@MPG350 So you don't bother with trials in USA? Just having someone found in the same area as an extremest group is proof enough that they're a terrorist? Very interesting...
Over here in Britain our legal system works on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. We also don't hold people without trial. It's been like that since the 13th century. Interestingly, most other civilised countries in the world work on the same principle.
@rik78 If it help gather intel then I am all for it, I really don't care about terrorist rights as long as they go around killing innocent people. If they can get the information that can just prevent one persons death then it was worth it.
OK thats fair, but you forgetting one important thing. If the military waterboards its for intel to help prevent more lost innocent lives, if the taliban tortures its because they want more intel to kill more innocent lives. Sorry but I wont stick up for the rights of terrorist.
600 of the 779 have been released without ever even being charged with anything.
171 remain (including children, which is against international law).
Source: Wikipedia page on "Guantanamo Bay detention camp"
Now why would the USA release 600 terrorists? Could it be that there was no evidence they were terrorists perhaps? Seems a strange thing to do otherwise.
@rik78 Depends on the numbers some report over 500, either way I am willing to bet none of them were waterboarded. That is usually used on people high up in taliban that have confirmed terrorist ties.
@EEEL123 I could get you to tell me that you sucked over 1000 dicks in a year by doing this. Doesnt mean what your saying is true. If you dont agree this is torture then Im guessing youre an american ...
@jtalfredo22 I think you have misinterpreted what I said. I was responding to Zacharycat who said 'What a baby, it's just a little water. Worst that can happen is you drown.' 'That's what will happen to you if you refuse to talk,' is not an endorsement of torture. I was refuting his statement that 'it's just a little water.' I never said that what the victim said would be true and accurate, I was just saying that he would 'talk'. I do NOT support torture.
aww common they can chop off our heads but we cant pour some water over theirs for information? we have used it 3 times... on the top 3 al queada terrorist groups.. all 3 times we got VERY important intel. bring it back tbh... and im one of the few to have actually tried water boarding lol
From what I understand, at that point where I himd in, you were discussing the war in Iraq/Afghanistan's civilian death toll and relating it to WW II, with the difference being that in Japan we launched pamphlets from planes to warn them about their coming doom. (Which is still not justification for nuking them "oh we warned them, they didn't leave it s not our fault.." sorry not good enough.) Is that the wrong context?
@ParalegalX as a matter of fact yes...the topic was not death toll...it was targets...and the us military does not specifically target civilians like the taliban does...the drktmlar guy wanted to use s 60+yr old world war 2 attack as an example...i never said anything about how right or wrong it was just that you cant use a world war attack that happened over 60 yrs ago as an example of todays military tactics against a guerrilla grp of terrorists
if you want to see how it's really done (because this was a pale imitation of the true technique) I invite viewers to search for Christopher Hitchens waterboardind experience. He didn't last long either.
My god, I cant believe the dead look in the soldiers eyes. Its a terrible thing to see my fellow man so far gone...... I must add he is excellent at water boarding, look at that wrist action! Hes a pro
@kelvinscreations It sounded more like he pronounced it like most ignorant individuals try to pronounce it, something like "Drownding", but the again the audio isn't the clearest in this video, it could just be a glitch. :P
for all those who dont think this form of "torture" is acceptable...after your family is killed by some militant anti-american you go try to play good cop bad cop in a regular interigation with someone connected to the murderers and see how much info you glean from them....fukin bleeding hearts...go cry for a fukin tree....
@bklee83 Some estimate a million Iraqis have died as a result of the American Invasion and Occupation.
The point is, the anger one might feel against militant anti-Americans is felt against OUR troops by many locals. Even according to the CIA report on the matter, it is American Policy and Military Action that is the cause of that sentiment. If you want to blame someone for killing your family, blame our county's Militant actions and the Military Industrial Complex.
@drktmplar so what your saying is that uninformed people decide to kill american civillians for what they think is the all around american sentiment...how offen does the american military target civillian populations...i agree that we shouldnt be over there but what your saying is 2 wrongs make a right...
@bklee83 We agree on this point. The things we've done in Iraq do not right the wrong of 9/11.
I only want to ask *why* anti-American sentiment exists. When I answer that question, I want to then ask, "Do our actions improve or worsen the situation?" After 9/11, anti-American sentiment has risen, ~8000 American soldiers and maybe a million Iraqis lie dead, and our national debt has increased by over a trillion. That money could have been used to educate, heal, and develop our nation.
@drktmplar nono...see...what im saying is the attack on american civilians was the 2nd wrong...american military forces dont target civilian populations...anti-american terrorists do...while i agree we shouldnt be over there in the first place and the money spent continuing could be much better spent...the idea of "death to america" as a whole based on what the politicians do is rediculouse...the american people dont care what they do over there as long as its not an attack on us
@bklee83 And what I'm saying is that the War on Terror was the 3rd wrong. So, are you saying two wrongs don't make a right, but three do?
The ORB survey places Iraqi deaths at one million, and I guarantee you a large portion of that number is civilian deaths. And do you honestly think we bombed their capital city of Baghdad without killing civilians?
Also, as for the American Military targeting civilians, you only need to look at the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 200,000 dead, mostly civis.
@drktmplar sweet fukin christ are you serious...ok...first...i already said i dont agree with the warfront as it is...call it what you will...but to try and say WW2 was anything like whats goin on in todays world is strait moronic...honestly i cant believe you even tried to go there...wow your dumb....
@bklee83 You misunderstand me. I never said WW2 was like today. I was only replying to your statement: "american military forces dont target civilian populations"
I simply replied, "Yes they do. Here's a modern example in Iraq, and here's a historical example in Japan."
I have no idea how you thought I was saying the War or Terror and WW2 are similar situations. It seems both of us agree that such a statement is pretty dumb lol!
Also, I feel my original post compliments your statement that: "the american people dont care what they do over there as long as its not an attack on us"
The people over there hardly even know we exist. They are mostly poorly educated people just trying to making a living like anybody else. Most people over there don't even know about 9/11 and never hated the American people. So, not only are WE fine with leaving them alone, but THEY are fine with leaving us alone too.
@drktmplar you tried to say american military targets civi pops...and used the nukes in japan 60+ yrs ago as an example...i think its pretty safe to say that we live in slightly different times...the us military doesnt target civi pops...AND before those bombs were dropped in japan for several days to weeks us planes dropped flyers all over the cities telling them what was going to happen if they didnt surrender...
@bklee83 Ah, I'm sorry. You're right. The US might not directly target civis, but it definitely still kills plenty of civis. You only need to look up specifics of the casualty demographics in Iraq to confirm this fact.
ANYHOW, the main point is not about civis. The main point is that two wrongs don't make a right, especially when the second wrong is committed against someone who doesn't even know what the first wrong was.
The other point I made was that Liberty is worth the risk of Terrorism.
@bklee83 Yes, but comparing our 2 current "wars" and World War II is comparing apples to oranges. In this case both fruit are bad of course. In our current "wars" you could argue that we are targeting civilian population in every case. For example, if Canada invaded us (cliche to keep using China as a reference for this point?) and sent all their tanks, bombs, martial-law style tactics (ie- curfew, road blocks, indefinate imprisonment, etc..) with any amount of their standing army CONT-
@ParalegalX CONT- then you, as a civilian, and I do mean literally "you", presumably would get a gun, get some friends, and look for a higher organization to become part of (in this case the Taliban) in order to stop Canada from continuing to murder everyone you knew in high school. You would be told that Canada is saying to its own citizens that "you" are jealous of Canada's freedom and that "you" were part of the attack of Sept. 11th. You were not part, you only are fighting
@ParalegalX because the country, even though there are many things you wish you had the chance to change about, is "your" country. With "your" family, friends, and neighbors being bombed by a country whose own soldiers don't realize that they are actually serving profiteers and warmongerers, thus fueling "your" rage against them to the point of suicide attack.
@ParalegalX And all the while "you" are labeled as a terrorist who wants to bring fear and ruin to the people of a country that "you" used to wish you could vacation to.
@ParalegalX i love when people jump into a convo 1/2 way threw and decide to put their 2 cents in...either way...my point is that when trying to obtain information from someone who is already willing to kill themself for their side to win...you must use unconventional interrogation tactics to get the info you need...and civi casualties who are unintentional targets are called collateral dmg...that happens...the muslim extremists on the other hand actually target civillians...
@bklee83 First of all, it is a youtube comment section... Second, what you said just now- I 100% agree with. The real issue is understanding that the "terrorism" is a symptom caused by the disease of the CIA instigating Sept. 11th, and in turn causing the "war" in Iraq. The "terrorists" before seeing their families destroyed, were civilians, and one could only hope that if we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan, will forgive us and stop attempting to be a threat.
@ParalegalX youtube comment section or not...you have no idea what drktmplar and i were talking abour in reference to ww2...thats why i love when people decide to chime in about what is being said when they have no clue what is meant because they have no context to refer back to...
The Patriot Act (surveillance) and the War on Terror (trillions of dollars of debt, increased taxation, less money for schools, etc.) both make ME less free. Even if Freedom (in the form of less war and surveillance) makes us an easier target for Terrorism, I say - I want my Freedom.
I say this because cars kill 30,000-40,000 Americans per year, yet most of us accept that risk so that we can drive our cars.
Likewise, deaths from Terrorism since 9/11 are about 3000. That's 300 per year, and +90% of it happened ON 9/11. If I can accept the risk of driving a car, then I can ABSOLUTELY accept the risk of Terrorism if it means I can retain my Freedom. ♥
Lol, for the record, I prefer Public Transportation. Unfortunately, I don't live in NYC anymore. Car it is. :(
@PktMma No the definition of Torture of is "The action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something."
It's not inflicting severe pain, but is inflicting great fear. I'm not defending it, it's immoral and that "bomb in a city" scenario doesn't justify it's use.
3 or 4 people are screaming at you, you are then dragged by your hair and someone rips your blind fold off while holding your face against the floor and a snarling dog is brought to your face. The lights go out, and you are blind folded again and strapped to a table, they then begin to waterboard you. The psych torture occurred over 4 hours, with the changing of cells and screaming happening over about 7 minutes prior to be tabled. This is how it is actually done.
He should of done this more real world. Here is how it is actually done. You are blind folded in a cell. You hear faint screams and dogs barking for hours. The cell door slams open, you are dragged by the hair and thrown into another cell. They tie your hands, and someone is shouting at you inches from your face in a language you don't understand, the door slams and the screams you heard before are louder (they are on tape). Seconds later the door slams open again and...
Sleep deprivation was used as a method of torture, I don't recall that "invoking blood." Does that make it anything less than torture? Absolutely not. Only a complete moron, imbecile, and simpleton would ever deny methods such as this to be torture. It is putting the mind and body under incredible strain, fear, and pain. Just because you don't physically hurt someone, does not, in any stretch of the imagination, mean they are not in pain.
When he said 'Is this considered torture?' the soldier should have broken his nose with the butt of his rifle. Y'know, just so the simulation is realistic.
theres a way you can last a minute doing that...i searched this up and one way to last a min is by holding as much air as possible and putting ur nose agianst ur upper lip...so basically the thing you should in this situation is to make your lips point up so you can block out water from going through...
@5swordmaster that's impossible to do. you cannot completely seal off your nostrils with an airtight seal using only your upper lip unless you are inhaling rapidly at the same time, which you cannot do with water pouring up your nose of you will drown. nice try, though.
notice playboy channel made this, what u dont see is theres a big orgy after where the guy in the amy gear changes it 4 gimp suit, and the all in enjoy a diffent verson of water sports
"some consider it torture" probley everyone it ever happened to and everyone who doesnt want it too happen to them. Panic and fear are two off most painfull things there are .Torturer nice mum must be proud .
Perfect for terrorists. They fly planes into our buildings and kill our troops don't expect sympathy from us. Unless you're a liberal who is worried about "torture".
@Norie92 Why is it only terrorism when someone else does it? Who is, 'They?' How would it feel to find out you were torturing and killing, the 'wrong' people? Go read: A Timeline of CIA Atrocities
By Steve Kangas [don't be confused when he speaks about communism, anything can be placed in that spot, like religious extremist, any religion will do.
@artzilla Well terrorism has a definition and by "they" i mean terrorists. They do it for politically and religiously motivated reasons. I dislike the CIA as much as you do, it sounds like. Even if their attack was due to blowback they still killed innocent civilians, not even soldiers. For that, they are guilty and they must endure harsh questioning. I'm not saying burn them with cattle branders, I'm saying using waterboarding is the best we have without actually leaving bruises.
@Norie92 lol we need to be doing this to our own men in the government that planned 9/11, it was in inside job. And before you respond to me, educate yourself on what really happened that day. Good day, sir.
@amknafla And what evidence points to 9/11 being an inside job? i have seen the loose change documentary and others but they don't give an explanation to why they think the government did it.
@Norie92 we don't need to know WHY the government did it, even though it was obviously a scare tactic so we could start an unnecessary war. We just need to know IF the government did it, and there is an overwhelming amount of evidence against our government, I could provide you with links but its impossible over youtube. It honestly doesn't take much to find on google though.
@trakkaton No I don't, I've seen the 9/11 documentaries. Multiple ones that say the government did it. I just want conclusive evidence THEY did it. It could have been CIA, which they're known to do this bull crap. Operation Northwoods.
Well, it's obvious that it's an inside job, and it's obvious that the secret service (Bush continuing to read "My pet goat" at an disclosed location) as well as the military (NORAD stand down) as well as the government (promoting those who "failed", killing and threatening those who "succeeded") and the 9/11 commisson (who said that they were set up to fail and accepted it) were complicit. So who cares who started it and who was going along with it? Btw OP Northwoods = government.
@trakkaton Another thing I learned is that it was uncovered during the 9/11 investigations that they had caught one of the terrorists on Illegal immigration but instead of deporting him the FBI ordered him let go. Saw it on Fox News documentary the other night. But anyways yes there is reasonable suspicion but there is still too much doubt to make a fair, unbiased judgment I think. Yeah Op Northwoods was gov't but i'm saying the CIA would have carried it out.
@jsf525 There is a Standing offer from Keith Olbermann to Sean Hannity, who claims that waterboarding is not torture, to try it for $1000.00 per second, and then say it is not torture. :)
@trakkaton..... your an idiot.. i know you dont think so and you wont believe me, but you are.. you are the type of person that is whats wrong with america.
@trakkaton If you do this yourself...It truly does invoke fear in your head and feels almost like you are 50 ft underwater, but it doesn't actually even feel like torture to be honest, it happens fast and is over even quicker.
@Tenchi10 The difference is when you do it yourself you can decide when to stop. When this is done as torture there are no metal objects in your hands or code words to make it end.
so this is just like soft drowning
Cuah123 6 hours ago
"You're gonna want to breathe....but you won't be able to."
Still not torture somehow. Oh...ok.
ACABbear 23 hours ago
@rik78
Tell him about the NDAA!
Where U.S citizens can be labeled a terrorist for having a 7 day supply worth of food.
And can arrest you with out trial!
Arrest you in public or in private.
Assassinate you in public or private.
Either way.once you labled as a terrorist by OUR government.I guess its ok...right......what ignorant bastards.
bro577 3 days ago
I don't care if its torture its not like its being used on grandma its being used on terrorist and if it can get some intel then I am all for it
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 How do you know they're terrorists? They've never stood trial and been found guilty of anything.
rik78 1 week ago
@rik78 Usually when people are found with extremist islamic terrorist groups they usually are not innocent
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 So you don't bother with trials in USA? Just having someone found in the same area as an extremest group is proof enough that they're a terrorist? Very interesting...
Over here in Britain our legal system works on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. We also don't hold people without trial. It's been like that since the 13th century. Interestingly, most other civilised countries in the world work on the same principle.
When you're ready to join us, give us a shout.
rik78 1 week ago
@rik78 You have to break a few eggs if you want to make a omelette, not saying its right but thats how it goes..
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 "Not saying it's right but that's how it goes". So you do know it's wrong but you don't care?
rik78 1 week ago
@rik78 If it help gather intel then I am all for it, I really don't care about terrorist rights as long as they go around killing innocent people. If they can get the information that can just prevent one persons death then it was worth it.
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 But that's just it, you don't KNOW they're terrorists do you.
What if you were to find out the Taliban were torturing American civilians they were convinced were military. Fair enough?
rik78 1 week ago
OK thats fair, but you forgetting one important thing. If the military waterboards its for intel to help prevent more lost innocent lives, if the taliban tortures its because they want more intel to kill more innocent lives. Sorry but I wont stick up for the rights of terrorist.
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 Again, we don't know they're terrorists though. They've not been found guilty of anything.
If they had been found guilty of killing innocents I (and many others) would sympathise with you.
rik78 1 week ago
@rik78 Many have been convicted of terrorism
MPG350 1 week ago
@MPG350 Three have been convicted of terrorism.
600 of the 779 have been released without ever even being charged with anything.
171 remain (including children, which is against international law).
Source: Wikipedia page on "Guantanamo Bay detention camp"
Now why would the USA release 600 terrorists? Could it be that there was no evidence they were terrorists perhaps? Seems a strange thing to do otherwise.
rik78 1 week ago
@rik78 Depends on the numbers some report over 500, either way I am willing to bet none of them were waterboarded. That is usually used on people high up in taliban that have confirmed terrorist ties.
MPG350 1 week ago
@rik78 sorry i commented but didn't send it to you. ha
MPG350 1 week ago
have any of those people who don't consider this as torture tried it?
RojoDiablo1 3 weeks ago
Why can't they waterboard criminals in prisons?
AbuBishir 3 weeks ago
@AbuBishir because it is inhumane, imorale, and wrong.
3Slim3Shady3 2 weeks ago
You can see it in that soldiers eyes, when dude walked in. He has zero problem with this, and I'm sure killing does not rock his world either.
fromtherye 4 weeks ago
its torture......
end of story
Zanthios 1 month ago
What a baby, it's just a little water. Worst that can happen is you drown.
zacharycat 1 month ago
@zacharycat Yeah, I mean, hey, whats worth then death? lol
VoreTechz1985 1 month ago
@zacharycat That's what will happen to you if you refuse to talk.
EEEL123 2 weeks ago
@EEEL123 I could get you to tell me that you sucked over 1000 dicks in a year by doing this. Doesnt mean what your saying is true. If you dont agree this is torture then Im guessing youre an american ...
jtalfredo22 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jtalfredo22 I think you have misinterpreted what I said. I was responding to Zacharycat who said 'What a baby, it's just a little water. Worst that can happen is you drown.' 'That's what will happen to you if you refuse to talk,' is not an endorsement of torture. I was refuting his statement that 'it's just a little water.' I never said that what the victim said would be true and accurate, I was just saying that he would 'talk'. I do NOT support torture.
EEEL123 2 weeks ago
aww common they can chop off our heads but we cant pour some water over theirs for information? we have used it 3 times... on the top 3 al queada terrorist groups.. all 3 times we got VERY important intel. bring it back tbh... and im one of the few to have actually tried water boarding lol
bigplayer2382 1 month ago
That soldier looked like the real deal in the beginning. I was intimidated just by watching him. He's probably taken a few lives lol.
XMMAFANX 1 month ago 2
From what I understand, at that point where I himd in, you were discussing the war in Iraq/Afghanistan's civilian death toll and relating it to WW II, with the difference being that in Japan we launched pamphlets from planes to warn them about their coming doom. (Which is still not justification for nuking them "oh we warned them, they didn't leave it s not our fault.." sorry not good enough.) Is that the wrong context?
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX as a matter of fact yes...the topic was not death toll...it was targets...and the us military does not specifically target civilians like the taliban does...the drktmlar guy wanted to use s 60+yr old world war 2 attack as an example...i never said anything about how right or wrong it was just that you cant use a world war attack that happened over 60 yrs ago as an example of todays military tactics against a guerrilla grp of terrorists
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 9/11.
VoreTechz1985 1 month ago
@VoreTechz1985 is there a point to your response to my comment or do you just want to say 9/11
bklee83 1 month ago
That seems a bit stupid.
SoflesViolence 1 month ago
if you want to see how it's really done (because this was a pale imitation of the true technique) I invite viewers to search for Christopher Hitchens waterboardind experience. He didn't last long either.
zaxxxon 1 month ago
At a party it ended in a waterboarding game...It wasnt a very fun experience...
Though i lasted about 12 seconds.
But i put that partly down to me taking a large gulp of air before going under.
rorrt 1 month ago
Damn with that name I thought he would be tougher. I mean a guy named Sheila must have been through hell on high school.
Morclaw 1 month ago
it is torture
almaster666 1 month ago
0:33 "nothings so bad you cant stand 15 seconds of it"
I'll wage that you cant perform cunnilingus on Rosie 'O' Donald for 15 seconds.
abarford1 1 month ago
Drownding?.... failure.
PewPewPlease 1 month ago
My god, I cant believe the dead look in the soldiers eyes. Its a terrible thing to see my fellow man so far gone...... I must add he is excellent at water boarding, look at that wrist action! Hes a pro
TomBag34 1 month ago
And what's the fear?
Drowving.
Sooo... Like driving and drowning?
kelvinscreations 1 month ago
@kelvinscreations It sounded more like he pronounced it like most ignorant individuals try to pronounce it, something like "Drownding", but the again the audio isn't the clearest in this video, it could just be a glitch. :P
xKillerClownx 1 month ago
for all those who dont think this form of "torture" is acceptable...after your family is killed by some militant anti-american you go try to play good cop bad cop in a regular interigation with someone connected to the murderers and see how much info you glean from them....fukin bleeding hearts...go cry for a fukin tree....
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 Most people in the Middle East don't even know what 9/11 is. They have no idea what troops are doing there or why we're bombing them.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@drktmplar your point is???
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 Some estimate a million Iraqis have died as a result of the American Invasion and Occupation.
The point is, the anger one might feel against militant anti-Americans is felt against OUR troops by many locals. Even according to the CIA report on the matter, it is American Policy and Military Action that is the cause of that sentiment. If you want to blame someone for killing your family, blame our county's Militant actions and the Military Industrial Complex.
Torture only breeds hatred.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@drktmplar so what your saying is that uninformed people decide to kill american civillians for what they think is the all around american sentiment...how offen does the american military target civillian populations...i agree that we shouldnt be over there but what your saying is 2 wrongs make a right...
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 We agree on this point. The things we've done in Iraq do not right the wrong of 9/11.
I only want to ask *why* anti-American sentiment exists. When I answer that question, I want to then ask, "Do our actions improve or worsen the situation?" After 9/11, anti-American sentiment has risen, ~8000 American soldiers and maybe a million Iraqis lie dead, and our national debt has increased by over a trillion. That money could have been used to educate, heal, and develop our nation.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@drktmplar nono...see...what im saying is the attack on american civilians was the 2nd wrong...american military forces dont target civilian populations...anti-american terrorists do...while i agree we shouldnt be over there in the first place and the money spent continuing could be much better spent...the idea of "death to america" as a whole based on what the politicians do is rediculouse...the american people dont care what they do over there as long as its not an attack on us
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 And what I'm saying is that the War on Terror was the 3rd wrong. So, are you saying two wrongs don't make a right, but three do?
The ORB survey places Iraqi deaths at one million, and I guarantee you a large portion of that number is civilian deaths. And do you honestly think we bombed their capital city of Baghdad without killing civilians?
Also, as for the American Military targeting civilians, you only need to look at the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 200,000 dead, mostly civis.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@drktmplar sweet fukin christ are you serious...ok...first...i already said i dont agree with the warfront as it is...call it what you will...but to try and say WW2 was anything like whats goin on in todays world is strait moronic...honestly i cant believe you even tried to go there...wow your dumb....
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 You misunderstand me. I never said WW2 was like today. I was only replying to your statement: "american military forces dont target civilian populations"
I simply replied, "Yes they do. Here's a modern example in Iraq, and here's a historical example in Japan."
I have no idea how you thought I was saying the War or Terror and WW2 are similar situations. It seems both of us agree that such a statement is pretty dumb lol!
drktmplar 1 month ago
@bklee83
#1
Also, I feel my original post compliments your statement that: "the american people dont care what they do over there as long as its not an attack on us"
The people over there hardly even know we exist. They are mostly poorly educated people just trying to making a living like anybody else. Most people over there don't even know about 9/11 and never hated the American people. So, not only are WE fine with leaving them alone, but THEY are fine with leaving us alone too.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@drktmplar you tried to say american military targets civi pops...and used the nukes in japan 60+ yrs ago as an example...i think its pretty safe to say that we live in slightly different times...the us military doesnt target civi pops...AND before those bombs were dropped in japan for several days to weeks us planes dropped flyers all over the cities telling them what was going to happen if they didnt surrender...
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 Ah, I'm sorry. You're right. The US might not directly target civis, but it definitely still kills plenty of civis. You only need to look up specifics of the casualty demographics in Iraq to confirm this fact.
ANYHOW, the main point is not about civis. The main point is that two wrongs don't make a right, especially when the second wrong is committed against someone who doesn't even know what the first wrong was.
The other point I made was that Liberty is worth the risk of Terrorism.
drktmplar 1 month ago
@bklee83 Yes, but comparing our 2 current "wars" and World War II is comparing apples to oranges. In this case both fruit are bad of course. In our current "wars" you could argue that we are targeting civilian population in every case. For example, if Canada invaded us (cliche to keep using China as a reference for this point?) and sent all their tanks, bombs, martial-law style tactics (ie- curfew, road blocks, indefinate imprisonment, etc..) with any amount of their standing army CONT-
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX CONT- then you, as a civilian, and I do mean literally "you", presumably would get a gun, get some friends, and look for a higher organization to become part of (in this case the Taliban) in order to stop Canada from continuing to murder everyone you knew in high school. You would be told that Canada is saying to its own citizens that "you" are jealous of Canada's freedom and that "you" were part of the attack of Sept. 11th. You were not part, you only are fighting
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX because the country, even though there are many things you wish you had the chance to change about, is "your" country. With "your" family, friends, and neighbors being bombed by a country whose own soldiers don't realize that they are actually serving profiteers and warmongerers, thus fueling "your" rage against them to the point of suicide attack.
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX And all the while "you" are labeled as a terrorist who wants to bring fear and ruin to the people of a country that "you" used to wish you could vacation to.
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX i love when people jump into a convo 1/2 way threw and decide to put their 2 cents in...either way...my point is that when trying to obtain information from someone who is already willing to kill themself for their side to win...you must use unconventional interrogation tactics to get the info you need...and civi casualties who are unintentional targets are called collateral dmg...that happens...the muslim extremists on the other hand actually target civillians...
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 First of all, it is a youtube comment section... Second, what you said just now- I 100% agree with. The real issue is understanding that the "terrorism" is a symptom caused by the disease of the CIA instigating Sept. 11th, and in turn causing the "war" in Iraq. The "terrorists" before seeing their families destroyed, were civilians, and one could only hope that if we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan, will forgive us and stop attempting to be a threat.
ParalegalX 1 month ago
@ParalegalX youtube comment section or not...you have no idea what drktmplar and i were talking abour in reference to ww2...thats why i love when people decide to chime in about what is being said when they have no clue what is meant because they have no context to refer back to...
bklee83 1 month ago
@bklee83 Chimed* read my other comment I forgot to "reply" and just commented, but it was a respone to you.
ParalegalX 1 month ago
Comment removed
drktmplar 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bklee83
#2
The Patriot Act (surveillance) and the War on Terror (trillions of dollars of debt, increased taxation, less money for schools, etc.) both make ME less free. Even if Freedom (in the form of less war and surveillance) makes us an easier target for Terrorism, I say - I want my Freedom.
(...continued)
drktmplar 1 month ago
Comment removed
drktmplar 1 month ago
Comment removed
drktmplar 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bklee83
#3
I say this because cars kill 30,000-40,000 Americans per year, yet most of us accept that risk so that we can drive our cars.
Likewise, deaths from Terrorism since 9/11 are about 3000. That's 300 per year, and +90% of it happened ON 9/11. If I can accept the risk of driving a car, then I can ABSOLUTELY accept the risk of Terrorism if it means I can retain my Freedom. ♥
Lol, for the record, I prefer Public Transportation. Unfortunately, I don't live in NYC anymore. Car it is. :(
drktmplar 1 month ago
You are causing someone pain in order to force them into complying with your orders. That's pretty much the definition of torture.
PktMma 1 month ago 17
@PktMma
It looks like torture to me.
Draginvry2 1 month ago
@PktMma No the definition of Torture of is "The action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something."
It's not inflicting severe pain, but is inflicting great fear. I'm not defending it, it's immoral and that "bomb in a city" scenario doesn't justify it's use.
SkullKing11841 2 weeks ago
3 or 4 people are screaming at you, you are then dragged by your hair and someone rips your blind fold off while holding your face against the floor and a snarling dog is brought to your face. The lights go out, and you are blind folded again and strapped to a table, they then begin to waterboard you. The psych torture occurred over 4 hours, with the changing of cells and screaming happening over about 7 minutes prior to be tabled. This is how it is actually done.
PirateSygnal 1 month ago
He should of done this more real world. Here is how it is actually done. You are blind folded in a cell. You hear faint screams and dogs barking for hours. The cell door slams open, you are dragged by the hair and thrown into another cell. They tie your hands, and someone is shouting at you inches from your face in a language you don't understand, the door slams and the screams you heard before are louder (they are on tape). Seconds later the door slams open again and...
PirateSygnal 1 month ago
So thumb screws weren't torture since they didn't "invoke blood".
D8956 1 month ago
cant the person breathe from the mouth?/
bindasbolre 2 months ago
@bindasbolre That's what I was thinking
lTsCaLLeDSkIlLZz 2 months ago
@bindasbolre why dont you try it and find out, maybe this whole water-boarding thing is just a joke after all right?
umbrellaBuddha 2 months ago
Sleep deprivation was used as a method of torture, I don't recall that "invoking blood." Does that make it anything less than torture? Absolutely not. Only a complete moron, imbecile, and simpleton would ever deny methods such as this to be torture. It is putting the mind and body under incredible strain, fear, and pain. Just because you don't physically hurt someone, does not, in any stretch of the imagination, mean they are not in pain.
DefeatedElitist 2 months ago
Have this done to you, every day, for hours. ...You WILL consider it torture. You will not care to find another word for it.
JacksInn 2 months ago 3
@JacksInn i like the way you put it, what else would you fucking call it after months of this being done to you hours a day?
umbrellaBuddha 2 months ago
James Franco
kookooktchoo 2 months ago
When he said 'Is this considered torture?' the soldier should have broken his nose with the butt of his rifle. Y'know, just so the simulation is realistic.
TenWhoWereTaken 2 months ago 3
theres a way you can last a minute doing that...i searched this up and one way to last a min is by holding as much air as possible and putting ur nose agianst ur upper lip...so basically the thing you should in this situation is to make your lips point up so you can block out water from going through...
5swordmaster 2 months ago
@5swordmaster Not likely to be possible in the real event this is happening to you lol...
coolm3productionsXD 2 months ago
@5swordmaster that's impossible to do. you cannot completely seal off your nostrils with an airtight seal using only your upper lip unless you are inhaling rapidly at the same time, which you cannot do with water pouring up your nose of you will drown. nice try, though.
angelfoodlips 2 months ago
@angelfoodlips it is not impossible, and the inhaling has no part in it. All depends on your face
2xnkote 2 months ago
notice playboy channel made this, what u dont see is theres a big orgy after where the guy in the amy gear changes it 4 gimp suit, and the all in enjoy a diffent verson of water sports
BonjourGorgeous 2 months ago
I would like to waterboard Obama and Nancy Pelosi until they sing (God Bless America) and (Sweet Home Alabama.)
hawkermustang 2 months ago
@hawkermustang LOL!
ts53shea 2 months ago
Chuck Norris was bored while water boarding.
tperley 3 months ago
such irony from the dumb PHD torture practitioner
anothaview 3 months ago
2:26 "I started doing yoga earlier this year" "That won't help you here." ROTFL!!!!!
PsionicX1 3 months ago 2
Why does he have a girl name? Well, lol My name is Gabriel and I am a girl. I was named after the angel. but its still weird that he has a girl name.
YurrahAlHadi 3 months ago
He's wrong.
ICP is so bad I can't do more than 15 seconds of it.
SpoonfullofSandrock 3 months ago
lol 6 seconds.
Rayzkevin 3 months ago
"DROWNDING"?!?
544001 3 months ago 12
This guy's just a pussy. Kalik Shaek Muhammed lasted over 2 minutes.
VitalSigns1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VitalSigns1 His life depended on it
Tris67 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YOUR A BITCH not even 10 seconds.And you look like a fag to. go suck a dick you little bitch faggot!
TheSabrel2 3 months ago
I think he didn't ask one of the most important questions, has the torturer ever had it done to him?
Rage4123 3 months ago
"What's the fear?"
"Drownding."
Fuuuuuuck...
pretzelzetzel 3 months ago 2
@pretzelzetzel drownding?
77thebob77 3 months ago
@77thebob77 lol
Bpowderr 3 months ago
psychological torture is as bad if not worse than physical torture.
thehomelessguy 3 months ago
torture for oil, yay heroes of America!
ShortTube 3 months ago
This is a good vid, i liked his explanation afterwards.
Ch3ls3yxxSubs 3 months ago
Everybody saying people that fail this in seconds are "pussies" or shit like that need to STFU.
Until you've done this, take their word for it.. It is complete hell.
jamcow3 3 months ago
FFS! What a pussy! He did not even give it a fair go. What a massive faggot.
archive303 4 months ago
@archive303 Put your money where your (internet) mouth is. Make the same bet, and do it, pussy.
kingofgimp 3 months ago
@kingofgimp No problem, just find me some people and I will quite happily go through with it.
archive303 3 months ago
@archive303 Find you some people... like... the people in the video we are watching? Done, there they are.
kingofgimp 3 months ago
"some consider it torture" probley everyone it ever happened to and everyone who doesnt want it too happen to them. Panic and fear are two off most painfull things there are .Torturer nice mum must be proud .
wilburjmc 4 months ago
I bet I can stand it.
zillajratomicray 4 months ago
ive practiced yoga that wont help you here hahaha
mrcooliowhip 5 months ago
what dumbshits...
piggypals33 5 months ago
breath out of your ears
cucumber288 6 months ago 34
Perfect for terrorists. They fly planes into our buildings and kill our troops don't expect sympathy from us. Unless you're a liberal who is worried about "torture".
Norie92 6 months ago
@Norie92 Or you're a Christian who's worried about "torture." The moment we stoop to this, we've already lost.
dontbearetard 6 months ago
@Norie92 Why is it only terrorism when someone else does it? Who is, 'They?' How would it feel to find out you were torturing and killing, the 'wrong' people? Go read: A Timeline of CIA Atrocities
By Steve Kangas [don't be confused when he speaks about communism, anything can be placed in that spot, like religious extremist, any religion will do.
artzilla 6 months ago
@artzilla Well terrorism has a definition and by "they" i mean terrorists. They do it for politically and religiously motivated reasons. I dislike the CIA as much as you do, it sounds like. Even if their attack was due to blowback they still killed innocent civilians, not even soldiers. For that, they are guilty and they must endure harsh questioning. I'm not saying burn them with cattle branders, I'm saying using waterboarding is the best we have without actually leaving bruises.
Norie92 6 months ago
@Norie92 lol we need to be doing this to our own men in the government that planned 9/11, it was in inside job. And before you respond to me, educate yourself on what really happened that day. Good day, sir.
amknafla 6 months ago
@amknafla And what evidence points to 9/11 being an inside job? i have seen the loose change documentary and others but they don't give an explanation to why they think the government did it.
Norie92 6 months ago
@Norie92 we don't need to know WHY the government did it, even though it was obviously a scare tactic so we could start an unnecessary war. We just need to know IF the government did it, and there is an overwhelming amount of evidence against our government, I could provide you with links but its impossible over youtube. It honestly doesn't take much to find on google though.
amknafla 6 months ago
@Norie92
You're having both fingers in your ears singing "Lalalalalala!".
trakkaton 5 months ago
@trakkaton No I don't, I've seen the 9/11 documentaries. Multiple ones that say the government did it. I just want conclusive evidence THEY did it. It could have been CIA, which they're known to do this bull crap. Operation Northwoods.
Norie92 5 months ago
@Norie92
Well, it's obvious that it's an inside job, and it's obvious that the secret service (Bush continuing to read "My pet goat" at an disclosed location) as well as the military (NORAD stand down) as well as the government (promoting those who "failed", killing and threatening those who "succeeded") and the 9/11 commisson (who said that they were set up to fail and accepted it) were complicit. So who cares who started it and who was going along with it? Btw OP Northwoods = government.
trakkaton 5 months ago
@trakkaton Another thing I learned is that it was uncovered during the 9/11 investigations that they had caught one of the terrorists on Illegal immigration but instead of deporting him the FBI ordered him let go. Saw it on Fox News documentary the other night. But anyways yes there is reasonable suspicion but there is still too much doubt to make a fair, unbiased judgment I think. Yeah Op Northwoods was gov't but i'm saying the CIA would have carried it out.
Norie92 5 months ago
lol a solid 5 seconds
xx1vincent1xx 6 months ago
Torture is torture it dosnt matter if it's mantel or physical .should only be used on real serious criminals to get intel
khumepp 9 months ago
"Nothing's so bad that you can't stand 15 seconds of it." Incredible BS.
"It's not torture, it's invoking fear" Incredible BS.
Two imbeciles.
trakkaton 1 year ago 38
@trakkaton try it and then say BS
jsf525 6 months ago
@jsf525 There is a Standing offer from Keith Olbermann to Sean Hannity, who claims that waterboarding is not torture, to try it for $1000.00 per second, and then say it is not torture. :)
artzilla 6 months ago
@jsf525
Learn to read.
trakkaton 5 months ago
@trakkaton Let do it to you, 128 times, fuck wad.
michaelsterling37 5 months ago
@michaelsterling37
Learn to read.
trakkaton 5 months ago
@trakkaton That's the point of this.....
ttmet 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trakkaton..... your an idiot.. i know you dont think so and you wont believe me, but you are.. you are the type of person that is whats wrong with america.
The503homie 3 months ago
@trakkaton If you do this yourself...It truly does invoke fear in your head and feels almost like you are 50 ft underwater, but it doesn't actually even feel like torture to be honest, it happens fast and is over even quicker.
Tenchi10 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tenchi10
You don't even know the definitions of the words you are trying to use.
trakkaton 3 months ago
@Tenchi10 The difference is when you do it yourself you can decide when to stop. When this is done as torture there are no metal objects in your hands or code words to make it end.
bandmedal 2 months ago 3
tu parles anglais?
The7MISSFITS 1 year ago