, EAT THEM!
You're argument is invalid. You're saying that if a monkey WAS to give birth to a human baby, it would change peoples views. Correct you're there, but seeing a man healing people, walking on water, etc would do the same as well. Really can't we all just get along?
@chavezery09 That doesn't mean anything? Besides, the US was founded upon secularism. Believing in creationism is the acceptance of something fallacious. Why would you teach kids that?
@RyanLikesTool “America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.” - Joseph Stalin
The entire movement of the separation of church and state happened because of that quote, communists wanted to rule over us. If you want further proof of that, read "The Naked Communist."
Also, explain one way that creationism is fallacious.
@chavezery09 No, your country's founders consisted of secularists. They didn't at any point say that America was a Christian country. Just because it was emphasized later on that America isn't a Christian nation wasn't to say that it ever was in the first place. Because I assure you that believers in different religions would still have been present at the time. And one way that creationism is fallacious? Because there is no evidence to show that the universe had a divine creator. It fills gaps.
@RyanLikesTool Sure, it wasn't created with only Christians, but it was primarily Christian and founded by people who wanted us to maintain Christian morals.
And htere is a lot of evidence that shows the universe has a divine creator, you apparently haven't seen much in this world.
@chavezery09 It was still made a secular country from the beginning though, meaning that you were allowed to have your own beliefs. Religion was man-made, meaning that morals were also exactly that. It would be an insult to say that we wouldn't have any decent governing system, or any decent law system without religion.
And actually, no there is NONE to show that the universe has a divine creator. In fact, it's quite an ignorant suggestion to say that it does.
@chavezery09 If you were to bring the cosmological, teleological, moral arguments into play here, I'd definitely warn you not to. Although, the world does show things that are only apparent to us as intelligently designed, this is only because that is the way we think. We could not deem anything natural to be intelligently designed because we'd only be doing so on the basis that things in our world are designed.
@chavezery09 And even though the world may appear to have order, even our solar system appears to have an extremely intricate order: this does not mean that there was intelligent structure behind that order. It is only because we intelligently order things ourselves that, once again, we assume all complex things that appear to be in order, intelligently structured.
@chavezery09 I could go onto movement, causation, necessity, degree, etc. But it's plainly obvious. Just because we assume things to be created intelligently (because we intelligently create things ourselves) does not mean that they really are intelligently created.
@chavezery09 "The entire movement of the separation of church and state happened because of that quote"
huh? What does the First Amendment have to do with Stalin?
"explain one way that creationism is fallacious."
The facts and evidence of evolution. But by all means, if you want to believe in creationism, please explain the genius of my appendix. Or for that matter, explain the purpose of wisdom teeth from a creationist perspective.
@TheHigherVoltage No one really complained about the separation of church and state before Stalin made that quote -- Communists started to try to take over the country after he said that. (Read: The Naked Communist)
Also, evolution? You're kidding me, right?
That thing that even Charles Darwin didn't really believe in?
Apparently you don't know the difference between abiogenesis and micro-evolution, because abiogenesis has been proven wrong time and time again. (Look it up)
@chavezery09 Abiogenesis has yet to be proven wrong. You might as well be in the 19th century claiming 'manned flight has been proven wrong time and time again!' Just because something hasn't been figured out, doesn't mean it's been proven wrong.
If you think evolution is wrong, next time you get an infection, don't take modern meds - they are all now developed on our understanding of evolution. Pray for healing. Jesus said that'll work. And Jesus wasn't a liar was he?
2nd Human chromosome contains centralised teleomeres, showing that a fusion of the simian 2nd and 3rd chromosomes took place.
This is SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE of humanity's kinship with the great apes in particular the Bunobo Chimpanzee.
Given our facial structure also, it seems our heads stay in a "juvenile" bone structure, our jaw never moves as far forward as it does in adult great apes but is very comparable in structure to that of any juvenile great ape
So did monkeys also give birth to dogs, cats, birds, fish, tigers, lions, if monkeys gave birth to only Humans, then where did all the other animals come from, huh?
@DeZoneGaming We are in the same genetic family as apes, monkeys, ect. We were never "monkeys" but were once an even more closely related humanoid species which mutated into humans. Also bear in mind that different locations, climates, altitudes, ect. are all developing factors that determined these different species. Birds were once aquatic creatures and they grow gills in the womb (of which fall off before birth). There is evidence everywhere, you're just a moron.
Bubbles the chimp could give birth to Richard Dawkins, three elephants and a ready-cooked lobster. Creationists would still manage to rationalise it into supporting their dogmas.
@Coughlan616 your just about the dumbest idiot I have ever heard. Monkeys became humans apparently because a mutation in the gene pool caused one of the apes to give birth to a hairless offspring, which mated with other apes, birthing more hairless primates, who continued this, birthing a couple of them with larger brains, also a mutation, and then we eventually evolved into what we are today.
Not hairless, you do not understand evolution at all you silly heretic (trying to prove something that requires faith is a religious heresy), slightly less hair, if this is advantages then this mutation is passed on, later on down the line slightly larger brains, and so on a so forth etc etc etc
@goo5976 And one more thing, we have GENES that are only activated under certain conditions, we've only scratched the surface of how we can observe and use the human genome, this means that during a single creatures lifetime they can adapt to the environment, and yet one more FUCKING thing, religion/morals/technology are the product of an advanced society, you no longer have to forage and hurt for food spending all your time if survival, this allows religion, not silly ideas of an ignorant human
@goo5976 riiiight, ape-men with larger brains filled with a bunch of hot air. says the kid who relies on evolution. oh wait, dogs evolved from rocks 0.0
@goo5976 Chill out? I'm perfectly calm :) It's atheists that can't stand to be proven wrong, so they use scientific evidence (not perfect, need I remind u), a bunch of blasphemous insults, and...THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER defense :o
@goo5976 And if u die and wake up in a hideous, all-negative universe (chained, scorching 3rd degree fire, raining sufur, the sound of childrens' screams, clenching of teeth, ur worst fears and nightmares a reality, the smell of burning/dead flesh...all for eternity), would u actually risk that for the sake of ur ego? I want u to think about that and be serious for once.
@paradisecityX0 your legitimately starting to piss me off. you keep giving judgemental statements. whos to say im not serious? you? someone who doesnt know me? nah. i dont try to be a good person. i just do what i think is right as much as i can. meaning i believe in karma. i dont feel like hearing about all this right now.
there is one argument that creationists continue to pose and its that the pre-cambrian fossil forms don't have any common ancestors.they literally pop out of nowhere w/ nothing to link them back.. However, it could be that those ancestors of the forms in the pre-cambrian era have not been found, or may be destroyed For those of you out there that do believe in God and find it hard to w/ the theory of evolution no that the bible cannot be completely true.. it was written by people not God himself
Ahhh you Creationalists... Your religion will soon disappear... just like every other Religion that came before has disappeared! Just ask Thor, or Apollo, or ... you get my point.
“Scientists love mysteries. They love not knowing. That’s the key part of science; the excitement of learning about the universe… … …
This is so different than the sterile aspect of religion, where the excitement is apparently knowing everything; although clearly knowing nothing.”
@ajesusfreak1 Jupiter, Minerva, Juno, Anubis, etc. must have been powerful ppl (leaders, rulers, higher humans maybe), but nowhere close to being gods; have most likely been misinterpreted and/or exaggerated by future generations, which leads to the term "mythology". There is only 1 god, and that god is God itself (genderless, all-powerful, all-knowing eternal being; compare God & humans, to humans & ants respectively), think about that for awhile
@paradisecityX0 That's a good point. They must have had a beginning like that somehow along history's lines. I think you misjudged me. I am a Christian and I DO know that there is but one God.
Yeah sure, I'm sure that there were leaders who could control lighting. Or come back from the death. Or bend the winds with their spears. Or ride the f*cking sun. I have to say that these 'humans' did more impressive stuff than Jesus. Jesus can walk on water, Poseidon can turn that sea upside-down. God can flood the earth? Zeus beat him by about two centuries mate, and he was smarter than letting 8 people repopulate the earth. Yaweh gets owned ;)
@FireCannon27 God's name is not Yaweh, or Allah or any of the other 72 names; it's GOD. And no, u clearly weren't listening; I said these higher humans must have did stuff (I didn't say for sure) but abilities might have been exaggerated, but they certainly weren't gods. Mythology exaggerates, Christianity reveals the truth. If u don't like it, quit bitching about it & go play atheist somewhere else.
And what's the hint that while people have (either partly or completely) thought up someone who controls water, someone who controls wind, someone who controls lightning, someone who controls life, someone who controls earth, but not someone who does it all at once? A book?
@paradisecityX0 Yaweh's name is not God, or Lord, or any of the other bullshit words Christians turn into proper nouns; it's YAWEH. And no, u clearly aren't intelligent; did stuff is not the proper connotation in that sentence (and vague statements don't make you correct) and every god to exist is better than yours, he's barely even a god. Christianity lies, science reveals the truth. If u don't like it, quit bitching about it ampersand go play christian somewhere else.
Evolution is racist. Tell me, who is more highly evolved, blacks or whites? They can't have evolved over millions of years at the exact same rate. Have you noticed on those artist interpretations of evolutionary progress of man, the final result is always a white guy and two steps back look like a black guy. Personally I believe that all people are CREATED equally and I firmly disagree with the racist views of Darwin and other early 19th century "scientists".
@thegatheringdenver all races are highly evolved. Actually, the very first homo-sapiens originated in Africa, so the first humans were in fact black. And by the way, Darwin was not racist. Derpa Durr
@thegatheringdenver If you're not going to use intelligent thought, why should I? I see no reason to respond to idiotic statements that have been refuted time and time again with logic or reason.
@darkfur35 Yes, the tons of evidence that evolution is fact makes it a fart and the zero evidence that god exists makes it gold. Nice work. You at least contributed to the fact that ignorance is real.
@darkfur35 Religion is a fantasy world. Accept there is no god and that we are all free. Live your life how you wish it to be lived without the fear of a Hell or Heaven in the afterlife. The only evidence Christianity has is the Bible which is not fact, written many years after Jesus' life as a way to give purpose and law to the world. Now we know it to be false and can construct our own society and live in harmony, advancing at each stage of our future.
@darkfur35 Morals were created by people, not religion. Explain why all religions can share some morals. Or how atheists have morals too. It is because PEOPLE choose to accept a better way of living with others. In a harmonious society we would create our own morals for the better of all people.
@darkfur35 Actually YOUR comment doesn’t make sense. You will understand when you proof read it. As for my comment please help me lower my ignorance by explaining why my comment doesn’t make sense. If you have some knowledge that know one has please tell me. If there is evidence of gods existence why does anyone need faith? Please do answer because normally believers try there hardest not to answer any questions I ask. You have the chance to help save me from hell.
Wrong entirely. If a monkey gave birth to a man, creationists would come up with some other bullshit. They would start demanding documentation of a rock turning into a spider or something like that.
@dragonsder lol yep , plus evolution has actually been observed with smaller species that evelove fast in a 100 years or so like that this mexican lizard that migrated to texas and now its different because of the animals that hunt to eat them .
@incredibleufo Evolutionists don't think that. Did you mean creationists? I'm confused.
If a chimp gave birth to a human (assuming it wasn't implanted or something) that would disprove our current theory of evolution. It would mean science got it wrong... very wrong.
Ve never said that one day a monkey pooped a human being as we are now, just like "Bam ! A speaking human coming out of a monkey vagina, that's awesome".
It's a slow evolution, after generations and generations and generations of little evolutions...
n]Notice that the evolutionist seeing a money giving birth to a human being (with an open mind) would just consider it a very funny, very rare coincidence. Don't fail so bad.
Not just very rare: impossible. A modern monkey giving birth to a human would be completely contrary to evolutionary theory. In fact, it would be considered evidence for intentional intervention.
@Noah4543 well i did just learn both of them and the cambrian explosion was a massive move for evolution. oh my bad it was 5 to 10 million years silly me lol
@Noah4543 one more thing the cambrian explosian was a maassive evolution of new life over 70 to 80 million years and remember earth is open and lets that energy escape so the 2nd law is irrelivant to any biology on earth
@Noah4543 2nd law of thermodynamics only works in a completly sealed off place where nothing goes in or out. now since we must have a doctorite on the subject explain the other 3 laws for me please.
@Noah4543 The cambrian explosion does no such thing. Perhaps you should spend more than two minutes on wikipedia. Secondly, the second law of thermodynamics says NOTHING of the sort. I guess you're a troll.
Creationism is a joke. Science is always our best method for discovery. My Atheist friends will enjoy, "Religious Fanatic debates Atheist" on my channel.
@MrKalleJC "the fossil record does not conclusively show any transitional species from one kind of animal evolving into another."
This statement is utterly false, whether you know it or not.
"A shark has always been a shark." Also false. No way a modern shark could breed with a Megalodon from 20 million years ago. Horses and Jackasses are a prime example. They've diverged so far they're almost entirely incapable of producing viable offspring now.
@TomVodkaCollins Could you please back up your statement that my statement is false?
Last time I checked, a Megalodon was a shark. I said "A shark has always been a shark." How is my statement false? Just like small dogs and large dogs can't breed with each other due to their size different? We still consider them dogs. They've diverged so far from a common ancestral kind with all the necessary genes to produce both, yes.
@MrKalleJC I'd suggest you actually check out some scientific papers. There is plenty of evidence that it's pectoral fins were capable of supporting it's weight out of water.
@MrKalleJC "Microevolution by natural selection obviously exists.. What has no evidence is MACROevolution."
How can someone understand how micro-evolution works and not see how it leads directly to macro. How can you not understand that hundreds of thousands of years of tiny changes in populations that become isolated become big changes cumulatively until the two groups can no longer interbreed and then have two separate species? The one follows a direct path of logic to the other.
@MrKalleJC "You are absolutely correct, and what you are describing is microevolutiuon by means of natural selection. No one is arguing against this."
I don't need you to tell me what I was describing. I was doing the describing after all. Actually, lots of people are arguing against natural selection, both micro and macro.
I don't believe in evolution because if evolution happens over millions of years, then shouldn't we find skeletons of evoled creatures? That what i believe, and you talk about what you believe. i am not trying to hate, i am just giving evidence for my blief. And when the whole thing of a monkey birthing a human baby is seen and is proven as a none photoshop, then congrats, evolutionists have discovered CGI.
@dramaticpickles In fact, to their credit, the majority of christians believe in evolution, but *creationists* don't. Not all creationists are Christian - some are muslims, some are jews, but the one thing they have in common is that they are all wrong.
@blindedby2monkeys while i'm not a Christian, it is very easy for someone to interpret the Bible as speaking of an old earth. This is, in fact, what most Catholics already believe. The Pope himself is an evolutionist. Bible is written like a poetry. You can twist and turn the arguments to whatever viewpoint you want it to support.
@Casshyr dude, there are things that might shock you, like the bible says the universe is expanding, just like science, and that 6000 years, our time and Gods time isnt the same, so it would be wrong for a Christian to say the world is 6000 years old, I agree with you on that.
@MrLinkinparkrules Bible also said diseases are caused by demons..and many people still believe in exorcism and a literal Satan..if you are going to trust in information in Bible that is backed up by science, why not just toss away the Bible and trust in science lol
@Casshyr haha no, it doesn't help we argue over something that wont change anything, at the end of it all I will remain a Christian and you an atheist. Will be pointless.
guys, im religious, but i do believe that evelution happens. But Science already prooved that matter cannot be created from nothing, so somthing must have made matter supernaturally. and there is your proof that god created the universe
Ok so we can do that using cloning (look it up its not scify any more.) but that means nothing... so if i see a non science created half man half monkey walking around then ill believe you.
sharkbloodr 2 days ago
does ganja kill god faster? xD guess ill smoke a outher j...
Gannnjjjjjaaaaaaa 3 days ago
LOL Humans didn't come from apes....Apes came from Humans....
unknownhuman1000 3 days ago
have you notice how they say this , yet ALL the species in between are dead... oh my mistake their is one called bigfoot, aboriginies in australia have been around for about 40000 years , why have they not evolved further
sleepup7931 4 days ago
@sleepup7931 wow. That's all I can say. just wow. Your knowledge.
brookcie1 4 days ago
@brookcie1 well you call us crazy and stupid, because we believe in a creator, yet you guys believe that the universe just POPPED into existance,eg if you asked me where did that car from and I said "it just POPPED into existance" you would think i'm crazy, since you guys are SO knowlegable then how did the big bang come into being and why is there NO living proof of ANY of the species between the ape and man
sleepup7931 3 days ago
@sleepup7931 I never called you crazy and stupid, you just assume and I never said anything of what you just blabbered about. My point is that you sound ill educated when you point out an obvious fact that YES, Aboriginals have been around for thousands of year, BUT we (white men/women) have been around for the same amount of time (just on different places). We ARE in the same evolutionary state (about the same place). BTW I am an alternate Christian and believe that GOD made the Big Bang.
brookcie1 2 days ago
@sleepup7931 i was not talking about you ,but the evolutionists , sorry the internet does not translate well
sleepup7931 2 days ago
@sleepup7931 a lot of changes took place. ice age happened.
animaljp3 1 day ago in playlist Liked videos
@animaljp3 well then you donot know much about alligators/ crocodiles then , as the sex of their babies are determine by the temprature and if there was an ice age , then they would have DIED with the dinosaurs , oh and they are reptiles aswell ,so if there was an ice age, they would have DIED
sleepup7931 1 day ago
@sleepup7931 the dinosaurs died before the fucking ice age.
legocontrollerjr 1 day ago 2
@sleepup7931 every heard of something called the south? I hear it is warm there then to.
animaljp3 8 hours ago
@animaljp3 there are crocodiles/ alligators in the north and in the south
sleepup7931 7 hours ago
@sleepup7931 how can you go against the rock scrapings from glaciers in Chicago, and the ice cores that have the temperature of past life?
animaljp3 8 hours ago
@animaljp3 well fromn the fact of a LIVING dinosuar in front of our eye and before you guys start thinking idiot, why donot you check about the life cycle of the crocodile and the alligator , i donot say there was not an ice age but an isolated incedent and not a world wide event
sleepup7931 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is no longer a debate about truth, its about who can win the argument, its just a game and a very boring one at that.
Zwemer100 1 week ago
TROLOLOLOL
NapkinTable 1 week ago
Humans didn't come from monkeys, your a dumbshit.
NapkinTable 1 week ago
@NapkinTable Did you watch the vid?
peronkop 1 week ago
@NapkinTable But apparently trolls came from humans...
jfland20 1 week ago
@NapkinTable Actually, they did. The ancestors of the old world monkeys and by extension the great apes, which includes us, were also monkeys.
tiaxanderson 1 week ago
Comment removed
iseezapie 6 days ago
@NapkinTable You're correct, we came from apes, monkeys have tails =)
iseezapie 6 days ago
Its a matter of faith ether you believe or you dont believe in a creater
Its a matter of faith ether you believe in a universe that according to richard hawkings
sprange out of nothing ...scientific theories are just the same as any other theory
take darkflow/matter,or energy its a matter of faith that these unprovable elements
which bind our universe do exist even though we cant touch smell nor see them
and just like faith in god who we cant see ether you believe oryou dont its up2u !
crazydj59 1 week ago
@crazydj59 what?
peronkop 1 week ago
@paradisecityX0 I dont know if this is sarcasm or not xD but that guy was retarded you must think evolution does exist but not all from monkeys lmao like hippos and whales evolved from the same animal and there is proof did you guys know whales have ankle bones i mean seriously if evolution didnt take place why would a whale even develop them i don't know everything but i can say there is enough evidence to back up evolution i mean people have followed religion for centuries with no proof
drasonrocks 1 week ago
Well said
thegatheringdenver 1 week ago
"even the one time creationists are actually right, theyre, well bugger me- still wrong" Love it!
dancingnancy09 1 week ago
I wonder if anyone has had the idea to teach their kids creation/evolution plus a collection of current counter arguments to each... seeing how things are not always as clear cut as they seem might do wonders for their own empirical abilities.
Regless0000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The "First Awakened Human" In the "Human Race", had to be "Re-engineered" To Have A Proper Biological Mechanism To Enforce The First Law: STRICTLY NO SEX BETWEEN CLOSEST FAMILY MEMBER, There is All SEEING, FEARFUL yet LOVING GOD, If Your Break The Law, You'll be Thrown into the BURNING HELL Literally. Means, There was other "MUCH MORE ADVANCE ENTITY" that GUIDED this The First Awakened Human To Understand the BAD RESULT of Being Forever APE / Primate As "THEY" Want Human..Right?
Ordeal1000 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't Tell me, The "First Awakened Human", In the beginning of "Human Race", had a knowledge in Evolutionary/Revolutionary Biology, made some experiment in Genetic Engineering, Finally, discovered that if SEXUAL ACTIVITY kept on going between closest family member, You all Forever PRIMATE / Monkey. Instead of Obeying The Order of Natural Selection, This Awakened Human made a Revolutionary Movement to Fulfil Natural Selection of The Evolution ??? Please Explain >>>
Ordeal1000 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Info: Neutrally and Without Political Border, We Studied Various Disciplinary such as Physics, Cosmology, Chemistry, Evolutionary/Revolutionary Biology, Recorded History, Geography and so on to be blended, We have implemented the same "Repeatable Proven System" as required by Science, We see Mr Dawkins is SOOOOOOOOOO Outdated/Backward/Stupid for Ignoring the ULTIMATE Role of Evolution Of Languages and Evolution of Religions in The Evolution Of Mankind. For Both That Make Us ALL "HUMAN" Now..
Ordeal1000 2 weeks ago
Why do stupid people always have to rely on non-existant situations as a basis for their argument?
heywtfayla 2 weeks ago
and that kids is why we dont smoke crack
cplandscaping 2 weeks ago
Stop with the goddamn jump cuts!
CopperMilitia 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=6138KRaiJsQ&list=PL0C0D22E7A4243C20&index=1&feature=plcp
ridge400 2 weeks ago
After watching about 10 videos regarding creationism and evolution, i realised evolutionists are stupid. They are clearly smarter and still they arent feeding on the weak minded creationists. Dont treat them as equals, EAT THEM!
nerfedgod 2 weeks ago
You're argument is invalid. You're saying that if a monkey WAS to give birth to a human baby, it would change peoples views. Correct you're there, but seeing a man healing people, walking on water, etc would do the same as well. Really can't we all just get along?
CommanderScarXD 2 weeks ago
@CommanderScarXD But there is no evidence of any of that shit happening? What on earth are you on about?
Of course, we CAN get along. People just need to stop force feeding kids this Creationism shit.
RyanLikesTool 2 weeks ago
@RyanLikesTool >need to stop force feeding kids this Creationism shit
It's funny as hell that you say that, because, when the US was still a primarily Christian country, kids got higher grades :D
chavezery09 2 weeks ago
@chavezery09 That doesn't mean anything? Besides, the US was founded upon secularism. Believing in creationism is the acceptance of something fallacious. Why would you teach kids that?
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@RyanLikesTool “America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.” - Joseph Stalin
The entire movement of the separation of church and state happened because of that quote, communists wanted to rule over us. If you want further proof of that, read "The Naked Communist."
Also, explain one way that creationism is fallacious.
chavezery09 1 week ago
@chavezery09 No, your country's founders consisted of secularists. They didn't at any point say that America was a Christian country. Just because it was emphasized later on that America isn't a Christian nation wasn't to say that it ever was in the first place. Because I assure you that believers in different religions would still have been present at the time. And one way that creationism is fallacious? Because there is no evidence to show that the universe had a divine creator. It fills gaps.
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@RyanLikesTool Sure, it wasn't created with only Christians, but it was primarily Christian and founded by people who wanted us to maintain Christian morals.
And htere is a lot of evidence that shows the universe has a divine creator, you apparently haven't seen much in this world.
chavezery09 1 week ago
@chavezery09 It was still made a secular country from the beginning though, meaning that you were allowed to have your own beliefs. Religion was man-made, meaning that morals were also exactly that. It would be an insult to say that we wouldn't have any decent governing system, or any decent law system without religion.
And actually, no there is NONE to show that the universe has a divine creator. In fact, it's quite an ignorant suggestion to say that it does.
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@chavezery09 If you were to bring the cosmological, teleological, moral arguments into play here, I'd definitely warn you not to. Although, the world does show things that are only apparent to us as intelligently designed, this is only because that is the way we think. We could not deem anything natural to be intelligently designed because we'd only be doing so on the basis that things in our world are designed.
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@chavezery09 And even though the world may appear to have order, even our solar system appears to have an extremely intricate order: this does not mean that there was intelligent structure behind that order. It is only because we intelligently order things ourselves that, once again, we assume all complex things that appear to be in order, intelligently structured.
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@chavezery09 I could go onto movement, causation, necessity, degree, etc. But it's plainly obvious. Just because we assume things to be created intelligently (because we intelligently create things ourselves) does not mean that they really are intelligently created.
RyanLikesTool 1 week ago
@chavezery09 "The entire movement of the separation of church and state happened because of that quote"
huh? What does the First Amendment have to do with Stalin?
"explain one way that creationism is fallacious."
The facts and evidence of evolution. But by all means, if you want to believe in creationism, please explain the genius of my appendix. Or for that matter, explain the purpose of wisdom teeth from a creationist perspective.
TheHigherVoltage 1 week ago
@TheHigherVoltage No one really complained about the separation of church and state before Stalin made that quote -- Communists started to try to take over the country after he said that. (Read: The Naked Communist)
Also, evolution? You're kidding me, right?
That thing that even Charles Darwin didn't really believe in?
Apparently you don't know the difference between abiogenesis and micro-evolution, because abiogenesis has been proven wrong time and time again. (Look it up)
chavezery09 1 week ago
@chavezery09 Abiogenesis has yet to be proven wrong. You might as well be in the 19th century claiming 'manned flight has been proven wrong time and time again!' Just because something hasn't been figured out, doesn't mean it's been proven wrong.
If you think evolution is wrong, next time you get an infection, don't take modern meds - they are all now developed on our understanding of evolution. Pray for healing. Jesus said that'll work. And Jesus wasn't a liar was he?
TheHigherVoltage 1 week ago
2nd Human chromosome contains centralised teleomeres, showing that a fusion of the simian 2nd and 3rd chromosomes took place.
This is SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE of humanity's kinship with the great apes in particular the Bunobo Chimpanzee.
Given our facial structure also, it seems our heads stay in a "juvenile" bone structure, our jaw never moves as far forward as it does in adult great apes but is very comparable in structure to that of any juvenile great ape
Just look at a baby chimp.
AngryBugger2012 2 weeks ago
@DeZoneGaming you are a fucking retard lmao xD
drasonrocks 2 weeks ago
@drasonrocks That was a very explanable response, really dignified and accurate :)
paradisecityX0 2 weeks ago
So did monkeys also give birth to dogs, cats, birds, fish, tigers, lions, if monkeys gave birth to only Humans, then where did all the other animals come from, huh?
DeZoneGaming 2 weeks ago
@DeZoneGaming your a fucking moron
thesharptoe 2 weeks ago
@thesharptoe doesn't answer his question, where DID all the animals come from? :)
paradisecityX0 2 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 noahs ark! :D
OmfgItsHenu 2 weeks ago
@OmfgItsHenu What about Noah's Ark?
paradisecityX0 2 weeks ago
@DeZoneGaming Dogs. Dogs are the original non-human species. Look it up. You can find it at 1-800-382-5968 (props to anyone who gets this).
theevilgood 2 weeks ago
@theevilgood haha
TheStJames23 2 weeks ago
@DeZoneGaming We are in the same genetic family as apes, monkeys, ect. We were never "monkeys" but were once an even more closely related humanoid species which mutated into humans. Also bear in mind that different locations, climates, altitudes, ect. are all developing factors that determined these different species. Birds were once aquatic creatures and they grow gills in the womb (of which fall off before birth). There is evidence everywhere, you're just a moron.
metaldorksforever666 2 weeks ago
Bubbles the chimp could give birth to Richard Dawkins, three elephants and a ready-cooked lobster. Creationists would still manage to rationalise it into supporting their dogmas.
NevilleRhysBarnes 2 weeks ago
He's superhands from peep show
KoRL12 3 weeks ago
@Coughlan616 your just about the dumbest idiot I have ever heard. Monkeys became humans apparently because a mutation in the gene pool caused one of the apes to give birth to a hairless offspring, which mated with other apes, birthing more hairless primates, who continued this, birthing a couple of them with larger brains, also a mutation, and then we eventually evolved into what we are today.
goo5976 3 weeks ago
@goo5976
Not hairless, you do not understand evolution at all you silly heretic (trying to prove something that requires faith is a religious heresy), slightly less hair, if this is advantages then this mutation is passed on, later on down the line slightly larger brains, and so on a so forth etc etc etc
BetaGame73 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 And one more thing, we have GENES that are only activated under certain conditions, we've only scratched the surface of how we can observe and use the human genome, this means that during a single creatures lifetime they can adapt to the environment, and yet one more FUCKING thing, religion/morals/technology are the product of an advanced society, you no longer have to forage and hurt for food spending all your time if survival, this allows religion, not silly ideas of an ignorant human
BetaGame73 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 riiiight, ape-men with larger brains filled with a bunch of hot air. says the kid who relies on evolution. oh wait, dogs evolved from rocks 0.0
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 i never said i believed it, chill out. i gave a theory.
goo5976 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 Chill out? I'm perfectly calm :) It's atheists that can't stand to be proven wrong, so they use scientific evidence (not perfect, need I remind u), a bunch of blasphemous insults, and...THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER defense :o
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 who cares. i cant save the world. i can only save myself. we wont know until we check out what the truth is.
goo5976 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 And if u die and wake up in a hideous, all-negative universe (chained, scorching 3rd degree fire, raining sufur, the sound of childrens' screams, clenching of teeth, ur worst fears and nightmares a reality, the smell of burning/dead flesh...all for eternity), would u actually risk that for the sake of ur ego? I want u to think about that and be serious for once.
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 your legitimately starting to piss me off. you keep giving judgemental statements. whos to say im not serious? you? someone who doesnt know me? nah. i dont try to be a good person. i just do what i think is right as much as i can. meaning i believe in karma. i dont feel like hearing about all this right now.
goo5976 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 U believe in karma? Well it's gonna be a bitch to u (especially all the retarded blasphemous babble u spew out)
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 FUCK OFF BITCH.
goo5976 3 weeks ago
@goo5976 That was a very mature response, good job :)
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
prove it
thegatheringdenver 1 week ago
there is one argument that creationists continue to pose and its that the pre-cambrian fossil forms don't have any common ancestors.they literally pop out of nowhere w/ nothing to link them back.. However, it could be that those ancestors of the forms in the pre-cambrian era have not been found, or may be destroyed For those of you out there that do believe in God and find it hard to w/ the theory of evolution no that the bible cannot be completely true.. it was written by people not God himself
late2ourfuneral 3 weeks ago
Ahhh you Creationalists... Your religion will soon disappear... just like every other Religion that came before has disappeared! Just ask Thor, or Apollo, or ... you get my point.
“Scientists love mysteries. They love not knowing. That’s the key part of science; the excitement of learning about the universe… … …
This is so different than the sterile aspect of religion, where the excitement is apparently knowing everything; although clearly knowing nothing.”
-Lawrence Krauss
PietriGuitars 3 weeks ago
@PietriGuitars Why is it always Thor? Some of the Isaac Newton and Galileo were creation scientists. Where would science be without them?
ajesusfreak1 3 weeks ago
@ajesusfreak1 Jupiter, Minerva, Juno, Anubis, etc. must have been powerful ppl (leaders, rulers, higher humans maybe), but nowhere close to being gods; have most likely been misinterpreted and/or exaggerated by future generations, which leads to the term "mythology". There is only 1 god, and that god is God itself (genderless, all-powerful, all-knowing eternal being; compare God & humans, to humans & ants respectively), think about that for awhile
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 That's a good point. They must have had a beginning like that somehow along history's lines. I think you misjudged me. I am a Christian and I DO know that there is but one God.
ajesusfreak1 3 weeks ago
@ajesusfreak1 wrong person, sry
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 It's all good.
ajesusfreak1 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0
Yeah sure, I'm sure that there were leaders who could control lighting. Or come back from the death. Or bend the winds with their spears. Or ride the f*cking sun. I have to say that these 'humans' did more impressive stuff than Jesus. Jesus can walk on water, Poseidon can turn that sea upside-down. God can flood the earth? Zeus beat him by about two centuries mate, and he was smarter than letting 8 people repopulate the earth. Yaweh gets owned ;)
FireCannon27 3 weeks ago
@FireCannon27 God's name is not Yaweh, or Allah or any of the other 72 names; it's GOD. And no, u clearly weren't listening; I said these higher humans must have did stuff (I didn't say for sure) but abilities might have been exaggerated, but they certainly weren't gods. Mythology exaggerates, Christianity reveals the truth. If u don't like it, quit bitching about it & go play atheist somewhere else.
paradisecityX0 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0
And what's the hint that while people have (either partly or completely) thought up someone who controls water, someone who controls wind, someone who controls lightning, someone who controls life, someone who controls earth, but not someone who does it all at once? A book?
FireCannon27 3 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 Yaweh's name is not God, or Lord, or any of the other bullshit words Christians turn into proper nouns; it's YAWEH. And no, u clearly aren't intelligent; did stuff is not the proper connotation in that sentence (and vague statements don't make you correct) and every god to exist is better than yours, he's barely even a god. Christianity lies, science reveals the truth. If u don't like it, quit bitching about it ampersand go play christian somewhere else.
theevilgood 2 weeks ago
@theevilgood I'm sorry u feel that way :)
paradisecityX0 2 weeks ago
@paradisecityX0 You should be. No cower before my unending might!
theevilgood 1 week ago
Evolution is racist. Tell me, who is more highly evolved, blacks or whites? They can't have evolved over millions of years at the exact same rate. Have you noticed on those artist interpretations of evolutionary progress of man, the final result is always a white guy and two steps back look like a black guy. Personally I believe that all people are CREATED equally and I firmly disagree with the racist views of Darwin and other early 19th century "scientists".
thegatheringdenver 4 weeks ago
@thegatheringdenver all races are highly evolved. Actually, the very first homo-sapiens originated in Africa, so the first humans were in fact black. And by the way, Darwin was not racist. Derpa Durr
AtheistGamer4 4 weeks ago 2
@thegatheringdenver I find your lack of sense disturbing.
theevilgood 1 week ago
because you can't answer with logic you use insults. Epic Fail!
thegatheringdenver 1 week ago
@thegatheringdenver If you're not going to use intelligent thought, why should I? I see no reason to respond to idiotic statements that have been refuted time and time again with logic or reason.
theevilgood 1 week ago
no one claims that humans are descended from chimps or any other living mammal. but we are cousins with them
benjy4770 4 weeks ago 2
evolution is a farce, I mean fart.
darkfur35 4 weeks ago
@darkfur35 Yes, the tons of evidence that evolution is fact makes it a fart and the zero evidence that god exists makes it gold. Nice work. You at least contributed to the fact that ignorance is real.
A55TRICKY 4 weeks ago
@A55TRICKY Comment doesnt make any sense.... sounds like your living in a fantasy world. Your contributing to the fact that ignorance is real.
darkfur35 4 weeks ago
@darkfur35 Religion is a fantasy world. Accept there is no god and that we are all free. Live your life how you wish it to be lived without the fear of a Hell or Heaven in the afterlife. The only evidence Christianity has is the Bible which is not fact, written many years after Jesus' life as a way to give purpose and law to the world. Now we know it to be false and can construct our own society and live in harmony, advancing at each stage of our future.
hmeoscar 4 weeks ago
@hmeoscar Live in harmony in a society with no moral code.....that is a crazy fantasy.
darkfur35 4 weeks ago
@darkfur35 Morals were created by people, not religion. Explain why all religions can share some morals. Or how atheists have morals too. It is because PEOPLE choose to accept a better way of living with others. In a harmonious society we would create our own morals for the better of all people.
hmeoscar 4 weeks ago
@darkfur35 Actually YOUR comment doesn’t make sense. You will understand when you proof read it. As for my comment please help me lower my ignorance by explaining why my comment doesn’t make sense. If you have some knowledge that know one has please tell me. If there is evidence of gods existence why does anyone need faith? Please do answer because normally believers try there hardest not to answer any questions I ask. You have the chance to help save me from hell.
A55TRICKY 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Religion is like a penis,
it's fine to have one, it's fine to be proud of it,
but don't whip it out in public and start waving it about
and dont shove it down children's throats...
N1Kburchy 4 weeks ago
you cant break down the theory of evolution to a monkey gving birth to a human.
erti655 1 month ago
Wrong entirely. If a monkey gave birth to a man, creationists would come up with some other bullshit. They would start demanding documentation of a rock turning into a spider or something like that.
dragonsder 1 month ago
@dragonsder lol yep , plus evolution has actually been observed with smaller species that evelove fast in a 100 years or so like that this mexican lizard that migrated to texas and now its different because of the animals that hunt to eat them .
erti655 1 month ago
Because evolutionists think the jump from chimp to homo sapiens sapiens happened in nine months...
incredibleufo 1 month ago
@incredibleufo Evolutionists don't think that. Did you mean creationists? I'm confused.
If a chimp gave birth to a human (assuming it wasn't implanted or something) that would disprove our current theory of evolution. It would mean science got it wrong... very wrong.
rusman74x 4 weeks ago
@rusman74x That was the point I was trying to make. Of course evolution doesn't believe that. ;)
incredibleufo 3 weeks ago
@incredibleufo My bad. I guess I misread your comment. ^_^ peace
rusman74x 3 weeks ago
Lol.
Ve never said that one day a monkey pooped a human being as we are now, just like "Bam ! A speaking human coming out of a monkey vagina, that's awesome".
It's a slow evolution, after generations and generations and generations of little evolutions...
ro1ri 1 month ago
n]Notice that the evolutionist seeing a money giving birth to a human being (with an open mind) would just consider it a very funny, very rare coincidence. Don't fail so bad.
CodePZ 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CodePZ
"very rare"
Not just very rare: impossible. A modern monkey giving birth to a human would be completely contrary to evolutionary theory. In fact, it would be considered evidence for intentional intervention.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
A monkeys DNA is 60% congruent to that of a banana
StickyNinja1 1 month ago
@wey2xplusottjust4U because it does not reflect wavelengths
animaljp3 1 month ago
@wey2xplusottjust4U how did a cell come together?
animaljp3 1 month ago
@wey2xplusottjust4U protein chains from where? the earth!
animaljp3 1 month ago
@wey2xplusottjust4U both are right
animaljp3 1 month ago
I'm a creationist, and I don't agree with that "common" creationist argument
TheMrflutterguy 1 month ago
@wey2xplusottjust4U science says people are from the earth too. What weird religion do you belive in?
animaljp3 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
@Noah4543 Yes, I can quite believe perpetual motion is impossible. But that has nothing to do with anything I'm afraid :)
I'm also afraid that the Cambrian explosion really isn't a bombshell.
1992jamo 1 month ago
I did not see any evidence that is in this video.
DerektheDuctTape 1 month ago
@Noah4543 well i did just learn both of them and the cambrian explosion was a massive move for evolution. oh my bad it was 5 to 10 million years silly me lol
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
@Noah4543 one more thing the cambrian explosian was a maassive evolution of new life over 70 to 80 million years and remember earth is open and lets that energy escape so the 2nd law is irrelivant to any biology on earth
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
@Noah4543 2nd law of thermodynamics only works in a completly sealed off place where nothing goes in or out. now since we must have a doctorite on the subject explain the other 3 laws for me please.
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
@Noah4543 The cambrian explosion does no such thing. Perhaps you should spend more than two minutes on wikipedia. Secondly, the second law of thermodynamics says NOTHING of the sort. I guess you're a troll.
1992jamo 1 month ago
Creationism is a joke. Science is always our best method for discovery. My Atheist friends will enjoy, "Religious Fanatic debates Atheist" on my channel.
Sweence 1 month ago
neither religion nor evolution can provide any REAL evidence that either one is right. nomatter what the arguement you still cant prove your right
MrClinton19 1 month ago
lol awesome hilarious
zdunichme 1 month ago
@MrKalleJC "the fossil record does not conclusively show any transitional species from one kind of animal evolving into another."
This statement is utterly false, whether you know it or not.
"A shark has always been a shark." Also false. No way a modern shark could breed with a Megalodon from 20 million years ago. Horses and Jackasses are a prime example. They've diverged so far they're almost entirely incapable of producing viable offspring now.
TomVodkaCollins 1 month ago
@TomVodkaCollins Could you please back up your statement that my statement is false?
Last time I checked, a Megalodon was a shark. I said "A shark has always been a shark." How is my statement false? Just like small dogs and large dogs can't breed with each other due to their size different? We still consider them dogs. They've diverged so far from a common ancestral kind with all the necessary genes to produce both, yes.
MrKalleJC 1 month ago
@MrKalleJC Tiktaalik is an example of a transitional form.
Creationist Crap debunked!!!
atheistram 1 month ago
@atheistram Tiktaalik was a fish. There is nothing to prove that its pectoral fins were capable of supporting its weight out of water. Try again.
MrKalleJC 1 month ago
@MrKalleJC I'd suggest you actually check out some scientific papers. There is plenty of evidence that it's pectoral fins were capable of supporting it's weight out of water.
atheistram 4 weeks ago
@atheistram Which scientific papers? Please point me to a few.
MrKalleJC 4 weeks ago
@MrKalleJC
if you are not prepared to read up to back up arguments do not start them, a fool is what you are
BetaGame73 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrKalleJC "Microevolution by natural selection obviously exists.. What has no evidence is MACROevolution."
How can someone understand how micro-evolution works and not see how it leads directly to macro. How can you not understand that hundreds of thousands of years of tiny changes in populations that become isolated become big changes cumulatively until the two groups can no longer interbreed and then have two separate species? The one follows a direct path of logic to the other.
TomVodkaCollins 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrKalleJC "You are absolutely correct, and what you are describing is microevolutiuon by means of natural selection. No one is arguing against this."
I don't need you to tell me what I was describing. I was doing the describing after all. Actually, lots of people are arguing against natural selection, both micro and macro.
TomVodkaCollins 1 month ago
I don't believe in evolution because if evolution happens over millions of years, then shouldn't we find skeletons of evoled creatures? That what i believe, and you talk about what you believe. i am not trying to hate, i am just giving evidence for my blief. And when the whole thing of a monkey birthing a human baby is seen and is proven as a none photoshop, then congrats, evolutionists have discovered CGI.
LOTRFANO8 1 month ago
@LOTRFANO8 "Skeletons of evolved creatures"? Do you mean skeletons of our ancestors and species which are long extinct? Guess what: We got 'em.
CruzzioXT 1 month ago
@CruzzioXT Oh realy. Then show me a skeleton of a fish with legs.
LOTRFANO8 1 month ago
@LOTRFANO8 I'm afraid I'm talking to one.
CruzzioXT 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOTRFANO8
"shouldn't we find skeletons of evoled creatures?"
We do.
"a monkey birthing a human baby"
Which is not what evolutionary theory claims. If anything, seeing such a thing would *disprove* evolutionary theory, not prove it.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The bible very clearly promotes slavery. We are obviously reverting back to the stone age with our anti-slavery ways, right?
And if you don't follow everything the bible says, then you are going to hell because you are not following gods word.
niren6910 1 month ago
Comment removed
hihosilver666 1 month ago
Dude, there are many Christians who believe in evolution okay? Its not like against our faith or anything...
dramaticpickles 1 month ago
@dramaticpickles In fact, to their credit, the majority of christians believe in evolution, but *creationists* don't. Not all creationists are Christian - some are muslims, some are jews, but the one thing they have in common is that they are all wrong.
GrumpyOldJim 1 month ago
@dramaticpickles LOLWHAT? how can you believe in the bible=6000 years at the same time as evolution=millions of years?
blindedby2monkeys 1 month ago
@blindedby2monkeys while i'm not a Christian, it is very easy for someone to interpret the Bible as speaking of an old earth. This is, in fact, what most Catholics already believe. The Pope himself is an evolutionist. Bible is written like a poetry. You can twist and turn the arguments to whatever viewpoint you want it to support.
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr You cant trust the pope dude.
MrLinkinparkrules 1 month ago
@MrLinkinparkrules Right...i should listen to the people who don't have science education and think world is 6000 years old...
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr dude, there are things that might shock you, like the bible says the universe is expanding, just like science, and that 6000 years, our time and Gods time isnt the same, so it would be wrong for a Christian to say the world is 6000 years old, I agree with you on that.
MrLinkinparkrules 1 month ago
@MrLinkinparkrules Bible also said diseases are caused by demons..and many people still believe in exorcism and a literal Satan..if you are going to trust in information in Bible that is backed up by science, why not just toss away the Bible and trust in science lol
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr Haha no, I believe in God, always will dude. Well good luck with what it is that your doing.
MrLinkinparkrules 1 month ago
@MrLinkinparkrules lol sound like you ran out of arguments...but whatever, good luck to you too.
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr haha no, it doesn't help we argue over something that wont change anything, at the end of it all I will remain a Christian and you an atheist. Will be pointless.
MrLinkinparkrules 1 month ago
@MrLinkinparkrules I KNEW IT. You falsely presume I'm an atheist simply because I don't believe in your Bible. That's pretty arrogant of you.
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr Haha Im sorry dude, then what are you?
MrLinkinparkrules 1 month ago
@Casshyr Where in the Bible does it say that? -OR- Where the bloody hell do you get your info?
LOTRFANO8 1 month ago
Fantastic
8Rincewind 1 month ago in playlist Watch Later 2
God is going to punish everybody who talks trash about him... don't say I didn't warn you!
FalconFastest123 1 month ago
@FalconFastest123 Gods a prick?
MrDeano258 1 month ago
@FalconFastest123 Dude calm down! No he aint! I am pretty sure He says stuff about forgiving? =s you are the reason people hate christians!
MyBlastoiseIsBigger 1 month ago
im a Christian....but this video is awesome!
KeswickCamp08 1 month ago
guys, im religious, but i do believe that evelution happens. But Science already prooved that matter cannot be created from nothing, so somthing must have made matter supernaturally. and there is your proof that god created the universe
IRISHDRUNK1243 1 month ago