The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning.... And, even since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate a free inquiry? The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded.
But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will soon find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your legs and hands, and fly into your face and eyes.
I would say the sad thing is that she is missing out on the joy of spirital fellowship, joyful songs and also hopes to seek guidance when there is trouble in her life. I would hate to find that there is no God, because then there would be no after life or hope for our future. But the positive things I find about atheist, sometimes I find them to be more like Christians than so called Christains as some of them are corrupted in their true faith.
God is real and his son Jesus died for you so you could end up in heaven. Jesus is coming back very soon to take back his people to heaven. please repent im begging you. Don't say you havn't been warned if you read :)
@craqqer You're wasting your life trying to push this insane nonsense on people. Human cultures around the world are waking up to the obvious fact that religions are BUSINESSES made to CONTROL you and take your resources from you. Please grow out of your fantasies and join the rest of us in the 21st century. The world is going to keep moving forward, with or without you. Please adopt rationality and reason, I'm begging you. Don't say you haven't been warned! :)
@shizmaneat "One of the things that is wrong with religion is that it teaches us to be satisfied with answers which are not really answers at all." Richard Dawkins
"I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world." Richard Dawkins
@mickipedia God doesn't stop holding us in existence just because we choose to live life without any objective moral foundation. Jeffrey Dahmer was quite happy murdering and turning his victims into sex zombies. Your self worth and value to society isn't measured by your own opinion of your self. There's nothing to doubt anymore. Jesus never doubted God's existence it was whether suffering crucifiction was God's WILL for him that was a temporary concern. Learn how to prove.
@shizzleman8 If you think the bible is a book that provides an "Objective moral foundation" you are seriously misinformed. There isn't hardly a bible scholar or a denomination of Christianity that agrees with any other about what is and isn't moral. The bible explicitly endorses, slavery, rape, war, incest, and pretty much every other vice you can come up with. If you get your morals from the bible I am deeply concerned that you are working with 11th century barbaric morals.
@AliburX Calls for speculation. Why does making a conditional statement about my thinking represent an objectional offense? Because I don't have to tell you what I'm thinking and even if I did tell you how would you know I was right or telling you the truth? You can't know, I could be misinforming you.
Love your neighbor as yourself is the Golden Rule, the sum of all wisdom and a perfect objective moral foundation that anyone who practices it can't fail. The key is objectivity. & Love.
@AliburX That's kind of the only thing I follow from the Bible. Just love people the best you can, there's no law against it. There's a cool video here from one of my favorite teachers/professors Anthony Campolo (tony) Red letter Christians. RonSafreed and his comment about the lady in Russia led me to a page for a broadcasting company in Canada that was featuring it. Tony's written a lot of good books and focuses on being a light to the hurting and poor of the world. Hang in there.
@DancinFool3456 Does it matter? Yes, bible scholars agree and disagree on almost every interpretation made by other scholars, individuals, preachers, anyone. They are as inconsistent in the way they think as any two human beings anywhere. The real point is that I've read the bible and it is a flagrantly immoral book. The fact that so many so called believers use it an interpret it to fit their own purposes is just an argument against the idea that there is some kind of objective standard.
@DancinFool3456 Perhaps you can explain some things to me then. Why is it that there are some Christians that believe in the death penalty, and some that don't? Why is it there are some Christians that believe in abortion, and some that don't? Why is it that it is now OK for a women to work and be held as an equal to a man, when for thousands of years the Christian morality led people to subjugate women? An objective system would be consistent, there is no consistency here.
@AliburX So you don't think that Christians should disagree about anything? Or is it that you misunderstand the whole concept of the objective basis for morality? You see to be confusing specific laws given to the ancient Hebrews with the idea that a belief in God is the basis for an objective morality.
@DancinFool3456 No, you are rationalizing away the inconsistencies in your belief system. An objective moral system that was ordained by god, would not change all the time. Yes, I think if you are claiming you have a source for morals that is consistent, understandable, and practically applicable in any way, then everyone who adopts that system would have the same moral code. I've read the bible. It is CLEARLY NOT REAL. Geeze, please grow up.
@AliburX Riiiight.! As if the differences between particular religions nullified the idea that the existence of God creates an objective morality. Any inconsistency can be explained by the inability or unwillingness of humans to accept aspects of divine morality. The evolution of that morality is a fine tuning of human morality to the divine.
But what hope do we have of coming to an understanding of this when you are unable to accept the existence of history that supports the Bible?
@DancinFool3456 Rationalize away the nonsense all you like. I have studied the history that supports the bible and it's nearly non-existent. You have been brainwashed, pure and simple. Your god is a fantasy creation of MEN. I've gone to church, I did the research, there is nothing there. There is as much historical evidence supporting the bible as there is supporting the Illiad. I get that you take it very seriously, but you're really just playing dungeons and dragons... God's gunna gitcha!
@DancinFool3456 LMAO. Love when people use my own insults against me. Too funny. Hey man, you're the one that believes in an invisible, non-substantial, ill-defined, non-existent boogie man in the sky. I was just specifically recommending you consider outgrowing your imaginary friend. The fact that you take offense when people question your imaginary superman, just indicates you don't really buy it any more than I do. Why does god need you to defend anything? Too funny.
@DancinFool3456 Let's see, what backup do I need to prove a fantasy is a fantasy. Hmm, a complete absence of any empirical, verifiable, objective evidence of actual existence WHATSOEVER. There ya go. Have you ever considered that had you just been born somewhere else, or at some other time, you'd just be believing in the god flavor of the month? Zeus, Allah, Ra, thousands of others... Do you believe in them all? Where is your proof for the non-existence of every god ever conceived of?
@AliburX You have made assertions which pretend to accurately characterize Christianity. I want see some scholarly support for those assertions. So far you have provided nothing more than poorly informed opinions.
You should at least provide some semblance of an argument rather than relying entirely upon rhetorical flourish. Have you ever considered that if you had been born with a brain that you might have figured that out by now?
@DancinFool3456 What assertions have I made? I make 1 assertion. I do not think the Christian god is real at all. I make the exact same assertion about Harry Potter, Zeus, Odin... Haven't we been over this? Your god is no more real than any other. It is your job to prove that your superman exists. You're the one telling me to believe in fairy tales and fantasy. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE you numbskull. I told you, I've read the bible, Lee Strobel, Craig, you, NONE of you have ANYTHING AT ALL. LOL
@AliburX quoting you "The bible explicitly endorses, slavery, rape, war, incest, and pretty much every other vice you can come up with." I contend that this assertion is baloney. care to back it up?
quoting you again " The real point is that I've read the bible and it is a flagrantly immoral book"
What is the basis for this? By what standard of morality do you make such a comment?
@DancinFool3456 If you've read the bible, you know it's there. If you haven't, buy a bible or google all those terms with "bible". If you want to attack me personally over and over without presenting ANYTHING and then attempt to draw me into an argument over the content of your fairy tales, that's not going to happen. How do you tell the difference between fantasy and reality? I think I've been clear on my standards, objective, verifiable, REAL evidence. You have nothing.
@DancinFool3456 I will allow the truth of the fact that THE BIBLE IS A FLAGRANTLY IMMORAL BOOK FULL OF FAIRY TALES. Stand for itself. I'm not here to prove anything. I'm here to share that I have been actively pursuing knowledge on this subject and some kind of rational reason to believe this nonsense, and I can't find it. Can you provide it? Are you just so offended that I think demons, angels, gods, cloud cities, underground lairs, sounds like dungeons and dragons to me? Why?
@AliburX So you are an ignorant coward with no intellectual integrity whatsoever, Now THAT is a personal attack, however true. What I did previously was to attack your assertions. I has assumed even a brain dead bigot like you can tell the difference, now I know better. You demand one standard for believers in God and another for yourself. You pretend to be superior by demanding I provide "verifiable" proof for the existence of God , yet refuse to provide proof for your claims.Typical
@AliburX I agree with the golden rule 100%. The morality that comes from the bible has been changing as we develop in our society. We don't burn witches anymore either. We don't stone our children for talking back to us. We don't treat our women as property as the bible tells us to. Our morality is not coming from the bible. The statement was conditional, I don't think you actually follow the bible when it comes to morality.
@AliburX I really hate to harp on this documentation issue. God forbid I should ask you to back up anything you say while you are riffing here. You strike me as the kind of guy who likes to hear himself talk. But I gotta ask what proof do you have that even in the time of the Bible people stoned their children for simply "talking back" as you put it? Just sounds like you don't really understand the culture that produced the bible at all.
@AliburX Where does your morality come from? If it comes from you then it necessarily wouldn't be objective. There must be an objective moral foundation. That is supplied by the Golden Rule, the Bible and by God. Also the law which is based on God. The sun shines on the just and the unjust. God holds us all in existence not just those of us who worship Good. Even if you were an atheist like Jeffrey Dahmer you're still entitled to due process of the law, the presumption of innocence.
@shizzleman8 Morality comes naturally in some form to social creatures. In order to cooperate and work together as a society, we have to have some kind of system that allows that. As humans, we call ours morality. If morality is objective, answer my previous questions. Why are some Christians OK with the death penalty and some aren't? Some are pro-choice and some aren't? Why don't we subjugate women like the bible tells us to anymore? Saying the bible is a source of objective morals is silly.
@AliburX Morals don't come naturally a priori assumptions like atheism do. You get an idea in your head and Mario Andretti can't drive it out. My best advice: Start over.
This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man. < Being true to ourselves and others is a choice we make. The only natural element here is free will choice and that's not natural it's supernatural. Natural selection doesn't make choices for us.
@shizzleman8 Thou hast been enchanted by fairy tales. You can try to rationalize your belief in magic and fairies and unicorns with nonsense statements like "And it must follow, as the night the day". What are you even talking about? Can you answer 1 question? You claim moral objectivity, but can't seem to explain to me why every single Christian I've ever met has had their own moral code. You spout ridiculous nonsense at me like it's meaningful. Grow up.
@AliburX You have a degree in mythology? Your assumptions and non sequitur style of writing are of no concern to me. Your suppositions are no form of evidence and don't qualify as competent, material or relevant argument to anyone other than the uneducated.
If they "Christians" all had their own moral code that wouldn't be objective that would be subjective.
You're not being true to yourself. Your idea of morality is that everyone but you has got it wrong. < hint: That's SUBJECTIVE.
@shizzleman8 No, that's not my idea of morality and I really wish you would stop telling me what I think. You obviously have no idea. Yes, pretty much every human being I've met, including all the Christians seem to have their own moral code, that's true. That does not mean that there isn't some basis, outside of themselves, that help people make at least some moral decisions that could be called objective. Not everything is so black and white, the world is more complex than god did it.
@AliburX The existence of God can be deduced from premises which are absolutely necessary for scientific thought. There is a self-sustaining source for the continued operation of the laws of nature and through the laws of nature and for all material reality. God the one Supreme Being, The Creator and Ruler of the universe.
@shizzleman8 That's a complete fallacy. There are no reasonable premise or logical paths to conclude the existence of god. That's just silly. In order to substantiate the claim that a god exists you would need actual evidence. There is none. There is also ZERO reason to really believe that a god is necessary in ANY way what so ever. Lol.. Love the GOD did it. I'm blaspheming again! Why does god keep blessing the heck out of me with such a great life? Invisible god man is gunna gitcha!
@AliburX Prejudice is the postion that there is no other position. Existence is the path. The opposite of God as the Supreme Creator and Ruler of the universe is accidnental and spontaneous creation and that goes against all science, the laws of nature, natural selection, and the laws of physics i.e. conservation law.
Before you laugh your ass off show me EXACTLY how God didn't do it genius?
Your life is great? How much are you currently being paid for your opinions?
@shizzleman8 LMAO. Haven't we talked about oversimplifying things before? Haven't I also told you to stop saying you know what I think when you obviously don't have a clue? No, there is a position that understands that fantasy is fantasy, and also understands that there are things about the nature of the universe that are unexplained. You're making massive assumptions when you jump to either conclusion. Saying I don't know is true, honest, saying I know my fantasy superman did it is gullible.
@AliburX Saying, "haven't we talked about this before" is not a form of evidence. Being succinct is the law of parsimony something you should study after analyzing the nature of randomness. Randomness is a measure of human ignorance and not an objective property of reality. Saying you don't know is argument by ignorance. "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury my opponent has proved their case beyond a shadow of a doubt that my client is guilty. All I can say is I just don't know."
@shizzleman8 Are you looking for evidence of non-existence? Don't you understand that that's a nonsense question? The person making the claim that something exists is responsible to provide adequate and satisfactory evidence if they don't want other people to tell them they are crazy. Saying I don't know as an answer to a question is TRUE, HONEST. MAKING STORIES UP and presenting them as answers is FANTASY, nothing more. Is that concept not clear to you?
@shizzleman8 It's obvious that you are no scientist. You don't understand skepticism or logic. YOU are the one saying that something is REAL. I.E. YOU are the one making a claim and YOU therefore have the burden of evidence. I am saying that I do not believe your claim because the evidence is both non-existent and the arguments you present have no foundations at all. Instead of bringing forth evidence or explaining where I'm wrong in where I challenged your argument, you run and hide. Typical.
@shizzleman8 Please, saying I don't know is not an argument at all. I'm not establishing a claim that I need to defend when I say that I understand that there are things that are unexplained. There are also things that are explained that I haven't yet learned and that would also fall under I don't know. I'm not offering an alternative to your god fantasy. I can see clearly that you don't really know god exists any more than I do. "God did it" is the ULTIMATE argument from ignorance, idiot.
@AliburX Being argumentative is a form of arguing the same as saying what each of us do and don't know. They're both just really shitty arguments.
Indirect evidence is that which can be deduced. God has been proven billions of times by both direct and indirect evidence. You just think that beliefs because they can't be tested equals there being no God. Beliefs themselves, even incorrect ones, prove God (SuperNature) by falsifying natural selection.
@shizzleman8 No, all I'm doing is trying to understand why ANYONE would hold onto a fantasy belief like yours. I keep hoping someone can explain it, but all they can do is give obtuse rationalizations like "God has been proven billions of times". That's ridiculous. You're making excuses to engage in your fantasy. Natural selection is an entirely different subject completely, disproving evolution, would not prove god either. "Beliefs themselves, prove God" Are you seriously completely nuts?
@shizzleman8 How about we try this. Just answer two questions for me. How do you define your god? Why do you believe in it? If you give me some silly answer like I believe in it because I "feel" god in my heart, I think I'm going to throw up. That's the same reason children believe in imaginary friends. It's ridiculous.
@AliburX God: 1. a. A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions. b. The force, effect, or a manifestation or aspect of this being. Imagination and creativity of children is a bad thing to you why? I just always knew in my brain from age 5 that my parents who "created" me had parents and so on and that there was this one Being who had to have started it all. Try praying.
@shizzleman8 Alright... well.. I already see major flaws in the definition. A definitively perfect being should not be so insecure as to require worship, would not have created evil in the first place, and would not create an imperfect world. A perfect being would be incapable of creating imperfection. First premise, totally impossible, therefore invalid, therefore false.
@AliburX You added the word "require", the definition used the word object as in the object of worship. The argument to evil is opposed by the existence of free will. That's perfect. If you watched a sacrifice being made in a game of chess taken out of context without seeing the checkmate that followed it would seem less than perfect to say the least. We can't always know the end from the beginning. It looks beautiful to me. Did you see the movie Soul Surfer? My biggest fear she BEAT UP!
@shizzleman8 Actually, there is no reason to conclude that "Free will" justifies evil in any way. Is it the free will of the 2 month old child who is starving to death in Somalia, right at this moment, to die because they have no access to food? Or would you consider it the "free will" of the Christian moral majority who would rather go to starbucks then send a donation for food that would feed them for a week? Was it the "free will" of the Japanese to be buried under a Tsunami?
@AliburX It's all those atheist's donations that are keeping all the starving children alive is it?
The small % that are dying who aren't being helped by Christian America is due to malnutrition and preventable disease not for a lack of science. That 13 billion spent in CERN sure would have gone a long way. My friend user dfpolis told me about special relativity breaking down a year ago. How much is a cup of neutrions btw?
@shizzleman8 Well, considering the largest charitable organization on planet earth is run by an atheist, yeah, I bet they save lots of children, and they do it without trying to recruit them into their gang, but that wasn't really the point. The point was that I don't buy "free will" as an excuse for evil. That is another leap of faith. The very foundation you're resting these arguments on is just non-existent, it's all faith. Faith is just an excuse for belief without real reason.
@AliburX I don't have any faith just law. You can't find any evidence for what you don't believe the same way a thief can't find a cop. You start off with a belief that no evidence exists that proves god and ipso facto it's a god damned MIRACLE no evidence exists. There's only eyewitness testimony and expert explanation. Physical evidence comes by way of eyewitness testimony/experience. You believe only naturalists have all the answers and where they don't it's, "the anwer is blowing in"(?)
@shizzleman8 You are completely misunderstanding the difference between holding a belief, and not holding a belief. Not holding a belief is NOT A SEPARATE BELIEF. It is the ABSENCE of the belief. Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable even when you actually have the eye witness. When the eye witness is some anonymous person who could be completely made up in the first place, there is no evidence there at all.
@AliburX If there's no one to report the sound of a tree falling in the forest to you it makes a sound. To me it doesn't matter. Natural science abstracts away subjective knowers and their experiential interactions with objects in nature. I don't hold beliefs and I do know what they are. I used to live by faith until my experience and knowlege of my experience made my beliefs obsolete. Made up people can't testify in court.
@shizzleman8 You do realize that sentences like "I don't hold beliefs and I do know what they are." are jumbled gibberish right? Are you trying to say your beliefs are obsolete because you have actual experience to validate them? I think you're interpreting something in a way that makes you feel good. Can you answer one question? Where do you draw the line between fantasy and reality? How do you tell one from the other?
@AliburX By Law. I draw the line by law. Juris Doctors, 1. My Dad FIFTY YEARS without a loss in court. 2. My sister Mary, 17 years mostly as a maritime attorney working for Alcantura & Frame and 3. My boss Buffy Roney 24 years as JAG without a loss. 12 years as a prosecutor and 12 years as a defense attorney. She ran the whole show for the U.S. Military. She had 37 attorneys working for HER! She also is retired medical malpractice (CA) where she had 9 attorneys working for her in HER FIRM
@AliburX Good work here. You can't explain how fallacious reasoning invalidates a claim, to people who's very identity hinges on accepting fallacy as proof. Once a person makes that leap, the sky is the limit. But when that dude started reciting his law credentials as proof of God, I literaly choked on my fckn coffee. That was hilarious.
@shizzleman8 I think this is really oversimplifying the exploration of morality. I do think that morality can be objective, and the way we arrive at objective morals is the way that we have been, by growing up as a society. As we learn more about what we are doing to each other and the consequences of our actions, we learn how to do better and progress as a society. Our morals evolve and mature with us as we grow. The objective basis being that we should strive to do what is best for all of us
@AliburX Ok so we know now that substantiating what you say is not a big priority for you. You woudl rather just spew unsupported rhetoric. Kinda undermines the pretensions to superior rationality.
@DancinFool3456 You're right, I use logic and reason to substantiate what I say. If you actually read what I've said, use your brain and your heart, you would be able to see the point. I understand that you substitute reason for an old dusty book so I guess it makes sense that "documentation" is more important than reason to you. I don't need documentation to debate the validity of fairy tales, that's just silly.
@AliburX So far all we have seen here is a bunch of assertions without foundation in demonstrable fact.
Substituting your own opinion for evidence won't fly. You must know this, so your refusal to provide even one provable datum can only be explained by an appalling intellectual arrogance or laziness, or both. That is what is truly silly here.
In the former USSR1917-92 the Bible&religion was banned. Within months of the fall of the USSR in 92 the Bible was reintroduced back in Russian schools. A woman Olga Lutsenko was the one behind this&she was an atheist. She now lives in Canada&is a Christian now. Amazing 75 years the Bible was banned now nearly 20 years it is back in Russia&other areas of the former USSR. 75 years of atheism should have destroyed religion in the former USSR but it did not. Check Olga's story on youtube yourself
@RonSafreed Humans have an instinct for god and religion, to help man survive with a privative mind in a complex world, this is why we have different religions all over the world that go back to earliest civilization of man,
"Religion is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it falls in with our instinctual desires."
@arizonaviking If only quotes were a form of evidence. Old information is dangerous here's why: What if the religion of atheism was outlawed and you were going by the old information that you were free to practice it as a religion? Imagine that people who denied the right of other religious people outside of your own religion the right to exist suddenly had the right to deny you this same right. Open season on atheists. You don't have the upto date information, you're being hunted now, see?
@arizonaviking You don't know. If there's ever been even one miracle it falsifies everything you trust is true. Just one person who was struck by lightning and left their body went to heaven and then was later resuscitated at the hospital. Encoch walked with God and was taken, same with Elijah. Jesus didn't die after he was resurrected. You think because you write I'm a nut and you "live" It makes it ture but I have my pilot's licesnse and you've never solo'd an aircraft cause U R a coward.
I don't have a problem with theists or atheists and their interpretations of the natural world...as long as they don't try to FORCE their beliefs on me!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
@Mogley52 You are starting to get it ... You can read the bible and understand it if you don't know god is evil... he is not your god however he is the god of this world... the children were tricked by Lucifer to go to the light (The Mayans were right!) learn the secret teachings of Jesus to the apostil John and it explains a lot also learn gnostism you will find all the answers... hell will be here on earth (not yet) just before the New Jerusalem. The god your religion worships name is Seth
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of the law of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced having survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, then that species is going to survive (be "selected'). That's all that natural selection is! It's a passive process in nature. Read my popular Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS.
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
SCIENCE DOESN'T EXPLAIN AWAY GOD: Natural laws may explain how an airplane or living cell works, but mere undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
I'VE GIVEN WELL OVER A DOZEN LECTURES for scientific creationism before science faculty and students at various secular colleges. At the end, I opened up for comments, questions, rebuttals. Very few of the evolutionist science faculty criticized what I had to say, and, when they did, I successfully refuted them. They knew enough science to realize that what I was saying was true. Read my Internet article in Pravda: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as flawed or useless.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
AMINO ACIDS CAN HAPPEN BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Read my popular Internet articles, "How Forensic Science Refutes Atheism," "Origin of Life Deception by Evolutionists," "Any Life On Mars Came From Earth."
INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE: If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
I LOVE iT =D i SAY the SAME EXACT THiNG TO THE BELiEVERS. THEY ALWAYS SEEM TO THiNK WERE CRAZY FOR BEiNG ATHEiST.... but who gets put in a mental facility when they SEE Things that arent there ... O_o lol
It's not the basis of my belief. It's just a question in response. I'm not going to get into a YouTube debate because that's pathetic. I was just simply putting a thought out there just like everyone else
@pianolanders18 Is that your basis of your belief? " But What if he exists"??? Use your brain. Shun your fear that was instilled into you from your parents and/or whom ever introduced religion to you.
You are an attractive woman. Therefore, you are right. Still, in all seriousness, I share and support your nonbelief. I just happen to not have the balls to go public with it. You have shown that, in fact, you do not need balls to do that.
@TheDustinGreen Because those questions exist, don't leap to irrational for THE QUICK ANSWER. You're better then that!!! Remember your info, " the bible", was written by people who were so primitive in their thinking that they didn't know where the sun went at the end of the day. Yes, being human beings, they did think with the same brain that we use; but they were superstitious and unable to escape it .
@Texmurphy51 How's that different from Christians??? For hundreds of years Christians were not happy unless all were believers. ( missionaries) It is said that 95% of the world population is a believer in God yet I see lots of unhappy, bitter, beat down people EVERY DAY. You saying they're all Atheist? You need to type better; by the way.
@drjackflash How do you know you have true joy? I think there is more beauty and joy in Atheism than theism because you don’t have to follow an ancient set of traditions that have no relevance in modern day society or live up to the expectations of a perfect sky daddy. Joy through Faith is a self-imposed placebo effect of happiness, only after becoming an Atheist did I realize this, and I hope someday you do too. I won’t end with a "god bless you" condescending jab, just a simple: Be Well.
So this poor chick is oblivious to the deception that might be producing a feeling of contentment. This does not mean all is well because many ppl are enjoying themselfes as cancer is eating them from within.
People are born children of satan and have an evil nature. Rebellion to God comes natural. Only those that hate their evil nature and trust God to change them, will go to heaven.
I am sorry but atheism is sad. It is not disrespectful to feel sad for you. Someone cares about you and knows the true joy you are missing. I have friends that have found God and realized they thought they were happy until they knew true joy. It is a "ignorance is bliss" existance. Man, now I really feel sorry for you. God bless you.
@drjackflash What do you mean:"have god"? Everything you claim to have is your own mind. It's imaginary. You have to ADMIT THAT! You don't have a personal relationship with a character in a book. That's crazy! What would you say if a person told you they had a personal relationship with Harry Potter? Crazy; right?
@lynngrube ADMIT THAT?? Why would I admit to something that I don't believe is true. You are comparing the Lord God with Harry Potter?! You are most lost than my comments here can change. Living with your eyes wide shut I see.
atheism is another word for sadness and lonliness.
you are denying the existance of somthing greater than yourself. when your in need, who do you turn to? when you have questions (and i dont belive for 1 second you dont have any) who do you go to for answers? there has to be somthing greater than yourself. im a biology student and everytime i learn somthing new, it never fails to show GODs awe! we still dont know how/ why our bodies do amazing things! look up into space and you'll GODS GREATNES
atheism is another word for sadness and loniyness.
you are denying the existance of somthing greater than yourself. when your in need, who do you turn to? when you have questions (and i dont belive for 1 second you dont have any) who do you go o for answers? there has to be somthing greater than yourself. im a biology student and everytime i learn somthing new, it never fails to show GOD's awe! we still dont know how/ why our bodies do amazing things! look up into space and you'll GODS GREATNES
Actually, this isn't all there is. There's at least Dark Matter and Dark Energy if not other dimensions or even other Universes. Personally, I have lots of "looming questions" like What exactly is the energy of the Higgs Boson. Or does it even exist? Is it possible that variations of configurations of the Top Quark can replace the Higgs Boson? Or in other words, what exactly is the nature of reality?
Look at my Channel to see the real Garden of Eden. I'm the one who found it. It's location is in the Northwest section of Iran, not where everyone else is telling you to look.
The only thing I didn't like about this video was her downing people who are not Atheist. We should all learn to respect each other's opinions. On another note, there is a common belief by Non-Atheists that Atheists are sad because SOME, but not all feel,"If G_d existed my life wouldn't be this way, bad things wouldn't happen, etc."
Jesus did not doubt His faith, He is God and what the Father knows, so does Jesus. If you are referring to the part where Jesus asks God if it be possible that he does not have to go theough the crucifixtion. Jesus was not doubting, he was being anxious for the pain he knew was coming. Atheists are sad people - there lives as all, will be gone in a flash, and eternity will come upon then them in a dreadful way. Atheists are too proud to believe, just in case someone laughs at them. What a shame!
@TheRoss10001 Of course HE didn't doubt. He knew that He had to sacrifice Himself to Himself because He had demanded it of Himself. He prayed to Himself to reassure Himself that He had made the right decision for Himself of Himself. He then told Himself to forgive the people for what they had done to Him, because He didn't want Himself to be too angry at the people who had fulfilled what He had demanded of Himself for Himself. Makes perfect sense.... stupid atheists!!!
“Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth has been made clear from falsehood. Whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allaha has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that never breaks. And Allah hears and knows all things.” (Quran 2:256)
This has been flagged as spam show
(1)
The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning.... And, even since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate a free inquiry? The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded.
drankin2112 2 weeks ago
(2)
But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will soon find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your legs and hands, and fly into your face and eyes.
-- John Adams, letter to John Taylor, 1814
drankin2112 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
drankin2112 2 weeks ago
I would say the sad thing is that she is missing out on the joy of spirital fellowship, joyful songs and also hopes to seek guidance when there is trouble in her life. I would hate to find that there is no God, because then there would be no after life or hope for our future. But the positive things I find about atheist, sometimes I find them to be more like Christians than so called Christains as some of them are corrupted in their true faith.
patsaxon 3 weeks ago
atheism = freedom... that is all
TheSonic1367 3 weeks ago
It's not a world view..just saying
dilt4 2 months ago
@dilt4 Yeah, atheism doesn't imply or mean anything else outside of not believing in a god, while she goes on to describe how it explains things.
LaCerca 1 month ago
It was meant as disrespect.
meridabetty 2 months ago in playlist More videos from mickipedia
A smiling atheist...you just know she's up to something.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
That sweater is epic.
breakingthe4thwall 3 months ago
YOU ARE DAMN RIGHT!!
People believe in god because they dont know answers to certain questions..
Example: 2000 years ago: Thunder is created when Zeus is angry Today : God created us humans (what about evolution you retards?!)
People are gunna be laughing about that 2000 years from now..
sicariusadulescens 3 months ago
Say it louder Micki - You are one of the very few rational ladies in the USA.
707BIGGLES747 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is real and his son Jesus died for you so you could end up in heaven. Jesus is coming back very soon to take back his people to heaven. please repent im begging you. Don't say you havn't been warned if you read :)
craqqer 3 months ago
@craqqer You're wasting your life trying to push this insane nonsense on people. Human cultures around the world are waking up to the obvious fact that religions are BUSINESSES made to CONTROL you and take your resources from you. Please grow out of your fantasies and join the rest of us in the 21st century. The world is going to keep moving forward, with or without you. Please adopt rationality and reason, I'm begging you. Don't say you haven't been warned! :)
AliburX 3 months ago
@shizmaneat "One of the things that is wrong with religion is that it teaches us to be satisfied with answers which are not really answers at all." Richard Dawkins
"I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world." Richard Dawkins
arizonaviking 3 months ago
@arizonaviking Very well said! Exactly what I've been trying to say.
AliburX 3 months ago
@mickipedia God doesn't stop holding us in existence just because we choose to live life without any objective moral foundation. Jeffrey Dahmer was quite happy murdering and turning his victims into sex zombies. Your self worth and value to society isn't measured by your own opinion of your self. There's nothing to doubt anymore. Jesus never doubted God's existence it was whether suffering crucifiction was God's WILL for him that was a temporary concern. Learn how to prove.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
@shizzleman8 If you think the bible is a book that provides an "Objective moral foundation" you are seriously misinformed. There isn't hardly a bible scholar or a denomination of Christianity that agrees with any other about what is and isn't moral. The bible explicitly endorses, slavery, rape, war, incest, and pretty much every other vice you can come up with. If you get your morals from the bible I am deeply concerned that you are working with 11th century barbaric morals.
AliburX 4 months ago
@AliburX Calls for speculation. Why does making a conditional statement about my thinking represent an objectional offense? Because I don't have to tell you what I'm thinking and even if I did tell you how would you know I was right or telling you the truth? You can't know, I could be misinforming you.
Love your neighbor as yourself is the Golden Rule, the sum of all wisdom and a perfect objective moral foundation that anyone who practices it can't fail. The key is objectivity. & Love.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
Comment removed
AliburX 4 months ago
@AliburX That's kind of the only thing I follow from the Bible. Just love people the best you can, there's no law against it. There's a cool video here from one of my favorite teachers/professors Anthony Campolo (tony) Red letter Christians. RonSafreed and his comment about the lady in Russia led me to a page for a broadcasting company in Canada that was featuring it. Tony's written a lot of good books and focuses on being a light to the hurting and poor of the world. Hang in there.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
@AliburX Wow. hardly a bible scholar that agrees with another about what is and is not moral?
Do you have any actual documentation for this or can we just take it for granted you are talking out your ass?
DancinFool3456 4 months ago
@DancinFool3456 Does it matter? Yes, bible scholars agree and disagree on almost every interpretation made by other scholars, individuals, preachers, anyone. They are as inconsistent in the way they think as any two human beings anywhere. The real point is that I've read the bible and it is a flagrantly immoral book. The fact that so many so called believers use it an interpret it to fit their own purposes is just an argument against the idea that there is some kind of objective standard.
AliburX 4 months ago
@AliburX So your answer to my question is "no, I don't have ANY documentation" and "yes, I am talking out my ass" thanks for clearing that up.
DancinFool3456 4 months ago
@DancinFool3456 Perhaps you can explain some things to me then. Why is it that there are some Christians that believe in the death penalty, and some that don't? Why is it there are some Christians that believe in abortion, and some that don't? Why is it that it is now OK for a women to work and be held as an equal to a man, when for thousands of years the Christian morality led people to subjugate women? An objective system would be consistent, there is no consistency here.
AliburX 4 months ago
@AliburX So you don't think that Christians should disagree about anything? Or is it that you misunderstand the whole concept of the objective basis for morality? You see to be confusing specific laws given to the ancient Hebrews with the idea that a belief in God is the basis for an objective morality.
DancinFool3456 4 months ago
@DancinFool3456 No, you are rationalizing away the inconsistencies in your belief system. An objective moral system that was ordained by god, would not change all the time. Yes, I think if you are claiming you have a source for morals that is consistent, understandable, and practically applicable in any way, then everyone who adopts that system would have the same moral code. I've read the bible. It is CLEARLY NOT REAL. Geeze, please grow up.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Riiiight.! As if the differences between particular religions nullified the idea that the existence of God creates an objective morality. Any inconsistency can be explained by the inability or unwillingness of humans to accept aspects of divine morality. The evolution of that morality is a fine tuning of human morality to the divine.
But what hope do we have of coming to an understanding of this when you are unable to accept the existence of history that supports the Bible?
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 Rationalize away the nonsense all you like. I have studied the history that supports the bible and it's nearly non-existent. You have been brainwashed, pure and simple. Your god is a fantasy creation of MEN. I've gone to church, I did the research, there is nothing there. There is as much historical evidence supporting the bible as there is supporting the Illiad. I get that you take it very seriously, but you're really just playing dungeons and dragons... God's gunna gitcha!
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX You can make all the grandiose claims you like, all you are doing is presenting unsupported (and ill informed) opinion. Grow up.
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 LMAO. Love when people use my own insults against me. Too funny. Hey man, you're the one that believes in an invisible, non-substantial, ill-defined, non-existent boogie man in the sky. I was just specifically recommending you consider outgrowing your imaginary friend. The fact that you take offense when people question your imaginary superman, just indicates you don't really buy it any more than I do. Why does god need you to defend anything? Too funny.
AliburX 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AliburX Noting the lack of backing for any of these claims. Still can't come up with anything other than
juvenile ridicule? Very telling.
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 Let's see, what backup do I need to prove a fantasy is a fantasy. Hmm, a complete absence of any empirical, verifiable, objective evidence of actual existence WHATSOEVER. There ya go. Have you ever considered that had you just been born somewhere else, or at some other time, you'd just be believing in the god flavor of the month? Zeus, Allah, Ra, thousands of others... Do you believe in them all? Where is your proof for the non-existence of every god ever conceived of?
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX You have made assertions which pretend to accurately characterize Christianity. I want see some scholarly support for those assertions. So far you have provided nothing more than poorly informed opinions.
You should at least provide some semblance of an argument rather than relying entirely upon rhetorical flourish. Have you ever considered that if you had been born with a brain that you might have figured that out by now?
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 What assertions have I made? I make 1 assertion. I do not think the Christian god is real at all. I make the exact same assertion about Harry Potter, Zeus, Odin... Haven't we been over this? Your god is no more real than any other. It is your job to prove that your superman exists. You're the one telling me to believe in fairy tales and fantasy. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE you numbskull. I told you, I've read the bible, Lee Strobel, Craig, you, NONE of you have ANYTHING AT ALL. LOL
AliburX 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AliburX quoting you "The bible explicitly endorses, slavery, rape, war, incest, and pretty much every other vice you can come up with." I contend that this assertion is baloney. care to back it up?
quoting you again " The real point is that I've read the bible and it is a flagrantly immoral book"
What is the basis for this? By what standard of morality do you make such a comment?
Don't you even read your own comments?
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 If you've read the bible, you know it's there. If you haven't, buy a bible or google all those terms with "bible". If you want to attack me personally over and over without presenting ANYTHING and then attempt to draw me into an argument over the content of your fairy tales, that's not going to happen. How do you tell the difference between fantasy and reality? I think I've been clear on my standards, objective, verifiable, REAL evidence. You have nothing.
AliburX 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 I will allow the truth of the fact that THE BIBLE IS A FLAGRANTLY IMMORAL BOOK FULL OF FAIRY TALES. Stand for itself. I'm not here to prove anything. I'm here to share that I have been actively pursuing knowledge on this subject and some kind of rational reason to believe this nonsense, and I can't find it. Can you provide it? Are you just so offended that I think demons, angels, gods, cloud cities, underground lairs, sounds like dungeons and dragons to me? Why?
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX So you are an ignorant coward with no intellectual integrity whatsoever, Now THAT is a personal attack, however true. What I did previously was to attack your assertions. I has assumed even a brain dead bigot like you can tell the difference, now I know better. You demand one standard for believers in God and another for yourself. You pretend to be superior by demanding I provide "verifiable" proof for the existence of God , yet refuse to provide proof for your claims.Typical
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@AliburX I agree with the golden rule 100%. The morality that comes from the bible has been changing as we develop in our society. We don't burn witches anymore either. We don't stone our children for talking back to us. We don't treat our women as property as the bible tells us to. Our morality is not coming from the bible. The statement was conditional, I don't think you actually follow the bible when it comes to morality.
AliburX 4 months ago
@AliburX I really hate to harp on this documentation issue. God forbid I should ask you to back up anything you say while you are riffing here. You strike me as the kind of guy who likes to hear himself talk. But I gotta ask what proof do you have that even in the time of the Bible people stoned their children for simply "talking back" as you put it? Just sounds like you don't really understand the culture that produced the bible at all.
DancinFool3456 4 months ago
@AliburX Where does your morality come from? If it comes from you then it necessarily wouldn't be objective. There must be an objective moral foundation. That is supplied by the Golden Rule, the Bible and by God. Also the law which is based on God. The sun shines on the just and the unjust. God holds us all in existence not just those of us who worship Good. Even if you were an atheist like Jeffrey Dahmer you're still entitled to due process of the law, the presumption of innocence.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
@shizzleman8 Morality comes naturally in some form to social creatures. In order to cooperate and work together as a society, we have to have some kind of system that allows that. As humans, we call ours morality. If morality is objective, answer my previous questions. Why are some Christians OK with the death penalty and some aren't? Some are pro-choice and some aren't? Why don't we subjugate women like the bible tells us to anymore? Saying the bible is a source of objective morals is silly.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Morals don't come naturally a priori assumptions like atheism do. You get an idea in your head and Mario Andretti can't drive it out. My best advice: Start over.
This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man. < Being true to ourselves and others is a choice we make. The only natural element here is free will choice and that's not natural it's supernatural. Natural selection doesn't make choices for us.
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Thou hast been enchanted by fairy tales. You can try to rationalize your belief in magic and fairies and unicorns with nonsense statements like "And it must follow, as the night the day". What are you even talking about? Can you answer 1 question? You claim moral objectivity, but can't seem to explain to me why every single Christian I've ever met has had their own moral code. You spout ridiculous nonsense at me like it's meaningful. Grow up.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX You have a degree in mythology? Your assumptions and non sequitur style of writing are of no concern to me. Your suppositions are no form of evidence and don't qualify as competent, material or relevant argument to anyone other than the uneducated.
If they "Christians" all had their own moral code that wouldn't be objective that would be subjective.
You're not being true to yourself. Your idea of morality is that everyone but you has got it wrong. < hint: That's SUBJECTIVE.
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 No, that's not my idea of morality and I really wish you would stop telling me what I think. You obviously have no idea. Yes, pretty much every human being I've met, including all the Christians seem to have their own moral code, that's true. That does not mean that there isn't some basis, outside of themselves, that help people make at least some moral decisions that could be called objective. Not everything is so black and white, the world is more complex than god did it.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX The existence of God can be deduced from premises which are absolutely necessary for scientific thought. There is a self-sustaining source for the continued operation of the laws of nature and through the laws of nature and for all material reality. God the one Supreme Being, The Creator and Ruler of the universe.
God did it. ( 8~D)
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 That's a complete fallacy. There are no reasonable premise or logical paths to conclude the existence of god. That's just silly. In order to substantiate the claim that a god exists you would need actual evidence. There is none. There is also ZERO reason to really believe that a god is necessary in ANY way what so ever. Lol.. Love the GOD did it. I'm blaspheming again! Why does god keep blessing the heck out of me with such a great life? Invisible god man is gunna gitcha!
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Prejudice is the postion that there is no other position. Existence is the path. The opposite of God as the Supreme Creator and Ruler of the universe is accidnental and spontaneous creation and that goes against all science, the laws of nature, natural selection, and the laws of physics i.e. conservation law.
Before you laugh your ass off show me EXACTLY how God didn't do it genius?
Your life is great? How much are you currently being paid for your opinions?
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 LMAO. Haven't we talked about oversimplifying things before? Haven't I also told you to stop saying you know what I think when you obviously don't have a clue? No, there is a position that understands that fantasy is fantasy, and also understands that there are things about the nature of the universe that are unexplained. You're making massive assumptions when you jump to either conclusion. Saying I don't know is true, honest, saying I know my fantasy superman did it is gullible.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Saying, "haven't we talked about this before" is not a form of evidence. Being succinct is the law of parsimony something you should study after analyzing the nature of randomness. Randomness is a measure of human ignorance and not an objective property of reality. Saying you don't know is argument by ignorance. "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury my opponent has proved their case beyond a shadow of a doubt that my client is guilty. All I can say is I just don't know."
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Are you looking for evidence of non-existence? Don't you understand that that's a nonsense question? The person making the claim that something exists is responsible to provide adequate and satisfactory evidence if they don't want other people to tell them they are crazy. Saying I don't know as an answer to a question is TRUE, HONEST. MAKING STORIES UP and presenting them as answers is FANTASY, nothing more. Is that concept not clear to you?
AliburX 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 It's obvious that you are no scientist. You don't understand skepticism or logic. YOU are the one saying that something is REAL. I.E. YOU are the one making a claim and YOU therefore have the burden of evidence. I am saying that I do not believe your claim because the evidence is both non-existent and the arguments you present have no foundations at all. Instead of bringing forth evidence or explaining where I'm wrong in where I challenged your argument, you run and hide. Typical.
AliburX 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Please, saying I don't know is not an argument at all. I'm not establishing a claim that I need to defend when I say that I understand that there are things that are unexplained. There are also things that are explained that I haven't yet learned and that would also fall under I don't know. I'm not offering an alternative to your god fantasy. I can see clearly that you don't really know god exists any more than I do. "God did it" is the ULTIMATE argument from ignorance, idiot.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Being argumentative is a form of arguing the same as saying what each of us do and don't know. They're both just really shitty arguments.
Indirect evidence is that which can be deduced. God has been proven billions of times by both direct and indirect evidence. You just think that beliefs because they can't be tested equals there being no God. Beliefs themselves, even incorrect ones, prove God (SuperNature) by falsifying natural selection.
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 No, all I'm doing is trying to understand why ANYONE would hold onto a fantasy belief like yours. I keep hoping someone can explain it, but all they can do is give obtuse rationalizations like "God has been proven billions of times". That's ridiculous. You're making excuses to engage in your fantasy. Natural selection is an entirely different subject completely, disproving evolution, would not prove god either. "Beliefs themselves, prove God" Are you seriously completely nuts?
AliburX 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 How about we try this. Just answer two questions for me. How do you define your god? Why do you believe in it? If you give me some silly answer like I believe in it because I "feel" god in my heart, I think I'm going to throw up. That's the same reason children believe in imaginary friends. It's ridiculous.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX God: 1. a. A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions. b. The force, effect, or a manifestation or aspect of this being. Imagination and creativity of children is a bad thing to you why? I just always knew in my brain from age 5 that my parents who "created" me had parents and so on and that there was this one Being who had to have started it all. Try praying.
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Alright... well.. I already see major flaws in the definition. A definitively perfect being should not be so insecure as to require worship, would not have created evil in the first place, and would not create an imperfect world. A perfect being would be incapable of creating imperfection. First premise, totally impossible, therefore invalid, therefore false.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX You added the word "require", the definition used the word object as in the object of worship. The argument to evil is opposed by the existence of free will. That's perfect. If you watched a sacrifice being made in a game of chess taken out of context without seeing the checkmate that followed it would seem less than perfect to say the least. We can't always know the end from the beginning. It looks beautiful to me. Did you see the movie Soul Surfer? My biggest fear she BEAT UP!
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Actually, there is no reason to conclude that "Free will" justifies evil in any way. Is it the free will of the 2 month old child who is starving to death in Somalia, right at this moment, to die because they have no access to food? Or would you consider it the "free will" of the Christian moral majority who would rather go to starbucks then send a donation for food that would feed them for a week? Was it the "free will" of the Japanese to be buried under a Tsunami?
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX It's all those atheist's donations that are keeping all the starving children alive is it?
The small % that are dying who aren't being helped by Christian America is due to malnutrition and preventable disease not for a lack of science. That 13 billion spent in CERN sure would have gone a long way. My friend user dfpolis told me about special relativity breaking down a year ago. How much is a cup of neutrions btw?
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 Well, considering the largest charitable organization on planet earth is run by an atheist, yeah, I bet they save lots of children, and they do it without trying to recruit them into their gang, but that wasn't really the point. The point was that I don't buy "free will" as an excuse for evil. That is another leap of faith. The very foundation you're resting these arguments on is just non-existent, it's all faith. Faith is just an excuse for belief without real reason.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX I don't have any faith just law. You can't find any evidence for what you don't believe the same way a thief can't find a cop. You start off with a belief that no evidence exists that proves god and ipso facto it's a god damned MIRACLE no evidence exists. There's only eyewitness testimony and expert explanation. Physical evidence comes by way of eyewitness testimony/experience. You believe only naturalists have all the answers and where they don't it's, "the anwer is blowing in"(?)
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 You are completely misunderstanding the difference between holding a belief, and not holding a belief. Not holding a belief is NOT A SEPARATE BELIEF. It is the ABSENCE of the belief. Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable even when you actually have the eye witness. When the eye witness is some anonymous person who could be completely made up in the first place, there is no evidence there at all.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX If there's no one to report the sound of a tree falling in the forest to you it makes a sound. To me it doesn't matter. Natural science abstracts away subjective knowers and their experiential interactions with objects in nature. I don't hold beliefs and I do know what they are. I used to live by faith until my experience and knowlege of my experience made my beliefs obsolete. Made up people can't testify in court.
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 You do realize that sentences like "I don't hold beliefs and I do know what they are." are jumbled gibberish right? Are you trying to say your beliefs are obsolete because you have actual experience to validate them? I think you're interpreting something in a way that makes you feel good. Can you answer one question? Where do you draw the line between fantasy and reality? How do you tell one from the other?
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX By Law. I draw the line by law. Juris Doctors, 1. My Dad FIFTY YEARS without a loss in court. 2. My sister Mary, 17 years mostly as a maritime attorney working for Alcantura & Frame and 3. My boss Buffy Roney 24 years as JAG without a loss. 12 years as a prosecutor and 12 years as a defense attorney. She ran the whole show for the U.S. Military. She had 37 attorneys working for HER! She also is retired medical malpractice (CA) where she had 9 attorneys working for her in HER FIRM
shizzleman8 3 months ago
@AliburX Good work here. You can't explain how fallacious reasoning invalidates a claim, to people who's very identity hinges on accepting fallacy as proof. Once a person makes that leap, the sky is the limit. But when that dude started reciting his law credentials as proof of God, I literaly choked on my fckn coffee. That was hilarious.
drankin2112 2 weeks ago
@AliburX he's quoting from Hamlet you culturally challenged buffoon.
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@shizzleman8 I think this is really oversimplifying the exploration of morality. I do think that morality can be objective, and the way we arrive at objective morals is the way that we have been, by growing up as a society. As we learn more about what we are doing to each other and the consequences of our actions, we learn how to do better and progress as a society. Our morals evolve and mature with us as we grow. The objective basis being that we should strive to do what is best for all of us
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX Ok so we know now that substantiating what you say is not a big priority for you. You woudl rather just spew unsupported rhetoric. Kinda undermines the pretensions to superior rationality.
Good luck with that.
DancinFool3456 4 months ago
@DancinFool3456 You're right, I use logic and reason to substantiate what I say. If you actually read what I've said, use your brain and your heart, you would be able to see the point. I understand that you substitute reason for an old dusty book so I guess it makes sense that "documentation" is more important than reason to you. I don't need documentation to debate the validity of fairy tales, that's just silly.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX So far all we have seen here is a bunch of assertions without foundation in demonstrable fact.
Substituting your own opinion for evidence won't fly. You must know this, so your refusal to provide even one provable datum can only be explained by an appalling intellectual arrogance or laziness, or both. That is what is truly silly here.
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DancinFool3456 I would also like to point out that you seem unable to answer any of my questions.
AliburX 3 months ago
@AliburX I notice that you still haven't stepped up with anything here. Still not willing to present anything other than your own opinions?
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
@DancinFool3456 First things first .
DancinFool3456 3 months ago
In the former USSR1917-92 the Bible&religion was banned. Within months of the fall of the USSR in 92 the Bible was reintroduced back in Russian schools. A woman Olga Lutsenko was the one behind this&she was an atheist. She now lives in Canada&is a Christian now. Amazing 75 years the Bible was banned now nearly 20 years it is back in Russia&other areas of the former USSR. 75 years of atheism should have destroyed religion in the former USSR but it did not. Check Olga's story on youtube yourself
RonSafreed 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RonSafreed And your point was what....?
christallh24 4 months ago
@RonSafreed Humans have an instinct for god and religion, to help man survive with a privative mind in a complex world, this is why we have different religions all over the world that go back to earliest civilization of man,
"Religion is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it falls in with our instinctual desires."
Sigmund Freud
You want to believe in god, It only an instinct!
arizonaviking 4 months ago
@arizonaviking If only quotes were a form of evidence. Old information is dangerous here's why: What if the religion of atheism was outlawed and you were going by the old information that you were free to practice it as a religion? Imagine that people who denied the right of other religious people outside of your own religion the right to exist suddenly had the right to deny you this same right. Open season on atheists. You don't have the upto date information, you're being hunted now, see?
shizzleman8 4 months ago
@shizzleman8 Everyone dies, but not everyone lives, your nothing but a nut case without a life, get medical help.
arizonaviking 4 months ago
@arizonaviking You don't know. If there's ever been even one miracle it falsifies everything you trust is true. Just one person who was struck by lightning and left their body went to heaven and then was later resuscitated at the hospital. Encoch walked with God and was taken, same with Elijah. Jesus didn't die after he was resurrected. You think because you write I'm a nut and you "live" It makes it ture but I have my pilot's licesnse and you've never solo'd an aircraft cause U R a coward.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
@shizzleman8 "Whenever the speech is corrupted so is the mind." Lucius Bierce
arizonaviking 4 months ago
@arizonaviking Quotes that are meant just for you shouldn't be posted with my name at the top.
shizzleman8 4 months ago
Jesus never doubted.....get your facts straight :)
AbigalFerris 4 months ago
@AbigalFerris Actually he did , when he was on the cross. Read that scripture again
KidInsain 4 months ago
Comment removed
AbigalFerris 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbigalFerris "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?
KidInsain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbigalFerris "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?
KidInsain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KidInsain Oh really? Well than show me the exact verse reference that says- Jesus doubted God
AbigalFerris 4 months ago
You're so sweet. :)
paperorpaper 4 months ago
0:53 - 0:58 Jesus never doubted His faith
Redfender13 4 months ago
I recieved the Tao te Ching for Christmas a couple years ago. Might've been 2007 or '08. Funny. I like the book. Makes you think.
BlueMaxx86 4 months ago
I don't have a problem with theists or atheists and their interpretations of the natural world...as long as they don't try to FORCE their beliefs on me!
MishuTaste 4 months ago
True shit!
PoisonBannana 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 You are starting to get it ... You can read the bible and understand it if you don't know god is evil... he is not your god however he is the god of this world... the children were tricked by Lucifer to go to the light (The Mayans were right!) learn the secret teachings of Jesus to the apostil John and it explains a lot also learn gnostism you will find all the answers... hell will be here on earth (not yet) just before the New Jerusalem. The god your religion worships name is Seth
SethJesusSatan 4 months ago
@Mogley52 account for the whole 'wailing and gnashing of teeth' thing then
alexavasquez1992 4 months ago
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 4 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of the law of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced having survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, then that species is going to survive (be "selected'). That's all that natural selection is! It's a passive process in nature. Read my popular Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
SCIENCE DOESN'T EXPLAIN AWAY GOD: Natural laws may explain how an airplane or living cell works, but mere undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
I'VE GIVEN WELL OVER A DOZEN LECTURES for scientific creationism before science faculty and students at various secular colleges. At the end, I opened up for comments, questions, rebuttals. Very few of the evolutionist science faculty criticized what I had to say, and, when they did, I successfully refuted them. They knew enough science to realize that what I was saying was true. Read my Internet article in Pravda: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as flawed or useless.
Mogley52 4 months ago
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN HAPPEN BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Read my popular Internet articles, "How Forensic Science Refutes Atheism," "Origin of Life Deception by Evolutionists," "Any Life On Mars Came From Earth."
Mogley52 4 months ago
INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE: If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 4 months ago
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 4 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I LOVE iT =D i SAY the SAME EXACT THiNG TO THE BELiEVERS. THEY ALWAYS SEEM TO THiNK WERE CRAZY FOR BEiNG ATHEiST.... but who gets put in a mental facility when they SEE Things that arent there ... O_o lol
TyeDye07 5 months ago in playlist There is no God
Comment removed
TyeDye07 5 months ago in playlist There is no God
It's not the basis of my belief. It's just a question in response. I'm not going to get into a YouTube debate because that's pathetic. I was just simply putting a thought out there just like everyone else
pianolanders18 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You will be judged whether you believe it or not. See "God's Prison" to find out how you will fare.
Electfilmproductions 5 months ago
But...WHAT IF...there really IS a God?
pianolanders18 5 months ago
@pianolanders18 Is that your basis of your belief? " But What if he exists"??? Use your brain. Shun your fear that was instilled into you from your parents and/or whom ever introduced religion to you.
lynngrube 5 months ago
I think I love you!
CARPSPUDPICKER 5 months ago in playlist There is no God
@CARPSPUDPICKER Yeah but she really needs to re-think her outfit.
lynngrube 5 months ago
You are an attractive woman. Therefore, you are right. Still, in all seriousness, I share and support your nonbelief. I just happen to not have the balls to go public with it. You have shown that, in fact, you do not need balls to do that.
OnlyBrainLeft 5 months ago
if there is no god how are we living? How are we breathing? Who gives us air? A:GOD Stupidity=athiest
TheDustinGreen 5 months ago
@TheDustinGreen ...oh wow
cazz3000 5 months ago
@TheDustinGreen Because those questions exist, don't leap to irrational for THE QUICK ANSWER. You're better then that!!! Remember your info, " the bible", was written by people who were so primitive in their thinking that they didn't know where the sun went at the end of the day. Yes, being human beings, they did think with the same brain that we use; but they were superstitious and unable to escape it .
lynngrube 5 months ago
sexy
ccraigd89 5 months ago in playlist There is no God
You are not said but there are a lot of angry miserable Atheists posting videos on Youtube.
Watch a few & you will see some of the most bitter people I have ever seen.
I am an Agnostic & happen in my beliefs & ideas.
I think the difference is that some Atheists feel that all other people must believe as they do. Thats what makes them bitter.
Texmurphy51 5 months ago
@Texmurphy51 How's that different from Christians??? For hundreds of years Christians were not happy unless all were believers. ( missionaries) It is said that 95% of the world population is a believer in God yet I see lots of unhappy, bitter, beat down people EVERY DAY. You saying they're all Atheist? You need to type better; by the way.
lynngrube 5 months ago
@lynngrube "Christians were not happy unless all were believers"
Ever meet a missionary? They are Crazy Happy. They try to convert people for their own good,(in their mind).
They feel Sorry for them, not unhappy.
I say by %tage Atheists are more unhappen than Theists in general.
There are unhappy people in the world but mostly they are the ones in counries at war or Gov supression.
Dont you think a kid is more happen when he Believes in the magic of Santa before finding out he does not exist?
Texmurphy51 5 months ago
sucks to have no life doesnt it my bitter atheist friend?
Szekler11 5 months ago in playlist There is no God
@Szekler11 Your watching her video; dude. Who has no life??? She sound well adjusted and well educated too me.
lynngrube 5 months ago
"There's no reason to look outside of this life for importance, or value, or meaning".
Well said!
hearts0ngs 5 months ago
@drjackflash How do you know you have true joy? I think there is more beauty and joy in Atheism than theism because you don’t have to follow an ancient set of traditions that have no relevance in modern day society or live up to the expectations of a perfect sky daddy. Joy through Faith is a self-imposed placebo effect of happiness, only after becoming an Atheist did I realize this, and I hope someday you do too. I won’t end with a "god bless you" condescending jab, just a simple: Be Well.
Aeriths 5 months ago
Props to you, and you know, at the end of the day, all we can do is the best we can.
Aeriths 5 months ago
the reason why im not going ta say anything because your very sexy looking
TheThelighting 5 months ago
All we can tell you is to try to understand faith, and ask God to show Himself to you. take it or leave it.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely Rev 21:6
circasurvive777 5 months ago
So this poor chick is oblivious to the deception that might be producing a feeling of contentment. This does not mean all is well because many ppl are enjoying themselfes as cancer is eating them from within.
j919or 5 months ago
People are born children of satan and have an evil nature. Rebellion to God comes natural. Only those that hate their evil nature and trust God to change them, will go to heaven.
j919or 5 months ago
Drifting downstream towards a waterfall is easier than swimming upstream to escape it.
j919or 5 months ago
YES TELL TELLEM WOMAN IM WITH YOU
MrGoth777 5 months ago
I am sorry but atheism is sad. It is not disrespectful to feel sad for you. Someone cares about you and knows the true joy you are missing. I have friends that have found God and realized they thought they were happy until they knew true joy. It is a "ignorance is bliss" existance. Man, now I really feel sorry for you. God bless you.
drjackflash 5 months ago
@drjackflash what joy is there in suppression
drood78 5 months ago
@drood78 Suppression or acceptance?
drjackflash 5 months ago
@drjackflash Suppression my wife found this out
since she moved in with me she had a real life without fear for having fun or a own mind
drood78 5 months ago
@drood78 I have fun all the time. You can have God and fun you know. I hope she was not embroiled in some pseudo-christian group.
drjackflash 5 months ago
@drjackflash im sorry i didn't want to make it personal and attack you personal
yes the group she attended was kinda if you don't believe you die and go to hell and they told this in a threathening way
i know i can't blame everyone that believes for that
again my apologies
drood78 5 months ago
@drjackflash What do you mean:"have god"? Everything you claim to have is your own mind. It's imaginary. You have to ADMIT THAT! You don't have a personal relationship with a character in a book. That's crazy! What would you say if a person told you they had a personal relationship with Harry Potter? Crazy; right?
lynngrube 5 months ago
@lynngrube ADMIT THAT?? Why would I admit to something that I don't believe is true. You are comparing the Lord God with Harry Potter?! You are most lost than my comments here can change. Living with your eyes wide shut I see.
drjackflash 4 months ago
atheism is another word for sadness and lonliness.
you are denying the existance of somthing greater than yourself. when your in need, who do you turn to? when you have questions (and i dont belive for 1 second you dont have any) who do you go to for answers? there has to be somthing greater than yourself. im a biology student and everytime i learn somthing new, it never fails to show GODs awe! we still dont know how/ why our bodies do amazing things! look up into space and you'll GODS GREATNES
Theelmawad 6 months ago
atheism is another word for sadness and loniyness.
you are denying the existance of somthing greater than yourself. when your in need, who do you turn to? when you have questions (and i dont belive for 1 second you dont have any) who do you go o for answers? there has to be somthing greater than yourself. im a biology student and everytime i learn somthing new, it never fails to show GOD's awe! we still dont know how/ why our bodies do amazing things! look up into space and you'll GODS GREATNES
Theelmawad 6 months ago
Skydancer365 yeah i belive they should just let their kids make there own choice
somerandom280 6 months ago
Actually, this isn't all there is. There's at least Dark Matter and Dark Energy if not other dimensions or even other Universes. Personally, I have lots of "looming questions" like What exactly is the energy of the Higgs Boson. Or does it even exist? Is it possible that variations of configurations of the Top Quark can replace the Higgs Boson? Or in other words, what exactly is the nature of reality?
Skydancer365 6 months ago
darthelghastN7 well im ok with it but wen they go door knocking and try to stupify other people i get angry
somerandom280 6 months ago
@somerandom280
What really upsets me is when I see them brainwashing their children with hateful beliefs.
Skydancer365 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at my Channel to see the real Garden of Eden. I'm the one who found it. It's location is in the Northwest section of Iran, not where everyone else is telling you to look.
downyourtube 6 months ago
The only thing I didn't like about this video was her downing people who are not Atheist. We should all learn to respect each other's opinions. On another note, there is a common belief by Non-Atheists that Atheists are sad because SOME, but not all feel,"If G_d existed my life wouldn't be this way, bad things wouldn't happen, etc."
fromblammo 6 months ago
Jesus did not doubt His faith, He is God and what the Father knows, so does Jesus. If you are referring to the part where Jesus asks God if it be possible that he does not have to go theough the crucifixtion. Jesus was not doubting, he was being anxious for the pain he knew was coming. Atheists are sad people - there lives as all, will be gone in a flash, and eternity will come upon then them in a dreadful way. Atheists are too proud to believe, just in case someone laughs at them. What a shame!
TheRoss10001 6 months ago
@TheRoss10001 Of course HE didn't doubt. He knew that He had to sacrifice Himself to Himself because He had demanded it of Himself. He prayed to Himself to reassure Himself that He had made the right decision for Himself of Himself. He then told Himself to forgive the people for what they had done to Him, because He didn't want Himself to be too angry at the people who had fulfilled what He had demanded of Himself for Himself. Makes perfect sense.... stupid atheists!!!
76spinoza 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth has been made clear from falsehood. Whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allaha has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that never breaks. And Allah hears and knows all things.” (Quran 2:256)
Peace :)
qut1111 6 months ago