This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Is that it?!?! LoL directx10 is still way behind PS3 then...and a PS3 costs 20% price of a PoS PC capable of running GTA 4/Dirt 2 lol you fanboys crack me up :)
@MadCommodore You're an idiot, this guy has a terrible computer and you think it's bad, watch call of duty 5 on highest settings on my channel, then you'll see that your pathetic PS3 "games" aren't good at all.
Intel and AMD make CPUs. nVidia and ATI make chipsets for motherboards as well as GPUs. Intel sometimes makes ethernet drivers and integrated video chipsets (though not so much anymore).
You can have different BRANDS of the chipset, but they are all fundamentally the same thing, just a different brand. ie) Gigabyte, Foxconn, Asus etc etc
@mrstone56 I know this comment is a year old, but AMD owns ATI. For YEARS now. The ATI name is really only used for their catalystt drivers and little else.
@Greyghostvol1 ATi was still in charge of their own manufacturing process up until recently. AMD has owned ATi since ~2006, but they still operated independently, just under AMDs ownership. It's kind of like Skype being owned by Microsoft. They still operate independently, it's just that Microsoft owns them now.
@mrstone56 put together a pc that beats a PS3/Xbox360 for under $299, cause thats how much the consoles cost....and that would actually be a fair comparison.
@sobekflakmonkey Mhm. And how many people have custom operating systems running on their consoles? Few. Also, you couldn't do much with it, because the gaming would slow down. The reason your consoles are so fast, is because they're only running the OS kernel, the game, and a few tiny additions. Those consoles have very little RAM. A PS3, for an example, has 256 MB system and 256 MB video.
In contrast, I'm generally using around 1.8 GB of ram just to run win7 + Firefox 4.0b8pre.
@sobekflakmonkey Those are obviously only a few of the programs I'm running. I can handle 50 firefox tabs (max I've ever had to) without noticing any lag. That laptop cost 599 dollars last year, and costs around 300-400 now. It is, by no means, a gaming laptop. But if a console was to run more than the very very small OS & the game, it'd run games slower than my laptop.
That's exactly why you can't compare PCs with consoles. One's general purpose, the other's not.
@sookoll23 yes, but thats not the point, im talking for gaming in general, dont really care about that other stuff, i have my laptop for email and internet and such things, and i mostly use consoles for video games, to have a decent gaming computer you need to spend a larger amount of money, and to be honest look at the ps3 in comparison, look at the amazing first party games it pumps out that, games like uncharted 2, killzone 3 and God of War 3 definitely hold up to the best pc standards.
o@nidzaPFC yeah...but you have to do that so often, where as a console you pay $300 for a console and thats all you have to pay for the system for like 10 years, but with a pc your constantly paying for new shit, i mean dont get me wrong pc gaming is great, ive been doing alot of that lately cause my tv broke, but really, it is alot more affordable to be a console gamer.
@MadCommodore You ever see a side by side comparison? Oh, and if you build your own pc, then a ps3 would cost about 75% of what a decent pc costs. And it's well worth it, considering the much better controls, graphics, backwards compatibility, twice the possible resolution, a lot more support from the community and developers, and incredible re playability with mods in most games.
very fun game.easy enough for anyone to play but very fun.graphics are best out.gotta 8700m sli,doesnt push drctx10.only run on about medium 1/2 on drctx9
first almost everyting near it gets blown to shit by amazing big wind. then the spot where the bomb dropped the air gets vacuüm so all the winds comes back even faster. and then everything is gone. so this is not that realistic actually.
@IAmSomeoneOrOther why do you feel the need to get involved considering this happened two years ago? keep your nosey arse out of other peoples business.
they know that but if a video game actually tried to create a world according to proper scale no home pc would be able to play it for the next 20 years
Its not contradictive. At ALL. Well maybe a little but the game isnt a true real time strategy, its more of a just make a whole bunch of units and send them on their way game. and for that, it SUCKS
You have anger issues. And i don't see how i was being cocky. Cocky means "...boldly or brashly self-confident" according to Wikipedia. But MXhm91, i know what you are. You are an asshole, "...stupid, useless or even meaningless" according to Wikipedia. Fits you perfect doesn't it?
dude seriously you don't know me.... If you told me that IRL they would throw me in jail for assault... which means I would beat you until you face looks like a fucked up blueberry...
Based on your name I'm guessing you were born in 1991. Witch means your 17 or 18. Little boy, just stop talking, your making a fool out of yourself. Do your really think its necessary to show how much of a "badass" you are (sarcasm). Cause honestly, no one cares, and no one ever will care. Cause being a "badass" will get you knowhere in life, it just makes you look like an asshole. I'm done talking to you.
in DX10 it is easier to make graphics because it is new and you now that new things are better than old things...and rendering is easier in DX10 than the old DX9
wimpy nuke doesnt even have a shockwave effect i seen better on a Garry's Mod mod lol and if you dont know what that is trust me! hook it up on steam it was made by valve the guys who made all the Half Lifes now that is FUN!
It's fun playing around with a nuke on Garry's mod, but this is a tactical nuke ... not a nuke. If you send a normal nuke down near friendlies and enemies, that wouldn't be a wise decision. I mean, they're fighting over land, not making the land they're fighting for into a dead zone like Chernobyl.
Mercanaries 2 has similar explosions but guys it's nothing to do with the graphics card. It's the technique that developer uses that matters. Nothing else.
How fake look, yes I know its a game, if you was really that close you wouldn't be that close for long, and its very unrealistic, to what they said DX10 was capable of.
dude that dont mater i have recommand and still it runs slow it just need a big video crad lets say geforce 8800 gt +3 GB ram NO VISTA (i have vista its tering up my MB RAM)Dual ore quad core dosnt mater i recommend quad but i its kinda pricy 2,4 ghz and a good sound card well you dont have too get one but it still is cool with the new sound card
Although with most of the graphics settings on low or off.
Also, it will only be DirectX 9.0c compatible due to the fact that Windows XP(without a DX10 crack) will not run DX10, nor will your Radeon 9550 due to the fact that DX10 is in the hardware of the card.
Running it on the lowest resolution on the lowest settings should run it fine, but expect random freezeups and possibly some lag.
yeah, the trees dont even move from the shockwave and get ripped out from the ground and insinerated, the atomic bomb also has bo be larger and more of a ball of fire and less smoke-..
The people of Hiroshima would've gladly traded the nuke that was dropped on their city with the one in this clip. This thing can't even destroy my house, let alone an entire city. :P
Kinda ruin the game in it took out the entire map. The nuclear missile is ment to keep the game (fairly) balanced. If used correctly it can take out an entire team, but I think he was just demonstrating the graphics, not going to the "uberkill"
can someone explain wehat direct x 10 is, and i have an 8800gt, would it work whatever it is with my video card, so if u can, pls explain what it is, what it does, and if its good, and if it helps lol. THANKS!!!
In my rig this game lags lo much when it comes to WIC nukesProbably getting SLI is a smart way LOL, just add another 150USD and more 2nd 8800GTS 320MB coming to my home
thats not atomic bomb. 5000 punds bombs do mushrooms like that. when you see mushroom it doesn mean its some cause of atomic power. thats just big kaboom
So is there a difference between a TAC nuke and a nuke that whipes out hiroshima??? the lesson learnt is, DONT USE FUCKING NUKES EVER! just fps the bastards! lol! but what if there arent any spawn points or if you get lagg? youre dead!
Poor Chuck Norris...
simsfreak555 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World in Conflict Soviet Assault Hamachi server, Version: installing version
Ip: WIC Lan
Pw: 1234
MrRockingjoe 1 year ago
übelst schlecht
killer12924 1 year ago
PROTIP: NUKES DONT BEHAVE LIKE THAT
dsalimander 1 year ago
@dsalimander Well no shit
TonkatrainHONKHONK 1 year ago
@TonkatrainHONKHONK Well yes shit
dsalimander 1 year ago
Almost 3 years after getting the game I finally have a graphics card that can play this game.
Why do they put Intel graphic GPUs in laptops when its not compatible with graphics applications?
dinnerandashow 1 year ago
Very cool explosion.
But it would be better if it actually destroys something.
Just saying..
simsfreak555 1 year ago
that's one pussy of an explosion... TINY!!
Smashedupcar300 1 year ago
i prefered the fallout3 nuke
ihall4 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is that it?!?! LoL directx10 is still way behind PS3 then...and a PS3 costs 20% price of a PoS PC capable of running GTA 4/Dirt 2 lol you fanboys crack me up :)
MadCommodore 2 years ago
What do you think you are?
Youre a play station three fanboy.
cmndermlander 2 years ago 2
@MadCommodore You're an idiot, this guy has a terrible computer and you think it's bad, watch call of duty 5 on highest settings on my channel, then you'll see that your pathetic PS3 "games" aren't good at all.
highestsettings 2 years ago
you could always get dual 5970's and that PWNS a ps3
misticsniper 2 years ago
You could buy a damn 3870 and pwn a ps3.
PS3 and all consoles for that matter are not very powerful.
mrstone56 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
pc's suck, my ps3 pwns my intergrated nVidia 615 le
zman1512 2 years ago
No shit? It's a 6150 LE. That card is like 2004 era. Low end 2004 era. Get any $100 card today and your pc will pwn any console.
mrstone56 2 years ago 23
My point is that you can't compare pc's with consoles because pc hardware is not fixed and it's by several different manufactures.
zman1512 2 years ago
Actually it's by about 4 manufacturers.
Intel
AMD
nVidia
ATI
Intel and AMD make CPUs. nVidia and ATI make chipsets for motherboards as well as GPUs. Intel sometimes makes ethernet drivers and integrated video chipsets (though not so much anymore).
You can have different BRANDS of the chipset, but they are all fundamentally the same thing, just a different brand. ie) Gigabyte, Foxconn, Asus etc etc
mrstone56 2 years ago 3
@mrstone56 I know this comment is a year old, but AMD owns ATI. For YEARS now. The ATI name is really only used for their catalystt drivers and little else.
Greyghostvol1 8 months ago
@Greyghostvol1 ATi was still in charge of their own manufacturing process up until recently. AMD has owned ATi since ~2006, but they still operated independently, just under AMDs ownership. It's kind of like Skype being owned by Microsoft. They still operate independently, it's just that Microsoft owns them now.
mrstone56 8 months ago
@mrstone56 put together a pc that beats a PS3/Xbox360 for under $299, cause thats how much the consoles cost....and that would actually be a fair comparison.
sobekflakmonkey 1 year ago
@sobekflakmonkey Mhm. And how many people have custom operating systems running on their consoles? Few. Also, you couldn't do much with it, because the gaming would slow down. The reason your consoles are so fast, is because they're only running the OS kernel, the game, and a few tiny additions. Those consoles have very little RAM. A PS3, for an example, has 256 MB system and 256 MB video.
In contrast, I'm generally using around 1.8 GB of ram just to run win7 + Firefox 4.0b8pre.
sookoll23 1 year ago
@sobekflakmonkey Those are obviously only a few of the programs I'm running. I can handle 50 firefox tabs (max I've ever had to) without noticing any lag. That laptop cost 599 dollars last year, and costs around 300-400 now. It is, by no means, a gaming laptop. But if a console was to run more than the very very small OS & the game, it'd run games slower than my laptop.
That's exactly why you can't compare PCs with consoles. One's general purpose, the other's not.
sookoll23 1 year ago
@sookoll23 yes, but thats not the point, im talking for gaming in general, dont really care about that other stuff, i have my laptop for email and internet and such things, and i mostly use consoles for video games, to have a decent gaming computer you need to spend a larger amount of money, and to be honest look at the ps3 in comparison, look at the amazing first party games it pumps out that, games like uncharted 2, killzone 3 and God of War 3 definitely hold up to the best pc standards.
sobekflakmonkey 1 year ago
@sobekflakmonkey yes but u can upgrade PC, for example now you can buy 460gt for 150 $ and u have PC that is 3 times faster than console.
nidzaPFC 1 year ago
o@nidzaPFC yeah...but you have to do that so often, where as a console you pay $300 for a console and thats all you have to pay for the system for like 10 years, but with a pc your constantly paying for new shit, i mean dont get me wrong pc gaming is great, ive been doing alot of that lately cause my tv broke, but really, it is alot more affordable to be a console gamer.
sobekflakmonkey 1 year ago
@mrstone56 Amen
ubernagash 8 months ago
@zman1512 Holy shit, I've had things come out my ass that have spoke more intelligibly.
deathray393 1 year ago
amen brother
misaelfaust86 2 years ago
@MadCommodore You ever see a side by side comparison? Oh, and if you build your own pc, then a ps3 would cost about 75% of what a decent pc costs. And it's well worth it, considering the much better controls, graphics, backwards compatibility, twice the possible resolution, a lot more support from the community and developers, and incredible re playability with mods in most games.
deathray393 1 year ago
They should have added destructable stuff and it has physic to itself. Instead of animation death or w.e
iHateEmoPeoplesz 2 years ago 3
that would kinda be unfair and a nuke would probably take out half of the map and thats not fair
michael3021 2 years ago
It does, trust me...
hollocast 2 years ago
If everything is going wrong, destroy EVERYTHING :D
Shack11 2 years ago
there should be a nuke in the game instead of tactical nuke.
doctormoobbc 2 years ago
nato suxx!
pt 76 fnd bmp 2 CAN swim in real but cannot in game.
and one question how heawy tank can withstand direct hit of 205 mm shell?
Wow4ik4ik 2 years ago
very fun game.easy enough for anyone to play but very fun.graphics are best out.gotta 8700m sli,doesnt push drctx10.only run on about medium 1/2 on drctx9
deftonian69 2 years ago
reality is something different.
Dinyu01 2 years ago
MY FAVOURITE GAME!!!!!
(WORLD IN CONFLICT)
oh and here is hitman o
/||\⌐
/ \ he will kill that bob faggot
harjinder14 2 years ago
wats a 8800GS Like? better than the 9500GT?
hhs786 2 years ago
@hhs786 much better. about the same performance as a 8800 gt, little less i think.
deathray393 1 year ago
this is not how a atomic explosion looks like.
first almost everyting near it gets blown to shit by amazing big wind. then the spot where the bomb dropped the air gets vacuüm so all the winds comes back even faster. and then everything is gone. so this is not that realistic actually.
KitKatJunkie 2 years ago
it's only a game dumbass
dipsticklooneypie 2 years ago 19
@dipsticklooneypie hes saying it doesnt lag
MrBraydenbaker 1 year ago
@MrBraydenbaker and i said it was only a game ;)
dipsticklooneypie 1 year ago
@dipsticklooneypie *2 years later* *looks at description* ...
IAmSomeoneOrOther 6 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther why do you feel the need to get involved considering this happened two years ago? keep your nosey arse out of other peoples business.
dipsticklooneypie 6 months ago
You're not familiar with game balance are you?
Dynamicactionteam 2 years ago 3
Oh so this isn't real?
No shit it doesn't look like a real one, its not a real one.
holysoks1 2 years ago
t 90% of home PCs suck balls, maybe the devs wanted to keep the game running smoothly when one of thos babys is dropped
Tomahawk1505 2 years ago
you will blow the hole map away... not a fun game to play then... and not possible for games to make such a big eviroment change..
befrey 2 years ago
they know that but if a video game actually tried to create a world according to proper scale no home pc would be able to play it for the next 20 years
godscuttingyoudown 2 years ago
ps3 mabey could with its power
hbkfitz 2 years ago
No. Not even close.
Behemoth2334 2 years ago
I can wait until 2030, where a 100 dollar computer will be able to process the entire human race's knowledge.
Or I'll wait until 2020.
Shack11 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no chance mate.
all of human race die in 2012 the T.V said so...
bobslayer1881 2 years ago
If you're being sarcastic, you get 10 awesome points.
If you're serious, go kill yourself. We don't need your kind(idiots) poisoning our gene pool any more than it already is.
Shack11 2 years ago 5
its sarcasm (0_0)
bobslayer1881 2 years ago 2
Then 10 awesome points for you.
Shack11 2 years ago 2
lol tv said so thats the best comment ever. im not joking
spartan001191 2 years ago
T.V? Y ou believe the T.V now...
2012 is as fake as Katie Prices' tits.
Mazza4Azza 2 years ago
@bobslayer1881 lol, nice.
deathray393 1 year ago
human species*
ZionistCensorship 2 years ago
World in Conflict is fun but it isnt an RTS. Its more a tactical action game from a commander standpoint.
rj300zx 3 years ago
aha this as contradictive in the funniest way possible
Skarifik 2 years ago
Its not contradictive. At ALL. Well maybe a little but the game isnt a true real time strategy, its more of a just make a whole bunch of units and send them on their way game. and for that, it SUCKS
rj300zx 2 years ago
its not a nuke . its a tactical nuke^^
Scruffyx 3 years ago
dang those are some strong trees
gabman6 3 years ago
hey DUMBASS its a NUKE not an A-Bomb.
get it right.
NxakoNecv 3 years ago
What is the difference?!?
luckeecharm1 3 years ago
if you do not know then you are a dumbass.
1 a Nuke IS more powerful then the A-Bomb.
NxakoNecv 3 years ago
wow thats one smat ass answer...
Kapelannew 2 years ago
@NxakoNecv thought they were the same.
deathray393 1 year ago
Excuse me, can ATI Radeon 3850 1GB play world in conflict on max?
Tinnesa 3 years ago
I'm not sure, but unless at a very low resolution, probably not.
deathray393 1 year ago
@deathray393
Troll.
fuckyouimtall 1 year ago
i love it
ProfeaXchnl 3 years ago
nuke would have been better if there was the daisy cutter bomb effect with the trees and AoE.
Gankspank 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
poor pc... check out mine:
Intel Core i7-965 Extreme (3.20 GHz) Quad Core CPU w/ 8 MB L3 Cache
6 GB of Corsair Dominator DDR5-1600 CL8 Triple Channel Memory
(Supports Up To 24 GB Max)
Asus Rampage II Extreme ATX
Intel X58 DDR3 Triple Channel
Chipset
Intel X25-M 80 GB SSD
2 x Hitachi 1 TB 7200RPM SATA-II Hard Disk in RAID 1
Dual ATI Radeon HD 4870X2 PCI-E 2.0 Graphics w/ 2048 MB GDDR5 in QuadFire
JerrYReaPPer 3 years ago
kinda weak nuke. but amazing smoke effects...
UGoTDZeZ 3 years ago 2
What a weak nuke. what was that? a 12 foot blast range? lol still looked neat though
semperxfix10 3 years ago 3
Those trees are doing well considering what just landed next to them
ad200sx 3 years ago 3
like a real!
ihsanfauzi 3 years ago
nice, 8800 is great.
viniciusluc 3 years ago 5
IT LOOKS SO REAL
MXhm91 3 years ago
bull shit, looks good but not real
unrealboot1 3 years ago
shut up fool.... it looks real... not as real as "real" but it looks real... get what i'm saying?
MXhm91 3 years ago
u chat shit i dunno what shit u trying to say there..."IT LOOKS SO REAL" = LAWL
unrealboot1 3 years ago
unrealboot1 = LAWL
MXhm91 3 years ago
unrealboot1 + MXhm91 = LAWL!
Metallica737 3 years ago 2
metallica737 don't get into this... just shut up... seriously you'd be that cocky IRL I would floor you right away
MXhm91 3 years ago
You have anger issues. And i don't see how i was being cocky. Cocky means "...boldly or brashly self-confident" according to Wikipedia. But MXhm91, i know what you are. You are an asshole, "...stupid, useless or even meaningless" according to Wikipedia. Fits you perfect doesn't it?
Metallica737 3 years ago
dude seriously you don't know me.... If you told me that IRL they would throw me in jail for assault... which means I would beat you until you face looks like a fucked up blueberry...
MXhm91 3 years ago
Based on your name I'm guessing you were born in 1991. Witch means your 17 or 18. Little boy, just stop talking, your making a fool out of yourself. Do your really think its necessary to show how much of a "badass" you are (sarcasm). Cause honestly, no one cares, and no one ever will care. Cause being a "badass" will get you knowhere in life, it just makes you look like an asshole. I'm done talking to you.
Metallica737 3 years ago
DID YOU PLAY WITH NO HOPE MOD
TheRock9z 3 years ago 2
isnt there a some kind of stormwave or whatever when you nuke a place?
Saggamawuat 3 years ago
what does the no hope mod do exactly
tastyryan 3 years ago
Thanks enteng2366 now i can see the difference...
jgbrandi 3 years ago
whats the diference betwen dx9 and dx10, i cant see nothing diferent and i have vista dx10
jgbrandi 3 years ago
the difference is in the spelling...
see DX"10" and DX"9"
enteng2366 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAH!!!
TekuYuzami 3 years ago
nice 1 lol d:
khazor123 3 years ago
oh ok here it is.....
in DX10 it is easier to make graphics because it is new and you now that new things are better than old things...and rendering is easier in DX10 than the old DX9
enteng2366 3 years ago
dx10 is microsofts way of forcing us to accept the incomplete version of windows 7 known as vista
chrislawless 3 years ago 2
I must agree.
Profanwolf 3 years ago 2
it's more like an atomic fart :(
mrasskick1 3 years ago 2
wimpy nuke doesnt even have a shockwave effect i seen better on a Garry's Mod mod lol and if you dont know what that is trust me! hook it up on steam it was made by valve the guys who made all the Half Lifes now that is FUN!
knockdoun 3 years ago
It's fun playing around with a nuke on Garry's mod, but this is a tactical nuke ... not a nuke. If you send a normal nuke down near friendlies and enemies, that wouldn't be a wise decision. I mean, they're fighting over land, not making the land they're fighting for into a dead zone like Chernobyl.
roflmaog3 3 years ago
WIC FTW!!!!
Tbone00095 3 years ago
Wow bad nuke. The trees doesn't even rip off the ground.
kaninsmink 3 years ago
umm, is this multiplyareor like skirmish or what?
DemiroBiH 3 years ago
ns game
spipel996 3 years ago
oh wow, that's quite a small atomic explosion..
MiksuK 3 years ago 6
indeed it's quite weak
The3rdPlateau 3 years ago
It's a tactical nuke, nothing like the real thing.
Cryptex410 3 years ago 2
Indeed..... lol
knockdoun 3 years ago
Uhh, looks no different from 9c
phillerupper 3 years ago
i can watch this video on high quality
mamananau 3 years ago
Graphics are okay but those trees should be knocked out by the explosion!...
cyther39 3 years ago 5
where is the shockwave?
mamananau 3 years ago
what game is?
spartam3212 3 years ago
world in conflict!
megacomrade 3 years ago
Mercanaries 2 has similar explosions but guys it's nothing to do with the graphics card. It's the technique that developer uses that matters. Nothing else.
sarpersaridal 3 years ago
Cool!! What is this Game??
cyther39 3 years ago
read the info. ^^
dunmer26 3 years ago
toié haha
razor536 3 years ago
those 8800 GTX were awesome cards
gtvapsamtik 3 years ago
Well... that wasa shit... not realistic by far, and I though WiC would handle it more serious.
Come to think of it best Nuke I've seen so far in a RTS is in C&C Generals, mostly older games.
Seriously WTF? Game rocks, graphics are more than solid most of the time... but this... this was just weak... (LOL "DX10").
NeoXF 3 years ago 3
I like supreme commander's nukes.
UltimateEnd0 3 years ago
ioj
thissnowtastfunny 3 years ago
Sorry *World In Conflict
Nolodran 3 years ago
Ha World on Conflict,great game :)
Nolodran 3 years ago
great work man what a game and graphics
AMCIABLE 3 years ago
ooo WiC... great game... hard.. too
CrossCorvetteZ06 3 years ago
How fake look, yes I know its a game, if you was really that close you wouldn't be that close for long, and its very unrealistic, to what they said DX10 was capable of.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Here are my pc's specs:
ATI Radeon 9550 AGP (128mb)
512mb RAM
Intel Pentium 4; 2.667GHz CPU (single core)
Is it worth me getting this game or will it run so slow i dhouldn't bother?
Nukes look awesome btw.
TotalWarrior86 3 years ago
relax it will run no problem or if u are want to realy know google search: can you run it ... by sysreqlaband test ur pc
bmwguy11 3 years ago
dude that dont mater i have recommand and still it runs slow it just need a big video crad lets say geforce 8800 gt +3 GB ram NO VISTA (i have vista its tering up my MB RAM)Dual ore quad core dosnt mater i recommend quad but i its kinda pricy 2,4 ghz and a good sound card well you dont have too get one but it still is cool with the new sound card
m14g 3 years ago
i word new pc
m14g 3 years ago
Correcting bmwguy11,
It will run,
Although with most of the graphics settings on low or off.
Also, it will only be DirectX 9.0c compatible due to the fact that Windows XP(without a DX10 crack) will not run DX10, nor will your Radeon 9550 due to the fact that DX10 is in the hardware of the card.
Running it on the lowest resolution on the lowest settings should run it fine, but expect random freezeups and possibly some lag.
A7X for life.
a7xdrummer22 3 years ago
yeah, the trees dont even move from the shockwave and get ripped out from the ground and insinerated, the atomic bomb also has bo be larger and more of a ball of fire and less smoke-..
Xen8 3 years ago
Thats because that game isnt directx 10 its directx 9 he Has a directx 10 card but not directx 10 game
SOF006 3 years ago
Absolutely Ruthless!
Starship Troopers has a surprisingly good Nuke effect also... FPS game though, apples n oranges.
TheeREALNeuralTech 3 years ago
u can order reinforcements now. lmao its after nuke, u gotta be kidding me
SomeRandomAsian 3 years ago
Yeah its a tactical nuke, not every nuke has to be a Continent destroying monster
epicxbread 3 years ago 3
'tactical' (baby) nuke
sammy832 3 years ago 2
The people of Hiroshima would've gladly traded the nuke that was dropped on their city with the one in this clip. This thing can't even destroy my house, let alone an entire city. :P
Harregarre 3 years ago
...liked it... what game is that?
hentajus 3 years ago
World in Conflict
Finger2212 3 years ago
looks pretty lame.
sound, shock wave and proper mushroom cloud are all missing
QuAKeR996 3 years ago 3
yep! nuke for kids
xStalkerxx 3 years ago
OMG what a hewj explosion it took down 4 WHOLE trees
yusthavinfun 3 years ago 2
Kinda ruin the game in it took out the entire map. The nuclear missile is ment to keep the game (fairly) balanced. If used correctly it can take out an entire team, but I think he was just demonstrating the graphics, not going to the "uberkill"
DbCSteelLegion 3 years ago 2
its a nuke for kids
paddythetinker 3 years ago
Ok answer me this please:
My system:
card: XFX GeFORCE 8600 GTS XXX
processor: intel core 2 duo 1.8 ghz
ram: 2gb
can i run this game on high??
paddythetinker 3 years ago
yes you can
WizardDoom 3 years ago
awesome!!!
LMHV68 3 years ago
That's way too small to even be a tactical nuke. It's probably just an oversized conventional bomb.
LampreyMoose 3 years ago 7
Its toned down for balance. In one of the missions there is a full power one.
dajmeister 3 years ago
I know lol I hate the way games make nukes so friggin weak... especially the older ones lol
tehQshow 3 years ago
what game is this? Looks awesome
Crazylalalalala 3 years ago
world in conflict
Xenoon007 3 years ago
On 0:39 Lagg?
Edga0ras 3 years ago
not lag fps drop
DogWeed91 3 years ago
that nuke gets smaller and smaller each time i see it lol
dreadfear1 3 years ago
smallest nuke ever i guess...
thijsmolenaar 3 years ago 3
Wow- thats beautifully rendered smoke- nice video bro u get a thumbs up!
illmagnified 3 years ago
lol that even puts tacticle nukes to shame :(
mydelee 3 years ago
Good for the environment.
teamwounder 3 years ago
that was pretty sweet, imagine that in the middle of an FPS just coming in ur screen and blowin the living daylights out of everything
thekingdor 3 years ago
Nice physics
SaltyPeppr 3 years ago
can someone explain wehat direct x 10 is, and i have an 8800gt, would it work whatever it is with my video card, so if u can, pls explain what it is, what it does, and if its good, and if it helps lol. THANKS!!!
tyler7878 3 years ago
it will,if you have a game which supports dx10 and vista
desidude006 3 years ago
You install it by removing the GPU fan and then update the drivers.
snevelin 3 years ago
Man i was so amazed that u can play wic on very high using 8500gt view my channel to watch it
Geefee12 3 years ago
AND THE TREES ARE STILL STANDING!!!!
Inuyasha1945 3 years ago 6
In my rig this game lags lo much when it comes to WIC nukesProbably getting SLI is a smart way LOL, just add another 150USD and more 2nd 8800GTS 320MB coming to my home
rizaguntur 3 years ago
thats not atomic bomb. 5000 punds bombs do mushrooms like that. when you see mushroom it doesn mean its some cause of atomic power. thats just big kaboom
Leon1700 3 years ago
expand the explosion radius 10k times and you have it perfect :)
marrowman11 3 years ago
So is there a difference between a TAC nuke and a nuke that whipes out hiroshima??? the lesson learnt is, DONT USE FUCKING NUKES EVER! just fps the bastards! lol! but what if there arent any spawn points or if you get lagg? youre dead!
patpat070 3 years ago