its because finch tunes there guitars a half step down and the song is not meant to be played in that tuning so nate had to sing lower which made the song sound a lot different then the original and potentially sound like shit....i agree finch was a good band and but this cover is bad.
I really like Finch, but this is a horrible cover, I just watched their Jimmy Kimmel performance, and it was the same thing, very bad! Good song, good band, bad cover.
@Tapicero111 you must have the golden asshole of a seven year old then, cause nate is the shit and finch was one of the sickest post hardcore bands ever.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
good song but whom ever was holding the camera sucked much dick while filming this.....unless the singer has a huge ego theres no reason for the camera to follow him and only him on stage...especially while the bridge is being played......EPIC FAIL!
This is the best Hum cover I've seen yet. Incredible job! They tuned down to E flat, which is what you do when your singer is more comfortable a little lower.
does anyone have finch's cover of "mayonaise" by smashing pumpkins? they played it back in 2004 i think, it rocked pretty good.
dolphins2383 2 months ago
great!!!! finch rockz!
nate is the best!!!
cjh12able 3 months ago
I'm a fan of Finch but I think the cover is off...Nate was singing way too nasally.
WarlockAshlii 6 months ago
I agree with lenny
JangoM1 9 months ago
I appreciate the effort, but they should not be playing this cover in public.
lennybrucelee 9 months ago in playlist It's Full Of Stars!
are they back together?
chaceurs 11 months ago
finch is fucking horrid. anyone with a semblance of taste already knows that though.
agricola 11 months ago
They are playing the wrong chords...the F#/D after the initial G isn't being voiced...let the flaming begin.
hampsterman22 11 months ago
sorry, but nothing beats the original...HUM forever.
wizzlewizzie 1 year ago 9
Musically they do the song justice, but I agree the vocals are questionable.
IamthegreatTippy 1 year ago
I dig the music, but the vocals leave a lot to be desired.
talefromthepit 1 year ago
its because finch tunes there guitars a half step down and the song is not meant to be played in that tuning so nate had to sing lower which made the song sound a lot different then the original and potentially sound like shit....i agree finch was a good band and but this cover is bad.
thebeeve24 1 year ago
I really like Finch, but this is a horrible cover, I just watched their Jimmy Kimmel performance, and it was the same thing, very bad! Good song, good band, bad cover.
treph75 1 year ago
@treph75 do you dislike hum, or just the way they portrayed this song?
johnpcarterful 9 months ago
@johnpcarterful I like Hum fine, I just think this was a bad cover of the song, it sounds really off, in terms of poor execution.
treph75 8 months ago
Damn.. Wanted a studio version bad.. R.I.P. - Finch
Hated19134 1 year ago
Posers
rnrdemon 1 year ago
nice remake. hooky-yet, 'theirs'
BADMOUTHSTEAL117 1 year ago
this is the fucking worst band in the world fuck these wannabees...guy cant even sing sounds like my asshole when i fart
Tapicero111 1 year ago
@Tapicero111 you must have the golden asshole of a seven year old then, cause nate is the shit and finch was one of the sickest post hardcore bands ever.
alphaguitar2 1 year ago
@Tapicero111
you must be an asshole.
finch is one of the best. . .
go suck your moms dick.
ilovecheesecake100 1 year ago
this would be awesome on meth !
stybarrow 1 year ago
yeah.pretty bad,but it's just the sound.in a studio,they would pull it off.just not as well as the original.
willsworthy 1 year ago
Great song by a Great band. This is an okay cover by an okay band. Vocals suck! Do yourselves a favor and only listen to Hum play this song.
humpuppets 1 year ago
disgraceful... i agree @suttonsantin
christpuncher98 1 year ago
Is there any un-live versions?
socomXpert1 1 year ago
I just threw up in my mouth.
SuttonSantiniPaulo 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
good song but whom ever was holding the camera sucked much dick while filming this.....unless the singer has a huge ego theres no reason for the camera to follow him and only him on stage...especially while the bridge is being played......EPIC FAIL!
MelMelsNRich 1 year ago
This is the best Hum cover I've seen yet. Incredible job! They tuned down to E flat, which is what you do when your singer is more comfortable a little lower.
theskifreek 1 year ago
pretty good, but still can't match up to Hum's live
ToyFlameThrower 1 year ago
man hes either playing it way off or they are in some odd tuning which they prolly are....either way still sounds pretty sweet.
nathantim 1 year ago
very good..
horriblito 2 years ago
great!!!!!
ayumiiiiiiiiii 2 years ago
cooool
mishgantuman 2 years ago
My favorite band covering my second favorite band =D
rayman121212 2 years ago
awesomenessss
lilycakes 2 years ago
that´s great...!!!
wabi182 2 years ago