Added: 3 years ago
From: EdwardCurrent
Views: 30,251
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (600)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Finaly, stars on the other side of the universe explode because Adam and Eve ate an apple from a tree". He just randomly throughs that in there for good measure. I bust out laughing when he randomly came out with that.

  • Shit that's the funniest I've seen.

  • whoever dislikes this was a stupid athiest that didn't realize this was satire! the likes come from christians who think he's serious and atheists who know its satire

  • @LOGIC42369 Actually there might be some intelligent christians that realize he's poking fun. But that aside ... IMO this one compared with most of his stuff (wich I like) feel its a bit under par. Definately not one of his funnier video's

    And by the way , I never use the like or dislike button , I merely post an oppinion if I feel the need.

  • @Mk101T i wuz just troll ;p

  • Supernovas happen because Adam and eve ate an Apple from a tree?

  • The news of Adam and Eve's misdeeds must've traveled through space to those stars millions of light years away. Bwwaaaaa!!!

    Brilliantly funny stuff, Edward. Just discovered your channel. Been watching your videos all day.

  • This idiot wants attention badly maybe he should jump off a cliff or shoot himself

  • This is a joke right? Haha its like the lottery. Someone has to win even if the odds are ridiculous. Particles come together in some random Location even if the odds of it being in that location are slim. It would have to happen somewhere right? Only the weak minded try to put religious figures in control of something bigger the human race. Just wait until you die. No heaven. Just nonexistence . Blackness. The only heaven may be a dream for the few minutes your brain is active after you die.

  • god is gay

  • Holy shit, this totally fooled me, I thought you were a typical Christian instead of a satirist. xD

  • OF COURSE god is able to make light faster MUCH faster than the speed of light. He is god (duh). Now what chapter and verse is that in? Damn, I'm sure it's in here somewhere.

  • Its just dust...who gives a damn?

  • @ThesportsmediaTV hahahahaha

  • Dude, the fact that your voice doesn't sync up properly in this video is proof that you're possessed by a demon and trying to undermine Jesus. I mean, God. I mean, well, they're the same, but ... you know what I mean. Stop it!

    I'm super ... duper ... serial.

  • Oxymoron of the day: "miraculous filth"

  • The Unrelational Argument: How could ANYONE be rationally held responsible and punished for something that they had absolutely NO responsibility for and that happened LONG before they were even BORN???????

  • Senor, i think that that argument is as wrong as 2+2=5, because of... well... good ol', clean, fresh-out-of-the-bottle COMMON SENSE.

  • Lmao @ the poor cleaning lady...She spoke too much spanish

  • CHECKMATE!

  • #2 - Your dust bunny is merely lifeless matter. Whereas this universe contains life. So in order for you theory to have any grounding this dust bunny must be able to spontaneously become a real living rabbit.

    If you can show me this is possible... then I will believe your theory that this universe spontaneously appeared out of no where, from nothing, for no reason... And that lifeless matter somehow spontaneously became life.

  • There are a few small details you left out. The differences between your dust bunny and the universe:-

    #1 - The dust that formed this dust bunny was already existed, it was already there in your house all it had to do was come together. But before the universe came into existence there was NOTHING. No time no, no space. NO DUST. NOTHING.

    The chances of something spontaneously coming from something far greater outweigh the chances of something spontaneously coming from nothing.

    (continued....)

  • @servantforAllah if god can be infinite and without a maker so can the universe itself....

  • @bishopssix

    If saying 'these protons (that collided together resulting in the spontaneous existence of the universe) to be infinite and without a maker' is a plausible scientific argument... then saying GOD created the universe is just as scientific and plausible.

    You CANNOT say these protons are infinite (therefore they are not bound by the physical laws of this universe)... and yet at the same time say GOD is infinite and without a maker therefore HE doesn't exist.

    (to be continued...)

  • @bishopssix (continued...)

    Ok... so we've concluded that if it's possible for a couple of protons to be infinite then the existence of an infinite GOD is equally possible.

    Now lets look at the possibility of Intelligent Design vs Unintelligent Spontaneity...

    Tell me, what are the chances that these 2 infinite protons that are floating around in space (keep in mind how small protons are and how big space is) should randomly bump into each other.................

    (to be continued....)

  • @bishopssix (continued....)

    setting off a chain reaction, thus forming (from partials of cosmic dust) everything we see today. And (I don't think science has come up with a theory for this yet) some how these partials of cosmic dust randomly came together (just like the dust bunny!) and some how became LIFE. How (& WHY) does something that doesn't posses any life whatsoever just spontaneously become life for no reason? .....

    (to be continued........)

  • @bishopssix

    How (& WHY??) would a simple rock (or dust bunny) become a complex living cell that reproduces by cloning, writing in it's own nucleus a complex and specific code that determines the exact purpose of the cell?

    THINK LOGICALLY.. What are the chances of this happening?? It is 1:(to a number that has too many zeros to fit on entire this page)

    Now the possibility of Intelligent design...

    (to be continued.....)

  • @bishopssix

    An archaeologist on an excavation discovers a beautiful vase... What is his immediate thought? Does he assume that the dust of the ground came together and this vase spontaneously evolved (without any kind of intelligent influence)? OR does he know that this vase was created and therefore there must be a creator? Though there is no real evidence for the existence of a creator...

    (to be continued...)

  • @servantforAllah his best thought is that the vase was formed by a human

  • @bishopssix

    He cannot see the person that created it (they died several 100 years earlier)... and he doesn't find any human remains. All he has is this vase. So is it illogical for him to assume it was created by intelligent design?? If you say NO it is not illogical ... WHY?? It is just a simple vase... it consists of clay and a few simple designs that's all. Why can we not assume the dirt just spontaneously came together to form the vase..????

    (to be continued.....)

  • @bishopssix (the last part)

    Yet you find it easy to believe that the complex life forms that exist here on this earth just happened to spontaneously form from dust??

    The chance that this universe was created by intelligent design far is far more possible than for it to have spontaneously happened from dust for not apparent reason, and with NO intelligent influence.

    "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

  • Comment removed

  • @servantforAllah Your "arguments" are lame ... essentially the same rehashed garbage that's been shot down 1 ... followed by more zeros that would fit on this page. You should at least reference String Theory ... most people don't understand it well enough to know you're talking out your ass. Stop taking Albert Einsteins statements out of context and trying to make it seem as if he was as delusional as you are ... eccentric maybe, delusional, I think not.

  • @ecidnes I agree. If you mind, I think that his theories hold as much water as a can with no bottom.

  • @servantforAllah So you're saying that both science AND religion must be true?

  • @zandermanandcassymom

    Of course that's what I'm saying.

    To ignore scientific facts when they are right in front of our faces is to be blindly ignorant.

    And to believe that this amazing universe, this earth, and all the life it contains happened by pure accident - with no Designer (when something as simple as a clay vase cannot exist without a designer!) - is also blindly ignorant and illogical.

  • @servantforAllah that is such a pathetic, lame argument. who designed the designer? lol i wish i were as lucky as you.... when i die i'm just gonna be dead but judging by your name you are gonna have 40 virgins in heaven after you die. you lucky bastard!!!

  • @nilbog44

    youtube.com/ watch?v=APAn67zIuVE

  • get a life

  • your cleaning lady is probably new to America but a citizen

  • One benefit of atheism over christianity is that i don't have to believe in anything without evidence.

    Here is another:-

    I get to make decisions on who or what i like or dislike without reference to a bronze age fantasy novel.

  • God likes to make dust bunnies.

  • "Stars on the other side of the universe explode because Adam and Eve ate an apple from a tree." XD

     These videos rule!

  • God Bless you Edward Current! Showing how sinfull and corrupt our earthly world is!!

    (Just playing along!! I know it's a satire)

  • @Adlerbr12 you forgot brutal and primitive lol

  • "miraculous filth" :P well sayd hahaha

  • WHAT ARE THE the odds that an all seeing all knowing

    god would decide to make himself known to humanity by way of ignorant,

    illiterate , superstitious , desert dwellers in the sands of the middle east,

  • "God bless America" gets more funny every time. :D

  • no science stuff

  • The power of the strong force and weak force eh?

  • doesnt everyone get that this is satire?

  • at 2:21 i thought u said "checkmate, God. lol but its Godhaters.

  • I was just thinking that fundies are far less creative, even in their comments... Quoting or insulting... :D

  • this might be your best one so far Edward! Keep it up!

  • You mean boogers don't just form inside my nose by themselves.....wow....thank you god for creating new boogers each and every day for the whole world to marvel at your genius!

  • @greekkid00 Thats all a little harsh ...for a Christian ???, you really prey for this man to die , Pray, and die some more ????... that's like Really Christian , you wonder why people make Videos just like this one ...ha ha .

  • Yes, that's how they manifest their love for other... What a pity these people call themselves christians just for having read a book but have the mentality of child rapist...

  • @greekkid00

    Displaying that wonderful, benevolent, forgiving, and friendly quality that embodies so many religious people. Every time there is a post like yours I just cant help laughing.

  • @greekkid00

    Why would I prey ? I don't believe any God's exist .

    Although I must say , I would not wish any harm on anyone ...which kind of fucks up your Christians view of Atheist being free of Morality becuase of the abscence of God....and there's you with your prying and stuff hoping he dies?....what's wrong with this picture? ...., anyway I heard Anon is going to do to the Christians exactly what he did to Scientologiest ..check out ...IHATEATHEIST2 ...There watching

  • to greekkidf00...what a dusgusting comment from a disgusting excuse for a human being. besides bald heads are the shit. this is 2009. everyone is bald and it's the shiz bitch!

  • LOL! no wonder so many ppl hate YOU! the way you break religious-beliefs down to the most simplest form so that even a 4th grader can comprehend is just UTTER BRILLIANCE! i must admit i never even thought about life and the universe in that way before, comparing it with dust bunny....well done!

  • We need to save all the dust bunnies that we can from our houses and take them to the Creationism Museum for preservation.

  • mmm... that last part was just dripping with sarcasm...

    great work! :D

  • This guy is brilliant. Much respect!

  • Brilliant!

  • Genius!

  • hehehe dust bunny :D been a long time since he made a vid wish he makes more of this.

  • Dust bunnies are from god? .............. YESSSSSSSSSSS I am so preaching the word of the dust bunnies. lol. i love this guy

  • go fk urself.......im not saying god doesnt exist but its just frekin dust stop freking preaching to youtube no one gives a crap. IF I WANNA BELEIVE IN GOD I WILL AND IF I DONT I WONT.......... and isnt there a chance, a slim chance all of this is coincidence? i mean it has an equal chance that some supernatural force with no origin created this? think it over really hard, and then preach to youtube from your moms basement in the biblestrip of kansas

  • I sense a great lack of sense of humor in you. God bless all of us atheists aren't so dumb. Edward is an atheist, you numbskull.

  • it's comedy dude... take a DEEEEEEEP breath

  • do you know what sarcasm is? doesn't look like it.

  • Holy shit its just fucken dust...it is completely random. FUCKEN STUPID! The planets formed by gravity, not by themselves or by some other divine being. NO THE BIBLE IS NOT CORRECT!!! If its mans fault for disease...then why the fuck did god put us here this is all bull shit! NOOOO stars do not blow up because of Adam and Eve. Fucken crackpot

  • I really hope you are just kidding, I sense no sarcasm in your comment.

  • The crackpot part I was joking, the rest Iam dead serious! And dont call me an atheist because I am not! I believe in science. I believe in Jesus because he was proven to be real, using science. I mean there are definitely stories from the bible that are true, and that actually could have happened. But as far as the creation of earth and the universe... I have to go with the scientific facts!

  • Do you know what "satire" is? How in fuck hell could you take this video seriously? It's called comedy, he is making fun of Creationists. Did you also watch an Onion news video and actually think Shawn Johnson was euthanized because she injured her leg? And no, Jesus was not proven to be real, what science are you speaking of? Nevermind, what's the point in arguing? I feel like I'm playing chess with a lobotomy patient. Just please consider having a vasectomy so you cannot spawn another dumbass.

  • @doinblow I laughed my ass off when I read the bottom

  • Jesus is NOT proven to have lived. Actually out of dousins of contemparary historians living in the same area as Jesus supposedly lived don't mention him with a word. The few (about 3 I think) that do mention him none lived at the same time and they were also not considered to be true historians.

  • really? i always thought he existed but his miracles were over exaggerated.

  • 1st of all, he is satirical, 2nd, who or what created gravity?

  • Gravity is still a theory, isn't it? idk

  • i think it is, but it is not-contested. not sure though so dont take my word

  • To say it will always be a theory is a stretch, one day they will find just what they need to prove these theory's.

  • This is a common misconception:

    In science the word "theory" doesnt mean the same as it does in common english. Its not some vague guess or unproven idea. Its a comprehensive and rigorously investigated framework supported by masses of evidence and reason. To become a theory a hypothesis must withstand the skepticism and scrutiny of the entire scientific community for many years

    Gravity, evolution, etc will always be theories: they earned it.

    (unless of course they're proven wrong)

  • >Gravity, evolution, etc will always be theories: they earned it.

    >(unless of course they're proven wrong)

    Or they are proven correct. They won't be theories then. They'll be laws.

  • 1)

    no they wont.

    Laws & theories are different, and one cannot become the other.

    A theory can never be proven correct, you can become 99.99999999% sure that it is correct (as is the case with evolution), but there will always be that tiny tiny little margin for doubt.

    A law is the description of a simple cause and effect action, for instance Hook's law:

    F = -kx (for linear elastic materials)

    That is an observation; you can test it again and again and the numbers will always fit that equation

  • 2)

    A theory is different, in that it is much more complicated and cannot be expressed as a mathematical equation were experimentation could produce all the required numbers for both sides. A theory is an idea, a framework, a way of looking at the situation. It describes the process of how things work (where as a law describes what happens), and can be used to make predictions (the real power of a theory).

  • 3)

    It works somewhat like:

    "If planets were formed through a protoplanetary disk (a theory), then we would expect planets to have certain properties, like a rate of spin, a range of densities, fairly regular orbits, etc, etc, etc." So astronomers study the planets, measure these properties, and then compare them to the results expected by the theory, if they match then its another feather in that theories cap. If they don't then the theory is wrong in some respect (or entirely).

  • 4)

    So in summary:

    Laws describe What happens.

    Theories describe How and Why it happens.

  • thanks for that thorough explanation between the two! :)

  • @Isanion Gravity is a Law, Evolution is a theory

  • Comment removed

  • @TheRockof90s The "rules" within a theory are called laws, gravity is not a law, it is a theory.

  • @musacworld erm no, a scientific law is something that has been proved and is accepted as true by the scientific community, a scientific theory is an unproven explanation for something that is recognized by the scientific community as a possible explanation.

  • @TheRockof90s Is that why there is more evidence supporting evolution than there is to support gravity?

  • Life evolves is definately a fact , But mans intellect of today evolving from amoeba's is not a fact. Neither is the creation of life out of non life .

    But on the gravity thing , Evolution has laws just as Gravity has laws ... meaning observable evidence of it in action.

  • jump out of a plane and let me know the results

  • Are you a slow adult??? This is satire.... COMEDY... omg I am ashamed I walk the earth with you tools.... Baaaaaabaaaaaa

    fucking sheep

  • I actually know people like this. So maybe I took him serious...I apologize

  • yeah, someone like this tried to convert me. It was sad.

  • Sometimes it is hard to tell, creationist are so stupid.

  • poor people with no spanish cleaning lady LOL

  • May TIM (The Invisible Man) bless you Edward. I'm going to clasp my hands together and talk to my imaginary friend for you.

    love the satire.

  • because they wish to be.

  • Beautifully done. Young-earth creationists and fundies give God a bad name.

    Oh, and did you know that most of humanity is going to burn in hell because two people at an apple? Crazy ain't it?

  • tthey're gonna burn in hell i agree with you

  • hey some one help me! i found something it is white fuzzy and it had like a ball in it that is a greenish brownish coler and i dont no wat it was but it flowed from wind and its living cuz it moves wen i go up to it runs and it has no feet but its not the wind! wat is it and i killed it ! but it was cute ware can i find them is it just weird dust bunny hellllllpppppppppppppppp me sooooooonnn

  • Comment removed

  • The way you say it, it sounds so wonderfully ridiculous!!

    Thanks!

  • David Cross/Billy Bob Thornton gives some great insight. Who knew??

  • Everytime we masturbate, Jesus kills another dust bunny ?

  • WHAT

  • Stars on the other end of the universe explode because Adam and Eve ate an apple from a tree.

    Brilliant.

  • fluffyman6, you want him to die over a video?

  • What did you just say?

  • he said "i hope u die" can't you read?

  • ist dust dead skin and hair from our bodies? then dust isn't random like edward said. dust dosen't just apear willy nilly i takes TIME for the dust to form in clumps.

  • But the dust bunnies always look the same which shows I.D.

  • Its funny how there are Christian adverts at the bottom of the video (: lol

  • why in some of your videos you say "checkmate, god hater"? cuz i don't hate God, cuz he doesn't exit...(or that's how most of the people name atheist?)

  • He's mocking the many christians who (wrongly) refer to atheists as 'god haters'. Many christians can't seem to grasp that we don't hate their god... we can't hate something that we don't believe exists.

    What atheists CAN do is hate the negative effects caused by religion, as well as the negative messages spread by those religions regarding murder, slavery, bigotry, homophobia etc.

  • @inspire27 I only know 3 other atheists not including me. The rest of the people in my class are christian, lutheran, and there is one person in the other class who is Jewish.

  • @inspire27

    the anunnaki reptilians are< your gods

  • I just found this guy today and Im addicted. What a fantastic analogy! I love it.

  • What the hell is this guy talking about?

  • Why you hatin on ED. He is just trying to show the idiocy of religous thought.

  • What Christian would claim to be from the image of God and forsake their fellow man, "sail1993?" Surely you're not JUDGING us.

    The HYPOCRISY you reflect is the reason I lost my faith before I was 10 years old.

  • "tigrress" almost everyone that losses there faith lost it at a young age. It when your young your mind is truly open. The problem to meny parents try to close there childrens minds. Parents force them to pray and brain wash them.

  • hello! your cleaning lady was not Spanish...she was probably Mexican...and she speaks Latin...seeing that she comes from Latin American. duh! Checkmate, you dumb bunny!

  • Latin is a dead language, people in Latin America don't speak Latin. *Facedesk* They speak Portuguese or Spanish.

  • ay pobrecito, no me intiendes papi?

  • Beans and disease to you too!

  • Quoi ? Qu'est-ce tu dis ? Je ne comprandes pas . Zut alors !

  • Actually Edward, todays biblical scholors think the forbiden fruit that Adam and Eve ate was a promgranit, not an apple. Apple shows up in some early scripture, but originally it was just an unspecified fruit, the most logical of which would have been the pomigranit.

  • dhushw, source?

  • Do you mean pomegranate? (pomigranit) Granite is used in conjunction with building, pomi used in hair products, maybe Adam and Eve were homebuilders and hairdressers....for kids attending the (promgranit), Orwell was correct!

  • Logical? Oh like the snake that told them to eat it?

  • 18,000 views only for this great video, and Bill O'Reilly has millions of viewers, we live in a very delusional world, sad , sad, sad, Ed keep up the cause you are awesome

  • I second and, if I could, third that statement!

  • I know religious people that believe that "the sun is made out of fire and that it is impossible for that fire to burn with out oxygen and there is no oxygen in space" LOL no joke they don't even know enough that the sun is made out of plasma. And they want to tell me I am wrong about believing the big bang and that they are right

  • fire is plasma

  • Fire is a chemical reaction of oxygen and some other fuel and the temp is only in the 100s or 1000s but plasma is the 4th state of matter in the temps of 1000000s range and up. Big diffrence. They believe that god is fueling the sun magically

  • lol at sail1993 calling us neanderthals. and you believe in God

    Epic Paradox right there

  • Keep up the G(o)od work!

    - Satan

  • "scientifically impossible" NOT!!

    "1 in 1 followed by a trillion 0es" is STILL a chance

  • exactly heance the universe, because we have chances and odds though does not give christians the ability to declare that a god thing exists, because there's a chance, to say that would mean we know what exists or what this thing would be that exists as a god thing, the whole idea is absurd sorry believers, checkmate

  • so you don't know how evolution works?

  • Yes I know how evolution is presumed to work. I also know we have an apendix (sp) we no longer need. If man survives it may disappear in 10,000 years for lack of use. What's your point? Your not really responding to my comments.

  • It's late and I need sleep. I'll check back on this discussion tomorrow. Ciao.

  • the point is evolution DOES explain "the human mind and its ability to think, reason out a problem, create, the human heart and its ability to reason right from wrong, to love, hate and grieve, to feel compassion, guilt or remorse, to feel joy and sadness, friendship, loyalty, and loneliness"

    believe it or not.

  • « Yes I know how evolution is presumed to work. I also know we have an apendix (sp) we no longer need. If man survives it may disappear in 10,000 years for lack of use. »

    That is not how evolution works, that's one of its effects.

  • Ok, your most basic of emotions are fight and flight, and these are present in all animals. A pigeon will make a calculation when attacked, on whether it can win over the attacker, and decide either to fight or run away. Other emotions are an extension of this. Compassion, guilt and remorse are easily demonstarated in a dog. Guilt - when they run off when they know they did wrong. Compassion - when they save their owner from a burning building. (And remorse is the same as guilt)

  • Why don't you try this experiment. Take a radio apart, place all of its components on the counter and wait. See it puts itself back together. I doubt it would happen. Takes intelligent design to do it.

  • molecules do not behave like macroscale objects. Don't you know this? They behave a lot more like magnets than anything else. Self assembly even with inorganic molecules is common. Science is our friend. It makes us smarter. healthier ,live longer travel faster farther longer easier, communicate sounds images data files across interplanetary space. THAT'S INTELLIGENCE.

  • Your reply makes no sense whatsoever. The components of a radio are not man made. They all evolved from a combination of components already present on earth. If they were taken apart and put into their simplest forms it would take intelligent design to form them into a radio.

  • "They all evolved from a combination of components already present on earth"

    explain. What radio parts reproduce with variation?

  • (This is a several page response due to character limit. Please wait till the end to respond.) With all due respect, the more you question, the more you prove yourself wrong. What exactly do you mean? Are we talking about the intelligent design of a tube radio? A transistor radio? A car radio? A CB Radio? A Ham Radio? A satelite radio? All are different, but essentially accomplish the same purpose. They send and or receive radio signals, and they have all evolved by intelligent design.

  • Human intelligent design.

    My point is that something so complex does not comes together for no reason. Nor does it come together without a reason. The reason for the creation of the radio was to further communication. It takes higher intelligence to accomplish it. Humans certainly have more intelligence than a radio (which actually has none). Just as a computer is only as smart as those who program it. Which says a lot about Microsoft.

  • Wonderful irony as usual.

  • i wanna know how you made your calculations on the chance of a dust bunny forming, if you are telling the truth please send me a message on how you found that statistic

  • It's a joke....

  • Response to thien0995

    True that it's a joke. The user you responded to might even realize that. But you never know, every other satire Edward has done was based on actual theistic beliefs.

    It would be interesting to anyone, especially anti-theists, if that is a real calculation.

  • I guess I'd love to see the math too! It would be interesting if those statistics were true.

  • it's just all the individual probabilities multiplied together. you would need the actual values. i would say there are actually an infinite number of possible dust bunny "shapes" due to the continuous nature of space.

  • great satire of the arguement of incredulity..

    5 stars

  • LOLZ