It's not up to science to determine whether the supernatural exists or not. Science only concerns itself in natural phenomena. Supernatural by definition is beyond the natural. Science cannot affirm or deny its existence. The reason ID was destroyed was because it tried to posit itself as a valid science and encroach upon actual science while invoking the supernatural to explain its "theory". The supernatural should have no place in science.
to the guy with the supernatural question, there is no evidence of the supernatural either. so why make something up. science doesnt make anything up. creationism/ID does. To quote George Carlin "it's all just something (religion) somebody made up."
It's not up to science to determine whether the supernatural exists or not. Science only concerns itself in natural phenomena. Supernatural by definition is beyond the natural. Science cannot affirm or deny its existence. The reason ID was destroyed was because it tried to posit itself as a valid science and encroach upon actual science while invoking the supernatural to explain its "theory". The supernatural should have no place in science.
VoidedMirror 7 months ago
to the guy with the supernatural question, there is no evidence of the supernatural either. so why make something up. science doesnt make anything up. creationism/ID does. To quote George Carlin "it's all just something (religion) somebody made up."
lhurien 11 months ago
I'm sorry I missed it. At least it's posted so I can soak it in.
lhurien 11 months ago