if you want to keep your neck never do business with the usa. if they insist, then i guess letting them come in and borrow a few acres to grow poppies to then ship back the final product may leave you unscathed. but for how long?
@Re5Publica you moron he wasn't secretary of state (and never was for ANY administration). He was running a pharmaceutical company at the time & went to iraq as special middle east envoy for the reagan administration who was trying to make nice with their new "buddy" saddam, when they found out saddam was chemical weapons, they took him of terrorist's list and resumed normal relations with him and started supporting him like crazy. Who better to send than a hypocritical hatchet man like rumsfeld
@sniffy45 Rumsfeld as middle east envoy 25 + years ago meeting with a middle east leader who was at war with our enemy Iran, shady . I prefer the sex photos of Kim Jong il and Sec of State Madeline Albright in 2000 Clinton Administration . Speak softly and carry a big ass while giving head to sworn enemies as they nut in our face.
If there ever any doubt about the so called American democracy and freedom, this video makes that very clear. America was never about freedom or democracy, you wonder why the murder rate is so high in America. Pretty sad. This video is the TRUTH.
Damn, never trust a white man. Anyway Native American will tell you that. I will never trust anyone who is white. They are very manipulative, that is why they love to murder their relative for insurance money. They will smile at you and stab you in the back when you're not looking.
so what alliances switch all the time. Saddam was never a hard-core ally anyway. We just Iran that country that shouts "death to America" (iran). To be in checked
cont- so dsaddaam uses chemical weapons SOLD TO HIM BY AMERIKKKA on iran correct? He attacks Iran with U.S. tanks and guns correct? His war for Iran is in large part funded by the u.s. taxpayer(wage slave idiot) correct? and for the entire 8 year war with iraan the cia funnels him billions in arms and cash correct? ALl the while knowing he was psychopath correct? SO when and why did saddaam hussein suddenly become a "threat" and an enemy? lol! Oh yeah when he stopped taking orders from D.C.
let me get this straight.Donald rumsfeld meets and greets and with ALLY sadaam hussein in 1983. At this time saddaam husseing was a CERTIFIED DESPOT who had already slaughtered thousands of kurds. YEt rumsfield meets with saddaam hussein and confirms a PARTNERSHI{P. Then the U.S. criminal govt loots its working class to finance saddam's regime and arm him with weapons including chemical and bio-weapons. then the u.s. sanctions his unprovoked attack on Iran, in which he uses those chemicals
Well Saddam was bad because he did not understand the plan of American. American can not be friend to any one with out any reason . Wakup arabs and stop bycot amerca
they were there to sell him weapons during that time it was OK to kill kurds?like the us gov didn know about it! then in gulf war,Y they didn take him down?he was weak! all politicians are criminals! people pay for it! im an iraqi, i luv all iraqis i feel sad that they keep dying! i don blame americans, blame ALL politicians every where who decide whats better for their ppl whithout caring about what they need... look at all the voilence every where! who is the victim?peace
This is Rumsfeld under Bush1 meeting with Saddam to make the deal for the bio weapons to be used on Iran. They were later used on the citizens in northern Iraq.(see Kurds Bio). This is where Saddam's bio weapons came from. Saddam couldn't make his own bio(or WMD). We take thugs and prop them up with money and weapons and then tear them down if they don't go along. Same with Noriega, Osama bin Laden, Pinochet, etc. It's NOT any specific political party, it's just how we do business in general.
Oh absolutely, the American government made that killing possible. Remember, the cowards in power don't represent the citizens. The people of America condemn the actions of the genocidal politicians who made the murders possible. People want the same thing all over the world. It's the coward politicians that do the evil. The Kurds are citizens inside Iraq. That doesn't mean the Kurds agreed with the leader of Iraq.
Thanks! I just won a bet because of you! I made a bet that the first person to not get it would be a coward. I was right! Stop being such a victim. It's about a war that Bush WANTED to happen, not an old one. Stop looking like an idiot all the time. Try reading the discussion instead of staring at your dog's ass all day.
They met before Saddam committed his mega-terrible genocide on the kurds! Rumsfeld and legendary actor Charlton Heston went to the same high school (a few years apart)! Check out great bios like By His Own Rules and Charlton Heston: An Incredible LIfe: Revised Edition (both at amazon)!
YAY the good ol days when IRAQ and US were gaining up on Iranian petroleum reserves. I love modern industry, wars are fought to make cash, there no such thing as winning or loosing anymore, its just about how long armed conflict goes on, The longer the better apparently.
It is amazing that despite these videos, there are people out there that refuse to believe that Reagan and Saddam were allies in the 1980s. Case in point: Skye820. This "woman" on youtube actually thinks that Reagan and Saddam had nothing to do with each other and were actually enemies. Do a search on youtube and find her name and see of her foolish rantings. Better yet, search this youtube cliip and post your comments: "West Chester Victory Rally Silent Night" Remind Skye of Reagan's friends!
See, WE gave Saddam the chemical weapons that he used on the Kurds. Thumbs up to the dictator when he's useful to us and thumbs down when we're done with him. THERE ARE CLIPS ON HERE OF RUMSFELD DECRYING SADDAM'S USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS. UMMM, WHY DID YOU GIVE HIM THE WEAPONS IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Congress had very little to do with the dealings. Most of Iran's and Iraq's weapon deal deals went on behind closed doors. Plus I'm not saying the dems are any better.
source plz? im not saying youre wrong, i just want to see the evidence that congress was not involved. especially the senate intelligence committee and the senate armed services committee and others.
all of em were involved, as well as members of the british government and french government, this whole war on terror is bigger than iraq, its bigger then 9/11, mark my words, in year 2010 the economy will go into the 2nd depression and americans will die of fright, and the government will push their new laws and Amero currency on us telling us its the only way, we must ressist it. and troops will be brought home and ordered to kill those who rise up against the Gov. the weak will accept it.
err... really? i have not met very many soldiers who would fire on their fellow citizens. they swear an oath to the constitution, not to any particular person in government.
dont be such a fool, it was soilders who fired on black walstreet killing off the independant rich black man who ran that town, and they bombed that shit to the ground all becuz of the color of therir skin. and lets not forget they killed off the panthers. belive me they will fire if they are conviced that there own citizens are a threat. and the Government wil spue there propaganda to make the true paitriots and rebels fighting for the revolution in 2010 look like terrorist. they did it to MLK
sorry, but my grandmother lived in tulsa in 1921, and it was the ordinary white citizens (her neighbors) that burned down black wall street. the military was not required.
MLK could not be made to look like a terrorist, because he was committed to non violence. that is why he has a holiday named after him.
u missed my point completely. the point was that black walstreet was burned to the grown while police and us troops didnt do a damn thing about it. wildfires burn down a bunch of rich peoples homes out west and bush shows up in cali talking about his plan to help them. why didnt he do the same in katrina? MLK was called a terrorist by the amerikkkan government, and the CIA and FBI were tapping his phone lines and correta scotts phone lines up until her very death. i kno evil when i see it.
Hes referring to "Inactive Coercion", inactive coercion is illegal in public international law. An unproven example of this would be if the United States was aware of a imminent attack on Pearl Harbor, and had sufficient time and resources to intercept the Japanese fleet but choose not too, for one reason or another. Government and state institutions commonly maintain plausible deniability, which makes oversight nearly impossible, which itself invalidates democracy.
well, then im asking, which groups and individuals were 'in on it' and which werent? where is the evidence? because saying 'republicans' did it, includes a very large number of people. my dad is republican. do you mean to say he sold weapons to saddam? are you saying democrats were not invovled?
Political parties follow state spending, in this regard, they are influenced by peoples job security, because of the vast amounts of people employed by private defense industry, the people who choose military coercion are primarily those who are in control of the majority of defense employers. This is known as a "Permanent Arms Economy" ie. a semi-command-type economy which is directed by corporation executives, based on military industry, and funded by state social spending.
During the period of time in which this video was filmed, all unclassified military actions were done legally, including arms export to the Iraq government for use against Iran. The question is whether war corporatism should be illegal, since it involves lower middle class manpower.
The real victim here was the Iranian and Iraqi people. i believe Iran was defeating saddam back then when US Navy and Airforce assisted saddam by attacking Iranian ships in the Gulf and then giving saddam chemical weapons helping him mass murder as many iranians and iraqis as possible..and then we ask: "why they hate us..?"
@mattz2122 Iraq bought those chemical weapons off America cuz in 1982 Saddam was making an atomic bomb and was seconds away from success but then Israel bombed that nuclear power facility and donated 1,000,000 keys to Iran,and Iran's main tactic against Iraq was that they forced THOUSANDS of Iranian civilians to charge at the Iraqi forces to lower Iraqi ammunition,and as an American General once said,"Iran was lucky the war ended"(saddam was going to drop 900 pounds of biological WMD on Iran
@mattz2122 The U.S. never gave Iraq chemical weapons. Despite that fact, every amateur anti-american, socialist or islamist propagandist never fails in saying that they did.
So far, you have 27 thumbs up, which means that many people are as ignorant as you. That's enough to start a club; you could discuss non-facts and prejudiced assertions regularly.
hey you, faggot inbred, the U.S. DID IN FACT supply Saddam with chemical weapons aside from strategic and tactical information in fighting Iran during the Iran-Iraq War. Even YOUR own right wing supporters such Rumsfeld, Bolton, and Cheney admit it. Are you going to call them socialist?
@madmaxninja08 The U.S. did not supply Saddam Hussein with a single chemical weapon, in fact, they barred pesticide shipments to Iraq in 1984, saying that they could be weaponized. Rumsfeld, or Cheney would never admit to giving chemical weapons to anyone, because they never did, let alone to Iraq. You are lying, or have been deceived. I believe you're the victim of a lie repeated so often that you come to believe it. You were probably more susceptible because you're prejudiced to begin with.
You obviously are a son of a whore. Saddam received chemicals which were in near weaponized form. All Saddam did was assemble and refine it. Saddam also received Bell helicopters with the purpose of spreading the gas. Read a history book moron instead of being a faggot.
@madmaxninja08 Now you're changing your story.. first they were chemical weapons, now they're what? ".. chemicals which in near weaponized form"? What the hell does that mean, can you explain it to us?
You were mistaken, and deceived, and it doesn't matter how many times you call me "faggot", or "son of a whore", it won't hurt my feelings or make your statement true, so I don't know why you bother.
The real victim here was the Iranian and Iraqi people. i believe Iran was defeating saddam back then when US Navy and Airforce assisted saddam by attacking Iranian ships in the Gulf and then giving saddam chemical weapons helping him mass murder as many iranians and iraqis as possible..and then we ask: "why they hate us..?"
Got any links to sources of anybody credible positing such theories? Capitalist Nationalist's who hate world democracy like Alex Jones hopefully won't be included.
reminds me 2pac intro of the song called " GHOST " said in a slowed down voice : " U MuthaFuck'z Can't Stop Me.... Even If I die I'm gon' be a fuckin' problem...Do you Believe In GHOSTS MuthaFucka....Real live black... ghosts
I do know how he looked like, have been seeing footage from him for the past 20 years. And whats with the English dude? what tense are you trying to write it?
It's funny, this cover of the Weekly Standard (the neo-con magazine) tries the same tatic, if only we could have done something like that we wouldn't be stuck in this god-forsaken war.
Since there was no sound back in the 80's I'll supply the dialog:
" Hi Mr Saddam, Im whitey, this is Whitey#2 and this is whitey #3."
"As you can see on the menu, these are all the chemical and biologial weapons we are prepared to give you. no, sorry, no nukes..those are for white people only. anyways we wont tell you what to do, but we wont raise a stink at the UN if you use them on Iran."
"How are you set for $? We can also help you smuggle drugs for $. We help the Contras with Coke and Osama with his wacky poppy, do you know him? great guy, lil crazy but we give him weapons anyways...no,no,its ok,they really only destroy black ghettos so we don't mind, really.
loke at this bull and u know the other 4 letter word i hope, well it "shit" bullshit.. hussein abuse his freaking power and that effing yes eeeffing that is ffff means fuckin ...that rumsfeld knew all along. they had it all map out.
This was snake-oil salesman Rumsfeld agreeing the deal on nerve gas and weapons for American government business. Saddam used it on the Kurds in 1982/3 when they followed Bush Snr's advice to rise up. The US did nothing, cause it was their gas! WAKE UP AMERICA - THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN CHEESEBURGERS & OPRAH.
American Leaders, Not American Citizens. Make sure that you say it correctly. The majority of Americans didn't even vote for Bush in his first election. Bush stole that election. The deciding vote for the Bush campaign came from a state where his brother was the governor. They just threw out the votes of Thousands and thousands of black people. And most black people didn't vote for this Bush. So get it right my friend.
yes probably bush stoled eletions, but that is how your electoral sistem works,in italy we say that the parlament, is the mirrow where a population watches itself, so i think we can agree that if kerry won, your image wouldent probably be mutch better, its time for our american friends to wake up and try to do something, insted of weening about theyr presidnt's mistakes. in europe we are still waiting for you so, GET IT RIGTH, and start more costructive tougth's.
I agree with your statement on Kerry being just as bad as Bush. But in a country where votes are thrown out and represented by the electoral college it will be tough. I don't know how well you know our electoral system but our electoral representatives do not have to vote the same way as those whom they represent.
i'm not critcizing eatch single american citizen, but just the mass of americans that seem's to be blind about the suferrence they create in the world.
that is a problem of all democratic countryes, but the problem is not political, it is a cultural problem, you see if in europe a president of a state said that hanging a man to a rope was a "great act of democracy" his state would be immediatly kiked out from the union, and people would be rioting in the streets.
I agree. This country is inherently evil it basically exterminated a race to exist. It enslaved a people to build it and help it grow economically. And finally it has a long history of killing heads of state and some of their citizens to impose it's "democracy" on other countries. I like living here but I don't like being a part of a country who is guilty of such things.
you have a good head on your shoulders. the usa(CIA) was also behind the 02 attempted coup on hugo chavez, everyone should watch "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" on youtube. CIA snipers took out atleast a douzen civilians and attempted to blame it on chavez in order to sway public opinion.
If the majority of voters are for slavery should we have slavery? A representative republic does not allow for "mob rule" but does allow for representatives to be removed from office if they don't represent.
What are you talking about? Do you even know? The electoral college representatives aren't in an office. So they cannot be removed from office. The answer to your first question is if it is fairly voted for then yes. Ethical matters such as should we have slavery do not matter. If something is voted for and passed into law then it is the LAW!
Take a look at the percentages that Clinton won with. They are nowhere close to 50%. And, just so you know, the legal ballots allowed to be counted were counted over and over for years and Bush wins everytime. MoveOn.Jackass
I don't even have to respond to this, but check out a post that I posted a couple of days before you wrote this response. It is sufficient to serve as my reply, as proven by you getting upset and calling me out of my name. "In other words it wasn't that white people didn't like Clinton becuase of what he did with Monica Lewinski. It was because he was the first "black president". Watch the enraged responses that follow they will prove me right."
Those that want diplomacy bitch...even tho here it is (20 years before we attacked the country and countless UN resolutions - Freaking joke btw.). So what would you rather us do? I know, we can just die so they wont have anything to hate us about...oh except the fact they couldnt kill us themselves. Wake the fuck up everyone - what is it going to take?
i would love to send bush in iraq without any security and understand what he did,to show him that freedom has another meaning ,where is the freedom that he promised ??bush is the same league of saddam but the world hasn't relised yet??,it's all about money...and the poors always pay the most alway!
The week democrats under the leadership of the even weaker Nancy P. are scared to try to impeach the president even though he lied to congress to start the war. The craziest thing is the Bush family is making a lot of money off of this war. "The only way for congress to keep America safe is for congress to FULLY FUND the war in Iraq and on terror.", Bush says. I declare that Bush Sr. is the spokesperson for a major supplier of weapons.
TRUEASIATIKTRIBE> Are you really as dumb as you try to be? The voiolence against US troops have been a small part of the shit in Iraq. Nowdays the terrorists are aiming on people of other religion or the Iraqi government soldiers.
US Troops should leave Iraq..so the violence will stop.The killing and violence will not stop till there are US troops there! F*ck Donald Duck Rumsfeld!
Before any more uneducated commentary is placed here, note this was over twenty years ago, during the Reagan admin. when Hussein claimed his gov't was 'allied' with the U.S.- at the same time 'accidently' firing a guided missle at the U.S.S. Stark... wake up!@
that is vary sad of you to say.. i think mabye it is better if nobody gets hanged from a rope, middle age ha sbeen passed from a while... look's like like not evrybody got that. remember: barbarism will bring only other violence, now is in iraq tomorrow it could reech your pretty litlle houses so be careful and think a little bit more before posting this kind of hateful comments
its not hateful msg. its something which tells u the truth about so called Bush Regime. The love oil. The will allow the hanging in 3rd world countries. Just how new UN secretary general & puppet of america said in his opening speech. "Deciding how to carry out capital punishment is bussiness of individual govt's!"
oh my god im so tired of people saying the hanging was wrong and shouldnt have been done yeah well the idiots who say that should look at some of the shit hes done then get back to me!
So what about "some of the shit" bush and blair do on a daily basis. History is littered with "shit" events perpetrated by lunatic politicians in the name of democracy/imperialism/capitalism. Take your pick. How does one madman judge another madman? What our so called leaders do is OK though. Wake up! Fuck em all!!!
i think that revange only breang's to new hate and hate only breangs new violence, in civil countrys we got that from something like 200 year's ( in the dukedom of florence it was abolished in 1786 by peter lepold), but mabye americans need a little more time
to get that, probably it is not theyr fault,mabye it is only because they are deeply uneducated.
yes i know very well what are crimes of saddam, but, no, i dont think that revenge is a politic solution, the victims of dictature will njot raise from the world of death's now that he has been hanged, and now saddam became a martyr of the sunnis world,
And don't you realize I'm speaking from the viewpoint of less of a citizen of a country, and more as a native of EARTH, or TERRA, or whatever you wanna call this place?
And the average singaporean citizen is more well informed than an average american citizen. Look at our education system, our students are STEEPED in General Paper material.
It takes a TRUE citizen to admit that one's country has its faults, and therefore CAN be improved. You, Root4x, are too caught up in your silly little image of the American Dream to realize that.
. Does it prick at your pride to hear me talk about your leader like that? Well, free speech is a key part of the constitution of the US of A, isn't it? Or should it be "Practiced with discretion" like they put it SO delicately in my homeland? Oh my, is the US turning into the USSR?
And roots4x? From message boards and the immense amount of stuff that is on the net that comes from the US... I'd say that your culture is disseminating at a VERY fast rate. So, if you knew to check my profile, I live in singapore. While our govt isn't completely democratic, and also not super on the human rights side. I am NOT the govt. Apparently you have not the discerning skills to make the distinction. Noticed I actually DID? Look at my previous posts
You are a fool. I'm not just speaking for the USA. I'm speaking for humanity itself. Can you not understand that the world DOES NOT revolve around the USA? And please, your country is SO vibrant and SO democratic and since democracy is SO about free-flow of info... I know more than enough.
And, please, as I said, accept other people's views for a CHANGE. It would benefit your country if y'all got CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM.
Roots4x sorry - I can't stand behind the likes of the Idiot Bush and his cronies in crime. He is allowing this country to be flushed down the toilet for a buck to his friends. I love America that's why we should impeach Bush. He's a moronic coke snorting drunkard fool.
Bush's policies favor the wealthy. The republican party's government has also taken away valuable financial aid assistance to us college students and permenantly raised the interest rates on student loans. Which hurts those who make the least the most. Guess who that is . . ., According to the 2003 Census the avg income for whites was $46,900, and for blacks $29,026 which was also a 3 percent decline. Poverty for whites is 8 percent and blacks 24.1 percent.
In other words it wasn't that white people didn't like Clinton becuase of what he did with Monica Lewinski. It was because he was the first "black president". Watch the enraged responses that follow they will prove me right.
I'm an United States Citizen and Enasberg you are right the citizens of the United States not being the boss of the United States. If we were then Bush wouldn't have been president in the first place. Secondly the white people in the U.S. felt that Clinton was such a bad president because his policies helped minorities and them. They didn't like having a president that was well received by black people.
Terrorists are lucky the United States is as nice as it is. Suspected terrorists are held at Guantánamo Bay and then released a year later??? They are lucky the United States doesn't play the way the Nazis did. (i.e. kill EVERYONE)
You're a fucking moron. David Hick's has been held for 5 years with no trial. No convictions. Now they aren't even allowed to see lawyers in Guantanamo bay because a few peolpe killed themselves. The United States is an imperialist fascist nation
Them Americans so stupid they believe everything their government tells them and their control the media so it's all fake up their, and the problem is
they Really believe their right, question..? where were the mass destruction tools..? hmm okay another one who the fuck are these judges lawyers in his courd not iraq's thats for sure.. maybe some imigrates from america?..hmmm
How does the Kyoto Protocol have anything to do with the Geneva Conventions? And Koriolis, while the US may not be the most humanitarian country, we are by far not the worst. I wonder what country you are from. Are your country's hands so clean?
While few educated people in the US deny that Bush may not be the most capable president, we still stand by our leader. To a certain point, we must stand by our elected officials. We can't be babies and whine about how they're not doing what we want them to do. Koriolis, you don't live here, and you only know about this country from what you hear in the news and message boards. Educate yourself a little bit.
roots4x, you could not be more wrong. We never HAVE to stand by our leaders. They serve us. We do not serve them. Also, people "whining" about their leaders is a little thing called democracy. We elected them, so I think we should be allowed to criticize them when they don't do people, who they work for, want them to do.
This has been flagged as spam show
if you want to keep your neck never do business with the usa. if they insist, then i guess letting them come in and borrow a few acres to grow poppies to then ship back the final product may leave you unscathed. but for how long?
jbrah69 3 months ago
They look so good together.
1RadicalDreamer 8 months ago
Comment removed
Re5Publica 11 months ago
@Re5Publica you moron he wasn't secretary of state (and never was for ANY administration). He was running a pharmaceutical company at the time & went to iraq as special middle east envoy for the reagan administration who was trying to make nice with their new "buddy" saddam, when they found out saddam was chemical weapons, they took him of terrorist's list and resumed normal relations with him and started supporting him like crazy. Who better to send than a hypocritical hatchet man like rumsfeld
bigbossman999 10 months ago
Nice... but I prefer video of Madeline Albright giving Kim jong il a blowjob. Nothing pleases him like a desperate fatty who gives without receiving.
6AIpha6Beta6 1 year ago
WHAT? They both went to Harvard.
davitodude 1 year ago
When is our butcher, Donald Rumsfeld going to be put on trial for his extensive crimes against humanity?
54683NS 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like Saddam and Satan form Southpark???
hopala007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like Saddam and Satan from Southpark???
hopala007 1 year ago
Comment removed
hopala007 1 year ago
The camera doesn't lie.
DianeDi 1 year ago
"I heard you gassed the Kurds last week..."
"Yes, Yes..."
"So the gas we sold you worked?"
"Yes, yes..."
That IS history. Look it up. It's there in the books.
newton2013 1 year ago 7
@newton2013
Yes, Rumsfeld called it the "Kurdish Uprising."
mbandrews1 1 year ago
democracy? freedoom? israel? human rights? hahahaha, only fucking shits for ignorants! xDDD
corderitodedios69 1 year ago 2
Ahhh, you gotta love the Cold War era.
Breakerchase 1 year ago
The US rocks. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer...
Corkielena 1 year ago
@Corkielena Iraq wasn't the enemy back then. And this isn't the Godfather.
Sconi71 1 year ago
saddam was a great man
max9450681 1 year ago
lying sneaky snake like cocksucker = rumsfeld
sniffy45 1 year ago
@sniffy45 Rumsfeld as middle east envoy 25 + years ago meeting with a middle east leader who was at war with our enemy Iran, shady . I prefer the sex photos of Kim Jong il and Sec of State Madeline Albright in 2000 Clinton Administration . Speak softly and carry a big ass while giving head to sworn enemies as they nut in our face.
St984 1 year ago 2
If there ever any doubt about the so called American democracy and freedom, this video makes that very clear. America was never about freedom or democracy, you wonder why the murder rate is so high in America. Pretty sad. This video is the TRUTH.
shootthedevil 1 year ago
Damn, never trust a white man. Anyway Native American will tell you that. I will never trust anyone who is white. They are very manipulative, that is why they love to murder their relative for insurance money. They will smile at you and stab you in the back when you're not looking.
shootthedevil 1 year ago
so what alliances switch all the time. Saddam was never a hard-core ally anyway. We just Iran that country that shouts "death to America" (iran). To be in checked
dadecountyhustler305 1 year ago
See you in hell Rumsfeld you American piece of shit.
pizzlemj 1 year ago
i remember this LOL
thanks y!a
amazondotcombuyer 1 year ago
why is this a big deal lol? chamberlain met with hitler before ww2. Iran was our enemy at this time and Rumsfeld was ambasaddor to the middle east.
St984 1 year ago
cont- so dsaddaam uses chemical weapons SOLD TO HIM BY AMERIKKKA on iran correct? He attacks Iran with U.S. tanks and guns correct? His war for Iran is in large part funded by the u.s. taxpayer(wage slave idiot) correct? and for the entire 8 year war with iraan the cia funnels him billions in arms and cash correct? ALl the while knowing he was psychopath correct? SO when and why did saddaam hussein suddenly become a "threat" and an enemy? lol! Oh yeah when he stopped taking orders from D.C.
Godgenes 2 years ago 2
let me get this straight.Donald rumsfeld meets and greets and with ALLY sadaam hussein in 1983. At this time saddaam husseing was a CERTIFIED DESPOT who had already slaughtered thousands of kurds. YEt rumsfield meets with saddaam hussein and confirms a PARTNERSHI{P. Then the U.S. criminal govt loots its working class to finance saddam's regime and arm him with weapons including chemical and bio-weapons. then the u.s. sanctions his unprovoked attack on Iran, in which he uses those chemicals
Godgenes 2 years ago
Rumsfeld the 2-Faced treacherous jew !!!
N17ist 2 years ago
Well Saddam was bad because he did not understand the plan of American. American can not be friend to any one with out any reason . Wakup arabs and stop bycot amerca
Ayisha49 2 years ago
they were there to sell him weapons during that time it was OK to kill kurds?like the us gov didn know about it! then in gulf war,Y they didn take him down?he was weak! all politicians are criminals! people pay for it! im an iraqi, i luv all iraqis i feel sad that they keep dying! i don blame americans, blame ALL politicians every where who decide whats better for their ppl whithout caring about what they need... look at all the voilence every where! who is the victim?peace
vermilionskin 2 years ago
This is Rumsfeld under Bush1 meeting with Saddam to make the deal for the bio weapons to be used on Iran. They were later used on the citizens in northern Iraq.(see Kurds Bio). This is where Saddam's bio weapons came from. Saddam couldn't make his own bio(or WMD). We take thugs and prop them up with money and weapons and then tear them down if they don't go along. Same with Noriega, Osama bin Laden, Pinochet, etc. It's NOT any specific political party, it's just how we do business in general.
vsop333 2 years ago 3
thats right
so you do admit that the us government is responsible for thos thausands of deaths in iraq asia africa?
the american government "made" saddam, they made this killing (bio-kurds) possible?
well if thats so then i suggestion yall should just burn in hel, i am a kurd
bigdjangoboss 2 years ago
Oh absolutely, the American government made that killing possible. Remember, the cowards in power don't represent the citizens. The people of America condemn the actions of the genocidal politicians who made the murders possible. People want the same thing all over the world. It's the coward politicians that do the evil. The Kurds are citizens inside Iraq. That doesn't mean the Kurds agreed with the leader of Iraq.
vsop333 2 years ago
You stupid son of a whore. Iran-Iraq War was from 1980-1988. Bush 1 is not the president till 1989. Ronald REAGAN is the president you dumb retard.
madmaxninja08 2 years ago
Thanks! I just won a bet because of you! I made a bet that the first person to not get it would be a coward. I was right! Stop being such a victim. It's about a war that Bush WANTED to happen, not an old one. Stop looking like an idiot all the time. Try reading the discussion instead of staring at your dog's ass all day.
vsop333 2 years ago
haha right, ok you been expoused as a retard, now you say it's a joke.
when you failed every test in school, did you say to your teachers "i made a bet" ? I am sure you did.
madmaxninja08 2 years ago
Comment removed
vsop333 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
See? we tried "diplomacy" first. Saddam didn't go for it.
b3fiend 2 years ago
that meeting contained how USA was going to start giving more weapons and chemical warheads to Saddam to kill Iranians.
IamJacksColon4 2 years ago
They met before Saddam committed his mega-terrible genocide on the kurds! Rumsfeld and legendary actor Charlton Heston went to the same high school (a few years apart)! Check out great bios like By His Own Rules and Charlton Heston: An Incredible LIfe: Revised Edition (both at amazon)!
Bestmanme08 2 years ago
FRIENDS FOREVER!!
slimshogun 2 years ago 7
and that is 100% the truth, good job!
666bushisnazi666 2 years ago
HAHAHA. I hope our government gets what's coming to them for the lying traitorous rats that they are.
TexasGuy09 2 years ago 4
YAY the good ol days when IRAQ and US were gaining up on Iranian petroleum reserves. I love modern industry, wars are fought to make cash, there no such thing as winning or loosing anymore, its just about how long armed conflict goes on, The longer the better apparently.
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
i got both these dudes # in my cellphone dont hate
christopherspeedy 3 years ago
thats right man its shaking hahahahahah
rashedalani 3 years ago
Its time both Americans and the world Kindly remind ignorant people like Skye820 that
"America Reaps what is sows."
dntmsswthme66 3 years ago
It is amazing that despite these videos, there are people out there that refuse to believe that Reagan and Saddam were allies in the 1980s. Case in point: Skye820. This "woman" on youtube actually thinks that Reagan and Saddam had nothing to do with each other and were actually enemies. Do a search on youtube and find her name and see of her foolish rantings. Better yet, search this youtube cliip and post your comments: "West Chester Victory Rally Silent Night" Remind Skye of Reagan's friends!
dntmsswthme66 3 years ago
See, WE gave Saddam the chemical weapons that he used on the Kurds. Thumbs up to the dictator when he's useful to us and thumbs down when we're done with him. THERE ARE CLIPS ON HERE OF RUMSFELD DECRYING SADDAM'S USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS. UMMM, WHY DID YOU GIVE HIM THE WEAPONS IN THE FIRST PLACE?
vsop333 3 years ago 3
fuck saddam
wahemwahem 3 years ago
I love it how the Republicans say Saddam was so evil, yet they had no problem giving him weapons 20 years ago.
Mrarmageddon8 3 years ago 6
and the democratic congress was what, innocent bystanders?
phdecora 3 years ago
Congress had very little to do with the dealings. Most of Iran's and Iraq's weapon deal deals went on behind closed doors. Plus I'm not saying the dems are any better.
Mrarmageddon8 3 years ago
source plz? im not saying youre wrong, i just want to see the evidence that congress was not involved. especially the senate intelligence committee and the senate armed services committee and others.
phdecora 3 years ago
all of em were involved, as well as members of the british government and french government, this whole war on terror is bigger than iraq, its bigger then 9/11, mark my words, in year 2010 the economy will go into the 2nd depression and americans will die of fright, and the government will push their new laws and Amero currency on us telling us its the only way, we must ressist it. and troops will be brought home and ordered to kill those who rise up against the Gov. the weak will accept it.
911LiesWorldWar3 3 years ago
err... really? i have not met very many soldiers who would fire on their fellow citizens. they swear an oath to the constitution, not to any particular person in government.
phdecora 3 years ago
dont be such a fool, it was soilders who fired on black walstreet killing off the independant rich black man who ran that town, and they bombed that shit to the ground all becuz of the color of therir skin. and lets not forget they killed off the panthers. belive me they will fire if they are conviced that there own citizens are a threat. and the Government wil spue there propaganda to make the true paitriots and rebels fighting for the revolution in 2010 look like terrorist. they did it to MLK
911LiesWorldWar3 3 years ago
sorry, but my grandmother lived in tulsa in 1921, and it was the ordinary white citizens (her neighbors) that burned down black wall street. the military was not required.
MLK could not be made to look like a terrorist, because he was committed to non violence. that is why he has a holiday named after him.
phdecora 3 years ago
u missed my point completely. the point was that black walstreet was burned to the grown while police and us troops didnt do a damn thing about it. wildfires burn down a bunch of rich peoples homes out west and bush shows up in cali talking about his plan to help them. why didnt he do the same in katrina? MLK was called a terrorist by the amerikkkan government, and the CIA and FBI were tapping his phone lines and correta scotts phone lines up until her very death. i kno evil when i see it.
911LiesWorldWar3 3 years ago 2
911lies: i am not sure what your point is. what is your point?
phdecora 3 years ago
Hes referring to "Inactive Coercion", inactive coercion is illegal in public international law. An unproven example of this would be if the United States was aware of a imminent attack on Pearl Harbor, and had sufficient time and resources to intercept the Japanese fleet but choose not too, for one reason or another. Government and state institutions commonly maintain plausible deniability, which makes oversight nearly impossible, which itself invalidates democracy.
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
well, then im asking, which groups and individuals were 'in on it' and which werent? where is the evidence? because saying 'republicans' did it, includes a very large number of people. my dad is republican. do you mean to say he sold weapons to saddam? are you saying democrats were not invovled?
phdecora 3 years ago
Political parties follow state spending, in this regard, they are influenced by peoples job security, because of the vast amounts of people employed by private defense industry, the people who choose military coercion are primarily those who are in control of the majority of defense employers. This is known as a "Permanent Arms Economy" ie. a semi-command-type economy which is directed by corporation executives, based on military industry, and funded by state social spending.
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
During the period of time in which this video was filmed, all unclassified military actions were done legally, including arms export to the Iraq government for use against Iran. The question is whether war corporatism should be illegal, since it involves lower middle class manpower.
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
weel the original reason i posted is because someone said 'the republicans' sold arms to saddam.
as far as laws against 'war corporatism', thats pretty damn vague. to write a good law you have to be specific.
phdecora 3 years ago
WTF. look at 0:17. i'm sure of it 100% it's a freemason Handshake.
MounDoGG 3 years ago 2
jonge jonge jonge grote.Hoe bestaat dit toch?
This is very strange
Hoe is t mogelijk dat ze elkaar de hand schudden?
herjo2 3 years ago
World leader = satan = usa
bringeroftorture 3 years ago
If it wasn't for the US, Saddam wouldn't have gotten so big
brilleaben 3 years ago 5
I love saddam
alsaddam 3 years ago
Cause your DUMB...
zets13 3 years ago
look how rumsfeld lowered his head to saddam like a coward
MementoExpose 3 years ago 6
The real victim here was the Iranian and Iraqi people. i believe Iran was defeating saddam back then when US Navy and Airforce assisted saddam by attacking Iranian ships in the Gulf and then giving saddam chemical weapons helping him mass murder as many iranians and iraqis as possible..and then we ask: "why they hate us..?"
mattz2122 3 years ago 32
That is what you get for trust white people. Anyone who have ever trusted white people have paid their people's lives for it.
shootthedevil 1 year ago
@shootthedevil Dumb comment on so many levels.
roflcopter2006 1 year ago
@mattz2122
iraq was defeating iran actually
iran started a religious war
iraq kept having a nationalist secular war
iran was about taking karbela the holy city of the shiite.
iraq was fighting for the country iraq.
A useless war which made europe and the USA better.
TuRkmEnOkaN 1 year ago
@mattz2122 Iraq bought those chemical weapons off America cuz in 1982 Saddam was making an atomic bomb and was seconds away from success but then Israel bombed that nuclear power facility and donated 1,000,000 keys to Iran,and Iran's main tactic against Iraq was that they forced THOUSANDS of Iranian civilians to charge at the Iraqi forces to lower Iraqi ammunition,and as an American General once said,"Iran was lucky the war ended"(saddam was going to drop 900 pounds of biological WMD on Iran
AssyrianBeast357 1 year ago
@mattz2122 The U.S. never gave Iraq chemical weapons. Despite that fact, every amateur anti-american, socialist or islamist propagandist never fails in saying that they did.
So far, you have 27 thumbs up, which means that many people are as ignorant as you. That's enough to start a club; you could discuss non-facts and prejudiced assertions regularly.
Re5Publica 11 months ago
hey you, faggot inbred, the U.S. DID IN FACT supply Saddam with chemical weapons aside from strategic and tactical information in fighting Iran during the Iran-Iraq War. Even YOUR own right wing supporters such Rumsfeld, Bolton, and Cheney admit it. Are you going to call them socialist?
madmaxninja08 5 months ago
@madmaxninja08 The U.S. did not supply Saddam Hussein with a single chemical weapon, in fact, they barred pesticide shipments to Iraq in 1984, saying that they could be weaponized. Rumsfeld, or Cheney would never admit to giving chemical weapons to anyone, because they never did, let alone to Iraq. You are lying, or have been deceived. I believe you're the victim of a lie repeated so often that you come to believe it. You were probably more susceptible because you're prejudiced to begin with.
Re5Publica 5 months ago
You obviously are a son of a whore. Saddam received chemicals which were in near weaponized form. All Saddam did was assemble and refine it. Saddam also received Bell helicopters with the purpose of spreading the gas. Read a history book moron instead of being a faggot.
madmaxninja08 5 months ago
@madmaxninja08 Now you're changing your story.. first they were chemical weapons, now they're what? ".. chemicals which in near weaponized form"? What the hell does that mean, can you explain it to us?
You were mistaken, and deceived, and it doesn't matter how many times you call me "faggot", or "son of a whore", it won't hurt my feelings or make your statement true, so I don't know why you bother.
Re5Publica 5 months ago
@mattz2122 You're a moron. The U.S. never gave a single WMDs to Saddam, you can thank the Europeans to selling Saddam legit WMDs.
The U.S. only gave Saddam ingredients to Saddam that could be made out of WMDs but the fact is most of the legit WMDs came from Europe.
As soon Reagan discovered Saddam's WMDs program. we banned our trade with Saddam completely.
Hperman09 4 months ago
The real victim here was the Iranian and Iraqi people. i believe Iran was defeating saddam back then when US Navy and Airforce assisted saddam by attacking Iranian ships in the Gulf and then giving saddam chemical weapons helping him mass murder as many iranians and iraqis as possible..and then we ask: "why they hate us..?"
mattz2122 3 years ago 6
It's so hard to keep track of who's a bad evil dictator and who's a good evil dictator these days.
bjkatcher 3 years ago 5
ok, let me simplify:
Bad: EVERY FUCKING WORLD LEADER! (note the word "world leader". It has a different definition then the word "leader".)
Good: NO FUCKING ONE!
They are all a part of the same organization named:
Illuminati / bilderberg / New World Order(NWO)
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
Got any links to sources of anybody credible positing such theories? Capitalist Nationalist's who hate world democracy like Alex Jones hopefully won't be included.
CapitalistHolocaust 3 years ago
Alex Jones is telling the truth, but for the wrong reasons ;)
sadekgheidan 3 years ago
No hard if you have morals and a even small sense of history.
TexanMike 3 years ago
Lest we forget...the right is constantly trying to bring up ghosts from Obama's past. Give me a break.
boloortiz 3 years ago
saddam would kick ur f&!kin ass
latree123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi i am 19 year old girl.
Any honest boys here who like to cam with me on MSN??
go to:
adultfriendfinder(DOT)com/go/g896509
Join this site, its 100% free, dont need creditcard data or something,
and add my friendfinder account(same name as youtube account).
If you are a nice honest guy i will give my MSN on friendfinder,
but first i want to cam on friendfinder.
Aemigurl014 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi i am 19 year old girl.
Any honest boys here who like to cam with me on MSN??
go to:
adultfriendfinder(DOT)com/go/g896509
Join this site, its 100% free, dont need creditcard data or something,
and add my friendfinder account(same name as youtube account).
If you are a nice honest guy i will give my MSN on friendfinder,
but first i want to cam on friendfinder.
GirlCute014 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi i am 19 year old girl.
Any honest boys here who like to cam with me on MSN??
go to:
adultfriendfinder(DOT)com/go/g896509
Join this site, its 100% free, dont need creditcard data or something,
and add my friendfinder account(same name as youtube account).
If you are a nice honest guy i will give my MSN on friendfinder,
but first i want to cam on friendfinder.
GirlCute014 4 years ago
usabissinesman bunsfeld
vellywailer 4 years ago
inspite of the fact that Americans have reached the moon and on their way to mars .. but still have a Government with a Stone-Age Mentality.
surfer120666 4 years ago 22
@surfer120666 hehe interesting point.........i believe the problem is wilsonianism
ille24 7 months ago
Sure, they had good relations before, but USA cheated him and he was not smart, but nobody can say that he was not BRAVE !!
sicklion 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ya he was brave. He was hidding in bravery in a shithole with a santa clause beard. Wow. What an hero.
simhon007 4 years ago
whats the problem??!! you wanna him to stay and say "hurry up and catch me?!!!"
forfaith 4 years ago
reminds me 2pac intro of the song called " GHOST " said in a slowed down voice : " U MuthaFuck'z Can't Stop Me.... Even If I die I'm gon' be a fuckin' problem...Do you Believe In GHOSTS MuthaFucka....Real live black... ghosts
Feel me? " was it saddams voice !!
loooooool I DONT GIVE A FUCK
Str8Slj 4 years ago
is not sadem
ghostamine 4 years ago
are you blind?
bahramks 4 years ago
hahahahaha thx you don't knew sadem
mrd @:
ghostamine 4 years ago
I do know how he looked like, have been seeing footage from him for the past 20 years. And whats with the English dude? what tense are you trying to write it?
bahramks 4 years ago
hatha ba6al al-3robchia al-motakhalefin ?!!!!!
Jame3a 4 years ago
they seem to be afraid of him
zabadytaza 4 years ago
upload-wikimedia-org/wikipedia/en/2/2b/WeeklyStandard-cover-2005-05-30.jpg
It's funny, this cover of the Weekly Standard (the neo-con magazine) tries the same tatic, if only we could have done something like that we wouldn't be stuck in this god-forsaken war.
AutisticPsycho 4 years ago
just exactly whats happening with putin today...
bubbaUK 4 years ago
Since there was no sound back in the 80's I'll supply the dialog:
" Hi Mr Saddam, Im whitey, this is Whitey#2 and this is whitey #3."
"As you can see on the menu, these are all the chemical and biologial weapons we are prepared to give you. no, sorry, no nukes..those are for white people only. anyways we wont tell you what to do, but we wont raise a stink at the UN if you use them on Iran."
Saratogasaratoga 4 years ago 2
LAMO! :))
bahramks 4 years ago
"How are you set for $? We can also help you smuggle drugs for $. We help the Contras with Coke and Osama with his wacky poppy, do you know him? great guy, lil crazy but we give him weapons anyways...no,no,its ok,they really only destroy black ghettos so we don't mind, really.
Saratogasaratoga 4 years ago
This whole thing has a nice touch of Orwell to it.
Scotty7617 4 years ago
Once Rumsfeld dies he and Saddam will shake hands again in hell.
Scotty7617 4 years ago 2
Kerry should have just played this video over and over during 04. It wasn't Bush shaking hands but it shows you who Bush hires.
olivemike81 4 years ago
Why would Kerry do that to his frat brother Bush?
EvilBanker666 4 years ago
loke at this bull and u know the other 4 letter word i hope, well it "shit" bullshit.. hussein abuse his freaking power and that effing yes eeeffing that is ffff means fuckin ...that rumsfeld knew all along. they had it all map out.
de523 5 years ago
You know Lincoln wasn't even on a lot of ballots. He won because there were three parties, not two, and the votes were so split for them.
Bush won in a fair election.
Kerry and Gore were BS
Nezaru 5 years ago
Oceania has always been at war with EastAsia
Rickdeckard2020 5 years ago
i agree
wandomworld88 5 years ago
This was snake-oil salesman Rumsfeld agreeing the deal on nerve gas and weapons for American government business. Saddam used it on the Kurds in 1982/3 when they followed Bush Snr's advice to rise up. The US did nothing, cause it was their gas! WAKE UP AMERICA - THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN CHEESEBURGERS & OPRAH.
davycarton 5 years ago
Americans are so dirty!
They first shake hands with an potential ally, and after they hang him!
Americans Traitors!
CiroBueno 5 years ago
American Leaders, Not American Citizens. Make sure that you say it correctly. The majority of Americans didn't even vote for Bush in his first election. Bush stole that election. The deciding vote for the Bush campaign came from a state where his brother was the governor. They just threw out the votes of Thousands and thousands of black people. And most black people didn't vote for this Bush. So get it right my friend.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
yes probably bush stoled eletions, but that is how your electoral sistem works,in italy we say that the parlament, is the mirrow where a population watches itself, so i think we can agree that if kerry won, your image wouldent probably be mutch better, its time for our american friends to wake up and try to do something, insted of weening about theyr presidnt's mistakes. in europe we are still waiting for you so, GET IT RIGTH, and start more costructive tougth's.
armodio86 5 years ago
I agree with your statement on Kerry being just as bad as Bush. But in a country where votes are thrown out and represented by the electoral college it will be tough. I don't know how well you know our electoral system but our electoral representatives do not have to vote the same way as those whom they represent.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
i'm not critcizing eatch single american citizen, but just the mass of americans that seem's to be blind about the suferrence they create in the world.
greeting's form an european cousyn.
armodio86 5 years ago
that is a problem of all democratic countryes, but the problem is not political, it is a cultural problem, you see if in europe a president of a state said that hanging a man to a rope was a "great act of democracy" his state would be immediatly kiked out from the union, and people would be rioting in the streets.
armodio86 5 years ago
I agree. This country is inherently evil it basically exterminated a race to exist. It enslaved a people to build it and help it grow economically. And finally it has a long history of killing heads of state and some of their citizens to impose it's "democracy" on other countries. I like living here but I don't like being a part of a country who is guilty of such things.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
you have a good head on your shoulders. the usa(CIA) was also behind the 02 attempted coup on hugo chavez, everyone should watch "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" on youtube. CIA snipers took out atleast a douzen civilians and attempted to blame it on chavez in order to sway public opinion.
THEGREATONE420 4 years ago
I agree.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
If the majority of voters are for slavery should we have slavery? A representative republic does not allow for "mob rule" but does allow for representatives to be removed from office if they don't represent.
Bimbeaux 5 years ago
What are you talking about? Do you even know? The electoral college representatives aren't in an office. So they cannot be removed from office. The answer to your first question is if it is fairly voted for then yes. Ethical matters such as should we have slavery do not matter. If something is voted for and passed into law then it is the LAW!
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
Take a look at the percentages that Clinton won with. They are nowhere close to 50%. And, just so you know, the legal ballots allowed to be counted were counted over and over for years and Bush wins everytime. MoveOn.Jackass
Bimbeaux 5 years ago
I don't even have to respond to this, but check out a post that I posted a couple of days before you wrote this response. It is sufficient to serve as my reply, as proven by you getting upset and calling me out of my name. "In other words it wasn't that white people didn't like Clinton becuase of what he did with Monica Lewinski. It was because he was the first "black president". Watch the enraged responses that follow they will prove me right."
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
Those that want diplomacy bitch...even tho here it is (20 years before we attacked the country and countless UN resolutions - Freaking joke btw.). So what would you rather us do? I know, we can just die so they wont have anything to hate us about...oh except the fact they couldnt kill us themselves. Wake the fuck up everyone - what is it going to take?
internalfusion 5 years ago
i would love to send bush in iraq without any security and understand what he did,to show him that freedom has another meaning ,where is the freedom that he promised ??bush is the same league of saddam but the world hasn't relised yet??,it's all about money...and the poors always pay the most alway!
italianissima 5 years ago
Sound please
greasysteve 5 years ago
PEACE IN THE WORLD PLEASE!
N0RTHWEST 5 years ago
The week democrats under the leadership of the even weaker Nancy P. are scared to try to impeach the president even though he lied to congress to start the war. The craziest thing is the Bush family is making a lot of money off of this war. "The only way for congress to keep America safe is for congress to FULLY FUND the war in Iraq and on terror.", Bush says. I declare that Bush Sr. is the spokesperson for a major supplier of weapons.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
TRUEASIATIKTRIBE> Are you really as dumb as you try to be? The voiolence against US troops have been a small part of the shit in Iraq. Nowdays the terrorists are aiming on people of other religion or the Iraqi government soldiers.
Johanoeberg 5 years ago
US Troops should leave Iraq..so the violence will stop.The killing and violence will not stop till there are US troops there! F*ck Donald Duck Rumsfeld!
TRUEASIATIKTRIBE 5 years ago
Before any more uneducated commentary is placed here, note this was over twenty years ago, during the Reagan admin. when Hussein claimed his gov't was 'allied' with the U.S.- at the same time 'accidently' firing a guided missle at the U.S.S. Stark... wake up!@
rockitmanjohn 5 years ago
What a prick! we give him a missile and he fires it back at us. I thought we told him to only fire it at Iran and the Kurds.
EvilBanker666 4 years ago
jesus died for your sins think of that
kesler123456798 5 years ago
Every1 is responiable 4 their own sins. Jesus pbuh was sinless
ssalim 5 years ago
Bush killer, someday you going to die motherfucker!
bagh25 5 years ago
tru..i would like to c bush hanged the same way as saddam..
ssalim 5 years ago
that is vary sad of you to say.. i think mabye it is better if nobody gets hanged from a rope, middle age ha sbeen passed from a while... look's like like not evrybody got that. remember: barbarism will bring only other violence, now is in iraq tomorrow it could reech your pretty litlle houses so be careful and think a little bit more before posting this kind of hateful comments
armodio86 5 years ago
its not hateful msg. its something which tells u the truth about so called Bush Regime. The love oil. The will allow the hanging in 3rd world countries. Just how new UN secretary general & puppet of america said in his opening speech. "Deciding how to carry out capital punishment is bussiness of individual govt's!"
ssalim 5 years ago
oh my god im so tired of people saying the hanging was wrong and shouldnt have been done yeah well the idiots who say that should look at some of the shit hes done then get back to me!
LedZepp92 5 years ago
So what about "some of the shit" bush and blair do on a daily basis. History is littered with "shit" events perpetrated by lunatic politicians in the name of democracy/imperialism/capitalism. Take your pick. How does one madman judge another madman? What our so called leaders do is OK though. Wake up! Fuck em all!!!
zaphenathpaneah2 5 years ago
i think that revange only breang's to new hate and hate only breangs new violence, in civil countrys we got that from something like 200 year's ( in the dukedom of florence it was abolished in 1786 by peter lepold), but mabye americans need a little more time
to get that, probably it is not theyr fault,mabye it is only because they are deeply uneducated.
armodio86 5 years ago
yes i know very well what are crimes of saddam, but, no, i dont think that revenge is a politic solution, the victims of dictature will njot raise from the world of death's now that he has been hanged, and now saddam became a martyr of the sunnis world,
armodio86 5 years ago
Put in search field above: "Saddam mobile" to see entire hanging. This is terrible!
Purpleheart1955 5 years ago
Phew all this is making me crazy-I thing I'll go smoke a fatty.
mothermoore 5 years ago
Ding dong Saddam is dead.
Riessman90 5 years ago
And don't you realize I'm speaking from the viewpoint of less of a citizen of a country, and more as a native of EARTH, or TERRA, or whatever you wanna call this place?
Koriolis 5 years ago
And the average singaporean citizen is more well informed than an average american citizen. Look at our education system, our students are STEEPED in General Paper material.
It takes a TRUE citizen to admit that one's country has its faults, and therefore CAN be improved. You, Root4x, are too caught up in your silly little image of the American Dream to realize that.
Koriolis 5 years ago
. Does it prick at your pride to hear me talk about your leader like that? Well, free speech is a key part of the constitution of the US of A, isn't it? Or should it be "Practiced with discretion" like they put it SO delicately in my homeland? Oh my, is the US turning into the USSR?
Koriolis 5 years ago
And roots4x? From message boards and the immense amount of stuff that is on the net that comes from the US... I'd say that your culture is disseminating at a VERY fast rate. So, if you knew to check my profile, I live in singapore. While our govt isn't completely democratic, and also not super on the human rights side. I am NOT the govt. Apparently you have not the discerning skills to make the distinction. Noticed I actually DID? Look at my previous posts
Koriolis 5 years ago
Roots4x
You are a fool. I'm not just speaking for the USA. I'm speaking for humanity itself. Can you not understand that the world DOES NOT revolve around the USA? And please, your country is SO vibrant and SO democratic and since democracy is SO about free-flow of info... I know more than enough.
And, please, as I said, accept other people's views for a CHANGE. It would benefit your country if y'all got CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM.
Koriolis 5 years ago
Roots4x sorry - I can't stand behind the likes of the Idiot Bush and his cronies in crime. He is allowing this country to be flushed down the toilet for a buck to his friends. I love America that's why we should impeach Bush. He's a moronic coke snorting drunkard fool.
DokterD 5 years ago
Bush's policies favor the wealthy. The republican party's government has also taken away valuable financial aid assistance to us college students and permenantly raised the interest rates on student loans. Which hurts those who make the least the most. Guess who that is . . ., According to the 2003 Census the avg income for whites was $46,900, and for blacks $29,026 which was also a 3 percent decline. Poverty for whites is 8 percent and blacks 24.1 percent.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
In other words it wasn't that white people didn't like Clinton becuase of what he did with Monica Lewinski. It was because he was the first "black president". Watch the enraged responses that follow they will prove me right.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
I'm an United States Citizen and Enasberg you are right the citizens of the United States not being the boss of the United States. If we were then Bush wouldn't have been president in the first place. Secondly the white people in the U.S. felt that Clinton was such a bad president because his policies helped minorities and them. They didn't like having a president that was well received by black people.
RobertPlatinum 5 years ago
Terrorists are lucky the United States is as nice as it is. Suspected terrorists are held at Guantánamo Bay and then released a year later??? They are lucky the United States doesn't play the way the Nazis did. (i.e. kill EVERYONE)
Riessman90 5 years ago
You're a fucking moron. David Hick's has been held for 5 years with no trial. No convictions. Now they aren't even allowed to see lawyers in Guantanamo bay because a few peolpe killed themselves. The United States is an imperialist fascist nation
de4dhead 5 years ago
USA are stupid!!!
NOTE: don´t say "American citizens" to the people that live in USA, They aren't the boss of America!!
enasberg 5 years ago
roots4
I live in the US I am American and Americans are the most ignorant people on earth. You just need to do a trip outside of the US to realize.
davidmarsansss 5 years ago
Them Americans so stupid they believe everything their government tells them and their control the media so it's all fake up their, and the problem is
they Really believe their right, question..? where were the mass destruction tools..? hmm okay another one who the fuck are these judges lawyers in his courd not iraq's thats for sure.. maybe some imigrates from america?..hmmm
Criskross87 5 years ago
How does the Kyoto Protocol have anything to do with the Geneva Conventions? And Koriolis, while the US may not be the most humanitarian country, we are by far not the worst. I wonder what country you are from. Are your country's hands so clean?
roots4x 5 years ago
While few educated people in the US deny that Bush may not be the most capable president, we still stand by our leader. To a certain point, we must stand by our elected officials. We can't be babies and whine about how they're not doing what we want them to do. Koriolis, you don't live here, and you only know about this country from what you hear in the news and message boards. Educate yourself a little bit.
roots4x 5 years ago
roots4x, you could not be more wrong. We never HAVE to stand by our leaders. They serve us. We do not serve them. Also, people "whining" about their leaders is a little thing called democracy. We elected them, so I think we should be allowed to criticize them when they don't do people, who they work for, want them to do.
Scotty7617 4 years ago
Another thing, roots4x, you seem to forget that their would be no United States today had it not been for a couple of "whining babies."
Scotty7617 4 years ago