2008 Infiniti EX35 by Edmunds' Inside Line

[dmnevels1]

16.6seconds in the 1/4 and has 297hp and does 0-60 6.3seconds They cant drive.

[quatlen]

It is ugly just like its closest competitor the Acura RDX.

[brucec43]

@quatlen Yes, your '93 Oldsmobile Bravada is much more attractive

[quatlen]

@brucec43 Just my opinion that most others agree with. I don't drive a 1993 Bravada.

[Illmatic662]

What gives edmunds? This is from your own site:

"But when you're looking for a little bit of hurry from the EX35, it's there for you. It leaves in a decent amount of haste from a stop, getting to 60 mph in 6.3 seconds and then passing through the quarter-mile in 14.6 seconds at 96 mph. A BMW X3 is left far behind."

HUH?! Thats completely different then the 16.6 time that was given in the video this is a clarification for anyone considering buying that they made a little error.

[yourmotherrules]

yeah i read that too.

[occckid123]

there so stupid with the 16.6 lol

[ambientflier]

16.6 seconds in the 1/4? That's definitely a mistake. The FX35 did 15.5, and this thing is a lot quicker, and it has an engine that has a lot of top end.

It should be about a 15.0 max.

[imking7]

isnt just like a pathfinder never mind this thing isnt the ex

[smartkid1985]

too bad the murano doesnt perform this way even thought its off the altima platform :-(

[oneviwatara]

I think the EX35 needed a 7 speed stransmission and 5 inches longer.

[ilovenissan]

yes its called the fx

[oneviwatara]

No.

[sterlingnobles]

If the EX had the 7 speed tranny it would be a g35 but bigger lol.

[oneviwatara]

No. EX already have a 7 speed in Europe and in Japan,but not here in America.

[cbotten106]

No mention of the diminutive backseats or the gas mileage...guess Edmunds wanted to keep a positive spin.

[sojux42o]

wait 0-60 in 6.3 and 1/4 mile in 16.6 seconds? HUH!???? makes no sense

[xvaall]

why? everything depends on gear ratios. put them closer at low and you will get better low speed acceleration. but here is AWD, they all a faster at the beginning (especially comparing with FWD)

[occckid123]

16.6 1/4 mile is a big mistake. That doesnt even sound right. They should have caught that big clue. A car that does 0-60 in 6.3 sec does not do the 1/4 in the 16's.

[hong99sm]

C&D measured 14.6 sec at 98 mph

[BABBYGORILLA73]

i beleave it

[toyotas2006]

@occckid123

A 6.3 0-60 time translates to about 15.8 1/4 mile

Unless they had two 200 lb passengers board at 40 MPH!

[toyotas2006]

@toyotas2006

I mean 16.4

Sorry

[occckid123]

@toyotas2006 no it doesnt a vehicle that does 7.3 usually translates to a 15.8. This does a 14.6-14.8 in the 1/4

[ambientflier]

@toyotas2006 0-60 in 6's should actually be high 14's, low 15's.

[dukviper90]

@ambientflier no, it depends on the gearing. I'm pretty sure this car has strong 1st and 2nd gear but the rest are probably tuned for fuel economy and ride.

[CARFANATIC552]

my parents always get a five seater and this looks promising.

[M1GreenEagle]

very nice!

[deathfairyfilms]

it looks like a nissan's rogue mmm nice interior

[johnjohn0701]

kool so each car brand is going to make a kool wagon for the market