This guy comes up with a clean solution to our dirty problem and ends up dead. Everybody, thank OPEC for killing this guy off because OPEC is a bunch of greedy, selfish, murdering assholes!
Caveat 'FOX NEWS' is like reading the 'Globe' or the 'national enquirer' for scientific sources.
NO MENTION OF THE AGE OLD ANCIENT FACT THAT ELECTROLYOSIS TO SEPARATE HYDROGEN FROM WATER TAKES AS MUCH ENERGY AS GIVEN BY THE RESULTANT HYDROGEN! Nothing new here, only reinforcement that the idiotic synergy of Fox news and the Bush administration gave us the Iraq War! Fox assumes you are stupid so they can manipulate the public for corporate gain. Problem is they are RIGHT!
Wow what a wonderful idea. Why has no-one done this before? Imagine - a fuel tank in your car full of WATER! WATER! How wonderful. Think how safe that would be! No risk of gas tank explosion EVER. WOW. Cars will never explode in an accident ever again. WOW. This is so wonderful, so safe and so cheap. Why don't we all use this?
Oh, wait a minute - surely water is so safe because it is already at a low energy state? Don't we need to put at least 1kW INTO it in order to get 1kW energy OUT? hmm
The real funny thing is, is that most of the people that post about this must have an IQ of about -2. I am actually getting ready to make an "hho" generator to "hybrid" my '89 Civic. Not sure how he can patent it though as it has been a known process for quite a while.
um how could you pump hydrogen into your car. since its flame temperature adjusts to whatever its in contact with, wouldn't you end up melting your engine/????
If the government is buying into it and they engineer the system for everyday use, then there economies of scale would make HHO useful otherwise it would be scrapped.
I hope everyone realizes this is 100% FAKE. I would love "free" energy like this, but it doesn't exist. If anyone has seen electrolysis occur, it is a very slow process that requires a great deal of energy...more energy than is actually released by the combustion of hydrogen (because energy is lost to the environment, etc). Don't believe everything you see on TV. News anchors don't do much research anymore...they present what sounds good. And seriously, pay attention in chemistry class.
Electrolysis requres nest to no energy. Less than your car radio. Stan Meyer, Carl Cella, and Dingle all built succesful water powered cars, and I know a phycisict here in Philly who built a water powered car; its not that difficult. You are posting your ignorance of the technology. This can free us from dependence on Arab-and Venezuelan OIL.
I'm betting you've got no formal training in science. The basic laws of energy conservation (thermodynamics) dictate that the energy required to break a molecular bond (ie: turn water in to H2 and oxygen) is the same as the energy released by the formation of such bonds (burning H2 in oxygen to create water). There is simply know way known to conventional science that this fact can be ignored. Once you factor in inefficiencies, this idea is busted!
I do have a degree in science,and you are not familiar with the may techniqes and technologies.There is also dissciation of the water-molecule with radio-waves,vibrating at resonant-frequency of the water-molecule.The devices and cars are out there, like I said I personnly know someone who modified a car to run on water here in Philadelphia.Just ask around,I am sure even YOU can find the technologies.Carl Cell's water system was printed in NEXUS in 1996;you may access it on line to build it.
It doesn't matter what technique you use to break the molecular bonds between the hydrogen and oxygen, it's still going to take the same amount of energy as you get during the recombination. If you have discovered a way to defeat the laws of energy conservation and thermodynamics then you are about to become the richest man in the world.
Anyway its not ABOUT money. That kind of thouth-process has brought us to the terrible-trouble we face today, with Global-Warming out of control, and energy-prices. Our economy is based on CHEAP-energy. Rad about BROWN's GAS, google the aforementioned CARL CELLA, DINGLE, STAN MEYER videos are on youtube, JOE CELL and many other modern marvels. For someone supposedly well-versed in science, you seem ignorant of these methodologies, and others, many on YOUTUBE.
Build it yourself and decide if it works or not, just as my physicist-friend in Philly has, 11-years ago. Plans are online. That is a challenge, are you afraid of success? And we shall talk again after you have done so. I shan't go round in circles.
So if this is real (chortle), why aren't auto-makers building the technology into their cars? I imagine that any car maker who could offer the benefits being claimed for it would completely take over the market -- so why don't they?
The question becomes, who is the one who is misinformed. People are not stupid, andn they resent being treated so by such as you; they are googling the sources I listed as I type. Those with the skills can build them. Thus further freeing us from dependence on foreign-oli for energy, and buring green-house gases. for our children's future.
stfu...idiot why would a company buy it out it when it would shorten their billionaire pockets most billionaires are intrtwined in in oil industry and energy
thats crap crap crap... doesn't evern make sense... If it were so great, wouldn't a bigger company come up with it? wouldn't a Big company buy his ass out?
Actually, you can produce a large amount of hydrogen using very little electricity By using 2 stainless steel strips in a double helix. By keeping them about 1/8th of an inch apart in a tight spiral it cranks out a massive amount of HHO gas. Look for Double Helix hydrogen on here & you'll see it for yourself.
tanto88: I don't know if you're still listening, but in the compound H2O (water) two hydrogen atoms are bonded to one oxygen atom. this is because hydrogen has a valence of +1 meaning it has one electron and needs to get rid of it (or rarely, gain one more) to form a stable electron shell, and oxygen has a valence of -2, meaning it has 6 electrons, and needs to have 2 more to have a stable shell of 8. so two hydrogen atoms each give one electon to the oxygen atom, and they're all happy.
HHO, as it's written, implies one Hydrogen atom connected to another, connected to an oxygen atom. this make no sense, since a hydrogen atom cannot loose more than one election to have none, or gain only one to have 2. These are the only ways it can bond to another atom (it can't give one electron and then take another, as it would become neutral and not bond)
whether water is a liquid or gas (steam) has no affect on its chemical formula, it's always H2O, otherwise it's not water anymore.
the term HHO it just that, only a term. You get hydrogen and oxygen separately. The gases are really H2 and O2 and 2 H2 combined with one O2 is explosive and can be used as a fuel with the output of WATER.
you're right, it is no longer water. That's merely a term being used to help people understand. If you go out and say "let's use rocketfuel to run our welder/car/etc. it wouldn't sound as attractive."
well, I think the term "HHO" is misleading, and doesn't help anyone to understand, at least not me. still leaves the problem of "perpetual motion machines are impossible" though.
it's not perpetual motion. It uses electricity to generate the gas from water. The water also requires metals to be present which will break down over time and need to be replaced. Finally there's sometimes a catalyst that needs to be added to the water that'll also need added again as you add more water.
What this is, is simply a breakthrough in how we can use the energy that's already here much more effeciently than we are currently. Also the required components are A LOT cheaper to acquire which is what makes this so attractive. Just wait and see, if this takes off, distilled water will skyrocket in price and the metals and catalysts will do the same.
All laboratories can produce H+H+O, but the electrolysis process needs electricity, 80% of the energy in the electricity goes away as heat, 20% is recieved as the chemic energy in hydrogen. An engine driven by the hydrogen can not produce enough energy to drive the process.
IsAnyone reading said ... "They're selling the generator that can make it "on demand." So why aren't they collecting the gas and selling it commercially? Because it's a scam."
That's because Oxyhydrogen cannot safely be stored at useful pressures because of its explosive nature. Relatively low pressures can be achieved, allowing the application to pressurized torches.
Someone mentioned that they think this video was an April Fools prank and that HHO = H20. It doesn't. Look up OxyHydrogen on wikipedia. It's diferent molecule with the same constituent elements.
Oh, now i see why i should've put a smiley or something - so even the retards (the likes of yourself) could spare themselves some energy and refrain from typing shit.
Someone said that everyone whois skeptical is "close minded." I'd say factual.
It takes an enormous amount of energy to break up the hydogen bonds that make water stable. Even if you could do so easily, there's no explanation of how you then make the molecules recombine to form HHO.
If you look at the website, they are NOT selling HHO gas. They're selling the generator that can make it "on demand." So why aren't they collecting the gas and selling it commercially? Because it's a scam.
no you idiot. it's cause the oil companies don't want to let him in. If it's a scam explain how the welder stay so cool to the touch. This can't be simply hydrogen either cause hydrogen is explosive. rearranging Water from H20 to another form is perfectly possible in theory, so maybe he's done it!
What a bunch of skeptics. Yes I think big oil is going to try and buy the patent, or somthing along those lines. But it will happen. With time. Oil tech can only last so long. I think if one of the "big 3" get involved it will happen. They will bring the Tech, and people will buy.
if he ran it on straight water it would rust the engine because it would turn into liquid water before exiting the tailpipe. Hydrogen doesn't burn hot enough to keep itsel from turning to water; however, gasoline does
If this is plausible, it will never see the light of day if Big oil has anything to do about it. Think about what would happen to the world economic market if all the sudden oil was no longer needed. If he does presue it I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly vanished & his findings were to vanish without a trace.
It is patented now, so now the designs and concepts are always going to be available. Can't remove the information from the patent office. People other than him already have the designs.
To those of you who are close minded and pre-judgemental. Being the scientists and engineers that I'm sure most of you are, and before drawing conclusions, did anyone ever think to go to his company's website and look up the information about his product or the concept behind it?
The conclusion: hydrogen as a fuel is not the solution to anyone's problem, except maybe (as was mentioned earlier) the problem of what to do with excess electricity. Which is not a problem our economy struggles with.
BTW the torch he invented is probably everything he says it is. Efficiency isn't an issue for welding torches.
But it gets worse. Running a car on electricity loses only about 3-5% of the electricity to heat caused by friction. Running a car on hydrogen, you lose from 25-40% of the energy locked up in the hydrogen to heat that never gets converted into motion. Add to that the 25% you lost when you converted the electricity to hydrogen in the first place, and you will see that you would have been 2-3 times better off just running your car on electricity than converting it to hydrogen first.
Chemists have been using electricity to pull Hydrogen from water for well over a century. But no one with even the slightest knowledge of economics would do it on a large scale. Why? Because it turns electricity into heat. Electricity is the most refined form of energy in general public use, and the most expensive. Heat is abundant and difficult to convert. It REQUIRES energy to make hydrogen, it doesn't RELEASE energy. Hydrogen is not a "source" of energy, simply a vehicle, like a battery.
this one mentioned that the vehicle was a gas-HHO hybrid, meaning that it still uses gasoline to an extent. however, when he speaks of the low water usages, they must have cut him off before indicating the GAS usage. of course, that would be relative to the vehicle type and all of that, but one must be a bit curious when researching this kind of thing.
research where on the internet??? I don't think you sugggest that as the internet is plagged full of lies to discret water as possible fuel and other things. I once saw a guy posting a threat outraged by michael moore because of his lies on his movie and he posted a page in which for example it claimed that karzai the new president of afganistan never worked at UNICAL a thing that is false as it has been proven.
( http://hytechapps.com ) you will find that the only product currently in production from his own company is the generator that uses electric current from an outlet to perform the electrolytic process. the primary function the Aquygen HHO generator is being promoted for is WELDING because HHO is safer than the acetylene stuff that oxy-fuel welders usually use, and HHO gets very, very hot.
this is not the only renewable energy that will blow your mind. check out those based on zero-point energy. also, the joe cell is another good example of water-derived energy.
another junk science shares scam. Funny to see how easy it is to mislead people with no scientific background. Im surprised they dont claim to use HHO in their antigravity engine too!
That you can burn hydrogen and oxygen and thus get heat and water has been known for over a century. What he is claiming is that he can separate the water into hydrogen and oxygen with less energy than is released when it is burned again. This is ridiculous. It's like getting electricity from turbines in a dam and then using that power to pump water back up into the reservoir. =
No, I'm just pointing out that the theory that this is any kind of solution to our fuel problems is baloney. You're just mad because you have no relevant point to make and don't understand what's going on.
Wow! So Denny Klein is going to join the ranks of people like Steven Horvath in Australia, who sold a lot of stock to losers, Henry Garrett in Texas – in 1935 – and Stanley Meyer, who was convicted of fraud in 1996. Andrija Puharich – who also “discovered” Uri Geller! – Archie Blue, Bob Boyce, Carl Cella, Charles H. Garrett, Daniel Dingel, Hector Pierre Vaes, Nakamatsu Yoshiro, Sam Leslie Leach, Stanley Meyer and many others, eh?
Science slight of hand. the energy needed to break down water into Hyrdrogen and Oxygen, is equivilent to the energy released in burning it. Think of this as energy storage (battery), not creation. This is great way of converting excess electricity into another fuel.
if you put lpg through a welding tip it stays cool as well. and its a brass ball :P
tefisachs 1 year ago
glass ball to glowing liquid metal?
tac0pwnage 2 years ago
SteyrAUG still sucks Hemicuda's cock
slyputz 3 years ago
This guy comes up with a clean solution to our dirty problem and ends up dead. Everybody, thank OPEC for killing this guy off because OPEC is a bunch of greedy, selfish, murdering assholes!
adeckhut 3 years ago
Caveat 'FOX NEWS' is like reading the 'Globe' or the 'national enquirer' for scientific sources.
NO MENTION OF THE AGE OLD ANCIENT FACT THAT ELECTROLYOSIS TO SEPARATE HYDROGEN FROM WATER TAKES AS MUCH ENERGY AS GIVEN BY THE RESULTANT HYDROGEN! Nothing new here, only reinforcement that the idiotic synergy of Fox news and the Bush administration gave us the Iraq War! Fox assumes you are stupid so they can manipulate the public for corporate gain. Problem is they are RIGHT!
NowPleaseReadThis 3 years ago
two words. calcium acetylide
tefisachs 3 years ago
Wow what a wonderful idea. Why has no-one done this before? Imagine - a fuel tank in your car full of WATER! WATER! How wonderful. Think how safe that would be! No risk of gas tank explosion EVER. WOW. Cars will never explode in an accident ever again. WOW. This is so wonderful, so safe and so cheap. Why don't we all use this?
Oh, wait a minute - surely water is so safe because it is already at a low energy state? Don't we need to put at least 1kW INTO it in order to get 1kW energy OUT? hmm
LifesVoyager 3 years ago
The real funny thing is, is that most of the people that post about this must have an IQ of about -2. I am actually getting ready to make an "hho" generator to "hybrid" my '89 Civic. Not sure how he can patent it though as it has been a known process for quite a while.
ethanqueen 3 years ago
The true power here is the stupidity and wallet size of the people who invest in this scamology.
Ragnarokgn 4 years ago
um how could you pump hydrogen into your car. since its flame temperature adjusts to whatever its in contact with, wouldn't you end up melting your engine/????
rewindyourpants 4 years ago
If the government is buying into it and they engineer the system for everyday use, then there economies of scale would make HHO useful otherwise it would be scrapped.
3089280288 4 years ago
I hope everyone realizes this is 100% FAKE. I would love "free" energy like this, but it doesn't exist. If anyone has seen electrolysis occur, it is a very slow process that requires a great deal of energy...more energy than is actually released by the combustion of hydrogen (because energy is lost to the environment, etc). Don't believe everything you see on TV. News anchors don't do much research anymore...they present what sounds good. And seriously, pay attention in chemistry class.
osurlosers 4 years ago
Electrolysis requres nest to no energy. Less than your car radio. Stan Meyer, Carl Cella, and Dingle all built succesful water powered cars, and I know a phycisict here in Philly who built a water powered car; its not that difficult. You are posting your ignorance of the technology. This can free us from dependence on Arab-and Venezuelan OIL.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
I'm betting you've got no formal training in science. The basic laws of energy conservation (thermodynamics) dictate that the energy required to break a molecular bond (ie: turn water in to H2 and oxygen) is the same as the energy released by the formation of such bonds (burning H2 in oxygen to create water). There is simply know way known to conventional science that this fact can be ignored. Once you factor in inefficiencies, this idea is busted!
xjet 4 years ago
I do have a degree in science,and you are not familiar with the may techniqes and technologies.There is also dissciation of the water-molecule with radio-waves,vibrating at resonant-frequency of the water-molecule.The devices and cars are out there, like I said I personnly know someone who modified a car to run on water here in Philadelphia.Just ask around,I am sure even YOU can find the technologies.Carl Cell's water system was printed in NEXUS in 1996;you may access it on line to build it.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
It doesn't matter what technique you use to break the molecular bonds between the hydrogen and oxygen, it's still going to take the same amount of energy as you get during the recombination. If you have discovered a way to defeat the laws of energy conservation and thermodynamics then you are about to become the richest man in the world.
xjet 4 years ago
Why do they always say that?
Anyway its not ABOUT money. That kind of thouth-process has brought us to the terrible-trouble we face today, with Global-Warming out of control, and energy-prices. Our economy is based on CHEAP-energy. Rad about BROWN's GAS, google the aforementioned CARL CELLA, DINGLE, STAN MEYER videos are on youtube, JOE CELL and many other modern marvels. For someone supposedly well-versed in science, you seem ignorant of these methodologies, and others, many on YOUTUBE.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
That's a long list of shysters or sadly misinformed people.
xjet 4 years ago
Build it yourself and decide if it works or not, just as my physicist-friend in Philly has, 11-years ago. Plans are online. That is a challenge, are you afraid of success? And we shall talk again after you have done so. I shan't go round in circles.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
So if this is real (chortle), why aren't auto-makers building the technology into their cars? I imagine that any car maker who could offer the benefits being claimed for it would completely take over the market -- so why don't they?
xjet 4 years ago 2
For your answer, rent the DVD: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR. Watch it over and over.
Let go of your naievete.
(Although things may be changing, with the new TESLA car)
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
because its HHO. do some research
westcoastforever864 3 years ago
The question becomes, who is the one who is misinformed. People are not stupid, andn they resent being treated so by such as you; they are googling the sources I listed as I type. Those with the skills can build them. Thus further freeing us from dependence on foreign-oli for energy, and buring green-house gases. for our children's future.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
hi , you are fake, you don't exist because I say so
ffflyingeagle 4 years ago
well hes basically greedy. this process has been around for many years
westcoastforever864 3 years ago
bought out, by an oil company and then destroyed by the oil company.
coteesh 4 years ago
4 ounces of water lasts 100 miles!!!!!!!! Where can I get one of these? Please!?!
summer10941 4 years ago
stfu...idiot why would a company buy it out it when it would shorten their billionaire pockets most billionaires are intrtwined in in oil industry and energy
Trewstory189B 4 years ago
thats crap crap crap... doesn't evern make sense... If it were so great, wouldn't a bigger company come up with it? wouldn't a Big company buy his ass out?
4s7on777 4 years ago
Bwahahhaaahhahaahahahhahaha!
kokobaboko 4 years ago
Actually, you can produce a large amount of hydrogen using very little electricity By using 2 stainless steel strips in a double helix. By keeping them about 1/8th of an inch apart in a tight spiral it cranks out a massive amount of HHO gas. Look for Double Helix hydrogen on here & you'll see it for yourself.
wingnut4427 4 years ago
h2o=hho
neeeger 4 years ago
whats the diffrent between H2o and HHO? they still contains 2 hydrogens and 1 oxyde as well, isnt it?
tanto88 4 years ago
gas vs. solid!
thomasa1980 4 years ago
the difference between H2O and HHO is that H2O is an actual compound know as water, and HHO is completely fictional.
Pence128 4 years ago
uh... where did you do your chemistry research? Do a little research before posting comments with no basis in reality.
thomasa1980 4 years ago
fine, explain to me how HHO is a compound.
Pence128 4 years ago
tanto88: I don't know if you're still listening, but in the compound H2O (water) two hydrogen atoms are bonded to one oxygen atom. this is because hydrogen has a valence of +1 meaning it has one electron and needs to get rid of it (or rarely, gain one more) to form a stable electron shell, and oxygen has a valence of -2, meaning it has 6 electrons, and needs to have 2 more to have a stable shell of 8. so two hydrogen atoms each give one electon to the oxygen atom, and they're all happy.
Pence128 4 years ago
cont
HHO, as it's written, implies one Hydrogen atom connected to another, connected to an oxygen atom. this make no sense, since a hydrogen atom cannot loose more than one election to have none, or gain only one to have 2. These are the only ways it can bond to another atom (it can't give one electron and then take another, as it would become neutral and not bond)
whether water is a liquid or gas (steam) has no affect on its chemical formula, it's always H2O, otherwise it's not water anymore.
Pence128 4 years ago
the term HHO it just that, only a term. You get hydrogen and oxygen separately. The gases are really H2 and O2 and 2 H2 combined with one O2 is explosive and can be used as a fuel with the output of WATER.
you're right, it is no longer water. That's merely a term being used to help people understand. If you go out and say "let's use rocketfuel to run our welder/car/etc. it wouldn't sound as attractive."
thomasa1980 4 years ago
well, I think the term "HHO" is misleading, and doesn't help anyone to understand, at least not me. still leaves the problem of "perpetual motion machines are impossible" though.
Pence128 4 years ago
it's not perpetual motion. It uses electricity to generate the gas from water. The water also requires metals to be present which will break down over time and need to be replaced. Finally there's sometimes a catalyst that needs to be added to the water that'll also need added again as you add more water.
thomasa1980 4 years ago
What this is, is simply a breakthrough in how we can use the energy that's already here much more effeciently than we are currently. Also the required components are A LOT cheaper to acquire which is what makes this so attractive. Just wait and see, if this takes off, distilled water will skyrocket in price and the metals and catalysts will do the same.
thomasa1980 4 years ago
"its basic chemistry son...
no one understands it"
tanginumin00 4 years ago
All laboratories can produce H+H+O, but the electrolysis process needs electricity, 80% of the energy in the electricity goes away as heat, 20% is recieved as the chemic energy in hydrogen. An engine driven by the hydrogen can not produce enough energy to drive the process.
kjaks 4 years ago
IsAnyone reading said ... "They're selling the generator that can make it "on demand." So why aren't they collecting the gas and selling it commercially? Because it's a scam."
That's because Oxyhydrogen cannot safely be stored at useful pressures because of its explosive nature. Relatively low pressures can be achieved, allowing the application to pressurized torches.
Sovnarkom 4 years ago
Someone mentioned that they think this video was an April Fools prank and that HHO = H20. It doesn't. Look up OxyHydrogen on wikipedia. It's diferent molecule with the same constituent elements.
Sovnarkom 4 years ago
Great video !
Please come to:
overunity dot com/index.php/board,8.0.html
to discuss all overunity hydrogen on demand applications.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 4 years ago
dont sleep on it kids
knightenjr 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ur both bitches and im both ur daddys so both of u bitches stfu
theblackmanOyeah 4 years ago
oh sweet, finally a good reason to melt down the ice caps!
psalmplasma 4 years ago
stupid fuckin idiot lol
just use tap water why use glacier water?
qituvituaq 4 years ago
Oh, now i see why i should've put a smiley or something - so even the retards (the likes of yourself) could spare themselves some energy and refrain from typing shit.
I bet you're feeling exhausted already.
psalmplasma 4 years ago
wasnt a funny joke
u stupid fuckin idiot
qituvituaq 4 years ago
I was almost starting to appreciate your efforts to express yourself in phrases, but now you're boringly redundant.
You're doing it wrong. Cunt.
psalmplasma 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shitty come back
qituvituaq 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sup fag?
psalmplasma 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your moms a fag
qituvituaq 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn son, you're one boring lifeloser.
At least say something funny.
psalmplasma 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your moms funny
son
qituvituaq 4 years ago
This was produced back in the 70s or 80s and that guy didn't get anywhere cause of gas and oil companies! i've seen an older news report.
djedd23 4 years ago
Someone said that everyone whois skeptical is "close minded." I'd say factual.
It takes an enormous amount of energy to break up the hydogen bonds that make water stable. Even if you could do so easily, there's no explanation of how you then make the molecules recombine to form HHO.
If you look at the website, they are NOT selling HHO gas. They're selling the generator that can make it "on demand." So why aren't they collecting the gas and selling it commercially? Because it's a scam.
IsAnyoneReadingThis 4 years ago
no you idiot. it's cause the oil companies don't want to let him in. If it's a scam explain how the welder stay so cool to the touch. This can't be simply hydrogen either cause hydrogen is explosive. rearranging Water from H20 to another form is perfectly possible in theory, so maybe he's done it!
djedd23 4 years ago
What none of you understand is that you cannot have time travel without a flux capacitor.
faiselalisyed 4 years ago
Dr William Rhodes, already did this, make it for free for yourself
cfootball10 4 years ago
What a bunch of skeptics. Yes I think big oil is going to try and buy the patent, or somthing along those lines. But it will happen. With time. Oil tech can only last so long. I think if one of the "big 3" get involved it will happen. They will bring the Tech, and people will buy.
singleblankscreen 5 years ago
shut up you fags
dingy 5 years ago
He claims the car goes a hundred miles on 4 ounces of water, but he 'chooses' to run it as a gas/water hybrid.
Yeah, right.
I wish it were real, but it smells of something other than water.
Oruboris 5 years ago
if he ran it on straight water it would rust the engine because it would turn into liquid water before exiting the tailpipe. Hydrogen doesn't burn hot enough to keep itsel from turning to water; however, gasoline does
h20Enthusiast 4 years ago
If this is plausible, it will never see the light of day if Big oil has anything to do about it. Think about what would happen to the world economic market if all the sudden oil was no longer needed. If he does presue it I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly vanished & his findings were to vanish without a trace.
wingnut4427 5 years ago
It is patented now, so now the designs and concepts are always going to be available. Can't remove the information from the patent office. People other than him already have the designs.
imaseraph 4 years ago
To those of you who are close minded and pre-judgemental. Being the scientists and engineers that I'm sure most of you are, and before drawing conclusions, did anyone ever think to go to his company's website and look up the information about his product or the concept behind it?
killawhattt 5 years ago
what a crock of shit... he just uses a freakin fuel cell, he didnt develop any new tech >_> <_<
lumpkinsismyhero 5 years ago
Does no-one realise that this was an April Fools joke?! HHO...whats that....oh yeah, H20.
KillerFridge 5 years ago
The conclusion: hydrogen as a fuel is not the solution to anyone's problem, except maybe (as was mentioned earlier) the problem of what to do with excess electricity. Which is not a problem our economy struggles with.
BTW the torch he invented is probably everything he says it is. Efficiency isn't an issue for welding torches.
madmardy 5 years ago
But it gets worse. Running a car on electricity loses only about 3-5% of the electricity to heat caused by friction. Running a car on hydrogen, you lose from 25-40% of the energy locked up in the hydrogen to heat that never gets converted into motion. Add to that the 25% you lost when you converted the electricity to hydrogen in the first place, and you will see that you would have been 2-3 times better off just running your car on electricity than converting it to hydrogen first.
madmardy 5 years ago
Chemists have been using electricity to pull Hydrogen from water for well over a century. But no one with even the slightest knowledge of economics would do it on a large scale. Why? Because it turns electricity into heat. Electricity is the most refined form of energy in general public use, and the most expensive. Heat is abundant and difficult to convert. It REQUIRES energy to make hydrogen, it doesn't RELEASE energy. Hydrogen is not a "source" of energy, simply a vehicle, like a battery.
madmardy 5 years ago
interesting... please those fags who dont get anythings and are brainwashed dont comment
tehdreamer 5 years ago
this one mentioned that the vehicle was a gas-HHO hybrid, meaning that it still uses gasoline to an extent. however, when he speaks of the low water usages, they must have cut him off before indicating the GAS usage. of course, that would be relative to the vehicle type and all of that, but one must be a bit curious when researching this kind of thing.
blueddha 5 years ago
research where on the internet??? I don't think you sugggest that as the internet is plagged full of lies to discret water as possible fuel and other things. I once saw a guy posting a threat outraged by michael moore because of his lies on his movie and he posted a page in which for example it claimed that karzai the new president of afganistan never worked at UNICAL a thing that is false as it has been proven.
peruanoscrew 5 years ago
( http://hytechapps.com ) you will find that the only product currently in production from his own company is the generator that uses electric current from an outlet to perform the electrolytic process. the primary function the Aquygen HHO generator is being promoted for is WELDING because HHO is safer than the acetylene stuff that oxy-fuel welders usually use, and HHO gets very, very hot.
blueddha 5 years ago
No. HHO hybrid is electric engine + water engine.
starlandliu 5 years ago
this is not the only renewable energy that will blow your mind. check out those based on zero-point energy. also, the joe cell is another good example of water-derived energy.
blueddha 5 years ago
Too many people too hopeless to think about alternate energy sources rather than the steadily decreasing oil fuels.
Yggdrasill4 5 years ago
Holy heaven.... that's something else...thnkz for sending me this...
interwhip 5 years ago
cool,..
jimmyq888 5 years ago
another junk science shares scam. Funny to see how easy it is to mislead people with no scientific background. Im surprised they dont claim to use HHO in their antigravity engine too!
Proteios 5 years ago
yeah i guess that was stupid to type but u know ?
dingy 5 years ago
" only problem is what if we dont have enough water"
There is a logic here. ^^
Goatmon 5 years ago
Either fraud or hoax. The gullibility of the news media amazes me at times.
Maxdwolf 5 years ago
um its not fake why do you think theres water dripping from the flame ? because its powered by water.
dingy 5 years ago
That you can burn hydrogen and oxygen and thus get heat and water has been known for over a century. What he is claiming is that he can separate the water into hydrogen and oxygen with less energy than is released when it is burned again. This is ridiculous. It's like getting electricity from turbines in a dam and then using that power to pump water back up into the reservoir. =
Maxdwolf 5 years ago
shut the hell up
crimsonGibson 5 years ago
cant you see the flame turing back into water when he making it go against that board or whatever geeze...
dingy 5 years ago
your just mad cuz you didnt think of it
crimsonGibson 5 years ago
No, I'm just pointing out that the theory that this is any kind of solution to our fuel problems is baloney. You're just mad because you have no relevant point to make and don't understand what's going on.
Maxdwolf 5 years ago
only problem is what if we dont have enough water
dingy 5 years ago
omg 70% of the earth is water
swenus 5 years ago
70% of the earth is water. idiot. its called oceans.
crimsonGibson 5 years ago
that is crazy
dingy 5 years ago
Wow! So Denny Klein is going to join the ranks of people like Steven Horvath in Australia, who sold a lot of stock to losers, Henry Garrett in Texas – in 1935 – and Stanley Meyer, who was convicted of fraud in 1996. Andrija Puharich – who also “discovered” Uri Geller! – Archie Blue, Bob Boyce, Carl Cella, Charles H. Garrett, Daniel Dingel, Hector Pierre Vaes, Nakamatsu Yoshiro, Sam Leslie Leach, Stanley Meyer and many others, eh?
econalc 5 years ago
shut up
crimsonGibson 5 years ago
Science slight of hand. the energy needed to break down water into Hyrdrogen and Oxygen, is equivilent to the energy released in burning it. Think of this as energy storage (battery), not creation. This is great way of converting excess electricity into another fuel.
zoyx 5 years ago