@rkorczeniewski Not really quite as accurately, or as long as an Omega. It's like comparing a Honda to a Bentley. Guess not everyone appreciates a good time piece.
@hsharma92 ok timex was a bad example, but solar powered, atomically synchronized, titanium Casio isn't, and for around 200.00$ you absolutely get accuracy, longevity, and looks. Even COSC certified chronometers are +6/-4seconds per day, really laughable for watches easily over 2000.00 dollars
@rkorczeniewski Well, the average $200 watch doesn't last more than 3-5 years. The COSC test ensures that the watch can keep accurate time over a variety of extreme conditions and +6/-4 seconds is their max limit. Almost all Omegas keep +1/-2 seconds and maintain it over a much longer period of time. Casio watches aren't close to as tough as Omega's Speedmaster & Seamaster collection. The Speedmaster range is the only watch to make it to the moon & that says something about their movement.
@hsharma92 you obviously like to overpay for things. titanium watches will absolutely last longer than 5 years. Omega's +1/-2sec/day doesn't come close to Atomically corrected time that will be dead-nuts on accurate everyday to within sub-seconds. now for your "to the moon and back" comment. If this was 1960 I would agree with you, but it's 2012, technology has moved on. in the 1960 there was no atomically corrected titanium casios, so they got by with what they had.
and for all intents and purposes the 15$ timex keeps time just as well
rkorczeniewski 3 months ago
@rkorczeniewski Not really quite as accurately, or as long as an Omega. It's like comparing a Honda to a Bentley. Guess not everyone appreciates a good time piece.
hsharma92 1 month ago
@hsharma92 ok timex was a bad example, but solar powered, atomically synchronized, titanium Casio isn't, and for around 200.00$ you absolutely get accuracy, longevity, and looks. Even COSC certified chronometers are +6/-4seconds per day, really laughable for watches easily over 2000.00 dollars
rkorczeniewski 1 month ago
@rkorczeniewski Well, the average $200 watch doesn't last more than 3-5 years. The COSC test ensures that the watch can keep accurate time over a variety of extreme conditions and +6/-4 seconds is their max limit. Almost all Omegas keep +1/-2 seconds and maintain it over a much longer period of time. Casio watches aren't close to as tough as Omega's Speedmaster & Seamaster collection. The Speedmaster range is the only watch to make it to the moon & that says something about their movement.
hsharma92 1 month ago
@hsharma92 you obviously like to overpay for things. titanium watches will absolutely last longer than 5 years. Omega's +1/-2sec/day doesn't come close to Atomically corrected time that will be dead-nuts on accurate everyday to within sub-seconds. now for your "to the moon and back" comment. If this was 1960 I would agree with you, but it's 2012, technology has moved on. in the 1960 there was no atomically corrected titanium casios, so they got by with what they had.
rkorczeniewski 1 month ago
lol wowwwww. Soooo dramatic!
XJeep89 6 months ago