Filming might not be strictly about rules, but some rules come into existence for a reason. A lot of ppl today ignorantly break the rules and their stuff is nigh incomprehensible. If Orson Welles took time to try and understand the 180 degree rule when he started out, then who do you think you are to totally ignore it?
@NelsonStJames I think that part of the problem is to think of it as a rule. If you don't know what makes sense, you suck and that's all there is to it.
@SenorCajones you're right, but there is a sort of arrogance of ignorance to comes into play when it comes to "artistic endeavors" that you would never see in other professions. People think they can do anything because it's all personal expression. I know people who want to write movies and have never watched any of the classics. I know ppl who want to write and never read books. People want to make movies and haven't watched anything but MTV videos.
No it would not, if you are looking at the diagram and it violates the rule, rotate the line 90 degrees. So the guy behind the desk is in the upper left of the circle and the other to people are on the upper and lower right of the circle. Make sence?
Filming and mediaproduction isn't about rules or the geometric law! It's all about creativity and factors which the movie depends on! So plz, delete this vid. !
Question - what if, in my scene, there's THREE people conversing instead of just two? There's a man sitting at a desk, then two other men standing a reasonable distance away and a feet feet from eachother. To have an over-the-shoulder shot of one guy speaking to the man at the desk, then doing the same with the other guy, would it be the same, or would it violate the 180 degree rule?
For dancing and party scenes, it is fun to break this rule and do a 360 pan! I do it all the time. Preferably fast enough to cause a blur, lol. It's part of the story!
Apparently you don't believe in the rules of grammar either.
Anyone who "doesn't believe" in this rule or thinks that filmmakers just ignore it obviously doesn't know the first thing about film. This is fundamental stuff. Most filmmakers don't break this rule EVER, and those that do break the rule do so for a reason and are usually EXPERIENCED filmmakers who make the conscious choice to do so.
Just ask Stephen King what happens when you break the 180 rule.
like in the matrix when they do time stop and do a 360 degree rotation. i know they did it for a reason Im just saying that even if this is a great rule to follow which it is and i will usually follow it i still dont think its a rule. its more like a guideline. and even if i am not a good film maker i do have a TON of expirience and never even heard of or noticed this rule. as far as youtube knows i have more expirience than you because i posted videos which i have spent hours on.
Hi That's great info... but you broke the "rule of thirds" on the first opening shots. This sends mixed messages as you are explaining how to do stuff but not actually doing some of the things you have already demonstrated in the past. Cheers Mark
Stanley Kubrick broke the 180 degree rule in The Shining when Jack Nicholson is talking to the waiter. He did this to create a sense of disorientation and make the viewer feel unease. Martin Scorsese also did so in The Departed when Matt Damon and his friend are sitting on a bench. He did this to foreshadow events to come.
Here's another 180 degree Rule Of Film Making: Periodically swing around 180 degrees and look over your shoulder to see if the people who lent you the money to make your film and who will never see a dime back are approaching you to find out when they'll see their dimes back.
K.I.S.S. remember keep it simple stupid... keep the driver in the drivers seat, and the passenger in the passenger's seat. Don't cross them over. At first I had no idea what she was saying, but I know you keep the actors on their respective sides, Larry King is always on the left.
"Larry King is always on the left" was the point I did not, but was supposed to get from this video! Luckily I found your comment! THANK YOU! no for real...THANK YOU!
You can break this rule, but you have to show the camera actually crossing the line. To keep the audience orientated, you have to actually pan out behind one of the people.
This is a perfectly simple rule. Even with this explanation. Which yes could be better explained, so i do agree with anuclearfamily on that one. They should of not brushed over the "what's happens if you break this rule."
What she's trying to say is that you shouldn't flip flop either of the two subject. If you start out with John and the left and Jane on the right, you should consistently have John on the left and Jane on the right, whether it be over the shoulder or whatever. Don't go past the 180 and put John on the right of the frame and Jane on the left.
The rationale is that it tends to confuse or disorient the audience.
Good explanation of the rule but the video should go more into detail as to why breaking the rule is bad and how it might confuse us. The narrator rushes over this section as does the example movie scene.
Good explanation of the rule but the video should go more into detail as to why breaking the rule is bad and how it might confuse us. The narrator rushes over this section as does the example movie scene.
these are all very basic rules. HOWEVER, they are not creative rules to follow. try new things, if it doesn't seem to work, try a different way. no one should follow 'videomaker' too religiously.
Fair enough, but surely you can agree that before you break the "rules" you should understand the "rules," so that when you do it, it's a conscious choice and not an accident.... Cheers.
@HRPoodersmith Everything has rules and laws that we must adhere to. For example the law of gravity is one we cannot break and these basic rules help us keep balance and design (like the rule of thirds). Unless you are trying to create a world where nothing makes sense or create tension, then by all means break the rules.
i agree it can confuse people sometimes but other times the camera can swing 360 around two people perhaps in an argument so cuts are not nessesary and it can be an interesting shot
TONS of films break the 180 rule, for an over the shoulder shot, it doesn't necessarily confuse the audience with 2 people, its when you have 3 people in a situation that it becomes more difficult.
i get this. basically stay on one side of the action and don't go on both or cut the video from 1 to the other, or else the scene would look as though it flipped backward.
unless of course you're filming the whole thing, when actually circling the field would be able to show more of the area and give a more dramatic effect (matrix).
I think that the sync your audio rule should be observed here. If I can syn some mannequin with an apple's lips, then you can sync up this footage.
SenorCajones 1 week ago
I learned this by watching Paprika
RRYtbea 2 months ago
@RRYtbea The anime?
Best,
The Videomaker Team
videomaker 2 months ago
Filming might not be strictly about rules, but some rules come into existence for a reason. A lot of ppl today ignorantly break the rules and their stuff is nigh incomprehensible. If Orson Welles took time to try and understand the 180 degree rule when he started out, then who do you think you are to totally ignore it?
NelsonStJames 3 months ago
@NelsonStJames Exactly, you have to understand the rules before you can know when to break them.
Best,
The Videomaker Team
videomaker 2 months ago
@NelsonStJames I think that part of the problem is to think of it as a rule. If you don't know what makes sense, you suck and that's all there is to it.
SenorCajones 1 week ago
@SenorCajones you're right, but there is a sort of arrogance of ignorance to comes into play when it comes to "artistic endeavors" that you would never see in other professions. People think they can do anything because it's all personal expression. I know people who want to write movies and have never watched any of the classics. I know ppl who want to write and never read books. People want to make movies and haven't watched anything but MTV videos.
NelsonStJames 1 week ago
@Prim3StaR
No it would not, if you are looking at the diagram and it violates the rule, rotate the line 90 degrees. So the guy behind the desk is in the upper left of the circle and the other to people are on the upper and lower right of the circle. Make sence?
dalmation257 4 months ago
Filming and mediaproduction isn't about rules or the geometric law! It's all about creativity and factors which the movie depends on! So plz, delete this vid. !
1997nk 5 months ago
"As we learned in math class, the circumference of a circle is 360 degrees." This line had me laughing sooo hard! Silly film makers.
welcomeblack 6 months ago
Comment removed
chabayonique 6 months ago
Question - what if, in my scene, there's THREE people conversing instead of just two? There's a man sitting at a desk, then two other men standing a reasonable distance away and a feet feet from eachother. To have an over-the-shoulder shot of one guy speaking to the man at the desk, then doing the same with the other guy, would it be the same, or would it violate the 180 degree rule?
Prim3StaR 6 months ago
For dancing and party scenes, it is fun to break this rule and do a 360 pan! I do it all the time. Preferably fast enough to cause a blur, lol. It's part of the story!
SnowboardSecretsTV 10 months ago
How do you get sponsored? :D
JingchengZhao 10 months ago
And the action does not always stay on the same side of the camera, keeping the action in frame at all times trumps everything else.
Crimefighter 10 months ago
Doesn't apply to sports. Football, basketball, baseball, and WWE there's cameras all over the arena not on one side.
Crimefighter 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. make a wish
2. close your hand (fist)
3. put your hand (fist) over your heart for 5 seconds
4. put this on three videos
5. tomorrow will be the best day ever
ferdericsworld 1 year ago
i had no idea what she was talking about until the video showed the positions of the cameras...
DiSoNeNcBoI 1 year ago
Everyone should learn the Basic techniques.
Picto58 1 year ago
not essentially 'rules' more like 'guidelines' to me
Mr12toe 1 year ago
Stop at 00:42. lol!!! Nice vid by the way.
btm96 1 year ago
wish i knew this rule when I tried making my first action scene haha. Nice tutorial
damoesta 1 year ago
what if Im doing a chase?
reck101101 1 year ago
I heard that the audience is more forgiving if you break the 180 rule on a car chase is that true?
8888Eastman 1 year ago
woman a is cute.
gwaga56 1 year ago
Im pretty sure That 70's show has broken this rule:)
still2weirdfoU 1 year ago
All those mathematical precision are useless. The point is: when you film your actors from one side, dont change it during the action.
Roger007Poore 2 years ago 6
I concur. This should be common sense.
Cstrife234 2 years ago
Comment removed
bobish14 2 years ago
Apparently you don't believe in the rules of grammar either.
Anyone who "doesn't believe" in this rule or thinks that filmmakers just ignore it obviously doesn't know the first thing about film. This is fundamental stuff. Most filmmakers don't break this rule EVER, and those that do break the rule do so for a reason and are usually EXPERIENCED filmmakers who make the conscious choice to do so.
Just ask Stephen King what happens when you break the 180 rule.
giphangster 2 years ago 3
like in the matrix when they do time stop and do a 360 degree rotation. i know they did it for a reason Im just saying that even if this is a great rule to follow which it is and i will usually follow it i still dont think its a rule. its more like a guideline. and even if i am not a good film maker i do have a TON of expirience and never even heard of or noticed this rule. as far as youtube knows i have more expirience than you because i posted videos which i have spent hours on.
bobish14 2 years ago
Sure, dude. You have a "ton" of experience at this, yet you've never heard of the 180 degree rule. Absolutely. Good luck with that.
giphangster 2 years ago
Look at his profile... he's like 9 years old. Let him brag about his TON of film making experience.
jameskguen 2 years ago
She said "Unless you're doing it for an effect".....
1995jordan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your rule is something you might follow. But who cares, your video sucks. And why do you follow rules? Rules are made to be broken.
powerhouston 2 years ago
dude u must be really dgaf
kookkid6969 2 years ago
Hi That's great info... but you broke the "rule of thirds" on the first opening shots. This sends mixed messages as you are explaining how to do stuff but not actually doing some of the things you have already demonstrated in the past. Cheers Mark
bentleybloke 2 years ago 2
what software did u use....
perang123 2 years ago
lol at the diagram @ 1:51...
syncy2 2 years ago
chopper head
flameknight7 2 years ago
I've noticed this this before, but I didn't actually realize it was a "rule". And where would you want to break this rule for an "effect"?
RockN311 2 years ago
NEVER! DEAR GOD, WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT BREAK THE 180! WATCH MY VID and u will c what I am talking about!
eaglei23 2 years ago
Stanley Kubrick broke the 180 degree rule in The Shining when Jack Nicholson is talking to the waiter. He did this to create a sense of disorientation and make the viewer feel unease. Martin Scorsese also did so in The Departed when Matt Damon and his friend are sitting on a bench. He did this to foreshadow events to come.
floopaloop22 2 years ago
I was just saying that she over explained it.
adonian 3 years ago
Here's another 180 degree Rule Of Film Making: Periodically swing around 180 degrees and look over your shoulder to see if the people who lent you the money to make your film and who will never see a dime back are approaching you to find out when they'll see their dimes back.
oriolebird 3 years ago 24
lmao!
qbcougar7 3 years ago
I appreciate the information... thanks!
LJM603 3 years ago
This seemed to be natural to me.. but it's really nice to know! :) thanks
tucumalo 3 years ago
idk, look at michael bay, he tends to go a full 360. degrees. its not always about the rules, more like make it sick.
juan909s 3 years ago
Thank you to those who explained the video, because otherwise I'd still be scratching my head trying to figure out what she was trying to explain.
12thDecember 3 years ago
tht was very confusing
SuburbianKnights 3 years ago
this tutorial was not thorough enough....
9ecrofatled 3 years ago
K.I.S.S. remember keep it simple stupid... keep the driver in the drivers seat, and the passenger in the passenger's seat. Don't cross them over. At first I had no idea what she was saying, but I know you keep the actors on their respective sides, Larry King is always on the left.
adonian 3 years ago
"Larry King is always on the left" was the point I did not, but was supposed to get from this video! Luckily I found your comment! THANK YOU! no for real...THANK YOU!
Untamed2 3 years ago
You can break this rule, but you have to show the camera actually crossing the line. To keep the audience orientated, you have to actually pan out behind one of the people.
bigbadmetalead 3 years ago 3
This is a perfectly simple rule. Even with this explanation. Which yes could be better explained, so i do agree with anuclearfamily on that one. They should of not brushed over the "what's happens if you break this rule."
ClearedToLand7 3 years ago 3
how can you 'not get it'? its pretty simple
cartoonmarc 3 years ago 4
What she's trying to say is that you shouldn't flip flop either of the two subject. If you start out with John and the left and Jane on the right, you should consistently have John on the left and Jane on the right, whether it be over the shoulder or whatever. Don't go past the 180 and put John on the right of the frame and Jane on the left.
The rationale is that it tends to confuse or disorient the audience.
clarenancy 3 years ago 2
i really don't get this rule
SaxonHarold 3 years ago 7
Its a simple rule to understand but she complicated it with over explanation and two many examples at the same time.
check: Moviemaking Techniques180 Degree Rule, here on you tube, "it's nice and simple!"
Themba88 3 years ago 2
Good explanation of the rule but the video should go more into detail as to why breaking the rule is bad and how it might confuse us. The narrator rushes over this section as does the example movie scene.
anuclearfamily 3 years ago 6
Good explanation of the rule but the video should go more into detail as to why breaking the rule is bad and how it might confuse us. The narrator rushes over this section as does the example movie scene.
anuclearfamily 3 years ago 3
I didn't get it either.
YTdave2006 3 years ago 3
...this was very badly explained! I'd give it 5 out of 25...
SCTV 3 years ago
very well.......
Oyotunji 3 years ago
sweet!
LukeSchneider77 3 years ago
i like this video its very helpful
Austin17056 3 years ago
these are all very basic rules. HOWEVER, they are not creative rules to follow. try new things, if it doesn't seem to work, try a different way. no one should follow 'videomaker' too religiously.
HRPoodersmith 3 years ago
Fair enough, but surely you can agree that before you break the "rules" you should understand the "rules," so that when you do it, it's a conscious choice and not an accident.... Cheers.
videomaker 3 years ago 74
What does it matter whether it is an accident or conscious if you get a good effect?
2yng2di 3 years ago 2
@videomaker
Even though in interviews breaking this rule is a bad desicion.
It is ok to break it during sports or shooting scenes if the jump is not too strong.
TeTRoSeX 1 year ago
@HRPoodersmith Everything has rules and laws that we must adhere to. For example the law of gravity is one we cannot break and these basic rules help us keep balance and design (like the rule of thirds). Unless you are trying to create a world where nothing makes sense or create tension, then by all means break the rules.
marshallgraphic 1 year ago
@HRPoodersmith love your comment, to be honest i find videomaker a bit...
i mean their rules ARE VERY BASIC! but still correct
UUSAAE123 1 year ago
@HRPoodersmith
how about framing the host CORRECTLY! She ( 0:26 ) has like a lot of room above her head!
moleculaelectronica 1 year ago 2
i agree it can confuse people sometimes but other times the camera can swing 360 around two people perhaps in an argument so cuts are not nessesary and it can be an interesting shot
RonocBrosnany 3 years ago 3
I see... Very nice video
nebenator 3 years ago
TONS of films break the 180 rule, for an over the shoulder shot, it doesn't necessarily confuse the audience with 2 people, its when you have 3 people in a situation that it becomes more difficult.
GrynHelix 4 years ago 5
i get this. basically stay on one side of the action and don't go on both or cut the video from 1 to the other, or else the scene would look as though it flipped backward.
unless of course you're filming the whole thing, when actually circling the field would be able to show more of the area and give a more dramatic effect (matrix).
mariomguy 4 years ago 3
Very useful!
Archii25 4 years ago
Thats good! I never realized that, I'm just happy the shooting plans I had for my one future horror movie don'thave to be tweaked because of this.
youngdirectorgames 4 years ago 3
Awesome.
BlackLionFilms 4 years ago 2
Good refresher. Never thought of it as a circle.
grenaldo83 4 years ago 5
noob... but cool
poonur45 4 years ago
Very cool
turretje 4 years ago 5