Added: 4 years ago
From: KlyeJ
Views: 1,218
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No evolution should have already been rewritten, but the atheists have been protecting it politically. Now that science is cheap and available to all, the hidden facts are being uncovered 1 by 1 and it will only get worse. Until Evolutionists will be the laughing stock in world history. Like the flat earthers. Mark my words. Think about their science. Let's take extinction. How is it possible to claim empirically something is extinct when A large part of the planet is unexplored? Truth my butt

  • trying to discredit evolution is not the same as trying to discredit science...... Creationists have no problem with science, just evolution.

  • @StarSedition Evolution is one of the most rigorously contested and inspected scientific theories.

  • @LDNLeon ok i'll bite what is the theory of the evolution exactly? every scientific theory has a specific published terminology set down to detail the idea. doesn't seem like evolution has that, seems like its definition changes with every scientists agenda. thats why theres so much inquiry on it, because theres no unification of minds on what exactly evolution is and how it works. or am i to go back to the origin of species written in mid 1800s. u know, a time before we knew anything...

  • Comment removed

  • That guy is trying to dicredit science by telling us that it has made progress, as if science as a method is wrong just because it's refined over time.

    Just be glad science *is* what it is. If science was founded on the same principles as religion there would be no room for refinement.

  • @Gameboygenius science was started by religion 

  • @billynunns It is true that universities and other institutions were once sponsored by the Catholic Church. However, that has absolutely nothing to do with whether religious dogma holds water.

  • talk about blatant dishonesty. "Why do they rewrite the entire story of evolution every time they discover something?" Are you serious? Can you not discern the difference between building on prior knowledge and a complete rewrite?

  • Only a fool makes a scientific argument based on an article in Time magazine. Anybody with an undergrad degree knows that.

  • When it comes to evolution and creation, Dr. Charles Jackson has one piece of advice: "Follow the advice of The Matrix and free your mind."

    Jackson, who has a doctorate in science education from University of Virginia, has used logic to give theologians and creationists "an intellectual leg to stand on." ``From His Website...Awesome truth

  • Science education?

    That clears things up.

  • I do not see how this is any kind of proof for creation myths. Am I wrong but in the last slide didn't it refer to natural selection being used as a way of illustrating a point. I am not a scientist but I think I know that natural selection refers to Evolution!

  • At 3:40 this guy reveals exactly how much this guy lacks any and all objectivity. He basically says "we are able to see truth because god is on our side". I also love how you can boil down his entire argument from the magazine article into an "argument from personal incredulity" fallacy. Get to those kids as early as can. Tell them to think of all their teachers as liars if you must.

  • "Chimp DNA looks like human DNA because we look physically similar"

    Of course we look similar, its because we have a common ancestor.

    The "genetic clock" is set at a roughly steady rate because of mathematical probability, no mater how large the population of a species the likelihood of a mutation being inherited is the same.

    The challenges to existing scientific theories are being made by scientists, this is how science works and improves our understanding over time.

  • The challenges to science are not being made by creationists they are being made by scientists which leads to better science.

    This fool also makes the error of assuming that if a part of a scientific technique is changed it must mean that evolution is false and that God did it.

  • @DefaultPosition

    That's false because in the diagram that shows evolution from animal to man there is an "ancestor" that apparently evolved the wrong way. It's the truth

  • Scientists need to swallow their pride and get back to being scientific. Why such a strong desire for Darwin to be correct?

  • It's called "irrefutable evidence", which the person in this video rejects.

    He is lying to the audience. This is an example of how religion can cause people to behave immorally.

    These people are putting the scientific future of your country at stake. I'm European, I have little to loose from the undermining of your country's scientific industries by religious lunatics.

    He's reading stuff from newspapers, why isn't he referencing scientific papers?

  • this is satire, right?

    myspace dot com /roiscience

  • Nope.

  • i was there!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more