Added: 4 years ago
From: dharmamarx
Views: 10,919
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (279)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • when i was locked up in HMP Pentonville, I heard in the yard a black guy say to another "it aint about black and white it's about rich and poor!" NUFF SAID.

  • Paradoxically, this reversal will also affirm it. This has played out throughout history. English people came from Celts, Romans, Saxons, and Normans over time. Overtime, there will be a solid "American" ethnicity.

  • it wasnt as easy as white flight it probly involved a lot of high interest loans and in debt up to their eyeballs and shady loan sharks fancy sells campaigns after world war 2 the subburbs started to be built and the infrastructure to support it all then housing loans.2 kids 2 cars 2 houses and dogs how did they do it.

  • Clip is from "Bastards Of The Party" documentary, in case you want to watch it. watch?v=Be1i6nX2NIs

  • @saveranger Thank you.

  • What is the name of this documentary? I would lie to buy a copy of it. Please tell me the name of it.

  • Beginning 0:06, Davis and the young man at his side are standing in the main room of the Southern California Library on Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles. The SCL is an amazing research institution with documents going back many decades. The focus of the library's holdings is mostly the leftist history ignored by the mainstream. In the background on the wall (~0:09) is a painting of Ho Chi Minh with the large yellow star half-hidden behind his head (amongst other figures).

  • I also have 2 brothers one is bigot he's older than I am my younger brother isn't my older brother wasn't all ways that way until he was attacked for being white too many times. my younger brother by the time he was in HS the late 70's the white vs black fighting was over unless you were getting robbed. But the I'm black you're white we gonna fight was over, for the most people.

  • I'm telling the truth I got into it with black kids too many times won some lost some. i have busted knuckles and had busted lips and nose to prove it . As I got older and made friends with other black kids playing ball we fought with each other against the Hells Angels one time, and they stuck up for me against any "bro" who wanted to hurt me.Oakland in the 70's and 80's wasn't the typical city. But I'm not nor were my friends typical.

  • Well now L.A. has 'black flight' where blacks are moving to better neighborhoods and Hispanics are replacing them.

  • Don't buy into the bullshit, though. Most of them aren't doing it because it's what's best for humanity. If that were the case, the Venus Project or some other science and technology-centric recreation of civilization would be well under way. Many are doing it for nothing more than personal self-interest. Many are doing it, using vengeance as an excuse. Many are doing it because it's easier than building their own from the ground up to a civilization that rivals that of America's or Europe's.

  • And, while we're at it.......can you refute any of these facts?

    antifascistencyclopedia{dot}co­m/allposts/bloomberg-news-nazi­-coverup-a-shame

    antifascistencyclopedia{dot}co­m/allposts/four-ways-the-u-s-h­elped-nazi-war-criminals

    antifascistencyclopedia{dot}co­m/allposts/new-york-times-pseu­do-revelations-nazis-given-saf­e-haven-in-the-usa

    antifascistencyclopedia{dot}co­m/allposts/the-murderers-among­-us

    antifascistencyclopedia{dot}co­m/allposts/did-texan-help-nazi­-goring-cheat-the-hangman-2

  • @MiracleMile90 It's true. Every facet of humanity has been guilty of horrible crimes. From ritualistic cannibalism to ritualistic mutilation. From slavery to genocide. What it all boils down to is: every facet of humanity wants their piece of the pie. They use any excuse in the book, including guilt, the idea that is "good" and "righteousness" to get it. They'll back people into a corner, they'll argue, intimidate, impose and attack until they've gotten what they want.

  • This is one of the reasons why California is broke, no money. The more whites any geographical region has, the more that state will enjoy prosperity. Whites are all but gone from California. The US Census forms are deceptive, for many Hispanics will check the WHITE box on the form. Let California sink into the ocean for all we care. Good riddance.

  • @joe80dman: And you call yourself a Christian..............I see right thru you; you're just another two-bit white supremacist looking for his approval from the REAL elites of the NWO.

  • @MiracleMile90 Truth is truth. Facts are facts. Maybe it's time to face up to it.

  • @VirikNavarro: What truth? What facts? All you WN fascists, like joe80dman here, have to offer is pseudoscience and fascist propaganda to back up your beliefs.

  • Comment removed

  • @MiracleMile90 Speaking of fascism: Rome did not allow even all citizens to vote - only the elite (optimo jure) could vote - in this way, they subdued the influence of multiculturalism (Romans weren't as stupid as we are) and non-nationalists (you). It wasn't until 212 AD that all free men in Rome could vote - this was a capitulation to the civil unrest created by growing numbers of non-Romans - multiculturalism - and was the point of no return.

  • @MiracleMile90 Your doing classic leftist critique - that's easy; offer one of your own - how did multiculturalism benefit Rome?

    Anyway - corruption -I've answered that, the empire was in decline; corruption is fostered in that environment. Similarly, the U.S. govt is corrupt, corporations are corrupt - nationalism is lacking; "Duty, Honor, Country" is passe. Corruption was low while Rome was Roman.

    Non-sequitur? Voting = influence; was the influence of blacks not subdued under Jim Crow?

  • @GTBeauregard: " this was a capitulation to the civil unrest created by growing numbers of non-Romans - multiculturalism - and was the point of no return."

    And you arrived at this conclusion how, exactly? One thing's for certain: even in its heyday, certain factions within the Roman government were STILL oppressing people from time to time(Remember those tales about Christians being thrown to the lions?). And that WAS a problem.

  • @MiracleMile90 Its not possible to "prove" any of this. Its a matter of looking at patterns and coming to a logical conclusion. I don't feel that you are being honest in your assessment. There is not ONE multicultural society that has persisted into the modern age yet there are monocultures that have- that is an important observation. There are examples of multicultural becoming monocultural l- North Africa - but that involved complete genetic mixing.

  • @GTBeauregard: I can say this: empires whose leaders had made ethnic hatred a, or THE key factor in their expansion & conquests, tended not to last very long afterwards for the most part. The Mongols were lucky and held on for about 200 years after their conquests, but South Africa only lasted just under half a century.....Tojo's Japan for only around 20.....and Nazi Germany only lasted 12 years. Think about that.

  • @MiracleMile90 It is actually just the opposite - I wouldn't use the word hatred (I understand that's one of the left's go to words) - I'd say nationalism. Successful nations understand that a nation is nothing more than a people united by ethnicity - Japan.

  • @GTBeauregard: " Successful nations understand that a nation is nothing more than a people united by ethnicity - Japan."

    Maybe in Imperial Japan, but that just isn't how most modern Japanese today think.........kinda like saying that all Israelis are rabid Betar Zionists or that all Serbs are psycho wanna-be Croat killers.

    Stereotypes don't really help anybody in the long-run..........even groups who might benefit from such.

  • @MiracleMile90 Um, Japan is 99.9% Japanese, has very strict immigration laws.....do you ever admit you're wrong?

  • @MiracleMile90 You are dishonest. You implied that modern Japanese didn't think that way. What way? You were replying to my comment "Successful nations understand that a nation is nothing more than a people united by ethnicity - Japan." Plain as day you are dishonest.

    Then you go onto some crap about food distribution - you are a JOKE.

  • @GTBeauregard: As for the food distribution thing: they really are one of the world's largest importers of food. Google it.

    And as for Japan's ethnic issues? Well, yes, they do exist......particularly as far as government is concerned. However, I see nothing to indicate that most Japanese are anything but decent & respectful folks.

  • @MiracleMile90 Stop trying to argue and comprehend. You seem to unable to grasp my simple words.

    Japan is a monoculture, it has survived for thousands of years.

    Japan has a strict immigration policy to keep Japan Japanese -

    Japan has very low crime.

    Japan's fertility rate is below replacement - since you brought population up for some reason.

    Would you like to see Japan become multicultural? Its so great for us, so why not them?

  • @MiracleMile90 Interesting, how long has Italy been a nation? Would you also claim that Tunisia has spanned from ancient to present? - I have to assume you think Tunisia and Carthage are one in the same, similar to Ancient Rome and Italy right? Maybe Israel (the nation) is actually thousands of yeas old.

    You consider India a successful country - you must have no problem with caste systems or organ selling; or rank poverty.

    What are the benefits of multiculturalism? How does it help?

  • @GTBeauregard: "Interesting, how long has Italy been a nation?" As a political entity? 150 years as of now.

    But as a recognizable culture? Perhaps as long as 2,700 years, going back to right around the time of Rome. Things do change, however.

  • @GTBeauregard: "You consider India a successful country - you must have no problem with caste systems or organ selling; or rank poverty."

    India does have a few problems to sort out, yes. But again, in that country's case it hardly has anything to do with multiculturalism.

  • @GTBeauregard: " What are the benefits of multiculturalism? How does it help?"

    If you want an obvious example, look at the United States. This entire country's culture, was practically built on it: Immigrants of all sorts contributed various pieces of their cultures that made their way into the mainstream: The Italians gave us pizza, The Swedes the smorgasbord, The Mexicans had various things, etc. (and don't forget the African-Americans with jazz, blues, soul food, etc.)

  • @MiracleMile90: I could go on, but I REALLY shouldn't have to at this point. Now, again, tell me: how does forcing uniethnicity on a society benefit those people in that society(and no, you can't use Japan to try to prove your point, either, that country's restrictions are largely based on the fact that that country is rather overcrowded from top to bottom)?

  • @GTBeauregard: And, again, need I refer once again to Nazi Germany? Or how about Rhodesia? The adoption of hardline racism in their governmental system didn't work out too well for them, either.

  • @MiracleMile90 Germany, as well as Germans, is still in existence for now. Rhodesia was swarmed by a much larger enemy - that is not the same as collapsing internally. South Africa will be in ruins in 20 years as well. You're still batting a zero. Name a multicultural civilization that has lasted. Just one. You've critiqued my argument for some time, please state an example one successful multicultural state.

  • @GTBeauregard: " Rhodesia was swarmed by a much larger enemy"

    Rhodesia wasn't invaded at all in 1980 as far as I know. You see? You're lying again.

    " Name a multicultural civilization that has lasted."

    Canada's done pretty well(hopefully their government doesn't become as conservative & corrupt as the U.S.'s has) over the past 140 years or so.

  • @MiracleMile90 Swarmed by black Africans.

    Canada is not historic.

    Conservative? Feminism, gay adoption, affirmative action, quotas, legalized porn on internet, welfare, medicaid, lesbian insemination, mass immigration, homosexual education in grade school, noble savage myth ...what in the hell is conservative about the U.S.? What has been CONSERVED?

  • @GTBeauregard: " Swarmed by black Africans." Swarmed, huh? I have to laugh at the fact that you used that word...........but then again, it's no surprise you'd used such a casually dehumanizing word.......

  • @GTBeauregard:

    Now try to name a country whose society has placed racial divisions & bigotry on the highest pedestal that didn't either see a major war costing them many lives or their society brought to ruins, or if a nation in existence today, that DOESN'T have serious societal, corruption, or even economic problems.

  • @MiracleMile90

    Most countries have placed race on a pedestal and done very well, better than multicultural experiments - Japan; any Western white nation (except Spain/Portugal) before 1960, when your group took over. Racial divisions - every nation that ever had slaves. If you mean racial divisions among citizens then your getting into multi-racial demographics - national suicide; I don't promote multiracial societies of course.

  • @GTBeauregard: "Most countries have placed race on a pedestal and done very well" Not true, and certainly not in the way you white supremacists have. Not a single country has done that and survived for all that long(there may be one or 2 exceptions; most likely including the Mongols) without some sort of failure, or being conquered. Look at what happened with Japan when Tokyo adopted fascist & eugenicist thinking; they only lasted maybe slightly over 50 years afterwards.

  • @MiracleMile90: And then, once again, we have Nazi Germany, a country which put 'the race' on the almighty pedestal above all else, and look what happened there! Not only was much of the place brought to ruin, but it even led to the murders of 12 to 15 million innocents during the Holocaust(this may not include POWs, either), all because they didn't conform or belong to the 'Aryan race'!

  • @MiracleMile90 ? Wasn't Nazi Germany in a war? I think the Allies had a little to do with Nazi Germany's defeat. That's like saying Estonia's society was obviously flawed because they were conquered by the USSR. We're talking about internal collapse not losing a war.

  • @MiracleMile90 Japan has strict immigration policies based on RACE - read it again if you have to. Its not that they keep out Africans and Gypsies - they won't even let a Korean become a citizen. I'd say that would qualify as a country that has placed race on a pedestal. As far as "bigotry" and "divisions" - they have very few non-Japanese for which to apply these treatments.  Funny, racial bigotry is only possible in a heterogenous demographic.

  • @GTBeauregard: And here's the thing with Japan:

    I don't doubt that a small amount of xenophobia exists in certain members of the population, and certainly within factions of the Diet in Tokyo, BUT.......it's not quite the same as biological racism here.

    Frankly, it looks like most Japanese don't seem to care about the immigration policies either way; they don't want to force other people to stay out.........but they don't see any major issues either.

  • @MiracleMile90: However, though, I am willing to bet that there are some Japanese who are aware of the flaws which do exist in the system and would like to see them fixed.

  • @MiracleMile90 : Read the Scriptures in the New Testament again where Christ will once again "separate the nations (nationalities)". Race mixing isn't Christian, it's Babylonian, an instrument of Satan!

    And don't listen to the blacks in this video who claim they were called "nigger" by white kids. Blacks are always exaggerating, even concocting stories to conjure excuses for their endeavors.

    Todays so-called Christianity has been feminized beyond imagination.

  • @joe80dman: "Read the Scriptures in the New Testament again where Christ will once again "separate the nations (nationalities)". Race mixing isn't Christian, it's Babylonian, an instrument of Satan!"

    Nothing to do with 'race mixing', contrary to 'Christian' 'Identity' doctrine.

  • @joe80dman: "Blacks are always exaggerating, even concocting stories to conjure excuses for their endeavors."

    Nope, in fact, on the contrary{I don't doubt there's a few bad apples in the black community.}: you'll never really hear much of this in mainstream history books{or media, for that matter, unless they are forced to}, but once upon a time, if anything, there were always some racist WHITES who concocted stories to get blacks in trouble, especially down south.

  • @joe80dman: "Todays so-called Christianity has been feminized beyond imagination." And you know this because of whom? Pete Peters? David Duke? Bertrand Comparet? Or, god forbid, William L. Pierce?

  • @joe80dman: And finally, if interracial brotherhood is such a bad thing, then tell me: Why did the globalists have Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X murdered?{And yet, the only white supremacist who ended up dying an early and unnatural death before 1980 was George Rockwell, and he was a top puppet who was sacrificed by them. Why exactly? Nobody really knows for sure.}

  • @joe80dman: In any case, this whole 'WACE MIXING IS EVUWWW!' crap is just another divide-and-conquer tactic used by the elites and their shills and perhaps the occasional useful idiot{hell, even a few BLACK nationalists are guilty of this.}.

  • @joe80dman: And finally, of course, you can't deny that the globalists forced their segregation and race-based eugenics crap on us either........nor you can you deny the fact that MANY people in this country had their 1st Amendment Freedom of Association provisions violated when interracial marriage was illegalized on a grand scale back in the 19th century.

  • @MiracleMile90 If some of the things I've been reading and reviewing are true, then, you don't have a leg to stand on in your arguments. Though, I won't post any of the sources here because some of them are blatantly racially motivated. You're free to perform your own research. Crime statistics are a good start. The state of Haiti is another good example, though. South Africa, just as interesting.

  • @MiracleMile90

    You're right. All we (we, being human beings, not necessarily WN, BN, HN, AN, CN, JN or any other label you can come up with) have is information. Whether or not the information is true and factual has great bearing on the decisions we have to make. Where the information comes from, on the other hand, means virtually nothing. That is to say, if a rabid dog presented me with information, I would research, test for truth and then proceed to act, if necessary.

  • @MiracleMile90 : You have it backwards. The globalists dream is to foster interracial marriage, and to transform humans into a creamy colored, curly-haired society. Haven't you noticed how TV, and movies encourage interracial dating?

    The best way to combat racism is by separation, with each racial group responsible for their own economy, education, infrastructure, and laws. Nothing else will work.

  • @joe80dman: "The best way to combat racism is by separation, with each racial group responsible for their own economy, education, infrastructure, and laws. Nothing else will work."

    And look how that kind of thinking worked out so far; Fascist and inhumane apartheid in South Africa, the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians, etc.

    You are only promoting a divide-and-conquer strategy. It is QUITE obvious to anyone who has half a brain, or isn't shilling.

  • @joe80dman: " Nothing else will work." That isn't true and you know this...........why else were people like Martin Luther King, Jr, Malcolm X, and others murdered?

    Racial unity is a threat to the globalists, and you know it. Yet you continue to spread lies all over the place.

  • @MiracleMile90 : MLK was taken out by the FBI before he was scheduled to make a supportive speech for Palestinian rights. Of course James Earl Ray was the patsy. Racial harmony is a farce, it never works. There will always be finger pointing of who has more than the other group, and blah, blah, blah. There has never been a successful multi-ethnic society in world history, and there never will be no matter how many laws are passed to encourage it.

  • @joe80dman: "MLK was taken out by the FBI before he was scheduled to make a supportive speech for Palestinian rights." That is highly dubious at best, and even if that were true, that certainly wasn't one of the main reasons for him being offed.

    "Racial harmony is a farce, it never works." It can work. The globalists just don't want it to...........look at all of what they and their henchmen have been responsible for in the States for example: Jim Crow and segregation..........

  • .........mob lynchings of minorities{almost always on a false pretense}, especially by and/or inspired by, the KKK, the infiltration and discreditation of the black youth movement in the 1960s..........yeah, anybody who isn't brainwashed can plainly see that frankly, it does smack of a conspiracy of some kind.

  • @joe80dman: "There will always be finger pointing of who has more than the other group, and blah, blah, blah." There would only be a very small fraction of that sort of behavior going on., compared to now, if it weren't for all of what the globalists have done over the past 400 years.

  • @joe80dman: "There has never been a successful multi-ethnic society in world history," Well, technically...............

    Rome lasted for about 1,100 years before its breakup{despite all the corruption in its imperial days.}, The Byzantine Empire for about 1,000 years, the Ottomans for just under 500, and it does appear that India, faults and all, lasted a few THOUSAND years before Britain invaded.

  • @MiracleMile90 Rome began to decline when Romans became non-white - Romans commented on the whiteness of the Goths -this is not conjecture. Rome incorporated the people of Africa and the Middle East and so became multi-racial. A country cannot survive competing racial factions.

  • @GTBeauregard: Like it or not the 'non-whites' were there in Rome, long before it began to collapse.

  • @MiracleMile90 Yes, and their influence grew until Rome was no longer Roman.

  • @GTBeauregard: And, btw, if all uniethnic societies are so peaceful, try to explain why the Japan of 500 years ago was so totally war-torn in many places.

  • @MiracleMile90 Of course they are not peaceful, no Empire has ever been peaceful - the two terms are mutually exclusive.

  • @MiracleMile90 Rome fell to multiculturalism, Byzantium was the result of Rome's decline (please tell me about the great conquests of Byzantium:)).

    India is not successful - its a teaming mass of poor and has a caste system to control the colored masses.

    Ottoman Empire - Muslim society has not fallen as opposed to Byzantium et al., in fact the Muslim area of influence is still growing - mono-culture is a uniter, multi-culture- just look at the word; might as well say multi-loyalties .

  • @joe80dman: And, having thought about it further, even Britain did okay, considering all the immigrants{or settlers, whatever you wish to call them}that came to that country.

  • @MiracleMile90 Japan - Rome had internal wars as well, prior to multiculturalism, and collapsed, Japan has been Japan for thousands of years - because it has stayed Japanese.

    Britain is doing OK - care to rethink that after the multicultural riots?

  • @GTBeauregard: "Japan has been Japan for thousands of years - because it has stayed Japanese."

    Societies can change, you know. Hell, Japan's transformation from a rather backwards and wartorn state to a functioning democracy took only about slightly less than a century, and that's WITH the notable interruption caused by the Japanese fascists(Tojo and co.).

  • @MiracleMile90 How is that relevant? The topic is the fall of Empires/peoples, due to or not due to, multiculturalism. Japan has not fallen, Rome has.

  • @MiracleMile90 Racial unity is not possible - where has it worked? If you mean racial mixing until everyone is the same color - that's totally different. Yet, that will never happen as people are naturally choose to be with the same race. It is a recipe for societal breakdown - same thing happened in Rome, Persia, Greece,

  • @GTBeauregard: " It is a recipe for societal breakdown - same thing happened in Rome, Persia, Greece," Racial composition had NOTHING to do with the fall of Rome no matter what the 'Christian' 'Identity' people(and many of the other pro-Establishment extremist racists too.) want you to think. Rather, it was high-level corruption, infrastructural decay, amongst other NON-RACIAL things. Can you wrap that around your head or will you continue to be a stupid brainwashed sheep?

  • @MiracleMile90 Christian? - where'd you pull that from? Funny, all great Empires that have fallen have one thing in common - the original people were diluted (except Sparta). Would increased civil violence between immigrant and native be a "non-racial" factor? Or socioeconomic? Increasing numbers of non-natives in anti-traditionalist interest groups - non-racial?

    High level corruption and infrastructure decay would be  expected in a declining society - take a look at the U.S..

  • @GTBeauregard: " Funny, all great Empires that have fallen have one thing in common - the original people were diluted (except Sparta)."

    Not true. Here are several examples:

    1.)The Mongols-this MONO-ETHNIC society expanded way too quickly for their own good.

    2.)Nazi Germany-same problem as the Mongols. Not to mention the persecution & mass murder of various ethnic & religious groups was bound to cause eventual unrest anyway.

  • @MiracleMile90 The Mongols were never conquered; they never assimilated until they conquered China, had a short-lived dynasty - Yuan, and accepted multiculturalism; it was only then that the Mongols were defeated and dispersed. That the Yuan dynasty allowed multiculturalism is accepted history.

    Germany is still present and so are Germans but not for long - multicult. is only 30 years old in Germany.

  • @GTBeauregard: "The Mongols were never conquered;" They didn't really need to be in that case. Their decline was permanent. And as for this: " they never assimilated until they conquered China.......Yuan, and accepted multiculturalism;" It's bogus.

  • @MiracleMile90 Sure, if you say so. You'll have a lot of historians to convince though.

    "There decline was permanent" - yes, and your point? If they were not conquered why did they decline? They were not overstretched, they were ruling China. What happened? Please try to come up with something other than "bogus".

  • @GTBeauregard: " Please try to come up with something other than "bogus"."

    And try to come up with some REAL evidence for your 'multicultural Mongols' claim. And then after that, try to provide NON-BIASED evidence that race-based bigotry benefits the whole of any nation in the long run.

  • @MiracleMile90 So now I have to come up with evidence to prove that multicultural societies don't last? The evidence is that every multicultural society has failed- name one that has not. Your lack of knowledge requires me to teach you history - I don't think so. Go to an encyclopedia and read on the Yuan dynasty - or wallow in your ignorance, I don't care.

    You have yet to name a multicultural civilization that has made it to modernity -the premise of the discussion.

  • @GTBeauregard: " Go to an encyclopedia and read on the Yuan dynasty - or wallow in your ignorance, I don't care."

    I didn't say anything about the Yuan Empire and you know it. I said that I see no evidence that the Mongols accepted any real form of multiculturalism.

  • @MiracleMile90 The Yuan Dynasty was the Mongol empire -it was its last conquest - it died there in 100 years., not from outside attack but from internal policies of multiculturalism.

  • @GTBeauregard: "So now I have to come up with evidence to prove that multicultural societies don't last?"

    WTF? Looks like this attempt at word twisting just failed you, pal. =)

  • @GTBeauregard:

    3.)The Aztecs-Largely due to Spanish conquest, but various other factors as well. As with the Mongols & Hitler's Germany no large-scale 'dilution'(really?) .

    4.)Japan-They, too, went on an over-expansion frenzy and stretched their military almost to its limits. Again, how did mono-ethnicity save the Japanese Empire from its demise in '45?

  • @MiracleMile90 I'm not sure of your point. Aztecs were never a great civilization. Hitler's Germany is just a piece of German history - Germany will cease to exist once ethnic Germans are in the minority. Just as Boers are now a remnant and will be gone in a few generations.

    Japan still exists! It is 100% Japanese. It is saved. Are you being honest in your argument? Can you say the same for Rome?

  • @GTBeauregard: " Germany will cease to exist once ethnic Germans are in the minority. Just as Boers are now a remnant and will be gone in a few generations."

    Still doesn't prove any of your points. The German people will pretty much always be here, even if by some chance, a substantial portion of them do intermarry. Same for the Boers.

    "Are you being honest in your argument?" Are you?............yeah, I didn't think so.

  • @MiracleMile90 What? " The German people will pretty much always be here, even if by some chance, a substantial portion of them do intermarry. " And Portugal is full of Portuguese! All you can do is lamely critique my position - offer an example of a successful, enduring multicultural state. You've tried India, Rome, and Byzantium. Why not Portugal? Thoughts?

  • @GTBeauregard: "And Portugal is full of Portuguese."

    Portugal's empire didn't die out due to 'race-mixing' either.

  • @MiracleMile90 Right, because you've been so knowledgable thus far. Is Portugal full of Portugese?

  • @MiracleMile90 Here's multicultural Portugal - a multicultural street battle with guns.

    watch?v=LZiqe9h4KgU

  • @GTBeauregard:

    5.)Britain's decline-Again, NOT due to 'dilution'. Britain had some serious trouble keeping many of their colonies in line starting right around the end of WWII, and frankly, many of the indigenous peoples were just sick and tired of living under a system that didn't actually benefit them, only the elites at the very top.

    6.)Mexico-not really an empire for most of it's existence, but Mexico has had a long history of on-and-off political corruption.......

  • ........However, an interesting thing about Mexico is, there are actually more ethnic groups than many know. Some of them, include such ethnicities as the Cornishmen from Britain, and some Germans as well. And, for the most part, ETHNIC tensions aren't much of an issue today, at least not in southern Mexico, from what can be gathered.

  • @MiracleMile90 Mexican Indians are as segregated and powerless as U.S. Indians.

  • @MiracleMile90 I'm speaking of cultural decline in the state itself - sorry for the confusion.

  • @GTBeauregard: "Christian? - where'd you pull that from?"

    You twisted my words here, it seems(either that, or you can't really read for shit. Or maybe you're just a lazy imbecile. Maybe both. =)). I was obviously referring to the Christian Identity cult which since it's birth early this last century, has been one of the key progenitors of this little 'racial dilution' theory you seem to buy into so much.

  • @MiracleMile90 That's a guilt by association argument and therefor ignored - I could just as easily connect you with Trotsky.

  • @GTBeauregard: " Would increased civil violence between immigrant and native be a "non-racial" factor?"

    Here's the thing: for the most part, it tends to occur in countries whose governments have, or had had long histories of persecuting and abusing minorities within their borders(or majorities, as was the case in S. Africa before 1994). And when not, divide-and-conquer is utilized, a fact that seems to be rather inconvenient for you.

  • @MiracleMile90 Interracial or cultural violence is always there no matter what the history - bring in a large enough group (too large for assimilation) and you'll have conflict - the history of how they got into the country doesn't matter (take Muslims in Britain - no slavery) - past wrongs causing violence is just a rationalization for an obviously flawed system..

  • @GTBeauregard: " Interracial or cultural violence is always there no matter what the history - bring in a large enough group (too large for assimilation) and you'll have conflict"

    *Sigh* yes, a small amount of intrapersonal, and even occasion intraregional conflict fact is, two groups who aren't constantly being set against each other tend to get along well for the most part, especially in democratic nations.

    Take a look at the Italians and the Jews in N.Y.C. for example....

  • ...they used to be rivals, some of them. But once the divide-and-conquer crap came to a stop, they stopped fighting en masse and started getting along.

  • @MiracleMile90 Which Jews? Hassidic - yeah, there's not much getting along I'm afraid, next? Non-Orthodox atheist Jews?; then you might as well have compared Irish and Italian. Jews are white I believe.

    You'd describe the relation between Blacks and Koreans as "a small amount of intrapersonal" conflict? Race riots? Random racial attacks? Public schools? Crime rates by race would be an eye opener.

    100% of rapes in Norway are committed by Muslims - *sigh*

  • @joe80dman: And btw, you STILL haven't tried to refute any of the links that I have posted on here. None. That tells me you are definitely afraid of the truth, somehow.

  • Obviously these blacks are exaggerating, or even concocting what occurred in this time era. Racial oppression is their never ending Trump Card, and they won't let this get away. It's allowed them to flourish at the expense of others.

  • america bought african slaves because it was cheaper than indentured servants and you never had to let them go. Europeans bought slaves from an already old established slave trade system in Africa run by natives. It was common for tribes to fight for more glory by collecting slave. SLAVERY BEGAN WITH CIVILIZATION stop acting like whites deserve all the credit. Humans treated each other like shit get over it and move on because your just feeding the fire of racism.

  • Man I'm reading all these racist comments, it is like no one is actually watching this vid and learning from it. White street gangs were one of the reasons why there are Black and Latino/Hispanic street gangs. Watch the whole documentary and learn something you stupid inbred racist sensitive basterds.

  • California is ALREADY a NON-White state. You do not hear about this in the American media, because whites will start to act up.The RICH whites don't care because their mansions are surrounded by high walls and attack dogs. Mexicans invaded with no limits, Blacks are being pushed into the Pacific and whites are not going to stop it. Asians are marrying whites like crazy 'cause they know what is coming. Blacks are over in CA. Very sad race games in America.

  • I'm white, and have experienced racism from BLACK people!!! I'm not saying that it couldn't have started with white gangs, but now it's surely black (and other minority) gangs who do the terrorizing. So, yes, white flight has real reasons for doing so!

  • Here's my perspective. I know quite a few black people who have values, work hard and contribute to society. However they are over shadowed by the droves of animal thugs who infest most urban areas. The minorities move in and the whites move out. Property values plummet and in a matter of 10 years a nice city turns to a slum. It's sickening.

  • this is very true

  • I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal.

    ABRAHAM LINCOLN

  • @Reveal1912: "Therefore it is both healthy and positive." *Sighs*. We don't live in prehistoric times anymore, buddy. We now live in a world were it is absolutely required that we work together as humans to resolve differences or face our continued destruction.

  • Compton looks so much more beautiful in the 40's, 50's and 60's. Blacks ruin every place they move into. Just look at Detroit! WHITE FLIGHT

  • @wijse I HOPE THINGS TURN FOR THE BETTER IN AMERICA: WHITE DOMINATION

  • @IISANIIDIEGOIISURFII your just as bad as black supremacists. What you should support is I dont give a fuck about skin colour domination.

  • Notice how more and more ghetto and dangerous areas become when minorities take control of them?

  • @IISANIIDIEGOIISURFII research that fid out why

  • Racism exists because a multiracial society is made because the indigenous folk do not want to pay taxes or lose their jobs to foreigners.

  • What the hell is going on? Ireland is being infested with fake asylum seekers demanding Ireland change for them and the USA is being infested with illegal mexicans who think they have the right to be here and the right to demand we speak spanish, but asking them to speak English is considered racist.

    Britain is being invaded by muslims who demand Britain change for them or it's racism.

    When do we get to play the race card to get our every want and demand met? What country can we invade?

  • It's all about keeping the working class down! The people who own the mega-farms and factorys always want lower wages and race or religion are a way to divide people. That's why they don't stop immigration.

    The Irish were played off against the Chinese when building the transcontinatal railroad. Blacks competed with Irish in northern cities during the Civil War. Neither group could go back where they came from...nor did they want to.

  • The place looks so much nicer and family oriented since those evil whites left!

  • you do know blacks were the first to own slaves rght?? egyptians were black even proved by documents and what they looked like only recently ine thousand years have alot of them been drivin out by the arabs. hate people calling white people evil and shit. were all humans but if u wanna get all technical blacks started all this slavery shit. aslo some believe albinos are actually whites. that they were kciked out of african trives because of skin and now its just revenge for blacks being racist.

  • Racism exists because that is part of human nature because morons like you create a multiracial society

  • "Racism" (I hate that word) is deeply ingrained into human nature, it is a part of who and what we are.

    To deny it is to put yourself into a psychological strait jacket.

  • @Pyropus would it be possible for us to go a whole day w/o having racism in the mix..Imean just 1 pittiful day?smh

  • @Pyropus Um, not really.

  • @Pyropus if race is a myth then so is racism. People who want to control the economy started racism and they are winning the battle. How long will it take for people to understand the difference. The man who talked about fighting white kids to the black kids I ended up fighting against because I was white, Where does it end when will it end? Being white in Oakland Ca was like having a target on your back. Until I was noticed as a good Basketball player, I fought with a black dude once a week.

  • every race hates another race no matter what.some whites hate blacks some hate hispanics some hate asians etc.and same goes with blacks some blacks hate whites some hate asians some hate hispanics etc.

  • The greatest racism today exists in Third World countries. They hate each other with everything from skin color to tribal alliances, religious differences to family honor killings. This is what America and Europe is importing by the millions and this is the future face of the world. You are nieve if you believe that we will change them and not the other way around. Look around - the US is allready well on it's way to Third World nation status.

  • Race is just a social construct. There are no biological races in humans. Once we realize that "race" is just how society labels us the power of that concept over our thoughts disappears. We have to be aware of how this invented concept affects people but we dont have to buy into the ideology of race.

  • Keep spreading the truth my brother(sicktoaster). keep breakin it down so racist people who dont understand can and catch on when you teach them something new and if they can't catch on it is because there heart,mind, and soul is full of hate,confusing,lack of understanding, and not being close with God because they hate with no good logic reasons.

  • for sure lol you dont see cats or dogs caring what color fur they have lol animals just see there both living things and love and help eachother and kill what fucks with them to much lol or need for food. all in all were just animals to many people seem to forget were just animals people

  • So do Blacks fight each other because there is no one else to fight. If they think White racism is gone they are crazy.

  • Whites exerted racism all over the world, they've made their bed now they should lay in it. And guess what I'm White.

  • Amen praise Jah the most high God n his soon Yeshua. amen 2 the truth i respect u so much for what u just said. At least somebody admitted to the truth. You are rite "you shall reap what u sow" they made their bed now they should lay in it. Its nothing but love over here for you. Keep in contact.

  • Sorry leftists, but your class warfare explanations don't hold water. Even if there were no rich ruling class, blacks and whites would still not get along.

    There are race riots in California schools all the time - but when did you ever hear about a fight between the "rich kids" and the "poor kids"? Doesn't happen.

    Race is a natural dividing line that transcends class.

  • i have friends of all races..

  • So do I. But that doesn't mean racial conflict doesn't exist.

    Yes, there will always be black and white individuals who get along with each other. But if left to their own (without government laws enforcing diversity) Blacks, Whites, Asians and Hispanics would just naturally drift apart from each other and form their own communities.

    And there is nothing wrong with that - racial community is perfectly natural, normal and healthy.

  • We are left to our own. The gov. doesnt tell u where 2 live. & yes there r some racial communities but then there r mixed communities 2 & as time goes on theres more & more interracial couples. Eventually these racial catagories will disapear. Phys. dif. will still b there because random combinations will sometiems produce them but skin color will become more like hair color in significance. Maybe w/ gene therapy in thefuture ppl will try on different skin colors the way ppl dye their hair 2day.

  • @sicktoaster The trend is towards racially homogenous communities, towns, and cities - you are incorrect.

  • @GTBeauregard

    I wasn't talking about the near trend I was talking about a longer term of time. When interracial marriage reaches a certain threshhold racial homogeneity will become untenable and the trend of homogenization will begin to reverse.

  • It doesnt happen because it is in the interests of the ruling class that working people fight over petty differences like race, religion, or sexual orientation instead of focusing their collective energies on their true interests.

  • Well, it's YOUR opinion that race, religion and sexual orientation are "petty differences". Many people take these differences quite seriously.

    Personally, I would rather live in a economically stratified white nation (with rich and poor whites living together) then to live in a multi-racial nation where everyone was economically "equal".

    Many whites feel that their "true interests" are being away from blacks and hispanics and having their own safe and civilized communities.

  • Yes well people can choose to take anything seriously. You are trying to say that there is something inherent about race that leads to this behavior rather than just what people have decided.

    Regardless they are petty differences because a persons race or sexual orientation doesn't hurt you in any way & neither does religion(not by itself anyways but ppl acting on certain fanatical beliefs can) so worrying about living next to ppl of another race is a waste of time & energy.

  • @utube9000 "Personally, I would rather live in a economically stratified white nation (with rich and poor whites living together) then to live in a multi-racial nation where everyone was economically "equal"."

    And which would you rather be: The rich white or the poor white? I'm guessing you'd put yourself in the rich category.

    And who would be the poor whites? I think we should ask those people in which category they would want to be.

  • @bapyou No, we don't need to ask people which economic category they want to belong to. Everyone would choose to be rich of course! So, it's a useless question.

    In a free society, economic stratification happens naturally. Smart & ambitious people will make more money than dumb & lazy people. But THAT'S OK - because many poor people lead happy lives and many rich people lead miserable lives. Most whites are financially poor - but their LIVES are richer if their community is peaceful.

  • @utube9000 "In a free society, economic stratification happens naturally. Smart & ambitious people will make more money than dumb & lazy people."

    Really? I see a lot of people working real hard that aren't rich.

    I also see people who don't work all that hard raking in a lot of money.

    Your theory is kind of weak.

    And if "smart" and "ambitious" people "make more money" explain how a dumb fuck like George W. Bush exists. My plumber is smarter than that asshole.

    Cheers, asshole.

  • @bapyou There was no reason to call me an asshole, I didn't insult you did I?

    I understand what you're saying - there are poor people who work hard and there are rich people who don't lift a finger. I understand that and I have no problem with having a social safety net to protect the vulnerable.

    However, the discussion was about race - and I'm saying that societies of people with different incomes get along easier than people of different races. Race is a natural fault line for humans.

  • @utube9000 "societies of people with different incomes get along easier than people of different races."

    Complete bullshit.

    "Fascism ... seeks consensus by exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference. The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus (proto)-Fascism is racist by definition." - Umberto Eco

    Did you even watch this video?