Added: 5 years ago
From: noitv
Views: 2,769
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are wrong with michael moore

  • The Banking elite, they are the ones who control all, they print also print the MONEY!

  • who owns the news?

  • Moor of less

  • This is all well known

  • ummmm....7 of the highjackers are not alive. that is a complete hoax of a story and alex jones needs to cite his sources, because nowhere in this does he give you dates or websites. he shows you pictures of websites, but what are they?

  • ummmm.. why not do some research? This stuff is easy to find, just google for the headlines! Or, you can just go to martiallaw911(dot)info. I've studied 9/11 for years, and I can tell you that Alex Jones's comments are very accurate. As national intelligence guru (and former US Spy) Robert Steele has shown people, anyone that bothers to research this issue in-depthly will certainly see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

  • No. The hijackers are staying at Elvis' house. I saw it on the internet. Alex jones is smart and a great talker (which is why he has his own show and makes money). He doesn't make money making moderate views. Sources are important but can be manipulated, as we see so often today. Alez jones is very entertaining to me and has been for years. But he is not to be believed 100% of the time.

  • I was not aware that news organizations were manipulating their own news stories... you seem to assume that everyone just gets all their news from Alex Jones's mouth and his site doesn't source back to the very same article; that's quite a logical error! You don't research things before claiming them, do you? For clarification of your original claim, it was the BBC that reported on that. It doesn't take much effort to pull the story up on their site.

  • Sorry, I got you and prezin25 confused. looking over your other recent comment, it appears that you are relying on theorizations on a subject you really know nothing about. I really pitty anyone who chooses knee-jerk reactions to actual in-depth research. Your comments of hyperbole and ad-homs show a painful lack of awareness.

  • google: 9/11 hijackers still alive. the SECOND LINK shows this: tinyurl (dot) com/r5xn

    this isn't rocket science.

  • You have a hard-on for this "I'm smarter than you" facade. Your problem is you only believe sites that agree with your predisposition. Everyone else is therefore wrong. Why? Because you saw it on the internet. Speaking of bias, do you really want to use the BBC as a source? Did also they find Tupac? You do remember that not all of the bastards made it on the plane, right?

  • I believe in doing research before commenting on something; I'm sorry that you do not research issues before commenting on them and interpret that as a "I'm smarter than you facade". Secondly, I research both sides of an issue, because accuracy is much more important to me than being right. Your hyperbole again fails to discredit anything I have offered. The BBC is the largest broadcasting corporation in the world; I fail to see how this is somehow not a credible source.

  • Perhaps if you read the article instead of relying on this knee-jerk reaction you have to this subject, you would know that the men named that are still alive are - accourding to the FBI - dead, since they were on one of the planes. The article clearly explains that this has to do with the named hijackers. This isn't very hard if you'd actually try to make an attempt to educate yourself on this subject.

  • Are you telling me that there is a another Muhammad out there. Don't forget that many muslim extremists change their names to fit their ideology. So you believe in the remote control plane theory? What about the phone calls made from these planes? What about their accounts of the takeover? Do you absorb what you hear, or do you evaluate, critique, and think for yourself?

  • by your poor example (I can still tell you never read the article. Good job!), if the FBI showed your name and picture and said you're dead, then I guess it's just a coincidence that someone else looks exactly like you and has your name.

  • No. Honestly i skimmed through the article. Why? Because the site was obviously biased from the get go. Sure, the FBI lies and I think there are things that the media need not know. But you think the gov could pull this off and not have anyone leak it?! Think about how many lesser secret projects have been leaked. The gov is run by people. People themselves would not beable to keep it tucked away.

  • Yhat's what i mean. The leprechaun thing was an analogy (since you didn't get it). ANYONE can make a convincing argument and site sources. It's called PROPAGANDA. What really identifies a person is who will take a bite of the bullshit sandwich. How did it taste? Then there are people like me who are ready to hand you a toothpick and some mouthwash.

  • I've yet to see anyone prove wrong what the BBC mentioned. Your analogy was a straw-man. What you fail to understand, is that when someone cites sources, you look at them and see if they match what was said. As for a bullshit sandwich.. whoo boy.. you must love the BS sandwiches Bush feeds you :)

  • It clearly states in the article that the hijackers names and faces were released all over the world. Your rhetorical question about there being another guy named Muhammad, falls on its face. Cognitive Dissonance is the term. Moving on, the second thing you mentioned is ANOTHER straw-man! The Manhattan Project involved 130,000 people! No massive leaks.

  • Same with Operation Northwoods, MKULTRA, MKNAOMI, MKDELTA, ECHELON, ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD, CHATTER, last but not least, don't forget Operation Paperclip (1,600 people), and the Tuskegee Study (uh..?)

  • None of which invovled killing 3,000 American civilians. If this guy is still alive, do you realize that the media from all over the world would be all over it. Much like Jones, the media is about controversy (real or not). Dems get more free passes than repubs. This president can't even fire his own attorneys (which he doesn't have to give reasons for) w/o being pistol wipped.

  • But lets break down this vid. Connection to the Bin Laden's isn't a connection to osama. The family kicked him out. The saudi connection goes all the way back to Kennedy. The victims families (small percentage) started the rumors because of the fear and emotions. The flight of the Saudis never went higher than Dick Clark and no one ever said it was an accident.

  • It is easy to say the Afghan war wasn't real if you weren't there. The FBI and CIA weren't communicating to each other pre-911. Jones' sources are mostly newspapers. Doesn't make it fact. You can easily look up news archives and come up with a million different reasons about a single issue. Why? Because reporters are people. People with opinions and with a boss that wants controversy for bigger ratings. Good news is No news.

  • I can sight a source on the internet that proves leprechauns exist. Must be true. What alex did on the videos is what Michael Moore does, you get half-truths which makes it easier to manipulate the listener. You are way to passionate about something you think you know about. Word of advice:

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule"

  • You are spouting disinformation yet again. This is a common tactic of the ignorant: use a straw-man argument. The subject of leprechauns is quite different from the BBC reporting on 9/11 hijackers still being alive.

  • By the way, do you realize how much moneu Jones' makes? Seen the prices on his site lately? Like i said, he makes money off people like you and you love him for it. You even had to steal the "strawman" thing from him.

    On Alex jones' own site, prisonplanet they call the BBC liars.

  • Wow, you are really out of touch with reality. Look up straw-man argument. Oops, you don't like looking up things, sorry :). I got the term long ago before I even knew who Alex Jones was. You simply can't stop with the straw-man arguments. amazing.

  • By your obscure thinking, since Bush lied about "never hearing about a plan to hijack jets and fly them into buildings", then everything else he says is a lie.

  • By the way, do you realize how much moneu Jones' makes? Seen the prices on his site lately? Like i said, he makes money off people like you and you love him for it. You even had to steal the "strawman" thing from him.

    On Alex jones' own site, prisonplanet they call the BBC liars.

  • again, you reach, cite hyperbole and use a straw-man. Amazing.

  • Alez tried to bank on predicting 911 and saying he warned us. But he has learned that there is more money elsewhere. He is against globalization, but doesn't attack dems who have said they want a one world gov. But there is a dem president, so that wouldn't sell as many dvds. You say you study both sides, but only has still has his cock in your mouth.

  • This is what I mean, you don't know a thing about what you're rambling about. Alex Jones is VERY critical of them Democrats, and constantly talked of Clinton when he was in office. If you actually knew anything about Alex Jones, you'd know that he's no democrat supporter; hell, he spent half of his first 9/11 documentary talking about Clinton! As for your other misnomer, Alex Jones openly lets people make free copies of his work. He uploads his documentaries to GoogleVideo for christ sake.

  • Will you ever TRY to get your facts straight before you criticize an issue next time? Oops, forgot, you don't researching things :).

  • Alright Kymus, let's attack this while you are jerking off to your Alex Jones poster getting close to making a mess on his face. Quit dodging with "do your research" comments and tell me a 911 conspiracy point I can't debunk with facts.

    I think you have actually used Alex jones as a mold for yourself. only one problem, Jones is very smart. Here's your chance.

  • Dodging? LMAO!! You're the one who is using strawman arguments and refuses to do any research into a subject to atleast get the most basic of facts right. This discussion is pointless; you know nothing about debate, nothing about this subject, nothing about Alex Jones, and - obviously - since you hate researching and believe that everything on the internet is false (except, I suppose, what Fox News says). It's debating art with a blind man!

  • Trying to prove something to you is pointless. You already said that everything on the internet is not credible, so am curious what we would do.. Oh yeah! Do what you keep doing: come up with poor conjecture and substitute that for fact! Conjecture is much better than actually proving something and backing it with a source.

  • "The extreme right in America now has a propaganda machine more powerful that Hitler's, and a brainwashed following more lethal than the Hilter Youth." - Robert Steele (former US Spy of 20 years, National Intelligence guru, and founder of OSS(dot)net)

  • You would be awesome at dodgeball, strawman. Ignorance isn't the reluctance to learn. Ignorance is thinking you know what you're talking about. You are also wrong thinking that I pay attentin to fox news. Ignorance, strawman. Do you not have an original thought or is that why you dismiss as a lack of research? Your technique is much like Alex's. Look here but don't look over here. Believe me w/o question. Come on, one question. Think hard. Research your Alex jones' sites.

  • The other typical thing about you is that you are one of those conspiracy thoerists that believe the media is "right wing". You must watch the news on mute. Oh wait, I got it, Alex told you it was right wing.

  • I like Alex Jones...but he is a whack job.

  • how is he a whack job? He proves everything he talks about

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more