This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No, I'm saying it because with it as it is, only the absolute best players have a reason to attend tournaments. Give slightly lesser players a chance, and you have larger tournaments, and larger prize pools.
Considering how tournament rules are decided by popular opinion, I'd say you're wrong. If you can't win a match based on your own skill level, then you don't deserve to win.
I figure, a tournament is spose to be decided on skill? This aint a lottery...
If it were spose to be luck based we would be putting a land mine on each side of a tennis court during wimbeldon, jst pray that you aint the one to step on it first
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matches like this are the reason items need to be forced ON in tournaments. There needs to be some element of randomness to it.
MewtwoStruckBack 4 years ago
your just saying that cause you suck balls you stupid noob
R2Rshadow 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, I'm saying it because with it as it is, only the absolute best players have a reason to attend tournaments. Give slightly lesser players a chance, and you have larger tournaments, and larger prize pools.
MewtwoStruckBack 4 years ago
Considering how tournament rules are decided by popular opinion, I'd say you're wrong. If you can't win a match based on your own skill level, then you don't deserve to win.
adambomb1337 4 years ago 8
I figure, a tournament is spose to be decided on skill? This aint a lottery...
If it were spose to be luck based we would be putting a land mine on each side of a tennis court during wimbeldon, jst pray that you aint the one to step on it first
enneeeeee 4 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not very exciting... they play too tactical
Blackl3ad3r 4 years ago
good match....very entertaining
afrothundah87 4 years ago 3