If you set aside the time to experience 'Tuesday Morning in September'.. You may come away from it..changed in some way. If you treat it like disaster porn, then you get nothing. That is one of the main reason it is on DVD. It is distinctly different from anything that day- to this day.. However, you will never know by handling it like footage. . It is not mere footage. It is an experience that stands alone from that day that needs no intro, and or overdubbed narration. By itself it stands
There is an upload on my channel of an over two hour video of the wtc attacks, that was not released for nearly a decade. It is the most complete account in real time that has ever surfaced.
@chrisp11699 I keep getting asked that! I got it from a friend. If it has a name I don't have a clue. It is probably German. If you want a copy drop me a PM with a email address.
I would say the tire could also be from the 2nd black/grey military plane that had no windows and no emblems on it like the eyewittnesses on the streets told us in the live interviews.
So i go with radiusmag2.
And we can consider that explosives were used too, cuz Nist Report didn`t check the debris for explosives or radioactivity (thermonuclar demolition). They only mentioned that there theoretical were no explosives and refused to test it.
NON-conspiracy 130 minute real-time WTC Attack video chronicle. Upload is on my channel. Something NEW from that day. 130 minutes of never before seen - continuous running account. (most complete known ) Authentic; pristine; uncensored. It is 9/11 as it was that day for most everyone outside of Ground Zero. Please take the time to listen/watch the over two hour authentic rarity. It is not disaster pornography. It transcends so much of what has been released from that day. It is on DVD.
have any of you retards ever seen the 9 ton turbo fan jet engines on a boeing jetliner so much larger than the police tape shot size reference in this. take a look at JASSM footy here on skrewtoob.dont forget the rollsroyce engine fans are ceramic composites they cant burn.media programmed hypnovictims all of you idiots.
@progrocky I must have said at least 30 times nobody EXCEPT the "truthers" fools claim that the steel melted. There are or used to be, haven't looked in a long time, several very detailed fact filled videos on the web. The two best done by National Geographic and Popular Mechanics. If they're still up on their site, (both run about an hour) watch them and you just might learn something.
Excellent video. Solid proof of commercial planes in the wreckage. However, it doesn't disprove all of the "truther" theories, such as the most convincing imo, of the drone technology. I mean you no disrespect. I love my country. Generations of my family have fought and defended it. However, I urge you to watch the video below and to research project northwoods, along with "dancing israelis 9/11"
if interested in a rarity, (From 9/11/2001) There are essentially two DVDs from 9/11. FROM 9/11.. One is a production from French filmakers that gives us the experience through the firemen, police, and emergency workers at Ground Zero. The other, is not a production: 'Tuesday Morning in September', captures the essence; the spirit, the heart, of most everyone outside of Ground Zero that day, by an American. (both top shelf) There is a preview of the 130 min DVD on my channel.
if interested in a rarity, (From 9/11/2001) There are essentially two DVDs from 9/11. FROM 9/11.. One is a production from French filmakers that gives us the experience through the firemen, police, and emergency workers at Ground Zero. The other, is not a production: 'Tuesday Morning in September', captures the essence; the spirit, the heart, of most everyone outside of Ground Zero that day, by an American. (both top shelf) There is a preview of the 130 min DVD on my channel.
For a perspective outside of Ground Zero on 9/11/2001, please watch: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day that was not released for nearly a decade. It is something from that day, that is not a production, but is an authentic continuous running chronicle of the 911 wtc attacks. You can preview the entire 130 minute account.. on my channel.
The only continuous TWO HOUR VIDEO of the 9/11 wtc attacks that is known to exist: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day you have NOT seen. You may have seen other posts about it on Youtube. It is not like so much other crap that has been put out since 9/11; it is not a propaganda, and or opinion piece. It has no fair comparison with anything. It is 9/11 like you have never seen. Please preview the 130 min chronicle. There is an upload on my channel
316Bh you are either stupid as a stump, are under some spell, or you are part of the group that perpetrated this mass murder and you are a part of the false flag core...Fuck off Jack ass... the truth is obvious
no evidence can convince conspiracists. they will probably say that it's a fake wheel. they believe what they want to believe, facts and logic don't stand in their way.
Are you idiot? They said that fire made steel soft and thats why WTC collapsed. How on earth survived plane parts? They are made from aluminium. Plane tire hasn't burned. There should be plane wings not engine and tires (Aluminium melts at 660 C and steel 1530 C) . Tires are inside of plane during the flight. And number one question is how on earth aluminium plane cuts through the concrete and steel? Have you seen plane crash test?
@WILLIEOFROANOKE. Thanks for calling me stupid nice way to make your point! and I'm the moron LOL. Anyway, I was just making an observation. God bless the US that allows moron like us have a discussion on things we don't know. It's ok to ask questions that is how we find answers. BTW I love the you're asking questions.. yeah, "how can someone plant an aircraft engine in the street on NYC?" can someone help WILLIEOFROANOKE? HE NEEDS ANSWERS TOO
Man, so much information out here that is confusing but the pic of the mangled plane turbine you put up does not showed any sign of fire and it looks rusted. Stop posting false information!
@316BH Were you born stupid, or did you have to work at it? I'm so sick of clods pretending that isn't the "right" engine. Well doofus, explain how anyone could get ANY aircraft engine planted in the middle of the street at the height of morning rush hour in a major city like NewYork and nobody sees them doing it. I know none of you morons will even try to answer. LOL!
@willieofroanoke Keep in mind that the internet is full of idiots and dolts that will argue anything. You will never "convince" insane people of anything. Also, Islamic terrorists watch these videos and will post comments to try to shift the blame from the people responsible. I see these type comments from Islamic scum attacking Jews nearly everyday on Nazi Holocaust videos.
@willieofroanoke Thank you for posting these pictures. Unlike the idiots here who haven't a clue or shred of proof of a conspiracy, I am a NYC commuter, work for the US DOJ, and was there on Tuesday Sept 11. The engine part at 0.55 I saw first hand and took a photo with a disposable camera. It came from the 2nd plane. It landed on Church & Chambers St. It took off the top corner off 100 Church St before landing here. If I could upload my photos in comments I would. The CIA didn't put it there.
Thanks. Both Popular Mechanics and National Geographic have done excellent pieces that blow up all the silly "truther" nonsense. They both get shown on tv on the cable channels once in awhile while I haven't checked in awhile used to be on their respective web sites also use to be on Youtube, maybe still is.
@willieofroanoke It is my hope that you're making some kind of profit out of insulting everyone the challenges your opinion. Calling a person stupid does not prove anything but shows what you are.
@irlittleboii Wow! is the all you have to said? At least write something constructive or are you unable to formulate an opinion on the subject. I made an observation whether it's right or wrong is beside the point. Please think prior to posting such a plain comment it shows your lack cognitive ability.
I believe that the planes hit. I believe there is no way in hell those building free fall fell the way they did if there were not explosives installed in the towers. People that are afraid can make fun of people like me. There is so much more to this than what you saw on TV. Why do you think the government is trying to get control of the internet now? Also how do you know those photo's are legit did you take them? What about building 7 falling? I feel we were lied to in a huge way!
Congratulations, you found some props and a dinky missile engine. Even if these parts were from those planes, 1) where’s the rest of the wreckage, fixtures, luggage, bodies, etc. 2) Professional/military pilots have testified on record that a) it’s impossible to fly passenger jets 400+ mph at sea level and b) it’s impossible for anyone, let alone amateurs who couldn’t control a Cessna, to hit buildings with such precision. Planes may have been hijacked but they sure weren’t flown into buildings
you are the biggest idiot in the world. 1) The rest of the wreckage is buried and moved around. IT WAS SCATTERED AS THE 110 STORY BUILDING COLLAPSED. 2) It wasn't at sea level and it is possible to control a plane with such precision. You have no proof of their speed or their flying experience.
@duralate Yea what do those silly pilots and veterans know. The WTC wasn't at sea level??? lol
So was the wreckage at the Pentagon and Shanksville scattered as the buildings collapsed too? Look at every video and picture of the supposed crash scenes you want, you will find one single, small engine and enough parts to fit in a pickup truck... no raging fires... all evidence of a missile, not a 80-100 ton jetliner... and NO tail section, fixtures, luggage, bodies... NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY.
no bodies, but body parts were discovered. I believe a man was returned his wife's ring from her dismember hand that was discovered among the rubble. Her name was Ruth McCourt. She had been on one of the planes with her 4 year-old daughter.
My dad's co-worker was there in NY that day. He heard a plane and saw a plane.
@duralate "the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots..." NASA Senior Executive Dwain Deets
You have no proof of how much proof I have or how much investigation I've done.
But hey just keep believing the Muslim conspiracy theory the Feds and corporate media spoon feed you. I"ll take the pilots, veterans, engineers, eyewitnesses, etc
After you take the time to discover what this chronicle is.. you may want to share it with others. It is the only realtime chronicle, that captures the essence of what those outside of Ground Zero, were experiencing that day. There are other videos that in part do the same, but none as complete, and variegated as this one: 'Tuesday Morning in September'.
if i were behind the conspiracy I'd use plains , way too much info to gain , and creates plausible deniability , just because plains were used does not deny a gov conspiracy no matter what you believe , its f'd up period and lets hope the laws passed since dont take advantage of us law abiders
It's seems credible that planes did strike the WTC that day but the way those buildings came down...pulverized. That's just way to strange and the small amount of rubble left in ground zero.Plus you'd figure many of these things would have melted if the fire was hot enough to melt steel.
that theory of there being no planes is really stupid, but there are a lot of things that still don't add up about that day, like the pentagon and WTC7 ect
People that search for the "TRUTH" won´t take 2 seconds to listen to anything else than THEIR TRUTH.
It´s like asking one of these religious dipshits that beliefe the earth is a few thousand years old, why we find bones of dinosaures today, of animals that weren´t mentioned anywhere in the bibel.
@k1dicarus Sadly true. The "truther" movement is mainly a bunch of brainwashed dummies that are certain what happened on 911 didn't happen the way it happened. Can they prove what they believe and that it happened some other way? Heck no, but they are damn sure it didn't happen the way most people think. LOL!
@willieofroanoke Thebest part is that you get a different story depending on who you talk to! I have met truthers from a wide range of theories! Some tend to believe it was terrorist attacks, but think the government was involved, or set it up, all the way to extreme, no planes, everyone is a government sheep!. What an extreme insult to the victims families. "an alluminum plane cant enter a steel building!" it's called force and energy fuck tards! look it up!!!! nice video BTW.
Most people who believe 9-11 was an inside job don't rebut that Planes hit the building. They claim the far more believable conspiracy. The conspiracy that elite entities inside the homeland security department had prior knowledge of the attack and did everything in their power to maximize its affects and to make sure the attacks were completed. So to most conspiracy theorists this video means absolutely nothing. Good try. However you may have convinced a few people to slide their rose colore
The bomb is planted....boooom....terrorist wins! haha, These parts of plains are planted like the explosives inside to the towers. Moron, listen the audio of 1º Chief of firemans, he said he need 2 units to end the flames of fire. after that, somebody blow that tower.
@davideoballes You so damn dumb you don't even know the difference between planes and plains. Oh, you are just a typical ignorant "truther" nitwit.
You buffoons have any idea how much explosives it would take to "blow" two 110 story buildings each that weight over 1/2 billion pounds not counting contents?
@willieofroanoke . dude give the guy a break... he spelt with the wrong 'plane' you have made mistakes. If people who know the truth are called 'truthers' people - such as your self - must be called liars... "you buffoons have any idea how much explosives it would take to 'blow' two 110 story buildings each that weight over 1/2 billion pounds not counting contents"? .... do you have any idea on how two planes can knock down three buildings....
@randomtrader1 I know how 2 planes can knock down 3 buildings.
They crash into the buildings and weaken the structure, and then melt steel from burning fuel. This causes things above it to lose support and fall down.
OBVIOUSLY when the upper floors come crashing down it will bring the rest of the building down too, because there is a lot of weight coming down.
@willieofroanoke Yes, its correct to find plane parts, that are real planse or placed parts. Doesn't matter. Fact is, planes or fire form kerosin did not melt steel. A nuke fron down under does.
Dont you felt ground shaking before tower colapsing?
we should play some russian roullett of blind following trust in a government or following search for truth even we need looads of bullets may this discustion will end then
@JayyPeeBS There is NO basis to anything so-called "truthers" keep saying. Nothing. Just look back at all the crap they've suggested. Holograms, doctored tv footage, bombs, planted explosives, missles, drone planes, the government ploting, killing civilians, etc..
NONE of that kind of crap has a scrap of proof. Just crazy half-ass fringe crackpots running their mouths.
Wow...why does the engine and tire look so small for a commercial airliner??? I mean have you stood at an airport looking at the size of the engines and tires ? If anything youare raising more questions. Everybody wants this event to fade away like the Kennedy assasinations but it won't...EVER! Concrete and steel do not turn to dust from burning jet fuel, scientifically impossible.
@djcolourzone Yeh, the engine looks like from a private jet...too small on a b767 they are 2mt in diameter,this one is long like a st sign. Less than 1 mt??? the tyres would be squashed even if they "survived" the collapse of a building on top of them...and the windows look like not burned at all except some. I mean after all that every part of the plane should be "dust".
@txtdrivers Even the parts at the pentangon were insignificant. the way it penetrated all the way to the inner ring suggests a bunker buster not an aluminum commercial plane. Yup we're just crazy iiliterate bastards....LOL !!! Common sense...just common sense !
@willieofroanoke No it did not, that is an absolute lie! Once again there will be no evidence to support this other than somones testimonial. Building 7 had no major impact damage after the towers collapse, and you only need to look at all the other WTC building inbetween the towers and building 7 to see the massive impact damage they recieved, yet they certainly did not implode, because it is impossible without explosives. Study the laws of motion you mind numbingly silly man.
@willieofroanoke So what is your major problem little willy? You simply cannot stand to see people stop and think about things, it infuriates you to the core. How dare they use independent thinking. You're holding onto a lot of inner anger and bitterness. Don't let self pride weigh your life down, the smart thing to do, is ask for help. Be Smart!
@willieofroanoke 2 set of 4 in the back (8) and 2 in front. So if a set of 4 from the back falls they all fall together considering if the landing gear was down before impact which is most unlikely because they go down under a certain speed. A low speed less than 200 knots!!! and I don't believe they slow down the plane in that situation to extend the landing gear.
@txtdrivers To land where??? So the landing gear was still inside and if there was so much heat to melt the steel structure of the building there was enough heat to melt the rubber those windows left and everything else considering the whole plane went inside the building like a hot knife in the butter. wake up boy.
I will I agree with what someone said to me once.. and that it is not good for kids to read and believe they can not trust the U.S government, its bad for the safety and security of all citizens as a whole, to believe there was ever an inside job.
Personally, I just hope to raise awareness of the possibility of it, and have people expectant to judge things using their own independent thought, rather than being scared of the current childish name calling control technique that is too boring.
So all truthers are idiots simply because we perceive that the whole story isn't being told?? And we have the guts to ask questions! I tell you what! All you who do not question the official story, please continue your ways if you want all that any of us who have questions ask is that you don't treat us like shit! I mean all humans are not wired the same! We will all have different opinions about things! Hopes, fears, and dreams will all be different. The day that changes ,we're no longer human!
@TheConshuscriterion I for one appreciate variety! I simply hate ignorant and rude behaviour! We are all neighbors! If you don't wish to be respectful to others then why don't you go ahead and commit suicide and do the world a favor already! Cause you are no better than the terrorists, politicians, and fundamentalist idiots out there who would kill someone because of his race or religion!
@TheConshuscriterion The whole story is NEVER told, the public couldn't handle the whole truth. You think that's news? What if anything the sad events of 911 showed was how ill prepared the country's government and military were for a surprise attack, just like they weren't when Perl Harbor happened. That does not suggest something kooks keep suggesting happened. HAARP technology? Put the comic book down.
@willieofroanoke The comic book? LOL! Now thats funny! Thats the best one I've heard yet! And Pearl Harbor didn't just happen. Roosevelt came out years later and said that he as much as knew that Pearl Harbor was gonna happen! And whether or not he knew and didn't stop it or knew because he was part of the planning doesn't matter to me! He still allowed it to happen and alot of good people died that day! My Grandpa Gwynn was there and was lucky to be alive!
@TheConshuscriterion and it isn't the public that couldn't handle the news but instead the government who is too chicken shit to tell the truth and possibly give up what they have to better mankind instead of continuing their greed and lust after money, control etc. H.A.A.R.P is real, G.W.E.N towers are real. Even though I know about these things it doesn't empower me! I am still as vulnerable as you or anyone else! But at least when they take over I'll know what hit me!
This is funny in the sense several people have wrote a comment or sent a PM they really hate this "song" and others like you and me actually like it. The truth is this... I have no idea what the true name of this is. It was sent to me by a friend that lives in Germany many years ago.
So if you and others like it, send me a PM with a valid email and I'll email you a copy as a wav file attachment.
The public is brainwashed. Movies like Fail Safe that pretend that NORAD and SAC are watching the skies and will immediately swoop into action within seconds is BULLSHIT! The fact is on 911 NORAD had to be called on the phone by FAA controllers and tell those numbnuts that the WTC had been hit twice. Even after being told they had no orders to respond! All that happened initially was two fighter jets, both unarmed flew out
@willieofroanoke What is the movie Fail Safe?? Haven't seen it! I used to be a good all american kid, I served my country proudly! Until one day I blew out my knee and the military treated me like a third class nobody, wouldn't fix my knee even though it happened on active duty! I was upset! Wanted to know how they could get away with not doing right by their soldiers! So I started to study! And the more I learned about how the world really works the sicker I became!
@TheConshuscriterion Fail-safe is an excellent movie made back at the height of the cold war. I highly recommend it. It stars Henry Fonda as president, Water Matthau, Larry Hackman that later had the J R Ewing role on Dallas. It mostly happens at NORAD when a squad of fighters on an exercise get a "go signal" and proceed into Russian Air space planning to drop nukes on Moscow. If they suceed, Fonda offers to nuke New York to prevent WWIII. Riviting.
I watch it every time it comes on tv. It is one of the those movies you can switch channels on. You have to watch, even knowing what happens. The plot is a morality play. Should the president give the order to help the Russians shoot down are own planes? How will the military respond. If one bomber gets through should the president give the order to nuke New York or go all out and try to wipe out the Russians. Note I didn't say how it ends.
It is way better than today phony action movies. A real sit on the edge of you chair drama. As the squad of fighters each get shot down with our help, will the Russians listen to us when it gets down to 2 plane one a decoy or won't they trust us? Will the wife of the last pilot be able to talk her husband into turning back? Will the president be able to? Correction. Were bombers, not fighters. Also can't switch channels. I type too fast. LOL!
@willieofroanoke I have come to a point in my life now where I no longer want retribution for my past problems! I no longer am angry about everything, though some points still tip my scale! I simply want to learn all that I can! I pray all the time that Almighty God guide my hands during my research and He shows me many hidden things! I have eyes to see and ears to hear! He has pulled the veil away from my eyes that I might come up out of this Mystery Babalon! No longer fooled!
To their fail safe point, about 200 miles East over the ocean! Getting them orders to turn around and actually head towards New York and later DC tooks some frantic phone calls. No, the news media didn't talk much about that.
@KungFriedChicken I still believe it was Thermite charges set up weeks in advance, with a toggle switch that would only trigger at certain vibrational frequencies. Such as those caused by Acoustic Electromagnetic Pulse weapons from a satellite in space! Do you also remember that there was a hurricane just off the coast that day that never made it to shore much less got a mention in the news!? Hurricane Erin! Only H.A.A.R.P technology could've kept the storm literally at bay!
What every quack 911 theorist forgets is the initial rupture, spilling of jet fuel from the plane's engines is only the IGNITION point. It is the building contents much very flamable that causes much of the damage.
@KungFriedChicken Again you confirm you're nothing but a full blown fuckwit.
Ever see a car fire up close, I did. Turned out to be my neighbor. He happened to leave for work about five minutes ahead of me. I go down the same road. I see smoke. Gets thicker as I get closer. Time I'm there his car is fully involved smoke at least 100 feet in air, flames over the roof of car, then boom the gas tank explodes. That's only 20 gallons or so of gas. Were talking 10,000 gal per WTC.
@KungFriedChicken What you are guility of is constantly blubbering that the planes crashing into the WTC couldn't be the cause of the buildings coming down. You keep yelling that explosives MUST be the cause yet you never even try to explain how. The bottom line is if it was explosives and I'm just humoring you, why any planes added, they're then not needed, right? You're just talking shit.
@willieofroanoke Man you talk so much shit its not funny.. the planes served nothing more than shock and awe.. the tempretures you talk about to weaken the steal would cause all humans to instantly combust just from the radiant heat alone, yet many humans are visually still alive on the very same floors. Your theory is impossible to recreate using physical modelling, my theory is not. simple as that. All they had to do was check out all the steel but they would not allow it!
@willieofroanoke but no no man, all you need is 20'000 U.S gallons (worlds smallest gallon) , and that has enough power to knock down 3 skyscrapers and pulverize the 260 odd floors worth of building material all the way down into a small pile of rubble sitting on its former footprint.. yup its natural for things to fall like this hey bud :)
@willieofroanoke you forget building 7 was 47 storeys dipshit.. can you see how people laugh at you, not with you.. See Bud, we don't expect you to realise your stupidity, because you're stupid, but we care about you.
@KungFriedChicken We were talking the 10k gallons of fuel in one building. Nice how now you add the second building, so the observer of the debate calculates 5k gallons per building, when in reality if you add the second building, we are talking about 20,000 gallons. Caught you again Chris Angel making 15,000 gallons of fuel disappear. That's diversion tactic #4. Now about your pots and pans theory, There were an estimated 156500 kitchen fires from the source I found in 2002.
@KungFriedChicken No, You are NOT using my logic, Your misdirection tactic # 3 caught again. You have used a evasive reply tactic without addressing your statement that 10000 gallons of jet fuel is "relatively little" . You still will not acknowledge when this "burns off" the fire does not go out, whereas thousands of tons materials continues to burn. There was more in those buildings than just steel and concrete. This is not the Flintstones. We are done here.
@KungFriedChicken I'm no engineer and don't claim to be an expert, but I did have to read some of N.I.S.T.'s report for a paper on contributing architectual factors/flaws. Their conclusions are all cited, not leaps of logic or assumption. There are some strange anomalies but the magnitude of the relationship of forces unleashed negate much of how we assume materials should behave. Steel only has to reach 50% of it's melting point to lose 70% integrity, for instance
@Danarchistic1 but the nist report never explained the complete collapse of WTC 1 n 2... they stop after their first explaination of a floor slip and just assume they all kept falling like dominos at free fall speed. Nist report was delayed, underfunded and massively incomplete. and they most definately did not follow standard procedures. The report is probably the worlds worst recorded investigation.
@KungFriedChicken I can tell you, I'm no cheerleader for the government and I'm not gullible. I'd be willing to read other credible studies. Are any available? I simply haven't seen anything more convincing than NIST. I've only seen youtube videos that, of course, just come off silly.
@Danarchistic1 well the easy thing to do was investigate all the steal. Its the only way. But they did not even allow the investigation to begin until the steel was shipped off to china to be recycled. That alone should tell you this investigation is a joke. Even to come up with the theory they did come up with would require all the steel to be investigated but they didnt do that remember. Nist report is nothing more than a theory that is impossible to demonstrate with modelling.
@Danarchistic1 Somebody prove the official theory with modelling. No theory is relevant without modelling to demonstrate the possibility of it happening. So when was this modelling done to come up with the theory they have?.. Answer is, they never have and never will show the public the required physical modelling, only provide endless windbag dribbles of crap, that you will not truly comprehend, but it sounds good enough, and you only offer a worthless patriotic view point.
@Danarchistic1 I did not mean you're worthless that did not sound good hehe, I meant the report is worthless, with an impossible theory to replicate with scale modelling, so your appreciation and support of the report is nothing more than a patriotic view point that has no real worth.
What does some dope like you think hit the WTC? You are aware EACH of the 4 planes were being tracked by FAA radar, well maybe you're too stupid to know that.
I bet you still believe in Santa Clauses, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.
Care to explain what turning off transponders, not responders you idiot, has to do with ditching at sea? I bet the average cucumber has a higher IQ then you do.
@willieofroanoke The point is it is impossible for the planes to be the reason the buildings completely imploded the way they did, the whole idea of the planes being holograms is pointless nonsense. Real or not real planes, it is most definately not the cause of the buildings complete collapse. However, your question does highlight how easily fooled you are by what you see on television. A plan hits the building and the building falls down means it must be the reason huh.. yeah to a dumbass
@KungFriedChicken Ok stick to your goofy story. You now need to explain how dozens of every day people with their cameras and video cameras caught the exact same impact and aftermath we saw "faked" on tv. So go ahead. Tell us how that works.
@KungFriedChicken Have you ever heard of Telemetry? There is an episode of "The Lone Gunmen" a subsequent spinoff of the X-Files where a planes controls were taken over by the government and the plane was to be flown into the WTC! The Lone Gunmen overrode the controls at the last minute and saved the day however this tv show was filmed years before 9/11/01. It is a known fact that planes as big as 747s have been flown by telemetry same as Predator drones are flown now!
@KungFriedChicken Just food for thought and a different perspective! However I saw a recent video from Japanese news about how, after a rainstorm occurred, they used the mist afterwards to produce a hologram to make it appear as if a whole city was there when in fact it was not! So Holography isn't out of the spectrum! Project Blue Beam from the Air Force is working in conjunction with H.A.A.R.P to produce effects of holography coupled with 'sounds' to accomodate the hologram!
@78931jjs This keeps going in circles. If not planes, then explain where the people on the four jets are now. Funny how "truthers" always dodge that simple question.
Those 266 passangers and crew were real people. Many security cameras capture many of them boarding, going through security. If not dead, where are they? Dead cold silence from the "truther" nitwits.
I don't get it, it was a fake bag of plane parts that the nation watched live as it crashed into the building? God thing they got it right on the first try. Also, retard Dana if the tire is down on the ground not in the burning building how is it supposed to burn? Think about what you guys say before posting dumb shit that makes no sense. Really I see no plane? WTF do you expect from one that just crashed into a building at 500mph.
@megolem I was one that also watched live tv as events unfolded. Truther idioticy has no bounds. Bin landen WANTED the world to be watching. After the 1st plane hit he knew every freaking tv network in the world would be picking up live feed from cameras trained on the WTC. So about 20 minutes later, bang! Second plane slams into WTC.
Fake video? The event was captured on dozens of video cameras taped by average everyday citizens. Guess what, their sequences line up perfectly.
Some early "truther" Ace Baker, a goofy looking shoulder length hair hippie and part time musician was one of the first kooks to scream what we saw on tv was faked. He's also on record saying the FBI or CIA rounded up the 266 passenger and crew, flew them to a "secret" military base and murdered them. He also claims all the moon landings were faked. This doofus also tried to fake his own sucide on live radio, where, yeah you hear a gun shot. Typical truther moron.
The jet fuel didn't have to melt the steel. The horizontal joists got hot enough to sag. That sag created immense stored kinetic energy where they joined the verticle beams. When those joints eventually let go and released that energy, it was almost like another explosion. Those plane fragments probably blew straight through and weren't inside long enough to melt.
@KungFriedChicken Look at it this way,,,if you can. You dump 12 ounces of lighter fluid on your mattress and light it. It will burn your house down. You are telling me 10000 gallons of jet fuel is a "relatively small volume of fuel" and cannot ignite a building. You sir, can dump your "drive by" partial "truth" somewhere else
What I just explained is more than enough to defeat any "truther" bullshit. Nothing in the way of missles, bombs or explosives are needed to explained why the towers came down due to a pancake implosion simply due to the weight. Once the first floor failed it started an impossible to stop chain reaction, Confirmed by Newton's first law of motion.
I actually addresses this in another of my videos titled "WTC Reality Check" Start at the 42 second mark. At about 55 seconds you see a close up of the puny size of the boths that held up the floors. You expect a handful of bolts that size already weakened from the first to cary a nearly a million pound load? Remember that weight increases by roughly 14 tons with each lower floor. Wake up!
@willieofroanoke So you're saying there is a third world like building code in the usa, and their shyscrapers in themajor cities are a serious danger to public safety.
I'm saying an object that weighs around a million pounds and actually gets heavier has it falls and gains new mass is an unstopable object. That object was the first fire floor to fail and all the floors above it. So what do you do, babble about third world fire codes. You're beyond pathetic in your "reasoning" skills.
To keep it simple didn't consider mass transfered to energy or the actual weight of each floor's contents nor the weight of the floor's construction. Still its a rough guess. Once the first floor joist support failed the next lower floor had roughly a 860,000 lb load (860,000/2000) or 440 tons, when it was rated to carry only 14 tons. What do you think happens when a handful of 2 inch diameter bolts that held up the floors had that much weight?
The official version doesn't state which floor first failed. Lets say the 90th floor. That means the weight of the remaining 19 floors above it plus the 90th floor plus the plane (300,000 lb + {20 x 28,000} = 560,000 lb ) were now in motion, getting pulled straight down by gravity with each floor below in turn adding roughly another 14 tons or 28,000 lbs. That's one hell of a object in motion to stop and it just mushroomed in weight with each floor.
@KungFriedChicken Oh please... why you "know" about science would fit in a thimble. Newton's Three Laws of Motion actually confirm the official version. Namely an object in motion (first floor that gave way) will remain in motion unless opposed by a greater force.
Lets consider that for a moment. Each floor had a rated load of 14 tons. Add just the weight of the plane 300,000 lbs and its a wonder the impact floor held up for as long as it did.
@willieofroanoke 'unless opposed by a greater force' and that being the larger bottom bit.. the ground floor can quite easily hold the weight of every floor. Easiest way would be to show us your theory with a model to demonstate it.
these truther,or whatever,they call themselfs,are the same people that are living in a tent at the park on our tax dollars,a,quarter of which,are on food stamps,the other 3forse on beer stamps!
@KungFriedChicken stop trying to play junior detective, every question has been answered hundreds, if not thousands of times already by the real experts, not "truther" wannabe types. There's no need for complex, convoluted nonsense. Two planes flew into WTC. Fuel spills out, catches fire. This soften metal. One floor support gives way, exterior wall bows outward, floor on one end now free starts to fall, starts chain reaction, results in pancake inplosion. End of story.
@rickykeith78 The only ones claiming the steel melted are "truther' morons. The jet fuel fires softened the metal enough to weaken it to the point the floor joist supports and bolts hoding them up lost about half their strength which was enough to start the chain reaction that brought the building down.
This has been flagged as spam show
If you set aside the time to experience 'Tuesday Morning in September'.. You may come away from it..changed in some way. If you treat it like disaster porn, then you get nothing. That is one of the main reason it is on DVD. It is distinctly different from anything that day- to this day.. However, you will never know by handling it like footage. . It is not mere footage. It is an experience that stands alone from that day that needs no intro, and or overdubbed narration. By itself it stands
TuesdayMorningInSept 5 hours ago
i don´t know if there was a comercial aeroplane. But i´m sure that there was special effects on tv images. I´m sure that the goverment is back
the attack.
quemundodios1 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is an upload on my channel of an over two hour video of the wtc attacks, that was not released for nearly a decade. It is the most complete account in real time that has ever surfaced.
tusmorninginsept 4 days ago
whts with the happy music lol
chrisp11699 1 week ago 2
@chrisp11699 I keep getting asked that! I got it from a friend. If it has a name I don't have a clue. It is probably German. If you want a copy drop me a PM with a email address.
willieofroanoke 1 week ago
@willieofroanoke lol but y would he put happy music for a sad event lol never make friends pic out the music for your video
chrisp11699 4 days ago
I would say the tire could also be from the 2nd black/grey military plane that had no windows and no emblems on it like the eyewittnesses on the streets told us in the live interviews.
So i go with radiusmag2.
And we can consider that explosives were used too, cuz Nist Report didn`t check the debris for explosives or radioactivity (thermonuclar demolition). They only mentioned that there theoretical were no explosives and refused to test it.
So if there is no proof, there is no truth.
SuperYesyesyo 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NON-conspiracy 130 minute real-time WTC Attack video chronicle. Upload is on my channel. Something NEW from that day. 130 minutes of never before seen - continuous running account. (most complete known ) Authentic; pristine; uncensored. It is 9/11 as it was that day for most everyone outside of Ground Zero. Please take the time to listen/watch the over two hour authentic rarity. It is not disaster pornography. It transcends so much of what has been released from that day. It is on DVD.
tusmorninginsept 1 week ago
well were are the plane parts from the pentagon?
lgrashiid 1 week ago 2
@lgrashiid many were on the lawn. Open you eyes.
willieofroanoke 1 week ago
@lgrashiid @ THE WTC LOL
MrJACKS0N2010 2 days ago
have any of you retards ever seen the 9 ton turbo fan jet engines on a boeing jetliner so much larger than the police tape shot size reference in this. take a look at JASSM footy here on skrewtoob.dont forget the rollsroyce engine fans are ceramic composites they cant burn.media programmed hypnovictims all of you idiots.
radiusmag2 1 week ago
@radiusmag2 Idiot are YOU, if you expect jet engine remain intact after going thru 200+ foot building.
ssmusic214 2 days ago
it's quite interesting, the steel melted but aluminium body of the plane remains.
progrocky 1 week ago 2
@progrocky I must have said at least 30 times nobody EXCEPT the "truthers" fools claim that the steel melted. There are or used to be, haven't looked in a long time, several very detailed fact filled videos on the web. The two best done by National Geographic and Popular Mechanics. If they're still up on their site, (both run about an hour) watch them and you just might learn something.
willieofroanoke 1 week ago
@progrocky the steel didnt melt if it did people who in there would die from the intense heat
radiax120 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well. Find every thing so you can build a new play a a tower?
MoveBoy756 1 week ago
Comment removed
MoveBoy756 1 week ago
Excellent video. Solid proof of commercial planes in the wreckage. However, it doesn't disprove all of the "truther" theories, such as the most convincing imo, of the drone technology. I mean you no disrespect. I love my country. Generations of my family have fought and defended it. However, I urge you to watch the video below and to research project northwoods, along with "dancing israelis 9/11"
/watch?v=5XPEz0d1rWI
jm112012 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is an upload on my channel of an over two hour video of the wtc attacks, that was not released for nearly a decade.
tusmorninginsept911 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if interested in a rarity, (From 9/11/2001) There are essentially two DVDs from 9/11. FROM 9/11.. One is a production from French filmakers that gives us the experience through the firemen, police, and emergency workers at Ground Zero. The other, is not a production: 'Tuesday Morning in September', captures the essence; the spirit, the heart, of most everyone outside of Ground Zero that day, by an American. (both top shelf) There is a preview of the 130 min DVD on my channel.
Supersynapsis 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if interested in a rarity, (From 9/11/2001) There are essentially two DVDs from 9/11. FROM 9/11.. One is a production from French filmakers that gives us the experience through the firemen, police, and emergency workers at Ground Zero. The other, is not a production: 'Tuesday Morning in September', captures the essence; the spirit, the heart, of most everyone outside of Ground Zero that day, by an American. (both top shelf) There is a preview of the 130 min DVD on my channel.
TuesdayMorningInSept 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For a perspective outside of Ground Zero on 9/11/2001, please watch: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day that was not released for nearly a decade. It is something from that day, that is not a production, but is an authentic continuous running chronicle of the 911 wtc attacks. You can preview the entire 130 minute account.. on my channel.
TuesdayMorningInSept 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only continuous TWO HOUR VIDEO of the 9/11 wtc attacks that is known to exist: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day you have NOT seen. You may have seen other posts about it on Youtube. It is not like so much other crap that has been put out since 9/11; it is not a propaganda, and or opinion piece. It has no fair comparison with anything. It is 9/11 like you have never seen. Please preview the 130 min chronicle. There is an upload on my channel
tusmorninginsept 3 weeks ago
not a jet engine at all...proves the point really that it is just garbage planted
007lamario 3 weeks ago
316Bh you are either stupid as a stump, are under some spell, or you are part of the group that perpetrated this mass murder and you are a part of the false flag core...Fuck off Jack ass... the truth is obvious
007lamario 3 weeks ago
no evidence can convince conspiracists. they will probably say that it's a fake wheel. they believe what they want to believe, facts and logic don't stand in their way.
bellijklh 3 weeks ago
Are you idiot? They said that fire made steel soft and thats why WTC collapsed. How on earth survived plane parts? They are made from aluminium. Plane tire hasn't burned. There should be plane wings not engine and tires (Aluminium melts at 660 C and steel 1530 C) . Tires are inside of plane during the flight. And number one question is how on earth aluminium plane cuts through the concrete and steel? Have you seen plane crash test?
ReameesMiku 3 weeks ago
@ReameesMiku You are such stupid Eurotrash I don't think anybody wants to take the time to explain this to you.
ArTofPvT 2 weeks ago
@ReameesMiku I guess I am idiot.
IdentifiableUser 2 weeks ago
@WILLIEOFROANOKE. Thanks for calling me stupid nice way to make your point! and I'm the moron LOL. Anyway, I was just making an observation. God bless the US that allows moron like us have a discussion on things we don't know. It's ok to ask questions that is how we find answers. BTW I love the you're asking questions.. yeah, "how can someone plant an aircraft engine in the street on NYC?" can someone help WILLIEOFROANOKE? HE NEEDS ANSWERS TOO
316BH 3 weeks ago
Man, so much information out here that is confusing but the pic of the mangled plane turbine you put up does not showed any sign of fire and it looks rusted. Stop posting false information!
316BH 3 weeks ago
@316BH Were you born stupid, or did you have to work at it? I'm so sick of clods pretending that isn't the "right" engine. Well doofus, explain how anyone could get ANY aircraft engine planted in the middle of the street at the height of morning rush hour in a major city like NewYork and nobody sees them doing it. I know none of you morons will even try to answer. LOL!
willieofroanoke 3 weeks ago 10
@willieofroanoke Keep in mind that the internet is full of idiots and dolts that will argue anything. You will never "convince" insane people of anything. Also, Islamic terrorists watch these videos and will post comments to try to shift the blame from the people responsible. I see these type comments from Islamic scum attacking Jews nearly everyday on Nazi Holocaust videos.
clintonearlwalker 3 weeks ago
@willieofroanoke Thank you for posting these pictures. Unlike the idiots here who haven't a clue or shred of proof of a conspiracy, I am a NYC commuter, work for the US DOJ, and was there on Tuesday Sept 11. The engine part at 0.55 I saw first hand and took a photo with a disposable camera. It came from the 2nd plane. It landed on Church & Chambers St. It took off the top corner off 100 Church St before landing here. If I could upload my photos in comments I would. The CIA didn't put it there.
henrynevins 2 weeks ago 6
@henrynevins
Thanks. Both Popular Mechanics and National Geographic have done excellent pieces that blow up all the silly "truther" nonsense. They both get shown on tv on the cable channels once in awhile while I haven't checked in awhile used to be on their respective web sites also use to be on Youtube, maybe still is.
willieofroanoke 2 weeks ago
@willieofroanoke It is my hope that you're making some kind of profit out of insulting everyone the challenges your opinion. Calling a person stupid does not prove anything but shows what you are.
316BH 2 weeks ago
@316BH
After answering thousands of times and never getting nothing but the same stupid slop back from the "truther" mob, what do you expect?
willieofroanoke 2 weeks ago
@316BH How stupid can you be really?
irlittleboii 2 weeks ago
@irlittleboii Wow! is the all you have to said? At least write something constructive or are you unable to formulate an opinion on the subject. I made an observation whether it's right or wrong is beside the point. Please think prior to posting such a plain comment it shows your lack cognitive ability.
316BH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe that the planes hit. I believe there is no way in hell those building free fall fell the way they did if there were not explosives installed in the towers. People that are afraid can make fun of people like me. There is so much more to this than what you saw on TV. Why do you think the government is trying to get control of the internet now? Also how do you know those photo's are legit did you take them? What about building 7 falling? I feel we were lied to in a huge way!
truthseeker840 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
truthseeker840 4 weeks ago
Congratulations, you found some props and a dinky missile engine. Even if these parts were from those planes, 1) where’s the rest of the wreckage, fixtures, luggage, bodies, etc. 2) Professional/military pilots have testified on record that a) it’s impossible to fly passenger jets 400+ mph at sea level and b) it’s impossible for anyone, let alone amateurs who couldn’t control a Cessna, to hit buildings with such precision. Planes may have been hijacked but they sure weren’t flown into buildings
tonoklein 1 month ago
@tonoklein
you are the biggest idiot in the world. 1) The rest of the wreckage is buried and moved around. IT WAS SCATTERED AS THE 110 STORY BUILDING COLLAPSED. 2) It wasn't at sea level and it is possible to control a plane with such precision. You have no proof of their speed or their flying experience.
You're a typical "truther"
duralate 4 weeks ago
@duralate Yea what do those silly pilots and veterans know. The WTC wasn't at sea level??? lol
So was the wreckage at the Pentagon and Shanksville scattered as the buildings collapsed too? Look at every video and picture of the supposed crash scenes you want, you will find one single, small engine and enough parts to fit in a pickup truck... no raging fires... all evidence of a missile, not a 80-100 ton jetliner... and NO tail section, fixtures, luggage, bodies... NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY.
tonoklein 4 weeks ago
@tonoklein
no bodies, but body parts were discovered. I believe a man was returned his wife's ring from her dismember hand that was discovered among the rubble. Her name was Ruth McCourt. She had been on one of the planes with her 4 year-old daughter.
My dad's co-worker was there in NY that day. He heard a plane and saw a plane.
KeltasNTB 3 weeks ago
@duralate "the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots..." NASA Senior Executive Dwain Deets
You have no proof of how much proof I have or how much investigation I've done.
But hey just keep believing the Muslim conspiracy theory the Feds and corporate media spoon feed you. I"ll take the pilots, veterans, engineers, eyewitnesses, etc
tonoklein 4 weeks ago
This video is a lie. Everyone knows the plane parts were planted by evil invisible aliens who worship satan.
MazJax 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
After you take the time to discover what this chronicle is.. you may want to share it with others. It is the only realtime chronicle, that captures the essence of what those outside of Ground Zero, were experiencing that day. There are other videos that in part do the same, but none as complete, and variegated as this one: 'Tuesday Morning in September'.
TuesdayMorningInSept 1 month ago
but the planes parts not!!!!!!!!!!!!
almao2006 1 month ago
YES
they also find the PASSEPORT of AHMED ATTA
almao2006 1 month ago
except they found no pieces of the plane that hit the ground.... just a hole... lol ... and 0 videos of any of it... come the fuck on...
MrRaptur3 1 month ago
That crazy how did those things survive that horrible horrible morning
prodigygamerxx 1 month ago
if i were behind the conspiracy I'd use plains , way too much info to gain , and creates plausible deniability , just because plains were used does not deny a gov conspiracy no matter what you believe , its f'd up period and lets hope the laws passed since dont take advantage of us law abiders
toob247 1 month ago
It's seems credible that planes did strike the WTC that day but the way those buildings came down...pulverized. That's just way to strange and the small amount of rubble left in ground zero.Plus you'd figure many of these things would have melted if the fire was hot enough to melt steel.
TheIronman4891 1 month ago
that theory of there being no planes is really stupid, but there are a lot of things that still don't add up about that day, like the pentagon and WTC7 ect
GoodnightSeptember 1 month ago
People that search for the "TRUTH" won´t take 2 seconds to listen to anything else than THEIR TRUTH.
It´s like asking one of these religious dipshits that beliefe the earth is a few thousand years old, why we find bones of dinosaures today, of animals that weren´t mentioned anywhere in the bibel.
"Because god PUT THEM THERE, to test our faith."
k1dicarus 1 month ago 8
@k1dicarus Sadly true. The "truther" movement is mainly a bunch of brainwashed dummies that are certain what happened on 911 didn't happen the way it happened. Can they prove what they believe and that it happened some other way? Heck no, but they are damn sure it didn't happen the way most people think. LOL!
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke Thebest part is that you get a different story depending on who you talk to! I have met truthers from a wide range of theories! Some tend to believe it was terrorist attacks, but think the government was involved, or set it up, all the way to extreme, no planes, everyone is a government sheep!. What an extreme insult to the victims families. "an alluminum plane cant enter a steel building!" it's called force and energy fuck tards! look it up!!!! nice video BTW.
Ryan198416 4 weeks ago
@k1dicarus
Yes you have right!!!!
They also found the PASSPORT of Ahmed Atta!!!!
almao2006 1 month ago
@almao2006 And the passport was placed. There is no other way.
Pawel84Pawel 1 month ago
@k1dicarus
For starters, it's Bible! not bibel. Who's the d------?
germie33 1 week ago
Most people who believe 9-11 was an inside job don't rebut that Planes hit the building. They claim the far more believable conspiracy. The conspiracy that elite entities inside the homeland security department had prior knowledge of the attack and did everything in their power to maximize its affects and to make sure the attacks were completed. So to most conspiracy theorists this video means absolutely nothing. Good try. However you may have convinced a few people to slide their rose colore
SupperStu72 1 month ago 3
@SupperStu72 There was no Homland Secuirty before 911.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@SupperStu72 you talkin so much you didint even spell color right beleive that
Sizzlenash 1 month ago
@Sizzlenash you mean "colour"?
riotguards 1 month ago
The bomb is planted....boooom....terrorist wins! haha, These parts of plains are planted like the explosives inside to the towers. Moron, listen the audio of 1º Chief of firemans, he said he need 2 units to end the flames of fire. after that, somebody blow that tower.
davideoballes 1 month ago
@davideoballes You so damn dumb you don't even know the difference between planes and plains. Oh, you are just a typical ignorant "truther" nitwit.
You buffoons have any idea how much explosives it would take to "blow" two 110 story buildings each that weight over 1/2 billion pounds not counting contents?
willieofroanoke 1 month ago 3
@willieofroanoke . dude give the guy a break... he spelt with the wrong 'plane' you have made mistakes. If people who know the truth are called 'truthers' people - such as your self - must be called liars... "you buffoons have any idea how much explosives it would take to 'blow' two 110 story buildings each that weight over 1/2 billion pounds not counting contents"? .... do you have any idea on how two planes can knock down three buildings....
randomtrader1 1 month ago
@randomtrader1 I know how 2 planes can knock down 3 buildings.
They crash into the buildings and weaken the structure, and then melt steel from burning fuel. This causes things above it to lose support and fall down.
OBVIOUSLY when the upper floors come crashing down it will bring the rest of the building down too, because there is a lot of weight coming down.
duralate 4 weeks ago
@willieofroanoke A nuke 50 meter under wtc 1/2/7. Im from Germany/Poland and I know it.
Underground nuclear explosion would make it all. The hot, and the dust fron all that 1/2 billion pounds steel.
And no, its not fuel that made steel 6 week after 9/11 lightning hot...
Pawel84Pawel 1 month ago
@Pawel84Pawel
IT was not an underground nuke.
The lower floors were mostly unaffected by the blast, yet the upper floors were.
duralate 4 weeks ago
@willieofroanoke Yes, its correct to find plane parts, that are real planse or placed parts. Doesn't matter. Fact is, planes or fire form kerosin did not melt steel. A nuke fron down under does.
Dont you felt ground shaking before tower colapsing?
Pawel84Pawel 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke ....... 0 explosives .... only few gallons aircraft fuel
zx10devil 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke
Yeah,
a small underground nuke to
create a cavity for all of the debris to fill into...
Silverstein gets 70 billion in terrorist insurance claim
just after new lease with Rockefellers...
hmmm....
jjmstick 3 weeks ago
we should play some russian roullett of blind following trust in a government or following search for truth even we need looads of bullets may this discustion will end then
Strugler1987 1 month ago
@Strugler1987 Search for the truth on how many "truthers" are ignorant, dumb and simply kooks. Bullets? You just confirmed my observations.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@Strugler1987 Let's cut funding for NPR and PBS. They are government controlled media that deliver the "official story." Right?
masterhalco 1 month ago
say what is that sound track.
churupaca1 1 month ago
Just look up New World Order...thats what they are trying to achieve not prove
eoddatsme 1 month ago
what are you trying to prove?
JayyPeeBS 1 month ago
@JayyPeeBS There is NO basis to anything so-called "truthers" keep saying. Nothing. Just look back at all the crap they've suggested. Holograms, doctored tv footage, bombs, planted explosives, missles, drone planes, the government ploting, killing civilians, etc..
NONE of that kind of crap has a scrap of proof. Just crazy half-ass fringe crackpots running their mouths.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
bldg 7?
SaintsFro 1 month ago
ya, people will still, say the stuff was placed there or something stupid like that. but thank you for putting this vid on.
aj0446 1 month ago
Wow...why does the engine and tire look so small for a commercial airliner??? I mean have you stood at an airport looking at the size of the engines and tires ? If anything youare raising more questions. Everybody wants this event to fade away like the Kennedy assasinations but it won't...EVER! Concrete and steel do not turn to dust from burning jet fuel, scientifically impossible.
djcolourzone 1 month ago
@djcolourzone Yeh, the engine looks like from a private jet...too small on a b767 they are 2mt in diameter,this one is long like a st sign. Less than 1 mt??? the tyres would be squashed even if they "survived" the collapse of a building on top of them...and the windows look like not burned at all except some. I mean after all that every part of the plane should be "dust".
txtdrivers 1 month ago
@txtdrivers Even the parts at the pentangon were insignificant. the way it penetrated all the way to the inner ring suggests a bunker buster not an aluminum commercial plane. Yup we're just crazy iiliterate bastards....LOL !!! Common sense...just common sense !
djcolourzone 1 month ago
The fool known as KungFriedChicken is now history, he obviously only wants to troll, so he/she/it is blocked. Say bye-bye to this idiot.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken That comment from some idiot that goes by KungFriedChicken.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke No it did not, that is an absolute lie! Once again there will be no evidence to support this other than somones testimonial. Building 7 had no major impact damage after the towers collapse, and you only need to look at all the other WTC building inbetween the towers and building 7 to see the massive impact damage they recieved, yet they certainly did not implode, because it is impossible without explosives. Study the laws of motion you mind numbingly silly man.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
Rubber tyres survived the fire? Hmm...
rikisuave 1 month ago
@rikisuave ONE or TWO tires survived. You dummies have any idea how many tires are on a commerical jet?
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke So what is your major problem little willy? You simply cannot stand to see people stop and think about things, it infuriates you to the core. How dare they use independent thinking. You're holding onto a lot of inner anger and bitterness. Don't let self pride weigh your life down, the smart thing to do, is ask for help. Be Smart!
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Problem? What problem? As long as you and other clueless trolls come here looking for an ass kicking, I'll give you one.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke 2 set of 4 in the back (8) and 2 in front. So if a set of 4 from the back falls they all fall together considering if the landing gear was down before impact which is most unlikely because they go down under a certain speed. A low speed less than 200 knots!!! and I don't believe they slow down the plane in that situation to extend the landing gear.
txtdrivers 1 month ago
@txtdrivers To land where??? So the landing gear was still inside and if there was so much heat to melt the steel structure of the building there was enough heat to melt the rubber those windows left and everything else considering the whole plane went inside the building like a hot knife in the butter. wake up boy.
txtdrivers 1 month ago
pan pipes are so soothing dont you think?
TheThebounty 1 month ago
These plane parts could have been from any number of accidents. Some of those plane parts do not even match the make and model of the plane.
tobynixon 1 month ago
If the govt was involved in any way, the planes would have missed the buildings or got lost
toonsis 1 month ago
I will I agree with what someone said to me once.. and that it is not good for kids to read and believe they can not trust the U.S government, its bad for the safety and security of all citizens as a whole, to believe there was ever an inside job.
Personally, I just hope to raise awareness of the possibility of it, and have people expectant to judge things using their own independent thought, rather than being scared of the current childish name calling control technique that is too boring.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
So all truthers are idiots simply because we perceive that the whole story isn't being told?? And we have the guts to ask questions! I tell you what! All you who do not question the official story, please continue your ways if you want all that any of us who have questions ask is that you don't treat us like shit! I mean all humans are not wired the same! We will all have different opinions about things! Hopes, fears, and dreams will all be different. The day that changes ,we're no longer human!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion I for one appreciate variety! I simply hate ignorant and rude behaviour! We are all neighbors! If you don't wish to be respectful to others then why don't you go ahead and commit suicide and do the world a favor already! Cause you are no better than the terrorists, politicians, and fundamentalist idiots out there who would kill someone because of his race or religion!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion The whole story is NEVER told, the public couldn't handle the whole truth. You think that's news? What if anything the sad events of 911 showed was how ill prepared the country's government and military were for a surprise attack, just like they weren't when Perl Harbor happened. That does not suggest something kooks keep suggesting happened. HAARP technology? Put the comic book down.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke The comic book? LOL! Now thats funny! Thats the best one I've heard yet! And Pearl Harbor didn't just happen. Roosevelt came out years later and said that he as much as knew that Pearl Harbor was gonna happen! And whether or not he knew and didn't stop it or knew because he was part of the planning doesn't matter to me! He still allowed it to happen and alot of good people died that day! My Grandpa Gwynn was there and was lucky to be alive!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion and it isn't the public that couldn't handle the news but instead the government who is too chicken shit to tell the truth and possibly give up what they have to better mankind instead of continuing their greed and lust after money, control etc. H.A.A.R.P is real, G.W.E.N towers are real. Even though I know about these things it doesn't empower me! I am still as vulnerable as you or anyone else! But at least when they take over I'll know what hit me!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke I'd hate to interfere but what is the name of the music, good sir?
tyrannasaurasalan 1 month ago
@tyrannasaurasalan
This is funny in the sense several people have wrote a comment or sent a PM they really hate this "song" and others like you and me actually like it. The truth is this... I have no idea what the true name of this is. It was sent to me by a friend that lives in Germany many years ago.
So if you and others like it, send me a PM with a valid email and I'll email you a copy as a wav file attachment.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion
Cont 1
The public is brainwashed. Movies like Fail Safe that pretend that NORAD and SAC are watching the skies and will immediately swoop into action within seconds is BULLSHIT! The fact is on 911 NORAD had to be called on the phone by FAA controllers and tell those numbnuts that the WTC had been hit twice. Even after being told they had no orders to respond! All that happened initially was two fighter jets, both unarmed flew out
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke What is the movie Fail Safe?? Haven't seen it! I used to be a good all american kid, I served my country proudly! Until one day I blew out my knee and the military treated me like a third class nobody, wouldn't fix my knee even though it happened on active duty! I was upset! Wanted to know how they could get away with not doing right by their soldiers! So I started to study! And the more I learned about how the world really works the sicker I became!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion Fail-safe is an excellent movie made back at the height of the cold war. I highly recommend it. It stars Henry Fonda as president, Water Matthau, Larry Hackman that later had the J R Ewing role on Dallas. It mostly happens at NORAD when a squad of fighters on an exercise get a "go signal" and proceed into Russian Air space planning to drop nukes on Moscow. If they suceed, Fonda offers to nuke New York to prevent WWIII. Riviting.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion
Cont 1
I watch it every time it comes on tv. It is one of the those movies you can switch channels on. You have to watch, even knowing what happens. The plot is a morality play. Should the president give the order to help the Russians shoot down are own planes? How will the military respond. If one bomber gets through should the president give the order to nuke New York or go all out and try to wipe out the Russians. Note I didn't say how it ends.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion
Cont 2
It is way better than today phony action movies. A real sit on the edge of you chair drama. As the squad of fighters each get shot down with our help, will the Russians listen to us when it gets down to 2 plane one a decoy or won't they trust us? Will the wife of the last pilot be able to talk her husband into turning back? Will the president be able to? Correction. Were bombers, not fighters. Also can't switch channels. I type too fast. LOL!
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke I have come to a point in my life now where I no longer want retribution for my past problems! I no longer am angry about everything, though some points still tip my scale! I simply want to learn all that I can! I pray all the time that Almighty God guide my hands during my research and He shows me many hidden things! I have eyes to see and ears to hear! He has pulled the veil away from my eyes that I might come up out of this Mystery Babalon! No longer fooled!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@TheConshuscriterion
Cont 2
To their fail safe point, about 200 miles East over the ocean! Getting them orders to turn around and actually head towards New York and later DC tooks some frantic phone calls. No, the news media didn't talk much about that.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken I still believe it was Thermite charges set up weeks in advance, with a toggle switch that would only trigger at certain vibrational frequencies. Such as those caused by Acoustic Electromagnetic Pulse weapons from a satellite in space! Do you also remember that there was a hurricane just off the coast that day that never made it to shore much less got a mention in the news!? Hurricane Erin! Only H.A.A.R.P technology could've kept the storm literally at bay!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
name of the song, my good man?
tyrannasaurasalan 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
Cont 1
What every quack 911 theorist forgets is the initial rupture, spilling of jet fuel from the plane's engines is only the IGNITION point. It is the building contents much very flamable that causes much of the damage.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Again you confirm you're nothing but a full blown fuckwit.
Ever see a car fire up close, I did. Turned out to be my neighbor. He happened to leave for work about five minutes ahead of me. I go down the same road. I see smoke. Gets thicker as I get closer. Time I'm there his car is fully involved smoke at least 100 feet in air, flames over the roof of car, then boom the gas tank explodes. That's only 20 gallons or so of gas. Were talking 10,000 gal per WTC.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken What you are guility of is constantly blubbering that the planes crashing into the WTC couldn't be the cause of the buildings coming down. You keep yelling that explosives MUST be the cause yet you never even try to explain how. The bottom line is if it was explosives and I'm just humoring you, why any planes added, they're then not needed, right? You're just talking shit.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke Man you talk so much shit its not funny.. the planes served nothing more than shock and awe.. the tempretures you talk about to weaken the steal would cause all humans to instantly combust just from the radiant heat alone, yet many humans are visually still alive on the very same floors. Your theory is impossible to recreate using physical modelling, my theory is not. simple as that. All they had to do was check out all the steel but they would not allow it!
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke but no no man, all you need is 20'000 U.S gallons (worlds smallest gallon) , and that has enough power to knock down 3 skyscrapers and pulverize the 260 odd floors worth of building material all the way down into a small pile of rubble sitting on its former footprint.. yup its natural for things to fall like this hey bud :)
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken The TWC towers were each 110 stories, you got them up to 130. See why you get laughed at?
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke you forget building 7 was 47 storeys dipshit.. can you see how people laugh at you, not with you.. See Bud, we don't expect you to realise your stupidity, because you're stupid, but we care about you.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken We were talking the 10k gallons of fuel in one building. Nice how now you add the second building, so the observer of the debate calculates 5k gallons per building, when in reality if you add the second building, we are talking about 20,000 gallons. Caught you again Chris Angel making 15,000 gallons of fuel disappear. That's diversion tactic #4. Now about your pots and pans theory, There were an estimated 156500 kitchen fires from the source I found in 2002.
5uspended4nimation 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken No, You are NOT using my logic, Your misdirection tactic # 3 caught again. You have used a evasive reply tactic without addressing your statement that 10000 gallons of jet fuel is "relatively little" . You still will not acknowledge when this "burns off" the fire does not go out, whereas thousands of tons materials continues to burn. There was more in those buildings than just steel and concrete. This is not the Flintstones. We are done here.
5uspended4nimation 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken I'm no engineer and don't claim to be an expert, but I did have to read some of N.I.S.T.'s report for a paper on contributing architectual factors/flaws. Their conclusions are all cited, not leaps of logic or assumption. There are some strange anomalies but the magnitude of the relationship of forces unleashed negate much of how we assume materials should behave. Steel only has to reach 50% of it's melting point to lose 70% integrity, for instance
Danarchistic1 1 month ago
@Danarchistic1 but the nist report never explained the complete collapse of WTC 1 n 2... they stop after their first explaination of a floor slip and just assume they all kept falling like dominos at free fall speed. Nist report was delayed, underfunded and massively incomplete. and they most definately did not follow standard procedures. The report is probably the worlds worst recorded investigation.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken I can tell you, I'm no cheerleader for the government and I'm not gullible. I'd be willing to read other credible studies. Are any available? I simply haven't seen anything more convincing than NIST. I've only seen youtube videos that, of course, just come off silly.
Danarchistic1 1 month ago
@Danarchistic1 well the easy thing to do was investigate all the steal. Its the only way. But they did not even allow the investigation to begin until the steel was shipped off to china to be recycled. That alone should tell you this investigation is a joke. Even to come up with the theory they did come up with would require all the steel to be investigated but they didnt do that remember. Nist report is nothing more than a theory that is impossible to demonstrate with modelling.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
Comment removed
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@Danarchistic1 Somebody prove the official theory with modelling. No theory is relevant without modelling to demonstrate the possibility of it happening. So when was this modelling done to come up with the theory they have?.. Answer is, they never have and never will show the public the required physical modelling, only provide endless windbag dribbles of crap, that you will not truly comprehend, but it sounds good enough, and you only offer a worthless patriotic view point.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@Danarchistic1 I did not mean you're worthless that did not sound good hehe, I meant the report is worthless, with an impossible theory to replicate with scale modelling, so your appreciation and support of the report is nothing more than a patriotic view point that has no real worth.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
What does some dope like you think hit the WTC? You are aware EACH of the 4 planes were being tracked by FAA radar, well maybe you're too stupid to know that.
I bet you still believe in Santa Clauses, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.
Care to explain what turning off transponders, not responders you idiot, has to do with ditching at sea? I bet the average cucumber has a higher IQ then you do.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke The point is it is impossible for the planes to be the reason the buildings completely imploded the way they did, the whole idea of the planes being holograms is pointless nonsense. Real or not real planes, it is most definately not the cause of the buildings complete collapse. However, your question does highlight how easily fooled you are by what you see on television. A plan hits the building and the building falls down means it must be the reason huh.. yeah to a dumbass
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Ok stick to your goofy story. You now need to explain how dozens of every day people with their cameras and video cameras caught the exact same impact and aftermath we saw "faked" on tv. So go ahead. Tell us how that works.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Have you ever heard of Telemetry? There is an episode of "The Lone Gunmen" a subsequent spinoff of the X-Files where a planes controls were taken over by the government and the plane was to be flown into the WTC! The Lone Gunmen overrode the controls at the last minute and saved the day however this tv show was filmed years before 9/11/01. It is a known fact that planes as big as 747s have been flown by telemetry same as Predator drones are flown now!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Just food for thought and a different perspective! However I saw a recent video from Japanese news about how, after a rainstorm occurred, they used the mist afterwards to produce a hologram to make it appear as if a whole city was there when in fact it was not! So Holography isn't out of the spectrum! Project Blue Beam from the Air Force is working in conjunction with H.A.A.R.P to produce effects of holography coupled with 'sounds' to accomodate the hologram!
TheConshuscriterion 1 month ago
Comment removed
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
Comment removed
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Have. Its' 170. Which got to bet 3 times what yours is.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@78931jjs This keeps going in circles. If not planes, then explain where the people on the four jets are now. Funny how "truthers" always dodge that simple question.
Those 266 passangers and crew were real people. Many security cameras capture many of them boarding, going through security. If not dead, where are they? Dead cold silence from the "truther" nitwits.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
I don't get it, it was a fake bag of plane parts that the nation watched live as it crashed into the building? God thing they got it right on the first try. Also, retard Dana if the tire is down on the ground not in the burning building how is it supposed to burn? Think about what you guys say before posting dumb shit that makes no sense. Really I see no plane? WTF do you expect from one that just crashed into a building at 500mph.
megolem 1 month ago
@megolem I was one that also watched live tv as events unfolded. Truther idioticy has no bounds. Bin landen WANTED the world to be watching. After the 1st plane hit he knew every freaking tv network in the world would be picking up live feed from cameras trained on the WTC. So about 20 minutes later, bang! Second plane slams into WTC.
Fake video? The event was captured on dozens of video cameras taped by average everyday citizens. Guess what, their sequences line up perfectly.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@megolem
Some early "truther" Ace Baker, a goofy looking shoulder length hair hippie and part time musician was one of the first kooks to scream what we saw on tv was faked. He's also on record saying the FBI or CIA rounded up the 266 passenger and crew, flew them to a "secret" military base and murdered them. He also claims all the moon landings were faked. This doofus also tried to fake his own sucide on live radio, where, yeah you hear a gun shot. Typical truther moron.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
The jet fuel didn't have to melt the steel. The horizontal joists got hot enough to sag. That sag created immense stored kinetic energy where they joined the verticle beams. When those joints eventually let go and released that energy, it was almost like another explosion. Those plane fragments probably blew straight through and weren't inside long enough to melt.
Danarchistic1 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Look at it this way,,,if you can. You dump 12 ounces of lighter fluid on your mattress and light it. It will burn your house down. You are telling me 10000 gallons of jet fuel is a "relatively small volume of fuel" and cannot ignite a building. You sir, can dump your "drive by" partial "truth" somewhere else
5uspended4nimation 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Have you considered begging to be admitted to the nearest mental hospital? Try it.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
fake ta rasss !!!just fookin dooosch maun!!1
kiaganga 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
Cont 3
What I just explained is more than enough to defeat any "truther" bullshit. Nothing in the way of missles, bombs or explosives are needed to explained why the towers came down due to a pancake implosion simply due to the weight. Once the first floor failed it started an impossible to stop chain reaction, Confirmed by Newton's first law of motion.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke
Cont 4
I actually addresses this in another of my videos titled "WTC Reality Check" Start at the 42 second mark. At about 55 seconds you see a close up of the puny size of the boths that held up the floors. You expect a handful of bolts that size already weakened from the first to cary a nearly a million pound load? Remember that weight increases by roughly 14 tons with each lower floor. Wake up!
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke So you're saying there is a third world like building code in the usa, and their shyscrapers in themajor cities are a serious danger to public safety.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
I'm saying an object that weighs around a million pounds and actually gets heavier has it falls and gains new mass is an unstopable object. That object was the first fire floor to fail and all the floors above it. So what do you do, babble about third world fire codes. You're beyond pathetic in your "reasoning" skills.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
Cont 2
To keep it simple didn't consider mass transfered to energy or the actual weight of each floor's contents nor the weight of the floor's construction. Still its a rough guess. Once the first floor joist support failed the next lower floor had roughly a 860,000 lb load (860,000/2000) or 440 tons, when it was rated to carry only 14 tons. What do you think happens when a handful of 2 inch diameter bolts that held up the floors had that much weight?
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken
Cont 1
The official version doesn't state which floor first failed. Lets say the 90th floor. That means the weight of the remaining 19 floors above it plus the 90th floor plus the plane (300,000 lb + {20 x 28,000} = 560,000 lb ) were now in motion, getting pulled straight down by gravity with each floor below in turn adding roughly another 14 tons or 28,000 lbs. That's one hell of a object in motion to stop and it just mushroomed in weight with each floor.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken Oh please... why you "know" about science would fit in a thimble. Newton's Three Laws of Motion actually confirm the official version. Namely an object in motion (first floor that gave way) will remain in motion unless opposed by a greater force.
Lets consider that for a moment. Each floor had a rated load of 14 tons. Add just the weight of the plane 300,000 lbs and its a wonder the impact floor held up for as long as it did.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke wdf who gives ashit
kiaganga 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke 'unless opposed by a greater force' and that being the larger bottom bit.. the ground floor can quite easily hold the weight of every floor. Easiest way would be to show us your theory with a model to demonstate it.
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago
these truther,or whatever,they call themselfs,are the same people that are living in a tent at the park on our tax dollars,a,quarter of which,are on food stamps,the other 3forse on beer stamps!
242ls88 1 month ago
@KungFriedChicken stop trying to play junior detective, every question has been answered hundreds, if not thousands of times already by the real experts, not "truther" wannabe types. There's no need for complex, convoluted nonsense. Two planes flew into WTC. Fuel spills out, catches fire. This soften metal. One floor support gives way, exterior wall bows outward, floor on one end now free starts to fall, starts chain reaction, results in pancake inplosion. End of story.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
ok the jet fuel melted the towers steel that made it fall but the planes wheel was ok?
rickykeith78 1 month ago 2
@rickykeith78 The only ones claiming the steel melted are "truther' morons. The jet fuel fires softened the metal enough to weaken it to the point the floor joist supports and bolts hoding them up lost about half their strength which was enough to start the chain reaction that brought the building down.
willieofroanoke 1 month ago
@willieofroanoke yep..and when ten thousand gallons of jet fuel burns off, they believe the fire magically goes out.
5uspended4nimation 1 month ago