nayder seems like a good man, but what are his true intentions? honestly, would an independent or other 3rd party candidate really make that much of a difference if elected?
ralph nader should just quit trying to be the president....man how many times has he tried 4...5? he's too paranoid...but i guess GM is responsible for that
are you trying to say Nader wouldn't be ten thousand 8 hundred ninety nine million times better then bush or from the get go barack you should give your head a shake cause this guy has been fighting for you for his entire life and has saved countless lives with his efforts what did BUSH do I think he knows how to kill ppl
Don't get me wrong...I've read about his efforts. This man is a symbol of ABSOLUTE dedication, but there's no way he will ever get elected unless hes part of the democratic or republican party, which hes not willing to do. Independent candidates will never get elected. I do agree that a monkey can do a better job than Bush haha
The lord works in mysterious ways, free will can be a bitch, but eventually all tyrannts have to meet thier maker.Sometimes in life tyrannts do get caught in their tracks like hitler, milosovich, saddam hussein, mousolini, the sicilian mafia, just a few but those tyrannts thought they were invincible and look what happened to them, time will tell. Dont underestimate God, he can take out any tyrannt as easy as he can let them rise to power with his "free will". Again, free will can be a bitch.
Suggested reading: "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi. Don't let the criminal slip away to a cozy Crawford unaccountable, nor his sidekick either--although it's very questionable who is the sidekick and who's been the one doing most of the kicking.
There are times when there is justification for going to war, but there was no justification for the war in Iraq. The Bush administration manipulated evidence and the media to falsely convince everyone that we needed to invade Iraq, and they ignored options to avoid an invasion. They wanted war no matter what and caused, unimaginable to you, death, destruction, and suffering. An impeachment might have brought out the truths. Go tell the dead Iraqis and US soldiers why they needed to die.
If Saddam was not allowing UN inspectors full access to his country, who could trust him with his history?
How about instead of focusing on Bush, you call for the impeachment of all the senators who voted for the war for getting caught up in the frenzy and not examining the evidence hard enough?
You need to look at the "evidence" presented to the Congress, which few in Congress actually read, but which was manipulated by the Bush Administration to make speculation appear as fact, and which denied the overwhelming existence of contrary argument. Bush wanted to go to war no matter what, including no matter what evidence. Bush and his man on a leash, George Tenet, drew smoke where there was no fire, and yelled fire, but if you want to impeach your congressman for same, more power to you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Does it matter if it was biased? Even if evidence seemed shakey, shouldn't it be the responsibility of congress to be more observant? As far as intelligence failures go, they happen throughout American history. Are you going to impeach the president every time they happen? Aren't the ones who actually got false information more to blame than the boss?
Does it matter if it was biased?!!!! I think it matters to the hundreds of thousands dead, even more wounded, millions displaced, a trillion dollar added to the U.S. bankruptcy, and the rest of the world's opinion of us. I don't argue against you about Congress's behavior, but you really need to get informed about how things transpired. The book I cite is a good place to go. PBS's Frontline site has some easy shows to watch. This was not just bad intel!!! This was deception and coercion on high.
The intel didn't need to be accurate, it just needed to be convenient, and if it wasn't convenient, then it was discarded, or transformed. For the Bush presidency, the buck not only didn't stop there, the lies didn't either.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm not doubting it was faulty, I'm saying that a lot of people are saying to go after Bush, but for what? He wanted a war and he used intelligence to support it, if the senators fail to see any flaws in it then it should be their mistake, they initiated the war, not Bush.
Congress approved support for the war. Bush initiated it. The way the intel system is setup in this case, Congress was only privy to intel provided by, and most importantly, worded by the executive branch. The Constitution says impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. If pushing our whole nation into an unjustified invasion of another nation through the manipulation of evidence and the manipulation of the media is not a high crime, then we are not a free nation protected from tyranny.
If you want to implicate that majority in Congress, be my guest, and most of the media as well, both of which failed us miserably. But if you imply that the checks against the presidency are sufficient to pardon any presidential ambition like this, no matter how reckless and dishonest, then you are being very naive. Yes, the whole system has a great dysfunction, and maybe most especially the relationship of the intel services with Congress, but Bush here used his powers to commit a high crime.
read the constitution loon, something you republicans wouldnt know anything about, only congress has the power to declare war NOT the president. fuckin faggot ass republican.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're a fucking idiot. I just said Congress started the war. The President waged the war because he's fucking COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the military. Go sodomize your hippie ass some more, bitch.
holy shit you are a faggot! I bet you have a poster of W.M.D Bush and Richard Dick head Cheney in your bedroom. snapping your carrot to them. must suck being a virgin that plays video games all day long huh?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Maybe I do, because they're the kinds of guys who don't take shit from anyone and actually have the balls to do something about terrorism. I don't know about "snapping carrots" sport, but I'm sure you wank your limp little dick to Hillary Clinton's thighs. I think you'll find that in the real world people don't live in their parents' basement, so not everybody is a virgin and plays video games all day like you. I'm sure it does suck, though.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fuck you man, im republican and i carry a pocket constitution.
but i also voted for ron paul.
either way, fuck you obamanazi, have fun killing your grandparents with your hitleresque healthcare system. and have fun with costly and ineffective technologies like "green energy" that only came about because of a fake problem.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i guess we should never go against anything in the consititution, no matter how severe the situation? dipshit
what would you do if you were president and thought a country that threatened you was trying to get WMD, dumbfuck.
Maybe thats why Bush was elected TWICE. Cus hes smarter than Gore, Kerry and Obama combined. He takes national security and peopels lifes seriously, unlike you dumb fucking democrats who just need your don't want to pay for the war cus ur too par and need a welfare check.
The fact that Bush and Cheney have not been impeached and convicted will go down as one of the saddest silences in American history. Our Congress does not serve and protect the American people. They are all spineless except the few who bring up impeaching the two criminals at the top. Either spineless, or blind.
Go Ralph!
RDKF13 1 year ago
nayder seems like a good man, but what are his true intentions? honestly, would an independent or other 3rd party candidate really make that much of a difference if elected?
666bushisnazi666 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
U are a monkey.
luismartinez1091 2 years ago
Yes. Because the Democrats and Republicans are both Centre parties supported by corporate power.
Nader is neither.
Ohloveeh 2 years ago 2
ralph nader should just quit trying to be the president....man how many times has he tried 4...5? he's too paranoid...but i guess GM is responsible for that
peggysue42 2 years ago
are you trying to say Nader wouldn't be ten thousand 8 hundred ninety nine million times better then bush or from the get go barack you should give your head a shake cause this guy has been fighting for you for his entire life and has saved countless lives with his efforts what did BUSH do I think he knows how to kill ppl
fuckthisshitfuckit 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong...I've read about his efforts. This man is a symbol of ABSOLUTE dedication, but there's no way he will ever get elected unless hes part of the democratic or republican party, which hes not willing to do. Independent candidates will never get elected. I do agree that a monkey can do a better job than Bush haha
peggysue42 2 years ago
thats all i'm saying is a vote for anybody but nader is a wasted vote even if he has no chance
fuckthisshitfuckit 2 years ago
U are an inferior creature of intelligence
luismartinez1091 2 years ago
why do you say that?
peggysue42 2 years ago
Bushgates
ReX342 2 years ago
tryptala you are so right...we need Americans to go after Bush...he can't hide to a cozy Crawford...please don't let it happen!
johnq13 3 years ago
The lord works in mysterious ways, free will can be a bitch, but eventually all tyrannts have to meet thier maker.Sometimes in life tyrannts do get caught in their tracks like hitler, milosovich, saddam hussein, mousolini, the sicilian mafia, just a few but those tyrannts thought they were invincible and look what happened to them, time will tell. Dont underestimate God, he can take out any tyrannt as easy as he can let them rise to power with his "free will". Again, free will can be a bitch.
HealingVibrations 3 years ago
IMPEACH!
ssips720 3 years ago
Suggested reading: "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi. Don't let the criminal slip away to a cozy Crawford unaccountable, nor his sidekick either--although it's very questionable who is the sidekick and who's been the one doing most of the kicking.
tryptala 3 years ago
so we should prosecute every president who's ever waged a war?
Albyiscool 2 years ago
There are times when there is justification for going to war, but there was no justification for the war in Iraq. The Bush administration manipulated evidence and the media to falsely convince everyone that we needed to invade Iraq, and they ignored options to avoid an invasion. They wanted war no matter what and caused, unimaginable to you, death, destruction, and suffering. An impeachment might have brought out the truths. Go tell the dead Iraqis and US soldiers why they needed to die.
tryptala 2 years ago 3
If Saddam was not allowing UN inspectors full access to his country, who could trust him with his history?
How about instead of focusing on Bush, you call for the impeachment of all the senators who voted for the war for getting caught up in the frenzy and not examining the evidence hard enough?
Albyiscool 2 years ago
You need to look at the "evidence" presented to the Congress, which few in Congress actually read, but which was manipulated by the Bush Administration to make speculation appear as fact, and which denied the overwhelming existence of contrary argument. Bush wanted to go to war no matter what, including no matter what evidence. Bush and his man on a leash, George Tenet, drew smoke where there was no fire, and yelled fire, but if you want to impeach your congressman for same, more power to you.
tryptala 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does it matter if it was biased? Even if evidence seemed shakey, shouldn't it be the responsibility of congress to be more observant? As far as intelligence failures go, they happen throughout American history. Are you going to impeach the president every time they happen? Aren't the ones who actually got false information more to blame than the boss?
Albyiscool 2 years ago
Does it matter if it was biased?!!!! I think it matters to the hundreds of thousands dead, even more wounded, millions displaced, a trillion dollar added to the U.S. bankruptcy, and the rest of the world's opinion of us. I don't argue against you about Congress's behavior, but you really need to get informed about how things transpired. The book I cite is a good place to go. PBS's Frontline site has some easy shows to watch. This was not just bad intel!!! This was deception and coercion on high.
tryptala 2 years ago 6
The intel didn't need to be accurate, it just needed to be convenient, and if it wasn't convenient, then it was discarded, or transformed. For the Bush presidency, the buck not only didn't stop there, the lies didn't either.
tryptala 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm not doubting it was faulty, I'm saying that a lot of people are saying to go after Bush, but for what? He wanted a war and he used intelligence to support it, if the senators fail to see any flaws in it then it should be their mistake, they initiated the war, not Bush.
Albyiscool 2 years ago
Congress approved support for the war. Bush initiated it. The way the intel system is setup in this case, Congress was only privy to intel provided by, and most importantly, worded by the executive branch. The Constitution says impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. If pushing our whole nation into an unjustified invasion of another nation through the manipulation of evidence and the manipulation of the media is not a high crime, then we are not a free nation protected from tyranny.
tryptala 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It was started, initiated, by congress, since no military action could be carried out otherwise. Bush waged it as commander in chief.
If you cannot be convinced that congress is at fault, then we have probably reached an impasse.
Albyiscool 2 years ago
If you want to implicate that majority in Congress, be my guest, and most of the media as well, both of which failed us miserably. But if you imply that the checks against the presidency are sufficient to pardon any presidential ambition like this, no matter how reckless and dishonest, then you are being very naive. Yes, the whole system has a great dysfunction, and maybe most especially the relationship of the intel services with Congress, but Bush here used his powers to commit a high crime.
tryptala 2 years ago 4
read the constitution loon, something you republicans wouldnt know anything about, only congress has the power to declare war NOT the president. fuckin faggot ass republican.
DestructerX 2 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're a fucking idiot. I just said Congress started the war. The President waged the war because he's fucking COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the military. Go sodomize your hippie ass some more, bitch.
Albyiscool 2 years ago
holy shit you are a faggot! I bet you have a poster of W.M.D Bush and Richard Dick head Cheney in your bedroom. snapping your carrot to them. must suck being a virgin that plays video games all day long huh?
DestructerX 2 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maybe I do, because they're the kinds of guys who don't take shit from anyone and actually have the balls to do something about terrorism. I don't know about "snapping carrots" sport, but I'm sure you wank your limp little dick to Hillary Clinton's thighs. I think you'll find that in the real world people don't live in their parents' basement, so not everybody is a virgin and plays video games all day like you. I'm sure it does suck, though.
Albyiscool 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck you man, im republican and i carry a pocket constitution.
but i also voted for ron paul.
either way, fuck you obamanazi, have fun killing your grandparents with your hitleresque healthcare system. and have fun with costly and ineffective technologies like "green energy" that only came about because of a fake problem.
ekjohnson9 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i guess we should never go against anything in the consititution, no matter how severe the situation? dipshit
what would you do if you were president and thought a country that threatened you was trying to get WMD, dumbfuck.
Maybe thats why Bush was elected TWICE. Cus hes smarter than Gore, Kerry and Obama combined. He takes national security and peopels lifes seriously, unlike you dumb fucking democrats who just need your don't want to pay for the war cus ur too par and need a welfare check.
JMS13579 2 years ago
@DestructerX obama didn't get a declaration of war from congress to bomb libya. faggot.
goblue122394 9 months ago
The fact that Bush and Cheney have not been impeached and convicted will go down as one of the saddest silences in American history. Our Congress does not serve and protect the American people. They are all spineless except the few who bring up impeaching the two criminals at the top. Either spineless, or blind.
tryptala 3 years ago 2