Genesis Hoaxes (8): Let Us Make Man (Part II)

[benelijah12]

hmm if you look at verses 1 and 2 you would see that The Earth Must have been Destroyed. Because it was void and was in chaos. All we know God could of evolved men from creature before then killed off the last remnant of premen then created the man today. or god gave him a soul. which is to say God was experimenting before the 6000 year history mark. but there are many interpretation so this is some of mine

[tjrxk7]

ChurchBandit,your interpretations of the Bible are right on the money. It is a shame your studies are not well known. I appreciate you trying to show how the Bible does tell many truths but what organized religion and their minions have done was to wash the ancient texts so much that they are not comprehensible as you well know. The Clay Tablets of the ancient Sumerians are NOT so easy to 'change' and 'mistranslate'. (You just have to spend decades figuring them out as Sitchen did.)

[ripleereeves]

just because verse 26 says let us make man after verse 24 says about the animals does not mean he did not say let us make man before he said let the animals be made. for example God was calling the animals names before adam was made (supposedly). but adam was the one who named all the animals according to genesis. u get it?

[ChurchBandit]

If you're stuck on the face value of the English translation, not much can be done. The scriptures were originally written in ancient Hebrew.

Do you believe the original story? Or the one that came along 1000s of years later, in English?

[tjrxk7]

@ChurchBandit Moses also HAD NO CLUE he was dealing with 'Enlil',who was nothing more than a psychotic ET that wanted his chosen people to war on others that had their own 'gods'. This 'jealous/wrathful god' proclaimed himself as the 'Creator of the Universe'. Now that is big-time propaganda if I ever heard it! Who in their right mind would argue with something like that??? You're damn straight Abraham, Moses,then Joshua are gonna pay heed to his orders!

[yisraeldoctor]

@ripleereeves the creator tell the male to name the animals an see if any would be compatible to him why? because he wanted a helper for his children none were found this is when he cast a deep sleep up on his son and made a helper not a wife remember in gen 1;26 cleanly state that the man is male and female woman is also male and female so that they could also multiply after they own kind because they are a different race to man they were made for helpers for man wife

[ripleereeves]

@yisraeldoctor whats your point? explain please

[yisraeldoctor]

@ripleereeves I agree with you that the Creator supposedly name the animals before Adam but what else did he tell Adam after he name the animals?

[thenewend2012]

i always enjoy genesis together with the books of eccle & salms they are like poetic justice not to say the new testament shares some excellent pholosophys ..defenitebly allien knolledge.

[KRU78]

i agree with Zahar it is 'ehyah' 'asher ' ehyeh I will be what I will be(or become) you strayed off a good study with all this egyptian rationalization and it never related close enough to make such a stance

[stevehauk]

How do you come up with "RE-make" man in our image from aw-saw in the Hebrew?

[HAPeMILL]

I looks like the context of how the word is used.

[stevehauk]

This is heavy stuff why are you making a joke about it? Or maybe I'm misreading you.

[ChurchBandit]

Relax!

[stevehauk]

Hey with all the arrogant atheist out there criticizing things they know nothing or very little about (that haven't even proven their beliefs to themselves but just believing what they've heard I might add) I just think you shouldn't make light of your research.

[daWiiZarD]

steve

What are you talking about?

[stevehauk]

What do you mean, what am I talking about? Be more specific, I wrote several different things.

[ChurchBandit]

In MY experience ... Atheists know a lot more about biblical scriptures than religious folks.

[ChurchBandit]

OH - KAY!

[ZaharSakal1]

The name YAHWEH is not present in Shemot 3:14, which reads as follows; "And Elohim said to Mashah'mesu, EHYEH ASHER EHYEH: and he said, Thus shall you say to the children of Yi'sara'el, EHYEH has sent me to you."

[boardplaya]

Man was made in the image of God PERIOD. The Holy spirit guides us into all truth. You can search and research all ur life; none of it can add a second to your life Only the Lord can do such I am just suggesting that rather than spitting in God's face by telling him what he meant to say, or whatever ur trying to accomplish here go do something valuable like seeking a personal relationship with Christ who died for regular people like me and you. Pray and earnestly ask for the truth is my friend!

[boardplaya]

My friend you should not waste ur time thinking of what clever way you can get someone to side with you in your belief because it takes effor to believe he doesnt exist Rather you should prayerfully read the entire bible starting with the new testament and open heartedly try to understand for yourself what it is talking about rather than listening to other non believers approaches to support your cause. Don waste ur time fighting God try to learn about him in what is writen bout him that simple

[ChurchBandit]

Hi boardplaya

Why is something a "WASTE OF TIME" simply bcz "YOU DISAGREE?"

People who have never RESEARCHED ANYTHING IN THEIR LIVES ... always think they know more.

The CLEVER WAYS are in all the DOCUMENTED FACTS that YOU REFUSE TO LOOK UP! You think the FACE VALUE of ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS are GOD'S WORD. That would be STUPID! Since God never wrote anything in ENGLISH!

[boardplaya]

english translation not as accurate but it does not alter the bible in a way to mean something other than what is clearly stated its just a matter of emphasis and conjugation. I say it is a waste of time because it is. You take what someone else has researched and then you apply it to your belief and say that you have "look it up, or researched for yourself' God is a spirit and you are trying to outwit him you will never understand God unless you want to. The spirit of God dwells within all

[OutrLiimitz]

How could the Bible NOT BE ACCURATE & NOT ALTER ANYTHING at the same time?

If ANYTHING is not ACCURATE it will give THE WRONG MESSAGE! That's INCLUDING THE BIBLE.

[boardplaya]

Timothy tells u exactly why God gave us the bible. Mankind has forsaken its creator and with crime there is punishment. Jesus came to take on each and every humans death penalty for sinning. Today ppl say oh u cant prove God exist and such but Jesus said that this generation will have no sign for God to prove himself to us except the Ressurection of Christ if u dont blieve thats on you but he said if you dont recieve me neither will the father recieve you

[boardplaya]

God loves you ya know the only reason he gave us the bible was not to tear it down but see how he eagerly wanted to help mankind throughout our journey but there has always been resistance and u urself said it is futile he wont judge you your actions will it isnt too late so long as you have breath my friend God wants you because he loved you before you knew you our Lord Jesus Christ is faithful and just to forgive my friend just ask and he will do so.

God Bless

Jon

[ChurchBandit]

Hi boardplaya

Do you have any PROOF that GOD gave us THE BIBLE? And if God he did - How do YOU know why?

[boardplaya]

2 Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine,reproof,correction,in­struction in righteousness." You can also take into consideration the prophecies that come to pass an exaple would be Jeremiah 47:5 "Baldness is come upon Gaza; Ashkelon is cut off with the remnant of her valley..." You can witness this coming to pass as we speak Gaza will be destroyed for the most part. The bible has thousands of prophecies that have and will be fulfiled

[Davidweiser]

I heard that name IoA from somewhere else? I think it was the name of the Watcher from the Marvel Universe Comics of Stan Lee. Interesting.

[demoniclordwizard]

I did google IAO before posting the comment , but didnt really find much, which leads me to believe you heard of it somewhere and took it as fact. Stop misleading the people , you are doing satan's work and probably don't even realize it.

[OutrLiimitz]

demon

Just bcz you can't find something (after a brief & inaccurate search) doesn't mean its non-existent.

The suggestion was 2 Google: IAO & Yahweh - TOGETHER. "IAO" alone won't bring much of a result. You sort'v hv 2 point the Search Engine n/t right direction.

FYI: People who believe in "Satan" apparently heard it somewhere & took it as FACT. Becareful who you call MISLED.

[demoniclordwizard]

I wonder where you get this IAO from ? I've been looking at some Egyptian resources , specifically their Gods , and I dont see IAO listed anywhere , could you specify where you found this God ?

[OutrLiimitz]

IAO isn't exclusively Egyptian. IAO existed among many ancient cultures as the "Supreme Deity."

Try Googling (together): IAO, Yahweh.

[MidnitXpres]

Very impressive!

[greezyc]

You are right, resistance is futile. I really like the way you presented all this information!

[freetaught]

Truly interesting! 5 stars and a new subscriber for U!

[bubbledumm]

Agreed!

[ChurchBandit]

Hi Jerroleen

Where do you think the OT portion of the Latin Vulgate came from? The Hebrew texts! ♣

[Jerroleen]

The Hebrew text wasn't the primary text from which most of the translations have been made. They used the Latin Vulgate.

[MestaMynd]

To me, (in analogy) Religious People are like High School graduates =who don't continue their education (they only know what their religion tells them)= then ACT LIKE THEY KNOW EVERYTHING! That is, until they encounter someone with a MASTER'S DEGREE!

[OutrLiimitz]

MEZMERIZING!!!

[PrettiiWhiteFemale]

aren't they wonderfull? [gryn]

[SONofMADman]

It may have took a while but your vids make complete sense after I turned off the "instant reject faculty" for things that don't conform to what I've been taught over the years. Nice job!

[ChurchBandit]

Hi ex670

R u sure about that? Regardless, t/KJV set t/precedent. ♣

[DarkConfMan]

So Dark the Con of Man‡

[tubulaar]

very, very kool!

[VideoFoe]

I've watched videos1-8 and I feel SCHOLARLY for the very first time in my life! I've learned so much! More than all my years in Sunday School!

[everlg]

assuming what you say is real, then how come the bible says the same in every language, not just english. i mean it could be possible that they got the english translation wrong but what about every other language. how could everybody translate the bible wrong. or are you assuming that they translated wrong in purpose?

[ChurchBandit]

The Bible (n different languages) is either <u>translated by t/<b>SAME PEOPLE</b></u> or use t/<u><b>English version</b> as t/<b>TEMPLATE</b></u> (copy it exactly n other languages). Hence, t/KJV n/Spanish, French, Romanian, etc. r exact copies f/t English Version. &#9827;

[SymonSehz]

THIS was FASCINATING!!!

[windmeal]

Gee! And just when I was thinking about becoming a "Mormon!" lol

[ChurchBandit]

I always <b>aim 2 please</b>! &#9827;

[ChilliiWillii]

I need a break! Let me rest MY BRAIN before I tackle the next Vid.

[KanadaDry]

Amen to that!

[ChurchBandit]

Hi <b>letitbe</b>

My goal <u>is not</u> 2 prove whether or not <b>Genesis</b> is real. For all any of us know, <b>it's all fiction</b>! But I am comparing t/<u>English texts</u> w/t <u>Hebrew texts</u>. <b>Nothing more</b>! &#9827;

[letitbe1027]

you proved then that the genesis is real?.. thats what the video says..

[ChurchBandit]

Hi <b>everlg</b>

An <b>assumption</b> is based on <b>speculation</b>. Hence, <b>no investigation</b>, <b>no research</b>. Which means, <b>assumption</b> & <b>research</b> r a <b>contradiction n terms</b>. If something is <u>based on research</u> (like my videos) then <u>it <b>CEASES</b> 2/b an <b>ASSUMPTION</b></u>.

[ChurchBandit]

With that said, <u>everything u currently believe 2/b true</u> but <b>NEVER DID ANY RESEARCH</b> 2 <u>confirm its validity</u> ... <b>IS AN ASSUMPTION</b>. &#9827;

[everlg]

can you provide me with links to the scholars who believe the same please

[ChurchBandit]

There r <b>different types f/Scholars</b> who <u>only research 2/t extent f/what their religion teaches</u>. So if u want <b>unbiased conclusions</b> it s/better 2 <b>do ur own research</b>. &#9827;

[everlg]

i've always wanted to do research about religion since i dont think the bible is telling the whole truth. since the bible is written by humans i suppose there are a lot of errors in it but to be honest unless i find emperical evidence about it being a lie everything is just assumptions. like your video i think is very interesting but all based in assumptions that very well could be possible but then again it remains a mistery if its true.

[ChurchBandit]

Hi <b>everlg</b>, again. Maybe this. Maybe that.

Unless u <b>do research</b> u can <b>speculate all day</b>. =<i>Maybe I was smok'in my crack pipe when I put this video together</i>= But I suppose I made similar speculation w/<b>those who translated t/Bible</b> back n 1611. And as a result, <b>I did <u>MY OWN</u> research</b>.

[ChurchBandit]

I fail 2/c how <b>documented facts</b> can b deemed <b>speculation</b>. When <b>Webster</b> provides u w/a <b>definition</b> is it <b>speculation</b>? The <b>upside</b> s/that <b>ANYONE</b> can <u>look this stuff up on their own</u>. -<b>HINT</b>- I would appreciate it more if someone <u>did that</u>, drew a <b>different conclusion</b> & then <b>presented their argument</b>. &#9827;

[everlg]

again, you're basing everything on assumptions. you are just assuming something lead to something else and so on. like i said before apart from all your assumptions maybe you're hebrew is different from the old testament hebrew. maybe your logic is flawed and your hebrew is not as accurate as you think.

[ChurchBandit]

I got preoccupied w/something else but t/next <b>Video Segment</b> s/b posted @ some point over t/weekend. &#9827;

[OutrLiimitz]

Well .. HURRY UP!!!

[snowlobo]

A wild ride indeed! What else do you have in store?

[VideoFoe]

MASTERFUL!

[JettLogg]

Now THIS is DEEP!

[CambricFinish]

&#9829; &#9829; &#9829; &#9829; &#9829;

[ChurchBandit]

Thanks <b>Cambric</b>!

[Antitheistguy]

very informative! thanks for the scholarship!

[JumpNjackZ]

Think about this: Moses was "the only educated Hebrew." He was the only candidate qualified to lead. All other Hebrews were "uneducated" slaves in Egypt.

[bubbledumm]

I see the logic. Moses was raised in Egyptian royalty, right? Therefore, he received the best education that Egypt could offer. Moses attended the "Harvard" of Egypt. So, Moses learned all about Egyptian deities. What better way for a deity to have approached Moses than as one of the Egyptian deities he was so familiar with?

[Karinelenika]

Awsome. Today the only religious who use this name are the Jeovah testimonies. I knew this Hebrew god had a further origin, but I wouldn't think it was Egyptian. It is funny because in Exodus, Yaweh is really wicked with Egypt!

[SeaBiscuiit]

This Site has been pretty wild since I last visited!

[VideoJosephine]

Should you really take everything so literal?  I'm still trying to figure out how the "1st day (Let there be light)" happened when the Sun was made on 4th day.

[LTCJeffWhite]

"Yom" when uses with an ordinal number (1st, 2nd, 3rd) and "evening" and "morning," as in the 1st Chptr of GEN, leaves little room for misinterpretation. This is a 24-hour period.

And what about plants created on one day, and the sun on another?

It misuses Scripture to force 100s of 1000s of years between these days.

Again, why a seven day week worldwide?

[msmetrokite]

It seems to me that you completely overlooked the entire point of the video.

[UncleFesterFrump]

There are those of us who see the "perfect sense" in these video segments. Just because you don't doesn't mean the work is corrupt. Get over it. Let it go. Move on.