Exactly. Mark Halperin (who, by the way, molests puppies) would never defend himself from a smear. Mark (who has raped more women than you've had sandwiches) wouldn't lower himself to trying to counter a smear or stating that the evidence was lacking.
The puppy-buggering mass-rapist... or so I hear; wouldn't bother to defend himself. Not when doing so might be divisive. Not even if the smear gets wide play.
Just remember that about the puppy-buggering mass-rapist Mark.
Ignore the noise. Their strategy is always to attack, then if an attack fails, strategically back down slightly, demanding the right be equally "reasonable". And when we back off with a sigh of relief, they attack again.
It inevitably ends with the phrase, "both sides do it and should ... blah blah".
Don't back down. They have paused, so we must continue the attacks. Never apologize for being right and defending freedom.
Why shouldn't we defend ourselves? The libs want Mr. Loughner to be one of us -- badly. They are acting like he is one of us. The pushback is obviously to point out their own instances of what they would class as intemporate political speech. If their version doesn't promote violence from them, then why does our version promote violence from us?
I doubt those who threw shoes at a picture of a Bush target would throw them at the real thing.
how does "joe scarborough" look at himself in the mirror after that ? sal i want to know.
MpowerdAPE 8 months ago
Seems liberal progressives liked conservatives a lot better when we knew our place.
AlbanyPC 1 year ago 2
So, if someone accuses Halperin of committing a felony, he won't mind?
MooseOfReason 1 year ago 3
Gee Mark, looks like your strategary is losing huh?
btwall60 1 year ago 3
He hoped for an OK City for Obama and now slams the right for defending itself against the left's false witness.
drillanwr 1 year ago 4
someone needs to lock this guy in a closet...
Dogote82 1 year ago
Exactly. Mark Halperin (who, by the way, molests puppies) would never defend himself from a smear. Mark (who has raped more women than you've had sandwiches) wouldn't lower himself to trying to counter a smear or stating that the evidence was lacking.
The puppy-buggering mass-rapist... or so I hear; wouldn't bother to defend himself. Not when doing so might be divisive. Not even if the smear gets wide play.
Just remember that about the puppy-buggering mass-rapist Mark.
gekkobear 1 year ago 6
Ignore the noise. Their strategy is always to attack, then if an attack fails, strategically back down slightly, demanding the right be equally "reasonable". And when we back off with a sigh of relief, they attack again.
It inevitably ends with the phrase, "both sides do it and should ... blah blah".
Don't back down. They have paused, so we must continue the attacks. Never apologize for being right and defending freedom.
RogerOnTheRight 1 year ago 2
Why shouldn't we defend ourselves? The libs want Mr. Loughner to be one of us -- badly. They are acting like he is one of us. The pushback is obviously to point out their own instances of what they would class as intemporate political speech. If their version doesn't promote violence from them, then why does our version promote violence from us?
I doubt those who threw shoes at a picture of a Bush target would throw them at the real thing.
Loughner isn't us.
unclesmrgol 1 year ago 2
Imagine: People getting upset when they've been defamed.
BrianMChampion 1 year ago 3
Delusional.
ButterflyDragon9 1 year ago 2