WEARECHANGE COLORADO - OFFICIAL MURDER STATEMENT.

[AaronfromWM]

Why do they call them sheep? it makes no sense, i dont get it?!

[dsglop]

You interviewed nathan too?

[911TRUTHINATOR]

lol.

[XSeveredManX]

Is that all you have to say? lol

[EdgemanLL2]

ROFPMSL

[jastheswift2]

watch?v=fkH5450Krvs

don't be afraid edgeman- this short video is not about the doctored footage shown on 911.

you should learn to make judgments about a given video i post AFTER viewing the video, not before.

[EdgemanLL2]

Jas. YT vids are not academic sources.

Do be afraid to do REAL research. You know, like the normal people do?

Tell me again, Jas, how if ot looks like Jesus is in your burrito, he really MUST be? Tell me again how if a cloud looks like a Duck, it really is a duck.

Dont be afraid Jas. Just admit it. Youre happy America got attacked and want it attacked again.

Thats why you make such pathetic, shithead excuses to get Alqueda off the hook.

[jastheswift2]

"Jas. YT vids are not academic sources."

"watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM&feature=c­hannel_page

TV fakery morons busted."

using your reasoning, this video, which does a poor job refuting the notion that footage on 911 was doctored, is invalid as a source for debunking. but since it supports the official story of 911, this "YT vid" is a good source to use.

this sort of contradiction is rampant among those who have swallowed the official story of 911.

[jastheswift2]

"Dont be afraid Jas. Just admit it. Youre happy America got attacked and want it attacked again.

Thats why you make such pathetic, shithead excuses to get Alqueda off the hook."

weak and delusional comments. look up "911 bluescreen," and the "911 amateur" series. your swallowing of the official story of 911 should not prevent you from looking into these videos. finding one utube video that does a poor job refuting the notion that footage was doctored on 911 is deficient debunking on your part.

[911TRUTHINATOR]

simone shack now says all 911 footage is fake, lmao!

[jastheswift2]

watch?v=wpkqomUc7Xs

something to think about

[EdgemanLL2]

Dont change the subject Jas, just admit it.

Dont be afraid. We all know its true.

After all, why do you continue to peddle the LIE that you know is a lie?

[jastheswift2]

"After all, why do you continue to peddle the LIE that you know is a lie?"

the notion that footage was doctored on 911 is not a lie. since you have swallowed the official story of 911, you are afraid to examine the footage, with such footage being the means through which the story of 911 was spread. you make up "standards" to avoid looking at damning evidence, then point to a utube vid (YT vid are not academic sources, right?) that does little to refute the notion that footage was doctored.

[EdgemanLL2]

he notion that footage was doctored on 911 is not a lie.""

sure it is. Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying.

If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where and how it was produced.

Achmed, answer the question. Why do you lie? What do YOU get out of it?

[jastheswift2]

"If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where..."

if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know WHO used it to know that it was in fact used.

"Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying."

what kind of a "smashing" results in you blocking me? answer: a delusional one.

look up "bluescreen assassins" for your "who, what, when, where and how it was produced." i forgot: YT vids are not "academic sources."

your excuses are pathetic.

[EdgemanLL2]

JasQaeda "if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know""

Yes you DO need to know. Because if you cant prove who, what, when, where and HOW, then you dont KNOW a blue screen was used. youd just be guessing.

Come on Achmed. Youll need to do better that this if you want the 72 virgins.

And tell me again how if I see Jesus in a burrito, it must REALLY be true, just because it looks like it.

Ive always loved that one.

[jastheswift2]

"Because if you cant prove who, what, when, where and HOW, then you dont KNOW a blue screen was used. youd just be guessing."

watch?v=6pGD6U004fA

-the who, what, etc.

you can't complain that this video is not an "academic source" when you used another utube video in trying to refute the notion that footage was faked. you can either refute the claims made in "bluescreen assassins" or in other videos that prove footage was faked, or you can pathetically howl about your standards.

[jastheswift2]

watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM

is this a valid source?

[jastheswift2]

"If its not a lie, youd be able to submit proof of exactly who, what, when, where..."

if bluescreen was used, i don't need to know WHO used it to know that it was in fact used.

"Youve been smashed so many times on it, you know youre lying."

what kind of a "smashing" results in you blocking me? answer: a delusional one.

look up "bluescreen assassins" for your "who, what, when, where and how it was produced." i forgot: YT vids are not "academic sources."

your excuses are pathetic.

[jastheswift2]

watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM

is this video a valid, academic source?

(make sure you see the video before making a judgment on it.)

[Organjic]

So where exactly was this Obama rally?

[AnimalPlanetSFC7]

HAHAHAHA

[Horjan]

LOL, I laughed so hard, I was expecting something serious, and then this sheep came. I love sheep

[wallyboy1978]

lol

[01psd]

LOL

[AbleDangerUndercover]

Did someone here say they deliberately cheated their taxes? No need to fear, the IRS is here!

[KimmoKuopio]

The irony is, people who DONT believe there was a massive government conspiracy are labelled as sheeple, when in reality its the muppets that swallow everything loose change says that need to wake up. Anyone who believes that the evil bush was involved with this is as daft as he is. He cant tie his own shoes.....

[philbiker3]

Bwaaah ha ha ha ha this is even better than Troy's lampoon.

[SlimeBuster]

LOL!!

[usgop]

LOL!! That's exactly what everything they say sounds like!!

[mgsfan15]

And they call us, sheeple.