I never claimed to know jack-scwat about algae. Just making an observation about how much of an hassle it seems to be, and therefore not cost efficient. Where as hemp is VERY cost efficient, because of all the superior product derived from it.
Hey, 20,000 gal. per acre per year seems like a lot of oil. But from what got out of this vid, it ain't here yet. Think it's something like $33 per gallon...DOH!!!
@Aegis5461, u r the retard, u do know this, right?
@55rebels you're fuckin retarded... all i hear is hemp hemp hemp.. i'm willing to bet you dont understand an iota of chemistry.. idk what it is about weed that makes everyone an activist
"idk what it is about weed that makes everyone an activist"
@Aegis5461 Probably because of fuck-tards like you, that don't have a clue as to the usefulness of one the most useful plants on planet earth, and therefore support the war on it.
"i'm willing to bet you dont understand an iota of chemistry"
And you just made it blatantly obvious that you know a whole LOT less.
Just stooping down to your level, so maybe you can understand a little clearer.
@enticed2zeitgeist It depends on what they do with the patents. If they patent it then sit on the technology then I agree with you. If they patent it and make that patent publicly available then I'm all for it. Otherwise, without that patent, someone else could just patent it and sit on it like an oil company.
@enticed2zeitgeist I honestly don't know how the whole patent process works. You might be right. Would you want to risk it though? I'm for any process that guarantees it's public availability.
@Ahlywog I'm not 100% confident either. My understanding though is the information is released into the public domain before the knowledge is patented it is considered public property. Which means no one can really make copious amounts of money on it, which is good for the public which is what the world needs right now.
Greed is destroying the planet and this kind of system could liberate man kind from energy enslavement.
@enticed2zeitgeist Agreed. I do know that Tesla patented a lot of his inventions and made those patents publicly available. Not meaning to tout Tesla but you get my point. Protecting the publicly availability of the information should be crucial IMHO.
This has been flagged as spam show
I never claimed to know jack-scwat about algae. Just making an observation about how much of an hassle it seems to be, and therefore not cost efficient. Where as hemp is VERY cost efficient, because of all the superior product derived from it.
Hey, 20,000 gal. per acre per year seems like a lot of oil. But from what got out of this vid, it ain't here yet. Think it's something like $33 per gallon...DOH!!!
@Aegis5461, u r the retard, u do know this, right?
55rebels 2 months ago
Comment removed
55rebels 2 months ago
to use such monotonous techniques is completely useless. Speed it up its algae not a deadly virus, good use of GLP but no GLP's needed.
Mcarman81 3 months ago
20,000 gallons per acre per year is hardly a little bit
MrDutchjohn 4 months ago
Seems like a whole lot of hassle, for just a little bit of oil.
I believe hemp would be more practical. Not only do you get oil from the hemp plant, but also textiles, food and medicine.
55rebels 4 months ago
@55rebels you're fuckin retarded... all i hear is hemp hemp hemp.. i'm willing to bet you dont understand an iota of chemistry.. idk what it is about weed that makes everyone an activist
Aegis5461 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"idk what it is about weed that makes everyone an activist"
@Aegis5461 Probably because of fuck-tards like you, that don't have a clue as to the usefulness of one the most useful plants on planet earth, and therefore support the war on it.
"i'm willing to bet you dont understand an iota of chemistry"
And you just made it blatantly obvious that you know a whole LOT less.
Just stooping down to your level, so maybe you can understand a little clearer.
Your joke...
55rebels 2 months ago
Bleh, patents...
enticed2zeitgeist 5 months ago
@enticed2zeitgeist It depends on what they do with the patents. If they patent it then sit on the technology then I agree with you. If they patent it and make that patent publicly available then I'm all for it. Otherwise, without that patent, someone else could just patent it and sit on it like an oil company.
Ahlywog 5 months ago
@Ahlywog They can also just declare it public knowledge can't they?
enticed2zeitgeist 5 months ago
@enticed2zeitgeist I honestly don't know how the whole patent process works. You might be right. Would you want to risk it though? I'm for any process that guarantees it's public availability.
Ahlywog 5 months ago
@Ahlywog I'm not 100% confident either. My understanding though is the information is released into the public domain before the knowledge is patented it is considered public property. Which means no one can really make copious amounts of money on it, which is good for the public which is what the world needs right now.
Greed is destroying the planet and this kind of system could liberate man kind from energy enslavement.
enticed2zeitgeist 5 months ago
@enticed2zeitgeist Agreed. I do know that Tesla patented a lot of his inventions and made those patents publicly available. Not meaning to tout Tesla but you get my point. Protecting the publicly availability of the information should be crucial IMHO.
Ahlywog 5 months ago
@Ahlywog Tout Tesla all you want man! He was a true hero.
enticed2zeitgeist 5 months ago