as this story revolves around the deceipt of a woman singer impersonating a man who can, as a woman impersonator sing such high notes that he blows all other female impersonators out of the water I really don't think it works with anyone who can't perform that trick...Julie could do it just, with some pre-recorded help, in 1995, but surely Liza couldn't, and Julie's other replacement, Rachel Welch never hit any notes at all...might be fun with Chenoweth though :-)
If I were Liza's mgr, I wouldn't have let her do this number. It's dreadful! JA puts her to shame. Loss had her good performances, but this isn't one of them!
liza is just wonderful. the song was written for julies range and the changed it up for liza both are wonderful julie has a better range but lizas dancing is far better
Please stop comparing Julie and Liza. I love them both but they are different from each other. Yes they are both GREAT AND ENORMOUSLY TALENTED why can't people just accept that. Liza did her best during this run. please remember that she filled in for Julie because this is an extremely taxing show and the lady needed a break. Love 2:20-2:30 best part ever.
NOOOOOOOOOO ! I can't believe Liza butchered this number !! BRING JULIE BACK ! No offense to Liza Minnelli or anything, she's usually pretty fabulous herself but COME ON !!!! No one can replace Julie Andrews in this !! NO ONE ! ...so disappointed.
I think that the score is fabulous, in the movie, but somehow the score did not translate well to the Broadway stage. I saw Julie on in the run;it was clear she was suffering vocally but still gave it her all. Well I can't claim to have seen her in "MFL" or "Camelot" but she still was quite wonderful in this incongruous melange that the Broadway show was. The movie was spectacular. James Gardner and Preston were major reasons for this!!!
I played KING MARCHAN in a regional production - absolutely HATED every moment of it. Watched this video just to relive the horror....and the fact that I am NOT a huge Liza Minnelli fan. I humbly eat crow. Ms. Minnelli turned in a FINE job of doing this Dog's Dinner of a score - especially considering that this was a vehicle created for Julie Andrews. Maybe that's why I hated it - "my" Victoria was neither Ms. Andrews...or, now I HAVE to say, Ms. Minnelli.
Liza really brought her own to this... I love julie but I love the way the tempo was changed from julies version... after the the guy sang liza kept the same beat going... julie slowed it down a bit too much...Liza liza liza! But love you too julie x
Seeing this makes me want to see the show. I never had wanted before....and has anyone else noticed the end.... She removes the head dress and she looks like a man but notice the Prosthetics on her temples... I Now see how thats possible especially given the plot. Watch it closely I thinks its really cool how she really does change her persona with that thing on... really looks like a man! Strange.
When I saw Liza twice in VV, she was fabulous. Don't believe all of the negative press. The musical was lacking, but she took the audience's breath away!
She's a marvellous dancer. She's mesmerizing as always. I agree with a couple of the posts that said the arrangements lagged and were unexciting---what a shame, and I can see that even from this clip. Why did they wheel her offstage, then on again? To take away the most interesting performer for a dull dance extension...then bring her back once the doldrums are beginning..? It's so nice someone posted this. thanks.
Liza is clearly the type for this role and does a great job...another classic performance from a legend and too bad the leading man was threatened by her talent...what is his name? Bravo Liza!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This show was not meant to come to the stage. The adaptation was dull and slow. It should have remained a film. I saw Julie, Raquel and Liza and none of them could elevate the show to an exciting level, because the show was inherently mediocre.
You're soooo right. I love love LOVE Julie, and always will... but she was past her vocal prime when she did the Broadway version. Most of the songs were re-written to a lower key to accomodate her. And the show was mediocre thru no fault of her own.
Yes, fascinating to make the inevitable Julie/Liza comparison.
I hesitate to say it, but I don't think this particular arrangement of the song shows either off to her best advantage. Now if you want PERFECTION, you watch Julie in the original. She is the most appealing and talented entertainer of all time. Past, present and future. imHo, of course...;)
That is just one of the laws of the universe like gravity or procreation.
@charlexington "The most appealing and talented entertainer of all time, past present and future" isn't Ms Julie Andrews, or ANY broadway star for that matter, iMHo. Numerous other soprano, tenor, baritone, mezzo, bass, contralto, stage actor/actress of the past century TRUMP over all of them. At any time
Thank you for posting this. Much better than I thought it would be and what it was "reputed" to be. Shows ya, gotta see it for yourself. Can't believe everything you read, eh? Grazie.
Just like to say thank's for uploading this clip. I never got to see this show on Broadway with either artistes, it looks wonderful. Both are amazing performer's in their own right and even to this day ,with their physical difficulties, they could knock the socks off many so called "talents" out there. The chorus are truly amazing. I have never seen dancer's in London show's give what Broadway dancer's do............wonderful!!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Y'all are fools, Liza was made for a role like this Julie Andrews is holesome and can't dance! that's why her choreo is SO EASY! Haha Liza sells a number like this, Julie trys, but was made for Sound of Music-BORING. the role was created for Julie which makes it so bleh, Liza brings out the seedy desperate part of Victor/Victoria, which is what makes the role come alive. PEACE
Julie hates being called wholesome. She has had that label forever for her role as Mary Poppins and her performance in the Sound of Music. She's a lot balsier than you think.
I agree! I still think she's AWESOME, even today, when she can't be as physical. But if you seek out her 1981 New Orleans video (sometimes on DVD on Ebay) you can see her dancing and stretching those legs as far as the sky! If you had put THAT Liza into Victor/Victoria then this clip would have melted YouTube down!
To my mind, Julie and Liza are totally different artists. Julie is the trained musician, the subtle comedian of well cultivated British humour. Liza is the natural singer, the well trained dancer, and full of charisma. I love them both, but I must say Julie's singing pleases me more, although Liza's belting reminds me of her mama. :o)
Liza's Victor/Victoria is Sally Bowles all grown up. Julie is majestic and understated in her performance of this. Liza did a good job, but it was same old same old. Julie made Victoria 3d. Thanks for posting this; it's fascinating. I never thought I'd have the good fortune to be able to compare the two performance. Keep up the good work :)
as this story revolves around the deceipt of a woman singer impersonating a man who can, as a woman impersonator sing such high notes that he blows all other female impersonators out of the water I really don't think it works with anyone who can't perform that trick...Julie could do it just, with some pre-recorded help, in 1995, but surely Liza couldn't, and Julie's other replacement, Rachel Welch never hit any notes at all...might be fun with Chenoweth though :-)
Dirkdebruyne 1 month ago
If I were Liza's mgr, I wouldn't have let her do this number. It's dreadful! JA puts her to shame. Loss had her good performances, but this isn't one of them!
coaching71 3 months ago
I like Liza, but compared to Julie Andrews, this version sucks!
coaching71 3 months ago
liza is just wonderful. the song was written for julies range and the changed it up for liza both are wonderful julie has a better range but lizas dancing is far better
MrFrankangelo 6 months ago
liza is great in everything she does. Was the rest of the broadway show filmed. If so please put it on youtube please. Thankyou
lschtupak 8 months ago
Its true that Julie Andrews did it great. But Liza is also great.
lschtupak 9 months ago
Please stop comparing Julie and Liza. I love them both but they are different from each other. Yes they are both GREAT AND ENORMOUSLY TALENTED why can't people just accept that. Liza did her best during this run. please remember that she filled in for Julie because this is an extremely taxing show and the lady needed a break. Love 2:20-2:30 best part ever.
strawberrycurrant 1 year ago
@strawberrycurrant Actually she filled in for Julie because Julie became very sick and required surgery and hasn't been able to sing since.
emmadilemmasings 11 months ago
@emmadilemmasings yes I do know that too.
strawberrycurrant 10 months ago
Liza is a Idol, and she is great, but I need to say it; Julie is the best Victor/ia, so androgynous, so hot... Julie
NIXNOSFERATUS 1 year ago
i like it, but i'm stil waiting de high note at the end.
soylakekagalindo 1 year ago
This was a scary experience. I now going to watch Julie Andres sing it.....since she owns this song!
LivingMindfully1975 1 year ago
@LivingMindfully1975 You're so right *_*
gill099 1 year ago
This is horrible. Why did Liza agree to be a part of this production?
sugarshula64 1 year ago
I saw her in this she was horrible beyond words and I love liza
redbsh 1 year ago 2
NOOOOOOOOOO ! I can't believe Liza butchered this number !! BRING JULIE BACK ! No offense to Liza Minnelli or anything, she's usually pretty fabulous herself but COME ON !!!! No one can replace Julie Andrews in this !! NO ONE ! ...so disappointed.
Kiyraesyn 1 year ago
Liza looks great and sounds magnificent...sorry but no way could Julie compare to the soulful Liza..Bravo Minnelli!!!
bradly2007 1 year ago
@bradly2007 Oh Lord. You're twisted. I love Liza so much, but better than Julie ?
JessicaVictification 1 year ago
Liza would have been amazing in this had is been 1977 and not 1997... Cocaine can do some nasty things to you
Evilqueen1985 2 years ago
As much as I like Liza she's pretty bad in this.Why she agreed to do it is a mystry .
glawsny 2 years ago
Really awful. especially when she's wheeled out so the real dancers can take over and then comes back to "climax" the number. Poor in all ways.
von8lou 2 years ago
Liza is great here. Shes a much better dancer
AJROELANT 2 years ago 2
Brava Liza for making the role yours. Such an attractive guy!
greeklawyer2002 2 years ago
I think that the score is fabulous, in the movie, but somehow the score did not translate well to the Broadway stage. I saw Julie on in the run;it was clear she was suffering vocally but still gave it her all. Well I can't claim to have seen her in "MFL" or "Camelot" but she still was quite wonderful in this incongruous melange that the Broadway show was. The movie was spectacular. James Gardner and Preston were major reasons for this!!!
damone77 2 years ago
this is the first clip (for me) where vocally, she has sounded almost identical to Judy.
I actually had the window minimized and thought for a second that it WAS Judy.
uncc1223 2 years ago
ya she was definitely the daughter who got the voice.
SwanofHollywood 2 years ago
I played KING MARCHAN in a regional production - absolutely HATED every moment of it. Watched this video just to relive the horror....and the fact that I am NOT a huge Liza Minnelli fan. I humbly eat crow. Ms. Minnelli turned in a FINE job of doing this Dog's Dinner of a score - especially considering that this was a vehicle created for Julie Andrews. Maybe that's why I hated it - "my" Victoria was neither Ms. Andrews...or, now I HAVE to say, Ms. Minnelli.
macraeman 2 years ago
I think she is very good I mean not as great as Julie but still she is amazing, She Is FREAKING LIZA!
emanuelrp 2 years ago
defenitley not as polished as Ms. Andrews
BwayBound16 2 years ago 8
well, liza a much more spontaneous performer and julie is more refined.
dudewheresmydignity 2 years ago
They both had the same surgery
rosekelly 2 years ago
OMG EW!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO COMPARING Julie is WAY BETTER then this CRAP!!!!!
LeahQT 3 years ago
then ending wasnt much of a vocal range show off!! though i still love her!
katmeow4 3 years ago
THE GREATEST LIVING ENTERTAINER
ktmeinyc 3 years ago
Man does chick SUCK compared to Julie
epsilonjb 3 years ago
i could not agree more!
Elphaboy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Man, this SUCKS compared to Julie Andrews! Liza is a Washed up, drugged up, liquored up tart! Please people...listen to both again!
epsilonjb 3 years ago
i like julie better than Liza..JULIE RULES
BrazilianItalianGirl 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She sings this better than Julie, it's more suited for her voice.
BrazilNemoFish 3 years ago
Liza really brought her own to this... I love julie but I love the way the tempo was changed from julies version... after the the guy sang liza kept the same beat going... julie slowed it down a bit too much...Liza liza liza! But love you too julie x
rosekelly 3 years ago
WOW!
Seeing this makes me want to see the show. I never had wanted before....and has anyone else noticed the end.... She removes the head dress and she looks like a man but notice the Prosthetics on her temples... I Now see how thats possible especially given the plot. Watch it closely I thinks its really cool how she really does change her persona with that thing on... really looks like a man! Strange.
barry30312 3 years ago
Liza¨s a real dancer... much better than julie guys!!!!!
Amazing !!! the fosse style marvellous !
She¨s a complete artist!!!!!!
vikjet46 3 years ago
When I saw Liza twice in VV, she was fabulous. Don't believe all of the negative press. The musical was lacking, but she took the audience's breath away!
lizzysecondstreet 3 years ago
She's a marvellous dancer. She's mesmerizing as always. I agree with a couple of the posts that said the arrangements lagged and were unexciting---what a shame, and I can see that even from this clip. Why did they wheel her offstage, then on again? To take away the most interesting performer for a dull dance extension...then bring her back once the doldrums are beginning..? It's so nice someone posted this. thanks.
sisalrug 3 years ago 2
Liza is clearly the type for this role and does a great job...another classic performance from a legend and too bad the leading man was threatened by her talent...what is his name? Bravo Liza!!!
bradly2007 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This show was not meant to come to the stage. The adaptation was dull and slow. It should have remained a film. I saw Julie, Raquel and Liza and none of them could elevate the show to an exciting level, because the show was inherently mediocre.
Buddycaporotta 4 years ago
You're soooo right. I love love LOVE Julie, and always will... but she was past her vocal prime when she did the Broadway version. Most of the songs were re-written to a lower key to accomodate her. And the show was mediocre thru no fault of her own.
Kaileo1 3 years ago
Yes, fascinating to make the inevitable Julie/Liza comparison.
I hesitate to say it, but I don't think this particular arrangement of the song shows either off to her best advantage. Now if you want PERFECTION, you watch Julie in the original. She is the most appealing and talented entertainer of all time. Past, present and future. imHo, of course...;)
That is just one of the laws of the universe like gravity or procreation.
charlexington 4 years ago 10
@charlexington Your words are like music for me XD
gill099 1 year ago
@charlexington "The most appealing and talented entertainer of all time, past present and future" isn't Ms Julie Andrews, or ANY broadway star for that matter, iMHo. Numerous other soprano, tenor, baritone, mezzo, bass, contralto, stage actor/actress of the past century TRUMP over all of them. At any time
AOG93 1 year ago
Thank you for posting this. Much better than I thought it would be and what it was "reputed" to be. Shows ya, gotta see it for yourself. Can't believe everything you read, eh? Grazie.
Montavanni 4 years ago
Just like to say thank's for uploading this clip. I never got to see this show on Broadway with either artistes, it looks wonderful. Both are amazing performer's in their own right and even to this day ,with their physical difficulties, they could knock the socks off many so called "talents" out there. The chorus are truly amazing. I have never seen dancer's in London show's give what Broadway dancer's do............wonderful!!!!!
kissmequick8 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Y'all are fools, Liza was made for a role like this Julie Andrews is holesome and can't dance! that's why her choreo is SO EASY! Haha Liza sells a number like this, Julie trys, but was made for Sound of Music-BORING. the role was created for Julie which makes it so bleh, Liza brings out the seedy desperate part of Victor/Victoria, which is what makes the role come alive. PEACE
btothefloflo 4 years ago
Julie hates being called wholesome. She has had that label forever for her role as Mary Poppins and her performance in the Sound of Music. She's a lot balsier than you think.
ShamusMacGuffin 4 years ago
Julie is the only reason why a broadway production was even MADE because of her role in the MOVIE!!!! DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LeahQT 3 years ago 4
of course julie does it better..
the same would happen if they put julie to perform sally bowles.
lecopop 4 years ago
great comment! i agree.
Mario54World 3 years ago
I agree! I still think she's AWESOME, even today, when she can't be as physical. But if you seek out her 1981 New Orleans video (sometimes on DVD on Ebay) you can see her dancing and stretching those legs as far as the sky! If you had put THAT Liza into Victor/Victoria then this clip would have melted YouTube down!
sugar240682 4 years ago
Great video. I just was wondering who was the jazz singer and do you have the entire footage of him and the song?
luca2966 5 years ago
THE CHORUS DANCERS ARE AWESOME!!!!
Yvabelle 5 years ago
To my mind, Julie and Liza are totally different artists. Julie is the trained musician, the subtle comedian of well cultivated British humour. Liza is the natural singer, the well trained dancer, and full of charisma. I love them both, but I must say Julie's singing pleases me more, although Liza's belting reminds me of her mama. :o)
AlbyFC 5 years ago 3
Liza's Victor/Victoria is Sally Bowles all grown up. Julie is majestic and understated in her performance of this. Liza did a good job, but it was same old same old. Julie made Victoria 3d. Thanks for posting this; it's fascinating. I never thought I'd have the good fortune to be able to compare the two performance. Keep up the good work :)
tangobaby 5 years ago
I do have Julie's version on DVD. But Liza makes it even sexier! A little CABARET touch to le Jazz Hot. That was AWESOME!
gamesport88 5 years ago
liza better than julie by far. The dance steps were changed by Liza....more Fosse. Better by far I'LL SAY!
rosekelly 5 years ago
Really Julie Andrews is the best! No one can compare to her. But Liza sang quite well too.
XxHengxX 5 years ago
Didn't Liza break a hip during this show?
dexterville 5 years ago
not that i know of. she had her first hip surgery prior to this show.
this was the show that caused her to have vocal cord surgery.
rayray0779 5 years ago
no the vocal cord surgery was Julie not Liza
LeahQT 3 years ago 2
Nah, she didn't get hurt. Had a full healthy run while Julie Andrews was on vacation.
chocolatesouljah 5 years ago