Towards a Fusion Economy - World in Review · January 27, 2012 ·

[MrTGolden]

A 5-star presentation awakening the spirit of optimism last made President of the United States in the person of JFK. Yet the science of physical economy underlying this spirit is the crux of the matter and LPAC is 100% correct to claim NONE of the 2012 candidates for the office of U.S. President appears qualified to meet the challenge.

[rustyscrapper]

Ron paul IS the candidate speaking on this behalf. How? He is for free markets and de regulation. If the moon is abundant in HE3 and HE3 is extremely valuable then collecting and transporting it to earth is incredibly profitable. Private venture companies and entepreneural start ups will with NO help from any government innovate ways to do it, and make incredible profits at the same time.

The government only needs to do nothing to help.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@rustyscrapper Free markets cannot do everything. It is not profitable to build levees for New Orleans. Should we not build levees for New Orleans if no one can profit off of it? Of course not. The government does have a role to play in the economy, that is the difference between the American system that Larouche is for and the Austrian school that you apparently are for. The idea that government cannot be a force for good is a fundamentally un-American idea.

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

The free market would solve this.

The New Orleans levees would have been built by private entrepreneurs if there was a need for it.

Space exploration could also be solved by the free market. The way it stands now, private people are NOT allowed to do such things -laws against it.

Just think of astroid mining (if it's truly possible) and how the free market would handle that.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@ENDtheFED2012 Please describe for me a viable business model for building levees for profit, I would love to hear that. Your assertion that New Orleans only needs levees if the free market builds them is reprehensible.

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

If there was a need for the levees business owners in the area would pool resources to build them.

Why should I, who lives in a high-ground area, be forced to pay for them through my taxes?

[mik1984]

@ENDtheFED2012 1. So you assume there is no spill over profit for you in the fact that houses of people living downhill do not get their houses flooded? 2. Do you even understand the basics of institutional economics? Ever heard the term "Market Failure" or "Free Rider Problem"? Many investments are groundbreakingly viable even though they are unorganizable on a transactional basis via unregulated market.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@ENDtheFED2012 Just as the people in New Orleans pay taxes for YOUR highways and infrastructure. That's how America works best and has always worked best since George Washington and Alexander Hamilton.

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

Please, don't bother me with your socialist nonsense.

Move on.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@ENDtheFED2012 LOL Washington and Hamilton were socialists LOL shows how smart you are don't worry I won't waste my time with such an ignorant person who knows nothing about US history

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

Whatever it is you have to say...OK.

Now move on with your bullshit, Thanks.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@ENDtheFED2012 Good luck with your traitorous, anti-American, Austrian school of econonsense.

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

you don't know shit about economics and monetary policies.

now please just fuck off.

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@ENDtheFED2012 Actually I do I used to believe in the Austrian school too until I discovered LPAC and the American system, the true patriotic system. Its the Austrians who know nothing

[ENDtheFED2012]

@TheAntiMalthusian

so what's this 'LPAC-American system'? Is it based off of maxism/keynesian economics?

If so, it would fail.

[laroucheyouth]

@ENDtheFED2012 You can investigate people like Friedrich List who wrote a lot on the question of a national system based on what had been fought for inside the USA. Here is an article that may be useful larouchepub(dot)com/eiw/public­/2008/2008_1-9/2008-2/pdf/56-5­9_3502.pdf Even better though, here is a book written by List goo(dot)gl/aTia1

[louloub5]

ihave lost respect for this channel.....mr. paul may not want permanent bases on the moon, but defence system up there.....lets not forget, there is a good reason why they never went back there if they did go..

[69Sirdragon]

what if it took only a day to get to mars and your military is already in possession of this tech..and were not stationary in the solar system everything is spinning like a helix thru space, fun graphics =)

light n love

[steveoo5]

um... not ron paul

[ENDtheFED2012]

@steveoo5

not Dr. Paul ?

Do you mean he's not talking about this?

[steveoo5]

I disagree, we need to go backwards in technology not more crap, look up sepp holzer permaculture, earthships, dry toilets, rocket mass heaters etc etc all non labor intensive, and helps the earth not hurt it by our everyday lifew

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@steveoo5 if you think humans only harm the planet please follow your ideas to their logical conclusion and kill yourself to save the earth. As LaRouchePAC has said many times, humans are the only ones who can improve the earth. The only animal who can green the desert. Without humanity whole swaths of the earth would be lifeless desert. Nature is not capable of doing it alone. That is why it evolved man. Our creative powers are not unnatural at all, they are the point of evolution

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@steveoo5 all your ideas will lead to a drastic reduction in humanity's ability to sustain its numbers, leading to mass deaths. Perhaps that is ok for you, a necessary sacrifice to save Mother Earth, since we are "overpopulated." But that only shows the depravity of your thinking.

[steveoo5]

@TheAntiMalthusian I never said we were overpopulated, I don't think we are, but you are an idiot because the ideas I stated are the only way to acheive the ideas you have such as greening the desert. permaculture is the only way to do that, and the ideas I stated would make do the opposite of what you said you clearly have no idea what you are talking about

[TheAntiMalthusian]

@steveoo5 Actually nuclear de-salination and irrigation would do it 1000X better. And your ideas would lead to a drastic reduction in humanity's ability to sustain its large numbers if it was adopted on a worldwide scale, whether you realize it or not. The reality is that only a move towards more nuclear fission and fusion, not towards solar and compost toilets, will allow us to sustain 7-8 billion people on the planet with a reasonable comfort of living throughout the 21st century.

[hintlo1]

The earth is not perfectly round...... Shaped more like a potato.....

[hintlo1]

we never landed on the moon.......

[delerium2k]

@hintlo1 you most certainly did

[ENDtheFED2012]

@delerium2k

I have doubts that America did send men to the moon.

How did the men survive the trip through the van allen belt?

How did the men survive the radiation from the sun on the 222,000 x 2 mile trip?

[5T4RSCREAM233]

Excellent video

[hayden50]

awesome...