In 5:36 he's spot on when he says, about "what should we cut?" That is so American idiot way. To when things ain't good, and getting down and changing your life, changing your ways, and changing who you are, it's a hell'va allot easier to blame someone else.
The former republican Rep Tom Daivs has the amnesia typical of his party lately. When W Bush took over we had a projected surplus and in less than a year he squandered it putting us back in debt.
I don't understand what the preoccupation is with money in America, I don't even use half my money and I make not even a quarter of what these people make. What are these people so interested in that's so expensive?
I love that BIll T Jones is being the consummate artist in this video. Just sitting back and observing the human interaction and making those connections in his head that help create his work.
That girl is an idiot. Each time she can't defend her position, she claims it was a joke, etc. She can't hold her own in a debate on any topic with Bill Maher.
You always hear "It's not their money" as if the country could function on a 0% tax rate and everything over 0% is theft. Well, it can't! Everything would implode! So that argument is meaningless! If you want to argue for lower taxes, talk about results, not just 'they don't deserve it.' As if Obama is just taking all the money and giving it to himself. Greedily hoarding all those negative trillions.
god why do shows keep putting dumb eye-candy on camera?! they are so stupid with annoying voices. so tiresome seeing them spout canned crap without much substance. was amusing the 1st 3x.
The adoration that Charlie Sheen gets at this point is typical of the American psyche. Pay so much attention to a waste of human space and completely ignore the fact that it's the excesses, drugs, and mental breakdown that should be the issue. But he's famous, and can do no wrong. I feel sorry for the guy that he thinks people actually love him, when secretly they are just pointing and laughing at him.
Why are do Americans feel as though because they like a job someone does, the American get to judge a person in their personal life.
YOU LIKE THE JOB HE DOES ON HIS SHOW, LIKE WHEN THE PIZZA GUY GETS THERE ON TIME WITH THE RIGHT PIZZA.IF HE DOES HIS JOB GOOD (EITHER MAKING ME LAUGH OR BRINGING MY PIZZA)THEN IT's ALL GOOD. IF THE MESS UP?? All GOOD. EITHER WAY WE DON"T GET TO JUDGE THE PERSONAL LIVES OF COMPANY EMPLOYEES.
If you can successfully defend a drug-addled, loudmouthed moron like Charlie Sheen (which this chick did not do)... wow, you're good.
He is such a fucking waste of space and the amount of praise he received by guys my age for "being awesome and telling it how it is" is such a testament to how low society will stoop when it comes to so-called "role models".
what IS it with tea party/right wing american politicians? Totally disagree with them but they are smoking hot!! Remember Famke Janson? (chick from 007 flick Goldeneye?). That's the American version with the beauty but zero brains!!
@musicalglenn Hey great comparison man! Good eye.After u mentioned Famke Jansen I was like hell yeah! She so resembles her.But then u know what they say abt women and brains right? Inversely proportional.Beautiful women,mostly dumb,bimbos.Brilliant women,not so good looking.
Jeez look at these Republicans trying to convince the Tea Party about what they really want. No, the old Tea Party memebers certainly do NOT want their entitlment programs cut, what person over 65 would?
If you are collecting Social Security, unemployment bens, Medicare/Caid or Welfare of any kind the YOU ARE A SOCIALIST. Maher is right--if you hate "Socialism" then STOP COLLECTING NOW and GIVE IT ALL BACK!
We should not measure people by their money. What a sad place where those carers that look after people with disabilities and help others in poverty receive no limelight and have no value on our society. But a drunk on a sitcom is admired. Just sad thats all.
@factvfiction it's because no one cares. A drunk on a sitcom is funny, he flys us away from our ordinary middle class. Only people who have connections with disabled or poor people genuinely care about them. Truth, there's money where people want to spend it.
Al Franken is a comedian? Aren't comedians supposed to be funny? Being elected does not qualify him as a success, just a political leech. Franken graduated with a poli-sci degree. The study of political science is nothing more than the recitation of lefty bullshit and drug abuse. All that qualifies him for is being a liberal.
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
you pay the lowest taxes in the world, and still you complain. How are you going to continue to have a military 2 times the size of the rest of the world if you have no revenue.. borrow it from china? Good luck with that plan.. genius.
@aegisgfx - Being from the former Soviet Union, if you had any brains you would know that socialism doesn't work - as eastern europe and Russia suffers through a 20+ year hangover from 70 years of state socialism. Dunce.
@RicPhlare Who in the United States is supporting socialism? It seems, from what I know, Russia is moving in the right direction. Putin and Medvedev make a good team. The USA is moving in the wrong direction, and that direction isn't even socialism. It's just too much military spending, too much reliance on foreign goods, and too much debt.
@AWesome61696 - Anybody supporting President Marx is supporting socialism. Entitlement spending is about 60% of federal spending and will only increase as boomers age. The US borrows about 40 cents of every dollar it spends. In short, revenue only covers entitlements and that will end soon. Do the math - all other spending is deficit and therefore, new debt. You can cut miltary spending to zero and it won't matter.
con't - The so-called spending cuts aren't cuts - they are just reductions in planned increases. If the US did nothing but freeze spending at current levels - using government math it would be a $9.5 Trillion cut out to 2020 - 4 X the size of the phony cuts in the debt deal. Government spending has to be cut - reforms in entitlement spending is needed - starting with repealing ObamaCare.
@RicPhlare Okay. So we have some upcoming fiscal problems. Cutting military spending will help ALOT buddy. Raising taxes on the rich will help as well. And reforming entitlement programs, cutting the buracracy, will also help. And where do you draw the conclusion that the current president should be labeled "President Marx." That's just ignorant.
@AWesome61696 - Fiscal problems? Like saying Rosie O'Donnell needs to lose 5 pounds.. You've said nothing but the standard lefty rhetoric that Obama's teleprompter says. Soaking the rich will simply encourage them to leave the US or move their assets offshore, taking investment and jobs. Why don't you people understand that? The 'progressive' tax system is half the problem - it punishes incentive and encourages cheating.
con't 1- - The top 10% of taxpayers pay about 50% of the total. The top 25% pay about 85%. The top 50% pay 97% of the total. How much is enough? Soaking the rich does not work. Almost 50% of Americans pay nothing. The problem is runaway spending. Don't expect Obama to do anything about entitlements other than increase them - Obamacare. As far as the military goes - with the US winding down Iraq, Obama unilaterally & illegally puts the US into another war in Libya.
@RicPhlare Do you know why the top 10% of taxpayers pay so much? In 2004, the wealthiest 25% of US households owned 87% ($43.6 trillion) of the country’s wealth, while the bottom quartile held no net wealth at all. Plus the both 50% don't pay income tax. They do pay payroll tax which goes to SS and medicare.Gas and other federal excise taxes. There also state and local taxes. (the rich pay so much in income tax because they earn the most and by a very large percentage. )(cont1)
@RicPhlare (cont1)300,000 Americans collectively enjoyed almost as much income as the bottom 150 million Americans. The top 1 percent received 21.8 percent of all reported income in 2005, up significantly from 19.8 percent the year before and more than double their share of income in 1980. The peak was in 1928, when the top 1 percent reported 23.9 percent of all income.(however i do again entitlements will have to be reviewed and modified from their current forms. Just like military spending)
@aegisgfx - The only real difference between socialism and communism is that socialism provides an illusion of democracy. In socialism, people have a choice between any number of left-wing socialist parties who will all do the same thing.
Listen to the interview with Bachmann. There was no humor in her tone at all. If that was conservative humor then it's true, conservatives are not funny.
This is a great example of bullshit Ayn Rand worship of "exceptional" people. Yes, we have to support the elite, because they are BETTER than us! Elite people like... Charlie Sheen... and... Bernie Madoff and... Paul Allen... wait... those "exceptionals" are total assholes! Supporting the elite is supporting greed. If you don't take the pie from Scrooge, he'll eat the whole thing! THAT'S why we regulate! Because we CANNOT trust capitalist to be honest.
The crazy right-wing support of Charlie Sheen shows YET AGAIN how they are ALWAYS wrong! He is a sad, soon-to-declare-bancruptcy, has-been, but just months ago, jagweed frat boys & girls "admired" him. Always backwards....so conservative, going in the wrong direction.
No, Dana, people get upset when someone that is supposed to be a journalist that demands integrity uses hyperbole and spin within a format that is not intended for humor.
@RicPhlare Well I personally didnt take Olbermann seriously. From sports commentator to a comedian/political commentatory isn't someone that is demanding to be respected. If I ever hear Keith complaining that he isn't considered a real news program, it will be white noise just as it is in the reverse case now for Dana.
I'm so sick of these fucking retards acting like they're playing with monopoly money and not REAL MONEY. We need term limits in congress in the worst way, these fools have been there so long they've lost touch with reality. I don't go break my back for 60 hours a week and piss off 40% of my check to uncle sam, only to watch him blow it like a drunken sailor at a strip club. STOP SENDING AID TO COUNTRIES THAT SUPPORT TERRORISM. STOP THE FLOW OF ILLEGALS INTO OUR COUNTRY. STOP SPENDING NOW UFREAKS
OMG Internets... Internets!!! It's not funny any more, Bill! Stop saying "Internets" as a joke before people start thinking you're actually not joking when you say it!
@WhiskyNorth If you earn under $30k, 0%; over $30k it starts at 10% working up to 35% for incomes over $250k. So let's say one makes $1m/yr: the first $30k is exempt, the income from $30-250k is taxed at the applicable rates, and everything above $250k is taxed at 35%. The average realized tax rate for individuals is just over 20%; for corporations it is 14%; state taxes are raised in lieu of federal taxes, ie if NYC charges 15% state tax, that payment can be deducted from your federal bill.
@Relbl Interesting, thanks for the answer. Is the highest tax rate 35 %? if the comulative tax rates of state and federal government goes over 35 % is it then deductable down to 35 %? Do you know what the fuel tax is, for gasoline?
@WhiskyNorth Yes, the max tax rate is 35% and state get the taxes they levy via transfers from the feds - the two tax rates ARE NOT cumulative despite what some news organizations will tell you. City taxes are not exempt though (if you have the misfortune). Depending on where you live there can be up to 6 different taxes on gasoline and I think the highest amount per gallon is somewhere north of $2/G in LA, or about half the price.
Oh I am so fucking sick of 'exceptionalism'. It seems like 'exceptionalism' is the belief that you're special or the best at something, *even when facts dictate that you are not*.
Conservatives have to realize that honesty is not always a virtue.
Just because someone is honest, it by no means guarantee the validity of their statements. Speaking honestly and speaking the truth are not the same thing.
Honest but wrong is not virtuous, it is called ignorance.
You want to engage in Democrat versus Republican bullshit. I don't give a shit about that. They all use the same economics. Where did you go to school?
@RicPhlare He also handed Bush a surplus. His point was that we wouldn't have as much debt if the tax cuts took place. Of course thats only part of the problem...but it is a PART. And I am sick of "tea party" people acting as if the government is not allowed to tax...it is in the constitution that government is allowed to impose taxes, fee's ect. If one of the uses for the tax is to pay off the debt then so be it.
@jwace - The reason there was a surplus was due to the stock market bubble of the late 90's. It burst and with it went the surplus. The two things are connected. Clinton was lucky and just happened to be in office when the boom happened and leaving when it burst. He had little to do with it. Bush happened to be in office when 9/11 happened. His was unlucky. I don't like Bush or Clinton's economics btw.
@TheSnoopy1750 - Clinton didn't create jobs. The economy did. He just happened to be president. After the recession of the early 90's, the normal up phase of the business cycle was next. It's scope was exaggerated by the loose money policy at the Fed. Clinton, Bush and Obama are all doing the same basic thing to different degrees- its called Keynesian economics - money printing. It will be a disaster.
@RicPhlare "Clinton didn't create jobs. The economy did. He just happened to be president. "
LOL
So now the President's economic polices have nothing to do with the economy? Of course every Republican credits Reagan for his decent economy, but I guess Democratic Presidents can't take credit for the economy under their watch?
LOL
Are you really that delusional? I am guessing yes.
FACT: Obama's stimulus (hated by republicans) was the primary driver for the subsequent GDP and job growth.
@TheSnoopy1750 - Your stuck in partisan politics and petty insults. You don't seem to understand the connection between the stock bubble bursting and the surplus evaporating. Are you able to put aside your hero worship and think something through?
@RicPhlare "Are you missing the point about the bursting bubble and the end of the budget surplus?"
The real problem is Bush's policies caused massive deficits. Unfunded tax cuts, an unfunded prescription plan, 2 wars - the $1+ Trillion Iraq war was 100% unnecessary, encouraging all citizens to buy houses which resulted in massive wealth loss, lax regulation of banks which caused Bush to spend $700Billion to bail out the banks with taxpayer cash.
@TheSnoopy1750 - You do not even understand what I am talking about. You do not understand basic economics. All you understand is that you love Obama and Clinton and hate Bush. They all do the same thing economically. Do you want to understand anything? Are you able to reason? Why don't you answer the question?
@RicPhlare Of course there is an impact given the "wealth effect" where people spend more based on net worth. Furthermore, the tax revenues from capital gains are higher. But the information revolution also increased productivity which Clinton encouraged.
@TheSnoopy1750 But my point is that Bush's policies killed the economy and made the deficit worse.
That is a fact.
I also pointed out how Obama's policies have revived the economy. Warren Buffett and Mark Zandi and virtually every Nobel economist says the stimulus worked.
@TheSnoopy1750 - Clinton, Bush and Obama have the same policies. Forget all the stuff. Can we just go with where I was going? Can we just go one post at a time?
@RicPhlare In addition, Obama wants to spend on education so the economy is more productive and we remain a leader in value-added products and services.
Republicans? They want to cut education and R&D. Genius!!!
The gov't needs some power to tax. The problem is their spending power, which needs to be curtailed. They won't pay a cent off the debt either. All new taxes will bring is new spending.
@RicPhlare yes, spending that wont require further loans, or such big loans, its just this easy, imagine a household, man and his wife make 200k a year, with their kid´s college, etc. they end up spending 230k, so each year since they´r kid joined college they have refinanced their home to borrow the extra 30k, if their revenue increased 30k, they might not solve their debt, but they sure as hell wont keep driving it up to insain and unaffordable monthly payments further down the line.
@RicPhlare also your assuming that they wont pay the debt, how do you know, the wont take part of that extra revenue from higher taxes, to generate a debt payment program, start by paying of the interest, so you can then start decreasing the principal.
@RicPhlare you are not getting my point, Im talking about the hipotetical scenario where taxes are increased, republicans have spread this falacy that the tax revenues will just go to more spending its simple: higher revenues+less spending=balanced acount. That´s what Obama wants, USA can not keep spending 1.5 times its revenue and again the solution is not only cutting spending, they also need to increase revenue from the so called "job creators" (jobs in Asia)
@eder333@eder333 - Keep dreaming. When have spending cuts ever happened? Never. Reagan made that deal in the '80's and the Democrats in congress never cut a thing. The lying vote whores (Dems and Rinos both) will never make meaningful cuts. The last person I'd believe on spending cuts would be Obama.
@RicPhlare I dont need to dream, its on the table, Obama´s package includes a 2.2 trillion decrease in spending and 500 billion tax hike, that´s the offer that´s on the table, please tell me how the republicans are not being irrational.
@eder333 - It's called lying. Obama does that. The proposed cuts will be some years away for somebody else to make. It's called kicking the can down the road. By the time Obama's cuts are set to kick in, America will be insolvent. Google 'Greece'.
@jwace spot on, In times of world war 2 there was a war tax, people understood that sacrifices must be made to support the country and its troops, now it seems not American corporation is willing to sacrifice a dime. Republicans talk and talk about patriotism and values but they´r unwilling to ask their billionaire buddies for a marginal percent more from their ridiculously huge profits. IMO its antiamerican not to pay more.
@Cheeba118 Some of her statements were logical...but they were hardly reasoning....earlier on that show they talked about taking away "big oil" tax breaks and she flipped out saying there should be no tax increases period. That is not being reasonable....its also not really being logical either with this economy.
@RicPhlare Again, you show selective memory - the great depression happened in the 1930's under "free market economics" which encouraged leveraged speculation.
Lots of regulation was put in during the 1930s (SEC, Glass Steagal etc.).
For over 50 years, there were no real financial disasters. Then there was deregulation starting in the 1990s - then we had lots of blowups.
Coincidence? Gee, I wonder.
If you don't understand financial history, keep quiet. You're an intellectual lightweight.
@RicPhlare the problem with free markets is that its based on a very very very utopic premise, that markets adequately and fairly regulate themselves, which turned out to be completely untrue, save very few peculiar markets, all markets tend to monopolies, duopolies and oligopolies if not properly regulated. Plus do you really believe markets run free under republicans? that they dont use subsidies and tax breaks and the likes to benefit their buddies, thus the market not being free nor fair
Dana Loesh doesn't have the intellect to complete college (dropout) so she is like many of the other tea party pundits who can't even finish college - Glenn Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity etc. In TP land, Palin is a friggin superstar as she completed college in 6 years.
Quite a brain trust the tea party is. What a joke - the dumb leading the dumb.
The TP thinks they don't need no stinkin' education. After all, they know global warming is a hoax, even though dummy NASA PhDs think otherwise.
@TheSnoopy1750 And to think....they are the ones who want a literacy test at the pols. I almost want to say go for it as it will beat them at their own game...most of them will fail.
@jwace - A large number of Obama's support is in the inner cities. The legacy of public school failure is deepest there. I live near Detroit and bet few products of that system could pass a 6th grade literacy test. Some of you higher on the food chain would have difficulty with spelling at the "pols" (spelled polls when I went to school)
@TheSnoopy1750 - 'Dumb' people who didn't finish college - Bill Gates, Paul Allen (Microsoft), Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak (Apple), Micheal Dell (Dell), Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook), Larry Ellison (Oracle), Richard Branson (Virgin), Mary Kay Ash (Cosmetics), Coco Chanel (perfume), Barry Diller (Fox), Richard Schulze (Best Buy), Ray Kroc (McDonald's), Dave Thomas (Wendys), Milton Hershey, Henry Ford, Walt DIsney, Thomas Edison, Frank Lloyd Wright (architect), Abe Lincoln, Benjamin Franklin...
@MayoMcCheese Wow, you picked the most successful non-graduates from over two centuries to prove what? So Dana is like any of these people? Your argument has zero relevance.
Dana couldn't hack college - Gates and Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard to start billion+ dollar companies while Dana didn't have the smarts to graduate from a 3rd rate college. BIG DIFFERENCE.
Most of the others started wildly successful businesses while Dana went into radio as a right wing hack.
@TheSnoopy1750 - Dana has been successful at something that people like Janeane Garafalo, Al Franken and a number of liberal idiots have failed at. You are the one who put emphasis on college graduation as measurement of intellect or ability to think. It's not. Often it's just a measurement of one's ability to regurgitate useless garbage to self-professed experts. O
I look forward to a time when people stop taking college dropouts, like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and yes, Dana Loesch seriously on political and economic issues
@kodiakfred140 College degrees are the most overrated thing in this country.. A person doesn't need a degree to form an opinion on a certain subject. I'm a very successful business person and I have one semester of college under my belt and let me tell you something, that one semester was the biggest waste of time and money I have ever spent. I think it's funny how you only listen to people with college degrees when there are thousands of intelligent people out there without a degree.. Moron.
@prokhan17 You obviously misunderstood me. I am saying that people like that have no opinion worth listening to about important social and political matters- mainly because they have no more expertise than any other asshole walking around. My problem isn't with them per se, it's with the fucking idiots who listen to them and actually take them seriously. In reality, you could probably get a more coherent opinion from a drunk in a bar. But I guess that makes me a moron, right?
Fuuuuuuuuuck Dana has a sexy mouth.
Vansit84 2 days ago
In 5:36 he's spot on when he says, about "what should we cut?" That is so American idiot way. To when things ain't good, and getting down and changing your life, changing your ways, and changing who you are, it's a hell'va allot easier to blame someone else.
EdBoonSucks 5 days ago
lol the black guy didn't even say a word the whole time.
ThroatyHerois 6 days ago
Damnit wish I could watch the shows online....then the overtimes...
Usernamesarebunk420 1 week ago
The former republican Rep Tom Daivs has the amnesia typical of his party lately. When W Bush took over we had a projected surplus and in less than a year he squandered it putting us back in debt.
drownoble 2 weeks ago
I don't understand what the preoccupation is with money in America, I don't even use half my money and I make not even a quarter of what these people make. What are these people so interested in that's so expensive?
12Ominous 2 weeks ago
Dana Loesch is hard to listen to. She's so damn hot.
MrRobo001red 2 weeks ago
Keep your government hands off my medicare!
=p
Zentz29 2 weeks ago 2
Paul Begala is awsome! Dropping bombs of knowledge!!!:D
Kimmis1990 1 month ago
NHS!!!! WOOOP
wadeanddave 1 month ago
Swedish Welfare! Woho!
VesuvioX4 1 month ago
Dana Loesch is a major-league hottie.
Doug31415 1 month ago 2
@Doug31415
I agree, but she's also annoying as fuck. Her voice is like a cheese grater to the ears.
TheSonorama21 1 month ago
@TheSonorama21 aside that this is a girls or a whiney gay bitch's comment oppinion lol which you're entitled too...
SHE's HOT & I'D FUCK HER!
freedomfun1 1 month ago
@freedomfun1 Have your mouth sores cleared up yet. USA..USA..USA
CATSASS1117 1 month ago
I love that BIll T Jones is being the consummate artist in this video. Just sitting back and observing the human interaction and making those connections in his head that help create his work.
TheDrowsyMadcap 1 month ago
the girl is super annoying
ag66636 2 months ago
That girl is an idiot. Each time she can't defend her position, she claims it was a joke, etc. She can't hold her own in a debate on any topic with Bill Maher.
hstg98 2 months ago in playlist B. Maher Clips
You always hear "It's not their money" as if the country could function on a 0% tax rate and everything over 0% is theft. Well, it can't! Everything would implode! So that argument is meaningless! If you want to argue for lower taxes, talk about results, not just 'they don't deserve it.' As if Obama is just taking all the money and giving it to himself. Greedily hoarding all those negative trillions.
NonsenseFabricator 3 months ago 5
god why do shows keep putting dumb eye-candy on camera?! they are so stupid with annoying voices. so tiresome seeing them spout canned crap without much substance. was amusing the 1st 3x.
Stinky95030 3 months ago
The more I watch Dana, the less I like her. Good greif she makes no logical sense.
adknerr 3 months ago 2
we dont get to judge the lives of company employees? so, what? being an employee of a company makes you better than a regular person?
somebody's priorities are off..
toraktorak 3 months ago
i would love to ''hate fuck'' that conservative ''chick''....and while im banging her i would repeatedly say ''take that socialize medicine bitch!''
press the thumbs up icon if you too want to ''hatefuck'' that chick!:)
WANTStoFEELupPALIN 4 months ago
you know what sucks is that she would be soooo much more attractive if she were a rational thinking, knowledgeable liberal
pinkycheeks 4 months ago 2
The adoration that Charlie Sheen gets at this point is typical of the American psyche. Pay so much attention to a waste of human space and completely ignore the fact that it's the excesses, drugs, and mental breakdown that should be the issue. But he's famous, and can do no wrong. I feel sorry for the guy that he thinks people actually love him, when secretly they are just pointing and laughing at him.
sethalos 5 months ago
@sethalos
Why are do Americans feel as though because they like a job someone does, the American get to judge a person in their personal life.
YOU LIKE THE JOB HE DOES ON HIS SHOW, LIKE WHEN THE PIZZA GUY GETS THERE ON TIME WITH THE RIGHT PIZZA.IF HE DOES HIS JOB GOOD (EITHER MAKING ME LAUGH OR BRINGING MY PIZZA)THEN IT's ALL GOOD. IF THE MESS UP?? All GOOD. EITHER WAY WE DON"T GET TO JUDGE THE PERSONAL LIVES OF COMPANY EMPLOYEES.
Ryousuke91t 4 months ago
If you can successfully defend a drug-addled, loudmouthed moron like Charlie Sheen (which this chick did not do)... wow, you're good.
He is such a fucking waste of space and the amount of praise he received by guys my age for "being awesome and telling it how it is" is such a testament to how low society will stoop when it comes to so-called "role models".
ciaobellakate 5 months ago
Good God, that woman is a blinkered idiot.
KellyGreen5555 5 months ago
what IS it with tea party/right wing american politicians? Totally disagree with them but they are smoking hot!! Remember Famke Janson? (chick from 007 flick Goldeneye?). That's the American version with the beauty but zero brains!!
musicalglenn 5 months ago
@musicalglenn whoa whoa whoa.....Famke Janson is right winger??? never watching x-men again....
MsDDiddy 5 months ago
@musicalglenn Hey great comparison man! Good eye.After u mentioned Famke Jansen I was like hell yeah! She so resembles her.But then u know what they say abt women and brains right? Inversely proportional.Beautiful women,mostly dumb,bimbos.Brilliant women,not so good looking.
scammamish 5 months ago
@musicalglenn
Nah, she doesn't look anything like Famke. How about a good mixture of Heather Graham and Jennifer Connelly?
lavinder11 1 month ago
You could not hit kids but You could cut them for religion?
SIC
Overkillerr 6 months ago
conservative women are so pathetic. can you say stockholm syndrome
dcincdsr301 6 months ago 2
Jeez look at these Republicans trying to convince the Tea Party about what they really want. No, the old Tea Party memebers certainly do NOT want their entitlment programs cut, what person over 65 would?
adknerr 6 months ago
If you are collecting Social Security, unemployment bens, Medicare/Caid or Welfare of any kind the YOU ARE A SOCIALIST. Maher is right--if you hate "Socialism" then STOP COLLECTING NOW and GIVE IT ALL BACK!
thedrake1954 6 months ago 24
@thedrake1954
Okay, as soon as its no longer taken out of our wages.
nightflight83 1 month ago
We should not measure people by their money. What a sad place where those carers that look after people with disabilities and help others in poverty receive no limelight and have no value on our society. But a drunk on a sitcom is admired. Just sad thats all.
factvfiction 6 months ago 40
@factvfiction it's because no one cares. A drunk on a sitcom is funny, he flys us away from our ordinary middle class. Only people who have connections with disabled or poor people genuinely care about them. Truth, there's money where people want to spend it.
ALPHAHXCORE 5 months ago
Al Franken is a comedian? Aren't comedians supposed to be funny? Being elected does not qualify him as a success, just a political leech. Franken graduated with a poli-sci degree. The study of political science is nothing more than the recitation of lefty bullshit and drug abuse. All that qualifies him for is being a liberal.
MayoMcCheese 6 months ago
bill maher is a d-bag....... dana loecsh is so B A!! she actually knows what she is talking about
awren0102 6 months ago
@awren0102 is dana loesch knowing whats shes talking about with taxation or charlie sheen? because i dont get either.
AWesome61696 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
Comment removed
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
Tea Bagger morons.. fuck.. all they bitch about is taxes, its called REVENUE, asshats.
aegisgfx 7 months ago
@aegisgfx - Tea Baggee idiots...fuck...all they bitch about is revenue, it's called CONFISCATION, asshole.
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare
you pay the lowest taxes in the world, and still you complain. How are you going to continue to have a military 2 times the size of the rest of the world if you have no revenue.. borrow it from china? Good luck with that plan.. genius.
aegisgfx 7 months ago
@aegisgfx - Being from the former Soviet Union, if you had any brains you would know that socialism doesn't work - as eastern europe and Russia suffers through a 20+ year hangover from 70 years of state socialism. Dunce.
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare Who in the United States is supporting socialism? It seems, from what I know, Russia is moving in the right direction. Putin and Medvedev make a good team. The USA is moving in the wrong direction, and that direction isn't even socialism. It's just too much military spending, too much reliance on foreign goods, and too much debt.
AWesome61696 6 months ago
@AWesome61696 - Anybody supporting President Marx is supporting socialism. Entitlement spending is about 60% of federal spending and will only increase as boomers age. The US borrows about 40 cents of every dollar it spends. In short, revenue only covers entitlements and that will end soon. Do the math - all other spending is deficit and therefore, new debt. You can cut miltary spending to zero and it won't matter.
RicPhlare 6 months ago
con't - The so-called spending cuts aren't cuts - they are just reductions in planned increases. If the US did nothing but freeze spending at current levels - using government math it would be a $9.5 Trillion cut out to 2020 - 4 X the size of the phony cuts in the debt deal. Government spending has to be cut - reforms in entitlement spending is needed - starting with repealing ObamaCare.
RicPhlare 6 months ago
@RicPhlare Okay. So we have some upcoming fiscal problems. Cutting military spending will help ALOT buddy. Raising taxes on the rich will help as well. And reforming entitlement programs, cutting the buracracy, will also help. And where do you draw the conclusion that the current president should be labeled "President Marx." That's just ignorant.
AWesome61696 6 months ago
@AWesome61696 - Fiscal problems? Like saying Rosie O'Donnell needs to lose 5 pounds.. You've said nothing but the standard lefty rhetoric that Obama's teleprompter says. Soaking the rich will simply encourage them to leave the US or move their assets offshore, taking investment and jobs. Why don't you people understand that? The 'progressive' tax system is half the problem - it punishes incentive and encourages cheating.
RicPhlare 6 months ago
con't 1- - The top 10% of taxpayers pay about 50% of the total. The top 25% pay about 85%. The top 50% pay 97% of the total. How much is enough? Soaking the rich does not work. Almost 50% of Americans pay nothing. The problem is runaway spending. Don't expect Obama to do anything about entitlements other than increase them - Obamacare. As far as the military goes - with the US winding down Iraq, Obama unilaterally & illegally puts the US into another war in Libya.
RicPhlare 6 months ago
@RicPhlare Do you know why the top 10% of taxpayers pay so much? In 2004, the wealthiest 25% of US households owned 87% ($43.6 trillion) of the country’s wealth, while the bottom quartile held no net wealth at all. Plus the both 50% don't pay income tax. They do pay payroll tax which goes to SS and medicare.Gas and other federal excise taxes. There also state and local taxes. (the rich pay so much in income tax because they earn the most and by a very large percentage. )(cont1)
Theimmortalwhitewolf 6 months ago
@RicPhlare (cont1)300,000 Americans collectively enjoyed almost as much income as the bottom 150 million Americans. The top 1 percent received 21.8 percent of all reported income in 2005, up significantly from 19.8 percent the year before and more than double their share of income in 1980. The peak was in 1928, when the top 1 percent reported 23.9 percent of all income.(however i do again entitlements will have to be reviewed and modified from their current forms. Just like military spending)
Theimmortalwhitewolf 6 months ago
@RicPhlare
democratic socialism works just fine in most countries, but fascist socialism is not the same thing. Thats more like what you guys had.
aegisgfx 6 months ago
@aegisgfx - The only real difference between socialism and communism is that socialism provides an illusion of democracy. In socialism, people have a choice between any number of left-wing socialist parties who will all do the same thing.
RicPhlare 6 months ago
Dana Loesch is awesome
ThePelicans44 7 months ago
fuck money
mcmcerson 7 months ago
Gotta cut 'foreign aid' to save the deficit haha I hear that so much.
jbisasky 7 months ago
Listen to the interview with Bachmann. There was no humor in her tone at all. If that was conservative humor then it's true, conservatives are not funny.
kingsdun 7 months ago in playlist Bill Maher
Is dana really that stupid and arrogant or does she work at it.
HugoBossUnzipped 7 months ago
so conservatives, let me see if i understand this. gay people and jews and muslims are pawns of satan and evil but charlie sheen is ok? WTF!?
MsDDiddy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MsDDiddy To the christian right, Jews are pawns of satan except when they are killing muslims in middle east.
ricardofuego 7 months ago
This is a great example of bullshit Ayn Rand worship of "exceptional" people. Yes, we have to support the elite, because they are BETTER than us! Elite people like... Charlie Sheen... and... Bernie Madoff and... Paul Allen... wait... those "exceptionals" are total assholes! Supporting the elite is supporting greed. If you don't take the pie from Scrooge, he'll eat the whole thing! THAT'S why we regulate! Because we CANNOT trust capitalist to be honest.
punkwasher 7 months ago
She's lucky she's hot...
SteamEqualsFAIL 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SteamEqualsFAIL
"She's lucky she's hot..."
Are you kidding? Its the only reason she's on this show.
DrChristianShepard 7 months ago
whats with all the clapping
FootbalFutbolS0ccer 7 months ago
Comment removed
FootbalFutbolS0ccer 7 months ago
The crazy right-wing support of Charlie Sheen shows YET AGAIN how they are ALWAYS wrong! He is a sad, soon-to-declare-bancruptcy, has-been, but just months ago, jagweed frat boys & girls "admired" him. Always backwards....so conservative, going in the wrong direction.
katemccloudy 7 months ago
Loesch is so phony...."Don't call me a Republican." Then she immediately leans over and says, "No offense!" to the Republican next to her.
202pdiddy 7 months ago
What is being done with the tax money?
Copper4head 7 months ago
@Copper4head subsidizing oil companies, that can make 14 billion dollars per quarter
eder333 7 months ago
No, Dana, people get upset when someone that is supposed to be a journalist that demands integrity uses hyperbole and spin within a format that is not intended for humor.
adknerr 8 months ago
@adknerr - You mean like Olbermann?
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare Well I personally didnt take Olbermann seriously. From sports commentator to a comedian/political commentatory isn't someone that is demanding to be respected. If I ever hear Keith complaining that he isn't considered a real news program, it will be white noise just as it is in the reverse case now for Dana.
adknerr 7 months ago
@adknerr - Except Dana makes sense.
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare Certainly not always...
adknerr 7 months ago
Didnt Bill say that him and Charlie where friends during and interview he did with Brad Pitt?
Shnerkenferter 8 months ago
I'm so sick of these fucking retards acting like they're playing with monopoly money and not REAL MONEY. We need term limits in congress in the worst way, these fools have been there so long they've lost touch with reality. I don't go break my back for 60 hours a week and piss off 40% of my check to uncle sam, only to watch him blow it like a drunken sailor at a strip club. STOP SENDING AID TO COUNTRIES THAT SUPPORT TERRORISM. STOP THE FLOW OF ILLEGALS INTO OUR COUNTRY. STOP SPENDING NOW UFREAKS
JoeDaWg82 8 months ago
Maher seems to be a major dick.
Am i wrong?
shurednichso 8 months ago
@shurednichso he's not politically correct and he's got an opinion. Boo hoo.
TheCdnBacon 8 months ago
@TheCdnBacon
What has being a dick to do with being political correct,dickhead?
You can say what you want and not be an asshole. Get my point.
shurednichso 7 months ago
@shurednichso That you're a hypocrite? Yup.
TheCdnBacon 7 months ago
@shurednichso Yes.
GrigoriSom 7 months ago
Beautiful, stupid chick...yeah I've seen enough of these
LocoGroove 8 months ago
OMG Internets... Internets!!! It's not funny any more, Bill! Stop saying "Internets" as a joke before people start thinking you're actually not joking when you say it!
eggiex1 8 months ago
Awww, she is so cute.
MJFAN666 8 months ago
Dana Loesch is a beautiful idiot.
mrbrianmccarthy 8 months ago
was that black guy a audience member or crew member who got to sit and watch up close LOL
LCXXXSR 8 months ago
Why doesn't Maher have Chris Hedges on Realtime?
Tsnore 8 months ago
Why does Bill always put on Crazy right-wing hot chicks? it makes them much more difficult to masturbate to.
lynottlives 8 months ago
@lynottlives LMFAO!!!!!! that was brilliant
lordrazr 8 months ago
@lynottlives Are you kidding? It makes them 10 times hotter!
homeworld33 6 months ago
@homeworld33 hahaha, yeah i guess it does in a weird way. :L
lynottlives 6 months ago
Ransom? You mean like the republicans threatening to shut down government if their rich buddies didn't get tax cuts AGAIN?
kr4yzi32k 8 months ago
What is the average income tax in USA?
WhiskyNorth 8 months ago
@WhiskyNorth If you earn under $30k, 0%; over $30k it starts at 10% working up to 35% for incomes over $250k. So let's say one makes $1m/yr: the first $30k is exempt, the income from $30-250k is taxed at the applicable rates, and everything above $250k is taxed at 35%. The average realized tax rate for individuals is just over 20%; for corporations it is 14%; state taxes are raised in lieu of federal taxes, ie if NYC charges 15% state tax, that payment can be deducted from your federal bill.
Relbl 8 months ago
@Relbl Interesting, thanks for the answer. Is the highest tax rate 35 %? if the comulative tax rates of state and federal government goes over 35 % is it then deductable down to 35 %? Do you know what the fuel tax is, for gasoline?
WhiskyNorth 8 months ago
@WhiskyNorth Yes, the max tax rate is 35% and state get the taxes they levy via transfers from the feds - the two tax rates ARE NOT cumulative despite what some news organizations will tell you. City taxes are not exempt though (if you have the misfortune). Depending on where you live there can be up to 6 different taxes on gasoline and I think the highest amount per gallon is somewhere north of $2/G in LA, or about half the price.
Relbl 8 months ago
@WhiskyNorth the average income tax is 25%. Under Clinton it was 28%.
Kimmis1990 3 months ago
Our situation is very different from Portugal and Greece...
vatoencabronado 8 months ago
Not commenting on this new -ism going around; but I gotta say Maher don't excactly raise the bar here...
gram84 8 months ago
dipstick but nice tits
bmfdv 9 months ago
"Embraces exceptionalism".
Oh I am so fucking sick of 'exceptionalism'. It seems like 'exceptionalism' is the belief that you're special or the best at something, *even when facts dictate that you are not*.
TheConciseStatement 9 months ago
You go Bill.
ruvolk24 9 months ago
In 2 years im moving to Canada
sue01234567890 9 months ago
dana needs to shut up nd just keep her legs behind her head
ThaGoldenStandard 9 months ago
Conservatives have to realize that honesty is not always a virtue.
Just because someone is honest, it by no means guarantee the validity of their statements. Speaking honestly and speaking the truth are not the same thing.
Honest but wrong is not virtuous, it is called ignorance.
Neosaigo 9 months ago
You want to engage in Democrat versus Republican bullshit. I don't give a shit about that. They all use the same economics. Where did you go to school?
RicPhlare 9 months ago
Begala is intellectually dishonest. Clinton handed Bush the bursting tech bubble.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare He also handed Bush a surplus. His point was that we wouldn't have as much debt if the tax cuts took place. Of course thats only part of the problem...but it is a PART. And I am sick of "tea party" people acting as if the government is not allowed to tax...it is in the constitution that government is allowed to impose taxes, fee's ect. If one of the uses for the tax is to pay off the debt then so be it.
jwace 9 months ago
@jwace - The reason there was a surplus was due to the stock market bubble of the late 90's. It burst and with it went the surplus. The two things are connected. Clinton was lucky and just happened to be in office when the boom happened and leaving when it burst. He had little to do with it. Bush happened to be in office when 9/11 happened. His was unlucky. I don't like Bush or Clinton's economics btw.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare So the 21 million jobs that Clinton created were all at dot coms? LOL
The fact is Bush destroyed the economy.
Obama passed the stimulus and after the several months it took to get the money into the economy, there was job growth.
FACT is that Obama brought the economy. Warren Buffett and McCain economic advisor Zandi said the stimulus was the key.
Bush unlucky with 9/11? He was previously given a report the said "OBL determined to attack inside the U.S." but he did nothing.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Clinton didn't create jobs. The economy did. He just happened to be president. After the recession of the early 90's, the normal up phase of the business cycle was next. It's scope was exaggerated by the loose money policy at the Fed. Clinton, Bush and Obama are all doing the same basic thing to different degrees- its called Keynesian economics - money printing. It will be a disaster.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare "Clinton didn't create jobs. The economy did. He just happened to be president. "
LOL
So now the President's economic polices have nothing to do with the economy? Of course every Republican credits Reagan for his decent economy, but I guess Democratic Presidents can't take credit for the economy under their watch?
LOL
Are you really that delusional? I am guessing yes.
FACT: Obama's stimulus (hated by republicans) was the primary driver for the subsequent GDP and job growth.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Your stuck in partisan politics and petty insults. You don't seem to understand the connection between the stock bubble bursting and the surplus evaporating. Are you able to put aside your hero worship and think something through?
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Are you missing the point about the bursting bubble and the end of the budget surplus? You don't seem to get what I am saying.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare "Are you missing the point about the bursting bubble and the end of the budget surplus?"
The real problem is Bush's policies caused massive deficits. Unfunded tax cuts, an unfunded prescription plan, 2 wars - the $1+ Trillion Iraq war was 100% unnecessary, encouraging all citizens to buy houses which resulted in massive wealth loss, lax regulation of banks which caused Bush to spend $700Billion to bail out the banks with taxpayer cash.
Do you now understand how wrong you are? lol
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - You do not even understand what I am talking about. You do not understand basic economics. All you understand is that you love Obama and Clinton and hate Bush. They all do the same thing economically. Do you want to understand anything? Are you able to reason? Why don't you answer the question?
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare I have a masters in finance/economics and worked in i-banking.
And you?
You are an intellectual lightweight. I stated facts and you can't debate them.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Explain the connection between the bursting stock bubble and the evaporation of the budget surplus.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare Of course there is an impact given the "wealth effect" where people spend more based on net worth. Furthermore, the tax revenues from capital gains are higher. But the information revolution also increased productivity which Clinton encouraged.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 But my point is that Bush's policies killed the economy and made the deficit worse.
That is a fact.
I also pointed out how Obama's policies have revived the economy. Warren Buffett and Mark Zandi and virtually every Nobel economist says the stimulus worked.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Clinton, Bush and Obama have the same policies. Forget all the stuff. Can we just go with where I was going? Can we just go one post at a time?
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare Did you read anything I wrote? Their policies were very different.
Bush drove the economy into the ground and ballooned the deficit with his tax cuts, prescription plans, the wars etc.
Again, I know more than you ever will about finance and economics. You don't even know the basic differences in economic policy.
You also never debated my facts.
I am done wasting my time with someone not versed in economics.
Have a nice day.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@RicPhlare In addition, Obama wants to spend on education so the economy is more productive and we remain a leader in value-added products and services.
Republicans? They want to cut education and R&D. Genius!!!
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
The gov't needs some power to tax. The problem is their spending power, which needs to be curtailed. They won't pay a cent off the debt either. All new taxes will bring is new spending.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare yes, spending that wont require further loans, or such big loans, its just this easy, imagine a household, man and his wife make 200k a year, with their kid´s college, etc. they end up spending 230k, so each year since they´r kid joined college they have refinanced their home to borrow the extra 30k, if their revenue increased 30k, they might not solve their debt, but they sure as hell wont keep driving it up to insain and unaffordable monthly payments further down the line.
eder333 7 months ago
@RicPhlare also your assuming that they wont pay the debt, how do you know, the wont take part of that extra revenue from higher taxes, to generate a debt payment program, start by paying of the interest, so you can then start decreasing the principal.
eder333 7 months ago
@eder333 - A huge deficit says they won't pay off debt. You can't pay down debt running a deficit. How do you think the debt got over $14 trillion?
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare you are not getting my point, Im talking about the hipotetical scenario where taxes are increased, republicans have spread this falacy that the tax revenues will just go to more spending its simple: higher revenues+less spending=balanced acount. That´s what Obama wants, USA can not keep spending 1.5 times its revenue and again the solution is not only cutting spending, they also need to increase revenue from the so called "job creators" (jobs in Asia)
eder333 7 months ago
@eder333 @eder333 - Keep dreaming. When have spending cuts ever happened? Never. Reagan made that deal in the '80's and the Democrats in congress never cut a thing. The lying vote whores (Dems and Rinos both) will never make meaningful cuts. The last person I'd believe on spending cuts would be Obama.
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@RicPhlare I dont need to dream, its on the table, Obama´s package includes a 2.2 trillion decrease in spending and 500 billion tax hike, that´s the offer that´s on the table, please tell me how the republicans are not being irrational.
eder333 7 months ago
@eder333 - It's called lying. Obama does that. The proposed cuts will be some years away for somebody else to make. It's called kicking the can down the road. By the time Obama's cuts are set to kick in, America will be insolvent. Google 'Greece'.
RicPhlare 7 months ago
@eder333 LOL it's cuts from future spending. Not actual cuts. Typical Obama move and you either fell for it or are purposely being deceptive
dowder6 7 months ago
@jwace spot on, In times of world war 2 there was a war tax, people understood that sacrifices must be made to support the country and its troops, now it seems not American corporation is willing to sacrifice a dime. Republicans talk and talk about patriotism and values but they´r unwilling to ask their billionaire buddies for a marginal percent more from their ridiculously huge profits. IMO its antiamerican not to pay more.
eder333 7 months ago
Hmm. I like her!
MykeMetyll 9 months ago
@MykeMetyll Her body or her attitude?
jwace 9 months ago
@jwace
A little of both.
MykeMetyll 9 months ago
this lady is such a fake...not a whole lota brain up in that skull.
linoleumcarving 9 months ago
she is sooo hot
phish1085 9 months ago
The things I'd eat out of her ass.....
Spartacus217 10 months ago
What a dopey bitch.
thedehness 10 months ago
It's true...this country has become overly sensitive
TheRedHedCEO2011 10 months ago
Dana is awsome. She schools liberals and uses logic and reasoning. they hate that.
Cheeba118 10 months ago
@Cheeba118 LOL that's one of the most hilarious things I've ever heard about a Conservative ! SHE is the one who (by far) gets schooled the most !
Claronium780 10 months ago 2
@Cheeba118 are we watching the same clip here?
MsDDiddy 10 months ago
@Cheeba118 Some of her statements were logical...but they were hardly reasoning....earlier on that show they talked about taking away "big oil" tax breaks and she flipped out saying there should be no tax increases period. That is not being reasonable....its also not really being logical either with this economy.
jwace 9 months ago
@jwace - It's very realistic. It's called free market economics and what the country was built on 1776-1913 inclusive.
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@RicPhlare Again, you show selective memory - the great depression happened in the 1930's under "free market economics" which encouraged leveraged speculation.
Lots of regulation was put in during the 1930s (SEC, Glass Steagal etc.).
For over 50 years, there were no real financial disasters. Then there was deregulation starting in the 1990s - then we had lots of blowups.
Coincidence? Gee, I wonder.
If you don't understand financial history, keep quiet. You're an intellectual lightweight.
TheSnoopy1750 9 months ago
@RicPhlare the problem with free markets is that its based on a very very very utopic premise, that markets adequately and fairly regulate themselves, which turned out to be completely untrue, save very few peculiar markets, all markets tend to monopolies, duopolies and oligopolies if not properly regulated. Plus do you really believe markets run free under republicans? that they dont use subsidies and tax breaks and the likes to benefit their buddies, thus the market not being free nor fair
eder333 7 months ago
Dana Loesh doesn't have the intellect to complete college (dropout) so she is like many of the other tea party pundits who can't even finish college - Glenn Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity etc. In TP land, Palin is a friggin superstar as she completed college in 6 years.
Quite a brain trust the tea party is. What a joke - the dumb leading the dumb.
The TP thinks they don't need no stinkin' education. After all, they know global warming is a hoax, even though dummy NASA PhDs think otherwise.
TheSnoopy1750 10 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 yeah you know you are a worthless group of buffoons when your most intellectual members are Dana Loesch and Sarah Palin lol
Claronium780 10 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 And to think....they are the ones who want a literacy test at the pols. I almost want to say go for it as it will beat them at their own game...most of them will fail.
jwace 9 months ago
@jwace - A large number of Obama's support is in the inner cities. The legacy of public school failure is deepest there. I live near Detroit and bet few products of that system could pass a 6th grade literacy test. Some of you higher on the food chain would have difficulty with spelling at the "pols" (spelled polls when I went to school)
RicPhlare 9 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - 'Dumb' people who didn't finish college - Bill Gates, Paul Allen (Microsoft), Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak (Apple), Micheal Dell (Dell), Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook), Larry Ellison (Oracle), Richard Branson (Virgin), Mary Kay Ash (Cosmetics), Coco Chanel (perfume), Barry Diller (Fox), Richard Schulze (Best Buy), Ray Kroc (McDonald's), Dave Thomas (Wendys), Milton Hershey, Henry Ford, Walt DIsney, Thomas Edison, Frank Lloyd Wright (architect), Abe Lincoln, Benjamin Franklin...
MayoMcCheese 6 months ago
@MayoMcCheese Wow, you picked the most successful non-graduates from over two centuries to prove what? So Dana is like any of these people? Your argument has zero relevance.
Dana couldn't hack college - Gates and Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard to start billion+ dollar companies while Dana didn't have the smarts to graduate from a 3rd rate college. BIG DIFFERENCE.
Most of the others started wildly successful businesses while Dana went into radio as a right wing hack.
TheSnoopy1750 6 months ago
@TheSnoopy1750 - Dana has been successful at something that people like Janeane Garafalo, Al Franken and a number of liberal idiots have failed at. You are the one who put emphasis on college graduation as measurement of intellect or ability to think. It's not. Often it's just a measurement of one's ability to regurgitate useless garbage to self-professed experts. O
MayoMcCheese 6 months ago
@MayoMcCheese Al Franken - Harvard grad, well-respected satirist/comedian, U.S. Senator.
Dana Loesche - college dropout, radio host/blogger who works for dirt bag Breitbart.
Yeah, Dana is much more successful than Al Franken. LOL
TheSnoopy1750 6 months ago
@MayoMcCheese
That may be true when you consider the major and GPA, but Dana isn't very articulate. She's shooting from the hip with her emotions.
lavinder11 1 month ago
Comment removed
plotfi1 10 months ago
Dana needs a little bit of special sauce on her face. Any takers?
jakeywe 10 months ago
Dana Loesch is a dipstick.
bmw318racer 10 months ago 31
I look forward to a time when people stop taking college dropouts, like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and yes, Dana Loesch seriously on political and economic issues
kodiakfred140 10 months ago
@kodiakfred140 College degrees are the most overrated thing in this country.. A person doesn't need a degree to form an opinion on a certain subject. I'm a very successful business person and I have one semester of college under my belt and let me tell you something, that one semester was the biggest waste of time and money I have ever spent. I think it's funny how you only listen to people with college degrees when there are thousands of intelligent people out there without a degree.. Moron.
prokhan17 10 months ago
@prokhan17 You obviously misunderstood me. I am saying that people like that have no opinion worth listening to about important social and political matters- mainly because they have no more expertise than any other asshole walking around. My problem isn't with them per se, it's with the fucking idiots who listen to them and actually take them seriously. In reality, you could probably get a more coherent opinion from a drunk in a bar. But I guess that makes me a moron, right?
kodiakfred140 10 months ago