WCBS Raw Tape, NIST FOIA release 25, 42A0116 - G25D26

[danp5648]

33:43 is building 6 to left is the post office and to the right is building 7 

[Headshothorror4488]

@mj4ever Your a moron, AE911TRUTH Experts disagree with you, tube troll ! More then 60% all usa peeps disagree wit u FACT

[Sandberg1972]

Like I said, it's about ur pathetic stupid ONE little question, which according to you, decides whether the official account is true or not. This is beyong pathetic and foolish, and shows or unwillingness to look at the large number of facts and evidence that proove and/or indicate the official account is highly doubtful at best.

Good luck dude with this attitude, u'll get there. Cheers mate!

[Sandberg1972]

And so while pointing out bullshittheories is a good thing, ignoring key questions that have gone unanswered, or are routinely answered with a non-answer, is not a good thing in my view. I wonder if u even know that there wasn't even gonna be an investigation at ALL at first, it was only for the Jersey Girls that something got started (431 days after 911, pretty quick ey?). I'm sure that doesn't raise any eyebrows with u, does it? I could make a long list of those things, so what's going on?

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 Please. You really think the Bush administration can hide a secret that big for almost 10 years? Who is the naive now? I do have information that can be backed up and that is verifiable. The one who can't do that is you. And by far no one of you people has been able to answer me this question: Tell me where are the visible flashes and huge explosions in this video? watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0 Please just answer the question. That is all i'm asking for, is not that hard. It is for you xD

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 U're evading the questions, did u know that, if it wasn't for the jersey Girls, there would not even be an investigation, at all?

And speaking of hiding secrets, do u have any idea how much evidence has been destroyed and is withheld, up to this day? I guess u do not have a clue. Bush is a mere puppet, it's not about him, but about the people behind him. This vid u're referring to, is it about WTC7, 1 or 2? WTC7 is an obvious implosion, why can't u see that? Or can u?

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 If it was so obvious then everyone would know, and we wouldn't be laughing at you guys. AND WHAT THE FUCK DONT YOU UNDERSTAND. ANSWER MY FUCKING QUESTION. If its so easy to recognize the implosion THEN WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU WAITING FOR TO SHOW ME.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 Many people do know, that's the point. U're obviously not interested in the truth about what really happened that day, all u can parrott is ur stupid claim and ur stupid question. Clearly u don't know the first thing about basic physics. If I have to show u the implosion of WTC7, then u obviously do not even know what an implosion is. Look up a few implosions, see what they look like, and compare them to the implosion of WTC7, maybe an alarmbell will start to ring, but I doubt it.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 And my question about the Jersey Girls was a bit more easy, don't u think? Care for an answer? Did u or did u not know, that if it wasn't for these Jersey Girls, there wouldn't even be an investigation at all? Did u also know that 431 days passed (that's more than a year) before the official investigation got underway? Do u know that Bin Laden is not wanted by the FBI for 9/11? Did u know that members of the 911-commission said that the investigation was compromised? Guess not huh?

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 I do know what the Jersey Girls are, they are widow conspirators that like ALL of the conspirators have lack of evidence. Obviously they will take a lot of time would pass until they found who and why made the attacks imbecile. Bin Laden IS wanted for the FBI (don't make up things just go into their page) And I answer your questions moron. Now you answer my question or don't come back. Funny how no one answers me when I ask that question. Lack of evidence maybe?

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 The Jersey Girls are widow conspirators? I feel deeply sorry for u dude, deeply sorry.

Since when does noticing that the majority of all the questions is not answered means that u're a conspirator? U like to stay uninformed, don't u? Destruction and withholding of evidence means nothing to u, does it? And it's YOU that obviously has NOT looked on the FBI-webpage, he's NOT wanted for 911, because there's not enough evidence to support such a charge. He's wanted for other stuff, sure.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 So u're referring me the one single video, in which according to ur imbecile ignorant ass no flashes or explosions are visible, and that should be case closed, right?

I suggest you just stop coming here, and stick to ur fantasies, and by all means do not even try to understand the physics component of the 3 building "collapses". It's not lack of evidence, it's ur lack of common knowledge of physics, it's ur inability and no doubt unwillingness to do proper research, nothing more ;-)

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 Lol, it's funny how you try to avoid my question. I suggest you to open your eyes and stop looking what you want and actually realize that there are facts that 9/11 was not an inside job. Please, do you really think a government can keep a secret for almost 10 years? do you know more than 500 persons will need to be part of this "conspiracy" you are like a Thomas Hobbes from this time but 1000000000 times more stupid and ignorant-

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 So it's all about ur stupid question, right? It's funny that you would even think it's the right question, or the most important question for that matter. Where did this amazing idea pop into ur head? Could u explain how u got to this 500-figure? That would be nice. U're right, the govt. cannot keep it a secret, it's only being purposely hidden as much as possible, while anyone mere hinting that something's wrong with the OCT is immediately labeled insane, to be ridiculed at will.

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 Lol. It is all about my question because I have answer your question. But you still talking shit. Im tired of you, like 20 comments before I asked you the question and still you havent answer it. That proves you can't answer my question because you lack of information and because obviously there are not flashes and explosions in the link I send you. :) Don't answer me back if you are going to talk more bullshit. Stop sounding like a broken record for one time in your life.

[punxsutawneybarney]

I don't have time for 49 minute videos, especially when they're recommended by people who are so ignorant they don't know that they're saying things that are not true.

[MJ4ever911]

And you CTV911, you have to be the biggest idiot in this planet. You are a conspirator, and you download this video that shows that there were actually planes on 9/11 and no planes?

[MJ4ever911]

@MJ4ever911 I confused I meant "there were actually planes on 9/11 and no bombs?

[WTFaboutWTC7]

Everything pulverized to dust!

How can anyone say these so called collapses weren't controled demolitions after seeing this and after all that's been investigated by sccientists, architects and engineers...

Nano-thermate brought down these towers.

The world needs justice.

'cmon Americans!

[MJ4ever911]

@WTFaboutWTC7 Lol there are big differences between a controlled demolition and the WTC collapse. There are 12.000 architects who contradicts the 9/11 official story while there are 35.000 proffesional architects who don't find the collapse wierd.

[WTFaboutWTC7]

@MJ4ever911 It's not a collapse. It is a total pulverization and total dismemberment of the buildings at near freefall speed wich can ONLY be accomplished by blowing out the supporting columns. If you think that just TWO planes can make THREE totally "collapse" to the ground and cause THAT MUCH devastation, you should get your head examined.

Can't wait to hear your bullshit answer on that...

[MJ4ever911]

@WTFaboutWTC7 Lol, i'll answer your question when you answer my question. If it was a controlled demolition why can't we see the tons of flashes and explosions? than can be heard from miles? If it was a controlled deomolition why didn't the collapse was fromt he bottom? and why does there is no report of explosives on ground zero?

[WTFaboutWTC7]

@MJ4ever911 watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

[MJ4ever911]

@WTFaboutWTC7 Why didn't they found aluminum oxide and barium nitrate then? It is fundamental for thermite.

[WTFaboutWTC7]

@MJ4ever911 Search for "9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE"

And watch the interviews with Steven Jones, Niels Harrit, Jeff Farrer and Mark Basile

[MJ4ever911]

@WTFaboutWTC7 Search for "Debunking 9/11: Thermite chemical"

[WTFaboutWTC7]

@MJ4ever911 Keep it up : )

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 First of all, get ur numbers right, OK? Second, these "collapses" show remarkable similarities with CD and very few similarities with a gravitational collapse. Buildings, especially steel highrises, with asymmetrical damage and random burning fires do not tend to fall through themselves while completely annihilating everything. It's not that hard to imagine that I would think. But apparently, for most people, it is.

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 Um, I recomend you to do a study. CD show tons and tons of flashes, and huges explosions than can be heard miles ago. Don't make up things just to answer me. If it was a CD then every witness would know, and the best and most important companies in the world would speak. If 9/11 was so obvious, then everybody would know, and we wouldn't be laughing at you guys. Please don't try to trick me, I know when people make up things.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 U're evading the arguments here I'm afraid. I recommend u do some real research, & look into the arguments of the 1400+ licensed architects & engineers first. Then move on 2 the psychological angle of these attacks. I'm not trying to trick u, it's you or rather, ur brain, that's trying to trick you. Huge explosions were heard by many witnesses (which were ignored by NIST of course, courtesy of Philip Zelikow, look that name up if u will). Ever heard that big lies are easier to sell?

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 More than 3500 recognized architest in the world agrees with the 9/11 official story. You can do the research. Big important companies as I said agrees with the official story too. 10 years and people don't bbelieve at your conspiracies. You should get a life and a job. And the witnesses never said hearing huge explosions. Only some survivors said they heard explosions. Later on they realized it was the south tower collapsing.

[punxsutawneybarney]

@MJ4ever911 Please back up your claim that 3500 architects agree with the official story. Specifically, how many architects will specifically endorse the NIST report. How many independent architects (no contracts with, awards from, employment with, appointments by, publications by, or co-authorship of papers with NIST people)?

In the oral histories 115 first responders reported flashes of light and/or sounds consistent with explosions.

[MJ4ever911]

@punxsutawneybarney Ok my friend, just to letting you know the AE911Truth was created by a bunch of unemployed architects and engenieers. Second, your 115 responders NEVER EVER said they saw lights or sounds. Let's do this, watch this video: watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0 and tell me exactly where are ALL the flashes we are supposed to see in the floors below the impact. And show me where can I see sign of explosions. If you tell me I will stop fighting against you and I'll quit.

[punxsutawneybarney]

@MJ4ever911 AE911Truth was started by an employed architect, Richard Gage, AIA. One of the first people he signed up was his boss at Akol and Yoshii Architects. Several of his colleagues at the firm also signed up.

115 first responders reported flashes of light or sounds of explosions. See the article "Explosive Testimony".

[MJ4ever911]

@punxsutawneybarney Hey, just look at the video and answer my question. It's not that hard.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 Where do u get ur info mate, I wonder? How's ur knowledge of basic physics? Ever heard of potential energy and kinetic energy, labour, acceleration of gravity and such?

It's all about reconciling oneself first with the possibility that 911 was an "outsourced job". Most people can't even bring themselves to that, because the consequences are too great to bear. And that's true of course, but that don't mean there isn't any merit in saying that the OCT is hard to buy, to say the least

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 What does the OCT does? They create the most complicated story and they say all what they say it's true just because their information seems to be more clear. However they most of the times lack of evidence, most of the times their theories get debunk, and it's funny how only skeptic people believes their story. When you have a very well done theory you will never be debunk, you will never lack of evidence and most of the people will find the theory very obvious.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 I'm sorry, but I cannot make anything of this last post.

The official OCT is exactly that, a Conspiracy Theory. Mind you, with a truckload of assertions that cannot be backed up by any verifiable or credible evidence. But that only comes when one takes the time to investigate the claims that are being made. And while it is true of course, that there've been many bullshit conspiracies, a great number of questions are unanswered up 2 this day, which in itself points to a conspiracy.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 Good luck staying in deep denial, by all means, do not even try to do more indepth research, it's obvious u don't want to believe it. I can understand that, even accept it. U're one of many.

U must be wondering about all these professionals putting their credibilty and more on the line & at stake, not to mention shitloads of ridicule, just to say that the official account cannot be true because it's impossible. There are so many unanswered questions, I wonder if u're aware of that.

[MJ4ever911]

@Sandberg1972 I know this is a lot to ask, but could you stop sounding like a broken record? As I said, if it was so obvious then everyone would know and we wouldn't be laughing at you guys. It's funny how you think all the persons who agree with the official story are bad people. Proffesionals scientist, architects, engeeniers, witnesses... oh no they are all lying 9/11 was an inside job please. I recomend you to watch the Debunking 9/11 videos.

[Sandberg1972]

@MJ4ever911 I don't think all the persons who agree with the OCT are "bad" persons. Who gave u that idea? U can laugh at people who don't believe the OCT, but often they have very good arguments to do so. U don't, because all u seem to do is blindly believe what the socalled "pro's" say. U obviously lack the courage to think for urself, and also the confidence to come to ur own conclusions concerning the destruction of these 3 buildings. U could also do with doing more research. Cheers mate!

[qqaaaqqq]

@WTFaboutWTC7 u stupid person

[WTFaboutWTC7]

@qqaaaqqq Any basis for that statement?