Kinetic drive, reactionless propulsion system, test

[TheNeokorben]

GREAT WORK ,YOUR FINGER IS MESSING UP THE SCALE TRY REMOTE CONTROL,THEN GET BIGGER WEIGHTS,LET US SEE HOW THE SCALE WILL CHANGE OR NOT,ANY WAY GREAT WORK STILL

[okdon]

nice work

[okdon]

The way to do it was discovered in the late 1930's. If you get a chance to see the video of the luner lander take off from the moon watch it closely and you will see no rocket blast only a burst from the explosive bolts that seperat it from it's base. My info comes from a nasa enginer that is no longer with us. we are not supposed to know this. If you make one that works you won't have it for long.

[TheScottGDietz]

Is there some reason you didn't create the spinning arm so that the machine didn't strike itself? I've seen these machines work, here on youtube. Am I wrong?

[johnroach1]

Go to approachconcepts "dot" com for real inertial propulsion.

[z1zaz]

Gyros transduce via a 90 degree rule - spin and rotate about two different dimensional axes to generate force along the third

However that force will not be free in space because it has a ground application reference

You need 2 counter-rotating (for dynamic balance) gyros on the same axis to be spun around (90 degree) the centre point of their axis, to generate force

Make 4 of same at corners of a square with 2 mutually counter rotating to free the platform forces from Earth ground reference

[ollieoniel]

damn i really hoped one would work. maybe try the first one with the giros facing forward rather than out or maybe attach them to the wheel for only half a turn so the create a torque that resists being turned for half a turn then they can stay in the same axis for the rest of the turn (maybe it would create trust 90 degrees to the axel). anyways its nice to see someone do proper tests that dont have vibration errors and the likes.

[LouistheHedgehog]

I think the third one doesn't work because it hits the center, affecting the rotating weight.

[frankensteinmoneymac]

I like that you did these experiements...shows dedication, not to mention honesty about what youve found. Another 1 which would be fun to try (i do not remember the origin of this Idea) is a tube that throws two weighted balls with equal force down its length both ways at the same time, except one end is decelerated slowly by a spring(or similiar) & the other hits a hard wall. Alledgedly it will move in 1 direction. I SERIOUSLY doubt it is feasable as propulsion, but it would be a fun & EZ exp.

[ZaitsevskyA]

@frankensteinmoneymac

My article on that subject is placed on myresearch. lt

[frankensteinmoneymac]

@ZaitsevskyA Really? cool I would love to check it out.....but where do I find it? Is myresearch a web address? Do I look under ZaitsevskyA?

[ZaitsevskyA]

@frankensteinmoneymac web address is shown in this video. Menu ARTICLES.

[jehovajah]

Thus whatever force that is nullified is infinitesimal and infinitesimal as to periodicity. A small unbalancing force in one direction will thus be perpetuated as in outer space, and will require a frictionless frame to be made visible.

[jehovajah]

The essential action is a disturbance of equilibrium in an equilibrium field also called an inertial space. If the gyro disturbs the equilibrium, then all the other forces are what are adjusting . To take advantage of this adjustment the objects framing the fyro are what must have freedom of relative movement. `if the angular momentum is almost zero this is because that degree of freedom is small or negligible in the equilibrium field,

[jehovajah]

eric Laithwaite claims that these systems do not generate thrust but rather a lack of it, So one should not be attempting to force a gyro to move but rather easing the motion of the attached body.

[ZaitsevskyA]

Laithwaite Eric, patent US5860317 "Propulsion system", claim 1: A method of moving a vehicle in a first direction, said method comprising the steps of:

connecting a gyroscope to said vehicle;

causing said gyroscope to follow a path which involves at least one precession-dominated portion and at least one translation-dominated portion, ...

[ZaitsevskyA]

...wherein in the precession-dominated portion, the mass of the gyro moves in the said first direction and an associated first movement of the vehicle in substantially the opposite direction to said first direction occurs, and, in the translation-dominated portion, the mass of the gyro moves with an associated second movement of the vehicle in substantially said first direction,

wherein said second movement is greater than said first movement and hence the vehicle moves in said first direction

[z1zaz]

@ZaitsevskyA

Laithwaite was 'got-at' by the *Abominable NO-Men* !

They say that YouTube is as well ! Let's see.

[ZaitsevskyA]

throwing shape depends on rotation speed. It can be clear on some RPM, but still no thrust. Ball bearings are used everywhere in this test.

[oystla]

I suggest you try again, but force the weight to be thrown always in a certain pattern equal to he Thornson device. This is not a proper replication of Thornson.

If you check my playlist you will also find russian experimenters with similar devices with actual proulsion.

You wil not get any thrust as long as the weight is thrown irregular all over the place

[oystla]

As shown in J.L.naudins replication of the Thornson device, you need to control that the weight is at the extreme position in the forward direction during rotation. In your test the weight seems to be thrown all over the place (as seen shen you have the white dot on the weight).