this guy was very exciting to watch:) bad that he doesn`t win a ring here you see all hate lebron because he hasn`t won a ring but sir charles hasn`t won a ring too:) charles barkley is cool:) lebron too:)
Looking at these old videos you can`t help yourself but feel nostalgic.NBA used to be so fun. It had guys like Barkley, Kemp, Jordan, Magic, Drexler, Rodman, Miller, Ewing, Peyton, Mutombo, Malone, Olajuwon.... Look at what the league has come to now Bosh, James, Parker, Gasol, Howard, Garnett, Billups, Ginobili,Duncan, Anthony...Who the fuck in his right mind would pay to see them?Only true superstars today are Kobe and D-Wade and even them have the charisma of raw potato.
Most everyone misses this, I'm not sure how many that commented here have watched him live either in person or TV but the most important asset he had despite his god gifted athleticism and despite his heighth was his fierce competitiveness which was 2nd only to Jordan in his era, I ve seen him single handedly take the life out of entire teams! Thats what seperates him from the others...I read someone saying Andre Iguadola and Jason Maxiell are you kidding me?!?
Most everyone misses this, I'm not sure how many that commented here have watched him live either in person or TV but the most important asset he had despite his god gifted athleticism and despite his heighth was his fierce competitiveness which was 2nd only to Jordan in his era, I ve seen him single handedly take the lift out of entire teams! Thats what seperates him from the others...I read someone saying Andre Iguadola and Jason Maxiell are you kidding me?!?
nba today is ridiculous, kobe bryant dwyane wade, lebron james, dwight howard, lamar odom, none of them can be considered a new jordan, magic johnson, larry bird, shaquille o'neal and charles barkley.
people are amazed with this kinds of players cuz they never watched a mj's, magics' barkley's, bird's game
Chuck Wade was a bad motherfucker. People forget that Chuck was 6'4" 6'5" on a good day and the nigga averaged double digit rebounds EVERY year of his career except his rookie year (8.6). Lets see the pussies in the league do that nowadays.
Ahhh..my fav player...sir charles even defied dr. j when he came to philly...it was a new day when he came to the sixers....he brought so much energy and vitalitiy to a city that was falling asleep after winning a title....he was controversial, abusive towards teammates and reporters, but we loved him. he was us. philly. loud, aggressive, but productive....25 and 12....at 6'4 1/2....he was a beast.
OMG, do you see those elbows, knees, and body contact? Thats how basketball use to be played. If Lebron played back then, he wouldn't stand a chance. He would come out with a gash and blood all over him.
you don't need to put down a person or entire generation to compliment another. I'm pretty sure a full grown 6'8" 260lbs man could hold his own regardless of the era. Chill out son.
yeah except ron ron never averaged 25 and 12, whereas chuck did that several times. he was about 3x the player artest is and that's taking nothing from ron ron. barkley is an all-time great though
uh, only if you know nothing about who the fuck barkley was in the NBA. We're talking 25 and 12 for ten + years at 6'4". Barkley dunked on everybody. One of the 10 best athletes ever to play the game.
For me? til now their still no player that can be compared with Sir Charles. If MJ = Kobe/Wade Magic = LBJ, Shaq = Dwight etc. But for charles??? no one. That's my honorarium to Sir Charles. No player can compare to him for now. why?..
a 6'5-6'6 "Power Forward"
can run the break and even can handle the ball.
Can't be called a "round mound of rebound" for a undersize 4.
@skipper00718 blake griffin is a bigger version of sir charles handles the ball can run the break and shoot mid range brings fun and excitement to game and pree good defence
No it wasnt, cause with size i meant height not mass, thats also the reason why i wrote that.... i somebody had unbelivable strenght, cleverness or bodyathletism, he can compete with taller guys especially in the nba, look at kevin love, hes also not the tallest, but he has the best round IQ in the league.....
No it wasnt, cause with size i meant height not mass, thats also the reason why i wrote that.... if somebody has unbelivable strenght, cleverness or bodyathletism, he can compete with taller guys especially in the nba, look at kevin love, hes also not the tallest, but he has the best round IQ in the league.....
@skipper00718 i grew up watching barkley i think the main reason he cant be duplicated is because you may never see a 6'5 power forward ever again...i dont think barkley himself could have played the 4 in todays nba guys are just way to big and to athletic..i think a huge part of the reason charles was able to do what he did even back in the 90's was because the refs knew how to swallow the dam whistle and let guys play (physical) jordan,magic and barkley where always my fav players
@skipper00718 I think Blake could be the new breed of Charles... plays with the same... violence in his game. Just pure beasting his was to the rim. Charles was my favorite player growing up.
@skipper00718 shaq equal dwight hell no and magic equal lebron fuck nah man, but aint really no body you can compare chuck to or any of these dudes you tryin to compare especially shaq to dwight THE most DOMINANT not the best but most dominant PLAYER ever to dwight, dwight got hops and thats it, which is what allows him to be a good defender, but shaq was feared cause he would try to murder you if you ran up on him in the paint thinkin shit was sweet
@butterybeefslinguh Fuck that THE MOST DOMINANT PLAYER shit. He is dominant today because the competition is complete shit. If Howard played Shaq in his prime he would be a stain on the floor. Not to mention guys like Ewing, Kemp, Mutombo, Olajuwon, Rodman. He would have firm 2 rebounds average against them. Most dominant my ass.
pushing the admiral, throwing the ball at shaq's head... and then finally takes it out on the mascot! sir charles, still the man. i'm gonna dig up my vhs...
Hakeem was deadly, and maybe the best 5 on defense ever. He was also a great rebounder, when he needed to be. I don't think Hakeen was so good on offense as many people think. He wasn't a great finisher. He needed to have plays set up for him & had a mediocre jump shot. Robinson, Shaq & Wilt all had better offensive games. I don't want to take away from Hakeen's talents--I think he was the best defensive player ever. On offense, he's merely brilliant.
@sinjinthule wtf?? you don't know about the dream shake? fade away jumpers from the baseline? drop steps? spin moves? hakeem schooled shaq(though a young shaq but still close its peak) in 1995 finals, hakeem schooled robinson in 1995 western conference finals, and schooled ewing in the 1994 finals!
My Starting five....Magic,Jordan,bird,barkley,duncan. I know duncan is a so called pf, but ill use him as a center. I would really think about Steve Nash running this team instead of magic, only because i dont need a scorer as a point guard. No body runs the floor better than magic or nash, had to go with magic...5 championships to none.
As far as Duncan's position goes, I'm inclined to agree. I know he's almost always listed as a 4 but he really plays more like a 5, especially on defense.
@sleepezfactory magic,jordan,james,barkley, olajuwon.. i think this would be the most versatile team. all can play multiple positions! and this is really a fast team!
the small forward should be ethier david robsoion julius irving or possibly shawn kemp...you could even have mj or scottie pippin and if you have mj at the 3 then have ethier clyde drexler or larry bird at the 2
and at center you should never put mutumbo unless you want your center fouled out in two mins...put the admiral or Ewing cause they were both monsters
chris anderson? LMao!! With all the other options. Fuck it that starting 5 may not make playoffs with all 5 having selfish egos. U must be sarcastic with this 1 boy!!
I'd rank Garnett #2. I love Duncan's game but seriously, the dude's a center. Howard is really more a 4 then a 5, whatever they try to call him. He should be in the debate. Malone, honestly, gained more from Stockton then the other way around. No disrespect. Karl Malone would have been an all-star anywhere but without Stockton he wouldn't have been all-world.
Barkle was alone from 1986 to 1992 and had Good but not Great Teams like Duncan the rest of his career. After 1995 he could hardly play do to back injuries (same ones that Bird had in 1988-89 season) and knee problems. A Prime Barkley was something Else. a Top 5-10 Player Impact Wise. Reality Wise!
the same could be applied to Garnett i suppose. he only had 1 really good team in minny and they were the number 1 seed that year.. its not really a diss on duncan because i have him ranked 5th ALL-TIME lol
FG% and Field Goal Attempts Per Game are As Important or Even MORE than PPG.Barkley from the PF Positon is the Most Efficient FOCAL Scorer Ever. McHale second.
Barkley did not have Stockton nor a Pick & Roll System To Live Off neither did he have the Greatest Passing Forward = Bird, Tiny Archibald, nor DJ, prime Ainge, Walton (one of the Best C Passers Ever) or Maxwell YET HE SHOT: 58.13% (21.6 PPG) Season and Play-Offs: 55.13% (22.5 PPG) 2-Point FG! that is Shaq-like INSIDE! Shaq-like!
You are right, FG% is more important than PPG because it means that if you took as many shots as a leading scorer, you would have more points, etc.
However, I never argued for McHale, or even for PPG. I always stayed true to my argument that Karl Maline had better career total numbers, man. That's all im sayin
FG% and Field Goal Attempts Per Game are As Important or Even MORE than PPG.Barkley is from the PF Positon is the Most Efficient FOCAL Scorer Ever.McHale second.
Barkley did not have Stockton nor a Pick&Roll System Fast Paced to Live Off neither did he have the Greatest Passing Forward = Bird, Tiny Archibald, nor DJ, prime Ainge, Walton (one of the Best C Passers Ever) or Maxwell YET HE SHOT58.13% (21.6 PPG) Season and Play-Offs: 55.13% (22.5 PPG) 2-Point FG! that is Shaq-like INSIDE!
Wrong! Barkley averaged more Rebounds per Game, more Assist Per Game, more Steals Per Game, more Blocks Per Game, was a way more Efficient Scorer FG% per lesser FGAs taken Per Game, As a Focal Scorer only Second in All-Time List 2-Point FG% in the Season to Shaq! (58% season and 55% play-offs, Malone 52% season and a pathetic 46% play-offs), Higher EFF, Higher PER in their primes and before CHucks injuries 1985-1995 Barkley WAY BETTER THAN MALONE. Anyone who lived to see it knows this. Bye!
Listen man I accept all your arguments because they are all correct and accurate. But mine are too. I respect your opinion and the way you put it forward, and I respect that you think Charles was the greatest. I just wish he would have played longer, or won some rings so as to let there be no doubt who's the greatest PF of all time. There's no doubt there's ever been anyone like him and that's what makes him so special and that's why he is my 2nd favorite player of all time.
My son asked me who is da best PF ever He said Mark Jackson (dick rider) said Tim Duncan was I had to think way back then I said Tim Duncan has the rings and rightly so he played wit good teams and has a good coach,but son da best PF I ever seen (considering he was only according to his first coach Billy Cunningham 6'5 wit sneakers) is Charles Barkley dis guy was a freak of nature strong bold talented a strait up b-ball player.If he woulda been 6'8 WHEW! I agree wit AceroySangre C.B is the best!
Its callled humbleness. Now you name me the so many skills is Duncan better than Barley other than Shot Blocking and Interior Defense? Scoring and Desgning his Shot? FG%? Dribbling? Driving? 1 on 1 Spin Moves? Far Range Shooting? 3-Point Shooting? FT Shooting? Rebounding? Creating and Assisting? Clutch Scoring? Floor Defense? Steals? Athletic abilities? Speed, Power, Strength, Leap? IndimidatioN? All These No!
Aceroy: I love Charles Barkley, he is who I wanna be like, he plays the way I wanna play, but when considering what the PF position is supposed to be and career accomplishments, I still think it's Tim Duncan or Karl Malone. Tim has better fundamentals of basketball, has more rings, more MVPs, and was defenitely the leader of all the Spurs team. Tim Duncan wasn't always as slow as he is now. He had great speed and quickness and strength and post moves. He's more of what a PF is.
Karl Malone better than Barkley at what FT shooting? Ha! Thats about it.
Barkley is 1 onf only 2 Players to be in the Top 10 EFF and PER Player of All TIme in both the Play-Offs and he didn`t need no Duncan, Stockton, Pippen, McHale-Parish-Maxweel-DJ, Jabbar-Worthy-McADoo-Wilks or a Full Squad like the Pistons or Blazers to make it to the finals against all odds! A Prime 1985 to 1995 before his back and knee injuries Barkey was way better than Malone and Duncan by Miles!
Malone is 2nd all time in scoring. That defenitrly shows his greatness, and has more rebouds than Barkley. Like I said. Talent wise Barkley was probably better than Duncan and Malone, but Malone and Duncan have done more in their careers or have better numbers than Barkley.
¿Better Numbers? He averaged 11.7 RPG for the Season & 12. 9 RPG in the Play-Offs clearly a better rebounder than Malone. A Way superior Passer and Game Creator than Malone. Assiter aswell. Superior Scorer and More Efficient FG% than Malone. Barkley`s 2-Point FG% only comparable to Shaq and Gilmore for the Season (21.6 PPG on 58.13% and 22.5 PPG on 55.13% in the Play-Offs while Malone`s is 51.9% & 46% Pathetic in the Play-Offs). Barkley is 1 of only 2 Players in The All-Time Top 10 EFF/PER (MJ)
these are averages. Malone had more total points and rebounds than Barkley and longevity is another measure of greatness. Barkley is my 2nd favorite player of all time (MJ) but stats and accomplishments don't lie. If Barkley wouldn't of had his injuries and played longer, or if he had won a ring or two then there would be no questioning who is better, but he didn't. Duncan was able to lead his team to 4 rings and Malone dominated for 15+ years. You're right though Barkley had more overall skills
Longevity is a measure of only that, Longevitiy. It does not measure Skill, Impact or Level of Game. He was better he has a Higher PER and EFF than Malone (between 1985 and 1995 even more evident) and not to mention he did not have the Greatest Pure Point Guard Passing To Him in a System Designed for him to Score. Barkley had to Score on his own, design his shot and shoot way higher FG% and was the 1st Player to get the MVP other any other player not named Bird-Magic-MJ
Longevity is also a measure of greatness, especially when you continue to play great throughout you longevity. You're right, the offense did run through Malone and Stockton defenitely helped, but it doesn't take from Malone. You can't deny what Malone did and what Duncan is doing, defenitely give them argument for best PF of all time. Malone also got an MVP with Jordan in the league, and Duncan has more MVPs than both of them.
I'm sorry but can you please explain PER and EFF to me?
Longevity is a measure of no injuries and taking care of his body it has nothing to do with BEING MORE SKILLED, HAVING MORE IMPACT OR BEING A BETTER PLAYER . Imagine we both play and you are better than me between ages 22 and 32 but you suffer injuries and from that point i show as better as you, does that mean i was better than you? (even myself would know you are better than me) Nope it just means you where more fit and less injury prone thats it: PER and EFF impact of player per minute per -
Okay but think about this: Don't you think tht with a body like his 6"4" 270 lbs would take a toll on his knees. Sure he was unstoppable because of how big and fast he was, but it would eventually catch up to him. Longevirty is one thing, but to continue to be among the league best like Malone did for 15+ years shows greatness. It would be different if he continued to play but not with the same numbers, but he maintained his stats throughout his career.
Anyone who saw Barkley play between ages 22 to about 32 (total prime) knows that Barkley was better. Anyone!. Barkley was a Better player in pretty much every aspect but FT shooting, Barkley could take games over, had 40-20 games in the play-offs while Malone was dependant on a system. Malone could not do shit on his own without Stockton and the Sloan System and he shot pathetic in the play-offs (Clutch Time!). I applaude Malone for his longevity but player he aint Charles. Period!
I never said longevity shows better skills, but think about this: If you showcase your skills once, everyone knows you have them, but you haven't proven that you are great, or that your career is great. Barkley had more overall skills than both Duncan and Malone, but how many players had more skills than someone like Bird, but aren't recognized as greater? Skills doesn't equal greatness. It's a combination of awards, accomplishments, rings, career totals, milestones, and also skills.
Player Efficiency and EFF show the Real Level of the Player not Popularity Contests, MVPs or Shooting 25 FGA PG while not even making the 50% mark.
Barkley is found in the Top 10 EFF Players and PER Per Minute of Efficiency for Play-Offs and Season: that is where Wilt, Russel, Big O, Bird, Baylor, Magic, Jordan, Shaq and very few others are found.
A 1985 to 1995 Barkley > Malone by Miles
Ths is not a race of age but of who was better and Barkley was better. End
As a career and stats he is right there around Duncan/Malone probably better. In terms of longevity ofcourse he aint Malone etc but if you talk about a Prime vs Prime. Barkley owns! In the Play-Offs Barkley really could take games over on his own something Duncan and Malone couldn`t. They where more consistant, more disciplined off court and took care of their bodies etc but they could not reach the level of a Prime Barkley. Barkley is scecond in 40 Pts-20 Rbd games to Wilt in the Play-Offs
As career stats Malone is better, and in career Duncan is better because f his MVPs and 4 rings and finals MVPs. As far as prime vs prime Barkley was better and has more skills overall. But when you say who is the best of all time, everything goes into it, not just prime vs prime or skills. it has to do with skills, prime, but also, longevity, accomplishments, etc. you know?
Career Yes, Stats No. Career ofcourse Barkley was the most hated player in his time, coaches, refs, commisoners etc all hated Barkley etc even the 1990 MVP was stolen by Magic and his nice smile because Barkley deserved it and kept being underrated.Championships just say you had the better team. Just like George Best played in Whales and did not go to the World Cup doesnt mean he was the Best European Player in the 60s by Miles. Barkleys Stats, EFF and PER clearly show that he was the Best`.
Malone has better stats than Barkley man. Not averages, totals. More rebounds and points, the two most important stats for a PF. And Duncan has had a better career than both Malone and Barkley. 4 rings 2 MVPs, 3 finals MVPs
Wrong! Barkley averaged more Rebounds per Game, more Assist Per Game, more Steals Per Game, more Blocks Per Game, was a way more Efficient Scorer FG% per lesser FGAs taken Per Game, As a Focal Scorer only Second in 2-Point FG% in the Season (58% season and 55% play-offs, Malone 52% season and 46% play-offs), Highre EFF, Higher PER in their primes and before CHucks injuries 1985-1995 Barkley WAY BETTER THAN MALONE. Anyone who lived to see it knows this. Bye!
Best forwards- Barkley and Karl malone
steve47mopar 2 weeks ago
this guy was very exciting to watch:) bad that he doesn`t win a ring here you see all hate lebron because he hasn`t won a ring but sir charles hasn`t won a ring too:) charles barkley is cool:) lebron too:)
jbljbljbl1995 2 months ago
If you played against Charles
You better hope you've got a 20 point lead cause in those last three minutes, charles becomes a freak and will eat up your lead!
theoriginalTeej 3 months ago
i love this
misterinside 4 months ago
What's the name of this song?
4045404540454045 4 months ago
Charles hates rap. So do I.
maniac1075 4 months ago
Looking at these old videos you can`t help yourself but feel nostalgic.NBA used to be so fun. It had guys like Barkley, Kemp, Jordan, Magic, Drexler, Rodman, Miller, Ewing, Peyton, Mutombo, Malone, Olajuwon.... Look at what the league has come to now Bosh, James, Parker, Gasol, Howard, Garnett, Billups, Ginobili,Duncan, Anthony...Who the fuck in his right mind would pay to see them?Only true superstars today are Kobe and D-Wade and even them have the charisma of raw potato.
petar1shuwack 5 months ago
@VeoShock what is the name of the song??
SLee48001 5 months ago
wow, Sir Charles is my favorite player of all time,awesome!! too bad he neve won one :( Nice video Clips..
lulu97764 5 months ago
song?:)
mmatheuss15 6 months ago
The best !!! Player !!!
74snatch 6 months ago
-- Great player, horrible music... =/
cantecleer 7 months ago
and to think i used to like rap music...
badabumbadabing1 8 months ago
My rebound! 1:09
jandroaaaplus 8 months ago
Most everyone misses this, I'm not sure how many that commented here have watched him live either in person or TV but the most important asset he had despite his god gifted athleticism and despite his heighth was his fierce competitiveness which was 2nd only to Jordan in his era, I ve seen him single handedly take the life out of entire teams! Thats what seperates him from the others...I read someone saying Andre Iguadola and Jason Maxiell are you kidding me?!?
migelini1 8 months ago
Most everyone misses this, I'm not sure how many that commented here have watched him live either in person or TV but the most important asset he had despite his god gifted athleticism and despite his heighth was his fierce competitiveness which was 2nd only to Jordan in his era, I ve seen him single handedly take the lift out of entire teams! Thats what seperates him from the others...I read someone saying Andre Iguadola and Jason Maxiell are you kidding me?!?
migelini1 8 months ago
This dude brought funny into the game..I love this guy!!!
145bobby 9 months ago
damn! He got balls to fight shaq
145bobby 10 months ago
Chuck is cool player I guess, but I'm glad he can't brag about winning a title. If he did, he would be an even WORSE jack-off....;P
Maestro13193 10 months ago
WTF @ 4:58 him humping Isiah Thomas, then slapping his butt??!! That was some gay ass shit, come Chuck!!!
VoiceOfReezun 10 months ago
If Lebron played the 4 he'd be a comparable player, but Lebron probably can't guard the 4 like Barkley he was a monster
kilkee15 11 months ago 2
i hate that shitty music
Edgeraze 11 months ago
blake griffin will soon
8GRUM8 1 year ago
hes in my fav five
mikallink 1 year ago
Starting at 0:42 was Barkley's last NBA basket.
AlamoSoldier 1 year ago
minute 45 seconds best suns play ever....
matty1081 1 year ago
The most akward hof player ever
BJ0296 1 year ago
nba today is ridiculous, kobe bryant dwyane wade, lebron james, dwight howard, lamar odom, none of them can be considered a new jordan, magic johnson, larry bird, shaquille o'neal and charles barkley.
people are amazed with this kinds of players cuz they never watched a mj's, magics' barkley's, bird's game
nba today is ridiculous
MTHvideos 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=ZKk2gswoodw Charles Barkley Requiem for a dream
CroBullsFan1 1 year ago
back then barkley could take over a game.now i like his taco bell commericals.
mow1717 1 year ago
sweet video, i liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeee it
ghonasis 1 year ago
is the best player I saw, barkley was like the rolling stones, michael jordan was like the beatles
pardovandai 1 year ago 2
Haha, u said lebron James heck nah, Jordan at sf and Kobe at ag
TheSportsAnylist2010 1 year ago
Chuck Wade was a bad motherfucker. People forget that Chuck was 6'4" 6'5" on a good day and the nigga averaged double digit rebounds EVERY year of his career except his rookie year (8.6). Lets see the pussies in the league do that nowadays.
DestructerX 1 year ago
damn, if barkely was a couple inches taller he could have been an even BIGGER threat lol
mhernandez94 1 year ago
You know Barkley for this team called the Sixers....
sanjurokurosawa 1 year ago
I use to love buying them Brand new "Barkley" Air-Max fresh outta the store before anyone had em.
Triton88Keyz 1 year ago
Insane
Defender80s 1 year ago
most powerful rebounder ive ever seen, even your 7 foot tall
reverend07 1 year ago
Ahhh..my fav player...sir charles even defied dr. j when he came to philly...it was a new day when he came to the sixers....he brought so much energy and vitalitiy to a city that was falling asleep after winning a title....he was controversial, abusive towards teammates and reporters, but we loved him. he was us. philly. loud, aggressive, but productive....25 and 12....at 6'4 1/2....he was a beast.
dazamaru 1 year ago
Sir Charleys Barkley wouldve destroyed tim duncan
pacman491 1 year ago 2
damn his so skinny
scoza 1 year ago
@scoza
dude he is probably pushing 260 how much should he weigh
dirkofyork 1 year ago
the move on kareem at the end was sick.
Fucking Legendary.
narutohearts99 1 year ago
this song is GAY!
deepdriedspam 1 year ago
@deepdriedspam lol how is this song gay when you have 112 on your channel?
mhernandez94 1 year ago
t-mobile plug.
dopeandwack 1 year ago
Alright the quality of basketball games were not this bad in the 90s...
OfficerInfusion 1 year ago
Sir Charles...The MVP!
dandao022macdedo 1 year ago
Greatest sixers
1. Wilt Chamberlain
2. Charles Barkley
3. Dr. J
4. Moses malone
Paragon231 1 year ago 3
@Paragon231
how bout a.i ?
dizzyy2k8 1 year ago
@Paragon231 I love Sir Charles, I've been a Suns fan since the late '80's, but Dr. J was a better player, overall!
copenhusker13 1 year ago
God i miss those days.......
TheGiba7 1 year ago
OMG, do you see those elbows, knees, and body contact? Thats how basketball use to be played. If Lebron played back then, he wouldn't stand a chance. He would come out with a gash and blood all over him.
jbombk 1 year ago 3
@jbombk hahahaha, your funny...Lebron is a tank of muscle...he would have slammed a fat burrito in Barkleys face
NiGhtMaReIDoL 1 year ago
you don't need to put down a person or entire generation to compliment another. I'm pretty sure a full grown 6'8" 260lbs man could hold his own regardless of the era. Chill out son.
LyleLe 1 year ago
its goes to show uu can be great with heart and desire to be great not so much inteligence like jordan wasnt the smartest cooke by he was deceptive
mrqueseyo 1 year ago
he dead reminds me of ron artest te way he dribble and his actual jumpshot
mrqueseyo 1 year ago
yeah except ron ron never averaged 25 and 12, whereas chuck did that several times. he was about 3x the player artest is and that's taking nothing from ron ron. barkley is an all-time great though
senjahcore 1 year ago
Come at Barkley and he would send yo s***t back!
IAmRoyalT 1 year ago
Awesome, thanks for posting
xoxoJOHNxoxo 1 year ago
Damnnnn Chuck dunked in kobe's face ! Thats embarresing
gab87172 1 year ago
why is that?He has dunk on stronger center unlike kobe's weak ass!!!!
MrIamabitch 1 year ago
uh, only if you know nothing about who the fuck barkley was in the NBA. We're talking 25 and 12 for ten + years at 6'4". Barkley dunked on everybody. One of the 10 best athletes ever to play the game.
senjahcore 1 year ago
3:45
FILTHY
jacofp3 2 years ago
For me? til now their still no player that can be compared with Sir Charles. If MJ = Kobe/Wade Magic = LBJ, Shaq = Dwight etc. But for charles??? no one. That's my honorarium to Sir Charles. No player can compare to him for now. why?..
a 6'5-6'6 "Power Forward"
can run the break and even can handle the ball.
Can't be called a "round mound of rebound" for a undersize 4.
can shoot midrange jumper
a good defensive player
and most of all he brings fun to the game.
skipper00718 2 years ago 41
@skipper00718 MAYBE Andre Iguadalla?
clownbaby83 2 years ago
@skipper00718 maybe Jason Maxiell if he had at least 30 minutes per game..looks quiet simmilar with size and hustle
paparazis 2 years ago
@skipper00718 Chuck Hayes =O =P
H0lyPh3n0m 1 year ago
@skipper00718 i would say chuck hayes, but he aint as near as good as barkley was
roobbiinn 1 year ago
@skipper00718 i agree with all that...but lbj = magic??? lebron is way stronger than magic (and magic is more talented that lebron)
migueltxo69 1 year ago
@skipper00718
Well maybe prime Lamar Odom could be consiered by a naw Sir Charles
kareem87said5 1 year ago
@skipper00718 uhhhh u forgot ABOUT lARRY jOHNSON
MasWonAhtt 1 year ago
@skipper00718 There will never be another 6`4 3/4 just below 6`5 Power Forward or Post Player as Dominant as Barkley. EVER!
Defender80s 1 year ago 2
@skipper00718 blake griffin is a bigger version of sir charles handles the ball can run the break and shoot mid range brings fun and excitement to game and pree good defence
yt2catv 1 year ago
@skipper00718 the one closest right now is Blake Griffin
no hate plz
conanbdetective 1 year ago
@skipper00718 what has rebound to do with size, have u ever seen his rebounding stats, com on kid dont talk if u have no plan!
Sused97 10 months ago
@Sused97 if you watched the finals..it can mean a lot...rondo a great rebounder had no chance against gasol. c'mon kid.
drek100sm 9 months ago
@drek100sm u have no plan what are u talkin, barkley always rebounded against bigger guys, U should watch more finals, KID!
Sused97 9 months ago
@Sused97 Yes but look at him...hes raw power..he doesnt have height he has a lot of body. size means a lot. and your last statement was irrelevant.
drek100sm 9 months ago
@drek100sm no
No it wasnt, cause with size i meant height not mass, thats also the reason why i wrote that.... i somebody had unbelivable strenght, cleverness or bodyathletism, he can compete with taller guys especially in the nba, look at kevin love, hes also not the tallest, but he has the best round IQ in the league.....
Sused97 9 months ago
@Sused97 wow!!!! im not evn going to argue anymore so jus dnt write back.
drek100sm 9 months ago
@drek100sm no
No it wasnt, cause with size i meant height not mass, thats also the reason why i wrote that.... if somebody has unbelivable strenght, cleverness or bodyathletism, he can compete with taller guys especially in the nba, look at kevin love, hes also not the tallest, but he has the best round IQ in the league.....
Sused97 9 months ago
@skipper00718 i grew up watching barkley i think the main reason he cant be duplicated is because you may never see a 6'5 power forward ever again...i dont think barkley himself could have played the 4 in todays nba guys are just way to big and to athletic..i think a huge part of the reason charles was able to do what he did even back in the 90's was because the refs knew how to swallow the dam whistle and let guys play (physical) jordan,magic and barkley where always my fav players
youz1uglybish 8 months ago
@skipper00718 I think Blake could be the new breed of Charles... plays with the same... violence in his game. Just pure beasting his was to the rim. Charles was my favorite player growing up.
EmveeEss 6 months ago
@skipper00718
butterybeefslinguh 6 months ago
@skipper00718 shaq equal dwight hell no and magic equal lebron fuck nah man, but aint really no body you can compare chuck to or any of these dudes you tryin to compare especially shaq to dwight THE most DOMINANT not the best but most dominant PLAYER ever to dwight, dwight got hops and thats it, which is what allows him to be a good defender, but shaq was feared cause he would try to murder you if you ran up on him in the paint thinkin shit was sweet
butterybeefslinguh 6 months ago
@butterybeefslinguh Fuck that THE MOST DOMINANT PLAYER shit. He is dominant today because the competition is complete shit. If Howard played Shaq in his prime he would be a stain on the floor. Not to mention guys like Ewing, Kemp, Mutombo, Olajuwon, Rodman. He would have firm 2 rebounds average against them. Most dominant my ass.
petar1shuwack 5 months ago
@skipper00718 Round mound of rebound-Best PF of all time and most entertaining basketball player that ever lived.
petar1shuwack 5 months ago 2
Pg-Magic
Sg-Kobe
Sf-Bird
Pf-Duncan
C-Wilt
Raiders108 2 years ago
this is the list
StealinKills 2 years ago
SG HIS AIRNESS!!!!
ESPNhilite 2 years ago
Its good that they showed Barkley for 1 min at Philly, where we spent 80% of his career and was in his prime. Not him old in Phoenix and Houston.
WBmilkmandan 2 years ago
@WBmilkmandan
He won MVP in Phoenix. Hardly old.
RenewalOfAllThings 2 years ago
charles first year in pheonix was his prime.
MrIamabitch 1 year ago
@MrIamabitch charles' prime was from 1987-1993.. after 1993 he was not the same(because of injuries) though he is still one of the best at that time.
hettyray 1 year ago
Sir Charles was the man,and i don´t care if he has rings or not..Force of nature..
shusca2 2 years ago 2
Great CB34 was really great!!!
igor3434 2 years ago
my fav five
pg-penny
sg-mj
sf-bird
pf-charles
c-shaq
goudz23 2 years ago
it's Where you From by Rick Ross
gunos858 2 years ago
What is this song called???!!!!???
lumpidge 2 years ago
man.. he's a beast
aldencloyd 2 years ago
shuting an every thonk fotyr seven
DIEGO141110 2 years ago
pushing the admiral, throwing the ball at shaq's head... and then finally takes it out on the mascot! sir charles, still the man. i'm gonna dig up my vhs...
samshinraymon 2 years ago
Not to forget picking up Shaq like a waste basket and throwing him to the ground. Then Laimbeer etc
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Man those blocks are really a disgrace in your face! And that's fo sho!
nightrage32 2 years ago 22
БОГ !!!!!!!
FromThessalonika 2 years ago
Красава))
Albert1990ful 2 years ago
why was he pushing the admiral?
narutohearts99 2 years ago
Cause Admiran had to switch off to guard him.
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Great vid...wack music...
spitnificent 2 years ago 3
whats the name of ths song???
kirichenko87 2 years ago
trash
aveo85 2 years ago
name of song???
2showstopper1 2 years ago
Hakeem was deadly, and maybe the best 5 on defense ever. He was also a great rebounder, when he needed to be. I don't think Hakeen was so good on offense as many people think. He wasn't a great finisher. He needed to have plays set up for him & had a mediocre jump shot. Robinson, Shaq & Wilt all had better offensive games. I don't want to take away from Hakeen's talents--I think he was the best defensive player ever. On offense, he's merely brilliant.
sinjinthule 2 years ago
R u serious ... Hakeem had 1 million moves down the post ... m sure u have not seen his game
RasRas4 2 years ago 2
@sinjinthule wtf?? you don't know about the dream shake? fade away jumpers from the baseline? drop steps? spin moves? hakeem schooled shaq(though a young shaq but still close its peak) in 1995 finals, hakeem schooled robinson in 1995 western conference finals, and schooled ewing in the 1994 finals!
hettyray 1 year ago
My Starting five....Magic,Jordan,bird,barkley,duncan. I know duncan is a so called pf, but ill use him as a center. I would really think about Steve Nash running this team instead of magic, only because i dont need a scorer as a point guard. No body runs the floor better than magic or nash, had to go with magic...5 championships to none.
sleepezfactory 2 years ago
As far as Duncan's position goes, I'm inclined to agree. I know he's almost always listed as a 4 but he really plays more like a 5, especially on defense.
sinjinthule 2 years ago
@sleepezfactory magic,jordan,james,barkley, olajuwon.. i think this would be the most versatile team. all can play multiple positions! and this is really a fast team!
hettyray 1 year ago
@hettyray Swap James for Bird and you got an awesome team
BroomeBlocker4 1 year ago
cool vid, song makes my ears bleed though.
MrHunt35 2 years ago
Mah Starting Five:
1 Charles Barkley(F)
2 Mutumbo(C)
3 Magic Jhonson(PG)
4 Lamar Odom(PF)
5 Chris Paul(SG)....
Emerica687 2 years ago
really man?
SunMan6A6 2 years ago
im sorry but this is a bad lineup
it should be
Barkley at the 4
Magic at the 1
are you serious cp over mj at the 2
the small forward should be ethier david robsoion julius irving or possibly shawn kemp...you could even have mj or scottie pippin and if you have mj at the 3 then have ethier clyde drexler or larry bird at the 2
and at center you should never put mutumbo unless you want your center fouled out in two mins...put the admiral or Ewing cause they were both monsters
tabbrown45 2 years ago
my 5 would b
1.chauncy billups
2.mike
3.charles
4.malone
5.hakeem
woodland1985 2 years ago
CMON MAN! PSSH
1. 2XM.V.P. Steve Nash
2. G.O.A.T. Michael Jordan
3. M.V.P. Charles Barkley
4. 2XM.V.P.Karl Malone
5. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
It's a wrap and 3 of these players do not have a championship ring.
illwill4781 2 years ago
a good lineup would be
jordan
barkley
bird
KG
wilt
beerrun34 2 years ago
You give me Barkley from '86-'93 and I'll have the best forward on the planet.
Wobgoblin 2 years ago 3
point. steph marbury
shoot. steve francis
small. D Wilkins
power. Ben Wallace
center. Chris anderson
when they were all in there prime
unbeatable.
bigbudukadunk666 2 years ago
please this team would be fun to watch but... would NEVER win a championship
timos1980 2 years ago
chris anderson? LMao!! With all the other options. Fuck it that starting 5 may not make playoffs with all 5 having selfish egos. U must be sarcastic with this 1 boy!!
SpeekEZ23 2 years ago
thats probably the WORST lineup ever
beerrun34 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
┏━━━━━━━┓
┏┫ ｜｜｜┣┓ ┏┓
┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫ ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃ ┏━━▇▇▇━━━━━┻━━━━┛ ┃ ▇▇▇ ┃ ▇▇▇ ┗ ┃Ψ┃ ┃ ┃ ┛ ┗
dgt0099 2 years ago
1. Barkley
2. Malone
3. Mchale
4.Garnett
5.Duncan
noelh98 2 years ago 2
1-Barkley
2-Duncan
3-Malone
4-Garnett
5-McHale
6-Webber
AceroySangre 2 years ago 3
mchale is definitely better then duncan and garnett... Cwebb would have been my 6 too
noelh98 2 years ago
I'd rank Garnett #2. I love Duncan's game but seriously, the dude's a center. Howard is really more a 4 then a 5, whatever they try to call him. He should be in the debate. Malone, honestly, gained more from Stockton then the other way around. No disrespect. Karl Malone would have been an all-star anywhere but without Stockton he wouldn't have been all-world.
sinjinthule 2 years ago
garnett over duncan? timmy's won 4 championships!
GDogSamurai 2 years ago
Championships = Teams
Barkle was alone from 1986 to 1992 and had Good but not Great Teams like Duncan the rest of his career. After 1995 he could hardly play do to back injuries (same ones that Bird had in 1988-89 season) and knee problems. A Prime Barkley was something Else. a Top 5-10 Player Impact Wise. Reality Wise!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
read my comment again. I was saying that Duncan was superior to Garnett. I didn't mention anything about Barkley.
GDogSamurai 2 years ago
the same could be applied to Garnett i suppose. he only had 1 really good team in minny and they were the number 1 seed that year.. its not really a diss on duncan because i have him ranked 5th ALL-TIME lol
noelh98 2 years ago
tim d= greatest pf ever. no exclamations. none needed. not even caps.
SpeekEZ23 2 years ago
dennis rodman is the best...haha
edmond130 2 years ago
im with you
beerrun34 2 years ago
weres wilt and kareem
DYLAAN3 2 years ago
i only did power forwards.. wilt and kareem were centers
noelh98 2 years ago
i thought you were doin top bigs
DYLAAN3 2 years ago
great vid and cool info thanks
nesuke 2 years ago
Whats the song called?
xDRxPePPeRx53 2 years ago
FG% and Field Goal Attempts Per Game are As Important or Even MORE than PPG.Barkley from the PF Positon is the Most Efficient FOCAL Scorer Ever. McHale second.
Barkley did not have Stockton nor a Pick & Roll System To Live Off neither did he have the Greatest Passing Forward = Bird, Tiny Archibald, nor DJ, prime Ainge, Walton (one of the Best C Passers Ever) or Maxwell YET HE SHOT: 58.13% (21.6 PPG) Season and Play-Offs: 55.13% (22.5 PPG) 2-Point FG! that is Shaq-like INSIDE! Shaq-like!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
You are right, FG% is more important than PPG because it means that if you took as many shots as a leading scorer, you would have more points, etc.
However, I never argued for McHale, or even for PPG. I always stayed true to my argument that Karl Maline had better career total numbers, man. That's all im sayin
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
FG% and Field Goal Attempts Per Game are As Important or Even MORE than PPG.Barkley is from the PF Positon is the Most Efficient FOCAL Scorer Ever.McHale second.
Barkley did not have Stockton nor a Pick&Roll System Fast Paced to Live Off neither did he have the Greatest Passing Forward = Bird, Tiny Archibald, nor DJ, prime Ainge, Walton (one of the Best C Passers Ever) or Maxwell YET HE SHOT58.13% (21.6 PPG) Season and Play-Offs: 55.13% (22.5 PPG) 2-Point FG! that is Shaq-like INSIDE!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Wrong! Barkley averaged more Rebounds per Game, more Assist Per Game, more Steals Per Game, more Blocks Per Game, was a way more Efficient Scorer FG% per lesser FGAs taken Per Game, As a Focal Scorer only Second in All-Time List 2-Point FG% in the Season to Shaq! (58% season and 55% play-offs, Malone 52% season and a pathetic 46% play-offs), Higher EFF, Higher PER in their primes and before CHucks injuries 1985-1995 Barkley WAY BETTER THAN MALONE. Anyone who lived to see it knows this. Bye!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Charles Barkley was kool then and now. Barkley, a ledgend forever!
garrettthagreat08 2 years ago
Listen man I accept all your arguments because they are all correct and accurate. But mine are too. I respect your opinion and the way you put it forward, and I respect that you think Charles was the greatest. I just wish he would have played longer, or won some rings so as to let there be no doubt who's the greatest PF of all time. There's no doubt there's ever been anyone like him and that's what makes him so special and that's why he is my 2nd favorite player of all time.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Comment removed
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
My son asked me who is da best PF ever He said Mark Jackson (dick rider) said Tim Duncan was I had to think way back then I said Tim Duncan has the rings and rightly so he played wit good teams and has a good coach,but son da best PF I ever seen (considering he was only according to his first coach Billy Cunningham 6'5 wit sneakers) is Charles Barkley dis guy was a freak of nature strong bold talented a strait up b-ball player.If he woulda been 6'8 WHEW! I agree wit AceroySangre C.B is the best!
mookeychase0907 2 years ago
AceroySangre 2 years ago
r u retarded ???? barkleys better
511christian 2 years ago
Aceroy: I love Charles Barkley, he is who I wanna be like, he plays the way I wanna play, but when considering what the PF position is supposed to be and career accomplishments, I still think it's Tim Duncan or Karl Malone. Tim has better fundamentals of basketball, has more rings, more MVPs, and was defenitely the leader of all the Spurs team. Tim Duncan wasn't always as slow as he is now. He had great speed and quickness and strength and post moves. He's more of what a PF is.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Karl Malone better than Barkley at what FT shooting? Ha! Thats about it.
Barkley is 1 onf only 2 Players to be in the Top 10 EFF and PER Player of All TIme in both the Play-Offs and he didn`t need no Duncan, Stockton, Pippen, McHale-Parish-Maxweel-DJ, Jabbar-Worthy-McADoo-Wilks or a Full Squad like the Pistons or Blazers to make it to the finals against all odds! A Prime 1985 to 1995 before his back and knee injuries Barkey was way better than Malone and Duncan by Miles!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Malone is 2nd all time in scoring. That defenitrly shows his greatness, and has more rebouds than Barkley. Like I said. Talent wise Barkley was probably better than Duncan and Malone, but Malone and Duncan have done more in their careers or have better numbers than Barkley.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
¿Better Numbers? He averaged 11.7 RPG for the Season & 12. 9 RPG in the Play-Offs clearly a better rebounder than Malone. A Way superior Passer and Game Creator than Malone. Assiter aswell. Superior Scorer and More Efficient FG% than Malone. Barkley`s 2-Point FG% only comparable to Shaq and Gilmore for the Season (21.6 PPG on 58.13% and 22.5 PPG on 55.13% in the Play-Offs while Malone`s is 51.9% & 46% Pathetic in the Play-Offs). Barkley is 1 of only 2 Players in The All-Time Top 10 EFF/PER (MJ)
AceroySangre 2 years ago
these are averages. Malone had more total points and rebounds than Barkley and longevity is another measure of greatness. Barkley is my 2nd favorite player of all time (MJ) but stats and accomplishments don't lie. If Barkley wouldn't of had his injuries and played longer, or if he had won a ring or two then there would be no questioning who is better, but he didn't. Duncan was able to lead his team to 4 rings and Malone dominated for 15+ years. You're right though Barkley had more overall skills
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Longevity is a measure of only that, Longevitiy. It does not measure Skill, Impact or Level of Game. He was better he has a Higher PER and EFF than Malone (between 1985 and 1995 even more evident) and not to mention he did not have the Greatest Pure Point Guard Passing To Him in a System Designed for him to Score. Barkley had to Score on his own, design his shot and shoot way higher FG% and was the 1st Player to get the MVP other any other player not named Bird-Magic-MJ
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Longevity is also a measure of greatness, especially when you continue to play great throughout you longevity. You're right, the offense did run through Malone and Stockton defenitely helped, but it doesn't take from Malone. You can't deny what Malone did and what Duncan is doing, defenitely give them argument for best PF of all time. Malone also got an MVP with Jordan in the league, and Duncan has more MVPs than both of them.
I'm sorry but can you please explain PER and EFF to me?
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Longevity is a measure of no injuries and taking care of his body it has nothing to do with BEING MORE SKILLED, HAVING MORE IMPACT OR BEING A BETTER PLAYER . Imagine we both play and you are better than me between ages 22 and 32 but you suffer injuries and from that point i show as better as you, does that mean i was better than you? (even myself would know you are better than me) Nope it just means you where more fit and less injury prone thats it: PER and EFF impact of player per minute per -
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Okay but think about this: Don't you think tht with a body like his 6"4" 270 lbs would take a toll on his knees. Sure he was unstoppable because of how big and fast he was, but it would eventually catch up to him. Longevirty is one thing, but to continue to be among the league best like Malone did for 15+ years shows greatness. It would be different if he continued to play but not with the same numbers, but he maintained his stats throughout his career.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Anyone who saw Barkley play between ages 22 to about 32 (total prime) knows that Barkley was better. Anyone!. Barkley was a Better player in pretty much every aspect but FT shooting, Barkley could take games over, had 40-20 games in the play-offs while Malone was dependant on a system. Malone could not do shit on his own without Stockton and the Sloan System and he shot pathetic in the play-offs (Clutch Time!). I applaude Malone for his longevity but player he aint Charles. Period!
AceroySangre 2 years ago
I never said longevity shows better skills, but think about this: If you showcase your skills once, everyone knows you have them, but you haven't proven that you are great, or that your career is great. Barkley had more overall skills than both Duncan and Malone, but how many players had more skills than someone like Bird, but aren't recognized as greater? Skills doesn't equal greatness. It's a combination of awards, accomplishments, rings, career totals, milestones, and also skills.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Player Efficiency and EFF show the Real Level of the Player not Popularity Contests, MVPs or Shooting 25 FGA PG while not even making the 50% mark.
Barkley is found in the Top 10 EFF Players and PER Per Minute of Efficiency for Play-Offs and Season: that is where Wilt, Russel, Big O, Bird, Baylor, Magic, Jordan, Shaq and very few others are found.
A 1985 to 1995 Barkley > Malone by Miles
Ths is not a race of age but of who was better and Barkley was better. End
AceroySangre 2 years ago
You make it sound like Barkley is light years away from other PF. Malome and Duncan are defenitely up there and pretty close.
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
As a career and stats he is right there around Duncan/Malone probably better. In terms of longevity ofcourse he aint Malone etc but if you talk about a Prime vs Prime. Barkley owns! In the Play-Offs Barkley really could take games over on his own something Duncan and Malone couldn`t. They where more consistant, more disciplined off court and took care of their bodies etc but they could not reach the level of a Prime Barkley. Barkley is scecond in 40 Pts-20 Rbd games to Wilt in the Play-Offs
AceroySangre 2 years ago
As career stats Malone is better, and in career Duncan is better because f his MVPs and 4 rings and finals MVPs. As far as prime vs prime Barkley was better and has more skills overall. But when you say who is the best of all time, everything goes into it, not just prime vs prime or skills. it has to do with skills, prime, but also, longevity, accomplishments, etc. you know?
Personally I would take Barkley.
PG: Magic
SG: MJ
SF: Bird
PF: Charles
C: Hakeem
(personally))
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Career Yes, Stats No. Career ofcourse Barkley was the most hated player in his time, coaches, refs, commisoners etc all hated Barkley etc even the 1990 MVP was stolen by Magic and his nice smile because Barkley deserved it and kept being underrated.Championships just say you had the better team. Just like George Best played in Whales and did not go to the World Cup doesnt mean he was the Best European Player in the 60s by Miles. Barkleys Stats, EFF and PER clearly show that he was the Best`.
AceroySangre 2 years ago
Malone has better stats than Barkley man. Not averages, totals. More rebounds and points, the two most important stats for a PF. And Duncan has had a better career than both Malone and Barkley. 4 rings 2 MVPs, 3 finals MVPs
DaBusDriva92 2 years ago
Wrong! Barkley averaged more Rebounds per Game, more Assist Per Game, more Steals Per Game, more Blocks Per Game, was a way more Efficient Scorer FG% per lesser FGAs taken Per Game, As a Focal Scorer only Second in 2-Point FG% in the Season (58% season and 55% play-offs, Malone 52% season and 46% play-offs), Highre EFF, Higher PER in their primes and before CHucks injuries 1985-1995 Barkley WAY BETTER THAN MALONE. Anyone who lived to see it knows this. Bye!
AceroySangre 2 years ago